JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for FSL Archives


FSL Archives

FSL Archives


May 2011


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

3 between x 2 within factor design for Feat (1 message)
a bash shell script for automated preprocessing (4 messages)
About quality metric of FLIRT registration (6 messages)
About randomise number in TBSS (2 messages)
about registration based on DWI image (2 messages)
adding a covariate (1 message)
Announcement: MICCAI 2011 Workshop on Multi-Atlas Labeling and Statistical Fusion (1 message)
ANOVA -1 factor 4 level for VBM (3 messages)
ANOVA with non-timeseries data (2 messages)
Atlas Structures (2 messages)
average mask (2 messages)
averaging bedpostx directories (2 messages)
AW: [FSL] AW: [FSL] Highly negatively correlated waytotal and average FA (1 message)
AW: [FSL] Highly negatively correlated waytotal and average FA (2 messages)
BET for vbm (1 message)
BET With A Large Data Sample (3 messages)
Binary vs Weighted Masks (2 messages)
Brain segmentation (2 messages)
Call for papers: Special Issue of Twin Research and Human Genetics on The Genetics of Brain Imaging Phenotypes. (1 message)
Changes in FSL for Debian/Ubuntu (was: FSL 4.1.8) (1 message)
children atlas (2 messages)
Cluster based thresholding after fsl_glm (4 messages)
Cluster Thresholding (5 messages)
Comparing correlations within subjects across time (2 messages)
compute tstat from correlation (fsl_sbca)? (1 message)
contrast masking with more than one contrast (1 message)
Contrast matrix-FSL VBM (7 messages)
conversion of TFCE image into voxel-wise p-values (2 messages)
Correlation Randomise (6 messages)
Correlational analysis query (4 messages)
design.con has insufficient data points (2 messages)
design.lcon file problem with 3rd level feat analysis (2 messages)
dicom to nifti (8 messages)
Dicomviewer for Linux? (2 messages)
Diffusion withed imaging data (3 messages)
Dual regression / randomise - how to deal with outliers (2 messages)
dual regression results (1 message)
dual regression: units of stage 3 result, thresholding and correction (2 messages)
duration of tbss_3_postreg -T (1 message)
dyads*_dispersion (2 messages)
Easythresh_conj - uncorrected p-values possible? (3 messages)
Easythresh_conj3 - is it still available? (1 message)
ECoG analysis job in San Diego (1 message)
eddy_correct affine registration (7 messages)
Empty stats dir (3 messages)
Extract parietal lobe mask from MNI structural atlas (2 messages)
Fast tool (1 message)
FEAT High Level Analyses (2 messages)
fieldmap for EPI distortion (8 messages)
FIRST and convention (4 messages)
FIRST query - checking segmentations via slicesdir (3 messages)
FIRST shape analysis, correlation and statistical interpretation (4 messages)
FIRST using FLAIR images (7 messages)
FIRST with FLAIR (1 message)
fitted model line (fslview) (2 messages)
Flirt EPI to T1w (4 messages)
FNIRT - detecting volume changes in the hippocampus (3 messages)
FNIRT DIF2STR (2 messages)
FNIRT on MNI 1mm (3 messages)
FSL 4.1.8 (4 messages)
FSL Digest - 25 May 2011 to 26 May 2011 (#2011-142) (1 message)
fsl VBM -clusters (1 message)
FSL version tool (2 messages)
fslmaths bptf - temporal bandpass filtering (2 messages)
fslview and medcon .nii files (5 messages)
fslview problem (3 messages)
Functional Neuroimaging Research Assistantship at UCLA (1 message)
FW: Re: [FSL] questions about FIRST segmentation faults (16 messages)
generating reg_standard directory and log- directories (6 messages)
Grid computing (6 messages)
Help with fslstats error (1 message)
help! repeated measures with covariate in FEAT (14 messages)
help!TBSS voxelwise statistics (Glm_gui) error (4 messages)
higher-level issue (2 messages)
Highly negatively correlated waytotal and average FA (11 messages)
How to calculate b-matrix (4 messages)
How to generate GE MRI with POSSUM (5 messages)
ICA axial view (5 messages)
ICA in FDG-PET data (1 message)
If waytotal is the one... (5 messages)
import Slicer linear registration transform.tfm file in FSL... (1 message)
intensity normalisation in melodic / overfitting (2 messages)
Interaction between 2 continuous variables (1 message)
Job announcement: Postdoctoral or PhD position in Tuebingen (1 message)
Job Announcement: Postdoctoral Position at Children’s National Medical Center (1 message)
Job Opening: Research Assistant/Lab Manager Position at Harvard University (1 message)
Job Openings at CUBRIC, Cardiff, UK (1 message)
job opportunity (1 message)
large design matrices in FEAT (1 message)
longitudinal VBM (2 messages)
mask for randomise after tbss sym (3 messages)
Masks (2 messages)
Measure the anterior cingulate using FIRST? (4 messages)
Melodic problems (2 messages)
Melodic registration problem (1 message)
Melodic registration question (2 messages)
Melodic: PCA eigenvalues stored? (9 messages)
melodic_oIC and melodic_IC (2 messages)
Minimum directions required for FDT-PROBTRACKX (4 messages)
NEURO-BUREAU: ADHD-200 Processed Data New Additions (1 message)
Neuroinformatics 2011 - Early bird deadline June 1 (1 message)
Neuroscience software survey: What is popular, what has problems? Immediate results (1 message)
newborn atlas (5 messages)
nonlinear solver for dtifit (2 messages)
older version fsl (4.0.2) (13 messages)
One factor three levels (8 messages)
One factor three levels vs 3 pairwise comparisons (2 messages)
PET design matrix - interaction (2 messages)
Post-Stats Table (2 messages)
Postdoc position available in clinical neuroscience and neuroimaging (1 message)
PostDoc- and PhD-positions at the Central Institute of Mental Health in Germany (ZI Mannheim) (1 message)
Postdoctoral fellowship in pain neuroimaging at University of Maryland Baltimore (1 message)
Postdoctoral fellowships at Oxford University on brain basis of visual attention and associative processing and disruption and retraining of these mechanisms in anxiety (1 message)
Postdoctoral Scholar positions at USC (1 message)
poststats inquiry pls (3 messages)
PPI combine runs (2 messages)
Prestats error (1 message)
Principal Components analysis (1 message)
problem wit bedpostx (7 messages)
problem with fslvbm_2_template gray matter segmentation (1 message)
problem with fslview (1 message)
problem with SGE queue manager? (3 messages)
probtrack : waypoint vs termination (8 messages)
Probtrackx segmentation fault (2 messages)
qboot (1 message)
question (9 messages)
Question About Converting Probability maps in Z-stat maps (2 messages)
Question about segmentation with freesurfer (3 messages)
questions about FIRST segmentation faults (3 messages)
Randmise and multiple comparsions in FLAME (2 messages)
randomise + TFCE clarification (3 messages)
Randomise Interaction (4 messages)
Randomise- multiple mask options? (2 messages)
randomise: p value in the corrected volume, positive or negative? (2 messages)
Re : Total Intracranial Volume & files in struc for FSLVBM (2 messages)
Re : [FSL] BET for vbm (1 message)
Re : [FSL] crossing fibers (3 messages)
Re : [FSL] Definition of dti_MO (Mode of Anisotropy) in dtifit (1 message)
Re : [FSL] longitudinal VBM (4 messages)
Re : [FSL] problem with fslvbm_2_template gray matter segmentation (1 message)
Reg Multiple comparison correction.......P value significance level...... (4 messages)
Registration (2 messages)
Registration of Oxford thalamic connectivity atlas into subject space (4 messages)
removing components after group ICA (5 messages)
removing components after group MELODIC -- third attempts (2 messages)
resting state analysis design setup (1 message)
Resting state and drug infusion (4 messages)
Rotation of b-vectors (3 messages)
Running a very large anova (1 message)
segmentation error (6 messages)
Setting up an analysis with multiple sessions/runs (10 messages)
SGE timing issue (2 messages)
Shift image value (3 messages)
slicer edge not seen with -l render1 (10 messages)
SPM and FEAT FSL (13 messages)
Structural Neuroimaging Research Assistantship at UCLA (1 message)
Stunning differneces between 2 different tbss analyses (6 messages)
switching from FSL4.1.4_32bits to FSL4.1.4_64bits (4 messages)
TBSS (3 messages)
tbss statistics using mask (2 messages)
TBSS with FA maps with different slice sizes (1 message)
TBSS-Effect of data up-sampling on group comparisons (1 message)
tbss_3 failed to find header (5 messages)
TBSS_non_FA memory error (3 messages)
TBSS_non_FA memory error - SOLVED (1 message)
TFCE power analysis (3 messages)
TFCE power calculation (3 messages)
Tutorial FDT - Tractography Practical (3 messages)
using fslmaths to create an roi (3 messages)
vertex analysis F-values (11 messages)
Viewing spm8 results in spm5 (2 messages)
whole-brain and ROI inconsistency (3 messages)
Within-Group Feat Inquiry? Am I being too liberal? (12 messages)
[Announce] Python in Neuroscience satellite 2011 (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

FSL Home

FSL Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

3 between x 2 within factor design for Feat

3 between x 2 within factor design for Feat

Juan Dominguez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 May 2011 15:21:26 +0100

90 lines

New Thread

a bash shell script for automated preprocessing

a bash shell script for automated preprocessing

Jiook <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 May 2011 12:43:02 -0400

51 lines

Re: a bash shell script for automated preprocessing

Peter Molfese <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 May 2011 01:14:30 +0100

59 lines

Re: a bash shell script for automated preprocessing

Michael Waskom <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 May 2011 22:11:54 -0400

162 lines

Re: a bash shell script for automated preprocessing

David Gutman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 May 2011 22:25:28 -0400

120 lines

New Thread

About quality metric of FLIRT registration

Re: About quality metric of FLIRT registration

Yiou Li <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 May 2011 12:16:20 -0700

97 lines

Re: About quality metric of FLIRT registration

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 May 2011 20:21:49 +0100

115 lines

Re: About quality metric of FLIRT registration

Yiou Li <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 May 2011 14:57:59 -0700

126 lines

Re: About quality metric of FLIRT registration

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 May 2011 07:04:42 +0100

149 lines

Re: About quality metric of FLIRT registration

Yiou Li <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 May 2011 12:22:33 -0700

404 lines

Re: About quality metric of FLIRT registration

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 May 2011 17:04:07 +0100

239 lines

New Thread

About randomise number in TBSS

About randomise number in TBSS

dti mic <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 May 2011 11:13:06 +0800

52 lines

Re: About randomise number in TBSS

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 May 2011 08:19:41 -0400

110 lines

New Thread

about registration based on DWI image

about registration based on DWI image

Yibao Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 May 2011 11:34:20 -0400

43 lines

Re: about registration based on DWI image

Stamatios Sotiropoulos <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 May 2011 16:59:01 +0100

55 lines

New Thread

adding a covariate

adding a covariate

Amy <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 May 2011 23:06:39 +0100

22 lines

New Thread

Announcement: MICCAI 2011 Workshop on Multi-Atlas Labeling and Statistical Fusion

Announcement: MICCAI 2011 Workshop on Multi-Atlas Labeling and Statistical Fusion

Bennett Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 May 2011 14:46:49 +0100

106 lines

New Thread

ANOVA -1 factor 4 level for VBM

ANOVA -1 factor 4 level for VBM

Rajagopalan, Venkateswaran <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 May 2011 11:54:17 -0400

166 lines

Re: ANOVA -1 factor 4 level for VBM

Michael Harms <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 May 2011 11:49:51 -0500

100 lines

Re: ANOVA -1 factor 4 level for VBM

Rajagopalan, Venkateswaran <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 May 2011 12:56:41 -0400

141 lines

New Thread

ANOVA with non-timeseries data

ANOVA with non-timeseries data

Maren Strenziok <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 May 2011 14:38:53 +0100

22 lines

Re: ANOVA with non-timeseries data

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 May 2011 10:56:54 +0100

38 lines

New Thread

Atlas Structures

Atlas Structures

Rita Elena Loiotile <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 May 2011 13:35:16 -0400

15 lines

Re: Atlas Structures

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 May 2011 19:00:10 +0100

39 lines

New Thread

average mask

average mask

Adil Javed <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 May 2011 03:57:41 -0700

24 lines

Re: average mask

wolf zinke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 May 2011 15:21:51 +0200

43 lines

New Thread

averaging bedpostx directories

averaging bedpostx directories

András Jakab MD <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 May 2011 22:40:52 +0200

63 lines

Re: averaging bedpostx directories

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 May 2011 16:20:26 -0500

309 lines

New Thread

AW: [FSL] AW: [FSL] Highly negatively correlated waytotal and average FA

AW: [FSL] AW: [FSL] Highly negatively correlated waytotal and average FA

Andreas Bartsch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 May 2011 18:04:17 +0200

248 lines

New Thread

AW: [FSL] Highly negatively correlated waytotal and average FA

AW: [FSL] Highly negatively correlated waytotal and average FA

Andreas Bartsch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 May 2011 11:56:28 +0200

201 lines

Re: AW: [FSL] Highly negatively correlated waytotal and average FA

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 May 2011 10:50:17 -0500

219 lines

New Thread

BET for vbm

BET for vbm

Agnieszka Burzynska <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 May 2011 17:06:49 +0200

19 lines

New Thread

BET With A Large Data Sample

BET With A Large Data Sample

Jennie Lambert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 May 2011 00:19:43 +0100

22 lines

Re: BET With A Large Data Sample

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 May 2011 18:56:20 -0500

39 lines

Re: BET With A Large Data Sample

Jennie Lambert <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2011 00:18:19 +0100

16 lines

New Thread

Binary vs Weighted Masks

Binary vs Weighted Masks

Edward H Patzelt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 May 2011 21:18:33 +0100

17 lines

Re: Binary vs Weighted Masks

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 May 2011 10:37:46 +0100

27 lines

New Thread

Brain segmentation

Brain segmentation

Suchada Tantisatirapong <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 May 2011 17:09:40 +0100

103 lines

Re: Brain segmentation

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 May 2011 17:59:39 +0100

42 lines

New Thread

Call for papers: Special Issue of Twin Research and Human Genetics on The Genetics of Brain Imaging Phenotypes.

Call for papers: Special Issue of Twin Research and Human Genetics on The Genetics of Brain Imaging Phenotypes.

Greig de Zubicaray <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 May 2011 09:47:13 +1000

270 lines

New Thread

Changes in FSL for Debian/Ubuntu (was: FSL 4.1.8)

Changes in FSL for Debian/Ubuntu (was: FSL 4.1.8)

Michael Hanke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 May 2011 16:00:19 -0400

44 lines

New Thread

children atlas

children atlas

Nancy Estevez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 May 2011 08:15:36 -0500

24 lines

Re: children atlas

Satrajit Ghosh <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 May 2011 08:18:27 -0400

95 lines

New Thread

Cluster based thresholding after fsl_glm

Cluster based thresholding after fsl_glm

Patrick Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 May 2011 23:05:41 +1200

41 lines

Re: Cluster based thresholding after fsl_glm

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 May 2011 06:56:54 +0100

109 lines

Re: Cluster based thresholding after fsl_glm

Patrick Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 May 2011 12:32:28 +1200

121 lines

Re: Cluster based thresholding after fsl_glm

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 May 2011 06:29:05 +0100

193 lines

New Thread

Cluster Thresholding

Cluster Thresholding

David C <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 May 2011 19:24:57 +0100

28 lines

Re: Cluster Thresholding

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 May 2011 09:05:21 -0400

118 lines

Re: Cluster Thresholding

Monica Giraldo <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 May 2011 17:00:13 +0200

64 lines

Re: Cluster Thresholding

Dave Chester <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2011 15:56:07 +0100

18 lines

Re: Cluster Thresholding

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 May 2011 08:16:54 -0400

89 lines

New Thread

Comparing correlations within subjects across time

Comparing correlations within subjects across time

Fadel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 May 2011 15:54:57 +0100

49 lines

Re: Comparing correlations within subjects across time

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 May 2011 04:30:16 +0100

156 lines

New Thread

compute tstat from correlation (fsl_sbca)?

compute tstat from correlation (fsl_sbca)?

bettyann <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 May 2011 19:29:40 +0100

29 lines

New Thread

contrast masking with more than one contrast

Re: contrast masking with more than one contrast

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 May 2011 09:05:14 +0100

90 lines

New Thread

Contrast matrix-FSL VBM

Contrast matrix-FSL VBM

Rajagopalan, Venkateswaran <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 May 2011 09:58:46 -0400

217 lines

Re: Contrast matrix-FSL VBM

Michael Harms <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 May 2011 09:22:22 -0500

109 lines

Re: Contrast matrix-FSL VBM

Rajagopalan, Venkateswaran <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 May 2011 10:51:49 -0400

217 lines

Re: Contrast matrix-FSL VBM

Michael Harms <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 May 2011 10:13:44 -0500

210 lines

Re: Contrast matrix-FSL VBM

Rajagopalan, Venkateswaran <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 May 2011 11:33:57 -0400

288 lines

Re: Contrast matrix-FSL VBM

Michael Harms <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 May 2011 11:06:49 -0500

264 lines

Re: Contrast matrix-FSL VBM

Rajagopalan, Venkateswaran <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 May 2011 14:25:53 -0400

342 lines

New Thread

conversion of TFCE image into voxel-wise p-values

conversion of TFCE image into voxel-wise p-values

James Reilly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 May 2011 19:15:29 +0100

33 lines

Re: conversion of TFCE image into voxel-wise p-values

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 May 2011 12:35:50 +0100

45 lines

New Thread

Correlation Randomise

Correlation Randomise

R. Duke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 May 2011 17:44:12 +0100

42 lines

Re: Correlation Randomise

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 May 2011 20:12:08 +0100

53 lines

Re: Correlation Randomise

R Duke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 May 2011 09:17:37 -0700

103 lines

Re: Correlation Randomise

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 May 2011 16:46:52 +0100

96 lines

Re: Correlation Randomise

bart peters <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 May 2011 18:44:43 +0000

197 lines

Re: Correlation Randomise

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 May 2011 09:23:54 +0100

234 lines

New Thread

Correlational analysis query

Correlational analysis query

Reem Jan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 May 2011 12:00:02 +1200

215 lines

Re: Correlational analysis query

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 May 2011 04:31:51 +0100

225 lines

Re: Correlational analysis query

Reem Jan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 May 2011 15:52:45 +1200

487 lines

Re: Correlational analysis query

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 May 2011 12:35:14 +0200

514 lines

New Thread

design.con has insufficient data points

design.con has insufficient data points

Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 May 2011 08:50:10 +0100

600 lines

Re: design.con has insufficient data points

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 May 2011 10:15:51 +0200

1165 lines

New Thread

design.lcon file problem with 3rd level feat analysis

design.lcon file problem with 3rd level feat analysis

Tony Goldstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 May 2011 19:22:26 +0100

68 lines

Re: design.lcon file problem with 3rd level feat analysis

Tony Goldstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 May 2011 20:08:51 +0100

17 lines

New Thread

dicom to nifti

dicom to nifti

David Soto <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2011 17:00:58 +0100

24 lines

Re: dicom to nifti

Chuck Theobald <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2011 09:06:33 -0700

38 lines

Re: dicom to nifti

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2011 17:15:34 +0100

65 lines

Re: dicom to nifti

David Soto <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2011 19:14:48 +0100

494 lines

Re: dicom to nifti

David Soto <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2011 19:19:12 +0100

488 lines

Re: dicom to nifti

David Gutman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2011 14:26:07 -0400

46 lines

Re: dicom to nifti

David Soto <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2011 19:39:25 +0100

23 lines

Re: dicom to nifti

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2011 20:27:25 +0100

43 lines

New Thread

Dicomviewer for Linux?

Dicomviewer for Linux?

Finn Lennartsson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 May 2011 07:30:29 +0200

19 lines

Re: Dicomviewer for Linux?

Eric Earl <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 May 2011 10:07:42 -0700

41 lines

New Thread

Diffusion withed imaging data

Diffusion withed imaging data

Moran Artzi <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 May 2011 15:01:17 +0100

16 lines

Re: Diffusion withed imaging data

Stamatios Sotiropoulos <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 May 2011 15:10:28 +0100

38 lines

Re: Diffusion withed imaging data

Moran Artzi <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 May 2011 16:17:50 +0200

73 lines

New Thread

Dual regression / randomise - how to deal with outliers

Dual regression / randomise - how to deal with outliers

Cornelius Werner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 May 2011 21:24:48 +0200

34 lines

Re: Dual regression / randomise - how to deal with outliers

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 May 2011 08:19:47 +0100

133 lines

New Thread

dual regression results

Re: dual regression results

Fernanda Rueda <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2011 20:21:18 +0000

513 lines

New Thread

dual regression: units of stage 3 result, thresholding and correction

dual regression: units of stage 3 result, thresholding and correction

Kathryn Cullen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 May 2011 22:08:27 +0100

33 lines

Re: dual regression: units of stage 3 result, thresholding and correction

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 May 2011 18:20:30 -0400

56 lines

New Thread

duration of tbss_3_postreg -T

duration of tbss_3_postreg -T

Josselin Houenou <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 May 2011 06:22:06 +0100

19 lines

New Thread

dyads*_dispersion

dyads*_dispersion

Laura Mancini <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 May 2011 17:36:47 +0100

35 lines

Re: dyads*_dispersion

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 May 2011 17:52:50 +0100

49 lines

New Thread

Easythresh_conj - uncorrected p-values possible?

Easythresh_conj - uncorrected p-values possible?

Cornelius Werner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 May 2011 11:50:30 +0200

27 lines

Re: Easythresh_conj - uncorrected p-values possible?

Thomas Nichols <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 May 2011 22:16:40 +0100

133 lines

Re: Easythresh_conj - uncorrected p-values possible?

Cornelius Werner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 May 2011 08:39:21 +0200

120 lines

New Thread

Easythresh_conj3 - is it still available?

Easythresh_conj3 - is it still available?

Cornelius Werner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 May 2011 11:44:20 +0200

23 lines

New Thread

ECoG analysis job in San Diego

ECoG analysis job in San Diego

Thesen, Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 May 2011 17:51:59 -0400

144 lines

New Thread

eddy_correct affine registration

eddy_correct affine registration

Tyler <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 May 2011 13:02:07 +0100

30 lines

Re: eddy_correct affine registration

Stamatios Sotiropoulos <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 May 2011 15:18:36 +0100

53 lines

Re: eddy_correct affine registration

Dr T.M. Rolheiser <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 May 2011 16:01:07 +0100

72 lines

Re: eddy_correct affine registration

Stamatios Sotiropoulos <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 May 2011 16:19:03 +0100

77 lines

Re: eddy_correct affine registration

[Seongjin] <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 May 2011 11:28:17 -0400

171 lines

Re: eddy_correct affine registration

Dr T.M. Rolheiser <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 May 2011 16:31:31 +0100

86 lines

Re: eddy_correct affine registration

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 May 2011 16:45:51 +0100

88 lines

New Thread

Empty stats dir

Empty stats dir

Sean McWhinney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 May 2011 15:47:38 +0100

29 lines

Re: Empty stats dir

Eugene Duff <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 May 2011 16:54:45 +0100

107 lines

Re: Empty stats dir

McWhinney, Sean <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 May 2011 09:02:38 -0700

64 lines

New Thread

Extract parietal lobe mask from MNI structural atlas

Extract parietal lobe mask from MNI structural atlas

Natalia Francisca <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 May 2011 16:59:13 +0100

17 lines

Re: Extract parietal lobe mask from MNI structural atlas

Stamatios Sotiropoulos <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 May 2011 17:12:19 +0100

33 lines

New Thread

Fast tool

Fast tool

Moran Artzi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 May 2011 15:26:23 +0100

21 lines

New Thread

FEAT High Level Analyses

FEAT High Level Analyses

SUBSCRIBE FSL Patricia Pires <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 May 2011 13:27:13 +0100

72 lines

Re: FEAT High Level Analyses

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 May 2011 16:15:24 +0100

220 lines

New Thread

fieldmap for EPI distortion

fieldmap for EPI distortion

Shugao Xia <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 May 2011 18:07:58 -0400

180 lines

Re: fieldmap for EPI distortion

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 May 2011 08:36:46 +0100

72 lines

Re: fieldmap for EPI distortion

Shugao Xia <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 May 2011 09:56:20 -0400

255 lines

Re: fieldmap for EPI distortion

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 May 2011 11:50:58 +0100

180 lines

Re: fieldmap for EPI distortion

Shugao Xia <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 May 2011 16:07:43 -0400

379 lines

Re: fieldmap for EPI distortion

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 May 2011 22:50:01 +0100

256 lines

Re: fieldmap for EPI distortion

Shugao Xia <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2011 10:06:52 -0400

468 lines

Re: fieldmap for EPI distortion

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2011 15:28:53 +0100

310 lines

New Thread

FIRST and convention

FIRST and convention

SUBSCRIBE FSL Anonymous <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 May 2011 15:47:07 +0100

16 lines

Re: FIRST and convention

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 May 2011 16:27:21 +0100

28 lines

Re: FIRST and convention

Charlotte Bernard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 May 2011 12:35:46 +0200

99 lines

Re: FIRST and convention

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 May 2011 11:46:30 +0100

97 lines

New Thread

FIRST query - checking segmentations via slicesdir

FIRST query - checking segmentations via slicesdir

Reem Jan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 May 2011 17:21:15 +1200

34 lines

Re: FIRST query - checking segmentations via slicesdir

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 May 2011 20:58:02 +0100

58 lines

Re: FIRST query - checking segmentations via slicesdir

Reem Jan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 May 2011 20:28:30 +1200

84 lines

New Thread

FIRST shape analysis, correlation and statistical interpretation

Re: FIRST shape analysis, correlation and statistical interpretation

Roman M <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 May 2011 20:31:12 +0000

98 lines

Re: FIRST shape analysis, correlation and statistical interpretation

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 May 2011 21:45:44 +0100

86 lines

Re: FIRST shape analysis, correlation and statistical interpretation

Roman M <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 May 2011 21:23:25 +0000

183 lines

Re: FIRST shape analysis, correlation and statistical interpretation

Tugan Muftuler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 May 2011 00:35:18 +0100

29 lines

New Thread

FIRST using FLAIR images

FIRST using FLAIR images

Gilberto Sousa Alves <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 May 2011 20:35:33 +0100

61 lines

Re: FIRST using FLAIR images

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 May 2011 20:15:22 +0100

79 lines

Re: FIRST using FLAIR images

Gilberto Sousa Alves <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 May 2011 10:26:13 +0100

19 lines

Re: FIRST using FLAIR images

Gilberto Sousa Alves <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 May 2011 10:29:26 +0100

19 lines

Re: FIRST using FLAIR images

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 May 2011 12:29:04 +0100

56 lines

Re: FIRST using FLAIR images

Gilberto Sousa Alves <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 May 2011 20:13:52 +0100

17 lines

Re: FIRST using FLAIR images

Anderson Winkler <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2011 12:59:02 -0400

105 lines

New Thread

FIRST with FLAIR

FIRST with FLAIR

Gilberto Sousa Alves <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 May 2011 20:15:05 +0100

18 lines

New Thread

fitted model line (fslview)

fitted model line (fslview)

Roman M <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 May 2011 01:22:35 +0000

57 lines

Re: fitted model line (fslview)

Martin M Monti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 May 2011 14:18:29 -0700

125 lines

New Thread

Flirt EPI to T1w

Flirt EPI to T1w

Zhongming Liu <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 May 2011 10:54:10 -0400

30 lines

Re: Flirt EPI to T1w

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 May 2011 19:17:23 +0100

54 lines

Re: Flirt EPI to T1w

Zhongming Liu <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2011 14:14:48 -0400

74 lines

Re: Flirt EPI to T1w

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2011 20:51:38 +0100

92 lines

New Thread

FNIRT - detecting volume changes in the hippocampus

FNIRT - detecting volume changes in the hippocampus

Trevor Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2011 05:13:10 +0100

27 lines

Re: FNIRT - detecting volume changes in the hippocampus

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2011 08:48:02 +0100

48 lines

Re: FNIRT - detecting volume changes in the hippocampus

Trevor Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2011 15:44:41 +0100

15 lines

New Thread

FNIRT DIF2STR

FNIRT DIF2STR

Stefano Delli Pizzi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 May 2011 21:56:14 +0100

28 lines

Re: FNIRT DIF2STR

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 May 2011 21:54:28 +0100

46 lines

New Thread

FNIRT on MNI 1mm

FNIRT on MNI 1mm

Stefano DP <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 May 2011 21:26:58 +0100

36 lines

Re: FNIRT on MNI 1mm

Jesper Andersson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 May 2011 22:44:01 +0200

42 lines

Re: FNIRT on MNI 1mm

Stefano Delli Pizzi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 May 2011 21:50:37 +0100

13 lines

New Thread

FSL 4.1.8

FSL 4.1.8

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 May 2011 10:45:29 +0100

36 lines

Re: FSL 4.1.8

Stamatios Sotiropoulos <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 May 2011 10:47:14 +0100

47 lines

Re: FSL 4.1.8

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 May 2011 10:49:28 +0100

52 lines

Re: FSL 4.1.8

Michael Hanke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 May 2011 07:43:32 -0400

24 lines

New Thread

FSL Digest - 25 May 2011 to 26 May 2011 (#2011-142)

Re: FSL Digest - 25 May 2011 to 26 May 2011 (#2011-142)

Xue Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 May 2011 18:21:55 -0500

58 lines

New Thread

fsl VBM -clusters

fsl VBM -clusters

Hannah Bruehl <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 May 2011 12:01:47 +0100

28 lines

New Thread

FSL version tool

FSL version tool

SUBSCRIBE FSL Patricia Pires <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 May 2011 15:26:20 +0100

19 lines

Re: FSL version tool

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 May 2011 15:38:20 +0100

34 lines

New Thread

fslmaths bptf - temporal bandpass filtering

Re: fslmaths bptf - temporal bandpass filtering

Laurence Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 May 2011 18:48:13 +0100

31 lines

Re: fslmaths bptf - temporal bandpass filtering

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 May 2011 18:36:16 -0400

50 lines

New Thread

fslview and medcon .nii files

Re: fslview and medcon .nii files

Jason Steffener <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 May 2011 15:18:00 +0100

20 lines

Re: fslview and medcon .nii files

David Flitney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 May 2011 15:36:44 +0100

91 lines

Re: fslview and medcon .nii files

David Gutman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 May 2011 10:42:57 -0400

46 lines

Re: fslview and medcon .nii files

Jason Steffener <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 May 2011 10:51:22 -0400

63 lines

Re: fslview and medcon .nii files

Jason Steffener <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 May 2011 16:22:17 -0400

81 lines

New Thread

fslview problem

fslview problem

liang wang <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 May 2011 19:47:10 -0400

59 lines

Re: fslview problem

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 May 2011 18:56:46 -0500

369 lines

Re: fslview problem

liang wang <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 May 2011 20:04:57 -0400

291 lines

New Thread

Functional Neuroimaging Research Assistantship at UCLA

Functional Neuroimaging Research Assistantship at UCLA

Katie Karlsgodt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 May 2011 11:26:30 -0700

60 lines

New Thread

FW: Re: [FSL] questions about FIRST segmentation faults

FW: Re: [FSL] questions about FIRST segmentation faults

Chien-Han Lai <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 May 2011 09:58:20 +0800

231 lines

Re: FW: Re: [FSL] questions about FIRST segmentation faults

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 May 2011 21:47:31 +0100

124 lines

Re: FW: Re: [FSL] questions about FIRST segmentation faults

Chien-Han Lai <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 May 2011 09:27:01 +0800

386 lines

Re: FW: Re: [FSL] questions about FIRST segmentation faults

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 May 2011 09:43:34 +0100

175 lines

Re: FW: Re: [FSL] questions about FIRST segmentation faults

Chien-Han Lai <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 May 2011 10:12:59 +0800

332 lines

Re: FW: Re: [FSL] questions about FIRST segmentation faults

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 May 2011 10:02:24 +0100

211 lines

Re: FW: Re: [FSL] questions about FIRST segmentation faults

Chien-Han Lai <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 May 2011 10:17:14 +0800

398 lines

Re: FW: Re: [FSL] questions about FIRST segmentation faults

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 May 2011 08:39:52 +0100

259 lines

Re: FW: Re: [FSL] questions about FIRST segmentation faults

Chien-Han Lai <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 May 2011 09:46:22 +0800

480 lines

Re: FW: Re: [FSL] questions about FIRST segmentation faults

Chien-Han Lai <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2011 09:34:41 +0800

644 lines

Re: FW: Re: [FSL] questions about FIRST segmentation faults

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2011 08:51:41 +0100

328 lines

Re: FW: Re: [FSL] questions about FIRST segmentation faults

Chien-Han Lai <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 May 2011 12:27:13 +0800

624 lines

Re: FW: Re: [FSL] questions about FIRST segmentation faults

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 May 2011 10:40:21 +0100

376 lines

Re: FW: Re: [FSL] questions about FIRST segmentation faults

Chien-Han Lai <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 May 2011 09:38:41 +0800

634 lines

Re: FW: Re: [FSL] questions about FIRST segmentation faults

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 May 2011 08:52:16 +0100

394 lines

Re: FW: Re: [FSL] questions about FIRST segmentation faults

Chien-Han Lai <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 May 2011 08:08:51 +0800

718 lines

New Thread

generating reg_standard directory and log- directories

generating reg_standard directory and log- directories

Cinly Ooi <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2011 18:25:38 +0100

105 lines

Re: generating reg_standard directory and log- directories

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2011 13:38:29 -0400

171 lines

Re: generating reg_standard directory and log- directories

Cinly Ooi <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2011 18:29:07 +0100

157 lines

Re: generating reg_standard directory and log- directories

Michael Harms <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2011 12:46:50 -0500

75 lines

Re: generating reg_standard directory and log- directories

Cinly Ooi <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2011 18:54:07 +0100

212 lines

Re: generating reg_standard directory and log- directories

Cinly Ooi <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2011 18:55:06 +0100

200 lines

New Thread

Grid computing

Grid computing

Arman Eshaghi <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2011 22:16:30 +0430

22 lines

Re: Grid computing

Chuck Theobald <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2011 10:24:13 -0700

40 lines

Re: Grid computing

Satrajit Ghosh <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2011 14:01:19 -0400

150 lines

Re: Grid computing

Andrew Janke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 May 2011 22:53:03 +1000

42 lines

Re: Grid computing

Michael Hanke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 May 2011 15:12:49 -0400

55 lines

Re: Grid computing

James E. Dobson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 May 2011 15:35:03 -0400

25 lines

New Thread

Help with fslstats error

Re: Help with fslstats error

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 May 2011 18:09:58 +0100

616 lines

New Thread

help! repeated measures with covariate in FEAT

help! repeated measures with covariate in FEAT

Alexander Olsen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2011 01:12:09 +0100

26 lines

Re: help! repeated measures with covariate in FEAT

Michael Harms <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2011 11:07:01 -0500

37 lines

Re: help! repeated measures with covariate in FEAT

Alexander Olsen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2011 19:44:07 +0200

48 lines

Re: help! repeated measures with covariate in FEAT

MCLAREN, Donald <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2011 13:47:46 -0400

165 lines

Re: help! repeated measures with covariate in FEAT

Alexander Olsen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2011 19:56:59 +0200

94 lines

Re: help! repeated measures with covariate in FEAT

Michael Harms <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2011 13:00:34 -0500

62 lines

Re: help! repeated measures with covariate in FEAT

Michael Harms <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2011 13:11:30 -0500

103 lines

Re: help! repeated measures with covariate in FEAT

Alexander Olsen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2011 20:14:16 +0200

75 lines

Re: help! repeated measures with covariate in FEAT

Michael Harms <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2011 13:28:25 -0500

90 lines

Re: help! repeated measures with covariate in FEAT

Alexander Olsen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2011 21:20:38 +0200

103 lines

Re: help! repeated measures with covariate in FEAT

MCLAREN, Donald <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2011 15:46:01 -0400

327 lines

Re: help! repeated measures with covariate in FEAT

Hyo Jong Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2011 05:04:25 +0900

235 lines

Re: help! repeated measures with covariate in FEAT

Michael Harms <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2011 15:03:02 -0500

200 lines

Re: help! repeated measures with covariate in FEAT

Michael Harms <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2011 15:10:20 -0500

177 lines

New Thread

help!TBSS voxelwise statistics (Glm_gui) error

help!TBSS voxelwise statistics (Glm_gui) error

chihiro Hosoda <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2011 08:11:06 +0100

68 lines

Re: help!TBSS voxelwise statistics (Glm_gui) error

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2011 10:30:00 +0100

80 lines

Re: help!TBSS voxelwise statistics (Glm_gui) error

chihiro Hosoda <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2011 09:46:15 +0100

27 lines

Re: help!TBSS voxelwise statistics (Glm_gui) error

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2011 13:55:49 +0100

76 lines

New Thread

higher-level issue

higher-level issue

David Soto <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 May 2011 09:05:22 +0100

126 lines

Re: higher-level issue

David Soto <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 May 2011 12:46:11 +0100

12 lines

New Thread

Highly negatively correlated waytotal and average FA

Highly negatively correlated waytotal and average FA

hd x <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 May 2011 10:53:13 +0200

122 lines

Re: Highly negatively correlated waytotal and average FA

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 May 2011 11:33:54 -0500

458 lines

Re: Highly negatively correlated waytotal and average FA

András Jakab MD <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 May 2011 19:04:49 +0200

362 lines

Re: Highly negatively correlated waytotal and average FA

hd x <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2011 08:44:48 +0200

392 lines

Re: Highly negatively correlated waytotal and average FA

hd x <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2011 08:48:42 +0200

351 lines

Re: Highly negatively correlated waytotal and average FA

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2011 09:30:32 -0500

661 lines

Re: Highly negatively correlated waytotal and average FA

hd x <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2011 10:50:23 +0200

543 lines

Re: Highly negatively correlated waytotal and average FA

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2011 13:05:57 -0500

873 lines

Re: Highly negatively correlated waytotal and average FA

hd x <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 May 2011 10:43:51 +0200

690 lines

Re: Highly negatively correlated waytotal and average FA

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 May 2011 15:47:37 -0500

1234 lines

Re: Highly negatively correlated waytotal and average FA

hd x <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2011 18:30:16 +0200

1000 lines

New Thread

How to calculate b-matrix

How to calculate b-matrix

Suchada Tantisatirapong <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 May 2011 09:29:44 +0100

154 lines

Re: How to calculate b-matrix

Stamatios Sotiropoulos <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 May 2011 10:40:58 +0100

186 lines

Re: How to calculate b-matrix

Suchada Tantisatirapong <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 May 2011 16:40:33 +0100

272 lines

Re: How to calculate b-matrix

Stamatios Sotiropoulos <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 May 2011 11:50:27 +0100

22 lines

New Thread

How to generate GE MRI with POSSUM

Re: How to generate GE MRI with POSSUM

Pedro Mendes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 May 2011 10:49:30 +0100

26 lines

Re: How to generate GE MRI with POSSUM

Pedro Mendes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 May 2011 16:44:56 +0100

39 lines

Re: How to generate GE MRI with POSSUM

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 May 2011 22:00:04 +0100

78 lines

Re: How to generate GE MRI with POSSUM

Pedro Mendes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 May 2011 09:47:55 +0100

39 lines

Re: How to generate GE MRI with POSSUM

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 May 2011 10:49:37 +0100

81 lines

New Thread

ICA axial view

ICA axial view

Carolina Valencia <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 May 2011 16:15:59 +0100

21 lines

Re: ICA axial view

John Herrington <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 May 2011 11:54:48 -0400

29 lines

Re: ICA axial view

Carolina Valencia <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 May 2011 11:21:20 -0500

92 lines

Re: ICA axial view

John Herrington <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 May 2011 12:29:17 -0400

153 lines

Re: ICA axial view

Carolina Valencia <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 May 2011 12:08:44 -0500

164 lines

New Thread

ICA in FDG-PET data

ICA in FDG-PET data

Mohamed Ali Bahri <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 May 2011 09:08:29 +0200

18 lines

New Thread

If waytotal is the one...

If waytotal is the one...

hd x <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2011 11:53:51 +0200

60 lines

Re: If waytotal is the one...

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2011 09:33:39 -0500

360 lines

Re: If waytotal is the one...

hd x <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2011 16:46:00 +0200

320 lines

Re: If waytotal is the one...

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2011 10:13:34 -0500

576 lines

Re: If waytotal is the one...

hd x <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2011 10:40:44 +0200

446 lines

New Thread

import Slicer linear registration transform.tfm file in FSL...

import Slicer linear registration transform.tfm file in FSL...

Gonzalo Rojas Costa <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 May 2011 11:14:50 -0400

28 lines

New Thread

intensity normalisation in melodic / overfitting

intensity normalisation in melodic / overfitting

Philipp G. Saemann <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 May 2011 10:31:05 +0100

35 lines

Re: intensity normalisation in melodic / overfitting

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 May 2011 08:26:42 -0400

147 lines

New Thread

Interaction between 2 continuous variables

Interaction between 2 continuous variables

Jennifer Bramen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 May 2011 21:23:14 +0100

19 lines

New Thread

Job announcement: Postdoctoral or PhD position in Tuebingen

Job announcement: Postdoctoral or PhD position in Tuebingen

B. de Haan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 May 2011 09:04:44 +0100

35 lines

New Thread

Job Announcement: Postdoctoral Position at Children’s National Medical Center

Job Announcement: Postdoctoral Position at Children’s National Medical Center

Cedric Clouchoux <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 May 2011 16:50:42 +0100

54 lines

New Thread

Job Opening: Research Assistant/Lab Manager Position at Harvard University

Job Opening: Research Assistant/Lab Manager Position at Harvard University

Harvard SNPlab <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 May 2011 22:57:26 -0500

108 lines

New Thread

Job Openings at CUBRIC, Cardiff, UK

Job Openings at CUBRIC, Cardiff, UK

Derek Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 May 2011 09:13:20 +0100

66 lines

New Thread

job opportunity

job opportunity

Paige Scalf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 May 2011 13:01:21 -0500

48 lines

New Thread

large design matrices in FEAT

large design matrices in FEAT

Alexander Olsen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2011 03:43:26 +0100

20 lines

New Thread

longitudinal VBM

longitudinal VBM

Dídac Vidal <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2011 10:53:57 +0100

25 lines

longitudinal VBM

Dídac Vidal <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 May 2011 09:08:16 +0100

31 lines

New Thread

mask for randomise after tbss sym

Re: mask for randomise after tbss sym

Nataliah <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 May 2011 10:54:36 +0100

35 lines

Re: mask for randomise after tbss sym

Nataliah <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 May 2011 10:04:20 +0100

30 lines

Re: mask for randomise after tbss sym

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 May 2011 12:36:54 +0200

112 lines

New Thread

Masks

Masks

Walden, Eric <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 May 2011 17:57:12 -0500

16 lines

Re: Masks

David V. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 May 2011 19:54:07 -0400

42 lines

New Thread

Measure the anterior cingulate using FIRST?

Measure the anterior cingulate using FIRST?

Kevin Denny <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 May 2011 17:00:37 +0100

41 lines

Re: Measure the anterior cingulate using FIRST?

Paul Robinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 May 2011 12:20:15 -0400

101 lines

Re: Measure the anterior cingulate using FIRST?

Kevin Denny <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 May 2011 17:24:19 +0100

18 lines

Re: Measure the anterior cingulate using FIRST?

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 May 2011 17:53:54 +0100

37 lines

New Thread

Melodic problems

Melodic problems

Torsten Ruest <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 May 2011 17:52:22 +0100

69 lines

Re: Melodic problems

Torsten Ruest <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 May 2011 11:06:04 +0100

56 lines

New Thread

Melodic registration problem

Melodic registration problem

Carolina Valencia <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 May 2011 15:41:13 +0100

31 lines

New Thread

Melodic registration question

Re: Melodic registration question

Ted Satterthwaite <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 May 2011 18:00:55 +0100

30 lines

Re: Melodic registration question

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 May 2011 13:36:33 -0400

44 lines

New Thread

Melodic: PCA eigenvalues stored?

Re: Melodic: PCA eigenvalues stored?

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 May 2011 10:10:23 +0200

31 lines

Re: Melodic: PCA eigenvalues stored?

Sudhin A. Shah <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 May 2011 21:40:25 +0000

85 lines

Re: Melodic: PCA eigenvalues stored?

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 May 2011 08:12:01 +0200

97 lines

Re: Melodic: PCA eigenvalues stored?

Sudhin A. Shah <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 May 2011 15:33:55 +0000

171 lines

Re: Melodic: PCA eigenvalues stored?

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 May 2011 00:05:19 +0200

98 lines

Re: Melodic: PCA eigenvalues stored?

Sudhin A. Shah <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 May 2011 17:01:05 +0000

233 lines

Re: Melodic: PCA eigenvalues stored?

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 May 2011 04:55:28 +0200

150 lines

Re: Melodic: PCA eigenvalues stored?

Sudhin A. Shah <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 May 2011 15:13:27 +0000

376 lines

Re: Melodic: PCA eigenvalues stored?

Sudhin A. Shah <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2011 17:13:47 -0400

262 lines

New Thread

melodic_oIC and melodic_IC

melodic_oIC and melodic_IC

Wastling, Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 May 2011 16:28:11 +0100

81 lines

Re: melodic_oIC and melodic_IC

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 May 2011 10:09:48 +0200

31 lines

New Thread

Minimum directions required for FDT-PROBTRACKX

Minimum directions required for FDT-PROBTRACKX

Arash Nazeri <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 May 2011 16:22:00 -0400

48 lines

Re: Minimum directions required for FDT-PROBTRACKX

Stamatios Sotiropoulos <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 May 2011 08:09:15 +0100

129 lines

Re: Minimum directions required for FDT-PROBTRACKX

Arash Nazeri <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 May 2011 12:17:31 -0400

145 lines

Re: Minimum directions required for FDT-PROBTRACKX

Arman Eshaghi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 May 2011 22:34:57 +0430

189 lines

New Thread

NEURO-BUREAU: ADHD-200 Processed Data New Additions

NEURO-BUREAU: ADHD-200 Processed Data New Additions

Cameron Craddock <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 May 2011 12:46:16 -0400

542 lines

New Thread

Neuroinformatics 2011 - Early bird deadline June 1

Neuroinformatics 2011 - Early bird deadline June 1

David Kennedy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 May 2011 14:46:46 -0400

25 lines

New Thread

Neuroscience software survey: What is popular, what has problems? Immediate results

Neuroscience software survey: What is popular, what has problems? Immediate results

Michael Hanke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 May 2011 09:05:16 -0400

33 lines

New Thread

newborn atlas

newborn atlas

Angela Favaro <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 May 2011 12:59:48 +0100

17 lines

Re: newborn atlas

Rajendra Morey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 May 2011 10:13:33 -0400

28 lines

Re: newborn atlas

Lisa F. Akiyama <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 May 2011 07:22:00 -0700

85 lines

Re: newborn atlas

Angela Favaro <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2011 12:42:46 +0200

55 lines

Re: newborn atlas

John E. Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2011 18:20:10 -0700

59 lines

New Thread

nonlinear solver for dtifit

nonlinear solver for dtifit

Micah Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 May 2011 19:16:43 +0100

14 lines

Re: nonlinear solver for dtifit

Jesper Andersson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 May 2011 11:33:18 +0100

46 lines

New Thread

older version fsl (4.0.2)

Re: older version fsl (4.0.2)

Sara Moore <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 May 2011 20:29:03 +0100

34 lines

Re: older version fsl (4.0.2)

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 May 2011 10:27:17 +0100

45 lines

Re: older version fsl (4.0.2)

Sara Moore <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 May 2011 17:38:17 +0100

12 lines

Re: older version fsl (4.0.2)

Sara Moore <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 May 2011 21:36:16 +0100

60 lines

Re: older version fsl (4.0.2)

Sara Moore <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 May 2011 15:15:20 +0100

66 lines

Re: older version fsl (4.0.2)

Cornelius Werner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 May 2011 16:42:37 +0200

101 lines

Re: older version fsl (4.0.2)

Sara Moore <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 May 2011 16:56:31 +0100

18 lines

Re: older version fsl (4.0.2)

Cornelius Werner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 May 2011 18:12:32 +0200

41 lines

Re: older version fsl (4.0.2)

Sara Moore <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 May 2011 17:38:18 +0100

18 lines

Re: older version fsl (4.0.2)

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 May 2011 20:40:59 +0200

35 lines

Re: older version fsl (4.0.2)

Sara Moore <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 May 2011 20:20:01 +0100

23 lines

Re: older version fsl (4.0.2)

Sara Moore <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 May 2011 21:43:10 +0100

20 lines

Re: older version fsl (4.0.2)

Sara Moore <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 May 2011 20:52:16 +0100

17 lines

New Thread

One factor three levels

One factor three levels

Andres Roman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 May 2011 15:51:14 +0100

48 lines

Re: One factor three levels

Eugene Duff <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 May 2011 17:02:25 +0100

177 lines

Re: One factor three levels

Andres Roman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 May 2011 16:30:43 +0100

218 lines

Re: One factor three levels

Eugene Duff <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 May 2011 20:05:03 +0100

262 lines

Re: One factor three levels

Andres Roman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 May 2011 22:59:26 +0100

367 lines

Re: One factor three levels

Eugene Duff <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 May 2011 09:44:14 +0100

406 lines

Re: One factor three levels

Andres Roman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 May 2011 11:17:51 +0100

499 lines

Re: One factor three levels

Eugene Duff <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 May 2011 11:31:17 +0100

554 lines

New Thread

One factor three levels vs 3 pairwise comparisons

One factor three levels vs 3 pairwise comparisons

Andres Roman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 May 2011 11:10:23 +0100

171 lines

Re: One factor three levels vs 3 pairwise comparisons

Andres Roman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 May 2011 14:33:38 +0100

92 lines

New Thread

PET design matrix - interaction

PET design matrix - interaction

Cornelius Werner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 May 2011 10:59:10 +0200

102 lines

Re: PET design matrix - interaction

Cornelius Werner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 May 2011 12:33:17 +0200

73 lines

New Thread

Post-Stats Table

Post-Stats Table

Dave Chester <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 May 2011 17:29:59 +0100

19 lines

Re: Post-Stats Table

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 May 2011 19:16:33 +0100

95 lines

New Thread

Postdoc position available in clinical neuroscience and neuroimaging

Postdoc position available in clinical neuroscience and neuroimaging

Tetiana Dadakova <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 May 2011 10:08:44 +0200

340 lines

New Thread

PostDoc- and PhD-positions at the Central Institute of Mental Health in Germany (ZI Mannheim)

PostDoc- and PhD-positions at the Central Institute of Mental Health in Germany (ZI Mannheim)

Zangl, Maria <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2011 14:22:18 +0200

309 lines

New Thread

Postdoctoral fellowship in pain neuroimaging at University of Maryland Baltimore

Postdoctoral fellowship in pain neuroimaging at University of Maryland Baltimore

David Seminowicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 May 2011 09:07:15 -0400

109 lines

New Thread

Postdoctoral fellowships at Oxford University on brain basis of visual attention and associative processing and disruption and retraining of these mechanisms in anxiety

Postdoctoral fellowships at Oxford University on brain basis of visual attention and associative processing and disruption and retraining of these mechanisms in anxiety

sonia bishop <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 May 2011 06:40:56 -0700

85 lines

New Thread

Postdoctoral Scholar positions at USC

Postdoctoral Scholar positions at USC

Gui Xue <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 May 2011 09:31:35 -0700

161 lines

New Thread

poststats inquiry pls

poststats inquiry pls

David Soto <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2011 13:06:40 +0100

41 lines

Re: poststats inquiry pls

Thomas Nichols <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 May 2011 10:06:50 +0100

190 lines

Re: poststats inquiry pls

David Soto <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 May 2011 01:17:57 +0100

17 lines

New Thread

PPI combine runs

PPI combine runs

Hannah Bruehl <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 May 2011 10:51:23 +0100

30 lines

Re: PPI combine runs

Benjamin, Christopher <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 May 2011 11:26:26 -0400

46 lines

New Thread

Prestats error

Re: Prestats error

David Soto <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2011 19:17:02 +0100

488 lines

New Thread

Principal Components analysis

Principal Components analysis

Sudhin A. Shah <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 May 2011 18:13:22 +0000

437 lines

New Thread

problem wit bedpostx

problem wit bedpostx

Theodor R?ber <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 May 2011 22:28:41 +0200

259 lines

Re: problem wit bedpostx

Stamatios Sotiropoulos <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 May 2011 21:46:59 +0100

274 lines

Re: problem wit bedpostx

Theodor R?ber <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 May 2011 02:15:36 +0200

290 lines

Re: problem wit bedpostx

Stamatios Sotiropoulos <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 May 2011 08:11:51 +0100

306 lines

Re: problem wit bedpostx

Theodor R?ber <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2011 14:18:35 +0200

339 lines

Re: problem wit bedpostx

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2011 07:48:12 -0500

354 lines

Re: problem wit bedpostx

Stamatios Sotiropoulos <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 May 2011 22:41:00 +0100

368 lines

New Thread

problem with fslvbm_2_template gray matter segmentation

problem with fslvbm_2_template gray matter segmentation

Antonius Wiehler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 May 2011 16:57:20 +0200

23 lines

New Thread

problem with fslview

problem with fslview

philipp thomann <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2011 14:46:44 +0200

22 lines

New Thread

problem with SGE queue manager?

problem with SGE queue manager?

Alle Meije Wink <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 May 2011 11:32:56 +0200

73 lines

Re: problem with SGE queue manager?

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 May 2011 12:29:18 +0200

58 lines

Re: problem with SGE queue manager?

Alle Meije Wink <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 May 2011 13:06:43 +0100

31 lines

New Thread

probtrack : waypoint vs termination

probtrack : waypoint vs termination

Romain Quentin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 May 2011 11:38:00 +0100

18 lines

Re: probtrack : waypoint vs termination

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 May 2011 13:30:14 +0100

41 lines

Re: probtrack : waypoint vs termination

romain quentin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 May 2011 15:20:07 +0200

131 lines

Re: probtrack : waypoint vs termination

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 May 2011 17:21:52 +0100

262 lines

Re: probtrack : waypoint vs termination

romain quentin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 May 2011 11:00:06 +0200

303 lines

Re: probtrack : waypoint vs termination

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 May 2011 14:11:09 +0100

431 lines

Re: probtrack : waypoint vs termination

romain quentin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 May 2011 15:43:17 +0200

478 lines

Re: probtrack : waypoint vs termination

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 May 2011 15:30:02 +0100

628 lines

New Thread

Probtrackx segmentation fault

Probtrackx segmentation fault

Paula Wu <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 May 2011 17:36:42 -0700

352 lines

Re: Probtrackx segmentation fault

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 May 2011 08:52:36 +0100

530 lines

New Thread

qboot

qboot

Wayne Su <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 May 2011 13:46:17 -0700

14 lines

New Thread

question

question

Leslie Engineering <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 May 2011 10:01:36 -0400

35 lines

Re: question

Stamatios Sotiropoulos <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 May 2011 15:32:45 +0100

32 lines

Re: question

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 May 2011 09:45:01 -0500

50 lines

Re: question

Stamatios Sotiropoulos <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 May 2011 16:08:16 +0100

58 lines

Re: question

Leslie Engineering <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 May 2011 12:21:33 -0400

152 lines

Re: question

Leslie Engineering <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 May 2011 12:34:59 -0400

175 lines

Re: question

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 May 2011 11:53:55 -0500

405 lines

Re: question

Leslie Engineering <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 May 2011 13:05:01 -0400

364 lines

Re: question

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 May 2011 18:30:19 +0100

153 lines

New Thread

Question About Converting Probability maps in Z-stat maps

Question About Converting Probability maps in Z-stat maps

suril gohel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 May 2011 13:23:52 -0400

44 lines

Re: Question About Converting Probability maps in Z-stat maps

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 May 2011 18:26:17 +0100

102 lines

New Thread

Question about segmentation with freesurfer

Question about segmentation with freesurfer

Yibao Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2011 19:41:44 -0400

420 lines

Re: Question about segmentation with freesurfer

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 May 2011 08:44:08 +0100

30 lines

Re: Question about segmentation with freesurfer

Bruce Fischl <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 May 2011 08:24:57 -0400

59 lines

New Thread

questions about FIRST segmentation faults

questions about FIRST segmentation faults

Chien-Han Lai <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 May 2011 18:32:12 +0800

71 lines

Re: questions about FIRST segmentation faults

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 May 2011 11:55:07 +0100

55 lines

Re: questions about FIRST segmentation faults

Chien-Han Lai <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 May 2011 09:23:16 +0800

230 lines

New Thread

Randmise and multiple comparsions in FLAME

Randmise and multiple comparsions in FLAME

Liu Ci-Rong <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 May 2011 09:30:55 +0100

28 lines

Re: Randmise and multiple comparsions in FLAME

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 May 2011 10:24:32 +0100

117 lines

New Thread

randomise + TFCE clarification

randomise + TFCE clarification

Miguel Burgaleta <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2011 12:12:29 +0200

58 lines

Re: randomise + TFCE clarification

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2011 11:40:49 +0100

45 lines

Re: randomise + TFCE clarification

Miguel Burgaleta <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2011 17:49:29 +0200

103 lines

New Thread

Randomise Interaction

Randomise Interaction

R. Duke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 May 2011 21:31:46 +0100

47 lines

Re: Randomise Interaction

Michael Harms <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 May 2011 16:16:31 -0500

44 lines

Re: Randomise Interaction

R Duke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 May 2011 04:01:09 -0700

100 lines

Re: Randomise Interaction

Michael Harms <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 May 2011 08:09:59 -0500

94 lines

New Thread

Randomise- multiple mask options?

Randomise- multiple mask options?

Ramtilak Gattu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 May 2011 19:14:14 +0100

33 lines

Re: Randomise- multiple mask options?

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 May 2011 07:37:39 +0100

131 lines

New Thread

randomise: p value in the corrected volume, positive or negative?

randomise: p value in the corrected volume, positive or negative?

Xiangzhen Kong <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 May 2011 13:07:49 +0800

306 lines

Re: randomise: p value in the corrected volume, positive or negative?

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 May 2011 09:06:20 +0100

129 lines

New Thread

Re : Total Intracranial Volume & files in struc for FSLVBM

Re : Total Intracranial Volume & files in struc for FSLVBM

Aditya Kumar Kasinadhuni <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2011 16:50:04 +0100

31 lines

Re: Re : Total Intracranial Volume & files in struc for FSLVBM

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2011 18:18:17 +0100

66 lines

New Thread

Re : [FSL] BET for vbm

Re : [FSL] BET for vbm

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 May 2011 12:00:00 +0100

26 lines

New Thread

Re : [FSL] crossing fibers

Re: Re : [FSL] crossing fibers

Bryan Benson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 May 2011 13:56:37 -0400

239 lines

Re: Re : [FSL] crossing fibers

Stamatios Sotiropoulos <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 May 2011 10:38:03 +0100

262 lines

Re: Re : [FSL] crossing fibers

Bryan Benson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2011 17:51:17 -0400

315 lines

New Thread

Re : [FSL] Definition of dti_MO (Mode of Anisotropy) in dtifit

Re: Re : [FSL] Definition of dti_MO (Mode of Anisotropy) in dtifit

Riccardo Navarra <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 May 2011 11:35:10 +0100

14 lines

New Thread

Re : [FSL] longitudinal VBM

Re : [FSL] longitudinal VBM

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2011 16:38:26 +0100

55 lines

Re: Re : [FSL] longitudinal VBM

Dídac Vidal <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 May 2011 09:07:15 +0100

29 lines

Re: Re : [FSL] longitudinal VBM

Dídac Vidal <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 May 2011 13:36:01 +0100

35 lines

Re: Re : [FSL] longitudinal VBM

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 May 2011 13:21:37 +0100

36 lines

New Thread

Re : [FSL] problem with fslvbm_2_template gray matter segmentation

Re : [FSL] problem with fslvbm_2_template gray matter segmentation

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 May 2011 11:56:33 +0100

26 lines

New Thread

Reg Multiple comparison correction.......P value significance level......

Reg Multiple comparison correction.......P value significance level......

Bhavani shankara <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 May 2011 08:03:38 +0530

63 lines

Re: Reg Multiple comparison correction.......P value significance level......

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 May 2011 09:13:01 +0100

73 lines

Re: Reg Multiple comparison correction.......P value significance level......

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 May 2011 15:52:17 +0100

149 lines

Re: Reg Multiple comparison correction.......P value significance level......

Bhavani shankara <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 May 2011 07:23:13 +0530

195 lines

New Thread

Registration

Registration

Aditya Kumar Kasinadhuni <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 May 2011 16:08:07 +0100

22 lines

Re: Registration

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 May 2011 16:42:10 +0100

56 lines

New Thread

Registration of Oxford thalamic connectivity atlas into subject space

Registration of Oxford thalamic connectivity atlas into subject space

Michael B <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 May 2011 18:28:40 +0100

42 lines

Re: Registration of Oxford thalamic connectivity atlas into subject space

Jesper Andersson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 May 2011 22:50:13 +0100

47 lines

Re: Registration of Oxford thalamic connectivity atlas into subject space

David Gutman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 May 2011 11:13:57 -0400

74 lines

Re: Registration of Oxford thalamic connectivity atlas into subject space

Michael Bonares <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 May 2011 13:44:09 -0400

164 lines

New Thread

removing components after group ICA

removing components after group ICA

Jiansong Xu <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 May 2011 10:33:52 -0400

167 lines

Re: removing components after group ICA

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 May 2011 21:00:40 +0200

94 lines

Re: removing components after group ICA

Jiansong Xu <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 May 2011 17:09:22 -0400

135 lines

Re: removing components after group ICA

Jiansong Xu <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 May 2011 10:08:04 -0400

318 lines

Re: removing components after group ICA

Jiansong Xu <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 May 2011 09:27:43 -0400

119 lines

New Thread

removing components after group MELODIC -- third attempts

removing components after group MELODIC -- third attempts

Jiansong Xu <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 May 2011 15:03:50 -0400

162 lines

Re: removing components after group MELODIC -- third attempts

David V. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 May 2011 15:18:56 -0400

192 lines

New Thread

resting state analysis design setup

resting state analysis design setup

Amy <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 May 2011 21:48:45 +0100

22 lines

New Thread

Resting state and drug infusion

Resting state and drug infusion

Claudia Huerta <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 May 2011 20:58:27 +0100

19 lines

Re: Resting state and drug infusion

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 May 2011 15:13:26 -0500

39 lines

Re: Resting state and drug infusion

David Gutman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 May 2011 16:26:44 -0400

63 lines

Re: Resting state and drug infusion

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 May 2011 04:23:14 +0100

105 lines

New Thread

Rotation of b-vectors

Rotation of b-vectors

John Ashburner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 May 2011 11:38:43 +0100

42 lines

Re: Rotation of b-vectors

Xiaowei Zou <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 May 2011 10:14:20 -0400

121 lines

Re: Rotation of b-vectors

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 May 2011 15:57:49 +0100

72 lines

New Thread

Running a very large anova

Re: Running a very large anova

Alexander Olsen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2011 23:09:39 +0100

13 lines

New Thread

segmentation error

segmentation error

SERMIIIN Dz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 May 2011 16:57:47 +0200

64 lines

Re: segmentation error

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 May 2011 18:03:08 +0100

43 lines

Re: segmentation error

SERMIIIN Dz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 May 2011 15:06:25 +0200

121 lines

Re: segmentation error

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 May 2011 14:19:27 +0100

84 lines

Re: segmentation error

SERMIIIN Dz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 May 2011 17:06:06 +0200

185 lines

Re: segmentation error

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 May 2011 08:48:38 +0100

129 lines

New Thread

Setting up an analysis with multiple sessions/runs

Setting up an analysis with multiple sessions/runs

Erie Boorman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2011 01:21:46 +0100

63 lines

Re: Setting up an analysis with multiple sessions/runs

Benjamin, Christopher <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2011 21:49:19 -0400

101 lines

Re: Setting up an analysis with multiple sessions/runs

Erie Boorman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 May 2011 21:56:37 +0100

32 lines

Re: Setting up an analysis with multiple sessions/runs

Eugene Duff <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 May 2011 23:11:25 +0100

105 lines

Re: Setting up an analysis with multiple sessions/runs

Erie Boorman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 May 2011 12:50:03 -0700

228 lines

Re: Setting up an analysis with multiple sessions/runs

Michael Harms <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 May 2011 15:35:04 -0500

100 lines

Re: Setting up an analysis with multiple sessions/runs

Erie Boorman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 May 2011 13:48:29 -0700

312 lines

Re: Setting up an analysis with multiple sessions/runs

Michael Harms <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 May 2011 16:06:57 -0500

179 lines

Re: Setting up an analysis with multiple sessions/runs

Eugene Duff <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 May 2011 10:57:26 +0100

834 lines

Re: Setting up an analysis with multiple sessions/runs

Erie Boorman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 May 2011 14:01:27 -0700

538 lines

New Thread

SGE timing issue

SGE timing issue

Benjamin Matthew Deen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 May 2011 18:28:36 -0400

26 lines

Re: SGE timing issue

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 May 2011 07:53:16 +0100

114 lines

New Thread

Shift image value

Shift image value

Moran Artzi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 May 2011 17:21:51 +0100

22 lines

Re: Shift image value

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 May 2011 17:28:04 +0100

53 lines

Re: Shift image value

Moran Artzi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 May 2011 19:53:08 +0300

101 lines

New Thread

slicer edge not seen with -l render1

slicer edge not seen with -l render1

bettyann <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 May 2011 06:55:26 +0100

28 lines

Re: slicer edge not seen with -l render1

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 May 2011 13:48:18 +0100

44 lines

Re: slicer edge not seen with -l render1

bettyann <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 May 2011 17:39:12 +0100

29 lines

Re: slicer edge not seen with -l render1

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 May 2011 10:10:32 +0200

46 lines

Re: slicer edge not seen with -l render1

bettyann BA <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 May 2011 02:19:45 +0100

49 lines

Re: slicer edge not seen with -l render1

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 May 2011 20:51:47 +0200

64 lines

Re: slicer edge not seen with -l render1

David Gutman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 May 2011 15:08:42 -0400

87 lines

Re: slicer edge not seen with -l render1

bettyann BA <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 May 2011 00:17:19 +0100

23 lines

Re: slicer edge not seen with -l render1

bettyann <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 May 2011 00:21:47 +0100

23 lines

Re: slicer edge not seen with -l render1

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 May 2011 07:59:28 +0200

46 lines

New Thread

SPM and FEAT FSL

SPM and FEAT FSL

Carolina Valencia <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2011 15:00:45 +0100

47 lines

Re: SPM and FEAT FSL

Demet Gurler <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2011 08:54:57 -0600

112 lines

Re: SPM and FEAT FSL

Cornelius Werner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2011 17:06:28 +0200

66 lines

Re: SPM and FEAT FSL

Carolina Valencia <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2011 10:30:49 -0500

192 lines

Re: SPM and FEAT FSL

Carolina Valencia <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2011 10:25:38 -0500

152 lines

Re: SPM and FEAT FSL

Watson, Christopher <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2011 11:32:27 -0400

106 lines

Re: SPM and FEAT FSL

Carolina Valencia <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2011 10:51:43 -0500

233 lines

Re: SPM and FEAT FSL

Watson, Christopher <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2011 11:56:10 -0400

125 lines

Re: SPM and FEAT FSL

Carolina Valencia <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2011 11:00:58 -0500

285 lines

Re: SPM and FEAT FSL

Carolina Valencia <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2011 12:18:40 -0500

328 lines

Re: SPM and FEAT FSL

Watson, Christopher <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2011 13:19:16 -0400

163 lines

Re: SPM and FEAT FSL

Carolina Valencia <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 May 2011 10:53:54 -0500

230 lines

Re: SPM and FEAT FSL

Cornelius Werner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 May 2011 18:55:41 +0200

142 lines

New Thread

Structural Neuroimaging Research Assistantship at UCLA

Structural Neuroimaging Research Assistantship at UCLA

Katie Karlsgodt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2011 16:58:09 -0700

52 lines

New Thread

Stunning differneces between 2 different tbss analyses

Stunning differneces between 2 different tbss analyses

Raphael Hilgenstock <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 May 2011 16:42:19 +0200

302 lines

Re: Stunning differneces between 2 different tbss analyses

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2011 09:52:10 +0100

64 lines

Re: Stunning differneces between 2 different tbss analyses

Michael Harms <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2011 11:10:01 -0500

71 lines

Re: Stunning differneces between 2 different tbss analyses

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2011 14:33:45 +0100

98 lines

Re: Stunning differneces between 2 different tbss analyses

Bhavani shankara <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2011 19:36:47 +0530

270 lines

Re: Stunning differneces between 2 different tbss analyses

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2011 15:25:33 +0100

283 lines

New Thread

switching from FSL4.1.4_32bits to FSL4.1.4_64bits

switching from FSL4.1.4_32bits to FSL4.1.4_64bits

Daniel Ferreira <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 May 2011 10:54:41 +0100

28 lines

Re: switching from FSL4.1.4_32bits to FSL4.1.4_64bits

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 May 2011 06:54:38 +0100

104 lines

Re: switching from FSL4.1.4_32bits to FSL4.1.4_64bits

Daniel Ferreira Padilla <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 May 2011 13:19:23 +0100

127 lines

Re: switching from FSL4.1.4_32bits to FSL4.1.4_64bits

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 May 2011 11:11:08 +0100

109 lines

New Thread

TBSS

TBSS

Gabor Perlaki <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 May 2011 10:53:22 +0100

28 lines

Re: TBSS

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 May 2011 08:34:19 -0400

137 lines

Re: TBSS

Gabor Perlaki <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 May 2011 13:59:43 +0100

11 lines

New Thread

tbss statistics using mask

tbss statistics using mask

shen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 May 2011 08:11:52 +0100

20 lines

Re: tbss statistics using mask

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 May 2011 15:58:27 +0100

91 lines

New Thread

TBSS with FA maps with different slice sizes

TBSS with FA maps with different slice sizes

Josselin Houenou <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 May 2011 17:05:22 +0100

17 lines

New Thread

TBSS-Effect of data up-sampling on group comparisons

TBSS-Effect of data up-sampling on group comparisons

SUBSCRIBE FSL Anonymous <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 May 2011 05:52:39 +0100

17 lines

New Thread

tbss_3 failed to find header

tbss_3 failed to find header

Jodene Fine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2011 14:15:55 +0100

89 lines

Re: tbss_3 failed to find header

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2011 15:25:14 +0100

108 lines

Re: tbss_3 failed to find header

Jodene Fine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2011 19:01:08 +0100

15 lines

Re: tbss_3 failed to find header

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2011 19:04:00 +0100

29 lines

Re: tbss_3 failed to find header

David Flitney <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 May 2011 08:37:01 +0100

150 lines

New Thread

TBSS_non_FA memory error

TBSS_non_FA memory error

Charlotte Rae <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 May 2011 13:07:12 +0100

47 lines

Re: TBSS_non_FA memory error

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 May 2011 15:24:18 +0100

139 lines

Re: TBSS_non_FA memory error

Charlotte Rae <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 May 2011 17:21:29 +0100

108 lines

New Thread

TBSS_non_FA memory error - SOLVED

Re: TBSS_non_FA memory error - SOLVED

Charlotte Rae <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 May 2011 11:56:56 +0100

19 lines

New Thread

TFCE power analysis

Re: TFCE power analysis

Thomas Nichols <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2011 10:46:43 +0100

212 lines

Re: TFCE power analysis

Thomas Nichols <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2011 10:58:31 +0100

560 lines

Re: TFCE power analysis

Emma Sprooten <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 May 2011 17:56:01 +0100

36 lines

New Thread

TFCE power calculation

TFCE power calculation

Emma Sprooten <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 May 2011 13:23:28 +0100

42 lines

Re: TFCE power calculation

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 May 2011 07:07:49 +0100

175 lines

Re: TFCE power calculation

Jeanette Mumford <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 May 2011 13:49:47 -0500

214 lines

New Thread

Tutorial FDT - Tractography Practical

Tutorial FDT - Tractography Practical

Carolina Valencia <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 May 2011 15:01:21 +0100

23 lines

Re: Tutorial FDT - Tractography Practical

Stamatios Sotiropoulos <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 May 2011 15:07:15 +0100

35 lines

Re: Tutorial FDT - Tractography Practical

Carolina Valencia <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 May 2011 09:11:52 -0500

77 lines

New Thread

using fslmaths to create an roi

Re: using fslmaths to create an roi

Thomas, Adam (NIH/NIMH) [E] <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 May 2011 17:19:08 -0400

55 lines

Re: using fslmaths to create an roi

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 May 2011 22:31:00 +0100

72 lines

Re: using fslmaths to create an roi

Thomas, Adam (NIH/NIMH) [E] <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 May 2011 18:16:34 -0400

87 lines

New Thread

vertex analysis F-values

vertex analysis F-values

SERMIIIN Dz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 May 2011 12:58:01 +0200

99 lines

Re: vertex analysis F-values

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 May 2011 12:29:32 +0100

50 lines

Re: vertex analysis F-values

SERMIIIN Dz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 May 2011 14:07:53 +0200

146 lines

Re: vertex analysis F-values

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 May 2011 13:17:15 +0100

94 lines

Re: vertex analysis F-values

SERMIIIN Dz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 May 2011 14:40:18 +0200

208 lines

Re: vertex analysis F-values

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 May 2011 14:46:25 +0100

152 lines

Re: vertex analysis F-values

SERMIIIN Dz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 May 2011 19:35:22 +0200

367 lines

Re: vertex analysis F-values

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 May 2011 22:44:17 +0100

196 lines

Re: vertex analysis F-values

SERMIIIN Dz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 May 2011 10:09:13 +0200

410 lines

Re: vertex analysis F-values

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 May 2011 14:09:00 +0100

258 lines

Re: vertex analysis F-values

SERMIIIN Dz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 May 2011 15:40:32 +0200

512 lines

New Thread

Viewing spm8 results in spm5

Re: Viewing spm8 results in spm5

SPM help listserv <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 May 2011 23:32:00 +0100

24 lines

Re: Viewing spm8 results in spm5

SPM help listserv <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 May 2011 23:48:23 +0100

89 lines

New Thread

whole-brain and ROI inconsistency

whole-brain and ROI inconsistency

Roberto Ferreira <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 May 2011 11:17:01 +0100

25 lines

Re: whole-brain and ROI inconsistency

Michael Harms <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 May 2011 07:47:41 -0500

39 lines

Re: whole-brain and ROI inconsistency

Daniel Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 May 2011 12:10:39 -0400

97 lines

New Thread

Within-Group Feat Inquiry? Am I being too liberal?

Within-Group Feat Inquiry? Am I being too liberal?

Fadel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 May 2011 16:16:36 +0100

31 lines

Re: Within-Group Feat Inquiry? Am I being too liberal?

Eugene Duff <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 May 2011 17:10:57 +0100

88 lines

Re: Within-Group Feat Inquiry? Am I being too liberal?

Fadel Zeidan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 May 2011 16:28:34 +0000

59 lines

Re: Within-Group Feat Inquiry? Am I being too liberal?

Eugene Duff <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 May 2011 17:51:57 +0100

150 lines

Re: Within-Group Feat Inquiry? Am I being too liberal?

Fadel Zeidan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 May 2011 16:56:40 +0000

100 lines

Re: Within-Group Feat Inquiry? Am I being too liberal?

Eugene Duff <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 May 2011 18:02:19 +0100

237 lines

Re: Within-Group Feat Inquiry? Am I being too liberal?

Fadel Zeidan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 May 2011 17:09:10 +0000

134 lines

Re: Within-Group Feat Inquiry? Am I being too liberal?

Eugene Duff <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 May 2011 09:43:16 +0100

345 lines

Re: Within-Group Feat Inquiry? Am I being too liberal?

Fadel Zeidan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 May 2011 15:57:43 +0000

166 lines

Re: Within-Group Feat Inquiry? Am I being too liberal?

Eugene Duff <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 May 2011 17:30:41 +0100

410 lines

Re: Within-Group Feat Inquiry? Am I being too liberal?

Fadel Zeidan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 May 2011 17:20:36 +0000

199 lines

Re: Within-Group Feat Inquiry? Am I being too liberal?

Fadel Zeidan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 May 2011 18:11:05 +0000

190 lines

New Thread

[Announce] Python in Neuroscience satellite 2011

[Announce] Python in Neuroscience satellite 2011

Gael Varoquaux <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 May 2011 23:54:12 +0200

70 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager