JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


March 2011


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

Cartoon to celebrate the Internet (1 message)
CCTV (22 messages)
CCTV: s.29 or PACE? (3 messages)
Choice of exemptions (1 message)
Civil Parking Enforcement (2 messages)
CLI (9 messages)
Compromise agreements, bonus payments etc. (1 message)
Cookies (4 messages)
council docs in a skip (1 message)
Credit Card Fraud (6 messages)
Data Protection Manager Opportunity (London) - Maternity Cover (1 message)
Data sharing for multi-agency customer journey mapping (1 message)
Debt Collection Agencies (3 messages)
DM 2011 (Rome, Italy) - 1st call extension: until 28 March 2011 (1 message)
Does Police charging an individual (holding inappropriate images) provide sufficient right for an employer to investigate their electronic accounts and desk space? (4 messages)
Don't Get IT (11 messages)
DPA and debt chasing your views on fairness (1 message)
Email Policy Query (6 messages)
Enquiry about speaking at CPD25 course - 31/3/2011 (1 message)
ETICA newsletter second edition March (1 message)
For those interested in Facebook settings (1 message)
Free web seminar this morning (1 message)
free web seminars (1 message)
Freedom Fighting (4 messages)
Friday Question - Expired Processing Agreement (1 message)
FW: Cpd25: Data Protection For Library Staff [Event Ref. No. TG2/DP] (2 messages)
FW: Hawktalk: time to forget about a "right to forget" (1 message)
FW: [data-protection] Cookies (2 messages)
Fw: [data-protection] Does Police charging an individual (holding inappropriate images) provide sufficient right for an employer to investigate their electronic accounts and desk space? (1 message)
Hand-written notes (5 messages)
Hawktalk: RIPA changes in Freedoms Bill: negligible improvement in privacy protection (1 message)
Hawktalk: The confidentiality of personal data in the Census 2011 is not guaranteed (1 message)
Housing Benefit Files (1 message)
ICO evidence identifies data protection concerns over Freedoms Bill (1 message)
Informatics 2011 (Rome, Italy) - 1st call extension: until 28 March 2011 (1 message)
Information Rights Conference (1 message)
is this legal? (4 messages)
ISEB Data Protection Exam Results (1 message)
Local authority surveillance - the new law (1 message)
Lollicam (6 messages)
More breaches (1 message)
Moving On (1 message)
Name & Shame ? (1 message)
New CCTV Code (1 message)
New Group on Linked In (1 message)
NPM: RE: Friday Question - Expired Processing Agreement (1 message)
Passing on company details for cold calling purposes (5 messages)
PC security of foster carers (1 message)
Performance - Who Scored Best? (1 message)
Personal Images on work > computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?) [Long post] (2 messages)
Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?) (7 messages)
Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?) [Long post] (7 messages)
Personal Images on work computers shorter post (2 messages)
Privacy in Public (1 message)
PVP list to ONS (5 messages)
Retention: Adult Alleged Abuser Records (1 message)
revision to PECR changes (1 message)
Right to be forgotten (1 message)
RIPSA Forms Guidance Manual (1 message)
Royston ANPR (1 message)
SAR from a debtor (2 messages)
Schools and the Student Support Centre (3 messages)
Sharing Information from PVP Lists (1 message)
Sorry to inflict this on you: ISEB Data Protection Exam Results (5 messages)
Staff rights v Student rights (3 messages)
Surveillance and CCTV (1 message)
Today's Information Law Daily (1 message)
Trying to locate a decision (3 messages)
Use of Image - Children/Adult (7 messages)
Working Paper on the Regulation of Privacy published (1 message)
[UNCLASSIFIED] Passing on company details for cold calling purposes (1 message)
[UNCLASSIFIED] [data-protection] CCTV: s.29 or PACE? (3 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

Cartoon to celebrate the Internet

Cartoon to celebrate the Internet

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Mar 2011 00:55:05 -0000

221 lines

New Thread

CCTV

CCTV

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:56:42 +0000

34 lines

Re: CCTV

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2011 12:01:47 +0000

77 lines

Re: CCTV

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2011 12:05:21 -0000

163 lines

Re: CCTV

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2011 12:08:44 +0000

169 lines

Re: CCTV

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2011 12:10:47 -0000

123 lines

Re: CCTV

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2011 12:52:12 +0000

214 lines

Re: CCTV

Simon Macauley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:00:41 +0000

254 lines

Re: CCTV

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:03:48 -0000

330 lines

Re: CCTV

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:09:17 -0000

104 lines

Re: CCTV

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:23:14 -0000

204 lines

Re: CCTV

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:24:55 +0000

157 lines

Re: CCTV

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:34:35 -0000

237 lines

Re: CCTV

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:42:20 +0000

236 lines

Re: CCTV

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:49:18 -0000

258 lines

Re: CCTV

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:52:23 -0000

79 lines

Re: CCTV

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Mar 2011 10:24:55 -0000

211 lines

Re: CCTV

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Mar 2011 10:44:47 -0000

302 lines

Re: CCTV

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Mar 2011 10:57:55 +0000

372 lines

Re: CCTV

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Mar 2011 08:10:05 -0000

396 lines

Re: CCTV

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Mar 2011 08:28:34 +0000

488 lines

Re: CCTV

Dinsdale, Peter <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Mar 2011 15:51:27 -0000

393 lines

Re: CCTV

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Mar 2011 16:19:36 +0000

442 lines

New Thread

CCTV: s.29 or PACE?

CCTV: s.29 or PACE?

Matt Morrison <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Mar 2011 12:24:05 +0000

61 lines

CCTV: s.29 or PACE?

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Mar 2011 14:48:51 +0000

114 lines

Re: CCTV: s.29 or PACE?

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Mar 2011 15:01:26 -0000

196 lines

New Thread

Choice of exemptions

Choice of exemptions

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Mar 2011 11:06:00 +0000

50 lines

New Thread

Civil Parking Enforcement

Civil Parking Enforcement

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Mar 2011 22:28:59 +0000

34 lines

Re: Civil Parking Enforcement

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Mar 2011 08:38:14 -0000

93 lines

New Thread

CLI

CLI

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:23:08 +0000

44 lines

Re: CLI

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:42:33 -0000

66 lines

Re: CLI

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:55:46 -0000

160 lines

Re: CLI

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:59:50 -0000

200 lines

Re: CLI

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:59:52 -0000

273 lines

Re: CLI

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:15:20 -0000

77 lines

Re: CLI

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:58:48 -0000

157 lines

Re: CLI

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:04:35 -0000

132 lines

Re: CLI

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:16:16 -0000

163 lines

New Thread

Compromise agreements, bonus payments etc.

Compromise agreements, bonus payments etc.

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Mar 2011 12:44:46 +0100

93 lines

New Thread

Cookies

Cookies

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:43:17 +0000

118 lines

Re: Cookies

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:57:36 -0000

358 lines

Re: Cookies

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Mar 2011 09:08:26 -0500

655 lines

Re: Cookies

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Mar 2011 03:33:31 -0500

522 lines

New Thread

council docs in a skip

council docs in a skip

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Mar 2011 18:29:36 +0000

40 lines

New Thread

Credit Card Fraud

Credit Card Fraud

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Mar 2011 07:41:22 +0000

41 lines

Re: Credit Card Fraud

Watts, Clare (C.) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Mar 2011 07:48:30 -0000

95 lines

Re: Credit Card Fraud

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Mar 2011 07:56:20 +0000

114 lines

Re: Credit Card Fraud

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Mar 2011 09:42:15 +0000

158 lines

Re: Credit Card Fraud

Watts, Clare (C.) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Mar 2011 09:44:21 -0000

190 lines

Re: Credit Card Fraud

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Mar 2011 12:15:36 +0000

58 lines

New Thread

Data Protection Manager Opportunity (London) - Maternity Cover

Data Protection Manager Opportunity (London) - Maternity Cover

Davies, Sarah <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:21:52 -0000

616 lines

New Thread

Data sharing for multi-agency customer journey mapping

Data sharing for multi-agency customer journey mapping

Michelle Peel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Mar 2011 13:03:35 +0000

87 lines

New Thread

Debt Collection Agencies

Debt Collection Agencies

Terry Hutchinson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:31:38 -0000

448 lines

Re: Debt Collection Agencies

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Mar 2011 09:59:35 -0000

175 lines

Re: Debt Collection Agencies

Chris Brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Mar 2011 10:21:11 +0000

244 lines

New Thread

DM 2011 (Rome, Italy) - 1st call extension: until 28 March 2011

DM 2011 (Rome, Italy) - 1st call extension: until 28 March 2011

Natalia Teixeira <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Mar 2011 17:02:29 +0000

135 lines

New Thread

Does Police charging an individual (holding inappropriate images) provide sufficient right for an employer to investigate their electronic accounts and desk space?

Does Police charging an individual (holding inappropriate images) provide sufficient right for an employer to investigate their electronic accounts and desk space?

Graham Wilford <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Mar 2011 08:46:54 +0100

60 lines

Re: Does Police charging an individual (holding inappropriate images) provide sufficient right for an employer to investigate their electronic accounts and desk space?

Chris Bayliss (ITS) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:28:54 +0100

94 lines

Re: Does Police charging an individual (holding inappropriate images) provide sufficient right for an employer to investigate their electronic accounts and desk space?

Andrew Cormack <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:54:13 +0000

102 lines

Re: Does Police charging an individual (holding inappropriate images) provide sufficient right for an employer to investigate their electronic accounts and desk space?

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Mar 2011 14:23:21 +0100

122 lines

New Thread

Don't Get IT

Don't Get IT

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Mar 2011 13:57:25 +0000

106 lines

Re: Don't Get IT

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:01:25 -0000

333 lines

Re: Don't Get IT

Giles, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:10:51 -0000

238 lines

Re: Don't Get IT

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:35:43 -0000

572 lines

Re: Don't Get IT

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:37:26 -0000

278 lines

Re: Don't Get IT

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Mar 2011 12:54:40 -0400

358 lines

Re: Don't Get IT

Andrew Cormack <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:37:24 +0000

405 lines

Re: Don't Get IT

Jethro R Binks <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Mar 2011 08:53:03 +0000

65 lines

Re: Don't Get IT

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Mar 2011 12:40:29 +0000

414 lines

Re: Don't Get IT

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Mar 2011 11:21:25 -0400

445 lines

Re: Don't Get IT

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:22:10 +0000

461 lines

New Thread

DPA and debt chasing your views on fairness

DPA and debt chasing your views on fairness

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:32:09 +0100

329 lines

New Thread

Email Policy Query

Email Policy Query

David Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Mar 2011 12:19:28 +0100

55 lines

Re: Email Policy Query

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Mar 2011 12:26:29 +0100

118 lines

Re: Email Policy Query

David Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Mar 2011 12:32:29 +0100

197 lines

Re: Email Policy Query

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Mar 2011 13:54:14 +0100

49 lines

Re: Email Policy Query

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Mar 2011 14:47:22 +0100

148 lines

Re: Email Policy Query

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:21:11 +0100

81 lines

New Thread

Enquiry about speaking at CPD25 course - 31/3/2011

Enquiry about speaking at CPD25 course - 31/3/2011

Vicky Robertson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Mar 2011 08:25:27 +0000

60 lines

New Thread

ETICA newsletter second edition March

ETICA newsletter second edition March

CCSR Web Master <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Mar 2011 16:24:24 +0100

36 lines

New Thread

For those interested in Facebook settings

For those interested in Facebook settings

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:12:28 -0000

29 lines

New Thread

Free web seminar this morning

Free web seminar this morning

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Mar 2011 08:57:24 +0000

48 lines

New Thread

free web seminars

free web seminars

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Mar 2011 13:55:07 +0000

49 lines

New Thread

Freedom Fighting

Freedom Fighting

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Mar 2011 13:40:44 +0000

44 lines

Freedom Fighting

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Mar 2011 14:36:33 -0000

37 lines

Re: Freedom Fighting

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:13:11 +0000

175 lines

Re: Freedom Fighting

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Mar 2011 16:45:41 -0000

499 lines

New Thread

Friday Question - Expired Processing Agreement

Friday Question - Expired Processing Agreement

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Mar 2011 13:03:40 +0000

45 lines

New Thread

FW: Cpd25: Data Protection For Library Staff [Event Ref. No. TG2/DP]

FW: Cpd25: Data Protection For Library Staff [Event Ref. No. TG2/DP]

Vicky Robertson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Mar 2011 01:27:48 -0700

151 lines

FW: Cpd25: Data Protection For Library Staff [Event Ref. No. TG2/DP]

Vicky Robertson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Mar 2011 06:39:42 -0700

197 lines

New Thread

FW: Hawktalk: time to forget about a "right to forget"

FW: Hawktalk: time to forget about a "right to forget"

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Mar 2011 11:56:23 +0100

287 lines

New Thread

FW: [data-protection] Cookies

FW: [data-protection] Cookies

Chris Spray <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Mar 2011 07:01:35 -0000

737 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Cookies

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Mar 2011 12:13:01 +0000

42 lines

New Thread

Fw: [data-protection] Does Police charging an individual (holding inappropriate images) provide sufficient right for an employer to investigate their electronic accounts and desk space?

Fw: [data-protection] Does Police charging an individual (holding inappropriate images) provide sufficient right for an employer to investigate their electronic accounts and desk space?

Julian Curmi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:49:56 +0200

317 lines

New Thread

Hand-written notes

Hand-written notes

Wendy Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Mar 2011 14:47:19 +0000

38 lines

Re: Hand-written notes

Simon Macauley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Mar 2011 14:50:02 +0000

72 lines

Re: Hand-written notes

David Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:12:54 +0000

131 lines

Re: Hand-written notes

Samantha Hill <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Mar 2011 16:22:15 +0000

327 lines

Re: Hand-written notes

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Mar 2011 16:28:50 -0000

613 lines

New Thread

Hawktalk: RIPA changes in Freedoms Bill: negligible improvement in privacy protection

Hawktalk: RIPA changes in Freedoms Bill: negligible improvement in privacy protection

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Mar 2011 00:17:31 -0000

200 lines

New Thread

Hawktalk: The confidentiality of personal data in the Census 2011 is not guaranteed

Hawktalk: The confidentiality of personal data in the Census 2011 is not guaranteed

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Mar 2011 13:21:11 -0000

227 lines

New Thread

Housing Benefit Files

Housing Benefit Files

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:50:01 -0000

63 lines

New Thread

ICO evidence identifies data protection concerns over Freedoms Bill

ICO evidence identifies data protection concerns over Freedoms Bill

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Mar 2011 01:38:50 -0000

230 lines

New Thread

Informatics 2011 (Rome, Italy) - 1st call extension: until 28 March 2011

Informatics 2011 (Rome, Italy) - 1st call extension: until 28 March 2011

Natalia Teixeira <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Mar 2011 17:03:47 +0000

169 lines

New Thread

Information Rights Conference

Information Rights Conference

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Mar 2011 09:01:08 +0000

45 lines

New Thread

is this legal?

is this legal?

CHARLES OPPENHEIM <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Mar 2011 18:01:31 +0000

137 lines

Re: is this legal?

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Mar 2011 20:46:05 -0000

463 lines

Re: is this legal?

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Mar 2011 12:10:55 +0100

131 lines

Re: is this legal?

CHARLES OPPENHEIM <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Mar 2011 18:54:48 +0100

297 lines

New Thread

ISEB Data Protection Exam Results

ISEB Data Protection Exam Results

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:41:55 +0000

149 lines

New Thread

Local authority surveillance - the new law

Local authority surveillance - the new law

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Mar 2011 08:43:46 +0000

46 lines

New Thread

Lollicam

Lollicam

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Mar 2011 09:55:35 +0000

30 lines

Re: Lollicam

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Mar 2011 09:59:22 -0000

101 lines

Re: Lollicam

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:12:27 -0000

174 lines

Re: Lollicam

Gibson, Martin (ICT) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:17:21 +0000

235 lines

Re: Lollicam

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:25:18 -0000

181 lines

Re: Lollicam

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Mar 2011 12:59:04 -0000

249 lines

New Thread

More breaches

More breaches

datap <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:52:31 +0100

149 lines

New Thread

Moving On

Moving On

Giles, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:18:51 -0000

340 lines

New Thread

Name & Shame ?

Name & Shame ?

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:34:51 +0000

30 lines

New Thread

New CCTV Code

New CCTV Code

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Mar 2011 09:56:34 +0000

102 lines

New Thread

New Group on Linked In

New Group on Linked In

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:22:28 +0000

109 lines

New Thread

NPM: RE: Friday Question - Expired Processing Agreement

NPM: RE: Friday Question - Expired Processing Agreement

Dodgson, Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Mar 2011 13:43:47 +0000

90 lines

New Thread

Passing on company details for cold calling purposes

Passing on company details for cold calling purposes

Ward, Ciaran <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:43:07 +0000

337 lines

Re: Passing on company details for cold calling purposes

Cotterill, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:50:35 -0000

612 lines

Re: Passing on company details for cold calling purposes

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:55:56 -0000

586 lines

Re: Passing on company details for cold calling purposes

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Mar 2011 09:46:32 +0000

393 lines

Re: Passing on company details for cold calling purposes

Ward, Ciaran <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:04:23 +0000

452 lines

New Thread

PC security of foster carers

PC security of foster carers

Michelle Peel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Mar 2011 13:21:26 +0000

54 lines

New Thread

Performance - Who Scored Best?

Performance - Who Scored Best?

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:04:24 +0000

98 lines

New Thread

Personal Images on work > computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?) [Long post]

Re: Personal Images on work > computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?) [Long post]

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:07:27 +0100

144 lines

Re: Personal Images on work > computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?) [Long post]

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:14:32 +0100

134 lines

New Thread

Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?)

Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?)

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Mar 2011 13:12:33 +0100

397 lines

Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?)

Dodgson, Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Mar 2011 13:19:02 +0100

484 lines

Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?)

Andrew Charlesworth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Mar 2011 08:32:14 -0400

215 lines

Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?)

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Mar 2011 14:20:16 +0100

144 lines

Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?)

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Mar 2011 16:26:17 +0100

236 lines

Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?)

Andrew Charlesworth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Mar 2011 13:49:24 -0400

165 lines

Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?)

Joe Sutton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Mar 2011 08:48:26 +0100

470 lines

New Thread

Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?) [Long post]

Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?) [Long post]

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Mar 2011 09:46:30 +0100

402 lines

Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?) [Long post]

Dinsdale, Peter <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Mar 2011 10:16:53 +0100

773 lines

Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?) [Long post]

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:02:22 +0100

238 lines

Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?) [Long post]

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:36:29 +0100

434 lines

Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?) [Long post]

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:47:29 +0100

610 lines

Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?) [Long post]

Andrew Charlesworth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:30:00 -0400

240 lines

Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?) [Long post]

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Mar 2011 18:40:38 +0100

73 lines

New Thread

Personal Images on work computers shorter post

Personal Images on work computers shorter post

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:34:55 +0100

279 lines

Re: Personal Images on work computers shorter post

Ben Plouviez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:57:32 +0100

584 lines

New Thread

Privacy in Public

Privacy in Public

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Mar 2011 11:04:30 +0000

44 lines

New Thread

PVP list to ONS

PVP list to ONS

Tim Rodgers <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Mar 2011 15:52:49 -0000

190 lines

Re: PVP list to ONS

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Mar 2011 15:55:49 -0000

383 lines

Re: PVP list to ONS

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Mar 2011 16:01:06 -0000

446 lines

Re: PVP list to ONS

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Mar 2011 16:10:26 +0000

420 lines

Re: PVP list to ONS

Tim Rodgers <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Mar 2011 16:44:45 -0000

661 lines

New Thread

Retention: Adult Alleged Abuser Records

Retention: Adult Alleged Abuser Records

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Mar 2011 09:03:00 +0000

219 lines

New Thread

revision to PECR changes

revision to PECR changes

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:14:24 -0000

367 lines

New Thread

Right to be forgotten

Right to be forgotten

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:13:00 +0100

49 lines

New Thread

RIPSA Forms Guidance Manual

RIPSA Forms Guidance Manual

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Mar 2011 11:31:09 +0000

41 lines

New Thread

Royston ANPR

Royston ANPR

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Mar 2011 22:51:04 +0100

34 lines

New Thread

SAR from a debtor

SAR from a debtor

Trevor Pearce <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2011 16:52:28 -0000

209 lines

Re: SAR from a debtor

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2011 16:58:56 +0000

441 lines

New Thread

Schools and the Student Support Centre

Re: Schools and the Student Support Centre

Carolyn Howard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Mar 2011 16:05:28 +0000

30 lines

Re: Schools and the Student Support Centre

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Mar 2011 17:44:57 -0000

71 lines

Re: Schools and the Student Support Centre

Carolyn Howard <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Mar 2011 09:14:16 +0000

94 lines

New Thread

Sharing Information from PVP Lists

Sharing Information from PVP Lists

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Mar 2011 13:55:12 +0000

44 lines

New Thread

Sorry to inflict this on you: ISEB Data Protection Exam Results

Sorry to inflict this on you: ISEB Data Protection Exam Results

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Mar 2011 13:02:18 -0000

449 lines

Re: Sorry to inflict this on you: ISEB Data Protection Exam Results

Dave and Suzy Ensor <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:13:06 -0000

703 lines

Re: Sorry to inflict this on you: ISEB Data Protection Exam Results

Giles, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:14:42 -0000

296 lines

Re: Sorry to inflict this on you: ISEB Data Protection Exam Results

Paula Tighe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:21:02 -0000

348 lines

Re: Sorry to inflict this on you: ISEB Data Protection Exam Results

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:19:45 -0000

348 lines

New Thread

Staff rights v Student rights

Staff rights v Student rights

Trevor Pearce <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:17:47 -0000

218 lines

Re: Staff rights v Student rights

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:45:43 +0000

472 lines

Re: Staff rights v Student rights

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:08:45 -0000

170 lines

New Thread

Surveillance and CCTV

Surveillance and CCTV

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:13:15 +0100

94 lines

New Thread

Today's Information Law Daily

Today's Information Law Daily

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:48:13 +0000

43 lines

New Thread

Trying to locate a decision

Trying to locate a decision

Andrew Goodfellow <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:57:50 +0000

37 lines

Re: Trying to locate a decision

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:12:13 +0000

79 lines

Re: Trying to locate a decision

Andrew Goodfellow <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:57:04 +0000

29 lines

New Thread

Use of Image - Children/Adult

Use of Image - Children/Adult

Cotterill, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Mar 2011 10:47:17 -0000

184 lines

Re: Use of Image - Children/Adult

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:09:01 -0000

410 lines

Re: Use of Image - Children/Adult

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:13:55 +0000

642 lines

Re: Use of Image - Children/Adult

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:08:31 -0000

433 lines

Re: Use of Image - Children/Adult

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:16:00 +0000

607 lines

Re: Use of Image - Children/Adult

Ray Cooke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:40:26 +0000

539 lines

Re: Use of Image - Children/Adult

Cotterill, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:16:06 -0000

931 lines

New Thread

Working Paper on the Regulation of Privacy published

Working Paper on the Regulation of Privacy published

Busch, Andreas <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Mar 2011 20:17:23 +0100

53 lines

New Thread

[UNCLASSIFIED] Passing on company details for cold calling purposes

Re: [UNCLASSIFIED] Passing on company details for cold calling purposes

Harrison, Iain <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Mar 2011 09:36:43 +0000

497 lines

New Thread

[UNCLASSIFIED] [data-protection] CCTV: s.29 or PACE?

Re: [UNCLASSIFIED] [data-protection] CCTV: s.29 or PACE?

Harrison, Iain <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Mar 2011 12:34:44 +0000

131 lines

Re: [UNCLASSIFIED] [data-protection] CCTV: s.29 or PACE?

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Mar 2011 12:47:23 +0000

196 lines

Re: [UNCLASSIFIED] [data-protection] CCTV: s.29 or PACE?

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Mar 2011 12:47:24 -0000

212 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager