JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


June 2011


View:

Show Author | Hide Author

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject

From

Date Sorted by Date, Chronologically

Size

Re: FW: Employment issue - Use of personal e-mail and untruths

Lynn Wyeth

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 08:38:30 +0100

51 lines

Re: Employment issue - Use of personal e-mail and untruths

Bradshaw, Phillip

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 09:34:13 +0100

640 lines

Re: Employment issue - Use of personal e-mail and untruths

Alan Stead

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 09:41:55 +0100

129 lines

Re: Employment issue - Use of personal e-mail and untruths

Baines, Jonathan

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 09:50:34 +0100

202 lines

Re: Employment issue - Use of personal e-mail and untruths

Ward, Ciaran

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 10:05:22 +0100

78 lines

Re: ICO Website and Cookies

Piers Margetts

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 11:31:39 +0100

126 lines

3rd party data known to SAR applicant

Ray Cooke

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 12:03:53 +0100

105 lines

Re: 3rd party data known to SAR applicant

Bradshaw, Phillip

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 12:11:53 +0100

335 lines

Re: 3rd party data known to SAR applicant

Cotterill, Steve

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 12:16:11 +0100

548 lines

Re: 3rd party data known to SAR applicant

Donald Henderson

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 13:04:08 +0100

341 lines

Re: 3rd party data known to SAR applicant

Bailey, Trish

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 13:19:26 +0100

325 lines

Re: 3rd party data known to SAR applicant

Harrison, Iain

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 12:54:55 +0000

697 lines

Re: 3rd party data known to SAR applicant

Maurice Frankel

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:24:55 +0100

226 lines

FW: [data-protection] 3rd party data known to SAR applicant

Ward, Ciaran

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 15:09:00 +0100

539 lines

Re: 3rd party data known to SAR applicant

Paul Ticher

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 15:39:31 +0100

110 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] 3rd party data known to SAR applicant

Cotterill, Steve

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 16:17:17 +0100

745 lines

FW: Planning files

Henley, Lee

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 17:48:52 +0100

237 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] 3rd party data known to SAR applicant

Maurice Frankel

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:07:28 +0100

746 lines

Re: 3rd party data known to SAR applicant

Bailey, Trish

Fri, 3 Jun 2011 08:25:15 +0100

119 lines

Re: 3rd party data known to SAR applicant

KPG Professional Services

Fri, 3 Jun 2011 08:56:21 +0100

432 lines

Re: 3rd party data known to SAR applicant

Marchini, Renzo

Fri, 3 Jun 2011 04:57:16 -0400

186 lines

Re: 3rd party data known to SAR applicant

Ray Cooke

Fri, 3 Jun 2011 10:40:09 +0100

688 lines

Re: 3rd party data known to SAR applicant

Paul Ticher

Fri, 3 Jun 2011 14:56:59 +0100

236 lines

Re: 3rd party data known to SAR applicant

Bailey, Trish

Fri, 3 Jun 2011 15:38:55 +0100

199 lines

Re: 3rd party data known to SAR applicant

Chris Spray

Fri, 3 Jun 2011 22:30:30 +0100

387 lines

Using Section 29 Exemptions to share data - Law enforcement authorities only

Chris Spray

Fri, 3 Jun 2011 23:54:14 +0100

179 lines

ISEB Exams

Ibrahim Hasan

Mon, 6 Jun 2011 14:04:24 +0100

47 lines

References

Phil Bradshaw

Mon, 6 Jun 2011 15:38:58 +0100

46 lines

Re: References

Scourfield, Brenda

Mon, 6 Jun 2011 15:45:07 +0100

123 lines

Re: References

Jane Holden

Mon, 6 Jun 2011 15:48:47 +0100

120 lines

Re: References

Piers Margetts

Mon, 6 Jun 2011 16:34:55 +0100

89 lines

FW: Hawktalk:Daily Mail knowingly publishes inaccurate personal data in order to weaken privacy injunction

chris pounder

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 00:15:18 +0100

207 lines

Re: Using Section 29 Exemptions to share data - Law enforcement authorities only

Harrison, Iain

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 07:50:04 +0000

550 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] 3rd party data known to SAR applicant

Andrew Goodfellow

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 08:56:20 +0100

38 lines

Re: Using Section 29 Exemptions to share data - Law enforcement authorities only

KPG Professional Services

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 08:56:53 +0100

700 lines

Re: References

David Wilson

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:00:05 +0100

223 lines

Re: FW: Hawktalk:Daily Mail knowingly publishes inaccurate personal data in order to weaken privacy injunction

Andrew Goodfellow

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:04:29 +0100

39 lines

Re: References

KPG Professional Services

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:05:12 +0100

183 lines

Re: References

Bradshaw, Phillip

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:33:17 +0100

186 lines

Re: References

KPG Professional Services

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:52:31 +0100

457 lines

Re: Using Section 29 Exemptions to share data - Law enforcement authorities only

Gibson, Martin (ICT)

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 10:45:14 +0100

937 lines

Conference Paper

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 10:51:05 +0100

31 lines

Re: Using Section 29 Exemptions to share data - Law enforcement authorities only

Chris Brogan

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 11:19:26 +0100

945 lines

Re: Using Section 29 Exemptions to share data - Law enforcement authorities only

Bradshaw, Phillip

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 11:49:10 +0100

304 lines

Re: Using Section 29 Exemptions to share data - Law enforcement authorities only

Lawrence Serewicz

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 12:55:05 +0100

923 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] 3rd party data known to SAR applicant

Maurice Frankel

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 13:40:19 +0100

67 lines

ICWI 2011 (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) - 1st call extension: 24 June 2011

Natalia Teixeira

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 12:48:16 -0400

172 lines

Re: References

David Hirst

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:21:39 +0000

181 lines

BinCam

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 09:23:33 +0100

43 lines

Cookies

Brenda Scourfield

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:00:11 +0100

32 lines

Re: Cookies

Griffiths, Ian

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:06:50 +0100

57 lines

Re: Cookies

Scourfield, Brenda

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:16:03 +0100

146 lines

Credit Card Holders - Personal Data?

Cotterill, Steve

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:18:00 +0100

173 lines

Re: Credit Card Holders - Personal Data?

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:31:51 +0100

647 lines

Re: BinCam

Mark van Harmelen

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:17:20 +0100

160 lines

Re: BinCam

KPG Professional Services

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:23:30 +0100

306 lines

Re: BinCam

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:23:49 +0100

103 lines

Re: BinCam

Mark van Harmelen

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:37:33 +0100

161 lines

Re: BinCam

Peter Dinsdale

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:39:19 +0100

529 lines

Re: BinCam aka anticipatory conformity

Lawrence Serewicz

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:41:22 +0100

663 lines

Re: Cookies

Andrew Cormack

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 12:19:57 +0000

165 lines

NUMBER PLATE CAMERA NETWORK WORRYING AND UNLAWFUL say No CCTV, Privacy International and Big Brother Watch

chris pounder

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:54:28 +0100

543 lines

Re: Credit Card Holders - Personal Data?

Simon Howarth

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:19:28 +0100

744 lines

Cautionary Contact List

Jaines, Amy

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:56:21 +0100

256 lines

New ICO Fine

Ibrahim Hasan

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 16:00:14 +0100

117 lines

Re: Cautionary Contact List

Donald Henderson

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 16:22:16 +0100

637 lines

Re: Cautionary Contact List

Baines, Jonathan

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 16:27:23 +0100

784 lines

Re: Credit Card Holders - Personal Data?

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:08:27 +0100

352 lines

Re: Credit Card Holders - Personal Data?

Ray Cooke

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:58:14 +0100

792 lines

Re: Credit Card Holders - Personal Data?

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 18:09:02 +0100

338 lines

Justifying data retention

Ian Welton

Fri, 10 Jun 2011 10:29:56 +0100

43 lines

FW: ICO news release: Customer data thieves made to pay £73,700

chris pounder

Fri, 10 Jun 2011 14:06:37 +0100

561 lines

NPM - Survey

Wilson, Deborah

Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:48:00 +0100

207 lines

FOI / EIR Charges - Can We?

Bailey, Trish

Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:39:58 +0100

222 lines

woman arrested for filming council meeting

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:51:18 +0100

90 lines

Workers Fines for Data Theft

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:55:56 +0100

44 lines

Re: woman arrested for filming council meeting

Baines, Jonathan

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 11:01:03 +0100

350 lines

Re: woman arrested for filming council meeting

Lawrence Serewicz

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 11:04:35 +0100

564 lines

Re: woman arrested for filming council meeting

Baines, Jonathan

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 11:07:52 +0100

755 lines

Re: woman arrested for filming council meeting

Lawrence Serewicz

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 11:17:30 +0100

884 lines

Re: woman arrested for filming council meeting

Baines, Jonathan

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 11:34:45 +0100

777 lines

The Eyes Have It!

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:50:55 +0100

124 lines

"Watch What Your Users Are Doing On Your Site, In Real Time"

Mark van Harmelen

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:32:02 +0100

72 lines

Re: The Eyes Have It!

Bradshaw, Phillip

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:43:33 +0100

368 lines

Possibly hugh data breach

Baines, Jonathan

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:06:19 +0100

182 lines

Re: Possibly hugh data breach

Baines, Jonathan

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:15:28 +0100

324 lines

Job opportunities, London or Manchester

Mark Ogden

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:18:22 +0100

182 lines

Accessing email for e discovery

Stock, Sara

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:48:31 +0000

237 lines

Re: Possibly hugh data breach

KPG Professional Services

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:52:05 +0100

429 lines

Re: Accessing email for e discovery

Bradshaw, Phillip

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:10:04 +0100

503 lines

Re: Accessing email for e discovery

KPG Professional Services

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:22:47 +0100

543 lines

High Court on definition of personal data

Baines, Jonathan

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:53:11 +0100

196 lines

Re: Accessing email for e discovery

Baines, Jonathan

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:56:16 +0100

771 lines

Re: Possibly hugh data breach

Baines, Jonathan

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:59:13 +0100

520 lines

Re: Possibly hugh data breach

KPG Professional Services

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:16:52 +0100

618 lines

Possibly hugh data breach

Lawrence Serewicz

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:33:12 +0100

544 lines

HMRC and personal data

Phil Bradshaw

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:24:15 +0100

45 lines

Re: HMRC and personal data

Peter Dinsdale

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:31:05 +0100

74 lines

Re: HMRC and personal data

Piers Margetts

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:09:57 +0100

97 lines

Re: HMRC and personal data

Bailey, Trish

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:56:28 +0100

104 lines

Re: HMRC and personal data

Jane Holden

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:01:43 +0100

179 lines

Re: HMRC and personal data

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:18:39 +0100

236 lines

Re: HMRC and personal data

Bradshaw, Phillip

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:24:40 +0100

301 lines

Re: HMRC and personal data

Jane Holden

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:30:50 +0100

284 lines

Re: HMRC and personal data

Bailey, Trish

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:32:11 +0100

220 lines

Re: HMRC and personal data

Baines, Jonathan

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:38:45 +0100

297 lines

Re: HMRC and personal data

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:41:33 +0100

320 lines

Re: HMRC and personal data

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:41:45 +0100

349 lines

Re: HMRC and personal data

Andrew Cormack

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:43:19 +0000

275 lines

Re: HMRC and personal data

Bailey, Trish

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:06:44 +0100

265 lines

Re: HMRC and personal data

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:15:29 +0100

551 lines

Records Management

Paula Tighe

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:24:05 +0100

195 lines

Re: Records Management

Jane Holden

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:26:46 +0100

392 lines

Re: HMRC and personal data

Bailey, Trish

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:05:47 +0100

227 lines

Re: HMRC and personal data

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:11:15 +0100

530 lines

ICO Information Rights Strategy Consultation

Brenda Scourfield

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:22:05 +0100

27 lines

Re: HMRC and personal data

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:31:52 +0100

879 lines

ICO advice on dealing with spam texts

Ibrahim Hasan

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:51:19 +0100

39 lines

ETHICOMP Latin America - Call for Papers

CCSR Web Master

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:39:58 +0100

227 lines

ICO warns banks

Ibrahim Hasan

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:46:40 +0100

43 lines

2011 Census Hacked?

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:57:07 +0100

42 lines

Re: 2011 Census Hacked?

Simon Howarth

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:34:59 +0100

76 lines

Re: 2011 Census Hacked?

Bradshaw, Phillip

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:57:35 +0100

143 lines

Re: 2011 Census Hacked?

Karen McCullagh

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:43:00 +0100

196 lines

Re: 2011 Census Hacked?

Scourfield, Brenda

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:46:24 +0100

319 lines

Re: 2011 Census Hacked?

Simon Howarth

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:47:06 +0100

226 lines

UK Government Secure email suffixes

Simon Howarth

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:58:05 +0100

356 lines

Re: 2011 Census Hacked?

Mark van Harmelen

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:58:14 +0100

236 lines

Re: 2011 Census Hacked?

Simon Howarth

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:00:41 +0100

447 lines

Re: UK Government Secure email suffixes

Simon Howarth

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:01:41 +0100

51 lines

Re: 2011 Census Hacked? UK servers

Karen McCullagh

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:14:04 +0100

297 lines

Re: UK Government Secure email suffixes

Piers Margetts

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:52:17 +0100

67 lines

Re: 2011 Census Hacked?

Bailey, Trish

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:30:17 +0100

282 lines

Re: [SPAM?]: [data-protection] 2011 Census Hacked?

KPG Professional Services

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:34:19 +0100

175 lines

Re: 2011 Census Hacked? UK servers

Bailey, Trish

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:37:54 +0100

213 lines

Re: [SPAM?]: [data-protection] 2011 Census Hacked?

KPG Professional Services

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:27:10 +0100

188 lines

Names

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:00:04 +0100

49 lines

List announcement - Search engine indexing

Griffiths, Ian

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:18:45 +0100

76 lines

Press release for ESRC research project on privacy

Busch, Andreas

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 09:51:46 +0200

52 lines

Re: Press release for ESRC research project on privacy

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 09:16:48 +0100

441 lines

Sharing Data with Social Services

Jane Holden

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 09:34:09 +0100

64 lines

Re: Sharing Data with Social Services

Bradshaw, Phillip

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:06:18 +0100

127 lines

Fwd: Police Oracle Article

Ibrahim Hasan

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 13:36:58 +0100

358 lines

New Cookie Laws

Ibrahim Hasan

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:40:21 +0100

89 lines

Mick Gorril speaks

Ibrahim Hasan

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 08:41:52 +0100

43 lines

Re: New Cookie Laws

Donald Henderson

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 08:58:09 +0100

318 lines

Re: New Cookie Laws

Ibrahim Hasan

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:31:52 +0100

315 lines

Re: Mick Gorril speaks

Baines, Jonathan

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 10:00:50 +0100

117 lines

Travel Lodge lose data

Brenda Scourfield

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:23:33 +0100

27 lines

Re: Mick Gorril speaks

Lawrence Serewicz

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:38:12 +0100

171 lines

Re: Mick Gorril speaks

Baines, Jonathan

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:55:45 +0100

195 lines

student videoing teachers (or other students) and posting the videos

Lawrence Serewicz

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 13:56:00 +0100

51 lines

Re: Mick Gorril speaks

Lawrence Serewicz

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 13:57:03 +0100

242 lines

another council data breach

Ibrahim Hasan

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:31:02 +0100

41 lines

Corporate Records Manager Vacancy - Westminster City Council

Catherine Preston

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:58:20 +0100

33 lines

Re: Travel Lodge lose data

KPG Professional Services

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:12:42 +0100

154 lines

Data Subject Access Request for shared data

Michelle Peel

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:31:33 +0100

56 lines

Re: Data Subject Access Request for shared data

Paul Ticher

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:38:26 +0100

100 lines

Re: Data Subject Access Request for shared data

Donald Henderson

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:39:33 +0100

129 lines

International data transfers

Ibrahim Hasan

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 17:07:42 +0100

88 lines

Re: Data Subject Access Request for shared data

Simon Howarth

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 20:27:49 +0100

165 lines

FW: Hawktalk: Personal data and DNA retention: U turn ahoy with Freedoms Bill?

Chris Pounder

Tue, 28 Jun 2011 01:20:25 +0100

170 lines

Offside Ref!

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:22:02 +0100

42 lines

PG Dip/MSc Information & Records Management, Northumbria University

E Lomas

Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:48:43 +0100

80 lines

ADV MSc in Health Information Governance

Simon Howarth

Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:03:14 +0100

45 lines

Final ICO Data Sharing Code

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:30:08 +0100

46 lines

Yahoo! to follow gmail in scanning emails

KPG Professional Services

Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:42:57 +0100

111 lines

Tape recordings during formal meetings?

Jamie Bateman

Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:57:45 +0100

276 lines

Re: Tape recordings during formal meetings?

KPG Professional Services

Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:25:55 +0100

363 lines

Re: Tape recordings during formal meetings?

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:35:57 +0100

554 lines

Re: Tape recordings during formal meetings?

Maurice Frankel

Wed, 29 Jun 2011 18:31:48 +0100

553 lines

Re: Tape recordings during formal meetings?

Bradshaw, Phillip

Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:21:21 +0100

884 lines

Re: Tape recordings during formal meetings?

Jane Holden

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 08:48:34 +0100

404 lines

Re: Tape recordings during formal meetings?

Harrison, Iain

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 07:54:23 +0000

448 lines

Re: Tape recordings during formal meetings?

Bailey, Trish

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:33:36 +0100

431 lines

Re: Tape recordings during formal meetings?

KPG Professional Services

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:42:22 +0100

846 lines

Re: Tape recordings during formal meetings?

David Wilson

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:47:23 +0100

529 lines

Privacy Impact Assessment on Child Death Overview sharing arrangements

Michelle Peel

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:04:27 +0100

46 lines

Re: Tape recordings during formal meetings?

Roland Perry

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:40:58 +0100

38 lines

Re: Tape recordings during formal meetings?

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:52:16 +0100

106 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager