JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Archives


EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Archives

EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Archives


July 2011


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

'Evidence, policy and practice' - new book from The Policy Press (1 message)
**LAST FEW PLACES** Identifying the evidence for systematic reviews: an introduction for information professionals (1 message)
5 PhD studentships available at Institute of Health & Society (1 message)
5 PhD studentships available in Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University (1 message)
: NHS Chief Executive Innovation Review (2 messages)
addiction to antidepressants (4 messages)
Anecdotes versus evidence (3 messages)
Another EBCPGs Resources List (2 messages)
AW: solution to health care cost crisis: technical vs.philosphical.. (11 messages)
Baseline equivalence (5 messages)
CONSORT statement and crossover trials (4 messages)
EBM Anecdote: Today's NEJM (15 messages)
EBM Anecdote: Today's NEJM...meaning of "evidence" (2 messages)
EBM. Gibberish? (1 message)
Epidemiologist volunteer sought to improve the newspaper reporting of clinical research? (1 message)
EQUATOR seminar on RCT reporting and 2011 Annual Lecture (Bristol, UK) (1 message)
Evidence 2011 Call for Papers (1 message)
Evidence Based Medicine books (5 messages)
Evidence Farming (EF)? (2 messages)
Final call for papers - present your work at Evidence 2011 (1 message)
For all and only Clinical Librarians or Informationists who have not taken the survey (1 message)
For all Clinical Librarians/Informationists (1 message)
FW: Developing evidence-based practice in the real world (1 message)
FW: Last day to submit your paper - Deadline 13th July 2011 (1 message)
Fwd: Re: Patients worse off with more-experienced docs? In a study that flies in the face of common sense, sicker patients turned out to fare worse under the care of seasoned doctors than when newcomers to medicine looked after them. (1 message)
Fwd: [SPAM: 3.000] Patients worse off with more-experienced docs? In a study that flies in the face of common sense, sicker patients turned out to fare worse under the care of seasoned doctors than when newcomers to medicine looked after them. (2 messages)
GRADE Workshop August 10-12, 2011 in New York City (1 message)
guidelines resources according to specialties... (16 messages)
HIA on campus and online courses. (1 message)
Medical Education News: Innovator's Prescription (1 message)
New blog on evidence-based childcare (2 messages)
Patient Decision Aids (8 messages)
Patients worse off with more-experienced docs? In a study that flies in the face of common sense, sicker patients turned out to fare worse under the care of seasoned doctors than when newcomers to medicine looked after them. (20 messages)
Peto odds ratio and Chantix cardiovascular risk (9 messages)
Principles of systematic review and evidence synthesis [E-learning module] (1 message)
R: CONSORT statement and crossover trials (2 messages)
Research post in screening, diagnostic and monitoring tests (1 message)
Sample Size Question (4 messages)
solution to health care cost crisis: technical vs.philosphical.. (17 messages)
SR of diagnostic studies (2 messages)
Using Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Theoretical and Practical Issues (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Home

EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

'Evidence, policy and practice' - new book from The Policy Press

'Evidence, policy and practice' - new book from The Policy Press

Jessica Hughes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jul 2011 16:53:24 +0100

280 lines

New Thread

**LAST FEW PLACES** Identifying the evidence for systematic reviews: an introduction for information professionals

**LAST FEW PLACES** Identifying the evidence for systematic reviews: an introduction for information professionals

CRD Information Service <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Jul 2011 10:20:16 +0100

308 lines

New Thread

5 PhD studentships available at Institute of Health & Society

5 PhD studentships available at Institute of Health & Society

Martin White <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jul 2011 11:35:03 +0100

244 lines

New Thread

5 PhD studentships available in Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University

5 PhD studentships available in Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University

Martin White <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jul 2011 11:49:07 +0100

265 lines

New Thread

: NHS Chief Executive Innovation Review

Re: : NHS Chief Executive Innovation Review

Clarke, Aileen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jul 2011 14:25:52 +0100

496 lines

Re: : NHS Chief Executive Innovation Review

Poses, Roy <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:17:46 -0400

468 lines

New Thread

addiction to antidepressants

Re: addiction to antidepressants

jo kirkpatrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Jul 2011 18:38:32 +0100

130 lines

Re: addiction to antidepressants

Dr. Amy Price <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Jul 2011 14:16:07 -0400

368 lines

Re: addiction to antidepressants

Ash Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Jul 2011 13:44:18 -0700

339 lines

Re: addiction to antidepressants

jo kirkpatrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Jul 2011 23:28:02 +0100

365 lines

New Thread

Anecdotes versus evidence

Anecdotes versus evidence

Steve Simon, P.Mean Consulting <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:07:25 -0500

28 lines

Re: Anecdotes versus evidence

Dr. Amy Price <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:41:14 -0400

70 lines

Re: Anecdotes versus evidence

jo kirkpatrick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jul 2011 03:41:39 +0100

74 lines

New Thread

Another EBCPGs Resources List

Another EBCPGs Resources List

Dr. Yasser Sami Amer <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 Jul 2011 02:11:39 -0700

6124 lines

Re: Another EBCPGs Resources List

Amol Hartalkar <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 Jul 2011 15:18:50 +0530

169 lines

New Thread

AW: solution to health care cost crisis: technical vs.philosphical..

AW: solution to health care cost crisis: technical vs.philosphical..

Narath Markus, Dr. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jul 2011 12:24:25 +0200

3008 lines

Re: AW: solution to health care cost crisis: technical vs.philosphical..

Jeremy Howick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:33:27 +0100

80 lines

Re: AW: solution to health care cost crisis: technical vs.philosphical..

Bastian, Hilda (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:46:04 -0400

67 lines

Re: AW: solution to health care cost crisis: technical vs.philosphical..

Dr. Amy Price <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:05:34 -0400

119 lines

Re: AW: solution to health care cost crisis: technical vs.philosphical..

Joshua Fenton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Jul 2011 10:02:29 -0700

110 lines

Re: AW: solution to health care cost crisis: technical vs.philosphical..

Jeremy Howick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Jul 2011 20:28:44 +0100

162 lines

Re: AW: solution to health care cost crisis: technical vs.philosphical..

Bastian, Hilda (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:55:13 -0400

150 lines

Re: AW: solution to health care cost crisis: technical vs.philosphical..

Dr. Amy Price <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Jul 2011 21:44:02 -0400

706 lines

Re: AW: solution to health care cost crisis: technical vs.philosphical..

Gary Jackson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:06:13 +1200

3269 lines

Re: AW: solution to health care cost crisis: technical vs.philosphical..

Ash Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Jul 2011 22:39:00 -0700

356 lines

Re: AW: solution to health care cost crisis: technical vs.philosphical..

Stephen Senn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jul 2011 12:35:04 +0100

942 lines

New Thread

Baseline equivalence

Baseline equivalence

Benson, Teresa <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Jul 2011 06:28:50 -0700

172 lines

Re: Baseline equivalence

Stephen Senn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:56:14 +0100

391 lines

Re: Baseline equivalence

Michael Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:14:47 -0400

380 lines

Re: Baseline equivalence

Benson, Teresa <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:36:40 -0700

355 lines

Re: Baseline equivalence

Mark V. Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Jul 2011 12:23:34 -0500

855 lines

New Thread

CONSORT statement and crossover trials

CONSORT statement and crossover trials

piersante sestini <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Jul 2011 18:25:47 +0200

32 lines

Re: CONSORT statement and crossover trials

Iveta Simera <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:41:26 +0100

40 lines

Re: CONSORT statement and crossover trials

Douglas Badenoch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:47:29 +0100

65 lines

Re: CONSORT statement and crossover trials

Paul Elias <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Jul 2011 06:42:09 -0700

54 lines

New Thread

EBM Anecdote: Today's NEJM

EBM Anecdote: Today's NEJM

Rakesh Biswas <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jul 2011 09:49:30 +0530

46 lines

Re: EBM Anecdote: Today's NEJM

Bill Cayley, Jr <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jul 2011 05:49:59 -0700

96 lines

Re: EBM Anecdote: Today's NEJM

Kalliainen, Loree K <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jul 2011 08:54:36 -0500

221 lines

Re: EBM Anecdote: Today's NEJM

Bastian, Hilda (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jul 2011 11:26:28 -0400

99 lines

Re: EBM Anecdote: Today's NEJM

Hutchinson Andy <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jul 2011 16:46:07 +0100

137 lines

Re: EBM Anecdote: Today's NEJM

Justus Krabshuis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jul 2011 18:08:25 +0200

116 lines

Re: EBM Anecdote: Today's NEJM

Dr. Amy Price <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jul 2011 12:35:59 -0400

214 lines

Re: EBM Anecdote: Today's NEJM

Richard Saitz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jul 2011 12:47:20 -0400

1350 lines

Re: EBM Anecdote: Today's NEJM

Richard Saitz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jul 2011 12:51:49 -0400

645 lines

Re: EBM Anecdote: Today's NEJM

Ash Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jul 2011 12:54:59 -0700

250 lines

Re: EBM Anecdote: Today's NEJM

Michael Power <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Jul 2011 09:16:47 +0100

120 lines

Re: EBM Anecdote: Today's NEJM

Richard Saitz <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Jul 2011 12:59:02 -0400

787 lines

Re: EBM Anecdote: Today's NEJM

Dr. Amy Price <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Jul 2011 20:41:48 -0400

622 lines

Re: EBM Anecdote: Today's NEJM

Richard Saitz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jul 2011 12:06:24 -0400

1207 lines

Re: EBM Anecdote: Today's NEJM

Rakesh Biswas <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:02:27 +0530

708 lines

New Thread

EBM Anecdote: Today's NEJM...meaning of "evidence"

Re: EBM Anecdote: Today's NEJM...meaning of "evidence"

Djulbegovic, Benjamin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jul 2011 21:04:43 +0000

531 lines

Re: EBM Anecdote: Today's NEJM...meaning of "evidence"

Donna Waters <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Jul 2011 09:33:24 +1000

138 lines

New Thread

EBM. Gibberish?

EBM. Gibberish?

Richard Saitz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jul 2011 11:41:42 -0400

329 lines

New Thread

Epidemiologist volunteer sought to improve the newspaper reporting of clinical research?

Epidemiologist volunteer sought to improve the newspaper reporting of clinical research?

Stephen Senn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Jul 2011 16:19:46 +0100

64 lines

New Thread

EQUATOR seminar on RCT reporting and 2011 Annual Lecture (Bristol, UK)

EQUATOR seminar on RCT reporting and 2011 Annual Lecture (Bristol, UK)

Iveta Simera <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jul 2011 10:53:15 +0100

93 lines

New Thread

Evidence 2011 Call for Papers

Evidence 2011 Call for Papers

Olive Goddard <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jul 2011 14:38:27 +0100

345 lines

New Thread

Evidence Based Medicine books

Evidence Based Medicine books

Anoop Balachandran <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Jul 2011 01:22:10 +0100

19 lines

Re: Evidence Based Medicine books

Eddy Lang <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:41:36 -0600

49 lines

Re: Evidence Based Medicine books

Piersante Sestini <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:16:28 +0200

28 lines

Re: Evidence Based Medicine books

Maskrey Neal <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Jul 2011 18:03:23 +0100

19752 lines

Re: Evidence Based Medicine books

Max McMurdo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:27:40 +0100

61 lines

New Thread

Evidence Farming (EF)?

Evidence Farming (EF)?

Rakesh Biswas <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:43:53 +0530

49 lines

Re: Evidence Farming (EF)?

Bill Cayley, Jr <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:20:46 -0700

108 lines

New Thread

Final call for papers - present your work at Evidence 2011

Final call for papers - present your work at Evidence 2011

Kieran Walsh <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jul 2011 15:40:07 +0100

186 lines

New Thread

For all and only Clinical Librarians or Informationists who have not taken the survey

For all and only Clinical Librarians or Informationists who have not taken the survey

rasha atlasi <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:08:57 +0330

153 lines

New Thread

For all Clinical Librarians/Informationists

For all Clinical Librarians/Informationists

R Atlasi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jul 2011 07:10:33 -0500

121 lines

New Thread

FW: Developing evidence-based practice in the real world

FW: Developing evidence-based practice in the real world

Olive Goddard <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:32:05 +0100

493 lines

New Thread

FW: Last day to submit your paper - Deadline 13th July 2011

FW: Last day to submit your paper - Deadline 13th July 2011

Olive Goddard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:30:03 +0100

495 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Re: Patients worse off with more-experienced docs? In a study that flies in the face of common sense, sicker patients turned out to fare worse under the care of seasoned doctors than when newcomers to medicine looked after them.

Fwd: Re: Patients worse off with more-experienced docs? In a study that flies in the face of common sense, sicker patients turned out to fare worse under the care of seasoned doctors than when newcomers to medicine looked after them.

Nuria Homedes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Jul 2011 09:24:16 -0600

101 lines

New Thread

Fwd: [SPAM: 3.000] Patients worse off with more-experienced docs? In a study that flies in the face of common sense, sicker patients turned out to fare worse under the care of seasoned doctors than when newcomers to medicine looked after them.

Fwd: [SPAM: 3.000] Patients worse off with more-experienced docs? In a study that flies in the face of common sense, sicker patients turned out to fare worse under the care of seasoned doctors than when newcomers to medicine looked after them.

ray kirk <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Jul 2011 09:18:20 +1200

165 lines

Re: Fwd: [SPAM: 3.000] Patients worse off with more-experienced docs? In a study that flies in the face of common sense, sicker patients turned out to fare worse under the care of seasoned doctors than when newcomers to medicine looked after them.

jo kirkpatrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Jul 2011 19:16:29 +0100

121 lines

New Thread

GRADE Workshop August 10-12, 2011 in New York City

GRADE Workshop August 10-12, 2011 in New York City

Louise Falzon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jul 2011 19:21:49 +0100

47 lines

New Thread

guidelines resources according to specialties...

guidelines resources according to specialties...

Djulbegovic, Benjamin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Jul 2011 12:06:58 +0000

373 lines

Re: guidelines resources according to specialties...

Christian Lerch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:21:41 +0200

100 lines

guidelines resources according to specialties...

Ollenschläger, Günter (AZQ) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:28:39 +0200

538 lines

Re: guidelines resources according to specialties...

Dr. Carlos Cuello <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Jul 2011 09:40:52 -0500

336 lines

Re: guidelines resources according to specialties...

Ratti, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:52:28 +0000

131 lines

Re: guidelines resources according to specialties...

Justus Krabshuis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:58:40 +0200

146 lines

Re: guidelines resources according to specialties...

Ash Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Jul 2011 09:13:06 -0700

407 lines

Re: guidelines resources according to specialties...

Michael Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Jul 2011 12:42:13 -0400

1750 lines

Re: guidelines resources according to specialties...

Justus Krabshuis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Jul 2011 19:21:50 +0200

399 lines

Re: guidelines resources according to specialties...

Bastian, Hilda (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:48:33 -0400

87 lines

Re: guidelines resources according to specialties...

Irena Bond <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:07:22 -0400

125 lines

Re: guidelines resources according to specialties...

Ernesto Barrera <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:01:41 +0200

110 lines

Re: guidelines resources according to specialties...

Richard Pullicino <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:27:45 +0200

288 lines

Re: guidelines resources according to specialties...

Justus Krabshuis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:13:01 +0200

444 lines

Re: guidelines resources according to specialties...

Irena Bond <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:46:38 -0400

611 lines

Re: guidelines resources according to specialties...

Djulbegovic, Benjamin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Jul 2011 20:06:39 +0000

180 lines

New Thread

HIA on campus and online courses.

HIA on campus and online courses.

Dreaves, Hilary <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:18:06 +0000

248 lines

New Thread

Medical Education News: Innovator's Prescription

Medical Education News: Innovator's Prescription

David Cawthorpe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Jul 2011 10:54:00 -0600

35 lines

New Thread

New blog on evidence-based childcare

New blog on evidence-based childcare

Stephanie Chan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:28:04 -0700

45 lines

Re: New blog on evidence-based childcare

jo kirkpatrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Jul 2011 21:41:56 +0100

117 lines

New Thread

Patient Decision Aids

Patient Decision Aids

Jon Brassey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Jul 2011 16:04:06 +0100

51 lines

Re: Patient Decision Aids

Hutchinson Andy <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Jul 2011 16:26:15 +0100

567 lines

Re: Patient Decision Aids

Klim McPherson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Jul 2011 16:48:43 +0100

117 lines

Re: Patient Decision Aids

Vivian Welch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Jul 2011 15:59:43 +0000

375 lines

Re: Patient Decision Aids

Eddy Lang <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Jul 2011 10:41:17 -0600

424 lines

Re: Patient Decision Aids

Ash Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Jul 2011 11:34:02 -0700

526 lines

Re: Patient Decision Aids

Ratti, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Jul 2011 18:48:38 +0000

1400 lines

Re: Patient Decision Aids

Ash Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Jul 2011 12:20:40 -0700

482 lines

New Thread

Patients worse off with more-experienced docs? In a study that flies in the face of common sense, sicker patients turned out to fare worse under the care of seasoned doctors than when newcomers to medicine looked after them.

Patients worse off with more-experienced docs? In a study that flies in the face of common sense, sicker patients turned out to fare worse under the care of seasoned doctors than when newcomers to medicine looked after them.

Paul Elias <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:13:48 -0700

34 lines

Re: Patients worse off with more-experienced docs? In a study that flies in the face of common sense, sicker patients turned out to fare worse under the care of seasoned doctors than when newcomers to medicine looked after them.

Jim Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jul 2011 16:41:47 -0400

93 lines

Re: Patients worse off with more-experienced docs? In a study that flies in the face of common sense, sicker patients turned out to fare worse under the care of seasoned doctors than when newcomers to medicine looked after them.

Dr. Amy Price <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jul 2011 18:08:49 -0400

125 lines

Re: Patients worse off with more-experienced docs? In a study that flies in the face of common sense, sicker patients turned out to fare worse under the care of seasoned doctors than when newcomers to medicine looked after them.

Dr. Amy Price <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jul 2011 23:41:10 -0400

67 lines

Re: Patients worse off with more-experienced docs? In a study that flies in the face of common sense, sicker patients turned out to fare worse under the care of seasoned doctors than when newcomers to medicine looked after them.

Rakesh Biswas <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Jul 2011 15:49:40 +0530

113 lines

Re: Patients worse off with more-experienced docs? In a study that flies in the face of common sense, sicker patients turned out to fare worse under the care of seasoned doctors than when newcomers to medicine looked after them.

Maskrey Neal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:22:32 +0100

139 lines

Re: Patients worse off with more-experienced docs? In a study that flies in the face of common sense, sicker patients turned out to fare worse under the care of seasoned doctors than when newcomers to medicine looked after them.

brnbaum <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Jul 2011 08:10:18 -0700

40 lines

Re: Patients worse off with more-experienced docs? In a study that flies in the face of common sense, sicker patients turned out to fare worse under the care of seasoned doctors than when newcomers to medicine looked after them.

Stephen Senn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Jul 2011 21:00:16 +0100

72 lines

Re: Patients worse off with more-experienced docs? In a study that flies in the face of common sense, sicker patients turned out to fare worse under the care of seasoned doctors than when newcomers to medicine looked after them.

Kalliainen, Loree K <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Jul 2011 15:15:56 -0500

109 lines

Re: Patients worse off with more-experienced docs? In a study that flies in the face of common sense, sicker patients turned out to fare worse under the care of seasoned doctors than when newcomers to medicine looked after them.

Jim Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Jul 2011 17:12:49 -0400

140 lines

Re: Patients worse off with more-experienced docs? In a study that flies in the face of common sense, sicker patients turned out to fare worse under the care of seasoned doctors than when newcomers to medicine looked after them.

Ash Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Jul 2011 15:10:45 -0700

240 lines

Re: Patients worse off with more-experienced docs? In a study that flies in the face of common sense, sicker patients turned out to fare worse under the care of seasoned doctors than when newcomers to medicine looked after them.

Djulbegovic, Benjamin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Jul 2011 23:25:38 +0000

167 lines

Re: Patients worse off with more-experienced docs? In a study that flies in the face of common sense, sicker patients turned out to fare worse under the care of seasoned doctors than when newcomers to medicine looked after them.

Rakesh Biswas <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Jul 2011 14:51:59 +0530

393 lines

Re: Patients worse off with more-experienced docs? In a study that flies in the face of common sense, sicker patients turned out to fare worse under the care of seasoned doctors than when newcomers to medicine looked after them.

Djulbegovic, Benjamin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Jul 2011 12:17:07 +0000

468 lines

Re: Patients worse off with more-experienced docs? In a study that flies in the face of common sense, sicker patients turned out to fare worse under the care of seasoned doctors than when newcomers to medicine looked after them.

Kalliainen, Loree K <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Jul 2011 07:35:40 -0500

522 lines

Re: Patients worse off with more-experienced docs? In a study that flies in the face of common sense, sicker patients turned out to fare worse under the care of seasoned doctors than when newcomers to medicine looked after them.

Djulbegovic, Benjamin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Jul 2011 16:48:39 +0000

580 lines

Re: Patients worse off with more-experienced docs? In a study that flies in the face of common sense, sicker patients turned out to fare worse under the care of seasoned doctors than when newcomers to medicine looked after them.

Mayer, Dan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Jul 2011 14:40:42 -0400

459 lines

Re: Patients worse off with more-experienced docs? In a study that flies in the face of common sense, sicker patients turned out to fare worse under the care of seasoned doctors than when newcomers to medicine looked after them.

Rakesh Biswas <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 Jul 2011 15:19:22 +0530

254 lines

Re: Patients worse off with more-experienced docs? In a study that flies in the face of common sense, sicker patients turned out to fare worse under the care of seasoned doctors than when newcomers to medicine looked after them.

Dr. Amy Price <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 Jul 2011 14:35:05 -0400

355 lines

Re: Patients worse off with more-experienced docs? In a study that flies in the face of common sense, sicker patients turned out to fare worse under the care of seasoned doctors than when newcomers to medicine looked after them.

jo kirkpatrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 Jul 2011 21:17:17 +0100

552 lines

New Thread

Peto odds ratio and Chantix cardiovascular risk

Peto odds ratio and Chantix cardiovascular risk

Brian Alper MD <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Jul 2011 08:27:38 -0400

280 lines

Re: Peto odds ratio and Chantix cardiovascular risk

Paul Elias <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Jul 2011 06:28:24 -0700

251 lines

Re: Peto odds ratio and Chantix cardiovascular risk

Ahmed M. Abou-Setta, MD <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Jul 2011 08:36:30 -0600

549 lines

Re: Peto odds ratio and Chantix cardiovascular risk

Ash Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Jul 2011 08:21:53 -0700

451 lines

Re: Peto odds ratio and Chantix cardiovascular risk

Brian Alper MD <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Jul 2011 13:46:11 -0400

481 lines

Re: Peto odds ratio and Chantix cardiovascular risk

Brian Alper MD <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Jul 2011 14:43:45 -0400

727 lines

Re: Peto odds ratio and Chantix cardiovascular risk

Ash Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Jul 2011 14:34:36 -0700

695 lines

Re: Peto odds ratio and Chantix cardiovascular risk

Richard Saitz <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Jul 2011 12:42:49 -0400

2483 lines

Re: Peto odds ratio and Chantix cardiovascular risk

Ash Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Jul 2011 10:29:00 -0700

736 lines

New Thread

Principles of systematic review and evidence synthesis [E-learning module]

Principles of systematic review and evidence synthesis [E-learning module]

Andrew Booth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Jul 2011 14:07:01 +0100

44 lines

New Thread

R: CONSORT statement and crossover trials

R: CONSORT statement and crossover trials

Nino Cartabellotta <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Jul 2011 22:34:46 -0700

220 lines

Re: R: CONSORT statement and crossover trials

Paul Elias <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Jul 2011 22:53:17 -0700

195 lines

New Thread

Research post in screening, diagnostic and monitoring tests

Research post in screening, diagnostic and monitoring tests

Paul Glasziou <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jul 2011 13:19:39 +1000

34 lines

New Thread

Sample Size Question

Sample Size Question

Anoop Balachandran <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Jul 2011 13:35:45 +0100

28 lines

Re: Sample Size Question

Ted Harding <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Jul 2011 14:15:06 +0100

123 lines

Re: Sample Size Question

Paul Elias <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Jul 2011 06:35:14 -0700

54 lines

Re: Sample Size Question

Paul Elias <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Jul 2011 09:47:43 -0700

65 lines

New Thread

solution to health care cost crisis: technical vs.philosphical..

solution to health care cost crisis: technical vs.philosphical..

Djulbegovic, Benjamin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jul 2011 13:03:30 +0000

752 lines

Re: solution to health care cost crisis: technical vs.philosphical..

Jeremy Howick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jul 2011 14:30:45 +0100

1038 lines

Re: solution to health care cost crisis: technical vs.philosphical..

Stephen Senn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jul 2011 14:43:36 +0100

490 lines

Re: solution to health care cost crisis: technical vs.philosphical..

Djulbegovic, Benjamin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jul 2011 14:04:55 +0000

450 lines

Re: solution to health care cost crisis: technical vs.philosphical..

Bill Cayley, Jr <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jul 2011 07:41:05 -0700

381 lines

Re: solution to health care cost crisis: technical vs.philosphical..

Kalliainen, Loree K <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jul 2011 12:20:47 -0500

356 lines

Re: solution to health care cost crisis: technical vs.philosphical..

Stephen Senn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jul 2011 21:17:35 +0100

221 lines

Re: solution to health care cost crisis: technical vs.philosphical..

Steve Simon, P.Mean Consulting <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jul 2011 15:47:15 -0500

33 lines

Re: solution to health care cost crisis: technical vs.philosphical..

Paul Glasziou <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Jul 2011 07:22:05 +0100

108 lines

Re: solution to health care cost crisis: technical vs.philosphical..

Jordan Panayotov <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Jul 2011 18:28:16 +1000

897 lines

Re: solution to health care cost crisis: technical vs.philosphical..

Rakesh Biswas <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Jul 2011 15:18:34 +0530

965 lines

Re: solution to health care cost crisis: technical vs.philosphical..

Joseph Matthews <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Jul 2011 06:40:35 -0600

389 lines

Re: solution to health care cost crisis: technical vs.philosphical..

Dr. Amy Price <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Jul 2011 16:02:25 -0400

1031 lines

Re: solution to health care cost crisis: technical vs.philosphical..

Ash Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Jul 2011 23:01:37 -0700

374 lines

Re: solution to health care cost crisis: technical vs.philosphical..

Ash Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jul 2011 05:26:14 -0700

495 lines

Re: solution to health care cost crisis: technical vs.philosphical..

Maskrey Neal <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jul 2011 13:54:39 +0100

1674 lines

Re: solution to health care cost crisis: technical vs.philosphical..

Dr. Amy Price <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jul 2011 09:42:42 -0400

1235 lines

New Thread

SR of diagnostic studies

SR of diagnostic studies

Dr. Carlos Cuello <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Jul 2011 12:56:26 -0500

101 lines

Re: SR of diagnostic studies

Ash Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Jul 2011 14:44:54 -0700

170 lines

New Thread

Using Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Theoretical and Practical Issues

Using Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Theoretical and Practical Issues

Lynsey Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Jul 2011 14:52:15 +0100

81 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager