JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for SPM Archives


SPM Archives

SPM Archives


February 2011


View:

Show Author | Hide Author

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SPM Home

SPM Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject

From

Date Sorted by Date, Chronologically

Size

Error using ==> spm_P when calling SPM extension AAL

Sun Delin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 01:35:35 +0000

33 lines

the average effect of condition

SUBSCRIBE SPM Yihui Hung <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 03:25:19 +0000

17 lines

Re: the average effect of condition

MCLAREN, Donald <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Jan 2011 22:47:16 -0500

49 lines

Re: Error using ==> spm_P when calling SPM extension AAL

Sun Delin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 04:12:28 +0000

18 lines

Error occurred when doing dipole analysis by using SPM8

Sun Delin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 05:26:24 +0000

38 lines

MEG template

Paul Sowman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 05:35:28 +0000

22 lines

Missing condition at first level - what to input in the onset tab?

Reem Jan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 20:05:51 +1300

30 lines

MEG analysis: implicit masking and statistics

Anette Giani <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:54:13 +0100

156 lines

beta values of ROIs NOT in the statistic table

SUBSCRIBE SPM Yihui Hung <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:48:08 +0000

19 lines

Re: Missing condition at first level - what to input in the onset tab?

Cyril Pernet <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 10:19:02 +0000

67 lines

Re: Missing condition at first level - what to input in the onset tab?

Cyril Pernet <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 10:19:48 +0000

68 lines

Re: MEG template

Vladimir Litvak <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 11:47:52 +0000

62 lines

Re: MEG analysis: implicit masking and statistics

Vladimir Litvak <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 11:57:33 +0000

69 lines

Re: beta values of ROIs NOT in the statistic table

Michael T Rubens <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 04:29:47 -0800

75 lines

Re: Missing condition at first level - what to input in the onset tab?

Michael Harms <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 07:37:53 -0600

89 lines

Re: Missing condition at first level - what to input in the onset tab?

Cyril Pernet <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 13:56:22 +0000

134 lines

Re: Error occurred when doing dipole analysis by using SPM8

Gareth Barnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 14:22:02 -0000

1044 lines

2 PhD-Students in Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience - Mannheim, Germany

Kamping, Sandra <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 16:02:56 +0100

221 lines

DCM10 estimation

Maria Dauvermann <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 15:43:26 +0000

84 lines

SPECT Study - Use of Grand Mean Scaling

Sandro Shakushiya <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 18:03:23 +0000

4407 lines

Re: Missing condition at first level - what to input in the onset tab?

Michael Harms <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 12:12:55 -0600

129 lines

Re: DCM10 estimation

Klaas Enno Stephan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 19:34:08 +0000

49 lines

group comparison and rendering

Kosinski, Carrie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 16:51:13 -0500

80 lines

Re: group comparison and rendering

Gena Radulescu <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 22:50:21 +0000

67 lines

covariates in multiple regression

Sien Hu <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 18:08:18 -0500

25 lines

spm 2 installation

Dr Farooq maniyar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 23:18:36 +0000

15 lines

Re: group comparison and rendering

Michael T Rubens <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 15:09:34 -0800

101 lines

Re: covariates in multiple regression

Jonathan Peelle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 18:30:57 -0500

69 lines

Re: covariates in multiple regression

Sien Hu <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 21:33:10 -0500

48 lines

Voxel

Leanne Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 22:05:11 -0500

17 lines

Re: Missing condition at first level - what to input in the onset tab?

Reem Jan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:15:32 +1300

211 lines

Re: Voxel

MCLAREN, Donald <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 22:22:52 -0500

48 lines

Re: Missing condition at first level - what to input in the onset tab?

MCLAREN, Donald <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 22:23:45 -0500

241 lines

Re: Missing condition at first level - what to input in the onset tab?

Reem Jan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:31:03 +1300

243 lines

Re: Voxel

Michael T Rubens <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 19:40:28 -0800

142 lines

Re: Voxel

Michael T Rubens <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 19:44:24 -0800

171 lines

Comparing conditions across runs

sarika cherodath <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 10:19:07 +0530

44 lines

Bandpass filtering with wide bands in spm8: Why is there a problem?

Michael Spezio <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 23:02:31 -0800

88 lines

SPM

Ali Gholami <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 10:13:56 +0100

20 lines

Re: SPM

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 09:28:01 +0000

96 lines

unsubscribe

Javier Arbizu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 10:22:57 +0100

13 lines

Re: SPM

Ali Gholami <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 10:36:59 +0100

71 lines

Re: SPM

Reem Jan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 23:21:00 +1300

83 lines

Re: SPM

Ali Gholami <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 11:25:58 +0100

94 lines

Re: SPM

Reem Jan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 23:47:36 +1300

108 lines

Re: Bandpass filtering with wide bands in spm8: Why is there a problem?

Vladimir Litvak <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 11:18:12 +0000

86 lines

Natbrainlab Workshop

Michel Thiebaut de Schotten <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:49:43 +0100

71 lines

Re: Bandpass filtering with wide bands in spm8: Why is there a problem?

Vladimir Litvak <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:25:16 +0000

129 lines

eeg source reconstruction and temporal contrast

Gaetan Yvert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:18:53 +0000

41 lines

Re: Bandpass filtering with wide bands in spm8: Why is there a problem?

Michael Spezio <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 07:35:35 -0800

275 lines

Re: eeg source reconstruction and temporal contrast

Vladimir Litvak <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:40:53 +0000

70 lines

Re: Bandpass filtering with wide bands in spm8: Why is there a problem?

Vladimir Litvak <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:45:17 +0000

173 lines

Art Repair batch error

Shashwath Meda <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 09:54:31 -0600

77 lines

Advice regarding proper programming style

Jokel Meyer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 18:58:44 +0100

42 lines

Re: Advice regarding proper programming style

Watson, Christopher <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 13:17:39 -0500

33 lines

Re: Advice regarding proper programming style

Michael Spezio <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 10:28:27 -0800

111 lines

Re: Advice regarding proper programming style

Claus Lamm <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 19:34:04 +0100

249 lines

Re: covariates in multiple regression

Jonathan Peelle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 13:35:15 -0500

54 lines

Re: Advice regarding proper programming style

MCLAREN, Donald <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 13:34:12 -0500

53 lines

PhD Studentship in Statistics of fMRI Clinical Trials

Thomas Nichols <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 22:33:08 +0000

198 lines

SPM CLI

Ali Gholami <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 09:23:36 +0100

17 lines

Re: SPM CLI

MCLAREN, Donald <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 07:40:53 -0500

49 lines

Re: SPM CLI

Ali Gholami <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 13:58:12 +0100

38 lines

Re: SPM CLI

MCLAREN, Donald <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 08:05:14 -0500

75 lines

Re: SPM CLI

Michael Erb <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 14:25:50 +0100

95 lines

\spm8\tpm FWHM?

Chris Rorden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 14:05:51 +0000

38 lines

PhD Opportunity in the UK

Duncan Astle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 14:42:53 +0000

42 lines

Re: SPM CLI

Ali Gholami <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 17:57:33 +0100

105 lines

Re: SPM CLI

Michael Erb <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 20:28:47 +0100

128 lines

Interpreting SPM Plots

Andrew Murrin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 14:34:31 -0500

57 lines

Re: SPM CLI

Natalie Zhaoying Han <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 14:06:24 -0600

72 lines

Re: Antw: Re: [SPM] PPI interpretation questions (with attachments)

Michael Harms <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 16:00:51 -0600

114 lines

Re: Antw: Re: [SPM] PPI interpretation questions (with attachments)

Darren Gitelman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 16:23:21 -0600

297 lines

tool time course?

Emanuele Tinelli <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 23:22:27 +0000

14 lines

Normalising FDG-PET

Lucy Elizabeth Vivash <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 12:32:36 +1100

35 lines

Re: Normalising FDG-PET

Christophe Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 08:40:12 +0100

63 lines

Re: Normalising FDG-PET

Alexander Hammers <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 09:10:15 +0100

282 lines

Re: tool time course?

Rainer Bögle <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 12:07:25 +0100

48 lines

VBM8 - What to do after sample homogeneity check

Kie Woo Nam <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 11:52:04 +0000

41 lines

case study of deformations

Christoph Berger <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 12:35:35 +0000

39 lines

Re: case study of deformations

MCLAREN, Donald <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 08:46:18 -0500

76 lines

Re: SPM CLI

Stephen J. Fromm <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 13:47:06 +0000

19 lines

Re: VBM8 - What to do after sample homogeneity check

michel grothe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:05:46 +0100

126 lines

Postdoctoral position at Graz University Austria

Dr. Anja Ischebeck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 17:14:43 +0100

886 lines

wierd looking images

Karen Lythe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 17:17:28 +0000

980 lines

Re: VBM8 - What to do after sample homogeneity check

John Ashburner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 17:42:01 +0000

78 lines

Re: wierd looking images

John Ashburner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 17:55:02 +0000

66 lines

Anatomical Regions

Steffie Tomson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 12:30:06 -0600

107 lines

Re: tool time course?

Michael T Rubens <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 10:19:39 -0800

88 lines

Re: Anatomical Regions

Michael T Rubens <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 10:38:32 -0800

97 lines

DARTEL-VBM: total intracranial volume in second level analysis

Ben Becker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 20:08:51 +0000

28 lines

MEG source localizations and orthogonality

Deborah Talmi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 21:17:16 +0000

24 lines

results visualization

John Fredy <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 17:06:41 -0500

36 lines

Re: results visualization

MCLAREN, Donald <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 17:56:42 -0500

48 lines

Re: separate BOLD-functions per each single trial

maike tahden <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2011 15:03:06 +0100

222 lines

Re: DARTEL-VBM: total intracranial volume in second level analysis

Watson, Christopher <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2011 13:31:45 -0500

44 lines

Re: DARTEL-VBM: total intracranial volume in second level analysis

Steve Fleming <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2011 19:06:28 +0000

20 lines

Re: Anatomical Regions

Alexander Hammers <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2011 20:56:42 +0100

921 lines

Re: DARTEL-VBM: total intracranial volume in second level analysis

Watson, Christopher <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2011 16:41:48 -0500

31 lines

Signal change in SPM

Pilar Archila-Suerte <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2011 17:45:43 -0600

34 lines

Re: Anatomical Regions

Carlton CHU <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2011 22:51:23 -0500

240 lines

Code for saving movies made in spm eeg analyses

Michael Spezio <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2011 21:10:44 -0800

72 lines

Re: tool time course?

ematine tine <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2011 10:30:40 +0100

32 lines

Warning in spm_eeg_convert2scalp (griddata)

Panagiotis Tsiatsis <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2011 19:23:16 +0200

45 lines

Re: tool time course?

Reem Jan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2011 13:31:52 +1300

235 lines

LAB MANAGER OF FMRI LABORATORY

Jared Stokes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2011 03:13:12 +0000

32 lines

POSTDOCTORAL POSITION IN FMRI LABORATORY

Jared Stokes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2011 03:14:20 +0000

27 lines

Re: SPM CLI

han zhang <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2011 13:35:14 +0800

71 lines

Re: wierd looking images

Karen Lythe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2011 09:25:24 +0000

176 lines

Re: results visualization

John Fredy <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2011 07:41:41 -0500

110 lines

Hi, I would need the STANDALONE SPM8 for LINUX-32

Giancarlo Rossi-Fedele <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2011 12:48:45 +0000

14 lines

Random permutation test

Anders Eklund <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2011 14:15:31 +0100

72 lines

Re: DARTEL-VBM: total intracranial volume in second level analysis

MCLAREN, Donald <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2011 11:53:21 -0500

69 lines

Re: Code for saving movies made in spm eeg analyses

Vladimir Litvak <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2011 18:02:25 +0000

80 lines

Re: Warning in spm_eeg_convert2scalp (griddata)

Vladimir Litvak <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2011 18:10:08 +0000

67 lines

Re: \spm8\tpm FWHM?

John Ashburner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2011 19:17:57 +0000

60 lines

Code for saving movies made in spm eeg analyses

Carsten Stahlhut <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2011 20:15:41 +0100

218 lines

Error in "proportional Scaling" from Pet Study

Sandro Shakushiya <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2011 19:34:36 +0000

60 lines

Re: non isotropic voxels for DARTEL anatomical template?

John Ashburner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2011 20:03:35 +0000

56 lines

Using scaling

Avery Rizio <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2011 20:13:36 +0000

22 lines

A problem with SPM and FIR modeling

G. Sharvit <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2011 20:25:47 +0000

44 lines

POSTDOCTORAL POSITION - Neuroimaging and Brain Plasticity

Amir Tahmasebi <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2011 20:51:38 +0000

535 lines

VBM in large heterogeneous dataset

Lizanne Schweren <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2011 21:11:03 +0000

31 lines

Re: 'NaN' in cluster level p value

Lin Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2011 21:36:33 +0000

29 lines

Re: A problem with SPM and FIR modeling

Stephen J. Fromm <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 03:07:15 +0000

13 lines

Voxel's center

Tuomas Tolvanen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 08:29:16 +0000

19 lines

Re: VBM in large heterogeneous dataset

John Ashburner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 09:45:55 +0000

45 lines

inverse reconstruction

André Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 11:29:01 +0100

175 lines

Re: inverse reconstruction

Vladimir Litvak <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 10:36:52 +0000

86 lines

inverse reconstruction

André Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 11:38:06 +0100

176 lines

Re: Voxel's center

John Ashburner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 10:43:08 +0000

30 lines

Problem using the Fieldmaps module on GE data

Wibeke Nordhøy <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 13:12:40 +0100

46 lines

limitations of DCM (fMRI) for subcortical regions?

Helmut Laufs <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 13:14:22 +0100

75 lines

comparing men and women

Lorelei Howard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 11:53:08 -0000

43 lines

Conjunction analysis

turki sabrah <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 05:19:01 -0800

36 lines

Postdoctoral Fellowship on infant neurocognitive and brain development using MRI, Eyetracking, and EEG

Anqi Qiu <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 22:28:52 +0800

195 lines

Re: Conjunction analysis

MCLAREN, Donald <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 09:46:25 -0500

66 lines

Re: limitations of DCM (fMRI) for subcortical regions?

Watson, Christopher <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 09:46:25 -0500

44 lines

Re: comparing men and women

Watson, Christopher <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 10:08:19 -0500

56 lines

Re: Warning in spm_eeg_convert2scalp (griddata) & spm_eeg_crop

Panagiotis Tsiatsis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 16:46:05 +0200

181 lines

INCF Neuroinformatics Congress - Call for Abstracts

David Kennedy <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 11:28:50 -0500

192 lines

imcalc to do a contrast?

Soha Saleh <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 16:59:37 +0000

28 lines

Re: Problem using the Fieldmaps module on GE data

CARLES M. FALCON FALCON <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 19:20:31 +0100

70 lines

Re: Question about ROI analysis in marsbar

Matthew Brett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 10:29:21 -0800

37 lines

ROI image dimensions - Marsbar

Fred Sanders <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 13:52:48 -0500

40 lines

Re: comparing men and women

Lorelei Howard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 18:55:45 -0000

89 lines

Re: comparing men and women

Chris Watson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 14:03:34 -0500

85 lines

Re: comparing men and women

Lorelei Howard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 19:21:45 -0000

112 lines

Re: imcalc to do a contrast?

MCLAREN, Donald <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 14:57:04 -0500

70 lines

Re: ROI image dimensions - Marsbar

Matthew Brett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 16:19:41 -0800

31 lines

Re: SPM8 updates installing error in Mac

Richard Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 02:03:30 +0000

17 lines

Re: SPM8 updates installing error in Mac

Felipe Picon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 00:14:26 -0200

114 lines

Re: Non-Stationary correction in VBM 8

Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 04:44:52 +0000

19 lines

Re: SPM8 updates installing error in Mac

Richard Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 17:05:53 +1100

143 lines

Hands-On SPM8 Training 2011Feb28 and 2011Mar07 in Boston; Future (New) Programs

Robert L. Savoy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 01:10:11 -0500

343 lines

Re: imcalc to do a contrast?

Martin Jensen Dietz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 10:37:44 +0100

46 lines

Re: Question regarding the fMRI model specification

Tatiana Usnich <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 14:16:17 +0000

65 lines

Re: Question regarding the fMRI model specification

MCLAREN, Donald <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 10:20:06 -0500

54 lines

Research Assistant and Postdoctoral Fellowship Positions at VA Boston

Scott Hayes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 16:53:43 +0000

23 lines

Re: Research Assistant and Postdoctoral Fellowship Positions at VA Boston

Scott Hayes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 17:13:52 +0000

51 lines

spm_preproc

Cyril Pernet <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 17:54:43 +0000

26 lines

Re: spm_preproc

Mohamed Seghier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 18:10:44 +0000

43 lines

Vbm8

kambiz rakhshan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 11:41:10 -0800

25 lines

Re: non isotropic voxels for DARTEL anatomical template?

justine dupont <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 16:34:28 -0500

78 lines

negative beta values

Véronique Paradis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 17:37:58 -0500

82 lines

Re: Vbm8

Jonathan Peelle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 17:50:58 -0500

165 lines

Re: negative beta values

Jonathan Peelle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 22:03:53 -0500

84 lines

Re: spm_preproc

Marko Wilke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 08:43:13 +0100

69 lines

Re: spm_preproc

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 07:58:14 +0000

152 lines

Re: non isotropic voxels for DARTEL anatomical template?

John Ashburner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 09:57:38 +0000

34 lines

DCM: mutual interactions between networks

marco tettamanti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 12:07:03 +0100

52 lines

New Segmentation Out of Memory Error

Pettersson-Yeo, William <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 11:14:52 +0000

121 lines

Re: New Segmentation Out of Memory Error

John Ashburner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 11:35:59 +0000

80 lines

Re: Question regarding the fMRI model specification

Tatiana Usnich <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:52:05 +0100

68 lines

registration error under DARTEL and suggested smoothness

Meng-Chuan Lai <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 12:53:29 +0000

29 lines

PhD studentship opportunity at the University of Bath, UK (Department of Psychology)

Neal Hinvest <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:36:30 +0000

42 lines

matlab path

Cornelia Hummel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 15:36:47 +0100

54 lines

Re: New Segmentation Out of Memory Error

William Pettersson-Yeo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:05:04 +0000

23 lines

Chair Position Glasgow

Joachim Gross <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:47:53 +0000

58 lines

SPM8 VOI Extraction: Adjusting for effects of no interest

Vy Dinh <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:59:04 +0000

58 lines

Re: DCM: mutual interactions between networks

Darren Gitelman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 11:05:48 -0600

93 lines

University of Reading International Studentship

Tom Johnstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 17:29:41 +0000

56 lines

Re: registration error under DARTEL and suggested smoothness

John Ashburner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 18:12:34 +0000

63 lines

Re: matlab path

John Ashburner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 18:17:56 +0000

42 lines

SPM8 fMRI model specification

Giulia Dormal <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:27:21 -0500

176 lines

regressors of no interest in first level model

maaike rive <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:47:50 +0100

64 lines

Re: regressors of no interest in first level model

MCLAREN, Donald <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:13:51 -0500

79 lines

Re: registration error under DARTEL and suggested smoothness

Meng-Chuan Lai <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:38:43 +0000

25 lines

Re: registration error under DARTEL and suggested smoothness

John Ashburner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 20:42:47 +0000

38 lines

Question regarding FIR and contrasts

Claire (Jung Eun) Han <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:31:01 -0500

33 lines

Re: registration error under DARTEL and suggested smoothness

Meng-Chuan Lai <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:39:29 +0000

24 lines

Postdoctoral Fellowship in Cognitive Neuroscience of Memory

Zipporah Nussbaum <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 17:31:16 -0500

61 lines

Extracting ROIs in SPM8

Courtney Kastner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 22:58:01 +0000

16 lines

Standard error calculation in spm_contrasts.m - r4010

Matt Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 01:17:50 +0000

53 lines

Re: DCM: mutual interactions between networks

marco tettamanti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:00:10 +0100

67 lines

Re: registration error under DARTEL and suggested smoothness

John Ashburner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:34:07 +0000

37 lines

Re: matlab path

Marko Wilke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:30:57 +0100

85 lines

VBM ROI Marsbar query

Lena Palaniyappan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:21:51 +0000

48 lines

Re: VBM ROI Marsbar query

Jonathan Peelle <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:51:12 -0500

33 lines

Research Assistant position at Stanford University

Hoameng Ung <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:25:34 -0800

159 lines

naive quesiton about mapping between images in different space

Jiang, Zhiguo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:13:49 -0800

382 lines

Ignore my previous question

Jiang, Zhiguo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:10:54 -0800

325 lines

Modelling time derivative: valid to use t-contrasts?

Hauke Hillebrandt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 19:56:43 +0000

29 lines

Re: Modelling time derivative: valid to use t-contrasts?

Jason Steffener <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:07:58 -0500

106 lines

Why should I use SPM8 vs SPM5?

Manish Dalwani <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:03:33 -0800

28 lines

Re: Modelling time derivative: valid to use t-contrasts?

Michael T Rubens <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:33:49 -0800

160 lines

Re: Why should I use SPM8 vs SPM5?

MCLAREN, Donald <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 18:44:08 -0500

44 lines

Re: Modelling time derivative: valid to use t-contrasts?

Jonathan Peelle <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 20:52:23 -0500

156 lines

Opening positions

Xinian Zuo <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2011 11:20:32 +0800

52 lines

Re: coregistration problem

hekmatyar <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 22:57:17 -0500

23 lines

Re: 'NaN' in cluster level p value

Lin Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2011 11:54:42 +0100

86 lines

spm_api_bmc.m: typo in help comments?

Stephen J. Fromm <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2011 17:43:10 +0000

32 lines

DCM theory: def'n of exceedance prob.?

Stephen J. Fromm <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2011 17:47:13 +0000

29 lines

about ROI signal value

Yang Hu <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2011 04:27:28 +0000

38 lines

MEG data conversion

William Sohn <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2011 09:40:33 +0000

22 lines

Re: MEG data conversion

Brahim HAMADICHAREF <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2011 17:59:34 +0800

60 lines

Re: MEG data conversion

Vladimir Litvak <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2011 11:45:19 +0000

39 lines

extract ROI at the edge of the cerebellum

Viridiana Mazzola <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2011 12:00:23 +0000

44 lines

Re: DCM theory: def'n of exceedance prob.?

Klaas Enno Stephan <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2011 12:42:14 +0000

61 lines

Re: DCM theory: def'n of exceedance prob.?

Fromm, Stephen (NIH/NIMH) [C] <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2011 08:38:39 -0500

64 lines

Re: DCM theory: def'n of exceedance prob.?

Klaas Enno Stephan <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2011 14:39:21 +0000

110 lines

Re: Modelling time derivative: valid to use t-contrasts?

Jason Steffener <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2011 15:34:23 -0500

387 lines

First Official Dipy Release :-)

eleftherios garyfallidis <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2011 20:58:37 +0000

115 lines

How to do the coregistration between the functional MRI images with a high resolution anatomical head image

Linling Li <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 17:28:08 +0800

206 lines

M/EEG chantype

Martin Dietz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 09:30:45 +0000

18 lines

Re: naive quesiton about mapping between images in different space

John Ashburner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:15:52 +0000

351 lines

Re: M/EEG chantype

Vladimir Litvak <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:34:12 +0000

29 lines

Re: M/EEG chantype

Martin Jensen Dietz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 12:56:17 +0100

41 lines

Re: Question about lead field matrix

Vladimir Litvak <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 12:29:18 +0000

112 lines

Re: How to do the coregistration between the functional MRI images with a high resolution anatomical head image

John Ashburner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 12:44:58 +0000

91 lines

workshop "networks in the human brain"

workshop-networks <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:38:19 +0100

22 lines

dartel misregistration - or not?

justine dupont <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 09:44:47 -0500

951 lines

Re: dartel misregistration - or not?

MCLAREN, Donald <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 09:56:02 -0500

70 lines

Re: dartel misregistration - or not?

John Ashburner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 14:59:34 +0000

52 lines

Re: Orientation swap

Hekmatyar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 10:08:08 -0500

2983 lines

Re: Orientation swap

John Ashburner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:18:52 +0000

37 lines

Re: Question about lead field matrix

Alexandre Gramfort <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 10:11:58 -0500

54 lines

Re: about ROI signal value

MCLAREN, Donald <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:31:56 -0500

77 lines

Re: Orientation swap

Hekmatyar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:35:04 -0500

3064 lines

Re: Orientation swap

MCLAREN, Donald <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:46:32 -0500

87 lines

Putting a non-zero value for the time derivative

Claire (Jung Eun) Han <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:02:36 -0500

26 lines

Resizing mask

Steffie Tomson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 12:20:10 -0600

146 lines

Re: Resizing mask

John Ashburner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 18:37:57 +0000

33 lines

Re: Putting a non-zero value for the time derivative

MCLAREN, Donald <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:52:37 -0500

52 lines

spm_create_vol &&& spm_write_vol

cliff <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 17:16:57 -0500

29 lines

Re: spm_create_vol &&& spm_write_vol

John Ashburner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 22:32:05 +0000

30 lines

Re: extract ROI at the edge of the cerebellum

Matthew Brett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 17:20:56 -0800

44 lines

Re: EEG significant clusters outside the MIP glass brain

MP <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 20:25:30 -0500

2602 lines

Re: spm_create_vol &&& spm_write_vol

cliff <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 21:04:16 -0500

87 lines

Re: EEG significant clusters outside the MIP glass brain

Michael T Rubens <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 18:09:10 -0800

175 lines

Re: EEG significant clusters outside the MIP glass brain

MP <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 21:27:10 -0500

1323 lines

Re: EEG significant clusters outside the MIP glass brain

Michael T Rubens <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 18:39:53 -0800

254 lines

Re: EEG significant clusters outside the MIP glass brain

MP <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 21:52:53 -0500

287 lines

Re: spm_create_vol &&& spm_write_vol

John Ashburner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2011 08:43:31 +0000

59 lines

Paired t-test + Covariate

vgarcia <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2011 12:09:03 +0100

25 lines

Re: EEG significant clusters outside the MIP glass brain

Vladimir Litvak <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:20:54 +0000

141 lines

Re: Question about lead field matrix

Vladimir Litvak <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:29:30 +0000

190 lines

Lesion analysis workshop Tuebingen 27th of May 2011

B. de Haan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2011 12:59:06 +0000

23 lines

Normalization after New Segment

Joseph Whittaker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:07:20 +0000

56 lines

Re: Normalization after New Segment

John Ashburner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:42:35 +0000

49 lines

Re: Paired t-test + Covariate

vgarcia <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:42:06 +0100

436 lines

Re: Paired t-test + Covariate

MCLAREN, Donald <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:55:03 -0500

488 lines

fMRI-EEG Post-Doc Open Position

Jose Soares <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2011 08:36:13 -0800

33 lines

AR(1)

Jiang, Zhiguo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2011 09:03:39 -0800

415 lines

Re: New Segmentation Out of Memory Error

Richard Binney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2011 17:29:28 +0000

103 lines

Re: New Segmentation Out of Memory Error

John Ashburner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2011 17:42:49 +0000

71 lines

Re: Question regarding FIR and contrasts

Jonathan Peelle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2011 17:36:09 -0500

126 lines

Fwd: Urge your Representative to Oppose Science Funding Cuts

Michael T Rubens <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2011 18:58:35 -0800

166 lines

Re: Warning in spm_eeg_convert2scalp (griddata) & spm_eeg_crop

Vladimir Litvak <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:57:13 +0000

245 lines

Re: New Segmentation Out of Memory Error

Richard Binney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 15:39:18 +0000

159 lines

Re: New Segmentation Out of Memory Error

Richard Binney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 15:44:35 +0000

188 lines

Re: New Segmentation Out of Memory Error

John Ashburner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 15:58:16 +0000

135 lines

Re: New Segmentation Out of Memory Error

michel grothe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 17:48:33 +0100

292 lines

Fwd: [SPM] New Segmentation Out of Memory Error

Richard Binney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 17:10:35 +0000

342 lines

Re: New Segmentation Out of Memory Error

Richard Binney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 17:15:28 +0000

380 lines

Re: New Segmentation Out of Memory Error

John Ashburner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 17:16:00 +0000

177 lines

Postdoctoral position in neuroimaging applications in translational and clinical research

Prabhakaran Vivek <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:24:12 -0600

56 lines

T1 & functional image reorigin

cliff <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:51:45 -0500

40 lines

Re: New Segmentation Out of Memory Error

michel grothe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 20:45:14 +0100

406 lines

Re: T1 & functional image reorigin

John Ashburner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 19:47:46 +0000

38 lines

SPM-Workshop Hannover (Germany)

SPM-Workshop Hannover <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 22:59:07 +0100

78 lines

DARTEL template in MNI space

kambiz rakhshan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:34:00 -0800

53 lines

VOI Batch Module

James Bursley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 20:02:00 -0500

35 lines

Re: VOI Batch Module

James Bursley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 02:21:17 +0000

18 lines

multiple conditions/regressors in SPM8 batch

Toni Pitcher <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 02:41:30 +0000

57 lines

Research Assistant Position in Cambridge

Rik Henson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 09:32:54 +0000

171 lines

Re: multiple conditions/regressors in SPM8 batch

Michael Erb <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:49:09 +0100

69 lines

Re: DARTEL template in MNI space

John Ashburner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:11:05 +0000

83 lines

Re: methodological question

Vladimir Litvak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:54:19 +0000

59 lines

Creating an "average" structural image

Nick Davis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 15:02:45 +0000

55 lines

Re: Creating an "average" structural image

Michael O'Sullivan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 15:19:16 +0000

177 lines

Re: Creating an "average" structural image

John Ashburner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 15:43:36 +0000

66 lines

Re: Creating an "average" structural image

claus lamm <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:56:40 +0100

27 lines

Re: New Segmentation Out of Memory Error

John Ashburner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:33:07 +0000

249 lines

PhD Student and Postdoctoral Researcher Positions in Neuroimaging, Donders Institute, Nijmegen

Christian Doeller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 17:55:36 +0100

428 lines

Re: VOI Batch Module

Vy Dinh <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:49:21 +0000

44 lines

help with spm_snbasis code

Siddharth Srivastava <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:28:46 -0800

39 lines

Re: help with spm_snbasis code

John Ashburner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 20:08:30 +0000

43 lines

How to display mutltiple spm results for one subject with multiple t-contrasts with batch editor?

Jake Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 15:38:34 -0500

50 lines

sensitivity of DARTEL

Saemann Philipp <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 00:10:35 +0100

44 lines

SVC correction

Lisa Pan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 18:53:01 -0500

40 lines

VBM results question

Anup Bidesi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 00:09:00 +0000

5715 lines

Re: sensitivity of DARTEL

John Ashburner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 00:10:48 +0000

70 lines

Re: help with spm_snbasis code

Siddharth Srivastava <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 17:05:35 -0800

115 lines

Re: sensitivity of DARTEL

michel grothe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 02:45:09 +0100

171 lines

Asking "interaction analysis" in spm !! :D

HwangArum <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:59:22 +0900

78 lines

Re: Asking "interaction analysis" in spm !! :D

MCLAREN, Donald <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 21:25:03 -0500

58 lines

HELP!with VBM (estimation error)

chihiro <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 02:18:46 +0000

77 lines

Re: HELP!with VBM (estimation error)

MCLAREN, Donald <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 21:53:22 -0500

117 lines

vbm8 for single subject

John Fredy <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 22:10:06 -0500

25 lines

MATLAB Out of Memory error

Nero Evero <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 03:32:16 +0000

40 lines

Re: vbm8 for single subject

Jonathan Peelle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 23:46:29 -0500

37 lines

TIV as nuisance factor for unmodulated data in a VBM-analysis

Lucas Eggert <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:44:01 +0100

338 lines

is possible to register to another image than first one in realignment

Cesar Caballero <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:04:06 +0100

19 lines

Re: is possible to register to another image than first one in realignment

John Ashburner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:21:44 +0000

28 lines

Re: is possible to register to another image than first one in realignment

Cesar Caballero <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:48:50 +0100

40 lines

Re: is possible to register to another image than first one in realignment

John Ashburner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:51:34 +0000

51 lines

CURSO DE NEUROIMAGEN AVANZADA

jmrabanal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 13:00:17 +0100

110 lines

Re: vbm8 for single subject

John Fredy <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 07:15:33 -0500

92 lines

SPM error

<Holly> <Rossiter> <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:15:01 +0000

48 lines

Re: SPM error

Vladimir Litvak <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:30:02 +0000

60 lines

Announcement: The 2011 FSL & FreeSurfer Course

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 13:51:47 +0000

107 lines

DCM and global signal

Fred Sanders <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:03:32 -0500

42 lines

Interpret pediatric fMRI

Ghazal Mohades <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 14:56:05 +0000

31 lines

how to save realignment output

Deepika Nandiraju <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:01:07 -0500

40 lines

Re: how to save realignment output

Marko Wilke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:14:49 +0100

87 lines

mis-registration of subject's anatomical and functional images

Xin Di <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:24:56 -0500

1066 lines

International School of Clinical Neuroanatomy on the Frontal Lobes.

Michel Thiebaut de Schotten <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:39:19 +0100

52 lines

Re: Interpret pediatric fMRI

Marko Wilke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:57:24 +0100

84 lines

Re: mis-registration of subject's anatomical and functional images

John Ashburner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:00:12 +0000

39 lines

Re: mis-registration of subject's anatomical and functional images

Xin Di <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:25:23 -0500

125 lines

Parametric or categorical design

Javier Navas <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:26:09 +0100

53 lines

Re: Parametric or categorical design

MCLAREN, Donald <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:51:27 -0500

75 lines

Neuroimaging Data Processing Workshop 23-24 March 2011, Edinburgh, UK

Chris Filo Gorgolewski <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:58:01 +0000

31 lines

Job Ad: Postdoctoral and PhD positions in decision-making SNS lab, University of Zurich

Todd Hare <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:29:02 +0000

39 lines

Re: MATLAB Out of Memory error

Dennis Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:44:21 -0800

111 lines

acceptable high pass filtering

Richard Binney <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2011 13:38:33 +0000

85 lines

Re: DCM and global signal

Klaas Enno Stephan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2011 17:43:29 +0000

76 lines

SPM to Fieldtrip for ICA

Jerome Courtemanche <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Feb 2011 02:10:46 +0000

30 lines

SPM EEG Pre processing: Not sure if everything looks OK

MP <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2011 22:50:38 -0500

3814 lines

Conjunction analysis bug in SPM8 ?

Steven Liu <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Feb 2011 08:49:56 -0500

25 lines

medial temporal lobe roi mask

John Fredy <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Feb 2011 14:26:49 -0500

37 lines

Check Reg Figures SPM8 - size and arrangement

Vladimir Bogdanov <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Feb 2011 14:20:37 -0800

5059 lines

Re: SPM EEG Pre processing: Not sure if everything looks OK

Vladimir Litvak <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Feb 2011 22:27:16 +0000

52 lines

Re: medial temporal lobe roi mask

Michael T Rubens <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Feb 2011 15:53:22 -0800

70 lines

Reporting stats

Anna McCarrey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 00:22:19 +0000

29 lines

Re: medial temporal lobe roi mask

G Elliott Wimmer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 03:35:30 +0000

32 lines

Re: SPM to Fieldtrip for ICA

Vladimir Litvak <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 11:02:28 +0000

45 lines

Realignment parameters

Poornima Kumar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 11:29:52 +0000

27 lines

Re: medial temporal lobe roi mask

John Fredy <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 07:50:09 -0500

90 lines

SPM functions for BMS

Joseph Whittaker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 13:16:01 +0000

51 lines

Re: Realignment parameters

Marko Wilke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 14:16:56 +0100

66 lines

PostDoctoral Job Announcement - University of Wisconsin-Madison

Veena A. Nair <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 16:07:40 +0000

92 lines

ArtRepair and Realign-Unwarp

Molly Crockett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 16:27:39 +0000

26 lines

Re: Realignment parameters

MCLAREN, Donald <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 11:39:14 -0500

118 lines

Re: Reporting stats

MCLAREN, Donald <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 11:47:22 -0500

76 lines

Re: Anatomical Regions

Alexander Hammers <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 18:22:01 +0100

599 lines

Re: medial temporal lobe roi mask

Alexander Hammers <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 18:26:07 +0100

451 lines

Re: medial temporal lobe roi mask

G Elliott Wimmer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 19:28:23 +0000

30 lines

Research Assistant and Postdoctoral Fellowship Positions

Andrea Cherubini <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 21:29:36 +0100

98 lines

Re: TIV as nuisance factor for unmodulated data in a VBM-analysis

Jonathan Peelle <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 16:40:59 -0500

80 lines

Research Specialist Position - University of Wisconsin, Madison

Erik Kastman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 18:06:31 -0600

91 lines

bandpass filter in REST toolbox

tony han <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:46:58 +0000

91 lines

acceptable high pass filtering

Richard Binney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:48:38 +0000

76 lines

Re: bandpass filter in REST toolbox

YAN Chao-Gan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 19:54:22 +0800

117 lines

Re: Check Reg Figures SPM8 - size and arrangement

John Ashburner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:39:31 +0000

45 lines

Re: Check Reg Figures SPM8 - size and arrangement

Vladimir Bogdanov <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 06:58:14 -0800

34 lines

Re: Check Reg Figures SPM8 - size and arrangement

John Ashburner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 15:08:49 +0000

86 lines

Regarding scanner sequences

Jonas Persson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:16:14 +0000

35 lines

Re: Regarding scanner sequences

John Ashburner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:39:32 +0000

43 lines

SPM8 batchscripts?

Manish Dalwani <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:24:50 -0800

25 lines

modelling assumed & unassumed hrf together

Pamela LaMontagne <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:56:23 -0600

48 lines

Re: SPM EEG Pre processing: Not sure if everything looks OK

Kuo Bo-Cheng <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 04:16:00 +0800

67 lines

Re: SPM EEG Pre processing: Not sure if everything looks OK

Vladimir Litvak <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 21:05:13 +0000

76 lines