JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


February 2011


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"Legitimate Interests" condition (3 messages)
"Legitimate Interests" condition [UNCLASSIFIED] (2 messages)
A 21st century definition of privacy. (3 messages)
Activity logs (2 messages)
An exceptional case! (2 messages)
Another Fine (8 messages)
Anyone got a procedure for handling e-mails in response to a SAR? (3 messages)
Aspects of Compliance ~ 25th May 2011 ~ SWICg Annual Seminar (1 message)
Authority to reduce the fine (1 message)
Changes to RIPSA (1 message)
Child safety vetting scheme 'to be scrapped - reports BBC (1 message)
Child workers' checks to be cut (1 message)
Council of Europe: Consultation on the modernisation of Convention 108 (1 message)
Council surveillance and magistrate approval (1 message)
council survey (1 message)
Data Controller ? (1 message)
DM 2011 (Rome, Italy) - CFP new date: 28 February 2011 (1 message)
DP/FOI Request? (3 messages)
draft code (1 message)
Elearning DPA Software (1 message)
Farewell from Tim Turner (1 message)
first time dealing with an SAR from a child (Any advice or guidance on handling this issue) (1 message)
forms (1 message)
forthcoming meeting on openness versus data protection (1 message)
Freedom Bill (15 messages)
Freedom Bill - CCTV Proposals (1 message)
Freedom Bill - New CCTV Code (1 message)
Freedom Bill [UNCLASSIFIED] (1 message)
Friday question: consent form with Organisation A giving Council permission to update address changes with Organisation A. (4 messages)
FW: General enquiry RIPSA (2 messages)
FW: Hawktalk: European Commission explains why UK's Data Protection Act is deficient (1 message)
FW: [data-protection] Releasing information about students to their own government (1 message)
G8 Privacy/Data Protection? (1 message)
GCSx and CRB (6 messages)
GeneWatch Freedoms Bill briefing on DNA proposals in the Freedoms Bill (1 message)
Gwent police in huge breach (5 messages)
Hawktalk: How the Information Commissioner would improve Data Protection law (1 message)
Hawktalk: Ignored notification requirements cast doubt about Sensitive Personal Data (1 message)
Hawktalk: Protection of Freedoms Bill promotes efficient CCTV/ANPR surveillance not effective privacy (1 message)
Hawktalk: Why the PNR Directive is disproportionate and does not protect privacy (1 message)
Health and Social Care Bill (1 message)
Informatics 2011 (Rome, Italy) - CFP new date: 28 February 2011 (1 message)
IRMS CONFERENCE - TRAINING MASTERCLASS (1 message)
Is an independent standards committee a data controller? (5 messages)
Job Descriptions (5 messages)
Library fines (4 messages)
Measures of privacy (1 message)
Microsoft Live@edu (1 message)
Microsoft Windows Flaw (2 messages)
Minutes of meetings (5 messages)
Mobile phone Footage (9 messages)
New Articles (1 message)
new school powers (11 messages)
Online Training (1 message)
PNR Directive analysis link (1 message)
Privacy International Article (2 messages)
Probably of interest to privacy scholars. (1 message)
Protection of Freedom Bill (1 message)
PVP List info (1 message)
Releasing information about students to their own government (8 messages)
Schedule One Offenders (1 message)
schools to be banned from Fingerprinting Kids (2 messages)
Sensitive data processing condition - 2 (f) - equal opportunity monitoring (6 messages)
Strategy Minutes (3 messages)
Strathclyde Police lose child abuse intervi ew tapes (2 messages)
Strathclyde Police lose child abuse interview tapes (3 messages)
Telephone call logging data (1 message)
Two more fines are imminent says ICO (2 messages)
Vexatious requests/people (8 messages)
Violence Warning Markers Guidance (1 message)
When is employee information personal information (Is it a continuum or a clear dividing line?) (6 messages)
WikiLeaks in Local Government? (1 message)
Youth Offending Teams (4 messages)
[UNCLASSIFIED] [data-protection] Friday que stion: consent form with Organisation A giving Council permission to upda te address changes with Organisation A. (1 message)
[UNCLASSIFIED] [data-protection] Friday question: consent form with Organisation A giving Council permission to update address changes with Organisation A. (1 message)
[UNCLASSIFIED] [data-protection] Strategy Minutes (1 message)
[UNCLASSIFIED] [data-protection] When is employee information personal information (Is it a continuum or a clear dividing line?) (1 message)
[UNCLASSIFIED] [data-protection] WikiLeaks in Local Government? (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"Legitimate Interests" condition

"Legitimate Interests" condition

Michelle Peel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 14:02:58 +0000

65 lines

Re: "Legitimate Interests" condition

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 14:10:37 -0000

149 lines

Re: "Legitimate Interests" condition

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 14:27:03 -0000

148 lines

New Thread

"Legitimate Interests" condition [UNCLASSIFIED]

Re: "Legitimate Interests" condition [UNCLASSIFIED]

Healy, Susan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 14:13:34 +0000

135 lines

Re: "Legitimate Interests" condition [UNCLASSIFIED]

Michelle Peel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 14:30:15 +0000

46 lines

New Thread

A 21st century definition of privacy.

A 21st century definition of privacy.

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2011 19:28:03 +0000

63 lines

Re: A 21st century definition of privacy.

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2011 20:22:04 -0000

129 lines

Re: A 21st century definition of privacy.

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2011 11:10:53 +0000

207 lines

New Thread

Activity logs

Activity logs

Claire Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 14:52:51 +0000

46 lines

Re: Activity logs

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:05:55 +0000

115 lines

New Thread

An exceptional case!

An exceptional case!

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 09:50:57 +0000

31 lines

Re: An exceptional case!

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 11:07:18 +0000

101 lines

New Thread

Another Fine

Another Fine

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 10:21:42 +0000

166 lines

Re: Another Fine

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 12:07:51 +0000

215 lines

Re: Another Fine

Kevin Tarleton (0161 923 6305) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 16:53:38 -0000

626 lines

Re: Another Fine

Chris Spray <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 19:46:22 -0000

829 lines

Re: Another Fine

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 21:00:51 +0000

823 lines

Re: Another Fine

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 21:20:16 +0000

66 lines

Re: Another Fine

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 21:27:20 -0000

126 lines

Re: Another Fine

Chris Spray <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 21:42:33 -0000

850 lines

New Thread

Anyone got a procedure for handling e-mails in response to a SAR?

Anyone got a procedure for handling e-mails in response to a SAR?

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:23:57 -0000

37 lines

Re: Anyone got a procedure for handling e-mails in response to a SAR?

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:31:04 -0000

122 lines

Re: Anyone got a procedure for handling e-mails in response to a SAR?

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:34:44 -0000

184 lines

New Thread

Aspects of Compliance ~ 25th May 2011 ~ SWICg Annual Seminar

Aspects of Compliance ~ 25th May 2011 ~ SWICg Annual Seminar

Tom Bown <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:20:32 +0000

49 lines

New Thread

Authority to reduce the fine

Authority to reduce the fine

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 00:24:29 -0000

262 lines

New Thread

Changes to RIPSA

Changes to RIPSA

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 10:33:11 +0000

46 lines

New Thread

Child safety vetting scheme 'to be scrapped - reports BBC

Child safety vetting scheme 'to be scrapped - reports BBC

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2011 13:37:57 -0000

168 lines

New Thread

Child workers' checks to be cut

Child workers' checks to be cut

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:20:50 +0000

93 lines

New Thread

Council of Europe: Consultation on the modernisation of Convention 108

Council of Europe: Consultation on the modernisation of Convention 108

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2011 00:11:12 -0000

516 lines

New Thread

Council surveillance and magistrate approval

Council surveillance and magistrate approval

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 11:27:27 +0000

45 lines

New Thread

council survey

council survey

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 16:50:36 +0000

103 lines

New Thread

Data Controller ?

Data Controller ?

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:45:17 +0000

39 lines

New Thread

DM 2011 (Rome, Italy) - CFP new date: 28 February 2011

DM 2011 (Rome, Italy) - CFP new date: 28 February 2011

Natalia Teixeira <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 17:32:42 +0000

133 lines

New Thread

DP/FOI Request?

DP/FOI Request?

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 14:02:47 -0000

55 lines

Re: DP/FOI Request?

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 14:28:26 +0000

106 lines

Re: DP/FOI Request?

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:33:46 +0000

84 lines

New Thread

draft code

draft code

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2011 14:28:40 +0000

114 lines

New Thread

Elearning DPA Software

Elearning DPA Software

Davies, Sarah <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 16:00:39 -0000

231 lines

New Thread

Farewell from Tim Turner

Farewell from Tim Turner

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2011 14:39:06 -0000

187 lines

New Thread

first time dealing with an SAR from a child (Any advice or guidance on handling this issue)

first time dealing with an SAR from a child (Any advice or guidance on handling this issue)

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:29:56 +0000

88 lines

New Thread

forms

forms

Richard Rankin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2011 08:49:10 +0000

40 lines

New Thread

forthcoming meeting on openness versus data protection

forthcoming meeting on openness versus data protection

CHARLES OPPENHEIM <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2011 10:59:58 +0000

154 lines

New Thread

Freedom Bill

Freedom Bill

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 07:44:33 +0000

49 lines

Re: Freedom Bill

Alan Stead <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 09:36:01 +0000

87 lines

Re: Freedom Bill

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 09:44:57 +0000

127 lines

Freedom Bill

David Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:50:17 +0000

49 lines

Re: Freedom Bill

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:57:16 -0000

128 lines

Re: Freedom Bill

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:00:29 -0000

77 lines

Re: Freedom Bill

Bownes David (CEX) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:21:36 +0000

125 lines

Re: Freedom Bill

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:24:08 -0000

153 lines

Freedom Bill

David Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:32:35 +0000

52 lines

Re: Freedom Bill

Giles, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:45:08 -0000

557 lines

Re: Freedom Bill

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:48:30 -0500

713 lines

Re: Freedom Bill

Samuel Price <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:52:36 -0000

694 lines

Re: Freedom Bill

Simon Macauley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:40:17 +0000

319 lines

Re: Freedom Bill

Simon Macaulay <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:14:18 +0000

30 lines

Re: Freedom Bill

Ben Plouviez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 12:10:51 -0000

100 lines

New Thread

Freedom Bill - CCTV Proposals

Freedom Bill - CCTV Proposals

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:54:07 +0000

93 lines

New Thread

Freedom Bill - New CCTV Code

Freedom Bill - New CCTV Code

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:03:52 +0000

47 lines

New Thread

Freedom Bill [UNCLASSIFIED]

Re: Freedom Bill [UNCLASSIFIED]

Healy, Susan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:35:24 +0000

74 lines

New Thread

Friday question: consent form with Organisation A giving Council permission to update address changes with Organisation A.

Friday question: consent form with Organisation A giving Council permission to update address changes with Organisation A.

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 17:18:18 +0000

259 lines

Re: Friday question: consent form with Organisation A giving Council permission to update address changes with Organisation A.

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 18:04:11 -0000

675 lines

Re: Friday question: consent form with Organisation A giving Council permission to update address changes with Organisation A.

Alan Stead <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 09:45:41 +0000

139 lines

Re: Friday question: consent form with Organisation A giving Council permission to update address changes with Organisation A.

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:01:28 +0000

487 lines

New Thread

FW: General enquiry RIPSA

FW: General enquiry RIPSA

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 10:55:40 +0000

812 lines

FW: General enquiry RIPSA

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:13:43 +0000

811 lines

New Thread

FW: Hawktalk: European Commission explains why UK's Data Protection Act is deficient

FW: Hawktalk: European Commission explains why UK's Data Protection Act is deficient

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 01:08:52 -0000

218 lines

New Thread

FW: [data-protection] Releasing information about students to their own government

FW: [data-protection] Releasing information about students to their own government

Bob Vesey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:55:57 -0000

888 lines

New Thread

G8 Privacy/Data Protection?

G8 Privacy/Data Protection?

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 15:24:45 +0000

34 lines

New Thread

GCSx and CRB

GCSx and CRB

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:24:45 +0000

178 lines

Re: GCSx and CRB

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 14:58:40 +0000

260 lines

Re: GCSx and CRB

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:05:05 -0000

151 lines

Re: GCSx and CRB

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 10:16:19 -0500

87 lines

Re: GCSx and CRB

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:57:38 -0000

543 lines

Re: GCSx and CRB

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:13:07 +0000

631 lines

New Thread

GeneWatch Freedoms Bill briefing on DNA proposals in the Freedoms Bill

GeneWatch Freedoms Bill briefing on DNA proposals in the Freedoms Bill

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2011 15:39:28 -0000

140 lines

New Thread

Gwent police in huge breach

Gwent police in huge breach

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:18:33 +0000

190 lines

Re: Gwent police in huge breach

Piers Margetts <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:26:20 -0000

822 lines

Re: Gwent police in huge breach

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:28:17 +0000

727 lines

Re: Gwent police in huge breach

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:39:01 -0000

476 lines

Re: Gwent police in huge breach

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 12:51:37 +0000

39 lines

New Thread

Hawktalk: How the Information Commissioner would improve Data Protection law

Hawktalk: How the Information Commissioner would improve Data Protection law

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 01:38:19 -0000

176 lines

New Thread

Hawktalk: Ignored notification requirements cast doubt about Sensitive Personal Data

Hawktalk: Ignored notification requirements cast doubt about Sensitive Personal Data

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:23:07 -0000

208 lines

New Thread

Hawktalk: Protection of Freedoms Bill promotes efficient CCTV/ANPR surveillance not effective privacy

Hawktalk: Protection of Freedoms Bill promotes efficient CCTV/ANPR surveillance not effective privacy

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:47:59 -0000

262 lines

New Thread

Hawktalk: Why the PNR Directive is disproportionate and does not protect privacy

Hawktalk: Why the PNR Directive is disproportionate and does not protect privacy

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 11:36:53 -0000

200 lines

New Thread

Health and Social Care Bill

Health and Social Care Bill

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2011 09:02:35 +0000

101 lines

New Thread

Informatics 2011 (Rome, Italy) - CFP new date: 28 February 2011

Informatics 2011 (Rome, Italy) - CFP new date: 28 February 2011

Natalia Teixeira <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 17:33:52 +0000

168 lines

New Thread

IRMS CONFERENCE - TRAINING MASTERCLASS

IRMS CONFERENCE - TRAINING MASTERCLASS

Matthew Stephenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 14:48:32 +0000

245 lines

New Thread

Is an independent standards committee a data controller?

Re: Is an independent standards committee a data controller?

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 18:18:01 +0000

32 lines

Re: Is an independent standards committee a data controller?

Ben Plouviez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 18:24:49 -0000

241 lines

Re: Is an independent standards committee a data controller?

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 18:43:32 -0000

408 lines

Re: Is an independent standards committee a data controller?

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 19:05:34 -0000

433 lines

Re: Is an independent standards committee a data controller?

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 04:44:45 -0500

255 lines

New Thread

Job Descriptions

Job Descriptions

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 13:38:09 +0000

36 lines

Re: Job Descriptions

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 14:56:14 -0000

524 lines

Re: Job Descriptions

Paula Tighe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 15:38:39 -0000

108 lines

Re: Job Descriptions

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 16:38:32 -0000

179 lines

Re: Job Descriptions

Paula Tighe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 08:30:02 -0000

704 lines

New Thread

Library fines

Library fines

Sarah White <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 15:34:53 +0000

39 lines

Re: Library fines

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 15:56:25 -0000

75 lines

Re: Library fines

Ray Cooke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 16:49:32 +0000

196 lines

Re: Library fines

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 17:29:00 -0000

483 lines

New Thread

Measures of privacy

Measures of privacy

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 12:38:31 +0000

42 lines

New Thread

Microsoft Live@edu

Microsoft Live@edu

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 09:51:15 -0000

79 lines

New Thread

Microsoft Windows Flaw

Microsoft Windows Flaw

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 08:09:09 +0000

96 lines

Re: Microsoft Windows Flaw

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 14:12:27 +0000

46 lines

New Thread

Minutes of meetings

Minutes of meetings

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 16:13:42 +0000

33 lines

Re: Minutes of meetings

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 16:40:05 -0000

107 lines

Re: Minutes of meetings

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 08:38:53 -0000

182 lines

Re: Minutes of meetings

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 08:46:44 -0000

239 lines

Re: Minutes of meetings

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 09:33:23 +0000

252 lines

New Thread

Mobile phone Footage

Mobile phone Footage

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 11:30:06 -0000

55 lines

Re: Mobile phone Footage

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:43:54 +0000

130 lines

Re: Mobile phone Footage

Andrew Cormack <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:44:19 +0000

164 lines

Re: Mobile phone Footage

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 15:19:08 +0000

199 lines

Re: Mobile phone Footage

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 15:18:16 -0000

251 lines

Re: Mobile phone Footage

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 15:22:35 -0000

301 lines

Re: Mobile phone Footage

Chris Spray <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 18:05:17 -0000

789 lines

Re: Mobile phone Footage

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 18:23:32 -0000

286 lines

Re: Mobile phone Footage

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 20:23:10 +0000

83 lines

New Thread

New Articles

New Articles

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2011 13:47:15 +0000

43 lines

New Thread

new school powers

new school powers

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 13:49:10 +0000

43 lines

Re: new school powers

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 14:22:55 -0000

91 lines

Re: new school powers

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 14:36:07 +0000

168 lines

Re: new school powers

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 15:05:12 -0000

129 lines

Re: new school powers

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 15:19:23 -0000

166 lines

Re: new school powers

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 15:42:03 -0000

242 lines

Re: new school powers

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:01:05 +0000

241 lines

Re: new school powers

Dunster, Jon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:30:59 -0000

71 lines

Re: new school powers

Dunster, Jon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:33:09 -0000

102 lines

Re: new school powers

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:46:22 +0000

45 lines

Re: new school powers

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 18:31:51 +0000

104 lines

New Thread

Online Training

Online Training

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 12:11:13 +0000

53 lines

New Thread

PNR Directive analysis link

PNR Directive analysis link

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 11:22:59 +0000

110 lines

New Thread

Privacy International Article

Privacy International Article

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 08:14:13 +0000

92 lines

Re: Privacy International Article

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 09:33:50 -0000

393 lines

New Thread

Probably of interest to privacy scholars.

Probably of interest to privacy scholars.

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 15:26:09 +0000

30 lines

New Thread

Protection of Freedom Bill

Protection of Freedom Bill

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2011 14:29:00 +0000

128 lines

New Thread

PVP List info

PVP List info

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 09:39:02 +0000

46 lines

New Thread

Releasing information about students to their own government

Releasing information about students to their own government

Stock, Sara <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:29:40 +0000

228 lines

Re: Releasing information about students to their own government

Ray Cooke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:47:26 +0000

337 lines

Re: Releasing information about students to their own government

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 09:05:05 -0500

583 lines

Re: Releasing information about students to their own government

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:54:18 -0000

806 lines

Re: Releasing information about students to their own government

Maurice Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 18:30:00 +0000

337 lines

Re: Releasing information about students to their own government

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:31:52 +0000

367 lines

Re: Releasing information about students to their own government

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:28:49 +0000

593 lines

Re: Releasing information about students to their own government

Sarah Wickham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:36:27 +0000

682 lines

New Thread

Schedule One Offenders

Schedule One Offenders

Katie Robey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 14:09:47 +0000

52 lines

New Thread

schools to be banned from Fingerprinting Kids

schools to be banned from Fingerprinting Kids

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:31:36 +0000

40 lines

Re: schools to be banned from Fingerprinting Kids

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:55:31 -0000

119 lines

New Thread

Sensitive data processing condition - 2 (f) - equal opportunity monitoring

Sensitive data processing condition - 2 (f) - equal opportunity monitoring

Ray Cooke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2011 11:06:25 +0000

118 lines

Re: Sensitive data processing condition - 2 (f) - equal opportunity monitoring

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Feb 2011 11:50:06 -0000

322 lines

Re: Sensitive data processing condition - 2 (f) - equal opportunity monitoring

Ray Cooke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2011 09:04:48 +0000

393 lines

Re: Sensitive data processing condition - 2 (f) - equal opportunity monitoring

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2011 09:14:53 -0000

686 lines

Re: Sensitive data processing condition - 2 (f) - equal opportunity monitoring

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2011 09:25:25 -0000

813 lines

Re: Sensitive data processing condition - 2 (f) - equal opportunity monitoring

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2011 10:08:49 -0000

234 lines

New Thread

Strategy Minutes

Strategy Minutes

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:30:15 +0000

31 lines

Strategy Minutes

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:06:37 +0000

178 lines

Re: Strategy Minutes

Michelle Peel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2011 10:35:36 +0000

45 lines

New Thread

Strathclyde Police lose child abuse intervi ew tapes

Re: Strathclyde Police lose child abuse intervi ew tapes

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:50:20 -0000

535 lines

Re: Strathclyde Police lose child abuse intervi ew tapes

CHARLES OPPENHEIM <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:54:06 +0000

439 lines

New Thread

Strathclyde Police lose child abuse interview tapes

Strathclyde Police lose child abuse interview tapes

Giles, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:19:37 -0000

253 lines

Re: Strathclyde Police lose child abuse interview tapes

CHARLES OPPENHEIM <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:35:19 +0000

228 lines

Re: Strathclyde Police lose child abuse interview tapes

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:32:29 -0500

638 lines

New Thread

Telephone call logging data

Telephone call logging data

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 11:52:25 +0000

63 lines

New Thread

Two more fines are imminent says ICO

Two more fines are imminent says ICO

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:55:18 +0000

204 lines

Re: Two more fines are imminent says ICO

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 17:16:24 -0000

469 lines

New Thread

Vexatious requests/people

Vexatious requests/people

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 08:08:22 +0000

37 lines

Re: Vexatious requests/people

Giles, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 08:40:45 -0000

554 lines

Re: Vexatious requests/people

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:07:50 -0000

87 lines

Re: Vexatious requests/people

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:49:00 -0000

120 lines

Re: Vexatious requests/people

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:52:06 -0000

178 lines

Re: Vexatious requests/people

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:38:40 +0000

184 lines

Re: Vexatious requests/people

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:59:14 +0000

267 lines

Re: Vexatious requests/people

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:11:45 -0000

80 lines

New Thread

Violence Warning Markers Guidance

Violence Warning Markers Guidance

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:40:47 +0000

215 lines

New Thread

When is employee information personal information (Is it a continuum or a clear dividing line?)

When is employee information personal information (Is it a continuum or a clear dividing line?)

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:44:06 +0000

99 lines

Re: When is employee information personal information (Is it a continuum or a clear dividing line?)

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:07:54 -0000

164 lines

Re: When is employee information personal information (Is it a continuum or a clear dividing line?)

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:47:19 -0000

151 lines

Re: When is employee information personal information (Is it a continuum or a clear dividing line?)

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:49:46 -0000

192 lines

Re: When is employee information personal information (Is it a continuum or a clear dividing line?)

Samuel Price <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 15:08:19 -0000

257 lines

Re: When is employee information personal information (Is it a continuum or a clear dividing line?)

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 15:58:05 +0000

63 lines

New Thread

WikiLeaks in Local Government?

WikiLeaks in Local Government?

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2011 09:33:28 +0000

46 lines

New Thread

Youth Offending Teams

Youth Offending Teams

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 18:38:53 +0000

44 lines

Re: Youth Offending Teams

Michelle Peel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 08:51:18 +0000

55 lines

Re: Youth Offending Teams

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 09:17:04 -0000

156 lines

Re: Youth Offending Teams

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 10:35:01 -0000

198 lines

New Thread

[UNCLASSIFIED] [data-protection] Friday que stion: consent form with Organisation A giving Council permission to upda te address changes with Organisation A.

Re: [UNCLASSIFIED] [data-protection] Friday que stion: consent form with Organisation A giving Council permission to upda te address changes with Organisation A.

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:18:39 -0000

836 lines

New Thread

[UNCLASSIFIED] [data-protection] Friday question: consent form with Organisation A giving Council permission to update address changes with Organisation A.

Re: [UNCLASSIFIED] [data-protection] Friday question: consent form with Organisation A giving Council permission to update address changes with Organisation A.

Harrison, Iain <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:11:45 +0000

671 lines

New Thread

[UNCLASSIFIED] [data-protection] Strategy Minutes

Re: [UNCLASSIFIED] [data-protection] Strategy Minutes

Harrison, Iain <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:29:13 +0000

100 lines

New Thread

[UNCLASSIFIED] [data-protection] When is employee information personal information (Is it a continuum or a clear dividing line?)

Re: [UNCLASSIFIED] [data-protection] When is employee information personal information (Is it a continuum or a clear dividing line?)

Harrison, Iain <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:06:07 +0000

177 lines

New Thread

[UNCLASSIFIED] [data-protection] WikiLeaks in Local Government?

Re: [UNCLASSIFIED] [data-protection] WikiLeaks in Local Government?

Harrison, Iain <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2011 10:41:58 +0000

115 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager