|
|
|
Size
|
seen this critique of Turnitin?
|
CHARLES OPPENHEIM |
Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:13:47 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: Penalty Tariff System
|
Toby Grainger |
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:59:36 +0100 |
608 lines |
Re: Penalty Tariff System
|
Jon Appleton |
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 11:10:13 +0100 |
289 lines |
Re: Penalty Tariff System
|
Erica Morris |
Wed, 14 Sep 2011 10:56:51 +0000 |
200 lines |
Penalty Tariff System
|
Jenni Dunne |
Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:50:26 +0100 |
34 lines |
The plagiarism wars
|
Dr. Mike Reddy |
Sun, 11 Sep 2011 09:56:22 +0100 |
21 lines |
Re: Is "Proof reading" a legitimate action?
|
Ken Masters |
Mon, 5 Sep 2011 15:38:59 +0400 |
865 lines |
Re: Is "Proof reading" a legitimate action?
|
Jon Appleton |
Mon, 5 Sep 2011 12:12:24 +0100 |
816 lines |
Re: Is "Proof reading" a legitimate action?
|
Schmitt, Diane |
Mon, 5 Sep 2011 10:31:38 +0000 |
318 lines |
Re: Is "Proof reading" a legitimate action?
|
Jon Appleton |
Mon, 5 Sep 2011 10:37:29 +0100 |
879 lines |
Re: Is "Proof reading" a legitimate action?
|
Jon Appleton |
Fri, 2 Sep 2011 16:50:09 +0100 |
635 lines |
Re: Is "Proof reading" a legitimate action?
|
Duncan Williamson |
Fri, 2 Sep 2011 14:29:48 +0100 |
667 lines |
Re: Is "Proof reading" a legitimate action?
|
Maria O'Hara |
Fri, 2 Sep 2011 09:20:49 +0100 |
146 lines |
Re: Is "Proof reading" a legitimate action?
|
Derek J Ord |
Fri, 2 Sep 2011 09:09:09 +0100 |
130 lines |
Re: Is "Proof reading" a legitimate action?
|
Lynn Shaw |
Fri, 2 Sep 2011 08:52:42 +0100 |
57 lines |
Re: Is "Proof reading" a legitimate action?
|
Dr. Mike Reddy |
Fri, 2 Sep 2011 06:27:51 +0100 |
29 lines |
Re: Is "Proof reading" a legitimate action?
|
Claire Hughes |
Thu, 1 Sep 2011 16:34:09 +0100 |
339 lines |
Re: Is "Proof reading" a legitimate action?
|
Wells, Julian |
Thu, 1 Sep 2011 15:56:47 +0100 |
647 lines |
Is "Proof reading" a legitimate action?
|
Robert Clarke |
Thu, 1 Sep 2011 14:50:01 +0100 |
336 lines |