JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB Archives

CCP4BB Archives


June 2011


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

"Small Angle X-ray Scattering (SAXS) Techniques for Macromolecules" Webinar

Angela Criswell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:44:31 -0500

48 lines

Re: "Small Angle X-ray Scattering (SAXS) Techniques for Macromolecules" Webinar

Holmes, Meg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:38:13 -0700

41 lines

2nd P-CUBE User Meeting and Workshop on Advances in Protein Crystallization Zurich, 5-9 September 2011 - Registration now open

Mareike Kurz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:15:38 +0200

41370 lines

3-year postdoc position at MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK

Murray Stewart <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:31:24 +0100

157 lines

96-well block storage

Brian Mark <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:18:32 -0500

26 lines

Re: 96-well block storage

aaleshin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:27:47 -0700

50 lines

Re: 96-well block storage

Das, Debanu <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:41:48 -0700

71 lines

Re: 96-well block storage

Schubert, Carsten [PRDUS] <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 07:22:29 -0400

46 lines

<No subject>

Peter Burkhard <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:27:23 -0400

113 lines

<No subject>

Chelsy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:44:32 -0400

63 lines

About heavy atom split

Dhanasekaran Varudharasu <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:18:26 +0530

28248 lines

Re: About heavy atom split

Nat Echols <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:59:00 -0700

54 lines

Re: About heavy atom split

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:24:21 -0700

261 lines

anomalous difference map?

Haytham Wahba <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:50:37 -0700

50423 lines

Re: anomalous difference map?

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:48:54 +0100

65 lines

Re: anomalous difference map?

Pavel Afonine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 12:28:32 -0700

89 lines

Re: anomalous difference map?

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 15:16:23 +0200

222 lines

AW: [ccp4bb] Calculating shape complementarity (sc) parameter using CCP4

Stefan Gerhardt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 16:01:57 +0200

906 lines

AW: [ccp4bb] changing residue numbering in Coot

Stefan Gerhardt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:58:26 +0200

40 lines

Beamtime @ SLS

Meitian Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Jun 2011 10:45:10 +0200

210 lines

Calculating shape complementarity (sc) parameter using CCP4

Li Chen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 09:18:22 -0400

2594 lines

Call for paper "International Interdisciplinary Science Conference 2011"

Dr. Imtiyaz Hassan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:11:31 +0100

85 lines

CCP4 6.1.13

REX PALMER <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 22:13:20 +0100

156 lines

Change cell parameter

Zhiyi Wei <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:14:03 -0400

17 lines

Re: Change cell parameter

Vellieux Frederic <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:10:38 +0200

43 lines

Re: Change cell parameter

Dale Tronrud <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 08:37:29 -0700

51 lines

Re: Change cell parameter

Eric Larson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 08:38:21 -0700

62 lines

Re: Change cell parameter

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 08:59:11 -0700

16815 lines

Re: Change cell parameter

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 09:23:38 -0700

98 lines

Re: Change cell parameter

Zbyszek Otwinowski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:33:44 -0500

43 lines

Re: Change cell parameter

Richard Bunker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 18:30:17 +0200

96 lines

Re: Change cell parameter

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:37:10 +0100

51 lines

Re: Change cell parameter

Zhiyi Wei <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 22:53:32 -0400

61 lines

changing residue numbering in Coot

Katrina L Molland <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Jun 2011 07:13:56 -0400

16 lines

Re: changing residue numbering in Coot

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:48:05 +0100

31 lines

Re: changing residue numbering in Coot

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:46:24 +0200

57 lines

cif-file with restraints for HC4

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:06:54 +0200

31 lines

Re: cif-file with restraints for HC4

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:40:34 +0200

66 lines

citric acid + 40%MPD (pHI -H1 condition)

Jayashankar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 01:09:03 +0200

35 lines

Re: citric acid + 40%MPD (pHI -H1 condition)

Jürgen Bosch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:39:51 -0400

43 lines

Re: citric acid + 40%MPD (pHI -H1 condition)

Nat Echols <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:55:02 -0700

49 lines

Re: citric acid + 40%MPD (pHI -H1 condition)

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:06:57 -0500

47 lines

Convert .cif to mtz

Madhu shankar Madhu shankar <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:26:20 +1200

19 lines

Re: Convert .cif to mtz

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:02:53 -0700

32 lines

Re: Convert .cif to mtz

Eric Larson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 20:54:09 -0700

40 lines

Re: Convert .cif to mtz

Eric Larson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 21:00:31 -0700

53 lines

Re: Convert .cif to mtz

Madhu shankar Madhu shankar <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:08:38 +1200

16 lines

Re: Convert .cif to mtz

Phil Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:31:34 +0100

34 lines

Re: Convert .cif to mtz

Eric Larson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 08:04:37 -0700

35 lines

convert .osc file to .img

Madhu shankar Madhu shankar <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 16:48:04 +1200

17 lines

Re: convert .osc file to .img

A Leslie <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 09:21:34 +0100

37 lines

Criteria For Solvent Components

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:34:35 -0500

32 lines

Re: Criteria For Solvent Components

Jan Dohnalek <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:10:32 +0200

60 lines

cryosleeves with ID 22 mm

Jacqueline Vitali <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:20:56 -0400

94 lines

Cryotools

John R. Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:22:05 -0400

26 lines

CSHL X-ray Methods in Structural Biology Course late Oct 2011: Application deadline June 15th

Jim Pflugrath <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Jun 2011 12:47:31 -0500

39 lines

Re: CSHL X-ray Methods in Structural Biology Course late Oct 2011: Application deadline June 15th

John A. Newitt <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Jun 2011 20:01:23 -0400

22 lines

Re: CSHL X-ray Methods in Structural Biology Course late Oct 2011: Application deadline June 15th

Prince, D Bryan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Jun 2011 12:31:40 -0400

84 lines

Re: Defining an ellipse around a protein structure

Eric Pettersen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 May 2011 17:10:35 -0700

63 lines

Diamond phase III proposal. Call for Expressions of Interest. Deadline looming!

Johan Turkenburg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:53:19 +0100

60 lines

EM map sigma level.

Hailiang Zhang <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 17:24:54 -0400

25 lines

Re: EM map sigma level.

Filip Van Petegem <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:41:02 -0700

101 lines

Re: EM map sigma level.

Bosch, Juergen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 17:43:04 -0400

123 lines

Re: EM map sigma level.

Hailiang Zhang <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:11:12 -0400

72 lines

EMBO/EMBL Symposium: Structure and Dynamics of Protein Networks, 13 - 16 October 2011

Christoph Mueller <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:49:39 +0200

290 lines

Energy minimization with restrain

Md. Munan Shaik <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Jun 2011 11:48:18 +0100

56 lines

Re: Energy minimization with restrain

Boaz Shaanan <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Jun 2011 12:09:07 +0000

1157 lines

Follow-up: non-waters among structured solvent atoms

wtempel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:01:31 -0400

39 lines

Re: Follow-up: non-waters among structured solvent atoms

Jan Dohnalek <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:49:02 +0200

70 lines

Re: Follow-up: non-waters among structured solvent atoms

Pavel Afonine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:19:26 -0700

529 lines

Re: Follow-up: non-waters among structured solvent atoms

Thomas Womack <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:22:50 +0100

46 lines

Re: Follow-up: non-waters among structured solvent atoms

Robbie Joosten <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:43:20 +0200

100 lines

Fortran runtime error, Refmac

Abhik Mukhopadhyay <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:38:14 +0200

49 lines

FreeR_flag

Madhu shankar Madhu shankar <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 11:44:52 +1200

19 lines

Re: FreeR_flag

Nat Echols <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:58:31 -0700

66 lines

Fwd: Re: Question about the statistical analysis-might be a bit off topic

Kay Diederichs <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 22:59:07 +0200

341 lines

Re: Fwd: Re: Question about the statistical analysis-might be a bit off topic

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 18:14:23 -0400

65 lines

Fwd: Regarding Sel-Met containing proteing crystallisation

atul kumar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:23:12 +0530

94 lines

Re: Fwd: Regarding Sel-Met containing proteing crystallisation

Frederic VELLIEUX <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Jun 2011 08:37:10 +0200

89 lines

Re: Fwd: Regarding Sel-Met containing proteing crystallisation

Frank von Delft <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Jun 2011 08:06:35 +0100

133 lines

Re: Fwd: Regarding Sel-Met containing proteing crystallisation

Marc Kvansakul <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:04:56 +1000

141 lines

generate large symmetry model

Hargreaves, David <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:52:17 +0100

289 lines

Re: generate large symmetry model

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:08:44 +0200

120 lines

Re: generate large symmetry model

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:23:06 +0100

76 lines

Re: generate large symmetry model

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:07:55 +0000

270 lines

Re: generate large symmetry model

Petr Leiman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:36:31 +0000

82 lines

Re: generate large symmetry model

Edward A. Berry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 10:43:33 -0400

100 lines

Re: generate large symmetry model

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:46:16 +0000

91 lines

Re: generate large symmetry model

Thomas Holder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:59:42 +0200

35 lines

Ghostview in CCP4 configure interface

Tatyana Sysoeva <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:53:42 -0400

30 lines

Re: Ghostview in CCP4 configure interface

Ian Tickle <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:25:14 +0100

63 lines

Re: Ghostview in CCP4 configure interface

Tatyana Sysoeva <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:28:57 -0400

87 lines

Re: Ghostview in CCP4 configure interface

Clemens Vonrhein <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:50:00 +0100

36 lines

Re: Ghostview in CCP4 configure interface

Zhijie Li <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:30:54 -0400

479 lines

Re: Ghostview in CCP4 configure interface

Zhijie Li <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:39:57 -0400

90 lines

Re: Ghostview in CCP4 configure interface

Tatyana Sysoeva <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:44:17 -0400

166 lines

Re: Ghostview in CCP4 configure interface

Mark J van Raaij <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:25:09 +0200

66 lines

Re: Ghostview in CCP4 configure interface

Clemens Vonrhein <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:26:21 +0100

84 lines

GTP Agarose Resin

Matthew Bratkowski <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:21:02 -0400

65 lines

Re: GTP Agarose Resin

Pascal Egea <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:19:03 -0700

123 lines

Hampton's adjustable cryoloop

Zhijie Li <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 18:30:16 -0400

90 lines

Re: Hampton's adjustable cryoloop

Li, Weikai <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:33:23 -0500

51 lines

Re: Hampton's adjustable cryoloop

Frank von Delft <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 07:58:41 +0100

71 lines

Re: Hampton's adjustable cryoloop

Jim Pflugrath <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:36:59 -0500

89 lines

hello

Afshan Begum <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 02:08:49 -0700

58 lines

Re: hello

Vellieux Frederic <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:59:26 +0200

72 lines

Re: hello

Jürgen Bosch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:21:33 -0400

109 lines

Help! low resolution protein-DNA complex

Xun Lu <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:11:28 -0400

88 lines

Re: Help! low resolution protein-DNA complex

Nat Echols <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:25:05 -0700

118 lines

Re: Help! low resolution protein-DNA complex

Pavel Afonine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:42:00 -0700

50 lines

Re: Help! low resolution protein-DNA complex

Reginald McNulty <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:42:47 -0700

203 lines

Re: Help! low resolution protein-DNA complex

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:54:29 -0400

102 lines

Re: Help! low resolution protein-DNA complex

Xun Lu <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 07:57:31 -0400

34 lines

Re: Help! low resolution protein-DNA complex

Robbie Joosten <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:30:55 +0200

163 lines

Re: Help! low resolution protein-DNA complex

Jürgen Bosch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 08:45:46 -0400

105 lines

Heme binding protein

Hari Namboodiri <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:49:24 +0100

26 lines

Homology modelling

Simon Kolstoe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 09:42:29 +0100

35 lines

Re: Homology modelling

Matthew BOWLER <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:44:17 +0200

47 lines

Re: Homology modelling

Roger Rowlett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:57:07 -0400

72 lines

Re: Homology modelling

Christine Gee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:10:00 +1000

42 lines

Re: Homology modelling

Edward A. Berry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:29:27 -0400

41 lines

How can I calculate the numbers of molecules in the AU?

Paul Lindblom <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Jun 2011 12:50:32 +0200

49 lines

Re: How can I calculate the numbers of molecules in the AU?

Mark J van Raaij <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Jun 2011 13:05:46 +0200

68 lines

Re: How can I calculate the numbers of molecules in the AU?

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Jun 2011 12:07:04 +0100

51 lines

How to create a link-record

Subhangi Ghosh <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:04:31 +0100

20 lines

Re: How to create a link-record

Stefan Gerhardt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:27:40 +0200

40 lines

how to estimate bond length error from crystal structure

Tian-Min Fu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:57:45 +0100

28 lines

Re: how to estimate bond length error from crystal structure

Dale Tronrud <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:24:35 -0700

36 lines

How to feed local structures to BALBES?

Ethan Merritt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:26:26 -0700

68 lines

Re: How to feed local structures to BALBES?

Dr. F Long <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:47:53 +0100

76 lines

How to get rid of Tubulin derived from insect cell expression

Seungil Han <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 07:05:27 -0400

50 lines

Re: How to get rid of Tubulin derived from insect cell expression

Shiva Bhowmik <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 10:22:14 -0700

71 lines

Re: How to get rid of Tubulin derived from insect cell expression

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 13:32:48 -0500

56 lines

Re: How to get rid of Tubulin derived from insect cell expression

Artem Evdokimov <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:00:22 -0500

119 lines

Incubators

Ramanathan Natesh <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 07:58:24 +0100

44 lines

Re: International Symbol for sin(theta)/lambda‏

Thomas Barends <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 12:09:24 +0200

30 lines

International Symbol for sin(theta)/lambda

James Stroud <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:37:57 -0700

18 lines

Re: International Symbol for sin(theta)/lambda

Richard Edward Gillilan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:07:28 -0400

59 lines

Re: International Symbol for sin(theta)/lambda

Gerard Bricogne <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 19:24:14 +0100

78 lines

IUCr satellitte

Gloria Borgstahl <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:15:39 -0500

8926 lines

Kd's in Crystals

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:58:10 -0500

32 lines

Re: Kd's in Crystals

Edward A. Berry <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:04:40 -0400

65 lines

Re: Kd's in Crystals

Zhijie Li <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Jun 2011 18:00:31 -0400

64 lines

Re: Kd's in Crystals

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Jun 2011 23:19:34 -0500

24 lines

Re: Kd's in Crystals

aaleshin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Jun 2011 10:09:03 -0700

51 lines

Re: Kd's in Crystals

aaleshin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 07:52:24 -0700

112 lines

Re: Kd's in Crystals

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:04:35 -0500

52 lines

Re: Kd's in Crystals

Maia Cherney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:20:42 -0600

65 lines

Re: Kd's in Crystals

aaleshin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:32:02 -0700

147 lines

Re: Kd's in Crystals

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:44:50 +0100

95 lines

Re: Kd's in Crystals

Steven Herron <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:33:27 -0600

1936 lines

Re: Kd's in Crystals

George Kontopidis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:35:42 +0300

93 lines

Re: larger molecular weight shown by analytic ultracentrifugation

Chad Brautigam <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 11:37:57 -0700

182 lines

Re: larger molecular weight shown by analytic ultracentrifugation

Jerry McCully <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 12:35:32 -0700

666 lines

Re: larger molecular weight shown by analytic ultracentrifugation

Kushol Gupta <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 15:38:33 -0400

603 lines

Re: larger molecular weight shown by analytic ultracentrifugation

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 15:54:06 -0500

217 lines

Re: larger molecular weight shown by analytic ultracentrifugation

Lionel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:28:28 +0100

38 lines

late announcement: XDS maintenance release

Kay Diederichs <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2011 13:51:57 +0200

169 lines

Library description for Pentacoordinated phosphate.

pravinkumar jagtap <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:03:43 +0530

62 lines

Re: Library description for Pentacoordinated phosphate.

sujata halder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2011 13:16:39 -0400

101 lines

low res. SAD phasing

tommi kajander <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:36:59 +0300

27 lines

Re: low res. SAD phasing

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:16:50 +0200

69 lines

Re: low res. SAD phasing

Phoebe Rice <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:51:06 -0500

68 lines

Re: low res. SAD phasing

tommi kajander <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:22:42 +0300

99 lines

Re: low res. SAD phasing

George M. Sheldrick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:19:32 +0200

135 lines

Re: low res. SAD phasing

Fan, Hai-fu <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 06:02:40 +0800

332 lines

map format conversion

Masaki UNNO <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 19:57:52 +0900

248 lines

March 15, 2010 deadline- User proposal submission for Collaborative Crystallography at BCSB

Banumathi Sankaran <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 15:02:24 -0700

35 lines

Milestones in Crystallography

Lena Griese <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Jun 2011 12:43:43 +0200

46 lines

Re: Milestones in Crystallography

Frank von Delft <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Jun 2011 13:02:32 +0100

62 lines

Re: Milestones in Crystallography

George M. Sheldrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Jun 2011 14:16:29 +0200

49 lines

Re: Milestones in Crystallography

Richard Edward Gillilan <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Jun 2011 09:07:32 -0400

75 lines

MR question

Careina Edgooms <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 23:25:09 -0700

38 lines

Re: MR question

Mark J van Raaij <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:01:40 +0200

60 lines

Re: MR question

Navraj S. Pannu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:41:25 +0200

18 lines

Re: MR question

Joe Watts <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 13:49:06 +0100

20 lines

Re: MR question

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:53:28 +0100

50 lines

Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.

Arnon Lavie <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:15:51 -0500

52 lines

Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.

Filip Van Petegem <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:33:47 -0700

176 lines

Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.

Oganesyan, Vaheh <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:43:20 -0400

350 lines

Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.

aaleshin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:52:04 -0700

353 lines

Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.

Francis E Reyes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:54:08 -0600

66 lines

Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.

Bosch, Juergen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:55:18 -0400

392 lines

Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.

Filip Van Petegem <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:06:25 -0700

418 lines

Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.

Quyen Hoang <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:15:11 -0400

231 lines

Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.

Bjørn Panyella Pedersen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:19:01 -0700

28 lines

Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.

aaleshin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:20:02 -0700

474 lines

Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.

David Briggs <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:24:14 +0100

147 lines

Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.

Tommi Kajander <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:25:31 +0300

500 lines

Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.

Prince, D Bryan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:01:14 -0400

100 lines

Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.

Chun Luo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:06:51 -0700

71 lines

Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.

Justin Hall <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:08:15 -0700

223 lines

Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.

Edward A. Berry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:31:51 -0400

47 lines

Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.

Filip Van Petegem <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:33:13 -0700

583 lines

Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.

David Briggs <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 22:53:56 +0100

76 lines

Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:56:38 -0500

334 lines

Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.

Petr Leiman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 22:22:34 +0000

54 lines

Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.

Machius, Mischa Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:22:40 +0000

350 lines

Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.

Oganesyan, Vaheh <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:34:44 -0400

574 lines

Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.

aaleshin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:45:29 -0700

284 lines

Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.

aaleshin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:51:57 -0700

289 lines

Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.

Filip Van Petegem <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:56:09 -0700

412 lines

Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.

Shaun Lott <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:57:42 +0100

41 lines

Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.

Scott Pegan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:05:11 -0600

455 lines

Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.

Machius, Mischa Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:06:53 +0000

521 lines

Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.

Pascal Egea <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:17:32 -0700

154 lines

Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.

Machius, Mischa Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:21:28 +0000

646 lines

Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.

aaleshin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:21:35 -0700

411 lines

Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.

Dima Klenchin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:30:04 -0500

36 lines

Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.

Machius, Mischa Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 01:01:11 +0000

113 lines

Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.

Chelsy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:03:42 -0400

320 lines

Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.

Richard Edward Gillilan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:36:47 -0400

167 lines

Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.

Jan Dohnalek <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 08:28:08 +0200

92 lines

Re: Nanodrop versus Nanophotomter Pearl versus good old Bradford.

Arnon Lavie <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:04:06 -0500

58 lines

Neutrons in Biology 2011 - REGISTRATION NOW OPEN

Teixeira Susana <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 18:16:13 +0200

454 lines

New episode of Quips - Quite Interesting PDB Structures

Gerard DVD Kleywegt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 12:34:29 +0200

33 lines

nmr question

Lena Griese <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Jul 2011 00:20:23 +0200

27 lines

No Observed SO4 in AmSO4 Crystallizations

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Jun 2011 16:22:26 -0500

25 lines

Re: No Observed SO4 in AmSO4 Crystallizations

Katherine Sippel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Jun 2011 17:43:41 -0500

96 lines

No problems with BUSTER

"F.Xavier Gomis-Rüth" <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:32:21 +0200

1718 lines

non-waters among structured solvent atoms

wtempel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:51:21 -0400

20 lines

Re: non-waters among structured solvent atoms

Nat Echols <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:07:19 -0700

57 lines

Re: non-waters among structured solvent atoms

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:26:55 -0500

47 lines

Re: non-waters among structured solvent atoms

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:02:21 -0700

80 lines

Re: non-waters among structured solvent atoms

Robbie Joosten <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 03:09:42 +0200

86 lines

Re: non-waters among structured solvent atoms

Stephen Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:35:36 +0100

57 lines

Re: non-waters among structured solvent atoms

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:16:51 -0500

81 lines

Re: non-waters among structured solvent atoms

Edward A. Berry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:22:39 -0400

86 lines

Re: non-waters among structured solvent atoms

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:38:41 -0500

127 lines

Re: non-waters among structured solvent atoms

George M. Sheldrick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:00:59 +0200

159 lines

Re: non-waters among structured solvent atoms

Sean Seaver <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:10:19 +0100

28 lines

Re: non-waters among structured solvent atoms

Edward A. Berry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:27:52 -0400

29 lines

nVidia Quadro 4000 and the stereo bracket

Brick, Peter <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 15:44:29 +0000

31 lines

Re: nVidia Quadro 4000 and the stereo bracket

Joe Watts <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 13:53:36 +0100

24 lines

Re: nVidia Quadro 4000 and the stereo bracket

David Schuller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 09:29:48 -0400

51 lines

Off topic question. NACCESS

Armando Albert <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:25:56 +0200

14 lines

Re: Off topic question. NACCESS

Francois Berenger <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:35:04 +0900

23 lines

Re: Off topic question. NACCESS

VAN RAAIJ , MARK JOHAN <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Jun 2011 23:09:50 +0200

73 lines

Re: Off topic question. NACCESS

Iain Kerr <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Jun 2011 14:44:32 -0700

161 lines

Re: Off topic question. NACCESS

Jacqueline Vitali <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Jun 2011 18:41:08 -0400

98 lines

off-topic: Synchrotron look alike

Vellieux Frederic <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:49:54 +0200

7118 lines

Re: off-topic: Synchrotron look alike

Bosch, Juergen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 12:09:25 -0400

111 lines

Re: off-topic: Synchrotron look alike

Jim Fairman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 12:10:14 -0400

62 lines

Re: off-topic: Synchrotron look alike

Pascal Egea <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:24:42 -0700

1873 lines

Re: off-topic: Synchrotron look alike

Mayer, Mark (NIH/NICHD) [E] <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 12:43:07 -0400

13 lines

Re: off-topic: Synchrotron look alike

Ben Eisenbraun <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 12:59:19 -0400

29 lines

Re: off-topic: Synchrotron look alike

William Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:52:58 -0700

25 lines

Re: off-topic: Synchrotron look alike

Felix Frolow <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 20:09:33 +0300

42 lines

Re: off-topic: Synchrotron look alike

Derek Logan <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Jun 2011 18:55:42 +0000

45 lines

Re: off-topic: Synchrotron look alike

Harry <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Jun 2011 20:17:30 +0100

73 lines

Re: off-topic: Synchrotron look alike

Derek Logan <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Jun 2011 19:43:49 +0000

77 lines

P-CUBE workshop on Workshop on Advances in Protein Crystallization and 2nd P-CUBE User Meeting, 5 - 9 September 2011, Zurich, Switzerland

Mareike Kurz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 11:46:23 +0200

225 lines

Phase III beamline at Diamond Light Source. Call for support.

Johan Turkenburg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 17:10:00 +0100

41 lines

PhD candidate

ziad ibrahim <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:57:07 +0000

3109 lines

PhD position

Ingrid Dreveny <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Jun 2011 15:40:41 +0100

179 lines

PhD student position

Petri Kursula <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:59:39 +0200

182 lines

PhD studentships for October 2011, University of Essex

Hough, Michael A <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 14:08:08 +0000

59 lines

PhD-studentship for Structure Mining at EMBL Hamburg

Thomas R. Schneider <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 09:55:52 +0200

43 lines

Position available with Rigaku - Application Scientist in Life Sciences Division - The Woodlands, TX

Angela Criswell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:27:50 -0500

174 lines

Post-doc position in cryo-EM at Oxford

Robert Gilbert <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 10:35:13 +0100

33 lines

Post-doctoral position available

Petri Kursula <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:37:13 +0200

205 lines

Postdoc position at the MRC-NIMR, London, UK

Katrin Rittinger <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:59:14 +0100

48 lines

postdoctoral opportunity in Dallas, TX

Chad Brautigam <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 11:22:29 -0700

388 lines

postdoctoral position

Guan, Lan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:45:04 -0500

1446 lines

Postdoctoral Position - Washington University in St. Louis

Li, Weikai <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 13:01:51 -0500

26 lines

Postdoctoral position available

Brian Mark <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:22:00 -0500

257 lines

Postdoctoral Positions - Structural Characterization of Intermediate Filaments

Peter Burkhard <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:02:42 -0400

199 lines

Postdoctoral Research Fellow - Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex - Ref 292

Antony Oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:51:20 +0000

63 lines

postgraduate studentship available

Jim Spencer, Cellular and Molecular Medicine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:19:45 +0100

70 lines

Practical course in MEMBRANE PROTEINS - Registration OPEN

Dr. Isabel De Moraes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:37:33 +0000

6999 lines

Problem running shelxC/D/E

Huiying Li <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:35:59 -0700

29 lines

Re: Problem running shelxC/D/E

Boaz Shaanan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:41:34 +0000

59 lines

Re: Problem running shelxC/D/E

George M. Sheldrick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:49:45 +0200

54 lines

Re: Problem running shelxC/D/E

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:05:57 +0200

75 lines

Re: Problem running shelxC/D/E

Huiying Li <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:35:12 -0700

67 lines

Program to analyze water mediated interactions?

Zhou, Tongqing (NIH/VRC) [E] <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:16:13 -0400

153 lines

Re: Program to analyze water mediated interactions?

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:37:13 +0100

47 lines

proteases for limited proteolysis, catalog numbers

Jacob Wong <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:26:35 -0400

35 lines

Protein scientist position at Syngenta

Daniel Kloer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:19:19 +0100

44 lines

PUI session at 2012 ACA meeting

Roger Rowlett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:45:29 -0400

66 lines

PyMol APBS Tools ERRORS

Qixu Cai <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Jun 2011 13:16:20 +0800

55 lines

Re: PyMol APBS Tools ERRORS

atul kumar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 10:40:30 +0530

145 lines

Question about the statistical analysis-might be a bit off topic

capricy gao <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Jun 2011 10:44:55 -0700

23 lines

Re: Question about the statistical analysis-might be a bit off topic

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.) <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Jun 2011 11:14:22 -0700

122 lines

Re: Question about the statistical analysis-might be a bit off topic

James Stroud <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Jun 2011 21:56:30 -0700

66 lines

Re: Question about the statistical analysis-might be a bit off topic

James Holton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Jun 2011 11:16:01 -0700

87 lines

Re: Question about the statistical analysis-might be a bit off topic

Kay Diederichs <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:59:07 +0200

183 lines

Re: Question about the statistical analysis-might be a bit off topic

Ian Tickle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 11:28:50 +0100

160 lines

Re: [ccp4bb] Fwd: Regarding Sel-Met containing proteing crystallisation

tat cheung cheng <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:59:32 +0800

121 lines

Refmac for windows

REX PALMER <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:58:10 +0100

39 lines

Re: Refmac for windows

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:08:55 +0200

64 lines

Re: Refmac for windows

Ian Tickle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:47:48 +0100

91 lines

refmac problem with anisotropic Us

Matthew Franklin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:33:10 -0400

94 lines

Re: refmac problem with anisotropic Us

Ethan Merritt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:48:03 -0700

133 lines

Re: refmac problem with anisotropic Us

Pavel Afonine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:58:34 -0700

64 lines

Re: refmac problem with anisotropic Us

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:10:05 -0400

41 lines

Re: refmac problem with anisotropic Us

Robbie Joosten <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Jun 2011 00:35:26 +0200

219 lines

Re: refmac problem with anisotropic Us

Matthew Franklin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 11:50:30 -0400

81 lines

Refmac5: put restraint on only peptide bonds

Masaki UNNO <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:49:18 +0900

164 lines

Re: Refmac5: put restraint on only peptide bonds

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 09:21:52 -0400

41 lines

Re: Refmac5: put restraint on only peptide bonds

Garib N Murshudov <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 15:21:42 +0100

60 lines

regarding refinement and structure determination by MR

Ting-Wei Jiang <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:46:00 +0800

20566 lines

Re: regarding refinement and structure determination by MR

Mark J van Raaij <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:58:55 +0200

66 lines

Re: regarding refinement and structure determination by MR

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:38:39 +0100

77 lines

Re: regarding refinement and structure determination by MR

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 11:40:00 +0200

247 lines

Research Fellow Position

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 08:45:19 +0200

5580 lines

Research Fellow Position

Andreas Heine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:45:17 +0200

3173 lines

Sc calculation

Fahimeh Baftizadeh <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:22:27 +0200

2686 lines

Re: Sc calculation

Mike Lawrence <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:49:47 +1000

51 lines

SC example

Rojan Shrestha <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:44:28 +0900

109 lines

Re: SC example

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 03:26:38 +0200

105 lines

Re: SC example

Rojan Shrestha <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:35:19 +0900

69 lines

Re: SC example

Rojan Shrestha <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:43:37 +0900

80 lines

selenomethionine contact

Alexander U. Singer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:25:43 -0400

31 lines

Re: selenomethionine contact

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:55:31 -0500

53 lines

self rotation function

Careina Edgooms <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Jun 2011 06:01:06 -0700

616 lines

Re: self rotation function

Ian Tickle <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Jun 2011 14:03:42 +0100

74 lines

Re: self rotation function

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:44:01 +0100

40 lines

self rotation function

Ian Tickle <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Jun 2011 11:04:28 +0100

179 lines

Solvent channel volume measurement

Matthew BOWLER <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:40:47 +0200

28 lines

Re: Solvent channel volume measurement

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:37:42 +0200

68 lines

Re: Solvent channel volume measurement

Jiang Yin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Jun 2011 22:24:01 -0600

42 lines

Re: Solvent channel volume measurement [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

DUFF, Anthony <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:55:06 +1000

117 lines

Re: Solvent channel volume measurement [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Francois Berenger <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:58:03 +0900

54 lines

Solving the structure

mullapudi edukondalu <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:50:52 +0200

59 lines

Re: Solving the structure

Phil Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:19:49 +0100

42 lines

Re: Solving the structure

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:25:25 -0400

46 lines

Re: Solving the structure

Roger Rowlett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:53:41 -0400

83 lines

Re: Solving the structure

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:17:24 +0100

31 lines

sortwater in ccp4

Xin Huang <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:00:04 +0100

19 lines

Re: sortwater in ccp4

Phil Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:18:35 +0100

26 lines

Re: statistics of A/B

capricy gao <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 05:45:53 -0700

91 lines

Re: statistics of A/B

Rongjin Guan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 11:50:07 -0400

183 lines

Summer X-rays at the NSLS

Robert Sweet <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:54:35 -0400

47 lines

Surface complementary output

Rojan Shrestha <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 10:28:26 +0900

137 lines

Re: Surface complementary output

Mike Lawrence <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:03:46 +1000

238 lines

The Good and the Bad crystal contact?

Paul Lindblom <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:22:26 +0200

40 lines

Re: The Good and the Bad crystal contact?

Michael Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:42:57 -0700

69 lines

Re: The Good and the Bad crystal contact?

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Jun 2011 20:36:54 -0500

122 lines

Re: The Good and the Bad crystal contact?

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 10:09:00 +0100

40 lines

Re: The Good and the Bad crystal contact?

Huw Jenkins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:19:56 +0100

32 lines

Two different asymmetric units from two different crystallization conditions

Shiva Bhowmik <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:19:31 -0700

56 lines

Re: Two different asymmetric units from two different crystallization conditions

Clement Angkawidjaja <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:33:11 +0900

222 lines

Re: Two different asymmetric units from two different crystallization conditions

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:22:42 +0100

41 lines

Unit cell change - was Re: [ccp4bb] XDS question

Edward A. Berry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:07:40 -0400

133 lines

Re: Unit cell change - was Re: [ccp4bb] XDS question

George M. Sheldrick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:35:08 +0200

151 lines

Re: Unit cell change - was Re: [ccp4bb] XDS question

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:50:27 +0100

154 lines

unsubscription request

Angela (Shaoxu) Li <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:41:03 -0400

18 lines

Re: unsubscription request

Ben Eisenbraun <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:54:30 -0400

32 lines

Re: unsubscription request

Vellieux Frederic <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:48:55 +0200

31 lines

vacancy for a research scientist at the ILL

Schober Anita <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:17:24 +0200

718 lines

Very low resolution map.

Hailiang Zhang <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 19:35:21 -0400

24 lines

Re: Very low resolution map.

Pavel Afonine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 16:45:36 -0700

93 lines

Re: Very low resolution map.

Hailiang Zhang <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 19:55:00 -0400

62 lines

Re: Very low resolution map.

Ethan Merritt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 16:52:14 -0700

67 lines

Re: Very low resolution map.

Nat Echols <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 17:01:56 -0700

114 lines

Re: Very low resolution map.

Pavel Afonine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 17:02:57 -0700

163 lines

Re: Very low resolution map.

Pavel Afonine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 17:14:31 -0700

138 lines

Re: Very low resolution map.

Gregory Verdon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 20:22:15 -0400

33 lines

Re: Very low resolution map.

Hailiang Zhang <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 22:21:30 -0400

93 lines

Re: Very low resolution map.

Sanishvili, Ruslan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 12:35:36 -0500

582 lines

Waters in ADIT

Petr Kolenko <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:18:22 +0200

37 lines

Re: Waters in ADIT

Petr Kolenko <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:10:09 +0200

85 lines

Re: Waters in ADIT

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:19:39 -0400

22 lines

Re: Waters in ADIT

Edward A. Berry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:49:43 -0400

85 lines

Re: Waters in ADIT

Arnaud Goepfert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:01:45 +0200

52 lines

Re: Waters in ADIT

Robbie Joosten <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:47:55 +0200

123 lines

Way off topic.. less than 96 well culture plates in black?

Francis E Reyes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:17:35 -0600

32 lines

Workshop on Low to Moderate Resolution Structure Determination

Kay Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 16:44:41 -0500

28 lines

XDS question

Marco Lolicato <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Jun 2011 15:24:00 +0200

35 lines

Re: XDS question

Vellieux Frederic <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Jun 2011 15:50:44 +0200

78 lines

Re: XDS question

Konstantin v. Korotkov <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Jun 2011 10:59:01 -0700

76 lines

Re: XDS question

Kay Diederichs <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Jun 2011 19:29:19 +0200

52 lines

Re: XDS question

Marco Lolicato <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:16:27 +0200

69 lines

Re: XDS question

Vellieux Frederic <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:43:50 +0200

80 lines

Re: XDS question

Kay Diederichs <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:47:19 +0200

238 lines

Re: XDS question

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:12:58 +0200

104 lines

Y-Chi2 running out of chart

bie gao <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:22:43 -0400

332 lines

Re: Y-Chi2 running out of chart

Felix Frolow <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:20:39 +0300

46 lines

Re: Y-Chi2 running out of chart

Zbyszek Otwinowski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:32:44 -0500

66 lines

Re: Y-Chi2 running out of chart

Jim Pflugrath <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:34:21 -0500

100 lines

Re: Y-Chi2 running out of chart

Artem Evdokimov <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:00:24 -0500

83 lines

Re: Y-Chi2 running out of chart

bie gao <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 11:59:52 -0400

120 lines

Re: Y-Chi2 running out of chart

Shiva Bhowmik <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:42:28 -0700

160 lines

Re: Y-Chi2 running out of chart

Jim Pflugrath <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:39:38 -0500

258 lines

Re: Y-Chi2 running out of chart

bie gao <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 19:59:40 -0400

249 lines

Re: Y-Chi2 running out of chart

bie gao <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 20:12:28 -0400

268 lines

Re: Y-Chi2 running out of chart

Shiva Bhowmik <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:54:50 -0700

240 lines

Re: [CONCEAL]

James Stroud <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:34:24 -0700

126 lines

Re: [phenixbb] [Fwd: Re: elbow.join_cif_files error]

Maia Cherney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:25:51 -0600

20 lines

JISCMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager