|
|
|
Size
|
Royston ANPR
|
chris pounder |
Thu, 31 Mar 2011 22:51:04 +0100 |
34 lines |
DPA and debt chasing your views on fairness
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:32:09 +0100 |
329 lines |
Re: Email Policy Query
|
Roland Perry |
Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:21:11 +0100 |
81 lines |
Re: Personal Images on work > computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?) [Long post]
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:14:32 +0100 |
134 lines |
Right to be forgotten
|
Ian Welton |
Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:13:00 +0100 |
49 lines |
Re: Personal Images on work > computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?) [Long post]
|
Ian Welton |
Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:07:27 +0100 |
144 lines |
ETICA newsletter second edition March
|
CCSR Web Master |
Thu, 31 Mar 2011 16:24:24 +0100 |
36 lines |
Re: Email Policy Query
|
Bradshaw, Phillip |
Thu, 31 Mar 2011 14:47:22 +0100 |
148 lines |
Re: Email Policy Query
|
Roland Perry |
Thu, 31 Mar 2011 13:54:14 +0100 |
49 lines |
Re: Email Policy Query
|
David Wilson |
Thu, 31 Mar 2011 12:32:29 +0100 |
197 lines |
Re: Email Policy Query
|
Baines, Jonathan |
Thu, 31 Mar 2011 12:26:29 +0100 |
118 lines |
Email Policy Query
|
David Wilson |
Thu, 31 Mar 2011 12:19:28 +0100 |
55 lines |
Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?) [Long post]
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Wed, 30 Mar 2011 18:40:38 +0100 |
73 lines |
Re: Personal Images on work computers shorter post
|
Ben Plouviez |
Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:57:32 +0100 |
584 lines |
Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?) [Long post]
|
Andrew Charlesworth |
Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:30:00 -0400 |
240 lines |
Personal Images on work computers shorter post
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:34:55 +0100 |
279 lines |
Surveillance and CCTV
|
Ibrahim Hasan |
Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:13:15 +0100 |
94 lines |
Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?) [Long post]
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:47:29 +0100 |
610 lines |
More breaches
|
datap |
Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:52:31 +0100 |
149 lines |
Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?) [Long post]
|
Baines, Jonathan |
Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:36:29 +0100 |
434 lines |
Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?) [Long post]
|
Donald Henderson |
Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:02:22 +0100 |
238 lines |
Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?) [Long post]
|
Dinsdale, Peter |
Wed, 30 Mar 2011 10:16:53 +0100 |
773 lines |
Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?) [Long post]
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Wed, 30 Mar 2011 09:46:30 +0100 |
402 lines |
Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?)
|
Joe Sutton |
Wed, 30 Mar 2011 08:48:26 +0100 |
470 lines |
Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?)
|
Andrew Charlesworth |
Tue, 29 Mar 2011 13:49:24 -0400 |
165 lines |
Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?)
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Tue, 29 Mar 2011 16:26:17 +0100 |
236 lines |
Re: Does Police charging an individual (holding inappropriate images) provide sufficient right for an employer to investigate their electronic accounts and desk space?
|
Griffiths, Ian |
Tue, 29 Mar 2011 14:23:21 +0100 |
122 lines |
Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?)
|
Griffiths, Ian |
Tue, 29 Mar 2011 14:20:16 +0100 |
144 lines |
Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?)
|
Andrew Charlesworth |
Tue, 29 Mar 2011 08:32:14 -0400 |
215 lines |
Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?)
|
Dodgson, Paul |
Tue, 29 Mar 2011 13:19:02 +0100 |
484 lines |
Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?)
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Tue, 29 Mar 2011 13:12:33 +0100 |
397 lines |
Re: Does Police charging an individual (holding inappropriate images) provide sufficient right for an employer to investigate their electronic accounts and desk space?
|
Andrew Cormack |
Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:54:13 +0000 |
102 lines |
Fw: [data-protection] Does Police charging an individual (holding inappropriate images) provide sufficient right for an employer to investigate their electronic accounts and desk space?
|
Julian Curmi |
Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:49:56 +0200 |
317 lines |
Re: Does Police charging an individual (holding inappropriate images) provide sufficient right for an employer to investigate their electronic accounts and desk space?
|
Chris Bayliss (ITS) |
Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:28:54 +0100 |
94 lines |
Does Police charging an individual (holding inappropriate images) provide sufficient right for an employer to investigate their electronic accounts and desk space?
|
Graham Wilford |
Tue, 29 Mar 2011 08:46:54 +0100 |
60 lines |
Re: is this legal?
|
CHARLES OPPENHEIM |
Mon, 28 Mar 2011 18:54:48 +0100 |
297 lines |
FW: Cpd25: Data Protection For Library Staff [Event Ref. No. TG2/DP]
|
Vicky Robertson |
Mon, 28 Mar 2011 06:39:42 -0700 |
197 lines |
Compromise agreements, bonus payments etc.
|
Ibrahim Hasan |
Mon, 28 Mar 2011 12:44:46 +0100 |
93 lines |
Re: is this legal?
|
Paul Ticher |
Mon, 28 Mar 2011 12:10:55 +0100 |
131 lines |
FW: Hawktalk: time to forget about a "right to forget"
|
chris pounder |
Mon, 28 Mar 2011 11:56:23 +0100 |
287 lines |
FW: Cpd25: Data Protection For Library Staff [Event Ref. No. TG2/DP]
|
Vicky Robertson |
Mon, 28 Mar 2011 01:27:48 -0700 |
151 lines |
Re: is this legal?
|
Bradshaw, Phillip |
Sat, 26 Mar 2011 20:46:05 -0000 |
463 lines |
is this legal?
|
CHARLES OPPENHEIM |
Sat, 26 Mar 2011 18:01:31 +0000 |
137 lines |
PC security of foster carers
|
Michelle Peel |
Fri, 25 Mar 2011 13:21:26 +0000 |
54 lines |
Data sharing for multi-agency customer journey mapping
|
Michelle Peel |
Fri, 25 Mar 2011 13:03:35 +0000 |
87 lines |
Re: Staff rights v Student rights
|
Paul Ticher |
Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:08:45 -0000 |
170 lines |
Re: Staff rights v Student rights
|
Broom, Doreen |
Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:45:43 +0000 |
472 lines |
Staff rights v Student rights
|
Trevor Pearce |
Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:17:47 -0000 |
218 lines |
Re: Schools and the Student Support Centre
|
Carolyn Howard |
Wed, 23 Mar 2011 09:14:16 +0000 |
94 lines |
Re: Schools and the Student Support Centre
|
Simon Howarth |
Tue, 22 Mar 2011 17:44:57 -0000 |
71 lines |
Re: Schools and the Student Support Centre
|
Carolyn Howard |
Tue, 22 Mar 2011 16:05:28 +0000 |
30 lines |
Re: Trying to locate a decision
|
Andrew Goodfellow |
Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:57:04 +0000 |
29 lines |
Data Protection Manager Opportunity (London) - Maternity Cover
|
Davies, Sarah |
Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:21:52 -0000 |
616 lines |
Moving On
|
Giles, Kevin |
Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:18:51 -0000 |
340 lines |
Re: Trying to locate a decision
|
Ibrahim Hasan |
Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:12:13 +0000 |
79 lines |
Trying to locate a decision
|
Andrew Goodfellow |
Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:57:50 +0000 |
37 lines |
Hawktalk: The confidentiality of personal data in the Census 2011 is not guaranteed
|
chris pounder |
Sat, 19 Mar 2011 13:21:11 -0000 |
227 lines |
NPM: RE: Friday Question - Expired Processing Agreement
|
Dodgson, Paul |
Fri, 18 Mar 2011 13:43:47 +0000 |
90 lines |
Friday Question - Expired Processing Agreement
|
Phil Bradshaw |
Fri, 18 Mar 2011 13:03:40 +0000 |
45 lines |
Re: Debt Collection Agencies
|
Chris Brogan |
Fri, 18 Mar 2011 10:21:11 +0000 |
244 lines |
Re: Debt Collection Agencies
|
Paul Ticher |
Fri, 18 Mar 2011 09:59:35 -0000 |
175 lines |
Re: Don't Get IT
|
Baines, Jonathan |
Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:22:10 +0000 |
461 lines |
Re: Don't Get IT
|
Marchini, Renzo |
Thu, 17 Mar 2011 11:21:25 -0400 |
445 lines |
Housing Benefit Files
|
Jane Holden |
Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:50:01 -0000 |
63 lines |
Debt Collection Agencies
|
Terry Hutchinson |
Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:31:38 -0000 |
448 lines |
Re: Lollicam
|
Donald Henderson |
Thu, 17 Mar 2011 12:59:04 -0000 |
249 lines |
Re: Don't Get IT
|
Baines, Jonathan |
Thu, 17 Mar 2011 12:40:29 +0000 |
414 lines |
Choice of exemptions
|
Ian Welton |
Thu, 17 Mar 2011 11:06:00 +0000 |
50 lines |
Re: Lollicam
|
Bradshaw, Phillip |
Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:25:18 -0000 |
181 lines |
Re: Lollicam
|
Gibson, Martin (ICT) |
Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:17:21 +0000 |
235 lines |
Re: Lollicam
|
Scourfield, Brenda |
Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:12:27 -0000 |
174 lines |
Re: Lollicam
|
Donald Henderson |
Thu, 17 Mar 2011 09:59:22 -0000 |
101 lines |
Lollicam
|
Phil Bradshaw |
Thu, 17 Mar 2011 09:55:35 +0000 |
30 lines |
Retention: Adult Alleged Abuser Records
|
Bailey, Trish |
Thu, 17 Mar 2011 09:03:00 +0000 |
219 lines |
Re: Don't Get IT
|
Jethro R Binks |
Thu, 17 Mar 2011 08:53:03 +0000 |
65 lines |
Re: Don't Get IT
|
Andrew Cormack |
Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:37:24 +0000 |
405 lines |
Re: Don't Get IT
|
Marchini, Renzo |
Wed, 16 Mar 2011 12:54:40 -0400 |
358 lines |
Re: Don't Get IT
|
Griffiths, Ian |
Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:37:26 -0000 |
278 lines |
New Group on Linked In
|
Ibrahim Hasan |
Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:22:28 +0000 |
109 lines |
Re: Sorry to inflict this on you: ISEB Data Protection Exam Results
|
Griffiths, Ian |
Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:19:45 -0000 |
348 lines |
Re: Don't Get IT
|
Scourfield, Brenda |
Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:35:43 -0000 |
572 lines |
Re: Sorry to inflict this on you: ISEB Data Protection Exam Results
|
Paula Tighe |
Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:21:02 -0000 |
348 lines |
Re: Sorry to inflict this on you: ISEB Data Protection Exam Results
|
Giles, Kevin |
Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:14:42 -0000 |
296 lines |
Re: Sorry to inflict this on you: ISEB Data Protection Exam Results
|
Dave and Suzy Ensor |
Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:13:06 -0000 |
703 lines |
Re: Don't Get IT
|
Giles, Kevin |
Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:10:51 -0000 |
238 lines |
Performance - Who Scored Best?
|
Ibrahim Hasan |
Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:04:24 +0000 |
98 lines |
Re: Don't Get IT
|
Donald Henderson |
Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:01:25 -0000 |
333 lines |
Don't Get IT
|
Ibrahim Hasan |
Wed, 16 Mar 2011 13:57:25 +0000 |
106 lines |
Sorry to inflict this on you: ISEB Data Protection Exam Results
|
chris pounder |
Wed, 16 Mar 2011 13:02:18 -0000 |
449 lines |
ISEB Data Protection Exam Results
|
Ibrahim Hasan |
Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:41:55 +0000 |
149 lines |
Name & Shame ?
|
Brenda Scourfield |
Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:34:51 +0000 |
30 lines |
Information Rights Conference
|
Ibrahim Hasan |
Wed, 16 Mar 2011 09:01:08 +0000 |
45 lines |
Cartoon to celebrate the Internet
|
chris pounder |
Wed, 16 Mar 2011 00:55:05 -0000 |
221 lines |
council docs in a skip
|
Ibrahim Hasan |
Tue, 15 Mar 2011 18:29:36 +0000 |
40 lines |
Re: CLI
|
Bradshaw, Phillip |
Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:16:16 -0000 |
163 lines |
Re: CLI
|
Jane Holden |
Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:04:35 -0000 |
132 lines |
Re: CLI
|
Scourfield, Brenda |
Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:58:48 -0000 |
157 lines |
Re: CLI
|
Bradshaw, Phillip |
Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:15:20 -0000 |
77 lines |
Re: CLI
|
Jane Holden |
Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:59:52 -0000 |
273 lines |
Re: CLI
|
Griffiths, Ian |
Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:59:50 -0000 |
200 lines |
Re: CLI
|
Donald Henderson |
Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:55:46 -0000 |
160 lines |
Re: CLI
|
Griffiths, Ian |
Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:42:33 -0000 |
66 lines |
CLI
|
Phil Bradshaw |
Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:23:08 +0000 |
44 lines |
Re: Hand-written notes
|
Bradshaw, Phillip |
Mon, 14 Mar 2011 16:28:50 -0000 |
613 lines |
Re: Hand-written notes
|
Samantha Hill |
Mon, 14 Mar 2011 16:22:15 +0000 |
327 lines |
Re: Hand-written notes
|
David Wilson |
Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:12:54 +0000 |
131 lines |
Re: Hand-written notes
|
Simon Macauley |
Mon, 14 Mar 2011 14:50:02 +0000 |
72 lines |
Hand-written notes
|
Wendy Evans |
Mon, 14 Mar 2011 14:47:19 +0000 |
38 lines |
Re: Civil Parking Enforcement
|
Jane Holden |
Mon, 14 Mar 2011 08:38:14 -0000 |
93 lines |
Civil Parking Enforcement
|
Phil Bradshaw |
Sat, 12 Mar 2011 22:28:59 +0000 |
34 lines |
Re: Freedom Fighting
|
chris pounder |
Fri, 11 Mar 2011 16:45:41 -0000 |
499 lines |
Re: Freedom Fighting
|
Ibrahim Hasan |
Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:13:11 +0000 |
175 lines |
Re: Passing on company details for cold calling purposes
|
Ward, Ciaran |
Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:04:23 +0000 |
452 lines |
Freedom Fighting
|
chris pounder |
Fri, 11 Mar 2011 14:36:33 -0000 |
37 lines |
Freedom Fighting
|
Ibrahim Hasan |
Fri, 11 Mar 2011 13:40:44 +0000 |
44 lines |
Re: FW: [data-protection] Cookies
|
Roland Perry |
Fri, 11 Mar 2011 12:13:01 +0000 |
42 lines |
Re: Passing on company details for cold calling purposes
|
Bailey, Trish |
Fri, 11 Mar 2011 09:46:32 +0000 |
393 lines |
Re: [UNCLASSIFIED] Passing on company details for cold calling purposes
|
Harrison, Iain |
Fri, 11 Mar 2011 09:36:43 +0000 |
497 lines |
Re: Cookies
|
Marchini, Renzo |
Fri, 11 Mar 2011 03:33:31 -0500 |
522 lines |
FW: [data-protection] Cookies
|
Chris Spray |
Fri, 11 Mar 2011 07:01:35 -0000 |
737 lines |
Re: Passing on company details for cold calling purposes
|
Bradshaw, Phillip |
Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:55:56 -0000 |
586 lines |
Re: Passing on company details for cold calling purposes
|
Cotterill, Steve |
Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:50:35 -0000 |
612 lines |
Passing on company details for cold calling purposes
|
Ward, Ciaran |
Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:43:07 +0000 |
337 lines |
Re: Use of Image - Children/Adult
|
Cotterill, Steve |
Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:16:06 -0000 |
931 lines |
revision to PECR changes
|
chris pounder |
Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:14:24 -0000 |
367 lines |
Re: Cookies
|
Marchini, Renzo |
Thu, 10 Mar 2011 09:08:26 -0500 |
655 lines |
Re: Cookies
|
Donald Henderson |
Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:57:36 -0000 |
358 lines |
Cookies
|
Ibrahim Hasan |
Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:43:17 +0000 |
118 lines |
Re: Use of Image - Children/Adult
|
Ray Cooke |
Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:40:26 +0000 |
539 lines |
Re: Use of Image - Children/Adult
|
Broom, Doreen |
Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:16:00 +0000 |
607 lines |
Re: Use of Image - Children/Adult
|
Baines, Jonathan |
Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:13:55 +0000 |
642 lines |
Re: Use of Image - Children/Adult
|
Donald Henderson |
Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:09:01 -0000 |
410 lines |
Re: Use of Image - Children/Adult
|
Bradshaw, Phillip |
Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:08:31 -0000 |
433 lines |
Use of Image - Children/Adult
|
Cotterill, Steve |
Thu, 10 Mar 2011 10:47:17 -0000 |
184 lines |
Local authority surveillance - the new law
|
Ibrahim Hasan |
Thu, 10 Mar 2011 08:43:46 +0000 |
46 lines |
Working Paper on the Regulation of Privacy published
|
Busch, Andreas |
Wed, 9 Mar 2011 20:17:23 +0100 |
53 lines |
Re: PVP list to ONS
|
Tim Rodgers |
Wed, 9 Mar 2011 16:44:45 -0000 |
661 lines |
Re: CCTV
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Wed, 9 Mar 2011 16:19:36 +0000 |
442 lines |
Re: PVP list to ONS
|
Baines, Jonathan |
Wed, 9 Mar 2011 16:10:26 +0000 |
420 lines |
Re: PVP list to ONS
|
Donald Henderson |
Wed, 9 Mar 2011 16:01:06 -0000 |
446 lines |
Re: PVP list to ONS
|
Jane Holden |
Wed, 9 Mar 2011 15:55:49 -0000 |
383 lines |
PVP list to ONS
|
Tim Rodgers |
Wed, 9 Mar 2011 15:52:49 -0000 |
190 lines |
Re: CCTV
|
Dinsdale, Peter |
Wed, 9 Mar 2011 15:51:27 -0000 |
393 lines |
Re: CCTV
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Wed, 9 Mar 2011 08:28:34 +0000 |
488 lines |
Re: CCTV
|
SHQ - Gardiner, Lee |
Wed, 9 Mar 2011 08:10:05 -0000 |
396 lines |
Privacy in Public
|
Ian Welton |
Tue, 8 Mar 2011 11:04:30 +0000 |
44 lines |
Re: CCTV
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Tue, 8 Mar 2011 10:57:55 +0000 |
372 lines |
Re: CCTV
|
Bradshaw, Phillip |
Tue, 8 Mar 2011 10:44:47 -0000 |
302 lines |
Re: CCTV
|
Paul Ticher |
Tue, 8 Mar 2011 10:24:55 -0000 |
211 lines |
RIPSA Forms Guidance Manual
|
Ibrahim Hasan |
Mon, 7 Mar 2011 11:31:09 +0000 |
41 lines |
Free web seminar this morning
|
Ibrahim Hasan |
Mon, 7 Mar 2011 08:57:24 +0000 |
48 lines |
Hawktalk: RIPA changes in Freedoms Bill: negligible improvement in privacy protection
|
chris pounder |
Mon, 7 Mar 2011 00:17:31 -0000 |
200 lines |
Re: SAR from a debtor
|
Baines, Jonathan |
Fri, 4 Mar 2011 16:58:56 +0000 |
441 lines |
SAR from a debtor
|
Trevor Pearce |
Fri, 4 Mar 2011 16:52:28 -0000 |
209 lines |
Re: CCTV
|
Bradshaw, Phillip |
Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:52:23 -0000 |
79 lines |
Re: CCTV
|
Bradshaw, Phillip |
Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:49:18 -0000 |
258 lines |
Re: CCTV
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:42:20 +0000 |
236 lines |
Re: CCTV
|
Scourfield, Brenda |
Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:34:35 -0000 |
237 lines |
Re: CCTV
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:24:55 +0000 |
157 lines |
Re: CCTV
|
Scourfield, Brenda |
Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:23:14 -0000 |
204 lines |
Re: CCTV
|
Bradshaw, Phillip |
Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:09:17 -0000 |
104 lines |
Re: CCTV
|
Scourfield, Brenda |
Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:03:48 -0000 |
330 lines |
Re: CCTV
|
Simon Macauley |
Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:00:41 +0000 |
254 lines |
Re: CCTV
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Fri, 4 Mar 2011 12:52:12 +0000 |
214 lines |
Re: CCTV
|
Bradshaw, Phillip |
Fri, 4 Mar 2011 12:10:47 -0000 |
123 lines |
Re: CCTV
|
Broom, Doreen |
Fri, 4 Mar 2011 12:08:44 +0000 |
169 lines |
Re: CCTV
|
Scourfield, Brenda |
Fri, 4 Mar 2011 12:05:21 -0000 |
163 lines |
Re: CCTV
|
Broom, Doreen |
Fri, 4 Mar 2011 12:01:47 +0000 |
77 lines |
CCTV
|
Brenda Scourfield |
Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:56:42 +0000 |
34 lines |
Today's Information Law Daily
|
Ibrahim Hasan |
Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:48:13 +0000 |
43 lines |
For those interested in Facebook settings
|
chris pounder |
Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:12:28 -0000 |
29 lines |
Informatics 2011 (Rome, Italy) - 1st call extension: until 28 March 2011
|
Natalia Teixeira |
Thu, 3 Mar 2011 17:03:47 +0000 |
169 lines |
DM 2011 (Rome, Italy) - 1st call extension: until 28 March 2011
|
Natalia Teixeira |
Thu, 3 Mar 2011 17:02:29 +0000 |
135 lines |
Sharing Information from PVP Lists
|
Ibrahim Hasan |
Thu, 3 Mar 2011 13:55:12 +0000 |
44 lines |
Enquiry about speaking at CPD25 course - 31/3/2011
|
Vicky Robertson |
Thu, 3 Mar 2011 08:25:27 +0000 |
60 lines |
ICO evidence identifies data protection concerns over Freedoms Bill
|
chris pounder |
Thu, 3 Mar 2011 01:38:50 -0000 |
230 lines |
free web seminars
|
Ibrahim Hasan |
Wed, 2 Mar 2011 13:55:07 +0000 |
49 lines |
New CCTV Code
|
Ibrahim Hasan |
Wed, 2 Mar 2011 09:56:34 +0000 |
102 lines |
Re: CCTV: s.29 or PACE?
|
Bradshaw, Phillip |
Tue, 1 Mar 2011 15:01:26 -0000 |
196 lines |
CCTV: s.29 or PACE?
|
Ian Welton |
Tue, 1 Mar 2011 14:48:51 +0000 |
114 lines |
Re: [UNCLASSIFIED] [data-protection] CCTV: s.29 or PACE?
|
Bradshaw, Phillip |
Tue, 1 Mar 2011 12:47:24 -0000 |
212 lines |
Re: [UNCLASSIFIED] [data-protection] CCTV: s.29 or PACE?
|
Baines, Jonathan |
Tue, 1 Mar 2011 12:47:23 +0000 |
196 lines |
Re: [UNCLASSIFIED] [data-protection] CCTV: s.29 or PACE?
|
Harrison, Iain |
Tue, 1 Mar 2011 12:34:44 +0000 |
131 lines |
CCTV: s.29 or PACE?
|
Matt Morrison |
Tue, 1 Mar 2011 12:24:05 +0000 |
61 lines |
Re: Credit Card Fraud
|
Roland Perry |
Tue, 1 Mar 2011 12:15:36 +0000 |
58 lines |
Re: Credit Card Fraud
|
Watts, Clare (C.) |
Tue, 1 Mar 2011 09:44:21 -0000 |
190 lines |
Re: Credit Card Fraud
|
Baines, Jonathan |
Tue, 1 Mar 2011 09:42:15 +0000 |
158 lines |
Re: Credit Card Fraud
|
Ibrahim Hasan |
Tue, 1 Mar 2011 07:56:20 +0000 |
114 lines |
Re: Credit Card Fraud
|
Watts, Clare (C.) |
Tue, 1 Mar 2011 07:48:30 -0000 |
95 lines |
Credit Card Fraud
|
Ibrahim Hasan |
Tue, 1 Mar 2011 07:41:22 +0000 |
41 lines |