JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for RAMESES Archives


RAMESES Archives

RAMESES Archives


July 2011


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

FW: meta-narrative syst rev: responding to Farah (2 messages)
How much should we impugn when authors don't make things explicit? (7 messages)
How to persuade funders... (6 messages)
Interim Summaries (1 message)
Interim summary - Designed Blindness (1 message)
meta-narrative syst rev (4 messages)
meta-narrative syst rev: finally some Foucault? (1 message)
Meta-narrative syst rev: how many meta-narratives (1 message)
meta-narrative syst rev: responding to Farah (5 messages)
Ray's 'Designed blindness' reference (1 message)
Reaction to messges about realis review retention studies (3 messages)
Realist compared to other systematic reviews (4 messages)
Theories - local or formal (9 messages)
Theories - local or formal or blind? (1 message)
Theories - magic or material? (2 messages)
Triangulation in RS (2 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

RAMESES Home

RAMESES Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

FW: meta-narrative syst rev: responding to Farah

FW: meta-narrative syst rev: responding to Farah

Trisha Greenhalgh <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jul 2011 21:37:26 +0100

8362 lines

Re: FW: meta-narrative syst rev: responding to Farah

Colleen M. Davison <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jul 2011 20:13:41 -0300

1035 lines

New Thread

How much should we impugn when authors don't make things explicit?

How much should we impugn when authors don't make things explicit?

Trisha Greenhalgh <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Jul 2011 07:44:22 +0100

102 lines

Re: How much should we impugn when authors don't make things explicit?

Colleen M. Davison <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:29:29 -0300

145 lines

Re: How much should we impugn when authors don't make things explicit?

Gill Westhorp <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jul 2011 00:33:09 +0100

64 lines

Re: How much should we impugn when authors don't make things explicit?

Trisha Greenhalgh <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jul 2011 08:56:50 +0100

618 lines

Re: How much should we impugn when authors don't make things explicit?

Trisha Greenhalgh <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:32:01 +0100

1056 lines

Re: How much should we impugn when authors don't make things explicit?

Andrew Booth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:26:55 +0100

660 lines

Re: How much should we impugn when authors don't make things explicit?

Andrew Booth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:01:18 +0100

997 lines

New Thread

How to persuade funders...

How to persuade funders...

Trisha Greenhalgh <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Jul 2011 19:33:36 +0100

847 lines

Re: How to persuade funders...

Gill Westhorp <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:54:49 +0930

618 lines

Re: How to persuade funders...

Colleen M. Davison <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:38:14 -0300

710 lines

Re: How to persuade funders...

Marjorie MacDonald <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:49:21 -0700

683 lines

Re: How to persuade funders...

Trisha Greenhalgh <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Jul 2011 18:50:22 +0100

1440 lines

Re: How to persuade funders...

Gill Westhorp <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Jul 2011 09:23:21 +0930

972 lines

New Thread

Interim Summaries

Interim Summaries

Geoff Wong <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 Jul 2011 18:23:50 +0100

28 lines

New Thread

Interim summary - Designed Blindness

Interim summary - Designed Blindness

Geoff Wong <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 Jul 2011 19:11:16 +0100

76 lines

New Thread

meta-narrative syst rev

Re: meta-narrative syst rev

Paul Ward <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 16:33:48 -0700

61 lines

Re: meta-narrative syst rev

Trisha Greenhalgh <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Jul 2011 09:13:18 +0100

251 lines

Re: meta-narrative syst rev

Farah Jamal <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Jul 2011 09:10:21 +0100

91 lines

Re: meta-narrative syst rev

Marcello Bertotti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Jul 2011 13:08:41 +0100

413 lines

New Thread

meta-narrative syst rev: finally some Foucault?

Re: meta-narrative syst rev: finally some Foucault?

Farah Jamal <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Jul 2011 15:09:40 +0100

1682 lines

New Thread

Meta-narrative syst rev: how many meta-narratives

Meta-narrative syst rev: how many meta-narratives

Trisha Greenhalgh <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Jul 2011 06:42:14 +0100

1577 lines

New Thread

meta-narrative syst rev: responding to Farah

Re: meta-narrative syst rev: responding to Farah

Trisha Greenhalgh <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jul 2011 17:05:39 +0100

943 lines

Re: meta-narrative syst rev: responding to Farah

Colleen M. Davison <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:37:10 -0300

731 lines

Re: meta-narrative syst rev: responding to Farah

Gill Westhorp <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Jul 2011 08:20:36 +0930

796 lines

Re: meta-narrative syst rev: responding to Farah

McCourt, Christine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:13:56 +0100

493 lines

Re: meta-narrative syst rev: responding to Farah

Colleen M. Davison <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Jul 2011 09:14:14 -0300

598 lines

New Thread

Ray's 'Designed blindness' reference

Ray's 'Designed blindness' reference

Trisha Greenhalgh <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Jul 2011 19:41:41 +0100

4764 lines

New Thread

Reaction to messges about realis review retention studies

Reaction to messges about realis review retention studies

Marjolein Dieleman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Jul 2011 13:28:55 +0100

54 lines

Re: Reaction to messges about realis review retention studies

Gill Westhorp <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jul 2011 10:24:25 +0100

89 lines

Re: Reaction to messges about realis review retention studies

Baker, David R. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jul 2011 20:52:49 -0400

112 lines

New Thread

Realist compared to other systematic reviews

Realist compared to other systematic reviews

Gill Westhorp <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jul 2011 04:35:11 +0100

31 lines

Re: Realist compared to other systematic reviews

Mark Pearson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Jul 2011 14:18:37 +0100

65 lines

Re: Realist compared to other systematic reviews

Gill Westhorp <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Jul 2011 10:21:03 +0930

106 lines

Re: Realist compared to other systematic reviews

Mark Pearson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:57:26 +0100

144 lines

New Thread

Theories - local or formal

Theories - local or formal

Raymond Pawson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jul 2011 13:54:10 +0100

70 lines

Re: Theories - local or formal

BMarchal <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Jul 2011 12:37:17 +0200

120 lines

Re: Theories - local or formal

Trisha Greenhalgh <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Jul 2011 18:29:53 +0100

165 lines

Re: Theories - local or formal

BMarchal <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Jul 2011 19:56:26 +0200

186 lines

Re: Theories - local or formal

Gill Westhorp <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jul 2011 11:05:58 +0930

237 lines

Re: Theories - local or formal

Trisha Greenhalgh <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jul 2011 06:43:08 +0100

278 lines

Re: Theories - local or formal

Mark Pearson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Jul 2011 14:05:55 +0100

365 lines

Re: Theories - local or formal

Trisha Greenhalgh <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:18:57 +0100

395 lines

Re: Theories - local or formal

Mark Pearson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:25:20 +0100

426 lines

New Thread

Theories - local or formal or blind?

Theories - local or formal or blind?

Raymond Pawson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:41:43 +0100

444 lines

New Thread

Theories - magic or material?

Theories - magic or material?

Raymond Pawson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jul 2011 10:40:25 +0100

5391 lines

Re: Theories - magic or material?

Gill Westhorp <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jul 2011 11:06:57 +0100

37 lines

New Thread

Triangulation in RS

Triangulation in RS

Gill Westhorp <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jul 2011 03:15:03 +0100

27 lines

Re: Triangulation in RS

Trisha Greenhalgh <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jul 2011 06:09:52 +0100

69 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager