JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


September 2011


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

Any Twitterers Out there? (10 messages)
Any Twitterers Out there? [UNCLASSIFIED] (11 messages)
Children’s case files found in second-hand furniture shop (2 messages)
Civil disclosure (3 messages)
Civil Enforcement Officers Badge Numbers (5 messages)
Cloud Computing again (5 messages)
Criminal Convictions (1 message)
Definition of Consent - Free Sample September Privacy Journal (1 message)
Does children's case management law trump the dpa? (3 messages)
email addresses (9 messages)
Estranged Parents (7 messages)
Fines (1 message)
First core participants in Leveson Inquiry announced (1 message)
Freedom of Speech Data Sharing Protocol (1 message)
FW: New undertaking (1 message)
FW: YOTs as Data Controller (1 message)
FW: [data-protection] Solicitor requesting information (2 messages)
Fyi Michael Gove private emails 'subject to freedom of information law' | Politics | The Guardian (1 message)
FYI: Hawktalk: Personal data sharing: when it goes wrong, it's a nightmare? (1 message)
Harassment Cases (10 messages)
Hawktalk: Commissioner criticises the Data Protection and Freedom of Information regimes (1 message)
Hawktalk: could Mr Gove's emails breach the DPA as well as FOIA? (1 message)
Hawktalk: ICO criticises DP compliance by local authorities & cannot understand banks attitude towards DP audit (1 message)
Hawktalk: Riotous behaviour: which law legitimises the blocking of communications? (1 message)
ICO before the Justice Committee tomorrow at 10:15 (1 message)
ICO Data Sharing Code (1 message)
ISEB Exams (1 message)
Journalist Publishes His Income (1 message)
More Local Govt MPNs on the way? (2 messages)
Naming of files (3 messages)
New Podcast (1 message)
New undertaking (1 message)
New US TV Show (1 message)
News about cloud and data protection (6 messages)
O'Hara's report on transparency and privacy (1 message)
O'Hara's report on transparency and privacy has anyone had a look at it yet? (8 messages)
Online Courses (1 message)
Parental access to student data (FE) (2 messages)
PFI, Refusing Requests, Schools and Public Sector Salaries (1 message)
Privacy defintion query (1 message)
Privacy policies, trans-border dataflows, data processor agreements (1 message)
Private Landlord Registration (3 messages)
Quick comment: O'Hara's report on transparency and privacy (3 messages)
Quick comment: O'Hara's report on transparency and privacy [what about data mining?] (2 messages)
Readacted items (7 messages)
Request for Data Under Section 29(1)(c) for the collection of Council Tax arrears (9 messages)
Responsible DP (1 message)
Right To Know Day (1 message)
RSPCA & Section 29 (6 messages)
Section 35 (8 messages)
Serious DPA Breach leads to call for prison sentences (1 message)
Solicitor requesting information (13 messages)
Straw poll on sections 8 & 9 of Schedule 7 (10 messages)
Straw poll on sections 8 & 9 of Schedule 7 [UNCLASSIFIED] (3 messages)
subject information provisions (4 messages)
Subject: RE: [data-protection] Symptomatic white collar crime (1 message)
Symptomatic white collar crime (2 messages)
The ICO does enforce more than the 7th Principle. :) (Eastleigh Undertaking on use of PVP list (3 messages)
The Postal Services Act 2000 (15 messages)
Walsall Residents Details in Skip (1 message)
Who Has the ICO Caught in Last three months? (5 messages)
Witholding Social Care records (2 messages)
Worker sacked in data breach (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

Any Twitterers Out there?

Any Twitterers Out there?

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 09:41:56 +0100

37 lines

Re: Any Twitterers Out there?

Lemon, Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 09:45:16 +0100

94 lines

Re: Any Twitterers Out there?

KPG Professional Services <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 09:45:24 +0100

161 lines

Re: Any Twitterers Out there?

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 09:49:46 +0100

110 lines

Re: Any Twitterers Out there?

KPG Professional Services <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 09:52:00 +0100

269 lines

Re: Any Twitterers Out there?

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 10:11:25 +0100

32 lines

Re: Any Twitterers Out there?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 10:23:47 +0100

171 lines

Re: Any Twitterers Out there?

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 10:33:41 +0100

216 lines

Re: Any Twitterers Out there?

Alan Stead <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 12:06:24 +0100

77 lines

Re: Any Twitterers Out there?

J.S.M.Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 14:55:21 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

Any Twitterers Out there? [UNCLASSIFIED]

Re: Any Twitterers Out there? [UNCLASSIFIED]

Healy, Susan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 12:53:24 +0100

153 lines

Re: Any Twitterers Out there? [UNCLASSIFIED]

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 13:31:32 +0100

298 lines

Re: Any Twitterers Out there? [UNCLASSIFIED]

Lynn Wyeth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 13:31:38 +0100

37 lines

Re: Any Twitterers Out there? [UNCLASSIFIED]

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 13:34:20 +0100

274 lines

Re: Any Twitterers Out there? [UNCLASSIFIED]

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:13:23 +0100

313 lines

Re: Any Twitterers Out there? [UNCLASSIFIED]

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:17:39 +0100

390 lines

Re: Any Twitterers Out there? [UNCLASSIFIED]

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:26:48 +0100

352 lines

Re: Any Twitterers Out there? [UNCLASSIFIED]

Jethro R Binks <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:30:17 +0100

346 lines

Re: Any Twitterers Out there? [UNCLASSIFIED]

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 17:21:55 +0100

442 lines

Re: Any Twitterers Out there? [UNCLASSIFIED]

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 19:12:19 +0100

408 lines

Re: Any Twitterers Out there? [UNCLASSIFIED]

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:17:18 +0100

59 lines

New Thread

Children’s case files found in second-hand furniture shop

Children’s case files found in second-hand furniture shop

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Sep 2011 07:43:25 +0100

46 lines

Re: Children’s case files found in second-hand furniture shop

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Sep 2011 09:12:33 +0100

85 lines

New Thread

Civil disclosure

Civil disclosure

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 14:53:15 +0100

37 lines

Re: Civil disclosure

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 16:03:23 +0100

241 lines

Re: Civil disclosure

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 16:20:32 +0100

80 lines

New Thread

Civil Enforcement Officers Badge Numbers

Civil Enforcement Officers Badge Numbers

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Sep 2011 14:40:56 +0100

68 lines

Re: Civil Enforcement Officers Badge Numbers

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Sep 2011 14:48:29 +0100

144 lines

Re: Civil Enforcement Officers Badge Numbers

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Sep 2011 15:00:16 +0100

88 lines

Re: Civil Enforcement Officers Badge Numbers

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Sep 2011 15:14:04 +0100

116 lines

Re: Civil Enforcement Officers Badge Numbers

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Sep 2011 15:41:28 +0100

180 lines

New Thread

Cloud Computing again

Re: Cloud Computing again

Andrew Cormack <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Sep 2011 09:03:04 +0000

62 lines

Re: Cloud Computing again

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Sep 2011 10:20:27 +0100

406 lines

Re: Cloud Computing again

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Sep 2011 12:08:43 +0100

109 lines

Re: Cloud Computing again

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Sep 2011 13:28:16 +0100

140 lines

Re: Cloud Computing again

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Sep 2011 10:02:46 +0100

112 lines

New Thread

Criminal Convictions

Criminal Convictions

Trevor Pearce <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:09:49 +0100

229 lines

New Thread

Definition of Consent - Free Sample September Privacy Journal

Definition of Consent - Free Sample September Privacy Journal

Lisa Souza - PDP <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 14:17:13 +0100

750 lines

New Thread

Does children's case management law trump the dpa?

Does children's case management law trump the dpa?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Sep 2011 07:26:10 +0100

89 lines

Re: Does children's case management law trump the dpa?

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Sep 2011 10:12:51 +0100

133 lines

Re: Does children's case management law trump the dpa?

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Sep 2011 10:50:48 +0100

213 lines

New Thread

email addresses

email addresses

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Sep 2011 11:40:29 +0100

38 lines

Re: email addresses

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Sep 2011 11:47:31 +0100

93 lines

Re: email addresses

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Sep 2011 11:54:58 +0100

154 lines

Re: email addresses

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Sep 2011 11:59:25 +0100

143 lines

Re: email addresses

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Sep 2011 11:58:32 +0100

203 lines

Re: email addresses

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Sep 2011 12:06:21 +0100

233 lines

Re: email addresses

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Sep 2011 12:16:50 +0100

225 lines

Re: email addresses

Alan Stead <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Sep 2011 14:51:41 +0100

131 lines

Re: email addresses

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Sep 2011 17:24:48 +0100

163 lines

New Thread

Estranged Parents

Estranged Parents

Cotterill, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:43:17 +0100

156 lines

Re: Estranged Parents

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Sep 2011 13:09:22 +0100

379 lines

Re: Estranged Parents

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Sep 2011 13:19:36 +0100

366 lines

Re: Estranged Parents

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Sep 2011 13:20:55 +0100

332 lines

Re: Estranged Parents

Cotterill, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Sep 2011 14:01:54 +0100

435 lines

Re: Estranged Parents

Michelle Peel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 09:35:02 +0100

47 lines

Re: Estranged Parents

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:36:14 +0100

86 lines

New Thread

Fines

Fines

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Sep 2011 09:28:35 +0100

44 lines

New Thread

First core participants in Leveson Inquiry announced

First core participants in Leveson Inquiry announced

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 15:13:29 +0100

959 lines

New Thread

Freedom of Speech Data Sharing Protocol

Freedom of Speech Data Sharing Protocol

Matthew Cooper <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Sep 2011 12:17:41 +0000

473 lines

New Thread

FW: New undertaking

FW: New undertaking

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 16:30:39 +0100

264 lines

New Thread

FW: YOTs as Data Controller

FW: YOTs as Data Controller

Peel, Michelle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Sep 2011 14:04:11 +0100

800 lines

New Thread

FW: [data-protection] Solicitor requesting information

FW: [data-protection] Solicitor requesting information

Terry Hutchinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Sep 2011 13:19:28 +0100

689 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Solicitor requesting information

KPG Professional Services <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Sep 2011 14:03:52 +0100

840 lines

New Thread

Fyi Michael Gove private emails 'subject to freedom of information law' | Politics | The Guardian

Fyi Michael Gove private emails 'subject to freedom of information law' | Politics | The Guardian

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Sep 2011 14:05:24 +0100

199 lines

New Thread

FYI: Hawktalk: Personal data sharing: when it goes wrong, it's a nightmare?

FYI: Hawktalk: Personal data sharing: when it goes wrong, it's a nightmare?

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Sep 2011 13:51:01 +0100

293 lines

New Thread

Harassment Cases

Harassment Cases

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Sep 2011 09:28:21 +0100

77 lines

Re: Harassment Cases

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Sep 2011 09:38:48 +0100

161 lines

Re: Harassment Cases

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Sep 2011 09:45:06 +0100

192 lines

Re: Harassment Cases

KPG Professional Services <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Sep 2011 09:45:30 +0100

262 lines

Re: Harassment Cases

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Sep 2011 09:56:52 +0100

99 lines

Re: Harassment Cases

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:05:41 +0100

209 lines

Re: Harassment Cases

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:11:00 +0100

160 lines

Re: Harassment Cases

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:17:36 +0100

315 lines

Re: Harassment Cases

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:49:30 +0100

142 lines

Re: Harassment Cases

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:12:57 +0100

215 lines

New Thread

Hawktalk: Commissioner criticises the Data Protection and Freedom of Information regimes

Hawktalk: Commissioner criticises the Data Protection and Freedom of Information regimes

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Sep 2011 11:31:34 +0100

227 lines

New Thread

Hawktalk: could Mr Gove's emails breach the DPA as well as FOIA?

Hawktalk: could Mr Gove's emails breach the DPA as well as FOIA?

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Sep 2011 10:37:27 +0100

215 lines

New Thread

Hawktalk: ICO criticises DP compliance by local authorities & cannot understand banks attitude towards DP audit

Hawktalk: ICO criticises DP compliance by local authorities & cannot understand banks attitude towards DP audit

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:53:57 +0100

229 lines

New Thread

Hawktalk: Riotous behaviour: which law legitimises the blocking of communications?

Hawktalk: Riotous behaviour: which law legitimises the blocking of communications?

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Sep 2011 14:12:34 +0100

186 lines

New Thread

ICO before the Justice Committee tomorrow at 10:15

ICO before the Justice Committee tomorrow at 10:15

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Sep 2011 13:01:57 +0100

104 lines

New Thread

ICO Data Sharing Code

ICO Data Sharing Code

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Sep 2011 09:08:07 +0100

31 lines

New Thread

ISEB Exams

ISEB Exams

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 09:31:59 +0100

47 lines

New Thread

Journalist Publishes His Income

Journalist Publishes His Income

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Sep 2011 09:07:08 +0100

134 lines

New Thread

More Local Govt MPNs on the way?

More Local Govt MPNs on the way?

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:24:45 +0100

179 lines

Re: More Local Govt MPNs on the way?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Sep 2011 13:02:20 +0100

335 lines

New Thread

Naming of files

Naming of files

Wendy Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Sep 2011 12:54:44 +0100

48 lines

Re: Naming of files

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:32:24 +0100

127 lines

Re: Naming of files

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:41:10 +0100

121 lines

New Thread

New Podcast

New Podcast

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Sep 2011 09:47:01 +0100

123 lines

New Thread

New undertaking

New undertaking

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 13:36:33 +0100

184 lines

New Thread

New US TV Show

New US TV Show

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Sep 2011 09:36:48 +0100

87 lines

New Thread

News about cloud and data protection

News about cloud and data protection

CHARLES OPPENHEIM <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Sep 2011 12:24:17 +0100

76 lines

Re: News about cloud and data protection

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Sep 2011 13:00:21 +0100

45 lines

Re: News about cloud and data protection

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Sep 2011 08:06:29 -0400

303 lines

Re: News about cloud and data protection

CHARLES OPPENHEIM <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Sep 2011 13:10:08 +0100

229 lines

Re: News about cloud and data protection

Andrew Cormack <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Sep 2011 12:20:15 +0000

192 lines

Re: News about cloud and data protection

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Sep 2011 14:17:22 +0100

35 lines

New Thread

O'Hara's report on transparency and privacy

Re: O'Hara's report on transparency and privacy

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:27:11 +0100

342 lines

New Thread

O'Hara's report on transparency and privacy has anyone had a look at it yet?

O'Hara's report on transparency and privacy has anyone had a look at it yet?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 10:02:33 +0100

486 lines

Re: O'Hara's report on transparency and privacy has anyone had a look at it yet?

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 11:50:54 +0100

565 lines

Re: O'Hara's report on transparency and privacy has anyone had a look at it yet?

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 09:12:56 +0100

542 lines

Re: O'Hara's report on transparency and privacy has anyone had a look at it yet?

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 09:43:07 +0100

451 lines

Re: O'Hara's report on transparency and privacy has anyone had a look at it yet?

Ben Plouviez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:55:50 +0100

558 lines

Re: O'Hara's report on transparency and privacy has anyone had a look at it yet?

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 11:10:45 +0100

412 lines

Re: O'Hara's report on transparency and privacy has anyone had a look at it yet?

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 11:22:25 +0100

134 lines

Re: O'Hara's report on transparency and privacy has anyone had a look at it yet?

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:21:04 +0100

168 lines

New Thread

Online Courses

Online Courses

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Sep 2011 10:10:52 +0100

46 lines

New Thread

Parental access to student data (FE)

Parental access to student data (FE)

Dunster, Jon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Sep 2011 12:32:25 +0100

52 lines

Re: Parental access to student data (FE)

Michelle Peel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Sep 2011 08:45:04 +0100

60 lines

New Thread

PFI, Refusing Requests, Schools and Public Sector Salaries

PFI, Refusing Requests, Schools and Public Sector Salaries

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Sep 2011 11:29:26 +0100

45 lines

New Thread

Privacy defintion query

Privacy defintion query

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Sep 2011 11:50:47 +0100

49 lines

New Thread

Privacy policies, trans-border dataflows, data processor agreements

Privacy policies, trans-border dataflows, data processor agreements

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Sep 2011 12:18:18 +0100

44 lines

New Thread

Private Landlord Registration

Private Landlord Registration

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:34:31 +0100

242 lines

Re: Private Landlord Registration

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:44:47 +0100

445 lines

Re: Private Landlord Registration

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Sep 2011 13:15:30 +0100

655 lines

New Thread

Quick comment: O'Hara's report on transparency and privacy

Quick comment: O'Hara's report on transparency and privacy

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 13:18:48 +0100

355 lines

Re: Quick comment: O'Hara's report on transparency and privacy

KPG Professional Services <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 13:26:04 +0100

430 lines

Re: Quick comment: O'Hara's report on transparency and privacy

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 14:05:05 +0100

582 lines

New Thread

Quick comment: O'Hara's report on transparency and privacy [what about data mining?]

Re: Quick comment: O'Hara's report on transparency and privacy [what about data mining?]

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 11:37:32 +0100

613 lines

Re: Quick comment: O'Hara's report on transparency and privacy [what about data mining?]

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 11:58:22 +0100

877 lines

New Thread

Readacted items

Readacted items

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Sep 2011 12:51:10 +0100

30 lines

Re: Readacted items

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Sep 2011 13:01:32 +0100

107 lines

Re: Readacted items

Peter Dinsdale <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Sep 2011 13:06:04 +0100

58 lines

Re: Readacted items

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Sep 2011 13:06:06 +0100

147 lines

Re: Readacted items

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Sep 2011 13:23:26 +0100

228 lines

Re: Readacted items

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Sep 2011 13:19:56 +0100

161 lines

Re: Readacted items

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Sep 2011 13:23:41 +0100

206 lines

New Thread

Request for Data Under Section 29(1)(c) for the collection of Council Tax arrears

Request for Data Under Section 29(1)(c) for the collection of Council Tax arrears

Mike Gater <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 14:26:40 +0100

56 lines

Re: Request for Data Under Section 29(1)(c) for the collection of Council Tax arrears

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 14:36:44 +0100

147 lines

Re: Request for Data Under Section 29(1)(c) for the collection of Council Tax arrears

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:00:02 +0100

137 lines

Re: Request for Data Under Section 29(1)(c) for the collection of Council Tax arrears

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:02:00 +0100

327 lines

Re: Request for Data Under Section 29(1)(c) for the collection of Council Tax arrears

Mike Gater <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:11:07 +0100

360 lines

Re: Request for Data Under Section 29(1)(c) for the collection of Council Tax arrears

Mike Gater <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:21:53 +0100

220 lines

Re: Request for Data Under Section 29(1)(c) for the collection of Council Tax arrears

Hutchings, Jayne <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 14:33:46 +0000

319 lines

Re: Request for Data Under Section 29(1)(c) for the collection of Council Tax arrears

Chris Brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:27:00 +0100

367 lines

Re: Request for Data Under Section 29(1)(c) for the collection of Council Tax arrears

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:57:37 +0100

67 lines

New Thread

Responsible DP

Responsible DP

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Sep 2011 11:06:31 +0100

34 lines

New Thread

Right To Know Day

Right To Know Day

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Sep 2011 10:10:13 +0100

37 lines

New Thread

RSPCA & Section 29

RSPCA & Section 29

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:17:51 +0100

38 lines

Re: RSPCA & Section 29

Harrison, Iain <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:26:04 +0000

86 lines

Re: RSPCA & Section 29

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:25:47 +0100

161 lines

Re: RSPCA & Section 29

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:30:02 +0100

97 lines

Re: RSPCA & Section 29

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:46:21 +0100

192 lines

Re: RSPCA & Section 29

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Sep 2011 11:51:25 +0100

55 lines

New Thread

Section 35

Section 35

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:58:29 +0100

34 lines

Re: Section 35

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 10:08:16 +0100

91 lines

Re: Section 35

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 10:48:02 +0100

158 lines

Re: Section 35

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 10:50:14 +0100

236 lines

Re: Section 35

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 10:57:18 +0100

283 lines

Re: Section 35

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 11:02:16 +0100

252 lines

Re: Section 35

Cotterill, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 11:02:40 +0100

284 lines

Re: Section 35

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 11:46:49 +0100

86 lines

New Thread

Serious DPA Breach leads to call for prison sentences

Serious DPA Breach leads to call for prison sentences

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 08:45:24 +0100

131 lines

New Thread

Solicitor requesting information

Solicitor requesting information

Terry Hutchinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Sep 2011 11:22:19 +0100

412 lines

Re: Solicitor requesting information

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Sep 2011 11:26:13 +0100

651 lines

Re: Solicitor requesting information

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Sep 2011 11:25:33 +0100

889 lines

Re: Solicitor requesting information

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Sep 2011 11:31:25 +0100

699 lines

Re: Solicitor requesting information

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Sep 2011 11:29:24 +0100

735 lines

Re: Solicitor requesting information

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Sep 2011 11:33:07 +0100

639 lines

Re: Solicitor requesting information

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Sep 2011 12:04:40 +0100

733 lines

Re: Solicitor requesting information

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Sep 2011 12:08:53 +0100

930 lines

Re: Solicitor requesting information

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Sep 2011 12:10:07 +0100

344 lines

Re: Solicitor requesting information

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Sep 2011 13:08:39 +0100

504 lines

Solicitor requesting information

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Sep 2011 14:59:37 +0100

230 lines

Re: Solicitor requesting information

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Sep 2011 16:38:26 +0100

239 lines

Re: Solicitor requesting information

David Hirst <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Sep 2011 16:52:29 +0000

499 lines

New Thread

Straw poll on sections 8 & 9 of Schedule 7

Straw poll on sections 8 & 9 of Schedule 7

Andrew Goodfellow <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Sep 2011 09:11:03 +0100

58 lines

Re: Straw poll on sections 8 & 9 of Schedule 7

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Sep 2011 09:19:17 +0100

123 lines

Re: Straw poll on sections 8 & 9 of Schedule 7

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Sep 2011 09:29:26 +0100

184 lines

Re: Straw poll on sections 8 & 9 of Schedule 7

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Sep 2011 09:31:31 +0100

116 lines

Re: Straw poll on sections 8 & 9 of Schedule 7

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Sep 2011 09:35:08 +0100

253 lines

Re: Straw poll on sections 8 & 9 of Schedule 7

Andrew Goodfellow <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Sep 2011 09:38:07 +0100

39 lines

Re: Straw poll on sections 8 & 9 of Schedule 7

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Sep 2011 09:40:57 +0100

299 lines

Re: Straw poll on sections 8 & 9 of Schedule 7

Andrew Goodfellow <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Sep 2011 09:55:49 +0100

47 lines

Re: Straw poll on sections 8 & 9 of Schedule 7

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Sep 2011 12:34:18 +0100

102 lines

Re: Straw poll on sections 8 & 9 of Schedule 7

Andrew Goodfellow <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Sep 2011 13:50:37 +0100

35 lines

New Thread

Straw poll on sections 8 & 9 of Schedule 7 [UNCLASSIFIED]

Re: Straw poll on sections 8 & 9 of Schedule 7 [UNCLASSIFIED]

Healy, Susan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Sep 2011 09:48:15 +0100

218 lines

Re: Straw poll on sections 8 & 9 of Schedule 7 [UNCLASSIFIED]

Ray Cooke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Sep 2011 09:29:05 +0100

888 lines

Re: Straw poll on sections 8 & 9 of Schedule 7 [UNCLASSIFIED]

Andrew Goodfellow <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 09:51:04 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

subject information provisions

subject information provisions

Ray Cooke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:15:36 +0100

118 lines

Re: subject information provisions

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:27:20 +0100

347 lines

Re: subject information provisions

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:55:04 +0100

656 lines

Re: subject information provisions

Ray Cooke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Sep 2011 14:59:54 +0100

742 lines

New Thread

Subject: RE: [data-protection] Symptomatic white collar crime

Subject: RE: [data-protection] Symptomatic white collar crime

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:50:03 +0100

110 lines

New Thread

Symptomatic white collar crime

Symptomatic white collar crime

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:44:08 +0100

41 lines

Re: Symptomatic white collar crime

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:05:22 +0100

80 lines

New Thread

The ICO does enforce more than the 7th Principle. :) (Eastleigh Undertaking on use of PVP list

The ICO does enforce more than the 7th Principle. :) (Eastleigh Undertaking on use of PVP list

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:47:35 +0100

249 lines

Re: The ICO does enforce more than the 7th Principle. :) (Eastleigh Undertaking on use of PVP list

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:22:09 +0100

515 lines

Re: The ICO does enforce more than the 7th Principle. :) (Eastleigh Undertaking on use of PVP list

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:23:55 +0100

526 lines

New Thread

The Postal Services Act 2000

The Postal Services Act 2000

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Sep 2011 10:22:11 +0100

33 lines

Re: The Postal Services Act 2000

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Sep 2011 10:21:45 +0100

106 lines

Re: The Postal Services Act 2000

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Sep 2011 10:29:38 +0100

112 lines

Re: The Postal Services Act 2000

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Sep 2011 11:05:38 +0100

185 lines

Re: The Postal Services Act 2000

Chris Brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Sep 2011 11:39:18 +0100

227 lines

Re: The Postal Services Act 2000

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Sep 2011 11:39:07 +0100

303 lines

Re: The Postal Services Act 2000

Andrew Goodfellow <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Sep 2011 11:52:47 +0100

40 lines

Re: The Postal Services Act 2000

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Sep 2011 12:49:02 +0100

116 lines

Re: The Postal Services Act 2000

KPG Professional Services <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Sep 2011 13:30:41 +0100

281 lines

Re: The Postal Services Act 2000

Andrew Goodfellow <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Sep 2011 13:44:49 +0100

47 lines

Re: The Postal Services Act 2000

Andrew Goodfellow <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Sep 2011 13:47:52 +0100

31 lines

Re: The Postal Services Act 2000

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Sep 2011 11:45:18 +0100

49 lines

Re: The Postal Services Act 2000

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Sep 2011 15:53:10 +0100

212 lines

Re: The Postal Services Act 2000

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 17:13:54 +0100

52 lines

Re: The Postal Services Act 2000

Chris Spray <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 20:11:17 +0100

83 lines

New Thread

Walsall Residents Details in Skip

Walsall Residents Details in Skip

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Sep 2011 10:12:02 +0100

44 lines

New Thread

Who Has the ICO Caught in Last three months?

Who Has the ICO Caught in Last three months?

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 08:50:58 +0100

159 lines

Re: Who Has the ICO Caught in Last three months?

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:03:16 +0100

354 lines

Re: Who Has the ICO Caught in Last three months?

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:05:12 +0100

328 lines

Re: Who Has the ICO Caught in Last three months?

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:40:33 +0100

154 lines

Re: Who Has the ICO Caught in Last three months?

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:55:59 +0100

410 lines

New Thread

Witholding Social Care records

Witholding Social Care records

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Sep 2011 10:39:04 +0100

34 lines

Re: Witholding Social Care records

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Sep 2011 12:23:13 +0100

125 lines

New Thread

Worker sacked in data breach

Worker sacked in data breach

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 08:03:18 +0100

40 lines

JISCMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager