JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for POETRYETC Archives


POETRYETC Archives

POETRYETC Archives


February 2011


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"Grand Dunces of the Cattleguard" (1 message)
"Night Thoughts" (3 messages)
"On A Winter Morning" (1 message)
"Puffball Acceptance" (2 messages)
"Undercover" (1 message)
(BAB)bit('s) (3 messages)
(found poem) (5 messages)
<No subject> (1 message)
advertisement for myself (3 messages)
An Infraverbal Poem for Fans of bp Nichol (3 messages)
Belittled death (1 message)
Boat eyes (2 messages)
BRAZENLY --------poem (2 messages)
Broch (5 messages)
CENSORSHIP PROVERBS (1 message)
Château Noir (1 message)
cure???? (2 messages)
Ear Snap (11 messages)
Fête (7 messages)
Facebook (1 message)
Final chapter of VERSE HD video web-series online (1 message)
first book contest in poetry and prose (no fee): Fairleigh Dickinson Univ (1 message)
For better or worse (1 message)
full gush of last week's snap (3 messages)
FW: BRAZENLY --------poem (1 message)
FW: pat snap .-+=_)(_=+-. Wednesday, 09 February 2011 updated (1 message)
FW: pat snap""""""."""""."""""""""".""""""""..""""""Wednesday, 02 February 2011revised!! (2 messages)
Fwd: The Hamilton Stone Review #23 is now up! (1 message)
good start to the day (10 messages)
I am lined - snap (9 messages)
I IS AN OTHER: The Secret Life of Metaphor and How It Shapes the Way We See the World (1 message)
In Clear Conscience (3 messages)
Interim Snap - Vincent (8 messages)
Introducing myself (10 messages)
Jim Goldberg - photographer of the Mideast & (5 messages)
keeping watch snap (6 messages)
laptop sound (1 message)
late snap (2 messages)
Libya et al (1 message)
Manifesto on taking office in Downing Street (7 messages)
Maud snap revised (1 message)
Maud Snapshot (3 messages)
Nights at the Suspended Piglet (3 messages)
Notice: Mudlark (2 messages)
paragraph of the day? (6 messages)
pat snap .-+=_)(_=+-. Wednesday, 09 February 2011 (2 messages)
pat snap >>>>>)*(<<<<<Wednesday, 23 February 2011 (2 messages)
pat snap >>>>>)*(<<<<<Wednesday, 23 February 2011 revised (1 message)
pat snap""""""."""""."""""""""".""""""""..""""""Wednesday, 02 February 2011 (1 message)
pat snap""""""."""""."""""""""".""""""""..""""""Wednesday, 02 February 2011revised!! (1 message)
pat snappe = _^_-)**(-_^ _ = Wednesday, 16 February 2011 (2 messages)
Poetry & code collide (1 message)
Poetry course at Tom Collins House starts this coming Wednesday (2 messages)
re-membering moment (24 messages)
Sexing it Slow (3 messages)
snap (11 messages)
snap - 02011 February 09 (4 messages)
snap - reformed (24 messages)
snap - reformed -- line breaks and spacing (5 messages)
Snap - Vincent (20 messages)
snap / to (1 message)
snap 16/II/11 (5 messages)
Snap Filmmaker Charles Burnett at the NGA (7 messages)
Snap Now Doubly Ekphrastic Twice (1 message)
Snap Those Filmmakers in a Garden Taking a Laundry Break (5 messages)
snap: lip (7 messages)
Snap: Oblivion Ride (1 message)
Snap: only when my eyes are closed (1 message)
snap: Post-Op (2 messages)
snap: short black (5 messages)
snap: the old copywriter (3 messages)
snap: tomato and philtrum (4 messages)
So there you are then, isn't it? (10 messages)
Socratic demise (2 messages)
Sol Literary Magazine invites submissions (1 message)
St Supercilia (2 messages)
Supporting progressive social democractic parties in Australia (1 message)
tears in my eyes (1 message)
test (1 message)
The Codex Book Fair (2 messages)
Vote Now! (5 messages)
[Fwd: Re: Manifesto on taking office in Downing Street] (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

POETRYETC Home

POETRYETC Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"Grand Dunces of the Cattleguard"

"Grand Dunces of the Cattleguard"

James Cervantes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 16:32:53 -0700

77 lines

New Thread

"Night Thoughts"

"Night Thoughts"

Fred Pollack <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 01:10:50 -0500

141 lines

Re: "Night Thoughts"

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 09:25:34 -0700

38 lines

Re: "Night Thoughts"

Fred Pollack <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 16:09:20 -0500

45 lines

New Thread

"On A Winter Morning"

"On A Winter Morning"

James Cervantes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2011 09:42:15 -0700

76 lines

New Thread

"Puffball Acceptance"

Re: "Puffball Acceptance"

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 19:07:32 -0000

61 lines

Re: "Puffball Acceptance"

James Cervantes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 15:27:07 -0700

78 lines

New Thread

"Undercover"

"Undercover"

James Cervantes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2011 07:54:19 -0700

65 lines

New Thread

(BAB)bit('s)

Re: (BAB)bit('s)

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 16:13:22 -0700

39 lines

Re: (BAB)bit('s)

Gerald Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 05:36:23 -0500

38 lines

Re: (BAB)bit('s)

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 19:29:27 +0000

196 lines

New Thread

(found poem)

(found poem)

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2011 17:31:03 -0000

25 lines

Re: (found poem)

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2011 21:48:11 +0000

36 lines

Re: (found poem)

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:21:05 +1100

54 lines

Re: (found poem)

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:21:07 -0700

53 lines

Re: (found poem)

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:56:04 -0000

65 lines

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

Maud Starpey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:56:58 +0000

11 lines

New Thread

advertisement for myself

advertisement for myself

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 09:14:32 -0000

35 lines

Re: advertisement for myself

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:11:00 -0000

47 lines

Re: advertisement for myself

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2011 10:06:44 -0000

108 lines

New Thread

An Infraverbal Poem for Fans of bp Nichol

An Infraverbal Poem for Fans of bp Nichol

Bob Grumman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:10:18 -0500

17 lines

Re: An Infraverbal Poem for Fans of bp Nichol

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:03:57 -0700

44 lines

Re: An Infraverbal Poem for Fans of bp Nichol

Bob Grumman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:17:27 -0500

16 lines

New Thread

Belittled death

Belittled death

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:29:50 -0000

35 lines

New Thread

Boat eyes

Boat eyes

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 21:20:48 +1100

23 lines

Re: Boat eyes

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 11:41:47 -0000

45 lines

New Thread

BRAZENLY --------poem

BRAZENLY --------poem

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Feb 2011 12:43:00 -0000

51 lines

Re: BRAZENLY --------poem

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:40:45 -0700

38 lines

New Thread

Broch

Broch

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 18:21:21 -0000

32 lines

Re: Broch

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 08:49:44 -0700

63 lines

Re: Broch

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 16:15:32 -0000

151 lines

Re: Broch

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:15:32 -0700

207 lines

Re: Broch

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 17:29:18 -0000

260 lines

New Thread

CENSORSHIP PROVERBS

CENSORSHIP PROVERBS

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2011 15:57:16 -0000

40 lines

New Thread

Château Noir

Château Noir

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2011 13:47:30 -0600

75 lines

New Thread

cure????

cure????

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2011 17:39:43 -0000

21 lines

Re: cure????

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2011 08:34:03 +1100

31 lines

New Thread

Ear Snap

Ear Snap

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 08:42:18 -0000

40 lines

Re: Ear Snap

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 09:29:32 -0000

54 lines

Re: Ear Snap

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:01:05 -0000

78 lines

Re: Ear Snap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 09:15:19 -0700

75 lines

Re: Ear Snap

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:28:08 -0000

113 lines

Re: Ear Snap

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 17:09:28 -0000

125 lines

Re: Ear Snap

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 17:13:26 -0000

162 lines

Re: Ear Snap

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 17:47:22 -0000

174 lines

Re: Ear Snap

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 18:06:31 -0000

215 lines

Re: Ear Snap

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 18:56:25 -0000

231 lines

Re: Ear Snap

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 19:17:58 -0000

296 lines

New Thread

Fête

Fête

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2011 12:21:31 -0600

75 lines

Re: Fête

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2011 19:42:31 -0800

48 lines

Re: Fête

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2011 21:58:08 -0600

191 lines

Re: Fête

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Feb 2011 17:39:12 +1100

25 lines

Re: Fête

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 10:55:06 -0700

114 lines

Re: Fête

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 12:13:30 -0600

183 lines

Re: Fête

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:07:52 +0800

233 lines

New Thread

Facebook

Facebook

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:49:49 -0000

42 lines

New Thread

Final chapter of VERSE HD video web-series online

Final chapter of VERSE HD video web-series online

Ram Devineni <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 05:37:39 -0800

24 lines

New Thread

first book contest in poetry and prose (no fee): Fairleigh Dickinson Univ

first book contest in poetry and prose (no fee): Fairleigh Dickinson Univ

Renee Ashley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:18:57 -0500

83 lines

New Thread

For better or worse

For better or worse

Millicent Borges Accardi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 02:02:03 -0500

17 lines

New Thread

full gush of last week's snap

full gush of last week's snap

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 07:08:45 +0800

49 lines

Re: full gush of last week's snap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 08:39:50 -0700

40 lines

Re: full gush of last week's snap

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 16:21:15 +0000

61 lines

New Thread

FW: BRAZENLY --------poem

FW: BRAZENLY --------poem

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:33:12 -0000

39 lines

New Thread

FW: pat snap .-+=_)(_=+-. Wednesday, 09 February 2011 updated

FW: pat snap .-+=_)(_=+-. Wednesday, 09 February 2011 updated

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 16:03:02 -0000

111 lines

New Thread

FW: pat snap""""""."""""."""""""""".""""""""..""""""Wednesday, 02 February 2011revised!!

FW: pat snap""""""."""""."""""""""".""""""""..""""""Wednesday, 02 February 2011revised!!

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 10:12:38 -0000

74 lines

Re: FW: pat snap""""""."""""."""""""""".""""""""..""""""Wednesday, 02 February 2011revised!!

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 17:49:57 +0000

87 lines

New Thread

Fwd: The Hamilton Stone Review #23 is now up!

Fwd: The Hamilton Stone Review #23 is now up!

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:00:10 -0600

24 lines

New Thread

good start to the day

good start to the day

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 07:38:23 -0000

17 lines

Re: good start to the day

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 16:37:41 +0800

30 lines

Re: good start to the day

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 08:48:40 -0000

56 lines

Re: good start to the day

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 17:23:20 +0800

74 lines

Re: good start to the day

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 09:40:43 -0000

132 lines

Re: good start to the day

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 08:47:53 -0700

49 lines

Re: good start to the day

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 16:34:42 +0000

29 lines

Re: good start to the day

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 17:42:21 -0000

43 lines

Re: good start to the day

Kasper Salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 20:07:43 +0200

52 lines

Re: good start to the day

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 19:38:41 -0000

65 lines

New Thread

I am lined - snap

I am lined - snap

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 14:50:42 +0800

35 lines

Re: I am lined - snap

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 07:37:21 -0000

45 lines

Re: I am lined - snap

Marthe Reed <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 07:41:48 -0600

74 lines

Re: I am lined - snap

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 06:43:09 +0800

68 lines

Re: I am lined - snap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 15:58:56 -0700

62 lines

Re: I am lined - snap

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 07:41:29 +0800

77 lines

Re: I am lined - snap

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 08:10:23 +0800

89 lines

Re: I am lined - snap

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 18:15:54 -0800

87 lines

Re: I am lined - snap

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 09:29:14 -0000

107 lines

New Thread

I IS AN OTHER: The Secret Life of Metaphor and How It Shapes the Way We See the World

I IS AN OTHER: The Secret Life of Metaphor and How It Shapes the Way We See the World

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 15:30:26 -0500

93 lines

New Thread

In Clear Conscience

In Clear Conscience

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:10:20 -0600

91 lines

Re: In Clear Conscience

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:29:09 -0700

40 lines

Re: In Clear Conscience

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:27:31 +0800

54 lines

New Thread

Interim Snap - Vincent

Interim Snap - Vincent

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2011 09:47:00 -0800

15 lines

Re: Interim Snap - Vincent

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2011 18:06:14 -0000

46 lines

Re: Interim Snap - Vincent

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2011 12:13:26 -0800

36 lines

Re: Interim Snap - Vincent

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2011 08:45:42 -0700

52 lines

Re: Interim Snap - Vincent

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2011 18:06:04 -0000

88 lines

Re: Interim Snap - Vincent

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2011 12:30:21 -0600

149 lines

Re: Interim Snap - Vincent

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2011 11:57:02 -0800

106 lines

Re: Interim Snap - Vincent

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2011 08:28:53 -0700

48 lines

New Thread

Introducing myself

Introducing myself

Maud Starpey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:03:48 +0000

16 lines

Re: Introducing myself

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:17:00 -0000

29 lines

Re: Introducing myself

Kasper Salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:25:09 +0200

34 lines

Re: Introducing myself

Amanda Surkont <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:25:41 -0800

20 lines

Re: Introducing myself

Ken Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:31:53 -0500

45 lines

Re: Introducing myself

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:52:29 -0800

45 lines

Re: Introducing myself

Maud Starpey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:52:28 +0000

37 lines

Re: Introducing myself

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 21:54:34 +0800

64 lines

Re: Introducing myself

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:33:26 -0700

49 lines

Re: Introducing myself

Maud Starpey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:04:06 +0000

74 lines

New Thread

Jim Goldberg - photographer of the Mideast &

Jim Goldberg - photographer of the Mideast &

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:37:31 -0800

28 lines

Re: Jim Goldberg - photographer of the Mideast &

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2011 00:44:12 +0000

55 lines

Re: Jim Goldberg - photographer of the Mideast &

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2011 09:37:20 -0800

74 lines

Re: Jim Goldberg - photographer of the Mideast &

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Feb 2011 18:18:03 +0000

124 lines

Re: Jim Goldberg - photographer of the Mideast &

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Feb 2011 12:14:08 -0800

73 lines

New Thread

keeping watch snap

keeping watch snap

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 06:16:28 +0800

27 lines

Re: keeping watch snap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:40:16 -0700

56 lines

Re: keeping watch snap

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 06:57:38 +0800

80 lines

Re: keeping watch snap

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:49:25 +1100

39 lines

Re: keeping watch snap

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 07:22:48 -0000

48 lines

Re: keeping watch snap

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 19:20:58 +0000

91 lines

New Thread

laptop sound

laptop sound

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 19:01:15 +1100

31 lines

New Thread

late snap

late snap

sharon brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 18:45:51 -0700

39 lines

Re: late snap

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2011 17:28:56 -0000

52 lines

New Thread

Libya et al

Libya et al

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 12:58:47 -0800

32 lines

New Thread

Manifesto on taking office in Downing Street

Manifesto on taking office in Downing Street

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:53:49 -0000

39 lines

Re: Manifesto on taking office in Downing Street

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:53:07 -0700

71 lines

Re: Manifesto on taking office in Downing Street

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 16:57:07 -0000

100 lines

Re: Manifesto on taking office in Downing Street

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2011 16:32:01 +0000

88 lines

Re: Manifesto on taking office in Downing Street

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2011 18:07:54 -0000

122 lines

Re: Manifesto on taking office in Downing Street

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Feb 2011 17:45:39 +0000

159 lines

Re: Manifesto on taking office in Downing Street

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2011 09:48:48 -0000

49 lines

New Thread

Maud snap revised

Maud snap revised

Maud Starpey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:09:56 +0000

43 lines

New Thread

Maud Snapshot

Maud Snapshot

Maud Starpey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:02:39 +0000

43 lines

Re: Maud Snapshot

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:06:40 -0700

43 lines

Re: Maud Snapshot

Maud Starpey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:07:29 +0000

52 lines

New Thread

Nights at the Suspended Piglet

Nights at the Suspended Piglet

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:57:14 -0600

66 lines

Re: Nights at the Suspended Piglet

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:43:50 -0000

91 lines

Re: Nights at the Suspended Piglet

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:49:42 -0600

167 lines

New Thread

Notice: Mudlark

Notice: Mudlark

William Slaughter <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 17:28:13 -0500

33 lines

Notice: Mudlark

William Slaughter <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Feb 2011 23:59:43 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

paragraph of the day?

paragraph of the day?

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 16:04:31 -0700

38 lines

Re: paragraph of the day?

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2011 08:58:14 -0000

111 lines

Re: paragraph of the day?

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2011 09:21:40 -0000

47 lines

Re: paragraph of the day?

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2011 11:33:32 +0000

35 lines

Re: paragraph of the day?

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2011 12:23:01 -0000

109 lines

Re: paragraph of the day?

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2011 09:30:42 -0700

153 lines

New Thread

pat snap .-+=_)(_=+-. Wednesday, 09 February 2011

pat snap .-+=_)(_=+-. Wednesday, 09 February 2011

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 07:46:46 -0000

56 lines

Re: pat snap .-+=_)(_=+-. Wednesday, 09 February 2011

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 06:46:39 +0800

71 lines

New Thread

pat snap >>>>>)*(<<<<<Wednesday, 23 February 2011

pat snap >>>>>)*(<<<<<Wednesday, 23 February 2011

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 07:39:35 -0000

35 lines

Re: pat snap >>>>>)*(<<<<<Wednesday, 23 February 2011

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 08:56:37 -0700

41 lines

New Thread

pat snap >>>>>)*(<<<<<Wednesday, 23 February 2011 revised

pat snap >>>>>)*(<<<<<Wednesday, 23 February 2011 revised

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 07:49:56 -0000

35 lines

New Thread

pat snap""""""."""""."""""""""".""""""""..""""""Wednesday, 02 February 2011

pat snap""""""."""""."""""""""".""""""""..""""""Wednesday, 02 February 2011

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 08:05:14 -0000

38 lines

New Thread

pat snap""""""."""""."""""""""".""""""""..""""""Wednesday, 02 February 2011revised!!

Re: pat snap""""""."""""."""""""""".""""""""..""""""Wednesday, 02 February 2011revised!!

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 08:50:45 -0700

41 lines

New Thread

pat snappe = _^_-)**(-_^ _ = Wednesday, 16 February 2011

pat snappe = _^_-)**(-_^ _ = Wednesday, 16 February 2011

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:07:44 -0000

41 lines

Re: pat snappe = _^_-)**(-_^ _ = Wednesday, 16 February 2011

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:01:51 -0700

38 lines

New Thread

Poetry & code collide

Poetry & code collide

Séamas Cain <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:14:44 -0600

52 lines

New Thread

Poetry course at Tom Collins House starts this coming Wednesday

Poetry course at Tom Collins House starts this coming Wednesday

Janet Jackson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2011 14:14:36 +0800

103 lines

Re: Poetry course at Tom Collins House starts this coming Wednesday

Janet Jackson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2011 14:19:05 +0800

82 lines

New Thread

re-membering moment

re-membering moment

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:25:41 +1100

48 lines

Re: re-membering moment

Kasper Salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:41:53 +0200

53 lines

Re: re-membering moment

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:25:12 -0700

77 lines

Re: re-membering moment

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:54:15 -0800

66 lines

Re: re-membering moment

Rachel Loden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 13:05:31 -0800

93 lines

Re: re-membering moment

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2011 19:00:36 +1100

149 lines

Re: re-membering moment

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2011 13:08:08 -0800

154 lines

Re: re-membering moment

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Feb 2011 10:40:04 +1100

228 lines

Re: re-membering moment

Rachel Loden <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2011 18:15:32 -0800

269 lines

Re: re-membering moment

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Feb 2011 17:34:45 +1100

23 lines

Re: re-membering moment

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2011 22:49:31 -0800

60 lines

Re: re-membering moment

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Feb 2011 18:51:13 +1100

31 lines

Re: re-membering moment

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 16:59:06 +1100

51 lines

Re: re-membering moment

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Feb 2011 22:35:08 -0800

34 lines

Re: re-membering moment

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 10:29:09 -0500

36 lines

Re: re-membering moment

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 09:34:46 -0600

96 lines

Re: re-membering moment

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 17:34:49 +0000

28 lines

Re: re-membering moment

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 11:43:53 -0600

93 lines

Re: re-membering moment

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 21:03:44 +0000

132 lines

Re: re-membering moment

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:39:38 -0700

51 lines

Re: re-membering moment

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 16:44:45 -0600

114 lines

Re: re-membering moment

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:09:16 -0800

66 lines

Re: re-membering moment

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 16:14:20 -0700

49 lines

Re: re-membering moment

Bob Grumman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 20:21:49 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

Sexing it Slow

Sexing it Slow

Millicent Borges Accardi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 13:20:58 -0500

24 lines

Re: Sexing it Slow

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 10:42:01 +1100

32 lines

Re: Sexing it Slow

Millicent Borges Accardi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 18:56:01 -0500

49 lines

New Thread

snap

snap

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 19:55:31 +1100

36 lines

Re: snap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 16:10:56 -0700

77 lines

Re: snap

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 18:04:21 +1100

24 lines

Re: snap

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 20:10:57 +1100

28 lines

Re: snap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:56:53 -0700

58 lines

Re: snap

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2011 12:54:18 +1100

25 lines

Snap

Marthe Reed <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 08:44:47 -0600

47 lines

Re: Snap

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 17:05:29 -0000

62 lines

Re: Snap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:15:28 -0700

77 lines

Re: Snap

Marthe Reed <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:12:13 -0600

14 lines

Re: Snap

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:30:16 +0800

31 lines

New Thread

snap - 02011 February 09

snap - 02011 February 09

sharon brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 11:15:21 -0700

34 lines

Re: snap - 02011 February 09

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:26:28 -0700

38 lines

Re: snap - 02011 February 09

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:59:00 +1100

37 lines

Re: snap - 02011 February 09

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:02:01 +0800

52 lines

New Thread

snap - reformed

snap - reformed

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 17:31:45 +1030

83 lines

Re: snap - reformed

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 07:39:22 -0000

93 lines

Re: snap - reformed

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 22:51:23 +1030

119 lines

Re: snap - reformed

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 12:33:13 -0000

128 lines

Re: snap - reformed

Kasper Salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 15:02:34 +0200

98 lines

Re: snap - reformed

James Cervantes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 06:33:41 -0700

153 lines

Re: snap - reformed

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 09:12:13 -0700

44 lines

Re: snap - reformed

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:33:12 +1030

63 lines

Re: snap - reformed

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 17:46:27 -0800

81 lines

Re: snap - reformed

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:43:57 +0800

112 lines

Re: snap - reformed

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 15:01:36 +1100

118 lines

Re: snap - reformed

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 15:02:02 +1100

175 lines

Re: snap - reformed

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 15:08:40 +1100

120 lines

Re: snap - reformed

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 15:10:26 +1100

146 lines

Re: snap - reformed

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 07:33:42 -0000

75 lines

Re: snap - reformed

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:34:56 +1100

149 lines

Re: snap - reformed

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 07:45:52 +0000

85 lines

Re: snap - reformed

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:50:16 +1100

111 lines

Re: snap - reformed

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:38:53 -0000

128 lines

Re: snap - reformed

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:59:52 +0000

133 lines

Re: snap - reformed

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:14:12 -0000

148 lines

Re: snap - reformed

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:17:07 -0000

198 lines

Re: snap - reformed

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:46:45 -0000

210 lines

Re: snap - reformed

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:23:15 -0700

41 lines

New Thread

snap - reformed -- line breaks and spacing

Re: snap - reformed -- line breaks and spacing

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:21:02 -0000

100 lines

Re: snap - reformed -- line breaks and spacing

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:22:49 -0800

127 lines

Re: snap - reformed -- line breaks and spacing

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:51:38 -0000

148 lines

Re: snap - reformed -- line breaks and spacing

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 13:20:40 -0600

223 lines

Re: snap - reformed -- line breaks and spacing

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:39:34 -0800

101 lines

New Thread

Snap - Vincent

Snap - Vincent

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 17:41:42 -0800

32 lines

Re: Snap - Vincent

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 09:06:52 -0700

38 lines

Re: Snap - Vincent

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:43:12 -0800

48 lines

Re: Snap - Vincent

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2011 17:32:59 -0000

50 lines

Re: Snap - Vincent

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2011 09:43:26 -0800

64 lines

Re: Snap - Vincent

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2011 17:53:16 -0000

75 lines

Snap - Vincent

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 20:21:04 -0800

39 lines

Re: Snap - Vincent

Ken Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 10:31:26 -0500

54 lines

Re: Snap - Vincent

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 15:55:03 -0700

71 lines

Re: Snap - Vincent

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 09:33:52 -0000

53 lines

Re: Snap - Vincent

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:42:13 -0800

67 lines

Snap - Vincent

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 22:01:52 -0800

35 lines

Re: Snap - Vincent

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2011 17:10:13 +1100

49 lines

Re: Snap - Vincent

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:07:10 +0800

69 lines

Re: Snap - Vincent

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:37:09 +0800

83 lines

Re: Snap - Vincent

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2011 08:56:33 -0700

71 lines

Re: Snap - Vincent

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2011 17:42:42 -0800

116 lines

Snap - Vincent

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 19:59:44 -0800

37 lines

Re: Snap - Vincent

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 08:42:55 -0700

67 lines

Re: Snap - Vincent

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 17:39:13 -0800

85 lines

New Thread

snap / to

snap / to

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:35:16 -0700

41 lines

New Thread

snap 16/II/11

snap 16/II/11

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:05:20 -0700

47 lines

Re: snap 16/II/11

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:37:45 +0000

57 lines

Re: snap 16/II/11

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 09:03:47 -0700

48 lines

Re: snap 16/II/11

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 14:51:42 +1100

63 lines

Re: snap 16/II/11

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:21:38 -0700

47 lines

New Thread

Snap Filmmaker Charles Burnett at the NGA

Snap Filmmaker Charles Burnett at the NGA

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 23:57:08 +0000

41 lines

Re: Snap Filmmaker Charles Burnett at the NGA

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 17:43:50 -0800

31 lines

Re: Snap Filmmaker Charles Burnett at the NGA

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 09:06:16 -0700

42 lines

Re: Snap Filmmaker Charles Burnett at the NGA

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:24:51 +0800

57 lines

Re: Snap Filmmaker Charles Burnett at the NGA

Jill Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2011 14:57:00 +1100

77 lines

Re: Snap Filmmaker Charles Burnett at the NGA

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 17:38:31 +0000

116 lines

Re: Snap Filmmaker Charles Burnett at the NGA

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 08:47:32 -0700

61 lines

New Thread

Snap Now Doubly Ekphrastic Twice

Re: Snap Now Doubly Ekphrastic Twice

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 15:36:13 +0000

137 lines

New Thread

Snap Those Filmmakers in a Garden Taking a Laundry Break

Snap Those Filmmakers in a Garden Taking a Laundry Break

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 14:33:47 +0000

59 lines

Re: Snap Those Filmmakers in a Garden Taking a Laundry Break

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 09:51:53 -0700

42 lines

Re: Snap Those Filmmakers in a Garden Taking a Laundry Break

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:29:05 +0800

56 lines

Re: Snap Those Filmmakers in a Garden Taking a Laundry Break

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 14:32:33 +0000

86 lines

Re: Snap Those Filmmakers in a Garden Taking a Laundry Break

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 09:34:58 -0700

43 lines

New Thread

snap: lip

snap: lip

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 09:01:24 +1100

94 lines

Re: snap: lip

Fred Pollack <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 19:03:50 -0500

103 lines

Re: snap: lip

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 07:30:35 -0000

105 lines

Re: snap: lip

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 19:16:54 +1100

46 lines

Re: snap: lip

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 08:24:49 -0000

64 lines

Re: snap: lip

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 15:57:24 -0700

44 lines

Re: snap: lip

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 07:39:11 +0800

36 lines

New Thread

Snap: Oblivion Ride

Snap: Oblivion Ride

Alexander N. Tan Jr. <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2011 17:22:24 +0000

34 lines

New Thread

Snap: only when my eyes are closed

Snap: only when my eyes are closed

Alexander N. Tan Jr. <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2011 15:55:54 +0000

22 lines

New Thread

snap: Post-Op

snap: Post-Op

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:47:41 +1100

59 lines

Re: snap: Post-Op

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:12:23 -0000

70 lines

New Thread

snap: short black

snap: short black

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 09:40:17 +1100

85 lines

Re: snap: short black

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 07:44:37 -0000

95 lines

Re: snap: short black

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 18:50:03 +1100

106 lines

Re: snap: short black

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 08:59:51 -0700

41 lines

Re: snap: short black

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2011 10:58:47 +1100

30 lines

New Thread

snap: the old copywriter

snap: the old copywriter

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 16:35:30 +0800

30 lines

Re: snap: the old copywriter

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 09:08:07 -0700

61 lines

Re: snap: the old copywriter

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 17:46:43 -0000

43 lines

New Thread

snap: tomato and philtrum

snap: tomato and philtrum

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 11:57:53 +1100

55 lines

Re: snap: tomato and philtrum

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 09:08:29 +0800

73 lines

Re: snap: tomato and philtrum

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 11:03:53 -0000

65 lines

Re: snap: tomato and philtrum

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2011 08:49:45 -0700

48 lines

New Thread

So there you are then, isn't it?

So there you are then, isn't it?

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 22:48:57 +0000

23 lines

Re: So there you are then, isn't it?

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:11:39 -0800

36 lines

Re: So there you are then, isn't it?

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 16:18:02 -0700

41 lines

Re: So there you are then, isn't it?

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 23:58:57 +0000

58 lines

Re: So there you are then, isn't it?

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 00:18:34 +0000

79 lines

Re: So there you are then, isn't it?

Kasper Salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 03:13:11 +0200

34 lines

Re: So there you are then, isn't it?

Kasper Salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 03:17:22 +0200

49 lines

Re: So there you are then, isn't it?

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 08:01:58 +0000

76 lines

Re: So there you are then, isn't it?

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 08:38:48 -0700

43 lines

Re: So there you are then, isn't it?

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 17:31:07 +0000

56 lines

New Thread

Socratic demise

Socratic demise

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 17:57:36 +1100

36 lines

Re: Socratic demise

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 08:53:51 -0700

65 lines

New Thread

Sol Literary Magazine invites submissions

Sol Literary Magazine invites submissions

James Cervantes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 06:47:47 -0700

33 lines

New Thread

St Supercilia

St Supercilia

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2011 16:16:30 +1100

31 lines

Re: St Supercilia

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:01:30 -0700

41 lines

New Thread

Supporting progressive social democractic parties in Australia

Supporting progressive social democractic parties in Australia

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 18:55:29 +1100

36 lines

New Thread

tears in my eyes

tears in my eyes

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 19:15:12 +1100

26 lines

New Thread

test

test

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 12:44:13 -0000

11 lines

New Thread

The Codex Book Fair

The Codex Book Fair

Séamas Cain <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 12:43:52 -0600

27 lines

Re: The Codex Book Fair

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:40:31 -0700

56 lines

New Thread

Vote Now!

Vote Now!

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:02:10 +0800

23 lines

Re: Vote Now!

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2011 08:39:53 -0700

55 lines

Re: Vote Now!

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2011 09:26:13 -0700

56 lines

Re: Vote Now!

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:02:26 +0800

79 lines

Re: Vote Now!

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:00:45 -0700

76 lines

New Thread

[Fwd: Re: Manifesto on taking office in Downing Street]

[Fwd: Re: Manifesto on taking office in Downing Street]

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2011 17:41:48 -0000

129 lines

JISCMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager