JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


November 2010


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

A query relating to 'Turnitin' - your comments please? (3 messages)
Access to children's data (4 messages)
Access to medical records without consent (5 messages)
ADV - RIPA Forms Guidace Manual (1 message)
Advert?? (5 messages)
Advice please (5 messages)
Army captain dumps laptop in skip (2 messages)
As promised, I am going at the end of the day today (1 message)
Calling all Insurance Providers - a question on Electronic Marketing consents (1 message)
Care Council for Wales (2 messages)
Chill Out - Find Love (4 messages)
Civil Monetary Penalities - Progress (1 message)
Complaints Info - Advice please (4 messages)
Consent; Can I consent to data use under one piece of legislation but not another? (2 messages)
Content not Method (1 message)
Council loses personal details of children (3 messages)
Councils and Planning Information (2 messages)
Data Sharing Code (1 message)
Database cross-matching (1 message)
detailed DP analysis available (2 messages)
EU proposes online right 'to be forgotten' (1 message)
EU Pushes for Right to Be Forgotten (1 message)
Facebook (20 messages)
Fax Aware Posters (1 message)
First DP Fines (1 message)
First DP Fines for breaches announced (19 messages)
Fount vs font (meant the former not the latter) (1 message)
FW: [data-protection] Facebook (1 message)
Good News (2 messages)
Google Street View (5 messages)
Got this from another list - about airport body scanners. (1 message)
Government weakens Parliamentary and ICO supervision of the Data Protection Act (1 message)
Hawktalk: Commissioner plays poker with Google (1 message)
ICO warns councils (1 message)
International Transfer (3 messages)
It was only a matter of time! (7 messages)
Leave your personal data on the doorstep (2 messages)
list etiquette (relates to former thread 'Hmm') (2 messages)
Matters of Public Record (3 messages)
Message from Moderators (1 message)
Message from Moderators. No reply to list required. (5 messages)
New Data Mediation Service (1 message)
New OSC Procedures and Guidance and Document (1 message)
NHS Details shared with Facebook (OUTLAW NEWS) (2 messages)
Not For Profit — Food for thought. (2 messages)
Not For Profit - Food for thought. (3 messages)
Parking Tickets (PCNs) - Exemptions under D P? (2 messages)
Parking Tickets (PCNs) - Exemptions under DP? (3 messages)
Parking Tickets (PCNs) - Exemtions under DP? (13 messages)
Pooper snoopers (6 messages)
Pre-Employment Screening (3 messages)
Question DPA s37 (2 messages)
Redaction and the ability to identify (5 messages)
Right to be Forgotten under DPA (1 message)
SAR - Management Planning Exemption (7 messages)
Screening companies using publicly available information (19 messages)
Songdo (1 message)
Spy Barbie (1 message)
Study of nursery children (6 messages)
Subject: [data-protection] USA's "Generally Accepted Privacy Principles" establish an inadequate data protection regime. (2 messages)
Subject:[data-protection] USA's "Generally Accepted Privacy Principles" establish an inadequate data protection regime. (1 message)
T Mobile s55 prosecutions (2 messages)
To listen or not to listen, that is the evidential question (6 messages)
Transferring sick record personal data (3 messages)
U turn on data laws (1 message)
USA's "Generally Accepted Privacy Principles" establish an inadequate data protection regime. (1 message)
Use of tenancy application info - Views Please (5 messages)
Vetting and Barring Scheme (2 messages)
Views Please (7 messages)
When X Factor meets DPA (1 message)
Whose accessible record ? (1 message)
WikiLeaks (6 messages)
Will the ICO be invited to the Royal Wedding? (2 messages)
[Off Topic] I think it's time to go quietly :) (4 messages)
[UNCLASSIFIED] [data-protection] Whose accessible record ? (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

A query relating to 'Turnitin' - your comments please?

A query relating to 'Turnitin' - your comments please?

Barlow, Jackie <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2010 13:38:12 -0000

276 lines

Re: A query relating to 'Turnitin' - your comments please?

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2010 17:02:11 +0000

43 lines

Re: A query relating to 'Turnitin' - your comments please?

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Nov 2010 09:00:05 +0000

411 lines

New Thread

Access to children's data

Re: Access to children's data

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Nov 2010 11:36:00 -0000

79 lines

Re: Access to children's data

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Nov 2010 14:11:02 -0000

105 lines

Re: Access to children's data

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Nov 2010 14:21:06 -0000

132 lines

Re: Access to children's data

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:42:21 +0000

144 lines

New Thread

Access to medical records without consent

Access to medical records without consent

Godfrey, Jenny <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2010 11:53:45 -0000

190 lines

Re: Access to medical records without consent

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2010 11:59:24 +0000

507 lines

Re: Access to medical records without consent

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2010 12:16:20 -0000

411 lines

Re: Access to medical records without consent

Ward, Ciaran <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2010 12:15:11 +0000

644 lines

Re: Access to medical records without consent

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2010 17:27:18 +0000

402 lines

New Thread

ADV - RIPA Forms Guidace Manual

ADV - RIPA Forms Guidace Manual

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Nov 2010 09:54:48 +0000

67 lines

New Thread

Advert??

Re: Advert??

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 11:33:22 +0000

193 lines

Re: Advert??

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 11:40:35 -0000

134 lines

Re: Advert??

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 14:05:15 +0000

391 lines

Advert??

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 15:58:09 +0000

263 lines

Re: Advert??

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 16:06:41 -0000

242 lines

New Thread

Advice please

Advice please

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:44:01 +0000

46 lines

Re: Advice please

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:49:35 +0000

181 lines

Re: Advice please

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:57:33 -0000

121 lines

Re: Advice please

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:14:30 -0000

74 lines

Re: Advice please

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:25:44 +0000

165 lines

New Thread

Army captain dumps laptop in skip

Army captain dumps laptop in skip

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 13:31:20 +0000

189 lines

Re: Army captain dumps laptop in skip

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:00:01 +0000

359 lines

New Thread

As promised, I am going at the end of the day today

As promised, I am going at the end of the day today

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2010 00:36:43 +0000

217 lines

New Thread

Calling all Insurance Providers - a question on Electronic Marketing consents

Calling all Insurance Providers - a question on Electronic Marketing consents

Clare Watts <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:55:39 +0000

50 lines

New Thread

Care Council for Wales

Care Council for Wales

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 14:32:03 +0000

33 lines

Re: Care Council for Wales

David Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Nov 2010 10:41:55 +0000

112 lines

New Thread

Chill Out - Find Love

Chill Out - Find Love

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2010 10:04:07 +0000

36 lines

Re: Chill Out - Find Love

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2010 10:50:06 +0000

90 lines

Re: Chill Out - Find Love

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2010 11:40:10 +0000

174 lines

Re: Chill Out - Find Love

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2010 12:12:08 -0000

246 lines

New Thread

Civil Monetary Penalities - Progress

Civil Monetary Penalities - Progress

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2010 11:43:24 +0000

172 lines

New Thread

Complaints Info - Advice please

Re: Complaints Info - Advice please

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:03:35 -0000

196 lines

Re: Complaints Info - Advice please

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:32:19 +0000

525 lines

Re: Complaints Info - Advice please

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:02:25 -0000

417 lines

Re: Complaints Info - Advice please

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:18:46 -0000

475 lines

New Thread

Consent; Can I consent to data use under one piece of legislation but not another?

Consent; Can I consent to data use under one piece of legislation but not another?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 19:22:41 +0000

306 lines

Re: Consent; Can I consent to data use under one piece of legislation but not another?

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 20:36:33 -0000

202 lines

New Thread

Content not Method

Content not Method

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 11:15:18 +0000

78 lines

New Thread

Council loses personal details of children

Council loses personal details of children

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:27:00 +0000

52 lines

Re: Council loses personal details of children

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:58:34 +0000

122 lines

Re: Council loses personal details of children

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:06:36 +0000

134 lines

New Thread

Councils and Planning Information

Councils and Planning Information

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Nov 2010 10:43:37 +0000

44 lines

Re: Councils and Planning Information

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Nov 2010 13:12:36 +0000

87 lines

New Thread

Data Sharing Code

Data Sharing Code

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:23:39 +0000

55 lines

New Thread

Database cross-matching

Database cross-matching

Nic Drew (Cardiff and Vale UHB - IT Security) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2010 14:41:44 +0000

311 lines

New Thread

detailed DP analysis available

detailed DP analysis available

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 12:30:31 -0000

314 lines

Re: detailed DP analysis available

Andrew Cormack <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2010 15:44:00 +0000

92 lines

New Thread

EU proposes online right 'to be forgotten'

EU proposes online right 'to be forgotten'

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Nov 2010 20:15:36 +0000

34 lines

New Thread

EU Pushes for Right to Be Forgotten

EU Pushes for Right to Be Forgotten

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:26:08 +0000

42 lines

New Thread

Facebook

Facebook

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 10:01:53 +0000

268 lines

Re: Facebook

James Walkom <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 10:37:44 -0000

803 lines

Re: Facebook

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 10:43:48 -0000

492 lines

Re: Facebook

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 10:51:33 -0000

586 lines

Re: Facebook

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 05:56:20 -0500

468 lines

Re: Facebook

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 10:52:25 -0000

729 lines

Re: Facebook

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 11:25:09 +0000

378 lines

Re: Facebook

Ben Plouviez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 11:28:26 -0000

548 lines

Re: Facebook

Joe Sutton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 11:40:52 +0000

237 lines

Re: Facebook

Dodgson, Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 11:39:46 +0000

840 lines

Re: Facebook

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 11:44:29 +0000

953 lines

Re: Facebook

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:04:57 +0000

932 lines

Re: Facebook

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:09:24 -0000

405 lines

Re: Facebook

Dodgson, Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:15:31 +0000

874 lines

Re: Facebook

James Walkom <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:36:40 -0000

908 lines

Re: Facebook

Joe Sutton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 13:16:39 +0000

772 lines

Re: Facebook

James Walkom <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 15:40:31 -0000

671 lines

Re: Facebook

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 15:58:44 -0000

391 lines

Re: Facebook

Joe Sutton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:03:59 +0000

842 lines

Re: Facebook

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:24:46 -0000

882 lines

New Thread

Fax Aware Posters

Fax Aware Posters

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:41:45 +0000

69 lines

New Thread

First DP Fines

First DP Fines

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:36:43 +0000

48 lines

New Thread

First DP Fines for breaches announced

First DP Fines for breaches announced

Clare Watts <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2010 07:08:43 +0000

39 lines

Re: First DP Fines for breaches announced

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:37:39 +0000

178 lines

Re: First DP Fines for breaches announced

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:45:40 +0000

423 lines

Re: First DP Fines for breaches announced

Chris Spray <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2010 21:58:56 -0000

523 lines

Re: First DP Fines for breaches announced

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 08:59:28 -0000

794 lines

Re: First DP Fines for breaches announced

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 09:23:00 +0000

133 lines

Re: First DP Fines for breaches announced

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 09:42:56 -0000

84 lines

Re: First DP Fines for breaches announced

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 09:55:29 +0000

196 lines

Re: First DP Fines for breaches announced

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 10:20:00 -0000

278 lines

Re: First DP Fines for breaches announced

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 10:59:56 +0000

376 lines

Re: First DP Fines for breaches announced

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 11:06:11 -0000

781 lines

Re: First DP Fines for breaches announced

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 11:11:37 +0000

881 lines

Re: First DP Fines for breaches announced

Sara Owens <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 11:24:31 -0000

586 lines

Re: First DP Fines for breaches announced

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 11:44:04 -0000

340 lines

Re: First DP Fines for breaches announced

Watts, Clare (C.) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 11:47:02 -0000

573 lines

Re: First DP Fines for breaches announced

David Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 11:58:53 +0000

47 lines

Re: First DP Fines for breaches announced

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 12:03:09 +0000

305 lines

Re: First DP Fines for breaches announced

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 12:07:57 +0000

116 lines

Re: First DP Fines for breaches announced

Chris Spray <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Nov 2010 19:29:10 -0000

425 lines

New Thread

Fount vs font (meant the former not the latter)

Fount vs font (meant the former not the latter)

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:26:31 +0000

935 lines

New Thread

FW: [data-protection] Facebook

FW: [data-protection] Facebook

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:01:05 -0000

316 lines

New Thread

Good News

Good News

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Nov 2010 11:16:28 +0000

38 lines

Re: Good News

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Nov 2010 11:40:16 +0000

318 lines

New Thread

Google Street View

Google Street View

Ray Cooke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Nov 2010 12:32:41 +0000

106 lines

Re: Google Street View

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Nov 2010 12:42:08 +0000

152 lines

Re: Google Street View

Robert (Bob) Waixel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Nov 2010 19:49:31 +0000

123 lines

Google Street View

Kevin Broadfoot <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 11:53:33 +0000

38 lines

Re: Google Street View

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 14:07:31 +0000

38 lines

New Thread

Got this from another list - about airport body scanners.

Got this from another list - about airport body scanners.

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Nov 2010 20:18:06 -0000

203 lines

New Thread

Government weakens Parliamentary and ICO supervision of the Data Protection Act

Government weakens Parliamentary and ICO supervision of the Data Protection Act

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2010 13:20:09 -0000

274 lines

New Thread

Hawktalk: Commissioner plays poker with Google

Hawktalk: Commissioner plays poker with Google

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Nov 2010 12:12:12 -0000

225 lines

New Thread

ICO warns councils

ICO warns councils

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2010 09:13:57 +0000

41 lines

New Thread

International Transfer

International Transfer

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2010 08:50:42 +0000

40 lines

Re: International Transfer

Ray Cooke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2010 10:55:35 +0000

183 lines

Re: International Transfer

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2010 15:55:31 +0000

30 lines

New Thread

It was only a matter of time!

It was only a matter of time!

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Nov 2010 09:01:07 +0000

98 lines

Re: It was only a matter of time!

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:33:43 +0000

206 lines

Re: It was only a matter of time!

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2010 17:16:51 +0000

636 lines

Re: It was only a matter of time!

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2010 17:33:15 +0000

643 lines

Re: It was only a matter of time!

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2010 08:52:23 +0000

759 lines

Re: It was only a matter of time!

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2010 10:34:02 +0000

907 lines

Re: It was only a matter of time!

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Nov 2010 08:53:17 +0000

42 lines

New Thread

Leave your personal data on the doorstep

Leave your personal data on the doorstep

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2010 14:01:44 +0000

165 lines

Re: Leave your personal data on the doorstep

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2010 17:28:19 +0000

359 lines

New Thread

list etiquette (relates to former thread 'Hmm')

list etiquette (relates to former thread 'Hmm')

Mark van Harmelen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2010 11:39:48 +0000

180 lines

Re: list etiquette (relates to former thread 'Hmm')

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2010 12:01:51 +0000

368 lines

New Thread

Matters of Public Record

Matters of Public Record

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 11:15:11 +0000

171 lines

Re: Matters of Public Record

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 11:41:50 +0000

443 lines

Re: Matters of Public Record

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 11:56:42 +0000

588 lines

New Thread

Message from Moderators

Message from Moderators

Paul Simpkins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Nov 2010 22:56:24 -0000

171 lines

New Thread

Message from Moderators. No reply to list required.

Message from Moderators. No reply to list required.

Paul Simpkins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2010 13:41:34 -0000

603 lines

Re: Message from Moderators. No reply to list required.

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2010 14:09:13 +0000

731 lines

Re: Message from Moderators. No reply to list required.

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2010 17:17:50 +0000

637 lines

Re: Message from Moderators. No reply to list required.

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:54:46 -0000

230 lines

Re: Message from Moderators. No reply to list required.

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:11:54 +0000

594 lines

New Thread

New Data Mediation Service

New Data Mediation Service

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Nov 2010 14:40:28 +0000

44 lines

New Thread

New OSC Procedures and Guidance and Document

New OSC Procedures and Guidance and Document

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2010 14:48:15 +0000

60 lines

New Thread

NHS Details shared with Facebook (OUTLAW NEWS)

NHS Details shared with Facebook (OUTLAW NEWS)

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Nov 2010 17:51:25 -0000

36 lines

Re: NHS Details shared with Facebook (OUTLAW NEWS)

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Nov 2010 00:37:14 +0000

190 lines

New Thread

Not For Profit — Food for thought.

Not For Profit — Food for thought.

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Nov 2010 11:51:00 +0000

70 lines

Re: Not For Profit — Food for thought.

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Nov 2010 12:47:53 +0000

100 lines

New Thread

Not For Profit - Food for thought.

Re: Not For Profit - Food for thought.

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Nov 2010 02:45:18 -0000

121 lines

Re: Not For Profit - Food for thought.

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Nov 2010 11:56:05 +0000

159 lines

Re: Not For Profit - Food for thought.

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Nov 2010 16:57:59 +0000

202 lines

New Thread

Parking Tickets (PCNs) - Exemptions under D P?

Re: Parking Tickets (PCNs) - Exemptions under D P?

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 12:24:40 -0000

116 lines

Re: Parking Tickets (PCNs) - Exemptions under D P?

Wilson, Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 12:38:28 -0000

185 lines

New Thread

Parking Tickets (PCNs) - Exemptions under DP?

Re: Parking Tickets (PCNs) - Exemptions under DP?

David Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 12:04:08 +0000

62 lines

Re: Parking Tickets (PCNs) - Exemptions under DP?

Lynn Wyeth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 12:13:12 +0000

48 lines

Re: Parking Tickets (PCNs) - Exemptions under DP?

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 12:37:03 -0000

136 lines

New Thread

Parking Tickets (PCNs) - Exemtions under DP?

Parking Tickets (PCNs) - Exemtions under DP?

Lynn Wyeth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 11:52:39 +0000

75 lines

Re: Parking Tickets (PCNs) - Exemtions under DP?

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 12:00:24 -0000

158 lines

Re: Parking Tickets (PCNs) - Exemtions under DP?

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 12:20:50 +0000

234 lines

Re: Parking Tickets (PCNs) - Exemtions under DP?

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 12:40:06 -0000

294 lines

Parking Tickets (PCNs) - Exemtions under DP?

Lynn Wyeth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 12:55:58 +0000

65 lines

Re: Parking Tickets (PCNs) - Exemtions under DP?

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 13:10:45 -0000

149 lines

Re: Parking Tickets (PCNs) - Exemtions under DP?

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 13:20:42 +0000

140 lines

Re: Parking Tickets (PCNs) - Exemtions under DP?

Lynn Wyeth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 14:12:14 +0000

47 lines

Re: Parking Tickets (PCNs) - Exemtions under DP?

Alan Stead <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 14:36:58 +0000

97 lines

Re: Parking Tickets (PCNs) - Exemtions under DP?

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 15:58:31 +0000

38 lines

Re: Parking Tickets (PCNs) - Exemtions under DP?

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 16:01:14 +0000

39 lines

Re: Parking Tickets (PCNs) - Exemtions under DP?

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 16:09:11 -0000

37 lines

Re: Parking Tickets (PCNs) - Exemtions under DP?

Chris Spray <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 21:23:49 -0000

309 lines

New Thread

Pooper snoopers

Pooper snoopers

Ray Cooke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 09:06:04 +0000

81 lines

Re: Pooper snoopers

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 10:47:33 -0000

372 lines

Re: Pooper snoopers

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 11:07:33 +0000

571 lines

Re: Pooper snoopers

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Nov 2010 21:20:47 -0000

729 lines

Re: Pooper snoopers

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Nov 2010 08:55:04 +0000

352 lines

Re: Pooper snoopers

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Nov 2010 16:48:42 -0000

668 lines

New Thread

Pre-Employment Screening

Pre-Employment Screening

Chris Brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:55:57 +0000

407 lines

Re: Pre-Employment Screening

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:15:03 +0000

215 lines

Re: Pre-Employment Screening

Chris Brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:20:46 +0000

254 lines

New Thread

Question DPA s37

Question DPA s37

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:55:27 +0000

173 lines

Re: Question DPA s37

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:02:16 -0000

624 lines

New Thread

Redaction and the ability to identify

Redaction and the ability to identify

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:20:05 -0000

92 lines

Re: Redaction and the ability to identify

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:24:32 +0000

305 lines

Re: Redaction and the ability to identify

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:37:22 +0000

173 lines

Re: Redaction and the ability to identify

Samuel Price <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:52:15 -0000

224 lines

Re: Redaction and the ability to identify

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2010 18:34:06 -0000

677 lines

New Thread

Right to be Forgotten under DPA

Right to be Forgotten under DPA

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Nov 2010 09:18:37 +0000

186 lines

New Thread

SAR - Management Planning Exemption

SAR - Management Planning Exemption

Ward, Ciaran <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2010 16:41:59 +0000

311 lines

Re: SAR - Management Planning Exemption

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2010 16:57:48 -0000

621 lines

Re: SAR - Management Planning Exemption

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Nov 2010 09:00:20 +0000

41 lines

Re: SAR - Management Planning Exemption

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Nov 2010 10:10:48 -0000

181 lines

Re: SAR - Management Planning Exemption

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Nov 2010 10:30:25 +0000

68 lines

Re: SAR - Management Planning Exemption

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Nov 2010 15:43:58 +0000

137 lines

Re: SAR - Management Planning Exemption

Ward, Ciaran <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Nov 2010 11:25:23 +0000

52 lines

New Thread

Screening companies using publicly available information

Screening companies using publicly available information

Matt Morrison <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 09:05:49 +0000

65 lines

Re: Screening companies using publicly available information

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 04:30:55 -0500

140 lines

Re: Screening companies using publicly available information

Matt Morrison <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 09:38:22 +0000

174 lines

Re: Screening companies using publicly available information

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 04:39:49 -0500

215 lines

Re: Screening companies using publicly available information

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 09:30:58 +0000

260 lines

Re: Screening companies using publicly available information

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 09:41:57 +0000

408 lines

Re: Screening companies using publicly available information

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 09:45:11 -0000

594 lines

Re: Screening companies using publicly available information

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 09:55:43 +0000

407 lines

Re: Screening companies using publicly available information

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 10:28:49 +0000

507 lines

Re: Screening companies using publicly available information

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 11:15:02 +0000

760 lines

Re: Screening companies using publicly available information

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:27:06 -0000

139 lines

Re: Screening companies using publicly available information

Matt Morrison <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:37:07 +0000

188 lines

Re: Screening companies using publicly available information

Chris Brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:55:15 +0000

332 lines

Re: Screening companies using publicly available information

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:15:46 +0000

130 lines

Re: Screening companies using publicly available information

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 14:55:56 -0000

158 lines

Re: Screening companies using publicly available information

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 15:04:03 +0000

237 lines

Re: Screening companies using publicly available information

Chris Spray <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 22:15:07 -0000

174 lines

Re: Screening companies using publicly available information

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:01:27 +0000

275 lines

Re: Screening companies using publicly available information

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:14:43 -0000

545 lines

New Thread

Songdo

Songdo

Mark van Harmelen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Nov 2010 22:59:43 +0000

79 lines

New Thread

Spy Barbie

Spy Barbie

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Nov 2010 08:58:48 +0000

38 lines

New Thread

Study of nursery children

Study of nursery children

Wendy Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 12:20:41 +0000

52 lines

Re: Study of nursery children

Giles, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 12:47:58 -0000

593 lines

Re: Study of nursery children

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 13:04:31 -0000

783 lines

Re: Study of nursery children

Ian Barker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 14:19:02 +0000

54 lines

Re: Study of nursery children

Chris Spray <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 22:47:45 -0000

341 lines

Re: Study of nursery children

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2010 14:26:00 -0000

756 lines

New Thread

Subject: [data-protection] USA's "Generally Accepted Privacy Principles" establish an inadequate data protection regime.

Re: Subject: [data-protection] USA's "Generally Accepted Privacy Principles" establish an inadequate data protection regime.

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Nov 2010 15:56:47 +0000

164 lines

Re: Subject: [data-protection] USA's "Generally Accepted Privacy Principles" establish an inadequate data protection regime.

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Nov 2010 13:42:29 +0000

52 lines

New Thread

Subject:[data-protection] USA's "Generally Accepted Privacy Principles" establish an inadequate data protection regime.

Re: Subject:[data-protection] USA's "Generally Accepted Privacy Principles" establish an inadequate data protection regime.

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Nov 2010 13:45:06 +0000

59 lines

New Thread

T Mobile s55 prosecutions

T Mobile s55 prosecutions

Kevin Broadfoot <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:21:48 +0000

43 lines

Re: T Mobile s55 prosecutions

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:02:36 +0000

107 lines

New Thread

To listen or not to listen, that is the evidential question

To listen or not to listen, that is the evidential question

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2010 21:01:28 +0000

186 lines

Re: To listen or not to listen, that is the evidential question

Lynn Wyeth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2010 08:15:25 +0000

28 lines

Re: To listen or not to listen, that is the evidential question

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2010 10:50:31 +0000

452 lines

Re: To listen or not to listen, that is the evidential question

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2010 11:10:25 +0000

206 lines

Re: To listen or not to listen, that is the evidential question

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2010 11:04:00 -0000

759 lines

Re: To listen or not to listen, that is the evidential question

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2010 11:24:11 +0000

241 lines

New Thread

Transferring sick record personal data

Transferring sick record personal data

Godfrey, Jenny <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:05:27 -0000

188 lines

Re: Transferring sick record personal data

Ward, Ciaran <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:12:43 +0000

615 lines

Re: Transferring sick record personal data

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2010 17:49:42 +0000

245 lines

New Thread

U turn on data laws

U turn on data laws

Nic Drew (Cardiff and Vale UHB - IT Security) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:03:58 +0000

315 lines

New Thread

USA's "Generally Accepted Privacy Principles" establish an inadequate data protection regime.

USA's "Generally Accepted Privacy Principles" establish an inadequate data protection regime.

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 13:32:17 -0000

239 lines

New Thread

Use of tenancy application info - Views Please

Use of tenancy application info - Views Please

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 14:25:02 +0000

38 lines

Re: Use of tenancy application info - Views Please

Dodgson, Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 14:29:20 +0000

73 lines

Re: Use of tenancy application info - Views Please

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 14:41:59 -0000

161 lines

Re: Use of tenancy application info - Views Please

Giles, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 14:45:19 -0000

557 lines

Re: Use of tenancy application info - Views Please

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 15:11:43 -0000

130 lines

New Thread

Vetting and Barring Scheme

Vetting and Barring Scheme

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 08:40:42 +0000

49 lines

Re: Vetting and Barring Scheme

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 08:53:14 +0000

37 lines

New Thread

Views Please

Views Please

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 12:17:17 +0000

46 lines

Re: Views Please

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 12:21:02 +0000

85 lines

Re: Views Please

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 12:24:51 -0000

161 lines

Re: Views Please

Piers Margetts <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 13:17:30 -0000

195 lines

Re: Views Please

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 13:27:45 +0000

224 lines

Re: Views Please

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:37:11 +0000

226 lines

Re: Views Please

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 20:17:30 -0000

368 lines

New Thread

When X Factor meets DPA

When X Factor meets DPA

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Nov 2010 13:25:14 +0000

42 lines

New Thread

Whose accessible record ?

Whose accessible record ?

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:18:09 +0000

50 lines

New Thread

WikiLeaks

WikiLeaks

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:17:50 +0000

50 lines

Re: WikiLeaks

Ward, Ciaran <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:24:03 +0000

124 lines

Re: WikiLeaks

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2010 10:13:09 +0000

44 lines

Re: WikiLeaks

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2010 10:42:55 +0000

111 lines

Re: WikiLeaks

Ward, Ciaran <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:10:58 +0000

74 lines

Re: WikiLeaks

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:22:55 -0000

125 lines

New Thread

Will the ICO be invited to the Royal Wedding?

Will the ICO be invited to the Royal Wedding?

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Nov 2010 13:31:40 +0000

42 lines

Re: Will the ICO be invited to the Royal Wedding?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Nov 2010 13:46:39 +0000

263 lines

New Thread

[Off Topic] I think it's time to go quietly :)

[Off Topic] I think it's time to go quietly :)

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Nov 2010 15:31:19 +0000

256 lines

Re: [Off Topic] I think it's time to go quietly :)

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:23:36 +0000

708 lines

Re: [Off Topic] I think it's time to go quietly :)

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:55:40 -0000

792 lines

Re: [Off Topic] I think it's time to go quietly :)

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Nov 2010 18:24:05 -0000

242 lines

New Thread

[UNCLASSIFIED] [data-protection] Whose accessible record ?

Re: [UNCLASSIFIED] [data-protection] Whose accessible record ?

Harrison, Iain <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:55:26 +0000

118 lines

JISCMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager