JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB Archives

CCP4BB Archives


October 2010


View:

Show Author | Hide Author

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject

From

Date Sorted by Date, Most Recent First

Size

Re: Strange spots

Colin Nave

Sun, 31 Oct 2010 16:41:15 -0000

130 lines

Re: Strange spots

John R Helliwell

Sun, 31 Oct 2010 12:46:56 +0000

110 lines

Re: How to get PDB of small molecule which is not available in data base..??

Miri Hirshberg

Sun, 31 Oct 2010 08:46:20 +0000

27 lines

Re: DNA-protein complex.

Poul Nissen

Sun, 31 Oct 2010 08:58:29 +0100

98 lines

DNA-protein complex.

dengzq1987

Sun, 31 Oct 2010 15:06:19 +0800

58 lines

Re: How to get PDB of small molecule which is not available in data base..??

Jürgen Bosch

Sun, 31 Oct 2010 02:23:22 -0400

77 lines

How to get PDB of small molecule which is not available in data base..??

Hussain Bhukyagps

Sun, 31 Oct 2010 11:43:10 +0530

30 lines

Re: DLS

Anastassis Perrakis

Sat, 30 Oct 2010 21:00:22 +0200

182 lines

Re: DLS

Artem Evdokimov

Sat, 30 Oct 2010 13:10:50 -0500

81 lines

Re: DLS

Jürgen Bosch

Sat, 30 Oct 2010 13:23:59 -0400

118 lines

Re: DLS

Debasish Chattopadhyay

Sat, 30 Oct 2010 12:09:54 -0500

44 lines

Re: Free R with doubled cell edge

Ethan Merritt

Sat, 30 Oct 2010 10:08:43 -0700

189 lines

Re: Strange spots

Jürgen Bosch

Sat, 30 Oct 2010 12:06:11 -0400

7069 lines

Re: DLS

Van Den Berg, Bert

Sat, 30 Oct 2010 10:56:31 -0400

103 lines

Re: Free R with doubled cell edge

Boaz Shaanan

Sat, 30 Oct 2010 14:49:40 GMT

358 lines

Re: Free R with doubled cell edge

Kay Diederichs

Sat, 30 Oct 2010 14:22:36 +0200

229 lines

Re: Help with model bias in merihedral twin + Refmac5

Colin Nave

Sat, 30 Oct 2010 11:34:47 +0100

455 lines

Re: Strange spots

Felix Frolow

Sat, 30 Oct 2010 10:31:41 +0200

70 lines

Re: Strange spots

John R Helliwell

Sat, 30 Oct 2010 09:16:35 +0100

4273 lines

Re: Strange spots - In book of John Helliwell

Felix Frolow

Sat, 30 Oct 2010 09:58:19 +0200

627 lines

DLS

Mohd Shukuri Mohamad Ali

Sat, 30 Oct 2010 12:02:41 +0800

20 lines

Re: resolution limit stuck in Refmac5

Nat Echols

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:56:05 -0700

87 lines

resolution limit stuck in Refmac5

Tom Huxford

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:46:45 -0700

50 lines

Re: Strange spots

Edward Snell

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 20:23:09 -0400

249 lines

Re: Strange spots

James Holton

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:03:42 -0700

97 lines

Re: Strange spots

Julian Nomme

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:30:45 -0500

210 lines

Re: Strange spots

Jim Pflugrath

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:13:22 -0500

15 lines

Re: Strange spots

Bart Hazes

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:05:33 -0600

67 lines

Re: Strange spots

Charles W. Carter, Jr

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 23:23:32 +0200

1297 lines

Re: Strange spots

Konstantin v. Korotkov

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:17:29 -0700

9748 lines

Re: Strange spots

Gerard Bricogne

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 22:03:12 +0100

172 lines

Re: Strange spots

Bryan Lepore

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:55:09 -0400

23 lines

Re: Strange spots

Van Den Berg, Bert

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:37:03 -0400

82 lines

Re: Strange spots

Ethan Merritt

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:25:15 -0700

35 lines

Re: Strange spots

Leiman Petr

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 20:14:08 +0000

37 lines

Re: Strange spots

<>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 21:13:27 +0100

164 lines

Re: Strange spots

Jacob Keller

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:13:12 -0500

678 lines

Re: Strange spots

Sanishvili, Ruslan

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:08:51 -0500

714 lines

Re: Strange spots

Jacob Keller

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:59:40 -0500

368 lines

Re: Strange spots

Marcus Winter

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:56:28 -0600

305 lines

Which version CCP4 output DFc colume in SIGMAA?

Hailiang Zhang

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:56:07 -0400

17 lines

Re: Strange spots

Soisson, Stephen M

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:49:41 -0400

148 lines

Re: Strange spots

Julian Nomme

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:10:15 -0500

93 lines

Re: Strange spots

Jrh

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:01:48 +0100

82 lines

Re: Help with model bias in merihedral twin + Refmac5

Peter Chan

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:59:28 -0400

455 lines

Re: Strange spots

Gerard Bricogne

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 18:44:43 +0100

72 lines

Re: Strange spots

John R Helliwell

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 18:41:51 +0100

45 lines

Re: Bug in c_truncate?

Peter Chan

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:36:02 -0400

69 lines

Strange spots

David Goldstone

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:08:15 +0100

9737 lines

Re: Real space refinement [was: Against Method (R)]

Pavel Afonine

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:57:37 -0700

73 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Bart Hazes

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 09:31:16 -0600

182 lines

Re: Bug in c_truncate?

<>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:21:42 +0200

212 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Dirk Kostrewa

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:26:03 +0200

238 lines

Re: Bug in c_truncate?

Robbie Joosten

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:54:50 +0200

220 lines

Re: Bug in c_truncate?

Phil Evans

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:05:40 +0100

194 lines

Re: Bug in c_truncate?

<>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:01:06 +0200

177 lines

Re: Bug in c_truncate?

George M. Sheldrick

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:30:01 +0200

129 lines

Re: Bug in c_truncate?

Tim Gruene

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:46:34 +0200

152 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

George M. Sheldrick

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:41:09 +0200

210 lines

Position as Postdoctoral Research Fellow - in membrane proteins structural biology , Oslo Norway

Preben Morth

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:37:45 +0200

556 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Dirk Kostrewa

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 09:50:32 +0200

328 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Robbie Joosten

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:03:10 +0200

200 lines

POST-DOCTORAL POSITION in STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY

Thirumananseri Kumarevel

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 03:24:24 +0100

23 lines

Post-Doctoral Position in Structural Biology

Thirumananseri Kumarevel

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 11:14:45 +0900

265 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Mischa Machius

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 20:59:39 -0400

161 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Jim Pflugrath

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 19:56:57 -0500

72 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Zbyszek Otwinowski

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 19:40:51 -0500

1689 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Bart Hazes

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:32:04 -0600

67 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Bart Hazes

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:15:08 -0600

365 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Ethan Merritt

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:09:00 -0700

201 lines

Re: oligomer ligand building

Garib N Murshudov

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 23:02:59 +0100

98 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

James Holton

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:56:44 -0700

573 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Jacob Keller

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:49:11 -0500

613 lines

Re: oligomer ligand building

Paul Emsley

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 22:31:16 +0100

34 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Bart Hazes

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:13:43 -0600

277 lines

Re: Babinet solvent correction [WAS: R-free flag problem]

Tim Fenn

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 13:33:14 -0700

62 lines

Re: Help with Optimizing Crystals

Matthew Bratkowski

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:31:52 -0400

466 lines

Re: oligomer ligand building

Paul Holland

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 20:53:28 +0100

25 lines

oligomer ligand building

Changyi Xue

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:12:29 -0400

68 lines

Free R with doubled cell edge

Thomas Edwards

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 18:50:07 +0100

88 lines

Re: Bug in c_truncate?

Martyn Winn

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 18:37:50 +0100

123 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

James Holton

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:33:12 -0700

386 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.)

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:21:24 -0700

158 lines

Re: Bug in c_truncate?

Phil Evans

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:55:35 +0100

112 lines

Re: Bug in c_truncate?

Peter Chan

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 12:48:14 -0400

183 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Jacob Keller

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:04:28 -0500

136 lines

Re: Additional band on gel due to his-tag: any references?

Daniel Bonsor

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:18:51 +0100

24 lines

Re: Additional band on gel due to his-tag: any references?

Artem Evdokimov

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:09:23 -0500

129 lines

Re: Additional band on gel due to his-tag: any references?

Sebastiaan Werten

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:03:29 +0200

180 lines

Re: Babinet solvent correction [WAS: R-free flag problem]

Dirk Kostrewa

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:56:42 +0200

283 lines

Re: Additional band on gel due to his-tag: any references?

Van Den Berg, Bert

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:55:00 -0400

124 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

George M. Sheldrick

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:50:31 +0200

111 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Ed Pozharski

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:48:21 -0400

106 lines

Re: Bug in c_truncate?

Tim Gruene

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:29:31 +0200

110 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Simon Kolstoe

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:26:39 +0100

173 lines

Re: Additional band on gel due to his-tag: any references?

Jan Schoepe

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:21:37 +0100

307 lines

Re: Bug in c_truncate?

Peter Chan

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:21:20 -0400

152 lines

Re: Additional band on gel due to his-tag: any references?

Skrzypczak-Jankun, Ewa

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:09:37 -0400

571 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Jacob Keller

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 08:00:17 -0500

93 lines

Re: Additional band on gel due to his-tag: any references?

Tim Gruene

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 13:51:19 +0200

86 lines

Re: Bug in c_truncate?

Tim Gruene

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 13:41:11 +0200

76 lines

Additional band on gel due to his-tag: any references?

Sebastiaan Werten

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 13:16:59 +0200

34 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Vellieux Frederic

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:30:54 +0200

40 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Eleanor Dodson

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:28:49 +0100

133 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

George M. Sheldrick

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:05:52 +0200

60 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree) [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

DUFF, Anthony

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 19:52:13 +1100

570 lines

Postdoctotal Position in Barcelona (erratum)

"F.Xavier Gomis-Rüth"

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:46:14 +0200

1351 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Artem Evdokimov

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 21:12:24 -0500

59 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Dima Klenchin

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 20:58:35 -0500

35 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.)

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:22:28 -0700

233 lines

Bug in c_truncate?

Peter Chan

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 21:14:36 -0400

57 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Jacob Keller

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 20:01:55 -0500

190 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Phoebe Rice

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 17:50:39 -0500

168 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.)

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:13:03 -0700

149 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.)

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:11:06 -0700

184 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.)

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:02:52 -0700

316 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Nat Echols

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:40:00 -0700

56 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.)

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:22:44 -0700

445 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Ed Pozharski

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 17:20:40 -0400

167 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

VAN RAAIJ , MARK JOHAN

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 22:56:55 +0200

317 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree) - Problems with Publishing

Felix Frolow

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 22:53:49 +0200

2828 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Simon Kolstoe

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 21:01:27 +0100

136 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.)

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 12:11:36 -0700

96 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Ethan A Merritt

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 10:44:21 -0700

64 lines

Re: Hardware question

Peter Keller

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 17:45:28 +0100

107 lines

Postdoctoral Position in Barcelona

"F.Xavier Gomis-Rüth"

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:33:32 +0200

1340 lines

Re: Hardware question

James Holton

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:25:47 -0700

67 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Ed Pozharski

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 10:34:26 -0400

35 lines

Re: Help with Optimizing Crystals

Annie Hassell

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 08:28:24 -0500

446 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Jürgen Bosch

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:04:51 -0400

86 lines

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Ian Tickle

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 12:22:14 +0100

241 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Frank von Delft

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:56:36 +0100

60 lines

Re: Hardware question

Frank von Delft

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:43:17 +0100

39 lines

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree

Clemens Vonrhein

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:38:13 +0100

94 lines

Postdoctoral position in Toulouse, France

Jean-Denis PEDELACQ

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 10:29:09 +0200

34 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree) [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

DUFF, Anthony

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:43:16 +1100

81 lines

Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Robbie Joosten

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:29:06 +0200

54 lines

Re: Hardware question

Jürgen Bosch

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 22:48:04 -0400

103 lines

Re: Hardware question

Ben Eisenbraun

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 22:26:20 -0400

60 lines

Re: Hardware question

Jim Fairman

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 22:14:53 -0400

98 lines

Hardware question

Edward A. Berry

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:52:51 -0400

25 lines

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

DUFF, Anthony

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 12:28:33 +1100

1416 lines

Help with model bias in merihedral twin

Peter Chan

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:00:28 -0400

123 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

James Holton

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:15:16 -0700

126 lines

Re: Help with Optimizing Crystals

James Holton

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:46:56 -0700

141 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Jacob Keller

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:45:32 -0500

86 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Ethan Merritt

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:45:28 -0700

313 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

James Holton

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:31:24 -0700

566 lines

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree

Maia Cherney

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:21:36 -0600

63 lines

Re: Help with Optimizing Crystals

Jürgen Bosch

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:45:50 -0400

128 lines

Re: Help with Optimizing Crystals

Matthew Bratkowski

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:31:39 -0400

81 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Ethan Merritt

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:59:34 -0700

223 lines

Re: Help with Optimizing Crystals

Jacob Keller

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:50:55 -0500

268 lines

Re: Help with Optimizing Crystals

Jürgen Bosch

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:47:51 -0400

143 lines

Re: Help with Optimizing Crystals

Artem Evdokimov

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:31:29 -0500

102 lines

Re: Help with Optimizing Crystals

Van Den Berg, Bert

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:30:41 -0400

125 lines

Help with Optimizing Crystals

Matthew Bratkowski

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:23:23 -0400

66 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Frank von Delft

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:16:58 +0100

199 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Ian Tickle

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 20:44:14 +0100

173 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.)

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:53:05 -0700

28 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Gerard Bricogne

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 19:41:15 +0100

159 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Phoebe Rice

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:30:11 -0500

89 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Ethan Merritt

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:28:06 -0700

124 lines

Against Method (R)

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.)

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:46:46 -0700

95 lines

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree

Ian Tickle

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:15:50 +0100

55 lines

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree

Frank von Delft

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:07:18 +0100

39 lines

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree

Clemens Vonrhein

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:51:59 +0100

1395 lines

Re: Fill map/mask with dummy atoms?

Anastassis Perrakis

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:32:45 +0200

243 lines

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree

Ian Tickle

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:00:34 +0100

50 lines

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Ian Tickle

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:52:38 +0100

175 lines

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree

Ed Pozharski

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:37:01 -0400

35 lines

Re: rigorously compatible coordinate files

Eleanor Dodson

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:26:17 +0100

24 lines

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree

Eleanor Dodson

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:20:53 +0100

50 lines

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree

Ian Tickle

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:06:16 +0100

93 lines

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree

Tom Oldfield

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:04:57 +0100

41 lines

Re: Babinet solvent correction / comment for imperfect models

Alexandre OURJOUMTSEV

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 07:38:33 +0000

180 lines

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree

Alexandre OURJOUMTSEV

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 07:16:31 +0000

222 lines

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.)

Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:38:56 -0700

160 lines

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

DUFF, Anthony

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:33:47 +1100

538 lines

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree

Artem Evdokimov

Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:45:06 -0500

154 lines

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.)

Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:07:02 -0700

159 lines

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree

Artem Evdokimov

Mon, 25 Oct 2010 20:36:18 -0500

60 lines

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree

Ethan Merritt

Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:54:46 -0700

40 lines

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree

Maia Cherney

Mon, 25 Oct 2010 16:16:28 -0600

16 lines

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree

Jacqueline Vitali

Mon, 25 Oct 2010 17:44:31 -0400

66 lines

diverging Rcryst and Rfree

Rakesh Joshi

Mon, 25 Oct 2010 17:10:06 -0400

17 lines

Fill map/mask with dummy atoms?

Pavel Afonine

Mon, 25 Oct 2010 12:16:17 -0700

158 lines

message for CCP4bb

Frank Kozielski

Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:43:55 +0100

159 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Eleanor Dodson

Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:04:15 +0100

115 lines

FW: [ccp4bb] Babinet solvent correction [WAS: R-free flag problem]

Simon Phillips

Mon, 25 Oct 2010 09:09:52 +0100

454 lines

Re: [OT]:Android

Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve

Sun, 24 Oct 2010 22:43:37 -0700

24 lines

[OT]:Android

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.)

Sun, 24 Oct 2010 18:41:09 -0700

48 lines

Re: FOM: Phaser vs SigmaA

Randy J. Read

Sun, 24 Oct 2010 00:21:26 +0100

52 lines

Re: Babinet solvent correction [WAS: R-free flag problem]

Tim Fenn

Sat, 23 Oct 2010 13:14:16 -0700

91 lines

Re: Babinet solvent correction [WAS: R-free flag problem]

Pavel Afonine

Sat, 23 Oct 2010 10:05:15 -0700

97 lines

Re: Babinet solvent correction [WAS: R-free flag problem]

Tim Fenn

Sat, 23 Oct 2010 01:29:46 -0700

95 lines

Re: R-free flag problem

Vinson LIANG

Sat, 23 Oct 2010 11:55:14 +0800

193 lines

Re: Babinet solvent correction [WAS: R-free flag problem]

Pavel Afonine

Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:53:32 -0700

64 lines

RE : [ccp4bb] Babinet solvent correction [WAS: R-free flag problem]

Alexandre OURJOUMTSEV

Fri, 22 Oct 2010 22:04:46 +0000

30 lines

Re: Babinet solvent correction [WAS: R-free flag problem]

Ethan Merritt

Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:38:07 -0700

86 lines

Re: Babinet solvent correction [WAS: R-free flag problem]

Pavel Afonine

Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:17:53 -0700

98 lines

AKTA FPLC system available [off-topic]

Erin A. Curry

Fri, 22 Oct 2010 19:12:52 +0100

17 lines

Babinet solvent correction [WAS: R-free flag problem]

Ed Pozharski

Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:01:49 -0400

26 lines

Diamond MX BAG Training

James Nicholson

Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:29:37 +0100

380 lines

Re: R-free flag problem

Ed Pozharski

Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:07:48 -0400

144 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Pal M.

Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:16:08 +0100

150 lines

coot-0.5.2-osx-universal.dmg.gz

Jeroen Mesters

Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:14:33 +0200

15 lines

Re: R-free flag problem

Tim Gruene

Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:37:13 +0200

155 lines

Re: R-free flag problem

Vinson LIANG

Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:33:03 +0800

140 lines

Re: update--degradation of MBP fusion protein

Ho Leung Ng

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:06:53 -0700

19 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Phil Evans

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 21:45:34 +0100

130 lines

Re: **Possible spam**cryoprotetant for 35% Dioxane

Prince, D Bryan

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:34:27 -0400

424 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Ethan Merritt

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:03:21 -0700

93 lines

Re: **Possible spam**cryoprotetant for 35% Dioxane

<>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:48:00 -0400

210 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Ian Tickle

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 20:43:31 +0100

163 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Ian Tickle

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 20:00:38 +0100

111 lines

Re: FOM: Phaser vs SigmaA

Goragot Wisedchaisri

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:43:03 -0700

87 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Jacob Keller

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:38:55 -0500

60 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Clemens Vonrhein

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:24:57 +0100

44 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Ed Pozharski

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:19:34 -0400

63 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Clemens Vonrhein

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:19:05 +0100

69 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Ed Pozharski

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:10:59 -0400

25 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Clemens Vonrhein

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 18:59:49 +0100

74 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Jacob Keller

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:58:37 -0500

41 lines

Re: tlsanl *NOW ALSO REFMAC* and phenix TLS results

Ian Tickle

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 18:27:24 +0100

64 lines

Re: **Possible spam**cryoprotetant for 35% Dioxane

Jürgen Bosch

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:17:07 -0400

211 lines

Re: **Possible spam**cryoprotetant for 35% Dioxane

Edward Snell

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:07:04 -0400

103 lines

Fwd: [ccp4bb] tlsanl *NOW ALSO REFMAC* and phenix TLS results

Bryan Lepore

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:00:59 -0400

22 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Ed Pozharski

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:57:33 -0400

141 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Ethan Merritt

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:53:00 -0700

112 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Ronald E Stenkamp

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:51:50 -0700

150 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Jacob Keller

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:34:58 -0500

305 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Ed Pozharski

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:18:31 -0400

100 lines

Re: **Possible spam**cryoprotetant for 35% Dioxane

Eric Larson

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:13:49 -0700

70 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Clemens Vonrhein

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:57:19 +0100

68 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

James Holton

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 08:55:45 -0700

191 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Christina Bourne

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 08:46:23 -0700

80 lines

Re: tlsanl *NOW ALSO REFMAC* and phenix TLS results

Ian Tickle

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:42:10 +0100

85 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Clemens Vonrhein

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:36:51 +0100

50 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

<>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:31:51 +0200

100 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Ed Pozharski

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:04:36 -0400

52 lines

Re: tlsanl *NOW ALSO REFMAC* and phenix TLS results

Bryan Lepore

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:55:38 -0400

46 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Harry Powell

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:28:10 +0000

74 lines

Re: tlsanl and phenix TLS results

Ian Tickle

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:01:35 +0100

54 lines

tlsanl and phenix TLS results

Bryan Lepore

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 08:26:38 -0400

34 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Vellieux Frederic

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:12:26 +0200

47 lines

Regarding space group P1, P21

Mohinder Pal

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:05:42 +0100

38 lines

Re: FOM: Phaser vs SigmaA

Clemens Vonrhein

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:01:00 +0100

73 lines

Biological Structures Group BCA Winter Meeting - Wed 15th December, University of Reading - REGISTRATION NOW OPEN!

Kimberly Ann Watson

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:39:03 +0100

194 lines

Re: FOM: Phaser vs SigmaA

Eleanor Dodson

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:51:43 +0100

29 lines

Re: refining structures with engineered disulfide bonds

Eleanor Dodson

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:48:51 +0100

44 lines

Re: R-free flag problem.

Tim Gruene

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:41:30 +0200

96 lines

cryoprotetant for 35% Dioxane

Enrico Stura

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:31:42 +0200

43 lines

Re: molecule on symmetry axis

Jacqueline Vitali

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 02:26:24 -0400

38 lines

R-free flag problem.

Vinson LIANG

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:50:04 +0800

64 lines

update--degradation of MBP fusion protein

Jerry McCully

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 17:12:34 -0700

77 lines

**Possible spam**cryoprotetant for 35% Dioxane

Jerry McCully

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 17:00:51 -0700

59 lines

FOM: Phaser vs SigmaA

Goragot Wisedchaisri

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 16:58:34 -0700

19 lines

Re: refining structures with engineered disulfide bonds

Bart Hazes

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:50:24 -0600

148 lines

Re: refining structures with engineered disulfide bonds

Frederic VELLIEUX

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 23:34:08 +0200

101 lines

refining structures with engineered disulfide bonds

Seema Mittal

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:40:42 -0400

81 lines

Re: what package provides libg2c.so.0 on Ubuntu ? - solved

Stephen Weeks

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 21:15:37 +0200

206 lines

Re: what package provides libg2c.so.0 on Ubuntu ? - solved

Edward A. Berry

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:04:41 -0400

73 lines

Re: Cys auxotroph

Paula Salgado

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:00:45 +0100

165 lines

Re: what package provides libg2c.so.0 on Ubuntu ?

Tim Gruene

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:26:49 +0200

91 lines

Re: what package provides libg2c.so.0 on Ubuntu ?

Leiman Petr

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:13:09 +0000

56 lines

Re: what package provides libg2c.so.0 on Ubuntu ?

Tim Gruene

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:59:44 +0200

89 lines

Re: Refinement

Eleanor Dodson

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:56:32 +0100

40 lines

Re: deposition related question

Tim Gruene

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:54:31 +0200

73 lines

Re: what package provides libg2c.so.0 on Ubuntu ?

Vellieux Frederic

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:07:07 +0200

60 lines

deposition related question

Sudhir Kumar

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:09:07 +0530

26 lines

Re: what package provides libg2c.so.0 on Ubuntu ?

Francois Berenger

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:26:44 +0900

36 lines

what package provides libg2c.so.0 on Ubuntu ?

Edward A. Berry

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 00:05:32 -0400

27 lines

Re: help with pymol error message

Phoebe Rice

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 17:40:13 -0500

76 lines

Re: help with pymol error message

Jason Vertrees

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 18:16:41 -0400

108 lines

help with pymol error message

Rakesh Joshi

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 17:56:58 -0400

57 lines

Re: Cys auxotroph

Paula Salgado

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:04:13 +0100

70 lines

Re: JAC (2010), 43,1242-1249

Jürgen Bosch

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 11:39:17 -0400

251 lines

Re: JAC (2010), 43,1242-1249

Michel Fodje

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 09:33:01 -0600

293 lines

Re: Reg. PATCH-ERR in CNS

<>

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 16:00:06 +0200

495 lines

Reg. PATCH-ERR in CNS

Thangavelu K

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 18:44:55 +0800

378 lines

Re: Refinement

Vellieux Frederic

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 09:15:16 +0200

54 lines

Re: Milch and Minor

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.)

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:51:44 -0700

42 lines

JAC (2010), 43,1242-1249

Jürgen Bosch

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 22:34:28 -0400

62 lines

Re: Milch and Minor

Jürgen Bosch

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 22:24:11 -0400

127 lines

Re: Milch and Minor

Thomas Juettemann

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:15:47 -0700

39 lines

Milch and Minor

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.)

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:05:06 -0700

32 lines

Re: Refinement

Jim Fairman

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 21:36:29 -0400

81 lines

Re: Refinement

Jürgen Bosch

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 20:46:18 -0400

134 lines

Refinement

Jyotica Batra

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 00:39:26 +0100

26 lines

Positions available

Chavas Leo

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 06:36:24 +0900

40 lines

Re: Cys auxotroph

M T

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 22:01:12 +0200

57 lines

Positions available

Leo Chavas

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 04:39:29 +0900

74 lines

Positions available

naalas horced

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 04:33:03 +0900

74 lines

Takeda San Diego, Scientist, Membrane Protein Chemistry

Tatone, Josephine (TPNA)

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:58:04 -0500

56 lines

CNIO International PhD and Postdoctoral Programmes_2011 call

Marco Mazzorana

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:03:27 +0200

300 lines

Re: Cys auxotroph

Daniel Bonsor

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 16:27:13 +0100

19 lines

Cys auxotroph

Yogesh Gupta

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:05:06 -0400

48 lines

Re: Big difference between anomalous map and density modification map

Clemens Vonrhein

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:29:43 +0100

83 lines

Lousy diffraction at home but fantastic at the synchrotron?

Marcus Winter

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 07:41:44 -0600

979 lines

Re: Big difference between anomalous map and density modification map

Wu, Mousheng

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 08:33:47 -0500

166 lines

Re: Big difference between anomalous map and density modification map

Clemens Vonrhein

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:05:24 +0100

118 lines

Re: Big difference between anomalous map and density modification map

David Schuller

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 08:47:49 -0400

51 lines

Re: Question regarding S-SAD

Clemens Vonrhein

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:28:03 +0100

93 lines

Re: Question regarding S-SAD

Dirk Kostrewa

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:11:51 +0200

75 lines

Question regarding S-SAD

Kornelius Zeth

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:03:53 +0200

29 lines

Re: Pseudo-symmetry/refinement

Esko Oksanen

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:02:03 +0200

38 lines

Re: que fem sobre això miquel? es veu que l'Esther Cid en el seu dia ja ho va enviar.

Esther Fernandez

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:20:11 +0200

223 lines

Re: crystal growth

Enrico Stura

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:15:45 +0200

40 lines

Re: Reindexing scaled data

Eleanor Dodson

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 10:12:12 +0100

75 lines

Re: Big difference between anomalous map and density modification map

Eleanor Dodson

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 10:09:04 +0100

48 lines

Re: Pseudo-symmetry/refinement

Eleanor Dodson

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 10:05:54 +0100

39 lines

Re: Fill map/mask with dummy atoms?

Dirk Kostrewa

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 10:53:12 +0200

70 lines

Positions available at the High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) - Japan

naalas horced

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:23:49 +0900

68 lines

Re: peculiar twinning case

Gerard Bricogne

Sun, 17 Oct 2010 22:55:53 +0100

98 lines

Re: Reindexing scaled data

Ethan Merritt

Sun, 17 Oct 2010 12:46:07 -0700

43 lines

Re: Reindexing scaled data

Jürgen Bosch

Sun, 17 Oct 2010 15:45:09 -0400

118 lines

Reindexing scaled data

Daniel Bonsor

Sun, 17 Oct 2010 20:34:44 +0100

31 lines

Big difference between anomalous map and density modification map

Wu, Mousheng

Sun, 17 Oct 2010 14:29:12 -0500

36 lines

Re: Pseudo-symmetry/refinement

Seema Nath

Sun, 17 Oct 2010 18:23:27 +0100

15 lines

coot color question

Hailiang Zhang

Sun, 17 Oct 2010 13:22:27 -0400

17 lines

Re: Pseudo-symmetry/refinement

Esko Oksanen

Sun, 17 Oct 2010 10:03:47 +0200

39 lines

Pseudo-symmetry/refinement

Mike John

Sun, 17 Oct 2010 00:48:30 -0400

84 lines

Re: [QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Kay Diederichs

Sun, 17 Oct 2010 00:04:14 +0200

182 lines

Re: molecule on symmetry axis

George M. Sheldrick

Sat, 16 Oct 2010 23:07:08 +0200

96 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Ian Tickle

Sat, 16 Oct 2010 21:17:12 +0100

221 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Douglas Theobald

Sat, 16 Oct 2010 16:14:22 -0400

388 lines

Re: vector and scalars

James Stroud

Sat, 16 Oct 2010 12:45:50 -0700

23 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Ian Tickle

Sat, 16 Oct 2010 20:32:34 +0100

251 lines

Re: molecule on symmetry axis

Nicholas K. Sauter

Sat, 16 Oct 2010 11:44:59 -0700

85 lines

Re: quantum diffraction

Jürgen Bosch

Sat, 16 Oct 2010 12:22:59 -0400

93 lines

Re: quantum diffraction

Bernhard Rupp

Sat, 16 Oct 2010 08:36:13 -0700

22 lines

Re: How to add water molecules..??

Frederic VELLIEUX

Sat, 16 Oct 2010 16:35:41 +0200

39 lines

How to add water molecules..??

Hussain Bhukyagps

Sat, 16 Oct 2010 19:58:37 +0530

25 lines

Re: update REFMAC

Boaz Shaanan

Sat, 16 Oct 2010 13:24:26 GMT

235 lines

Re: molecule on symmetry axis

Robbie Joosten

Sat, 16 Oct 2010 10:55:59 +0200

165 lines

Re: molecule on symmetry axis

Tim Gruene

Sat, 16 Oct 2010 10:25:47 +0200

92 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Tim Gruene

Sat, 16 Oct 2010 09:50:56 +0200

211 lines

Re: crystal growth

Seema Nath

Sat, 16 Oct 2010 04:56:23 +0100

14 lines

Re: update REFMAC

Ben Eisenbraun

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 22:45:27 -0400

56 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Ian Tickle

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 23:55:54 +0100

159 lines

Re: molecule on symmetry axis

George M. Sheldrick

Sat, 16 Oct 2010 00:41:06 +0200

53 lines

molecule on symmetry axis

Jacqueline Vitali

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 18:28:52 -0400

61 lines

peculiar twinning case

Ed Pozharski

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 18:08:09 -0400

69 lines

Re: quantum diffraction

Bart Hazes

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 15:23:36 -0600

59 lines

Re: crystal growth

Ho Leung Ng

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:58:21 -0700

15 lines

Re: quantum diffraction

Bernhard Rupp

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:41:45 -0700

28 lines

Re: quantum diffraction

Dale Tronrud

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:14:59 -0700

49 lines

Re: quantum diffraction

Bryan Lepore

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 16:07:24 -0400

13 lines

Re: quantum diffraction

Bart Hazes

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:44:15 -0600

50 lines

Re: quantum diffraction

Bart Hazes

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:38:42 -0600

45 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Douglas Theobald

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 15:11:48 -0400

190 lines

Re: quantum diffraction

Bernhard Rupp

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 12:04:59 -0700

34 lines

Re: Source for trimethyl lead acetate

Martin Hallberg

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 20:58:11 +0200

64 lines

Re: quantum diffraction

Jacob Keller

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:43:38 -0500

19 lines

Re: quantum diffraction

Jacob Keller

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:37:19 -0500

48 lines

Re: quantum diffraction

Bernhard Rupp

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 11:27:37 -0700

34 lines

Source for trimethyl lead acetate

matthew vetting

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:54:42 -0400

13 lines

update REFMAC

Ed Pozharski

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:08:55 -0400

30 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Frances C. Bernstein

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 12:51:59 -0400

42 lines

Re: [QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

James Holton

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:44:33 -0700

70 lines

Re: inflated BOND_RMSD with external restraints (refmac)

Ed Pozharski

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 12:43:06 -0400

60 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Ian Tickle

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 17:40:57 +0100

96 lines

quantum diffraction

James Holton

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:37:11 -0700

63 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Douglas Theobald

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 12:30:16 -0400

113 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Jacob Keller

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 11:25:41 -0500

20 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Douglas Theobald

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 12:17:59 -0400

158 lines

Re: vector and scalars

William G. Scott

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:14:22 -0700

25 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Ganesh Natrajan

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 17:37:56 +0200

56 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Douglas Theobald

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 11:20:04 -0400

154 lines

Re: inflated BOND_RMSD with external restraints (refmac)

Ed Pozharski

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:22:27 -0400

77 lines

Re: vector and scalars

David Schuller

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 08:56:35 -0400

30 lines

Re: inflated BOND_RMSD with external restraints (refmac)

Ian Tickle

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 10:54:59 +0100

39 lines

Re: inflated BOND_RMSD with external restraints (refmac)

Ian Tickle

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 10:26:37 +0100

49 lines

spread out. .

Esther Fernandez

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:23:32 +0200

42662 lines

spread out

Esther Fernandez

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:23:32 +0200

42661 lines

Re: [QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

William G. Scott

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 20:33:53 -0700

49 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

William G. Scott

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:27:48 -0700

71 lines

Re: [QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another) - Counting statistics

Felix Frolow

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 23:50:11 +0200

63 lines

Re: [QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Ethan Merritt

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:47:23 -0700

34 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Ed Pozharski

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 17:45:32 -0400

22 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Ed Pozharski

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 17:43:09 -0400

31 lines

Re: [QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Tim Gruene

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 23:42:18 +0200

61 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Tim Gruene

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 23:31:09 +0200

114 lines

Re: [QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Jacob Keller

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:28:26 -0500

69 lines

Re: inflated BOND_RMSD with external restraints (refmac)

Garib N Murshudov

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 22:04:57 +0100

64 lines

inflated BOND_RMSD with external restraints (refmac)

Ed Pozharski

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:51:38 -0400

38 lines

Re: [QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Ethan Merritt

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 13:43:50 -0700

231 lines

Faculty Position, Dept of Molecular Biology, Princeton University

Phil Jeffrey

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:33:29 -0400

36 lines

Re: [QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Bart Hazes

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:18:04 -0600

64 lines

RE : [ccp4bb] vector and scalars

Alexandre OURJOUMTSEV

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 19:45:41 +0000

27 lines

Re: [QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Ethan Merritt

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 12:34:44 -0700

374 lines

Re: [QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Lijun Liu

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 12:12:18 -0700

1384 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Ethan Merritt

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:13:49 -0700

301 lines

NUVISION 60GX glasses/emitters

David Roberts

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 13:59:21 -0400

29 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Lijun Liu

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 10:41:17 -0700

938 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Ed Pozharski

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 13:38:39 -0400

29 lines

Webinar -- "Scientific inquiry, inference and critical reasoning in the macromolecular crystallography curriculum"

Angela Criswell

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 12:28:06 -0500

66 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Jacob Keller

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 12:23:27 -0500

20 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Bart Hazes

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:17:42 -0600

314 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Ethan Merritt

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 10:14:46 -0700

115 lines

Sweet and discreet tweets about helices and sheets - @PDBeurope

Gerard DVD Kleywegt

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 19:10:19 +0200

33 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Jacob Keller

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:59:34 -0500

257 lines

Re: Problem installing CCP4 on MacOSX behind firewall?

William Scott

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 09:39:45 -0700

67 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Dale Tronrud

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 09:28:48 -0700

219 lines

Re: vector and scalars

James Holton

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 09:11:50 -0700

90 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Ian Tickle

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:58:23 +0100

129 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Ganesh Natrajan

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 17:52:22 +0200

109 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Ed Pozharski

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:22:15 -0400

84 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

William G. Scott

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 08:21:19 -0700

56 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Joseph Cockburn

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 17:14:42 +0200

89 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Ian Tickle

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:03:26 +0100

77 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Joseph Cockburn

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 17:02:54 +0200

178 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Ganesh Natrajan

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:47:40 +0200

63 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Ed Pozharski

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 10:40:09 -0400

31 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Ed Pozharski

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 10:22:59 -0400

151 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question

Ian Tickle

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:48:00 +0100

170 lines

Re: Problem installing CCP4 on MacOSX behind firewall?

Tim Gruene

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:30:31 +0200

91 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question

Tim Gruene

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:24:20 +0200

156 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question

Ian Tickle

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 12:34:30 +0100

108 lines

Problem installing CCP4 on MacOSX behind firewall?

Mads Gabrielsen

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 10:20:17 +0100

37 lines

Re: cad, freerflag, uniqueify : free set when making anomalous from merged data

Eleanor Dodson

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 10:16:02 +0100

62 lines

Re: protein ligand energy

John R Helliwell

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 08:57:50 +0100

114 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Tim Gruene

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 08:41:20 +0200

63 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

James Holton

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 22:38:07 -0700

195 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Lijun Liu

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 22:01:19 -0700

591 lines

Re: crystal growth

Seema Nath

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 05:43:45 +0100

23 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Bernhard Rupp

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 20:07:04 -0700

34 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Jacob Keller

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 21:42:31 -0500

156 lines

Re: Summary : [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question

William G. Scott

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 18:10:06 -0700

152 lines

crystal growth

Peter Hsu

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 01:41:15 +0100

28 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Lijun Liu

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 17:27:03 -0700

418 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

James Holton

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 17:02:28 -0700

248 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

William G. Scott

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:51:21 -0700

31 lines

Fill map/mask with dummy atoms?

Alex Shkumatov

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 23:50:38 +0000

104 lines

embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Jacob Keller

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 18:21:15 -0500

109 lines

Re: Twin - Data reduction and refinement in Refmac

Peter Chan

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 19:05:49 -0400

369 lines

Edward Berry

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 19:03:48 -0400

46 lines

Re: Twin - Data reduction and refinement in Refmac

Garib N Murshudov

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 23:55:56 +0100

410 lines

Re: Twin - Data reduction and refinement in Refmac

Peter Chan

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 18:46:21 -0400

201 lines

Re: Twin - Data reduction and refinement in Refmac

Peter Chan

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 18:41:17 -0400

328 lines

Re: Summary : [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question

Lijun Liu

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:18:05 -0700

358 lines

Re: Summary : [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question

Tim Gruene

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 00:09:44 +0200

168 lines

Summary : [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question

William Scott

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:58:56 -0700

83 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question

Yong Y Wang

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:57:33 -0400

75 lines

Re: Twin - Data reduction and refinement in Refmac

Garib N Murshudov

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 21:51:57 +0100

166 lines

Re: twinning and refmac

Garib N Murshudov

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 21:45:56 +0100

77 lines

twinning and refmac

Arnon Lavie

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:33:02 -0500

56 lines

cad, freerflag, uniqueify : free set when making anomalous from merged data

Lepore, Bryan

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:07:35 -0400

32 lines

Re: "CCP4i has no longer control of the current database error"

Seema Nath

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 19:52:08 +0100

17 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question

Jacob Keller

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:50:30 -0500

77 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question

Daniel Anderson

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:31:19 -0700

55 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question

Tim Gruene

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 20:30:30 +0200

100 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question

Bernhard Rupp

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:28:27 -0700

80 lines

embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question

William Scott

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 10:48:00 -0700

46 lines

Twin - Data reduction and refinement in Refmac

Peter Chan

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:01:55 -0400

125 lines

Re: protein ligand energy

Martyn Winn

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:35:51 +0100

87 lines

Re: protein ligand energy

Robert Esnouf

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:15:47 +0100

59 lines

Re: protein ligand energy

Christina Bourne

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:13:14 -0700

63 lines

Re: Need suggestions for protein: ligand ratio for co-crystallization

Ed Pozharski

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 10:08:34 -0400

60 lines

Fill map/mask with dummy atoms?

Tanner, John J.

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 08:28:42 -0500

56 lines

Re: Fill map/mask with dummy atoms?

Victor Lamzin

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:07:22 +0200

56 lines

Re: protein ligand energy

John R Helliwell

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:30:09 +0100

40 lines

Re: Fwd: [ccp4bb] Fill map/mask with dummy atoms?

Eleanor Dodson

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:00:42 +0100

40 lines

Re: protein ligand energy

Vellieux Frederic

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:56:48 +0200

41 lines

Fwd: [ccp4bb] Fill map/mask with dummy atoms?

Dirk Kostrewa

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:49:53 +0200

45 lines

protein ligand energy

Rex Palmer

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 12:43:49 +0100

50 lines

Fill map/mask with dummy atoms?

Dirk Kostrewa

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:00:32 +0200

34 lines

Re: Lousy diffraction at home but fantastic at the synchrotron?

Gunnar Olovsson

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 13:51:44 -0700

262 lines

Need suggestions for protein: ligand ratio for co-crystallization

lei feng

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:09:04 -0400

73 lines

New Free Molecular Graphics and Presentation Software

Andrew Orry

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 12:58:47 -0700

71 lines

"CCP4i has no longer control of the current database error"

Jyotica Batra

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:44:08 +0100

29 lines

Re: I really need a file(such as .pdb) contains pseudo tanslation

Gerard DVD Kleywegt

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:56:04 +0200

67 lines

Re: Lousy diffraction at home but fantastic at the synchrotron?

James Holton

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 09:04:05 -0700

111 lines

Re: which Linux workstation for crystallography to buy?

Roger Rowlett

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:08:09 -0400

228 lines

FW: please post

Joe Ng

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:03:27 -0500

672 lines

Re: I really need a file(such as .pdb) contains pseudo tanslation

Huanwang Yang

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:18:49 -0400

52 lines

Re: which Linux workstation for crystallography to buy?

David Roberts

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:00:05 -0400

253 lines

Re: which Linux workstation for crystallography to buy?

Paul Smith

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 06:03:55 -0700

148 lines

Re: I really need a file(such as .pdb) contains pseudo tanslation

Eleanor Dodson

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:40:41 +0100

42 lines

Re: Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed

Christian Roth

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:32:09 +0200

72 lines

I really need a file(such as .pdb) contains pseudo tanslation

Ting-Wei Jiang

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 17:19:47 +0800

46 lines

Re: which Linux workstation for crystallography to buy?

Tim Gruene

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:48:54 +0200

145 lines

Re: which Linux workstation for crystallography to buy?

Vellieux Frederic

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:46:10 +0200

112 lines

which Linux workstation for crystallography to buy?

Benini Stefano (P)

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:28:28 +0200

121 lines

Re: Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed

Garib N Murshudov

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 01:43:17 +0100

274 lines

Re: Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed

Pete Meyer

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:12:04 -0500

236 lines

Re: Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed

Garib N Murshudov

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 22:05:11 +0100

317 lines

Re: Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed

Tim Gruene

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 22:31:24 +0200

89 lines

Re: Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed

Pavel Afonine

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 13:10:43 -0700

146 lines

Re: Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed

Christian Roth

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 22:04:49 +0200

196 lines

Re: Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed

Pavel Afonine

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 12:52:03 -0700

28 lines

Re: Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed

Ethan Merritt

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 12:50:53 -0700

58 lines

Re: Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed

Tim Gruene

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:38:51 +0200

296 lines

Re: Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed

Pavel Afonine

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 12:31:13 -0700

28 lines

Fluorometers

Leiman Petr

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 19:07:14 +0000

45 lines

Re: Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed

Ethan Merritt

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:48:15 -0700

216 lines

Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed

Christian Roth

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:01:10 +0200

159 lines

Re: Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed

Ethan Merritt

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 10:50:10 -0700

183 lines

Beamtime @ SLS

Meitian Wang

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:30:11 +0200

206 lines

1 POSTDOCTORAL POSITION Biochemistry/Molecular Biology/Structural Biology

Marcelo Guerin

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:01:17 +0200

81 lines

Tommi Kajander

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:28:56 +0300

50 lines

Dilip Badgujar

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 05:34:06 -0000

54 lines

Re: Too many microcrystals.......

Laurie Betts

Sun, 10 Oct 2010 16:24:30 -0500

126 lines

Re: Too many microcrystals.......

Sanishvili, Ruslan

Sun, 10 Oct 2010 08:49:18 -0500

328 lines

Re: Too many microcrystals.......

Tim Gruene

Sun, 10 Oct 2010 12:23:09 +0200

80 lines

Re: Too many microcrystals.......

Jürgen Bosch

Sun, 10 Oct 2010 02:41:21 -0400

129 lines

Too many microcrystals.......

Dilip Badgujar

Sun, 10 Oct 2010 06:15:44 -0000

59 lines

[OFF-TOPIC] Science is Vital.

David Briggs

Sat, 9 Oct 2010 07:02:38 +0100

52 lines

Re: Differences between refmac_5.5 and refmac_5.2

Garib N Murshudov

Sat, 9 Oct 2010 00:36:24 +0100

38 lines

Differences between refmac_5.5 and refmac_5.2

Hailiang Zhang

Fri, 8 Oct 2010 19:15:23 -0400

21 lines

Re: Removing a tight binding ligand

SIPPEL,KATHERINE H

Fri, 8 Oct 2010 13:48:02 -0400

126 lines

unknown ligand density

Matthew Merski

Fri, 8 Oct 2010 10:27:23 -0700

69 lines

Re: Removing a tight binding ligand

Joseph Ho

Fri, 8 Oct 2010 12:20:39 -0400

80 lines

Re: Removing a tight binding ligand

Nadir T. Mrabet

Fri, 8 Oct 2010 18:10:37 +0200

61 lines

Re: Removing a tight binding ligand

Mathews, Irimpan I.

Fri, 8 Oct 2010 08:27:10 -0700

58 lines

Re: Removing a tight binding ligand

Joseph Ho

Fri, 8 Oct 2010 11:01:29 -0400

48 lines

Call for applications to the Membrane Protein Lab at Diamond

Dr. Isabel De Moraes

Fri, 8 Oct 2010 15:12:16 +0100

400 lines

Re: Detergent and globular proteins

Sally Pham Thanh Van

Fri, 8 Oct 2010 07:37:56 +0200

115 lines

Re: Removing a tight binding ligand

Nian Huang

Fri, 8 Oct 2010 00:32:40 -0500

53 lines

Re: Removing a tight binding ligand

Jacob Keller

Thu, 7 Oct 2010 22:18:54 -0500

50 lines

Re: Removing a tight binding ligand

Daniel Bonsor

Fri, 8 Oct 2010 04:13:52 +0100

44 lines

Removing a tight binding ligand

SIPPEL,KATHERINE H

Thu, 7 Oct 2010 21:05:12 -0400

39 lines

Director of Eukaryotic Protein Production

Steve Almo

Thu, 7 Oct 2010 19:56:07 -0400

68 lines

postdoc position in cryo-EM method development

Sjors Scheres

Thu, 7 Oct 2010 10:47:58 +0100

54 lines

Re: Detergent and globular proteins

Cécile Breyton

Thu, 7 Oct 2010 09:57:27 +0200

183 lines

Detergent and globular proteins

R.Srinivasan

Thu, 7 Oct 2010 01:27:04 +0530

54 lines

Postdoctoral positions available

Liang Tang

Wed, 6 Oct 2010 14:23:55 -0500

37 lines

Re: Crystal Caves Sun Oct 10 Nat Geo

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.)

Wed, 6 Oct 2010 10:14:10 -0700

47 lines

Re: Is the Rmerge invalidate by twinned data?

Jon Schuermann

Wed, 6 Oct 2010 10:37:20 -0500

49 lines

Re: Is the Rmerge invalidate by twinned data?

Jim Pflugrath

Wed, 6 Oct 2010 10:07:43 -0500

32 lines

Re: Is the Rmerge invalidate by twinned data?

Ed Pozharski

Wed, 6 Oct 2010 10:55:22 -0400

30 lines

No TABFUN in Amore

Claudine Bisson

Wed, 6 Oct 2010 14:29:50 +0100

34 lines

Re: Zalman

Bernhard C. Lohkamp

Wed, 6 Oct 2010 12:34:08 +0200

33 lines

Re: Zalman

Paul Emsley

Wed, 6 Oct 2010 10:30:52 +0100

30 lines

Is the Rmerge invalidate by twinned data?

fulvio saccoccia

Wed, 6 Oct 2010 11:28:34 +0200

17 lines

Re: stereo (again - sigh)

Tim Gruene

Wed, 6 Oct 2010 11:23:22 +0200

101 lines

Re: Zalman

AMIT

Wed, 6 Oct 2010 14:07:56 +0530

29 lines

Re: stereo (again - sigh)

David Roberts

Tue, 5 Oct 2010 15:14:03 -0400

80 lines

Re: stereo (again - sigh)

<>

Tue, 5 Oct 2010 20:21:04 +0200

84 lines

Re: stereo (again - sigh)

Harry Powell

Tue, 5 Oct 2010 17:37:07 +0000

66 lines

Re: stereo (again - sigh)

Ben Eisenbraun

Tue, 5 Oct 2010 12:25:16 -0400

41 lines

stereo (again - sigh)

David Roberts

Tue, 5 Oct 2010 12:11:19 -0400

42 lines

Re: met auxotroph S.cerevisiae strain?

Martin Hallberg

Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:29:35 +0200

99 lines

met auxotroph S.cerevisiae strain?

tommi kajander

Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:47:21 +0300

32 lines

Re: R factor & R free struck

Roger Rowlett

Tue, 5 Oct 2010 08:33:16 -0400

56 lines

Re: Radiation damage with crystals containing metal centers (TaBr people chime in?)

J. Preben Morth

Tue, 5 Oct 2010 10:34:54 +0200

76 lines

Fwd: [ccp4bb] Summary: measure detergent concentration

weikai

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 19:57:57 -0400

153 lines

Re: How to detect the concentration of detergent?

Ho Leung Ng

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 16:34:30 -0700

17 lines

Re: shape complementarity

Mike Lawrence

Tue, 5 Oct 2010 09:26:45 +1100

74 lines

Re: R factor & R free struck

Steven Sheriff

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 23:03:53 +0100

25 lines

Re: Radiation damage with crystals containing metal centers (TaBr people chime in?)

Poul Nissen

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 22:04:06 +0200

52 lines

Re: Radiation damage with crystals containing metal centers (TaBr people chime in?)

Jacob Keller

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 14:48:53 -0500

56 lines

Re: Radiation damage with crystals containing metal centers (TaBr people chime in?)

Poul Nissen

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 21:21:50 +0200

69 lines

Re: Radiation damage with crystals containing metal centers (TaBr people chime in?)

Dunten, Pete W.

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 11:25:20 -0700

68 lines

Re: How to detect the concentration of detergent?

Philipp Ellinger

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 18:50:43 +0200

258 lines

Re: Radiation damage with crystals containing metal centers (TaBr people chime in?)

Phil Evans

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 17:34:10 +0100

58 lines

Radiation damage with crystals containing metal centers (TaBr people chime in?)

Francis E Reyes

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 10:28:35 -0600

49 lines

Re: Coot cannot read mtz or pdb files

Tim Gruene

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 18:24:27 +0200

70 lines

Postdoctoral Position Available

Richard Baxter

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 17:14:13 +0100

42 lines

Re: How to detect the concentration of detergent?

Owen Pornillos

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 11:09:26 -0400

184 lines

Re: How to detect the concentration of detergent?

Edward A. Berry

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 10:55:23 -0400

65 lines

Re: How to detect the concentration of detergent?

Van Den Berg, Bert

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 10:42:37 -0400

140 lines

Re: How to detect the concentration of detergent?

Murray, James W

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 15:42:25 +0100

67 lines

Re: Coot cannot read mtz or pdb files

Leiman Petr

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 14:35:02 +0000

20 lines

How to detect the concentration of detergent?

yybbll

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 16:28:44 +0200

79 lines

shape complementarity

Reiner Ribarics

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 15:01:19 +0100

55 lines

Re: Twinned data

Clayton, Gina Martyn

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 09:55:15 -0400

259 lines

Re: Twinned data

Clayton, Gina Martyn

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 09:40:26 -0400

141 lines

Re: Coot cannot read mtz or pdb files

Leiman Petr

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 13:05:30 +0000

18 lines

Re: Coot cannot read mtz or pdb files

Thomas Womack

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 11:32:20 +0100

33 lines

Re: Coot cannot read mtz or pdb files

Chris Richardson

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 11:32:16 +0100

42 lines

Coot cannot read mtz or pdb files

Leiman Petr

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 10:15:56 +0000

1522 lines

Re: R factor & R free struck

J. Preben Morth

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 11:50:37 +0200

110 lines

Re: R factor & R free struck

Ian Tickle

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 10:27:10 +0100

52 lines

Re: mol rep help needed

Clemens Vonrhein

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 09:54:06 +0100

47 lines

Re: R factor & R free struck

Eleanor Dodson

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 09:47:43 +0100

46 lines

Postdoctoral position in membrane protein crystallography at Vanderbilt University

Iverson, Tina M

Sun, 3 Oct 2010 15:52:54 -0500

118 lines

Re: R factor & R free struck

J. Preben Morth

Sun, 3 Oct 2010 19:34:44 +0200

110 lines

Re: R factor & R free struck

Eleanor Dodson

Sun, 3 Oct 2010 12:15:38 +0100

37 lines

Re: mol rep help needed

Eleanor Dodson

Sun, 3 Oct 2010 12:10:06 +0100

73 lines

Re: R factor & R free struck

Anastassis Perrakis

Sun, 3 Oct 2010 10:57:02 +0200

145 lines

Re: R factor & R free struck

Poul Nissen

Sun, 3 Oct 2010 09:09:16 +0200

89 lines

R factor & R free struck

Jack Russel

Sat, 2 Oct 2010 19:56:18 -0700

51 lines

Re: .cv to .mtz conversion

Ezra's gmail

Sat, 2 Oct 2010 22:55:58 -0400

25 lines

Re: mol rep help needed

xaravich ivan

Sat, 2 Oct 2010 09:59:33 -0700

129 lines

New home for Science, Nature, Phys.Rev.B.

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.)

Fri, 1 Oct 2010 19:18:22 -0700

40 lines

Re: Twinned data

George M. Sheldrick

Sat, 2 Oct 2010 00:35:09 +0200

78 lines

Job Opening Announcement

Lance Westerhoff

Fri, 1 Oct 2010 17:47:02 -0400

36 lines

Re: Zalman

William Scott

Fri, 1 Oct 2010 13:05:09 -0700

64 lines

Twinned data

Clayton, Gina Martyn

Fri, 1 Oct 2010 15:18:02 -0400

53 lines

open positions in protein engineering at UCSF

xiaokun shu

Fri, 1 Oct 2010 10:12:42 -0700

48 lines

Re: Zalman

Tim Gruene

Fri, 1 Oct 2010 18:51:36 +0200

71 lines

Zalman

Sickmier, Allen

Fri, 1 Oct 2010 08:57:07 -0700

129 lines

Re: unknown density

Robbie Joosten

Fri, 1 Oct 2010 17:55:05 +0200

105 lines

mol rep help needed

David Roberts

Fri, 1 Oct 2010 11:40:13 -0400

50 lines

Re: unknown density

<>

Fri, 1 Oct 2010 17:21:31 +0200

136 lines

Re: unknown density

Priscila Oliveira de Giuseppe

Fri, 1 Oct 2010 11:38:53 -0300

61 lines

Re: unknown density

Vellieux Frederic

Fri, 1 Oct 2010 15:20:00 +0200

74 lines

unknown density

Priscila Oliveira de Giuseppe

Fri, 1 Oct 2010 08:12:12 -0300

166548 lines

Intensive 2-day School in Biological and Chemical Crystallography

John R Helliwell

Fri, 1 Oct 2010 09:57:15 +0100

29 lines

Crystal Caves Sun Oct 10 Nat Geo

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.)

Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:36:12 -0700

32 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager