JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


March 2011


View:

Show Author | Hide Author

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject

From

Date Sorted by Date, Most Recent First

Size

Royston ANPR

chris pounder

Thu, 31 Mar 2011 22:51:04 +0100

34 lines

DPA and debt chasing your views on fairness

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:32:09 +0100

329 lines

Re: Email Policy Query

Roland Perry

Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:21:11 +0100

81 lines

Re: Personal Images on work > computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?) [Long post]

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:14:32 +0100

134 lines

Right to be forgotten

Ian Welton

Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:13:00 +0100

49 lines

Re: Personal Images on work > computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?) [Long post]

Ian Welton

Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:07:27 +0100

144 lines

ETICA newsletter second edition March

CCSR Web Master

Thu, 31 Mar 2011 16:24:24 +0100

36 lines

Re: Email Policy Query

Bradshaw, Phillip

Thu, 31 Mar 2011 14:47:22 +0100

148 lines

Re: Email Policy Query

Roland Perry

Thu, 31 Mar 2011 13:54:14 +0100

49 lines

Re: Email Policy Query

David Wilson

Thu, 31 Mar 2011 12:32:29 +0100

197 lines

Re: Email Policy Query

Baines, Jonathan

Thu, 31 Mar 2011 12:26:29 +0100

118 lines

Email Policy Query

David Wilson

Thu, 31 Mar 2011 12:19:28 +0100

55 lines

Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?) [Long post]

Lawrence Serewicz

Wed, 30 Mar 2011 18:40:38 +0100

73 lines

Re: Personal Images on work computers shorter post

Ben Plouviez

Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:57:32 +0100

584 lines

Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?) [Long post]

Andrew Charlesworth

Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:30:00 -0400

240 lines

Personal Images on work computers shorter post

Lawrence Serewicz

Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:34:55 +0100

279 lines

Surveillance and CCTV

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:13:15 +0100

94 lines

Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?) [Long post]

Lawrence Serewicz

Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:47:29 +0100

610 lines

More breaches

datap

Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:52:31 +0100

149 lines

Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?) [Long post]

Baines, Jonathan

Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:36:29 +0100

434 lines

Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?) [Long post]

Donald Henderson

Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:02:22 +0100

238 lines

Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?) [Long post]

Dinsdale, Peter

Wed, 30 Mar 2011 10:16:53 +0100

773 lines

Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?) [Long post]

Lawrence Serewicz

Wed, 30 Mar 2011 09:46:30 +0100

402 lines

Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?)

Joe Sutton

Wed, 30 Mar 2011 08:48:26 +0100

470 lines

Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?)

Andrew Charlesworth

Tue, 29 Mar 2011 13:49:24 -0400

165 lines

Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?)

Lawrence Serewicz

Tue, 29 Mar 2011 16:26:17 +0100

236 lines

Re: Does Police charging an individual (holding inappropriate images) provide sufficient right for an employer to investigate their electronic accounts and desk space?

Griffiths, Ian

Tue, 29 Mar 2011 14:23:21 +0100

122 lines

Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?)

Griffiths, Ian

Tue, 29 Mar 2011 14:20:16 +0100

144 lines

Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?)

Andrew Charlesworth

Tue, 29 Mar 2011 08:32:14 -0400

215 lines

Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?)

Dodgson, Paul

Tue, 29 Mar 2011 13:19:02 +0100

484 lines

Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?)

Lawrence Serewicz

Tue, 29 Mar 2011 13:12:33 +0100

397 lines

Re: Does Police charging an individual (holding inappropriate images) provide sufficient right for an employer to investigate their electronic accounts and desk space?

Andrew Cormack

Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:54:13 +0000

102 lines

Fw: [data-protection] Does Police charging an individual (holding inappropriate images) provide sufficient right for an employer to investigate their electronic accounts and desk space?

Julian Curmi

Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:49:56 +0200

317 lines

Re: Does Police charging an individual (holding inappropriate images) provide sufficient right for an employer to investigate their electronic accounts and desk space?

Chris Bayliss (ITS)

Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:28:54 +0100

94 lines

Does Police charging an individual (holding inappropriate images) provide sufficient right for an employer to investigate their electronic accounts and desk space?

Graham Wilford

Tue, 29 Mar 2011 08:46:54 +0100

60 lines

Re: is this legal?

CHARLES OPPENHEIM

Mon, 28 Mar 2011 18:54:48 +0100

297 lines

FW: Cpd25: Data Protection For Library Staff [Event Ref. No. TG2/DP]

Vicky Robertson

Mon, 28 Mar 2011 06:39:42 -0700

197 lines

Compromise agreements, bonus payments etc.

Ibrahim Hasan

Mon, 28 Mar 2011 12:44:46 +0100

93 lines

Re: is this legal?

Paul Ticher

Mon, 28 Mar 2011 12:10:55 +0100

131 lines

FW: Hawktalk: time to forget about a "right to forget"

chris pounder

Mon, 28 Mar 2011 11:56:23 +0100

287 lines

FW: Cpd25: Data Protection For Library Staff [Event Ref. No. TG2/DP]

Vicky Robertson

Mon, 28 Mar 2011 01:27:48 -0700

151 lines

Re: is this legal?

Bradshaw, Phillip

Sat, 26 Mar 2011 20:46:05 -0000

463 lines

is this legal?

CHARLES OPPENHEIM

Sat, 26 Mar 2011 18:01:31 +0000

137 lines

PC security of foster carers

Michelle Peel

Fri, 25 Mar 2011 13:21:26 +0000

54 lines

Data sharing for multi-agency customer journey mapping

Michelle Peel

Fri, 25 Mar 2011 13:03:35 +0000

87 lines

Re: Staff rights v Student rights

Paul Ticher

Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:08:45 -0000

170 lines

Re: Staff rights v Student rights

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:45:43 +0000

472 lines

Staff rights v Student rights

Trevor Pearce

Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:17:47 -0000

218 lines

Re: Schools and the Student Support Centre

Carolyn Howard

Wed, 23 Mar 2011 09:14:16 +0000

94 lines

Re: Schools and the Student Support Centre

Simon Howarth

Tue, 22 Mar 2011 17:44:57 -0000

71 lines

Re: Schools and the Student Support Centre

Carolyn Howard

Tue, 22 Mar 2011 16:05:28 +0000

30 lines

Re: Trying to locate a decision

Andrew Goodfellow

Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:57:04 +0000

29 lines

Data Protection Manager Opportunity (London) - Maternity Cover

Davies, Sarah

Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:21:52 -0000

616 lines

Moving On

Giles, Kevin

Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:18:51 -0000

340 lines

Re: Trying to locate a decision

Ibrahim Hasan

Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:12:13 +0000

79 lines

Trying to locate a decision

Andrew Goodfellow

Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:57:50 +0000

37 lines

Hawktalk: The confidentiality of personal data in the Census 2011 is not guaranteed

chris pounder

Sat, 19 Mar 2011 13:21:11 -0000

227 lines

NPM: RE: Friday Question - Expired Processing Agreement

Dodgson, Paul

Fri, 18 Mar 2011 13:43:47 +0000

90 lines

Friday Question - Expired Processing Agreement

Phil Bradshaw

Fri, 18 Mar 2011 13:03:40 +0000

45 lines

Re: Debt Collection Agencies

Chris Brogan

Fri, 18 Mar 2011 10:21:11 +0000

244 lines

Re: Debt Collection Agencies

Paul Ticher

Fri, 18 Mar 2011 09:59:35 -0000

175 lines

Re: Don't Get IT

Baines, Jonathan

Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:22:10 +0000

461 lines

Re: Don't Get IT

Marchini, Renzo

Thu, 17 Mar 2011 11:21:25 -0400

445 lines

Housing Benefit Files

Jane Holden

Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:50:01 -0000

63 lines

Debt Collection Agencies

Terry Hutchinson

Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:31:38 -0000

448 lines

Re: Lollicam

Donald Henderson

Thu, 17 Mar 2011 12:59:04 -0000

249 lines

Re: Don't Get IT

Baines, Jonathan

Thu, 17 Mar 2011 12:40:29 +0000

414 lines

Choice of exemptions

Ian Welton

Thu, 17 Mar 2011 11:06:00 +0000

50 lines

Re: Lollicam

Bradshaw, Phillip

Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:25:18 -0000

181 lines

Re: Lollicam

Gibson, Martin (ICT)

Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:17:21 +0000

235 lines

Re: Lollicam

Scourfield, Brenda

Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:12:27 -0000

174 lines

Re: Lollicam

Donald Henderson

Thu, 17 Mar 2011 09:59:22 -0000

101 lines

Lollicam

Phil Bradshaw

Thu, 17 Mar 2011 09:55:35 +0000

30 lines

Retention: Adult Alleged Abuser Records

Bailey, Trish

Thu, 17 Mar 2011 09:03:00 +0000

219 lines

Re: Don't Get IT

Jethro R Binks

Thu, 17 Mar 2011 08:53:03 +0000

65 lines

Re: Don't Get IT

Andrew Cormack

Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:37:24 +0000

405 lines

Re: Don't Get IT

Marchini, Renzo

Wed, 16 Mar 2011 12:54:40 -0400

358 lines

Re: Don't Get IT

Griffiths, Ian

Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:37:26 -0000

278 lines

New Group on Linked In

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:22:28 +0000

109 lines

Re: Sorry to inflict this on you: ISEB Data Protection Exam Results

Griffiths, Ian

Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:19:45 -0000

348 lines

Re: Don't Get IT

Scourfield, Brenda

Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:35:43 -0000

572 lines

Re: Sorry to inflict this on you: ISEB Data Protection Exam Results

Paula Tighe

Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:21:02 -0000

348 lines

Re: Sorry to inflict this on you: ISEB Data Protection Exam Results

Giles, Kevin

Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:14:42 -0000

296 lines

Re: Sorry to inflict this on you: ISEB Data Protection Exam Results

Dave and Suzy Ensor

Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:13:06 -0000

703 lines

Re: Don't Get IT

Giles, Kevin

Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:10:51 -0000

238 lines

Performance - Who Scored Best?

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:04:24 +0000

98 lines

Re: Don't Get IT

Donald Henderson

Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:01:25 -0000

333 lines

Don't Get IT

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 16 Mar 2011 13:57:25 +0000

106 lines

Sorry to inflict this on you: ISEB Data Protection Exam Results

chris pounder

Wed, 16 Mar 2011 13:02:18 -0000

449 lines

ISEB Data Protection Exam Results

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:41:55 +0000

149 lines

Name & Shame ?

Brenda Scourfield

Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:34:51 +0000

30 lines

Information Rights Conference

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 16 Mar 2011 09:01:08 +0000

45 lines

Cartoon to celebrate the Internet

chris pounder

Wed, 16 Mar 2011 00:55:05 -0000

221 lines

council docs in a skip

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 15 Mar 2011 18:29:36 +0000

40 lines

Re: CLI

Bradshaw, Phillip

Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:16:16 -0000

163 lines

Re: CLI

Jane Holden

Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:04:35 -0000

132 lines

Re: CLI

Scourfield, Brenda

Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:58:48 -0000

157 lines

Re: CLI

Bradshaw, Phillip

Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:15:20 -0000

77 lines

Re: CLI

Jane Holden

Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:59:52 -0000

273 lines

Re: CLI

Griffiths, Ian

Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:59:50 -0000

200 lines

Re: CLI

Donald Henderson

Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:55:46 -0000

160 lines

Re: CLI

Griffiths, Ian

Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:42:33 -0000

66 lines

CLI

Phil Bradshaw

Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:23:08 +0000

44 lines

Re: Hand-written notes

Bradshaw, Phillip

Mon, 14 Mar 2011 16:28:50 -0000

613 lines

Re: Hand-written notes

Samantha Hill

Mon, 14 Mar 2011 16:22:15 +0000

327 lines

Re: Hand-written notes

David Wilson

Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:12:54 +0000

131 lines

Re: Hand-written notes

Simon Macauley

Mon, 14 Mar 2011 14:50:02 +0000

72 lines

Hand-written notes

Wendy Evans

Mon, 14 Mar 2011 14:47:19 +0000

38 lines

Re: Civil Parking Enforcement

Jane Holden

Mon, 14 Mar 2011 08:38:14 -0000

93 lines

Civil Parking Enforcement

Phil Bradshaw

Sat, 12 Mar 2011 22:28:59 +0000

34 lines

Re: Freedom Fighting

chris pounder

Fri, 11 Mar 2011 16:45:41 -0000

499 lines

Re: Freedom Fighting

Ibrahim Hasan

Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:13:11 +0000

175 lines

Re: Passing on company details for cold calling purposes

Ward, Ciaran

Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:04:23 +0000

452 lines

Freedom Fighting

chris pounder

Fri, 11 Mar 2011 14:36:33 -0000

37 lines

Freedom Fighting

Ibrahim Hasan

Fri, 11 Mar 2011 13:40:44 +0000

44 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Cookies

Roland Perry

Fri, 11 Mar 2011 12:13:01 +0000

42 lines

Re: Passing on company details for cold calling purposes

Bailey, Trish

Fri, 11 Mar 2011 09:46:32 +0000

393 lines

Re: [UNCLASSIFIED] Passing on company details for cold calling purposes

Harrison, Iain

Fri, 11 Mar 2011 09:36:43 +0000

497 lines

Re: Cookies

Marchini, Renzo

Fri, 11 Mar 2011 03:33:31 -0500

522 lines

FW: [data-protection] Cookies

Chris Spray

Fri, 11 Mar 2011 07:01:35 -0000

737 lines

Re: Passing on company details for cold calling purposes

Bradshaw, Phillip

Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:55:56 -0000

586 lines

Re: Passing on company details for cold calling purposes

Cotterill, Steve

Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:50:35 -0000

612 lines

Passing on company details for cold calling purposes

Ward, Ciaran

Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:43:07 +0000

337 lines

Re: Use of Image - Children/Adult

Cotterill, Steve

Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:16:06 -0000

931 lines

revision to PECR changes

chris pounder

Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:14:24 -0000

367 lines

Re: Cookies

Marchini, Renzo

Thu, 10 Mar 2011 09:08:26 -0500

655 lines

Re: Cookies

Donald Henderson

Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:57:36 -0000

358 lines

Cookies

Ibrahim Hasan

Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:43:17 +0000

118 lines

Re: Use of Image - Children/Adult

Ray Cooke

Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:40:26 +0000

539 lines

Re: Use of Image - Children/Adult

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:16:00 +0000

607 lines

Re: Use of Image - Children/Adult

Baines, Jonathan

Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:13:55 +0000

642 lines

Re: Use of Image - Children/Adult

Donald Henderson

Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:09:01 -0000

410 lines

Re: Use of Image - Children/Adult

Bradshaw, Phillip

Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:08:31 -0000

433 lines

Use of Image - Children/Adult

Cotterill, Steve

Thu, 10 Mar 2011 10:47:17 -0000

184 lines

Local authority surveillance - the new law

Ibrahim Hasan

Thu, 10 Mar 2011 08:43:46 +0000

46 lines

Working Paper on the Regulation of Privacy published

Busch, Andreas

Wed, 9 Mar 2011 20:17:23 +0100

53 lines

Re: PVP list to ONS

Tim Rodgers

Wed, 9 Mar 2011 16:44:45 -0000

661 lines

Re: CCTV

Lawrence Serewicz

Wed, 9 Mar 2011 16:19:36 +0000

442 lines

Re: PVP list to ONS

Baines, Jonathan

Wed, 9 Mar 2011 16:10:26 +0000

420 lines

Re: PVP list to ONS

Donald Henderson

Wed, 9 Mar 2011 16:01:06 -0000

446 lines

Re: PVP list to ONS

Jane Holden

Wed, 9 Mar 2011 15:55:49 -0000

383 lines

PVP list to ONS

Tim Rodgers

Wed, 9 Mar 2011 15:52:49 -0000

190 lines

Re: CCTV

Dinsdale, Peter

Wed, 9 Mar 2011 15:51:27 -0000

393 lines

Re: CCTV

Lawrence Serewicz

Wed, 9 Mar 2011 08:28:34 +0000

488 lines

Re: CCTV

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee

Wed, 9 Mar 2011 08:10:05 -0000

396 lines

Privacy in Public

Ian Welton

Tue, 8 Mar 2011 11:04:30 +0000

44 lines

Re: CCTV

Lawrence Serewicz

Tue, 8 Mar 2011 10:57:55 +0000

372 lines

Re: CCTV

Bradshaw, Phillip

Tue, 8 Mar 2011 10:44:47 -0000

302 lines

Re: CCTV

Paul Ticher

Tue, 8 Mar 2011 10:24:55 -0000

211 lines

RIPSA Forms Guidance Manual

Ibrahim Hasan

Mon, 7 Mar 2011 11:31:09 +0000

41 lines

Free web seminar this morning

Ibrahim Hasan

Mon, 7 Mar 2011 08:57:24 +0000

48 lines

Hawktalk: RIPA changes in Freedoms Bill: negligible improvement in privacy protection

chris pounder

Mon, 7 Mar 2011 00:17:31 -0000

200 lines

Re: SAR from a debtor

Baines, Jonathan

Fri, 4 Mar 2011 16:58:56 +0000

441 lines

SAR from a debtor

Trevor Pearce

Fri, 4 Mar 2011 16:52:28 -0000

209 lines

Re: CCTV

Bradshaw, Phillip

Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:52:23 -0000

79 lines

Re: CCTV

Bradshaw, Phillip

Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:49:18 -0000

258 lines

Re: CCTV

Lawrence Serewicz

Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:42:20 +0000

236 lines

Re: CCTV

Scourfield, Brenda

Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:34:35 -0000

237 lines

Re: CCTV

Lawrence Serewicz

Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:24:55 +0000

157 lines

Re: CCTV

Scourfield, Brenda

Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:23:14 -0000

204 lines

Re: CCTV

Bradshaw, Phillip

Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:09:17 -0000

104 lines

Re: CCTV

Scourfield, Brenda

Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:03:48 -0000

330 lines

Re: CCTV

Simon Macauley

Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:00:41 +0000

254 lines

Re: CCTV

Lawrence Serewicz

Fri, 4 Mar 2011 12:52:12 +0000

214 lines

Re: CCTV

Bradshaw, Phillip

Fri, 4 Mar 2011 12:10:47 -0000

123 lines

Re: CCTV

Broom, Doreen

Fri, 4 Mar 2011 12:08:44 +0000

169 lines

Re: CCTV

Scourfield, Brenda

Fri, 4 Mar 2011 12:05:21 -0000

163 lines

Re: CCTV

Broom, Doreen

Fri, 4 Mar 2011 12:01:47 +0000

77 lines

CCTV

Brenda Scourfield

Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:56:42 +0000

34 lines

Today's Information Law Daily

Ibrahim Hasan

Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:48:13 +0000

43 lines

For those interested in Facebook settings

chris pounder

Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:12:28 -0000

29 lines

Informatics 2011 (Rome, Italy) - 1st call extension: until 28 March 2011

Natalia Teixeira

Thu, 3 Mar 2011 17:03:47 +0000

169 lines

DM 2011 (Rome, Italy) - 1st call extension: until 28 March 2011

Natalia Teixeira

Thu, 3 Mar 2011 17:02:29 +0000

135 lines

Sharing Information from PVP Lists

Ibrahim Hasan

Thu, 3 Mar 2011 13:55:12 +0000

44 lines

Enquiry about speaking at CPD25 course - 31/3/2011

Vicky Robertson

Thu, 3 Mar 2011 08:25:27 +0000

60 lines

ICO evidence identifies data protection concerns over Freedoms Bill

chris pounder

Thu, 3 Mar 2011 01:38:50 -0000

230 lines

free web seminars

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 2 Mar 2011 13:55:07 +0000

49 lines

New CCTV Code

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 2 Mar 2011 09:56:34 +0000

102 lines

Re: CCTV: s.29 or PACE?

Bradshaw, Phillip

Tue, 1 Mar 2011 15:01:26 -0000

196 lines

CCTV: s.29 or PACE?

Ian Welton

Tue, 1 Mar 2011 14:48:51 +0000

114 lines

Re: [UNCLASSIFIED] [data-protection] CCTV: s.29 or PACE?

Bradshaw, Phillip

Tue, 1 Mar 2011 12:47:24 -0000

212 lines

Re: [UNCLASSIFIED] [data-protection] CCTV: s.29 or PACE?

Baines, Jonathan

Tue, 1 Mar 2011 12:47:23 +0000

196 lines

Re: [UNCLASSIFIED] [data-protection] CCTV: s.29 or PACE?

Harrison, Iain

Tue, 1 Mar 2011 12:34:44 +0000

131 lines

CCTV: s.29 or PACE?

Matt Morrison

Tue, 1 Mar 2011 12:24:05 +0000

61 lines

Re: Credit Card Fraud

Roland Perry

Tue, 1 Mar 2011 12:15:36 +0000

58 lines

Re: Credit Card Fraud

Watts, Clare (C.)

Tue, 1 Mar 2011 09:44:21 -0000

190 lines

Re: Credit Card Fraud

Baines, Jonathan

Tue, 1 Mar 2011 09:42:15 +0000

158 lines

Re: Credit Card Fraud

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 1 Mar 2011 07:56:20 +0000

114 lines

Re: Credit Card Fraud

Watts, Clare (C.)

Tue, 1 Mar 2011 07:48:30 -0000

95 lines

Credit Card Fraud

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 1 Mar 2011 07:41:22 +0000

41 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager