|
|
|
Size
|
Re: Analysing the work of a research group
|
Pat Loria |
Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:32:01 +1100 |
382 lines |
Re: Analysing the work of a research group
|
McGrath, Andria |
Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:18:16 +0000 |
663 lines |
Free Research Data Management Workshops in Sheffield 1-3 March 2011
|
Marion Tattersall |
Thu, 3 Feb 2011 15:40:48 +0000 |
48 lines |
subscribe
|
Jennifer Warburton |
Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:08:07 +1100 |
139 lines |
Re: Analysing the work of a research group
|
Jennifer Coombs |
Wed, 16 Feb 2011 12:03:11 +0000 |
286 lines |
Analysing the work of a research group
|
Glen S. |
Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:44:25 -0000 |
658 lines |
Re: Analysing the work of a research group
|
Gerritsma, Wouter |
Thu, 17 Feb 2011 08:44:55 +0100 |
483 lines |
Re: Summary of responses & additional question
|
David Palmer |
Tue, 1 Feb 2011 15:06:11 +0800 |
33 lines |
Booking extended: UHMLG Spring Forum 2011 - Impact: preparing for research assessment
|
Betsy Anagnostelis |
Fri, 25 Feb 2011 16:35:08 -0000 |
342 lines |
Book now - 7 March - UHMLG Spring Forum 2011 - Impact: preparing for research assessment
|
Betsy Anagnostelis |
Fri, 18 Feb 2011 01:32:38 -0000 |
335 lines |
FW: Open Access Citation Impact Advantage: weight of the evidence
|
Alison McNab |
Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:41:28 -0000 |
52 lines |