JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


November 2010


View:

Show Author | Hide Author

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject

From

Date Sorted by Date, Most Recent First

Size

EU Pushes for Right to Be Forgotten

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:26:08 +0000

42 lines

Re: WikiLeaks

Griffiths, Ian

Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:22:55 -0000

125 lines

U turn on data laws

Nic Drew (Cardiff and Vale UHB - IT Security)

Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:03:58 +0000

315 lines

Re: Pre-Employment Screening

Chris Brogan

Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:20:46 +0000

254 lines

Re: Pre-Employment Screening

Ian Welton

Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:15:03 +0000

215 lines

Re: WikiLeaks

Ward, Ciaran

Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:10:58 +0000

74 lines

Re: Complaints Info - Advice please

Jane Holden

Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:18:46 -0000

475 lines

Re: Complaints Info - Advice please

Tim Turner

Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:02:25 -0000

417 lines

Re: Complaints Info - Advice please

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:32:19 +0000

525 lines

Re: Advice please

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:25:44 +0000

165 lines

Re: Advice please

Griffiths, Ian

Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:14:30 -0000

74 lines

Re: Complaints Info - Advice please

Jane Holden

Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:03:35 -0000

196 lines

Re: Advice please

Bradshaw, Phillip

Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:57:33 -0000

121 lines

Re: Advice please

Tim Trent

Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:49:35 +0000

181 lines

Advice please

Brenda Scourfield

Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:44:01 +0000

46 lines

Re: WikiLeaks

Lawrence Serewicz

Tue, 30 Nov 2010 10:42:55 +0000

111 lines

Re: WikiLeaks

Roland Perry

Tue, 30 Nov 2010 10:13:09 +0000

44 lines

Pre-Employment Screening

Chris Brogan

Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:55:57 +0000

407 lines

Re: WikiLeaks

Ward, Ciaran

Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:24:03 +0000

124 lines

As promised, I am going at the end of the day today

Tim Trent

Tue, 30 Nov 2010 00:36:43 +0000

217 lines

Fax Aware Posters

Ibrahim Hasan

Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:41:45 +0000

69 lines

WikiLeaks

Ibrahim Hasan

Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:17:50 +0000

50 lines

Re: Subject:[data-protection] USA's "Generally Accepted Privacy Principles" establish an inadequate data protection regime.

Ian Welton

Sun, 28 Nov 2010 13:45:06 +0000

59 lines

Re: Subject: [data-protection] USA's "Generally Accepted Privacy Principles" establish an inadequate data protection regime.

Ian Welton

Sun, 28 Nov 2010 13:42:29 +0000

52 lines

Re: Subject: [data-protection] USA's "Generally Accepted Privacy Principles" establish an inadequate data protection regime.

Ian Welton

Sat, 27 Nov 2010 15:56:47 +0000

164 lines

Re: Will the ICO be invited to the Royal Wedding?

Tim Trent

Sat, 27 Nov 2010 13:46:39 +0000

263 lines

Will the ICO be invited to the Royal Wedding?

Ibrahim Hasan

Sat, 27 Nov 2010 13:31:40 +0000

42 lines

When X Factor meets DPA

Ibrahim Hasan

Sat, 27 Nov 2010 13:25:14 +0000

42 lines

Re: NHS Details shared with Facebook (OUTLAW NEWS)

Tim Trent

Sat, 27 Nov 2010 00:37:14 +0000

190 lines

Re: First DP Fines for breaches announced

Chris Spray

Fri, 26 Nov 2010 19:29:10 -0000

425 lines

NHS Details shared with Facebook (OUTLAW NEWS)

Simon Howarth

Fri, 26 Nov 2010 17:51:25 -0000

36 lines

Re: Care Council for Wales

David Wilson

Fri, 26 Nov 2010 10:41:55 +0000

112 lines

Care Council for Wales

Brenda Scourfield

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 14:32:03 +0000

33 lines

USA's "Generally Accepted Privacy Principles" establish an inadequate data protection regime.

chris pounder

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 13:32:17 -0000

239 lines

Re: First DP Fines for breaches announced

Baines, Jonathan

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 12:07:57 +0000

116 lines

Re: First DP Fines for breaches announced

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 12:03:09 +0000

305 lines

Re: First DP Fines for breaches announced

David Wilson

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 11:58:53 +0000

47 lines

Re: Matters of Public Record

Tim Trent

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 11:56:42 +0000

588 lines

Re: First DP Fines for breaches announced

Watts, Clare (C.)

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 11:47:02 -0000

573 lines

Re: First DP Fines for breaches announced

Bradshaw, Phillip

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 11:44:04 -0000

340 lines

Re: Matters of Public Record

Baines, Jonathan

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 11:41:50 +0000

443 lines

Re: First DP Fines for breaches announced

Sara Owens

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 11:24:31 -0000

586 lines

Matters of Public Record

Tim Trent

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 11:15:11 +0000

171 lines

Re: First DP Fines for breaches announced

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 11:11:37 +0000

881 lines

Re: First DP Fines for breaches announced

Bradshaw, Phillip

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 11:06:11 -0000

781 lines

Re: First DP Fines for breaches announced

Tim Trent

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 10:59:56 +0000

376 lines

Re: First DP Fines for breaches announced

Bradshaw, Phillip

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 10:20:00 -0000

278 lines

Re: First DP Fines for breaches announced

Baines, Jonathan

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 09:55:29 +0000

196 lines

Re: First DP Fines for breaches announced

Bradshaw, Phillip

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 09:42:56 -0000

84 lines

Re: First DP Fines for breaches announced

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 09:23:00 +0000

133 lines

Re: First DP Fines for breaches announced

Bradshaw, Phillip

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 08:59:28 -0000

794 lines

Re: Vetting and Barring Scheme

Roland Perry

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 08:53:14 +0000

37 lines

Vetting and Barring Scheme

Ibrahim Hasan

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 08:40:42 +0000

49 lines

Re: First DP Fines for breaches announced

Chris Spray

Wed, 24 Nov 2010 21:58:56 -0000

523 lines

Re: Redaction and the ability to identify

Bradshaw, Phillip

Wed, 24 Nov 2010 18:34:06 -0000

677 lines

Re: First DP Fines for breaches announced

Baines, Jonathan

Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:45:40 +0000

423 lines

Re: First DP Fines for breaches announced

Tim Trent

Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:37:39 +0000

178 lines

Re: T Mobile s55 prosecutions

Baines, Jonathan

Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:02:36 +0000

107 lines

Re: Redaction and the ability to identify

Samuel Price

Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:52:15 -0000

224 lines

Re: Redaction and the ability to identify

Baines, Jonathan

Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:37:22 +0000

173 lines

Re: Redaction and the ability to identify

Tim Trent

Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:24:32 +0000

305 lines

Redaction and the ability to identify

Donald Henderson

Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:20:05 -0000

92 lines

T Mobile s55 prosecutions

Kevin Broadfoot

Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:21:48 +0000

43 lines

First DP Fines

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:36:43 +0000

48 lines

First DP Fines for breaches announced

Clare Watts

Wed, 24 Nov 2010 07:08:43 +0000

39 lines

Re: Screening companies using publicly available information

Paul Ticher

Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:14:43 -0000

545 lines

Re: Screening companies using publicly available information

Bailey, Trish

Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:01:27 +0000

275 lines

Re: Council loses personal details of children

Baines, Jonathan

Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:06:36 +0000

134 lines

Re: Council loses personal details of children

Baines, Jonathan

Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:58:34 +0000

122 lines

Council loses personal details of children

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:27:00 +0000

52 lines

Data Sharing Code

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:23:39 +0000

55 lines

Right to be Forgotten under DPA

Bailey, Trish

Tue, 23 Nov 2010 09:18:37 +0000

186 lines

Re: Screening companies using publicly available information

Chris Spray

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 22:15:07 -0000

174 lines

Re: Screening companies using publicly available information

Lawrence Serewicz

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 15:04:03 +0000

237 lines

Re: Screening companies using publicly available information

Paul Ticher

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 14:55:56 -0000

158 lines

Re: [UNCLASSIFIED] [data-protection] Whose accessible record ?

Harrison, Iain

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:55:26 +0000

118 lines

Whose accessible record ?

Phil Bradshaw

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:18:09 +0000

50 lines

Re: Screening companies using publicly available information

Lawrence Serewicz

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:15:46 +0000

130 lines

Re: Message from Moderators. No reply to list required.

Tim Trent

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:11:54 +0000

594 lines

Re: Screening companies using publicly available information

Chris Brogan

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:55:15 +0000

332 lines

Re: Message from Moderators. No reply to list required.

Griffiths, Ian

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:54:46 -0000

230 lines

Re: Screening companies using publicly available information

Matt Morrison

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:37:07 +0000

188 lines

Re: Screening companies using publicly available information

Paul Ticher

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:27:06 -0000

139 lines

Content not Method

Ian Welton

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 11:15:18 +0000

78 lines

Re: Screening companies using publicly available information

Baines, Jonathan

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 11:15:02 +0000

760 lines

Re: Screening companies using publicly available information

Lawrence Serewicz

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 10:28:49 +0000

507 lines

Re: Screening companies using publicly available information

Tim Trent

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 09:55:43 +0000

407 lines

Re: Screening companies using publicly available information

Bradshaw, Phillip

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 09:45:11 -0000

594 lines

Re: Screening companies using publicly available information

Tim Trent

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 09:41:57 +0000

408 lines

Re: Screening companies using publicly available information

Marchini, Renzo

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 04:39:49 -0500

215 lines

Re: Screening companies using publicly available information

Matt Morrison

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 09:38:22 +0000

174 lines

Re: Screening companies using publicly available information

Tim Trent

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 09:30:58 +0000

260 lines

Re: Screening companies using publicly available information

Marchini, Renzo

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 04:30:55 -0500

140 lines

Screening companies using publicly available information

Matt Morrison

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 09:05:49 +0000

65 lines

Re: Not For Profit - Food for thought.

Tim Trent

Sun, 21 Nov 2010 16:57:59 +0000

202 lines

Re: Not For Profit - Food for thought.

Ian Welton

Sun, 21 Nov 2010 11:56:05 +0000

159 lines

Re: Not For Profit - Food for thought.

Griffiths, Ian

Sun, 21 Nov 2010 02:45:18 -0000

121 lines

Re: Not For Profit — Food for thought.

Lawrence Serewicz

Sat, 20 Nov 2010 12:47:53 +0000

100 lines

Not For Profit — Food for thought.

Ian Welton

Sat, 20 Nov 2010 11:51:00 +0000

70 lines

Re: It was only a matter of time!

Roland Perry

Sat, 20 Nov 2010 08:53:17 +0000

42 lines

Re: Transferring sick record personal data

Tim Trent

Fri, 19 Nov 2010 17:49:42 +0000

245 lines

Re: Leave your personal data on the doorstep

Tim Trent

Fri, 19 Nov 2010 17:28:19 +0000

359 lines

Re: Message from Moderators. No reply to list required.

Tim Trent

Fri, 19 Nov 2010 17:17:50 +0000

637 lines

Re: Transferring sick record personal data

Ward, Ciaran

Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:12:43 +0000

615 lines

Transferring sick record personal data

Godfrey, Jenny

Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:05:27 -0000

188 lines

Re: Message from Moderators. No reply to list required.

Baines, Jonathan

Fri, 19 Nov 2010 14:09:13 +0000

731 lines

Leave your personal data on the doorstep

Baines, Jonathan

Fri, 19 Nov 2010 14:01:44 +0000

165 lines

Message from Moderators. No reply to list required.

Paul Simpkins

Fri, 19 Nov 2010 13:41:34 -0000

603 lines

Re: It was only a matter of time!

Tim Trent

Fri, 19 Nov 2010 10:34:02 +0000

907 lines

Re: It was only a matter of time!

Ibrahim Hasan

Fri, 19 Nov 2010 08:52:23 +0000

759 lines

Re: It was only a matter of time!

Tim Trent

Thu, 18 Nov 2010 17:33:15 +0000

643 lines

Re: It was only a matter of time!

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 18 Nov 2010 17:16:51 +0000

636 lines

Re: It was only a matter of time!

Tim Trent

Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:33:43 +0000

206 lines

Re: Question DPA s37

Bradshaw, Phillip

Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:02:16 -0000

624 lines

Question DPA s37

Bailey, Trish

Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:55:27 +0000

173 lines

Civil Monetary Penalities - Progress

Bailey, Trish

Thu, 18 Nov 2010 11:43:24 +0000

172 lines

Got this from another list - about airport body scanners.

chris pounder

Wed, 17 Nov 2010 20:18:06 -0000

203 lines

Re: Pooper snoopers

Bradshaw, Phillip

Wed, 17 Nov 2010 16:48:42 -0000

668 lines

It was only a matter of time!

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 17 Nov 2010 09:01:07 +0000

98 lines

Re: Pooper snoopers

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 17 Nov 2010 08:55:04 +0000

352 lines

Database cross-matching

Nic Drew (Cardiff and Vale UHB - IT Security)

Tue, 16 Nov 2010 14:41:44 +0000

311 lines

Government weakens Parliamentary and ICO supervision of the Data Protection Act

chris pounder

Tue, 16 Nov 2010 13:20:09 -0000

274 lines

Message from Moderators

Paul Simpkins

Mon, 15 Nov 2010 22:56:24 -0000

171 lines

Re: Pooper snoopers

Simon Howarth

Mon, 15 Nov 2010 21:20:47 -0000

729 lines

Re: Councils and Planning Information

Lawrence Serewicz

Mon, 15 Nov 2010 13:12:36 +0000

87 lines

Councils and Planning Information

Ibrahim Hasan

Mon, 15 Nov 2010 10:43:37 +0000

44 lines

Re: Facebook

Bradshaw, Phillip

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:24:46 -0000

882 lines

Re: Facebook

Joe Sutton

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:03:59 +0000

842 lines

Re: Facebook

Bradshaw, Phillip

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 15:58:44 -0000

391 lines

Re: Facebook

James Walkom

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 15:40:31 -0000

671 lines

Re: Facebook

Joe Sutton

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 13:16:39 +0000

772 lines

Re: Facebook

James Walkom

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:36:40 -0000

908 lines

Re: Facebook

Dodgson, Paul

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:15:31 +0000

874 lines

Re: Facebook

Jane Holden

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:09:24 -0000

405 lines

Re: Facebook

Tim Trent

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:04:57 +0000

932 lines

FW: [data-protection] Facebook

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:01:05 -0000

316 lines

Re: Facebook

Broom, Doreen

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 11:44:29 +0000

953 lines

Re: Facebook

Joe Sutton

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 11:40:52 +0000

237 lines

Re: Facebook

Dodgson, Paul

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 11:39:46 +0000

840 lines

Re: Facebook

Ben Plouviez

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 11:28:26 -0000

548 lines

Re: Facebook

Tim Trent

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 11:25:09 +0000

378 lines

Re: Facebook

Marchini, Renzo

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 05:56:20 -0500

468 lines

Re: Facebook

Scourfield, Brenda

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 10:52:25 -0000

729 lines

Re: Facebook

Donald Henderson

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 10:51:33 -0000

586 lines

Re: Facebook

Jane Holden

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 10:43:48 -0000

492 lines

Re: Facebook

James Walkom

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 10:37:44 -0000

803 lines

Facebook

Broom, Doreen

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 10:01:53 +0000

268 lines

Re: Consent; Can I consent to data use under one piece of legislation but not another?

Bradshaw, Phillip

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 20:36:33 -0000

202 lines

Re: Views Please

Bradshaw, Phillip

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 20:17:30 -0000

368 lines

Consent; Can I consent to data use under one piece of legislation but not another?

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 19:22:41 +0000

306 lines

Re: Views Please

Tim Trent

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:37:11 +0000

226 lines

Re: Army captain dumps laptop in skip

Tim Trent

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:00:01 +0000

359 lines

Re: Use of tenancy application info - Views Please

Bradshaw, Phillip

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 15:11:43 -0000

130 lines

Re: Use of tenancy application info - Views Please

Giles, Kevin

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 14:45:19 -0000

557 lines

Re: Use of tenancy application info - Views Please

Scourfield, Brenda

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 14:41:59 -0000

161 lines

Re: Use of tenancy application info - Views Please

Dodgson, Paul

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 14:29:20 +0000

73 lines

Use of tenancy application info - Views Please

Jane Holden

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 14:25:02 +0000

38 lines

Army captain dumps laptop in skip

Baines, Jonathan

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 13:31:20 +0000

189 lines

Re: Views Please

Baines, Jonathan

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 13:27:45 +0000

224 lines

Re: Views Please

Piers Margetts

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 13:17:30 -0000

195 lines

Re: Views Please

Bradshaw, Phillip

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 12:24:51 -0000

161 lines

Re: Views Please

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 12:21:02 +0000

85 lines

Views Please

Phil Bradshaw

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 12:17:17 +0000

46 lines

Re: Pooper snoopers

Baines, Jonathan

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 11:07:33 +0000

571 lines

Re: Pooper snoopers

Simon Howarth

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 10:47:33 -0000

372 lines

Pooper snoopers

Ray Cooke

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 09:06:04 +0000

81 lines

Songdo

Mark van Harmelen

Wed, 10 Nov 2010 22:59:43 +0000

79 lines

Calling all Insurance Providers - a question on Electronic Marketing consents

Clare Watts

Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:55:39 +0000

50 lines

Hawktalk: Commissioner plays poker with Google

chris pounder

Tue, 9 Nov 2010 12:12:12 -0000

225 lines

Re: Good News

Tim Trent

Mon, 8 Nov 2010 11:40:16 +0000

318 lines

Re: SAR - Management Planning Exemption

Ward, Ciaran

Mon, 8 Nov 2010 11:25:23 +0000

52 lines

Good News

Ibrahim Hasan

Mon, 8 Nov 2010 11:16:28 +0000

38 lines

Re: A query relating to 'Turnitin' - your comments please?

Bailey, Trish

Mon, 8 Nov 2010 09:00:05 +0000

411 lines

EU proposes online right 'to be forgotten'

Ibrahim Hasan

Sun, 7 Nov 2010 20:15:36 +0000

34 lines

Re: SAR - Management Planning Exemption

Lawrence Serewicz

Sat, 6 Nov 2010 15:43:58 +0000

137 lines

Re: SAR - Management Planning Exemption

Roland Perry

Sat, 6 Nov 2010 10:30:25 +0000

68 lines

Re: SAR - Management Planning Exemption

Bradshaw, Phillip

Sat, 6 Nov 2010 10:10:48 -0000

181 lines

Re: SAR - Management Planning Exemption

Roland Perry

Sat, 6 Nov 2010 09:00:20 +0000

41 lines

Re: A query relating to 'Turnitin' - your comments please?

Roland Perry

Fri, 5 Nov 2010 17:02:11 +0000

43 lines

Re: SAR - Management Planning Exemption

Bradshaw, Phillip

Fri, 5 Nov 2010 16:57:48 -0000

621 lines

SAR - Management Planning Exemption

Ward, Ciaran

Fri, 5 Nov 2010 16:41:59 +0000

311 lines

Re: International Transfer

Ibrahim Hasan

Fri, 5 Nov 2010 15:55:31 +0000

30 lines

A query relating to 'Turnitin' - your comments please?

Barlow, Jackie

Fri, 5 Nov 2010 13:38:12 -0000

276 lines

Re: Chill Out - Find Love

Paul Ticher

Fri, 5 Nov 2010 12:12:08 -0000

246 lines

Re: list etiquette (relates to former thread 'Hmm')

Tim Trent

Fri, 5 Nov 2010 12:01:51 +0000

368 lines

Re: Chill Out - Find Love

Baines, Jonathan

Fri, 5 Nov 2010 11:40:10 +0000

174 lines

list etiquette (relates to former thread 'Hmm')

Mark van Harmelen

Fri, 5 Nov 2010 11:39:48 +0000

180 lines

Re: To listen or not to listen, that is the evidential question

Tim Trent

Fri, 5 Nov 2010 11:24:11 +0000

241 lines

Re: To listen or not to listen, that is the evidential question

Tim Trent

Fri, 5 Nov 2010 11:10:25 +0000

206 lines

Re: To listen or not to listen, that is the evidential question

Bradshaw, Phillip

Fri, 5 Nov 2010 11:04:00 -0000

759 lines

Re: International Transfer

Ray Cooke

Fri, 5 Nov 2010 10:55:35 +0000

183 lines

Re: To listen or not to listen, that is the evidential question

Baines, Jonathan

Fri, 5 Nov 2010 10:50:31 +0000

452 lines

Re: Chill Out - Find Love

Lawrence Serewicz

Fri, 5 Nov 2010 10:50:06 +0000

90 lines

Chill Out - Find Love

Ibrahim Hasan

Fri, 5 Nov 2010 10:04:07 +0000

36 lines

ICO warns councils

Ibrahim Hasan

Fri, 5 Nov 2010 09:13:57 +0000

41 lines

International Transfer

Ibrahim Hasan

Fri, 5 Nov 2010 08:50:42 +0000

40 lines

Re: To listen or not to listen, that is the evidential question

Lynn Wyeth

Fri, 5 Nov 2010 08:15:25 +0000

28 lines

To listen or not to listen, that is the evidential question

Tim Trent

Thu, 4 Nov 2010 21:01:28 +0000

186 lines

Re: Access to medical records without consent

Tim Trent

Thu, 4 Nov 2010 17:27:18 +0000

402 lines

Re: detailed DP analysis available

Andrew Cormack

Thu, 4 Nov 2010 15:44:00 +0000

92 lines

New OSC Procedures and Guidance and Document

Ibrahim Hasan

Thu, 4 Nov 2010 14:48:15 +0000

60 lines

Re: Study of nursery children

Simon Howarth

Thu, 4 Nov 2010 14:26:00 -0000

756 lines

Re: Access to medical records without consent

Bradshaw, Phillip

Thu, 4 Nov 2010 12:16:20 -0000

411 lines

Re: Access to medical records without consent

Ward, Ciaran

Thu, 4 Nov 2010 12:15:11 +0000

644 lines

Re: Access to medical records without consent

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 4 Nov 2010 11:59:24 +0000

507 lines

Access to medical records without consent

Godfrey, Jenny

Thu, 4 Nov 2010 11:53:45 -0000

190 lines

Re: Study of nursery children

Chris Spray

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 22:47:45 -0000

341 lines

Re: Parking Tickets (PCNs) - Exemtions under DP?

Chris Spray

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 21:23:49 -0000

309 lines

Re: Parking Tickets (PCNs) - Exemtions under DP?

Griffiths, Ian

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 16:09:11 -0000

37 lines

Re: Advert??

Griffiths, Ian

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 16:06:41 -0000

242 lines

Re: Parking Tickets (PCNs) - Exemtions under DP?

Roland Perry

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 16:01:14 +0000

39 lines

Re: Parking Tickets (PCNs) - Exemtions under DP?

Roland Perry

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 15:58:31 +0000

38 lines

Advert??

Ian Welton

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 15:58:09 +0000

263 lines

Re: Parking Tickets (PCNs) - Exemtions under DP?

Alan Stead

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 14:36:58 +0000

97 lines

Re: Study of nursery children

Ian Barker

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 14:19:02 +0000

54 lines

Re: Parking Tickets (PCNs) - Exemtions under DP?

Lynn Wyeth

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 14:12:14 +0000

47 lines

Re: Google Street View

Tim Trent

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 14:07:31 +0000

38 lines

Re: Advert??

Tim Trent

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 14:05:15 +0000

391 lines

Re: Parking Tickets (PCNs) - Exemtions under DP?

Baines, Jonathan

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 13:20:42 +0000

140 lines

Re: Parking Tickets (PCNs) - Exemtions under DP?

Bradshaw, Phillip

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 13:10:45 -0000

149 lines

Re: Study of nursery children

Bradshaw, Phillip

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 13:04:31 -0000

783 lines

Parking Tickets (PCNs) - Exemtions under DP?

Lynn Wyeth

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 12:55:58 +0000

65 lines

Re: Study of nursery children

Giles, Kevin

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 12:47:58 -0000

593 lines

Re: Parking Tickets (PCNs) - Exemtions under DP?

Bradshaw, Phillip

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 12:40:06 -0000

294 lines

Re: Parking Tickets (PCNs) - Exemptions under D P?

Wilson, Stephen

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 12:38:28 -0000

185 lines

Re: Parking Tickets (PCNs) - Exemptions under DP?

Bradshaw, Phillip

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 12:37:03 -0000

136 lines

detailed DP analysis available

chris pounder

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 12:30:31 -0000

314 lines

Re: Parking Tickets (PCNs) - Exemptions under D P?

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 12:24:40 -0000

116 lines

Re: Parking Tickets (PCNs) - Exemtions under DP?

Baines, Jonathan

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 12:20:50 +0000

234 lines

Study of nursery children

Wendy Evans

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 12:20:41 +0000

52 lines

Re: Parking Tickets (PCNs) - Exemptions under DP?

Lynn Wyeth

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 12:13:12 +0000

48 lines

Re: Parking Tickets (PCNs) - Exemptions under DP?

David Wilson

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 12:04:08 +0000

62 lines

Re: Parking Tickets (PCNs) - Exemtions under DP?

Bradshaw, Phillip

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 12:00:24 -0000

158 lines

Google Street View

Kevin Broadfoot

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 11:53:33 +0000

38 lines

Parking Tickets (PCNs) - Exemtions under DP?

Lynn Wyeth

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 11:52:39 +0000

75 lines

Re: Advert??

Griffiths, Ian

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 11:40:35 -0000

134 lines

Re: Advert??

Tim Trent

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 11:33:22 +0000

193 lines

Re: Google Street View

Robert (Bob) Waixel

Tue, 2 Nov 2010 19:49:31 +0000

123 lines

New Data Mediation Service

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 2 Nov 2010 14:40:28 +0000

44 lines

Re: Google Street View

Tim Trent

Tue, 2 Nov 2010 12:42:08 +0000

152 lines

Google Street View

Ray Cooke

Tue, 2 Nov 2010 12:32:41 +0000

106 lines

ADV - RIPA Forms Guidace Manual

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 2 Nov 2010 09:54:48 +0000

67 lines

Spy Barbie

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 2 Nov 2010 08:58:48 +0000

38 lines

Re: [Off Topic] I think it's time to go quietly :)

Paul Ticher

Mon, 1 Nov 2010 18:24:05 -0000

242 lines

Re: [Off Topic] I think it's time to go quietly :)

Simon Howarth

Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:55:40 -0000

792 lines

Re: Access to children's data

Broom, Doreen

Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:42:21 +0000

144 lines

Fount vs font (meant the former not the latter)

Lawrence Serewicz

Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:26:31 +0000

935 lines

Re: [Off Topic] I think it's time to go quietly :)

Lawrence Serewicz

Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:23:36 +0000

708 lines

[Off Topic] I think it's time to go quietly :)

Tim Trent

Mon, 1 Nov 2010 15:31:19 +0000

256 lines

Re: Access to children's data

Simon Howarth

Mon, 1 Nov 2010 14:21:06 -0000

132 lines

Re: Access to children's data

Tim Turner

Mon, 1 Nov 2010 14:11:02 -0000

105 lines

Re: Access to children's data

Paul Ticher

Mon, 1 Nov 2010 11:36:00 -0000

79 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager