JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


January 2011


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

Acceptable/Permissible Level of Information - Sickness Recording (1 message)
Acceptable/Permissible Level of Information - Sickness Recording [Scanned][Spam score: 8%] (1 message)
Aggregation - source of requestor (proof) / complex requests (2 messages)
Andy Coulson resigns over phone hacking allegations (1 message)
Andy Gray and Sky Sports (12 messages)
Bankruptcy (3 messages)
Bankruptcy [UNCLASSIFIED] (1 message)
Celebrate data protection day with a cartoon (1 message)
Changes to Councils' RIPA Powers (1 message)
Clegg on Civil Liberties (1 message)
Confirming a False Claim (5 messages)
Councillors should notify (2 messages)
councils not complying with data requirements (1 message)
Data Privacy Day (1 message)
data processor contract (2 messages)
David Cameron's email letter of 19/1/11 (3 messages)
Disclaimers on Email v Links to Disclaimers on Internet Sites (1 message)
DPA v FOI (1 message)
Estranged parent access to primary school child's information (4 messages)
ETHICOMP 2011 - Call for papers (1 message)
FOI Revision Session Recording (1 message)
FOI webcast recording (1 message)
Friday Light Relief - retention of personal data (1 message)
Friday question: Names in subject lines of emails what is your practice Yes, Maybe, or definitely not (7 messages)
FW: Hawktalk: Do privacy laws require prior notification of the publication of personal data? (1 message)
FW: [data-protection] Apple Sued (1 message)
FW: [data-protection] Sharing personal information with local medical practices (1 message)
Google Privacy (1 message)
Hawktalk: Absence of custodial Data Protection offence increases likely use of Malfeasance in Public Office (1 message)
Hawktalk: Clues to the content of a new Data Protection Directive (1 message)
Hawktalk:Privacy issues: Smart Metering, Violent Warning Markers and Undertakings (1 message)
health professions council (2 messages)
ICO to criticise Serious Organised Crime Agency (2 messages)
Information Law Newsletter (1 message)
Interesting article - children and the surveillance state (2 messages)
Is there a duty to advise of information rights under the DPA? (3 messages)
ISEB Data Protection Revision Session (1 message)
ISEB DP Revision Video (1 message)
ISEB FOI Revision Session (1 message)
It's not just the ICO who regulates data breaches (4 messages)
JISC Legal Virtual User Group - Invitation to FE/HE DP List Participants (1 message)
Job Vacancy - Rochdale Borough Council (1 message)
Legal privilege (3 messages)
Legal query (2 messages)
Legal Risks in Cloud Backup (1 message)
Max Mosley Case (1 message)
Missing sentence - sorry I pressed return too quickly (1 message)
Naomi Campbell Privacy case Judgement (1 message)
New FOI Podcast (1 message)
NHS Database (2 messages)
North Yorkshire Police in 39 data protection law breaches (2 messages)
Parental access to student information (again!) (22 messages)
Passwords question (8 messages)
Planning Objection Letters and Data Protection (8 messages)
Recent HESA Staff Data Request (1 message)
Release of personal data (6 messages)
Release of personal data re senior officers salaries (6 messages)
Reminder - ISEB FOI Revision Session (1 message)
Repost - Short Term Data Protection Manager Opportunity (1 message)
Response to COM(2010)609 concerning Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC - 2011 (1 message)
Review of Data Breach Notification law in Europe (1 message)
RIPA Changes Briefing Note (2 messages)
S29 form? (5 messages)
SAR - format of reply (4 messages)
School Parent Database (1 message)
Scottish Court breach (3 messages)
Sharing personal information (2 messages)
Sharing personal information with local medical practices (7 messages)
Short Term Data Protection Manager Opportunity - London (1 message)
SLOUGH DEFAMATION CASE (7 messages)
text to cover DP in contract (1 message)
The muse: SLOUGH DEFAMATION CASE (1 message)
The temporal ethics of evidence. (3 messages)
Today's FOI webcast at 11am (1 message)
Undertaking for inaccurate personal data (1 message)
[UNCLASSIFIED] Aggregation - source of requestor (proof) / complex requests (5 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

Acceptable/Permissible Level of Information - Sickness Recording

Acceptable/Permissible Level of Information - Sickness Recording

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Jan 2011 14:43:07 -0000

46 lines

New Thread

Acceptable/Permissible Level of Information - Sickness Recording [Scanned][Spam score: 8%]

Re: Acceptable/Permissible Level of Information - Sickness Recording [Scanned][Spam score: 8%]

D.Pozorski <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:29:48 -0000

118 lines

New Thread

Aggregation - source of requestor (proof) / complex requests

Aggregation - source of requestor (proof) / complex requests

Jamie Bateman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jan 2011 09:17:06 -0000

242 lines

Re: Aggregation - source of requestor (proof) / complex requests

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jan 2011 09:31:30 -0000

609 lines

New Thread

Andy Coulson resigns over phone hacking allegations

Andy Coulson resigns over phone hacking allegations

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Jan 2011 13:23:31 -0000

289 lines

New Thread

Andy Gray and Sky Sports

Andy Gray and Sky Sports

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Jan 2011 17:26:04 +0000

121 lines

Re: Andy Gray and Sky Sports

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Jan 2011 17:38:36 -0000

437 lines

Re: Andy Gray and Sky Sports

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:17:44 +0000

709 lines

Re: Andy Gray and Sky Sports

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Jan 2011 16:37:19 +0000

117 lines

Re: Andy Gray and Sky Sports

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Jan 2011 18:07:33 +0000

135 lines

Re: Andy Gray and Sky Sports

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Jan 2011 18:38:12 -0000

46 lines

Re: Andy Gray and Sky Sports

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Jan 2011 21:20:32 -0000

265 lines

Re: Andy Gray and Sky Sports

Cotterill, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Jan 2011 08:49:42 -0000

463 lines

Re: Andy Gray and Sky Sports

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Jan 2011 08:56:56 -0000

672 lines

Re: Andy Gray and Sky Sports

Jethro R Binks <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:01:56 +0000

64 lines

Re: Andy Gray and Sky Sports

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:10:26 -0000

160 lines

Re: Andy Gray and Sky Sports

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Jan 2011 11:56:00 +0000

52 lines

New Thread

Bankruptcy

Bankruptcy

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:49:41 -0000

331 lines

Re: Bankruptcy

David Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jan 2011 12:02:25 +0000

163 lines

Re: Bankruptcy

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jan 2011 14:14:23 -0000

492 lines

New Thread

Bankruptcy [UNCLASSIFIED]

Re: Bankruptcy [UNCLASSIFIED]

Healy, Susan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Jan 2011 13:58:29 +0000

490 lines

New Thread

Celebrate data protection day with a cartoon

Celebrate data protection day with a cartoon

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Jan 2011 00:06:17 -0000

168 lines

New Thread

Changes to Councils' RIPA Powers

Changes to Councils' RIPA Powers

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Jan 2011 16:19:11 +0000

108 lines

New Thread

Clegg on Civil Liberties

Clegg on Civil Liberties

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Jan 2011 13:58:21 +0000

49 lines

New Thread

Confirming a False Claim

Confirming a False Claim

Trevor Pearce <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Jan 2011 12:42:32 -0000

218 lines

Re: Confirming a False Claim

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Jan 2011 12:50:22 +0000

441 lines

Re: Confirming a False Claim

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Jan 2011 12:59:27 +0000

516 lines

Re: Confirming a False Claim

Stone, Eric (Staff) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Jan 2011 12:50:31 -0000

500 lines

Re: Confirming a False Claim

Sarah Wickham <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Jan 2011 08:59:24 +0000

137 lines

New Thread

Councillors should notify

Councillors should notify

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:20:53 -0000

211 lines

Re: Councillors should notify

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Jan 2011 18:08:36 -0000

479 lines

New Thread

councils not complying with data requirements

councils not complying with data requirements

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Jan 2011 09:49:18 +0000

37 lines

New Thread

Data Privacy Day

Data Privacy Day

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jan 2011 09:26:56 +0000

85 lines

New Thread

data processor contract

data processor contract

McClen James (South of Tyne and Wear) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:11:06 -0000

220 lines

Re: data processor contract

Ann-Marie Noble <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Jan 2011 16:38:18 -0000

484 lines

New Thread

David Cameron's email letter of 19/1/11

David Cameron's email letter of 19/1/11

Carolyn Howard <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Jan 2011 16:11:05 +0000

153 lines

Re: David Cameron's email letter of 19/1/11

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Jan 2011 16:24:55 -0000

184 lines

Re: David Cameron's email letter of 19/1/11

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Jan 2011 16:31:16 +0000

205 lines

New Thread

Disclaimers on Email v Links to Disclaimers on Internet Sites

Disclaimers on Email v Links to Disclaimers on Internet Sites

Paula Tighe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Jan 2011 17:25:33 -0000

368 lines

New Thread

DPA v FOI

DPA v FOI

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Jan 2011 09:30:28 +0000

34 lines

New Thread

Estranged parent access to primary school child's information

Estranged parent access to primary school child's information

Giles, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Jan 2011 15:30:28 -0000

367 lines

Re: Estranged parent access to primary school child's information

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Jan 2011 15:32:13 -0000

554 lines

Re: Estranged parent access to primary school child's information

David Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Jan 2011 10:31:31 +0000

206 lines

Re: Estranged parent access to primary school child's information

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:55:40 +0000

471 lines

New Thread

ETHICOMP 2011 - Call for papers

Re: ETHICOMP 2011 - Call for papers

CCSR Web Master <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Jan 2011 13:35:19 +0000

520 lines

New Thread

FOI Revision Session Recording

FOI Revision Session Recording

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Jan 2011 12:33:55 +0000

108 lines

New Thread

FOI webcast recording

FOI webcast recording

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Jan 2011 13:52:06 +0000

31 lines

New Thread

Friday Light Relief - retention of personal data

Friday Light Relief - retention of personal data

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Jan 2011 13:38:32 +0000

31 lines

New Thread

Friday question: Names in subject lines of emails what is your practice Yes, Maybe, or definitely not

Friday question: Names in subject lines of emails what is your practice Yes, Maybe, or definitely not

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:20:05 +0000

184 lines

Re: Friday question: Names in subject lines of emails what is your practice Yes, Maybe, or definitely not

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Jan 2011 22:26:22 -0000

294 lines

Re: Friday question: Names in subject lines of emails what is your practice Yes, Maybe, or definitely not

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 Jan 2011 05:09:37 +0000

98 lines

Re: Friday question: Names in subject lines of emails what is your practice Yes, Maybe, or definitely not

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 Jan 2011 02:32:03 -0500

370 lines

Re: Friday question: Names in subject lines of emails what is your practice Yes, Maybe, or definitely not

Andrew Cormack <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Jan 2011 08:38:20 +0000

247 lines

Re: Friday question: Names in subject lines of emails what is your practice Yes, Maybe, or definitely not

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Jan 2011 09:15:13 -0000

176 lines

Re: Friday question: Names in subject lines of emails what is your practice Yes, Maybe, or definitely not

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Jan 2011 14:28:24 -0000

64 lines

New Thread

FW: Hawktalk: Do privacy laws require prior notification of the publication of personal data?

FW: Hawktalk: Do privacy laws require prior notification of the publication of personal data?

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Jan 2011 10:04:04 -0000

221 lines

New Thread

FW: [data-protection] Apple Sued

Re: FW: [data-protection] Apple Sued

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Jan 2011 19:42:00 -0000

604 lines

New Thread

FW: [data-protection] Sharing personal information with local medical practices

FW: [data-protection] Sharing personal information with local medical practices

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:52:34 +0000

604 lines

New Thread

Google Privacy

Google Privacy

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Jan 2011 17:12:05 +0000

42 lines

New Thread

Hawktalk: Absence of custodial Data Protection offence increases likely use of Malfeasance in Public Office

Hawktalk: Absence of custodial Data Protection offence increases likely use of Malfeasance in Public Office

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:24:34 -0000

240 lines

New Thread

Hawktalk: Clues to the content of a new Data Protection Directive

Hawktalk: Clues to the content of a new Data Protection Directive

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:59:00 -0000

192 lines

New Thread

Hawktalk:Privacy issues: Smart Metering, Violent Warning Markers and Undertakings

Hawktalk:Privacy issues: Smart Metering, Violent Warning Markers and Undertakings

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Jan 2011 10:14:55 -0000

237 lines

New Thread

health professions council

health professions council

Ray Cooke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jan 2011 13:01:52 +0000

108 lines

Re: health professions council

Kevin Tarleton (0161 923 6305) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jan 2011 14:29:56 -0000

625 lines

New Thread

ICO to criticise Serious Organised Crime Agency

ICO to criticise Serious Organised Crime Agency

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Jan 2011 19:12:21 -0000

262 lines

Re: ICO to criticise Serious Organised Crime Agency

Chris Spray <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Jan 2011 23:36:13 -0000

578 lines

New Thread

Information Law Newsletter

Information Law Newsletter

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Jan 2011 12:31:58 +0000

113 lines

New Thread

Interesting article - children and the surveillance state

Interesting article - children and the surveillance state

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Jan 2011 13:10:02 +0000

40 lines

Re: Interesting article - children and the surveillance state

j.s.m.whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Jan 2011 13:56:27 +0000

76 lines

New Thread

Is there a duty to advise of information rights under the DPA?

Is there a duty to advise of information rights under the DPA?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Jan 2011 12:42:57 +0000

303 lines

Re: Is there a duty to advise of information rights under the DPA?

Dinsdale, Peter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Jan 2011 13:07:43 -0000

577 lines

Re: Is there a duty to advise of information rights under the DPA?

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Jan 2011 13:14:35 -0000

801 lines

New Thread

ISEB Data Protection Revision Session

ISEB Data Protection Revision Session

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Jan 2011 17:29:21 +0000

98 lines

New Thread

ISEB DP Revision Video

ISEB DP Revision Video

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Jan 2011 11:51:52 +0000

42 lines

New Thread

ISEB FOI Revision Session

ISEB FOI Revision Session

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Jan 2011 14:02:16 +0000

131 lines

New Thread

It's not just the ICO who regulates data breaches

It's not just the ICO who regulates data breaches

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jan 2011 09:28:31 +0000

43 lines

Re: It's not just the ICO who regulates data breaches

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:39:02 +0000

146 lines

Re: It's not just the ICO who regulates data breaches

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:45:27 -0000

84 lines

Re: It's not just the ICO who regulates data breaches

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:53:32 +0000

132 lines

New Thread

JISC Legal Virtual User Group - Invitation to FE/HE DP List Participants

JISC Legal Virtual User Group - Invitation to FE/HE DP List Participants

Jason Miles-Campbell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:34:50 +0000

333 lines

New Thread

Job Vacancy - Rochdale Borough Council

Job Vacancy - Rochdale Borough Council

Toby Davison <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Jan 2011 12:47:15 -0000

367 lines

New Thread

Legal privilege

Legal privilege

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:33:54 +0000

31 lines

Re: Legal privilege

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:39:31 +0000

103 lines

Re: Legal privilege

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Jan 2011 12:20:31 +0000

153 lines

New Thread

Legal query

Legal query

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jan 2011 12:09:07 +0000

30 lines

Re: Legal query

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jan 2011 12:16:05 -0000

109 lines

New Thread

Legal Risks in Cloud Backup

Legal Risks in Cloud Backup

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jan 2011 08:35:23 +0000

31 lines

New Thread

Max Mosley Case

Max Mosley Case

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jan 2011 09:24:52 +0000

48 lines

New Thread

Missing sentence - sorry I pressed return too quickly

Missing sentence - sorry I pressed return too quickly

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Jan 2011 22:43:49 -0000

234 lines

New Thread

Naomi Campbell Privacy case Judgement

Naomi Campbell Privacy case Judgement

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Jan 2011 17:17:53 +0000

169 lines

New Thread

New FOI Podcast

New FOI Podcast

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:49:54 +0000

200 lines

New Thread

NHS Database

NHS Database

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Jan 2011 14:28:24 +0000

44 lines

Re: NHS Database

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Jan 2011 13:24:52 -0000

60 lines

New Thread

North Yorkshire Police in 39 data protection law breaches

North Yorkshire Police in 39 data protection law breaches

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Jan 2011 12:20:46 -0000

99 lines

Re: North Yorkshire Police in 39 data protection law breaches

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Jan 2011 12:30:14 +0000

177 lines

New Thread

Parental access to student information (again!)

Parental access to student information (again!)

Dunster, Jon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jan 2011 12:49:16 -0000

50 lines

Re: Parental access to student information (again!)

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jan 2011 12:54:49 +0000

105 lines

Re: Parental access to student information (again!)

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jan 2011 13:07:31 -0000

132 lines

Re: Parental access to student information (again!)

Lynn Wyeth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jan 2011 13:14:31 +0000

41 lines

Re: Parental access to student information (again!)

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jan 2011 13:14:29 +0000

182 lines

Re: Parental access to student information (again!)

Dunster, Jon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jan 2011 13:29:33 -0000

230 lines

Re: Parental access to student information (again!)

McClen James (South of Tyne and Wear) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jan 2011 14:16:54 -0000

287 lines

Re: Parental access to student information (again!)

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jan 2011 14:35:03 -0000

84 lines

Re: Parental access to student information (again!)

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jan 2011 14:34:56 +0000

319 lines

Re: Parental access to student information (again!)

David Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jan 2011 14:35:15 +0000

362 lines

Re: Parental access to student information (again!)

Dunster, Jon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jan 2011 15:05:33 -0000

109 lines

Re: Parental access to student information (again!)

Dunster, Jon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jan 2011 15:13:35 -0000

393 lines

Re: Parental access to student information (again!)

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jan 2011 15:15:30 -0000

132 lines

Re: Parental access to student information (again!)

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jan 2011 15:20:13 -0000

435 lines

Re: Parental access to student information (again!)

Dunster, Jon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jan 2011 15:25:58 -0000

484 lines

Re: Parental access to student information (again!)

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jan 2011 16:47:49 -0000

535 lines

Re: Parental access to student information (again!)

Bob Vesey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Jan 2011 11:29:44 -0000

124 lines

Re: Parental access to student information (again!)

Dunster, Jon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Jan 2011 12:03:21 -0000

135 lines

Re: Parental access to student information (again!)

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Jan 2011 12:35:04 -0000

185 lines

Re: Parental access to student information (again!)

Dunster, Jon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Jan 2011 13:06:16 -0000

162 lines

Re: Parental access to student information (again!)

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Jan 2011 13:11:00 +0000

272 lines

Re: Parental access to student information (again!)

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Jan 2011 15:18:22 -0000

46 lines

New Thread

Passwords question

Passwords question

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Jan 2011 15:36:27 +0000

68 lines

Re: Passwords question

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Jan 2011 17:10:40 +0000

42 lines

Re: Passwords question

Andrew Cormack <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Jan 2011 17:42:46 +0000

85 lines

Re: Passwords question

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jan 2011 12:20:35 +0000

150 lines

Re: Passwords question

Andrew Cormack <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Jan 2011 07:21:10 +0000

169 lines

Re: Passwords question

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Jan 2011 11:35:16 +0000

332 lines

Re: Passwords question

Andrew Cormack <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Jan 2011 11:52:04 +0000

250 lines

Re: Passwords question

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Jan 2011 17:02:47 +0000

584 lines

New Thread

Planning Objection Letters and Data Protection

Planning Objection Letters and Data Protection

Cotterill, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Jan 2011 10:25:38 -0000

147 lines

Re: Planning Objection Letters and Data Protection

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Jan 2011 10:47:46 -0000

404 lines

Re: Planning Objection Letters and Data Protection

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Jan 2011 10:59:31 +0000

600 lines

Re: Planning Objection Letters and Data Protection

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Jan 2011 11:09:51 +0000

353 lines

Planning Objection Letters and Data Protection

Nic Drew (Cardiff and Vale UHB - IT Security) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Jan 2011 11:25:07 +0000

727 lines

Re: Planning Objection Letters and Data Protection

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Jan 2011 11:31:32 +0000

457 lines

Re: Planning Objection Letters and Data Protection

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Jan 2011 12:04:19 -0000

552 lines

Re: Planning Objection Letters and Data Protection

Cotterill, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Jan 2011 12:01:13 -0000

408 lines

New Thread

Recent HESA Staff Data Request

Recent HESA Staff Data Request

Elizabeth Mackie <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:32:14 +0000

51 lines

New Thread

Release of personal data

Release of personal data

Lynn Wyeth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jan 2011 09:18:42 +0000

51 lines

Re: Release of personal data

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jan 2011 09:25:23 -0000

129 lines

Re: Release of personal data

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jan 2011 09:32:28 -0000

81 lines

Re: Release of personal data

Cotterill, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jan 2011 10:05:36 -0000

117 lines

Re: Release of personal data

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jan 2011 10:47:43 -0000

198 lines

Re: Release of personal data

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jan 2011 10:59:28 +0000

243 lines

New Thread

Release of personal data re senior officers salaries

Release of personal data re senior officers salaries

Cotterill, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jan 2011 09:02:25 -0000

221 lines

Re: Release of personal data re senior officers salaries

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jan 2011 09:35:22 -0000

410 lines

Re: Release of personal data re senior officers salaries

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jan 2011 09:55:15 +0000

440 lines

Re: Release of personal data re senior officers salaries

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:38:26 +0000

601 lines

Release of personal data re senior officers salaries

Cotterill, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:27:32 -0000

94 lines

Re: Release of personal data re senior officers salaries

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:13:44 +0000

164 lines

New Thread

Reminder - ISEB FOI Revision Session

Reminder - ISEB FOI Revision Session

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Jan 2011 13:50:19 +0000

145 lines

New Thread

Repost - Short Term Data Protection Manager Opportunity

Repost - Short Term Data Protection Manager Opportunity

Davies, Sarah <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Jan 2011 13:24:55 -0000

163 lines

New Thread

Response to COM(2010)609 concerning Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC - 2011

Response to COM(2010)609 concerning Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC - 2011

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Jan 2011 22:39:19 -0000

244 lines

New Thread

Review of Data Breach Notification law in Europe

Review of Data Breach Notification law in Europe

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Jan 2011 22:17:29 -0000

210 lines

New Thread

RIPA Changes Briefing Note

RIPA Changes Briefing Note

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Jan 2011 14:28:29 +0000

32 lines

Re: RIPA Changes Briefing Note

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:24:37 +0000

56 lines

New Thread

S29 form?

S29 form?

Dunster, Jon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:56:47 -0000

34 lines

Re: S29 form?

David Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:59:45 +0000

101 lines

Re: S29 form?

Ray Cooke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Jan 2011 11:33:53 +0000

177 lines

Re: S29 form?

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Jan 2011 09:46:51 -0000

126 lines

Re: S29 form?

Ray Cooke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:08:23 +0000

418 lines

New Thread

SAR - format of reply

SAR - format of reply

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:08:03 +0000

33 lines

Re: SAR - format of reply

Cotterill, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:17:19 -0000

92 lines

Re: SAR - format of reply

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:26:35 -0000

109 lines

Re: SAR - format of reply

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:32:01 -0000

77 lines

New Thread

School Parent Database

School Parent Database

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Jan 2011 12:58:39 +0000

100 lines

New Thread

Scottish Court breach

Scottish Court breach

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Jan 2011 14:47:49 +0000

180 lines

Re: Scottish Court breach

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Jan 2011 15:17:26 -0000

514 lines

Re: Scottish Court breach

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Jan 2011 15:27:15 +0000

733 lines

New Thread

Sharing personal information

Sharing personal information

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Jan 2011 11:54:21 +0000

269 lines

Sharing personal information

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Jan 2011 12:14:34 -0000

458 lines

New Thread

Sharing personal information with local medical practices

Sharing personal information with local medical practices

Jaines, Amy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:21:27 -0000

388 lines

Re: Sharing personal information with local medical practices

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:37:47 +0000

549 lines

Re: Sharing personal information with local medical practices

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:40:54 +0000

581 lines

Re: Sharing personal information with local medical practices

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:42:34 -0000

778 lines

Re: Sharing personal information with local medical practices

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:45:54 -0000

877 lines

Re: Sharing personal information with local medical practices

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Jan 2011 17:35:28 -0000

502 lines

Re: Sharing personal information with local medical practices

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Jan 2011 10:21:27 +0000

520 lines

New Thread

Short Term Data Protection Manager Opportunity - London

Short Term Data Protection Manager Opportunity - London

Davies, Sarah <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:43:44 -0000

172 lines

New Thread

SLOUGH DEFAMATION CASE

SLOUGH DEFAMATION CASE

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:05:14 +0000

47 lines

Re: SLOUGH DEFAMATION CASE

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:12:35 +0000

109 lines

Re: SLOUGH DEFAMATION CASE

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Jan 2011 16:17:07 +0000

177 lines

Re: SLOUGH DEFAMATION CASE

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Jan 2011 16:54:28 +0000

205 lines

SLOUGH DEFAMATION CASE

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Jan 2011 17:56:31 -0000

46 lines

Re: SLOUGH DEFAMATION CASE

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Jan 2011 10:36:04 -0000

131 lines

Re: SLOUGH DEFAMATION CASE

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Jan 2011 10:53:23 +0000

202 lines

New Thread

text to cover DP in contract

text to cover DP in contract

Stock, Sara <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:40:02 +0000

227 lines

New Thread

The muse: SLOUGH DEFAMATION CASE

The muse: SLOUGH DEFAMATION CASE

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Jan 2011 10:50:54 -0000

38 lines

New Thread

The temporal ethics of evidence.

The temporal ethics of evidence.

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Jan 2011 11:58:02 +0000

60 lines

Re: The temporal ethics of evidence.

Ward, Ciaran <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:16:06 +0000

123 lines

Re: The temporal ethics of evidence.

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:32:07 -0000

201 lines

New Thread

Today's FOI webcast at 11am

Today's FOI webcast at 11am

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Jan 2011 08:37:28 +0000

94 lines

New Thread

Undertaking for inaccurate personal data

Undertaking for inaccurate personal data

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:56:23 -0000

45 lines

New Thread

[UNCLASSIFIED] Aggregation - source of requestor (proof) / complex requests

Re: [UNCLASSIFIED] Aggregation - source of requestor (proof) / complex requests

Harrison, Iain <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jan 2011 10:18:05 +0000

450 lines

Re: [UNCLASSIFIED] Aggregation - source of requestor (proof) / complex requests

Ray Cooke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jan 2011 10:46:26 +0000

484 lines

Re: [UNCLASSIFIED] Aggregation - source of requestor (proof) / complex requests

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jan 2011 10:51:22 -0000

781 lines

Re: [UNCLASSIFIED] Aggregation - source of requestor (proof) / complex requests

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jan 2011 10:54:46 -0000

343 lines

Re: [UNCLASSIFIED] Aggregation - source of requestor (proof) / complex requests

Ray Cooke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jan 2011 11:03:59 +0000

475 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager