JISCMail - EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Archives

Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Subscriber's Corner

Email Lists

EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Archives

November 2010

View:

Show Author | Hide Author

		LISTSERV Archives
		EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Get Password

Subject	From	Date	Size
Re: Integrating patients values into clinical decision making	Rakesh Biswas	Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:57:34 +0530	331 lines
Re: Integrating patients values into clinical decision making	Michael Power	Tue, 30 Nov 2010 07:15:24 +0000	130 lines
Shortest results section ever?	Ben Goldacre	Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:17:39 +0000	47 lines
Re: Integrating patients values into clinical decision making	Djulbegovic, Benjamin	Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:17:26 -0500	161 lines
Re: Integrating patients values into clinical decision making	Paul Glasziou	Mon, 29 Nov 2010 05:46:03 +0000	129 lines
Integrating patients values into clinical decision making	Malcolm Daniel	Mon, 29 Nov 2010 04:14:46 +0000	100 lines
Re: Information overload, the early years	Michael Power	Mon, 29 Nov 2010 03:58:40 +0000	255 lines
Re: Information overload, the early years	Djulbegovic, Benjamin	Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:18:28 -0500	186 lines
Re: Information overload, the early years	Ernesto Barrera	Sun, 28 Nov 2010 19:12:16 +0100	41 lines
Information overload, the early years	Michael Power	Sun, 28 Nov 2010 16:08:14 +0000	167 lines
Almost gone! Last Chance to book at the reduced rates for any of the 3 EBHC-KT Workshops in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia	Lubna A. Al-Ansary	Fri, 26 Nov 2010 21:34:29 -0800	4110 lines
Re: Integrating patients values into clinical decision making	Piersante Sestini	Fri, 26 Nov 2010 00:31:20 +0100	139 lines
Re: Surgical research	Shaikh, Javed (Capita India)	Thu, 25 Nov 2010 11:33:45 -0000	213 lines
Re: Surgical research	Rakesh Biswas	Thu, 25 Nov 2010 14:33:16 +0530	288 lines
Re: Surgical research	Rakesh Biswas	Thu, 25 Nov 2010 14:33:16 +0530	288 lines
Re: Surgical research	Caroline Boulind	Thu, 25 Nov 2010 07:31:53 +0000	131 lines
Re: Recruiting research participants from social networking sites	Pranab Chatterjee	Wed, 24 Nov 2010 22:05:00 +0530	145 lines
Re: Recruiting research participants from social networking sites	William Grant	Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:45:13 -0500	90 lines
Recruiting research participants from social networking sites	marion waite	Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:47:46 +0000	59 lines
Re: Self-minitoring of Blood Glucose Conference	Ash Paul	Tue, 23 Nov 2010 23:42:45 -0800	424 lines
Choosing the journal with Jane (Journal/Author Name Estimator)	Trish Groves	Tue, 23 Nov 2010 19:21:19 +0000	311 lines
Re: Surgical research	Sensky, Tom	Tue, 23 Nov 2010 17:16:53 +0000	96 lines
Re: Surgical research	Dahm, Philipp	Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:22:39 -0500	72 lines
Re: Surgical research - the IDEAL framework	Trish Groves	Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:14:27 +0000	182 lines
Surgical research	Caroline Boulind	Tue, 23 Nov 2010 15:39:21 +0000	45 lines
Re: BMJ Group Awards 2011	Olive Goddard	Tue, 23 Nov 2010 13:06:45 +0000	110 lines
Beginner /questions about EB Aprroach.	Anoop Balachandran	Tue, 23 Nov 2010 12:41:24 +0000	35 lines
Self-minitoring of Blood Glucose Conference	Olive Goddard	Tue, 23 Nov 2010 12:38:04 +0000	497 lines
Submissions for the January newsletter of the International Society for Evidence-Based Health Care	Paul Glasziou	Mon, 22 Nov 2010 08:34:35 +0000	23 lines
Re: Number of clinical questions per encounter	Paul Glasziou	Sun, 21 Nov 2010 07:36:11 +0000	251 lines
Re: Congratulations to Ben Djulbegovic from our Group	Jim Walker	Thu, 18 Nov 2010 15:53:43 -0500	143 lines
Call for abstracts	Stephan Groombridge	Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:18:28 +0000	39 lines
Re: Congratulations to Ben Djulbegovic from our Group	Ash Paul	Thu, 18 Nov 2010 07:15:12 -0800	299 lines
Re: Congratulations to Ben Djulbegovic from our Group	Djulbegovic, Benjamin	Thu, 18 Nov 2010 09:56:38 -0500	457 lines
Re: Congratulations to Ben Djulbegovic from our Group	Pranab Chatterjee	Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:46:21 +0530	222 lines
Re: Congratulations to Ben Djulbegovic from our Group	Tom Jefferson	Thu, 18 Nov 2010 11:55:51 +0100	181 lines
Re: Congratulations to Ben Djulbegovic from our Group	Ash Paul	Thu, 18 Nov 2010 02:35:29 -0800	123 lines
Job advert Lecturer / Senior Lecturer in Health Services Research in London	Jan van der Meulen	Wed, 17 Nov 2010 16:16:11 +0000	62 lines
Re: Number of clinical questions per encounter	Maskrey Neal	Wed, 17 Nov 2010 13:24:10 -0000	1377 lines
New from TRIP - TILT (Today I Learnt That)	Jon Brassey	Wed, 17 Nov 2010 11:27:35 +0000	94 lines
Re: Number of clinical questions per encounter	Jim Walker	Tue, 16 Nov 2010 10:51:40 -0500	298 lines
Re: Number of clinical questions per encounter	Djulbegovic, Benjamin	Tue, 16 Nov 2010 10:45:14 -0500	269 lines
Re: Number of clinical questions per encounter	Jim Walker	Tue, 16 Nov 2010 10:08:04 -0500	257 lines
Re: Number of clinical questions per encounter	Jeff Harrison	Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:22:01 +1300	588 lines
Re: Number of clinical questions per encounter	Douglas Badenoch	Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:59:57 +0000	1384 lines
Re: Number of clinical questions per encounter	Dawes, Martin	Mon, 15 Nov 2010 13:53:00 -0800	512 lines
Re: Number of clinical questions per encounter	Farhad Shokraneh Naneh Karan	Tue, 16 Nov 2010 01:05:22 +0330	119 lines
Re: Number of clinical questions per encounter	Ash Paul	Mon, 15 Nov 2010 13:10:08 -0800	181 lines
Number of clinical questions per encounter	Dahm, Philipp	Mon, 15 Nov 2010 14:23:19 -0500	20 lines
Latest edition of journal watch	Olive Goddard	Mon, 15 Nov 2010 13:10:12 +0000	86 lines
Re: FW: Bulkmail	Olive Goddard	Mon, 15 Nov 2010 10:59:30 +0000	488 lines
Re: Choosing the journal	Vonville, Helena M	Fri, 12 Nov 2010 11:50:27 -0600	124 lines
SBM-EBM for interventions on populations	Jordan Panayotov	Wed, 10 Nov 2010 14:45:28 +1100	206 lines
Re: SBM-EBM shouting match	Steve Simon, P.Mean Consulting	Tue, 9 Nov 2010 15:39:14 -0600	48 lines
Latest edition of Journal Watch	Olive Goddard	Tue, 9 Nov 2010 09:28:07 +0000	85 lines
Re: Bayesians, likelihood and evidence	Stephen Senn	Tue, 9 Nov 2010 07:41:33 +0000	451 lines
Re: SBM-EBM shouting match	Rakesh Biswas	Tue, 9 Nov 2010 10:54:07 +0530	417 lines
Re: Bayesians, likelihood and evidence	Dan Sontheimer, MD, MBA	Mon, 8 Nov 2010 22:17:04 -0600	875 lines
Re: Bayesians, likelihood and evidence	Hanan Bell	Mon, 8 Nov 2010 19:53:42 -0800	887 lines
Re: Bayesians, likelihood and evidence	Dr. Carlos Cuello	Mon, 8 Nov 2010 19:08:08 -0600	882 lines
Re: Bayesians, likelihood and evidence	Djulbegovic, Benjamin	Mon, 8 Nov 2010 19:09:32 -0500	239 lines
Re: Bayesians, likelihood and evidence	Stephen Senn	Mon, 8 Nov 2010 23:08:13 +0000	219 lines
Re: Bayesians, likelihood and evidence	Dr. Carlos Cuello	Mon, 8 Nov 2010 16:19:22 -0600	579 lines
Re: Bayesians, likelihood and evidence	Djulbegovic, Benjamin	Mon, 8 Nov 2010 15:25:44 -0500	207 lines
Bayesians, likelihood and evidence	Stephen Senn	Mon, 8 Nov 2010 19:59:52 +0000	189 lines
Re: SBM-EBM shouting match	Djulbegovic, Benjamin	Mon, 8 Nov 2010 14:23:00 -0500	156 lines
Re: SBM-EBM shouting match	Steve Simon, P.Mean Consulting	Mon, 8 Nov 2010 12:05:19 -0600	49 lines
Re: SBM-EBM shouting match	Stephen Senn	Mon, 8 Nov 2010 11:29:46 +0000	133 lines
Re: SBM-EBM shouting match	Croft Daniel (RBF) NOC	Mon, 8 Nov 2010 10:53:47 +0000	102 lines
SBM-EBM shouting match	Michael Power	Mon, 8 Nov 2010 10:24:54 +0000	75 lines
Re: Great Anecdotes versus poor science	Stephen Senn	Mon, 8 Nov 2010 07:25:51 +0000	48 lines
Re: Great Anecdotes versus poor science	Jim Walker	Sun, 7 Nov 2010 21:07:27 -0500	168 lines
Evidence for interventions on populations	Jordan Panayotov	Mon, 8 Nov 2010 12:03:54 +1100	660 lines
Re: Too much skepticism/ Too much bad research/Is it like that?	Jeff Harrison	Sun, 7 Nov 2010 09:02:19 +1300	166 lines
Re: Too much skepticism/ Too much bad research/Is it like that?	Ash Paul	Sat, 6 Nov 2010 21:32:28 -0700	311 lines
Re: Great Anecdotes versus poor science	Ash Paul	Sat, 6 Nov 2010 21:06:45 -0700	299 lines
Re: Great Anecdotes versus poor science	Mark V. Johnston	Sat, 6 Nov 2010 20:30:03 -0500	142 lines
Re: Great Anecdotes versus poor science	Djulbegovic, Benjamin	Sat, 6 Nov 2010 21:02:54 -0400	68 lines
Great Anecdotes versus poor science	Stephen Senn	Sat, 6 Nov 2010 17:10:15 +0000	42 lines
Great Anecdotes versus poor science	SUBSCRIBE EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Tom Smith	Sat, 6 Nov 2010 16:56:16 +0000	17 lines
Re: Too much skepticism/ Too much bad research/Is it like that?	Rakesh Biswas	Sat, 6 Nov 2010 15:26:43 +0530	639 lines
Re: Too much skepticism/ Too much bad research/Is it like that?	Jordan Panayotov	Sat, 6 Nov 2010 16:48:39 +1100	253 lines
Re: choosing the journal	Jeff Harrison	Sat, 6 Nov 2010 05:48:28 +1300	211 lines
Re: Too much skepticism/ Too much bad research/Is it like that?	Jeff Harrison	Sat, 6 Nov 2010 05:39:35 +1300	175 lines
Re: Choosing the journal	Rakesh Biswas	Sat, 6 Nov 2010 08:10:35 +0530	370 lines
Re: Choosing the journal	Ash Paul	Fri, 5 Nov 2010 17:37:34 -0700	300 lines
choosing the journal + bad research	Roger Kerry	Fri, 5 Nov 2010 20:03:52 +0000	403 lines
choosing the journal	Marcelo Katz	Fri, 5 Nov 2010 13:55:58 -0200	40 lines
Re: Too much skepticism is just as bad as too little skepticism	Marcelo Katz	Fri, 5 Nov 2010 13:54:41 -0200	169 lines
Too much skepticism is just as bad as too little skepticism	Steve Simon, P.Mean Consulting	Fri, 5 Nov 2010 10:34:31 -0500	68 lines
Re: LET'S TELL IT AS IT IS	Aicken, Catherine	Fri, 5 Nov 2010 11:33:24 -0000	354 lines
LET'S TELL IT AS IT IS	Jordan Panayotov	Fri, 5 Nov 2010 15:07:39 +1100	353 lines
Re: Too much bad research - conflicts of interest in academia	Ash Paul	Thu, 4 Nov 2010 09:29:04 -0700	321 lines
Re: Too much bad research - conflicts of interest in academia	Dawes, Martin	Thu, 4 Nov 2010 06:56:16 -0700	329 lines
Re: Too much bad research - conflicts of interest in academia	Trish Groves	Thu, 4 Nov 2010 10:40:07 +0000	259 lines
Re: Too much bad research - conflicts of interest in academia	Ash Paul	Thu, 4 Nov 2010 03:33:59 -0700	327 lines
Re: Too much bad research - conflicts of interest in academia	Rakesh Biswas	Thu, 4 Nov 2010 13:08:09 +0530	730 lines
australian report on cost effectiveness for a whole lot of interventions	Bruce Arroll	Thu, 4 Nov 2010 06:35:01 +1300	53483 lines
Re: Too much bad research - conflicts of interest in academia	k.hopayian	Thu, 4 Nov 2010 06:17:35 +0000	226 lines
Re: Too much bad research - conflicts of interest in academia	Ash Paul	Wed, 3 Nov 2010 19:23:07 -0700	489 lines
Re: Too much bad research - conflicts of interest in academia	Lubna A. Al-Ansary	Wed, 3 Nov 2010 15:53:25 -0700	150 lines
Re: Too much bad research - conflicts of interest in academia	Lubna A. Al-Ansary	Wed, 3 Nov 2010 15:52:34 -0700	144 lines
Re: Too much bad research - conflicts of interest in academia	Andrzej Glowinski	Wed, 3 Nov 2010 22:14:38 +0000	146 lines
Re: "I'm Sorry Rod Jackson"	Rod Jackson	Wed, 3 Nov 2010 21:47:26 +1300	158 lines
Re: Too much bad research - conflicts of interest in academia	Steve Simon, P.Mean Consulting	Wed, 3 Nov 2010 15:50:28 -0500	56 lines
Re: Too much bad research - conflicts of interest in academia	Fell Greg	Wed, 3 Nov 2010 19:55:16 -0000	382 lines
Re: "I'm Sorry Rod Jackson"	Sadequa Shahrook	Thu, 4 Nov 2010 03:21:05 +0900	405 lines
repost of Transfusions an issue in cancer trials as not SPAM	Paul Elias	Wed, 3 Nov 2010 10:48:59 -0700	40 lines
Re: International Journal of User Driven Health Care special issue Essential and Emergency care	Rakesh Biswas	Wed, 3 Nov 2010 22:35:18 +0530	855 lines
Re: "I'm Sorry Rod Jackson"	Marguerite Koster	Wed, 3 Nov 2010 09:19:09 -0700	211 lines
Re: Too much bad research - conflicts of interest in academia	Burton W. Lee	Wed, 3 Nov 2010 11:40:10 -0400	367 lines
Re: Too much bad research - conflicts of interest in academia	Jon Brassey	Wed, 3 Nov 2010 15:29:02 +0000	260 lines
Transfusions an issue in cancer trials	Paul Elias	Wed, 3 Nov 2010 08:23:37 -0700	27 lines
Delfini Autumn Update	Michael Stuart	Wed, 3 Nov 2010 08:19:00 -0700	70 lines
Re: Too much bad research - conflicts of interest in academia	Poses, Roy	Wed, 3 Nov 2010 11:15:15 -0400	188 lines
Training event: trials registers, trials results registers and other research registers	Julie Glanville	Wed, 3 Nov 2010 13:45:18 -0000	328 lines
Re: Too much bad research - conflicts of interest in academia	Stephen Senn	Wed, 3 Nov 2010 11:13:37 +0000	79 lines
Re: Too much bad research - conflicts of interest in academia	Ben Goldacre	Wed, 3 Nov 2010 11:06:39 +0000	132 lines
Too much bad research - conflicts of interest in academia	Jon Brassey	Wed, 3 Nov 2010 10:57:16 +0000	92 lines
Re: "I'm Sorry Rod Jackson"	Lubna Al-Ansary	Wed, 3 Nov 2010 06:17:31 +0000	157 lines
Re: "I'm Sorry Rod Jackson"	Sadequa Shahrook	Wed, 3 Nov 2010 11:03:34 +0900	130 lines
International Society for Evidence-Based Health Care Newsletter October 2010	Paul Glasziou	Wed, 3 Nov 2010 01:12:31 +1000	31 lines
Re: "I'm Sorry Rod Jackson"	Martin Dawes, Dr.	Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:01:00 -0400	41 lines
"I'm Sorry Rod Jackson"	Neeraj Bhala	Tue, 2 Nov 2010 14:26:01 +0000	263 lines
Re: International Journal of User Driven Health Care special issue Essential and Emergency care	Jordan Panayotov	Wed, 3 Nov 2010 01:17:13 +1100	868 lines
Re: Great joke EBM paper on subgroup analyses in Transplantation Proceedings	Hannah Waterhouse	Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:06:47 +0000	1011 lines
Re: International Journal of User Driven Health Care special issue Essential and Emergency care	Rakesh Biswas	Tue, 2 Nov 2010 10:03:16 +0530	530 lines
Re: International Journal of User Driven Health Care special issue Essential and Emergency care	Jordan Panayotov	Tue, 2 Nov 2010 14:58:42 +1100	468 lines
International Journal of User Driven Health Care special issue Essential and Emergency care	Jane Fitzpatrick	Mon, 1 Nov 2010 15:29:33 +0000	681 lines