JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB Archives

CCP4BB Archives


October 2010


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"CCP4i has no longer control of the current database error" (2 messages)
**Possible spam**cryoprotetant for 35% Dioxane (6 messages)
.cv to .mtz conversion (1 message)
1 POSTDOCTORAL POSITION Biochemistry/Molecular Biology/Structural Biology (1 message)
<No subject> (3 messages)
Additional band on gel due to his-tag: any references? (8 messages)
Against Method (R) (32 messages)
AKTA FPLC system available [off-topic] (1 message)
Babinet solvent correction / comment for imperfect models (1 message)
Babinet solvent correction [WAS: R-free flag problem] (9 messages)
Beamtime @ SLS (1 message)
Big difference between anomalous map and density modification map (6 messages)
Biological Structures Group BCA Winter Meeting - Wed 15th December, University of Reading - REGISTRATION NOW OPEN! (1 message)
Bug in c_truncate? (14 messages)
cad, freerflag, uniqueify : free set when making anomalous from merged data (2 messages)
Call for applications to the Membrane Protein Lab at Diamond (1 message)
CNIO International PhD and Postdoctoral Programmes_2011 call (1 message)
Coot cannot read mtz or pdb files (6 messages)
coot color question (1 message)
coot-0.5.2-osx-universal.dmg.gz (1 message)
cryoprotetant for 35% Dioxane (1 message)
Crystal Caves Sun Oct 10 Nat Geo (2 messages)
crystal growth (5 messages)
Cys auxotroph (5 messages)
deposition related question (2 messages)
Detergent and globular proteins (3 messages)
Diamond MX BAG Training (1 message)
Differences between refmac_5.5 and refmac_5.2 (2 messages)
Director of Eukaryotic Protein Production (1 message)
diverging Rcryst and Rfree (18 messages)
diverging Rcryst and Rfree [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (5 messages)
DLS (6 messages)
DNA-protein complex. (2 messages)
embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (9 messages)
embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another) (20 messages)
Faculty Position, Dept of Molecular Biology, Princeton University (1 message)
Fill map/mask with dummy atoms? (7 messages)
Fluorometers (1 message)
FOM: Phaser vs SigmaA (5 messages)
Free R with doubled cell edge (4 messages)
FW: please post (1 message)
FW: [ccp4bb] Babinet solvent correction [WAS: R-free flag problem] (1 message)
Fwd: [ccp4bb] Fill map/mask with dummy atoms? (2 messages)
Fwd: [ccp4bb] Summary: measure detergent concentration (1 message)
Fwd: [ccp4bb] tlsanl *NOW ALSO REFMAC* and phenix TLS results (1 message)
Hardware question (7 messages)
Help with model bias in merihedral twin (1 message)
Help with model bias in merihedral twin + Refmac5 (2 messages)
Help with Optimizing Crystals (10 messages)
help with pymol error message (3 messages)
How to add water molecules..?? (2 messages)
How to detect the concentration of detergent? (7 messages)
How to get PDB of small molecule which is not available in data base..?? (3 messages)
I really need a file(such as .pdb) contains pseudo tanslation (4 messages)
inflated BOND_RMSD with external restraints (refmac) (6 messages)
Intensive 2-day School in Biological and Chemical Crystallography (1 message)
Is the Rmerge invalidate by twinned data? (4 messages)
JAC (2010), 43,1242-1249 (3 messages)
Job Opening Announcement (1 message)
Lousy diffraction at home but fantastic at the synchrotron? (3 messages)
message for CCP4bb (1 message)
met auxotroph S.cerevisiae strain? (2 messages)
Milch and Minor (4 messages)
mol rep help needed (4 messages)
molecule on symmetry axis (7 messages)
Need suggestions for protein: ligand ratio for co-crystallization (2 messages)
New Free Molecular Graphics and Presentation Software (1 message)
New home for Science, Nature, Phys.Rev.B. (1 message)
No TABFUN in Amore (1 message)
NUVISION 60GX glasses/emitters (1 message)
oligomer ligand building (4 messages)
open positions in protein engineering at UCSF (1 message)
peculiar twinning case (2 messages)
Position as Postdoctoral Research Fellow - in membrane proteins structural biology , Oslo Norway (1 message)
Positions available (3 messages)
Positions available at the High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) - Japan (1 message)
Post-Doctoral Position in Structural Biology (2 messages)
postdoc position in cryo-EM method development (1 message)
Postdoctoral Position Available (1 message)
Postdoctoral Position in Barcelona (1 message)
Postdoctoral position in membrane protein crystallography at Vanderbilt University (1 message)
Postdoctoral position in Toulouse, France (1 message)
Postdoctoral positions available (1 message)
Postdoctotal Position in Barcelona (erratum) (1 message)
Problem installing CCP4 on MacOSX behind firewall? (3 messages)
protein ligand energy (7 messages)
Pseudo-symmetry/refinement (5 messages)
quantum diffraction (13 messages)
que fem sobre això miquel? es veu que l'Esther Cid en el seu dia ja ho va enviar. (1 message)
Question regarding S-SAD (3 messages)
R factor & R free struck (10 messages)
R-free flag problem (4 messages)
R-free flag problem. (2 messages)
Radiation damage with crystals containing metal centers (TaBr people chime in?) (7 messages)
RE : [ccp4bb] Babinet solvent correction [WAS: R-free flag problem] (1 message)
RE : [ccp4bb] vector and scalars (1 message)
Real space refinement [was: Against Method (R)] (1 message)
Refinement (5 messages)
refining structures with engineered disulfide bonds (4 messages)
Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed (14 messages)
Reg. PATCH-ERR in CNS (2 messages)
Regarding space group P1, P21 (27 messages)
Reindexing scaled data (4 messages)
Removing a tight binding ligand (9 messages)
resolution limit stuck in Refmac5 (2 messages)
rigorously compatible coordinate files (1 message)
Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree) (23 messages)
Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree) - Problems with Publishing (1 message)
Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree) [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (2 messages)
shape complementarity (2 messages)
Source for trimethyl lead acetate (2 messages)
spread out (1 message)
spread out. . (1 message)
stereo (again - sigh) (6 messages)
Strange spots (28 messages)
Strange spots - In book of John Helliwell (1 message)
Summary : [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (4 messages)
Sweet and discreet tweets about helices and sheets - @PDBeurope (1 message)
Takeda San Diego, Scientist, Membrane Protein Chemistry (1 message)
tlsanl *NOW ALSO REFMAC* and phenix TLS results (3 messages)
tlsanl and phenix TLS results (2 messages)
Too many microcrystals....... (5 messages)
Twin - Data reduction and refinement in Refmac (6 messages)
Twinned data (4 messages)
twinning and refmac (2 messages)
unknown density (5 messages)
unknown ligand density (1 message)
update REFMAC (3 messages)
update--degradation of MBP fusion protein (2 messages)
vector and scalars (28 messages)
Webinar -- "Scientific inquiry, inference and critical reasoning in the macromolecular crystallography curriculum" (1 message)
what package provides libg2c.so.0 on Ubuntu ? (6 messages)
what package provides libg2c.so.0 on Ubuntu ? - solved (2 messages)
which Linux workstation for crystallography to buy? (6 messages)
Which version CCP4 output DFc colume in SIGMAA? (1 message)
Zalman (6 messages)
[OFF-TOPIC] Science is Vital. (1 message)
[OT]:Android (2 messages)
[QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another) (10 messages)
[QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another) - Counting statistics (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"CCP4i has no longer control of the current database error"

"CCP4i has no longer control of the current database error"

Jyotica Batra <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:44:08 +0100

29 lines

Re: "CCP4i has no longer control of the current database error"

Seema Nath <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 19:52:08 +0100

17 lines

New Thread

**Possible spam**cryoprotetant for 35% Dioxane

**Possible spam**cryoprotetant for 35% Dioxane

Jerry McCully <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 17:00:51 -0700

59 lines

Re: **Possible spam**cryoprotetant for 35% Dioxane

Eric Larson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:13:49 -0700

70 lines

Re: **Possible spam**cryoprotetant for 35% Dioxane

Edward Snell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:07:04 -0400

103 lines

Re: **Possible spam**cryoprotetant for 35% Dioxane

Jürgen Bosch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:17:07 -0400

211 lines

Re: **Possible spam**cryoprotetant for 35% Dioxane

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:48:00 -0400

210 lines

Re: **Possible spam**cryoprotetant for 35% Dioxane

Prince, D Bryan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:34:27 -0400

424 lines

New Thread

.cv to .mtz conversion

Re: .cv to .mtz conversion

Ezra's gmail <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Oct 2010 22:55:58 -0400

25 lines

New Thread

1 POSTDOCTORAL POSITION Biochemistry/Molecular Biology/Structural Biology

1 POSTDOCTORAL POSITION Biochemistry/Molecular Biology/Structural Biology

Marcelo Guerin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:01:17 +0200

81 lines

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

Dilip Badgujar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 05:34:06 -0000

54 lines

<No subject>

Tommi Kajander <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:28:56 +0300

50 lines

<No subject>

Edward Berry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 19:03:48 -0400

46 lines

New Thread

Additional band on gel due to his-tag: any references?

Additional band on gel due to his-tag: any references?

Sebastiaan Werten <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 13:16:59 +0200

34 lines

Re: Additional band on gel due to his-tag: any references?

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 13:51:19 +0200

86 lines

Re: Additional band on gel due to his-tag: any references?

Skrzypczak-Jankun, Ewa <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:09:37 -0400

571 lines

Re: Additional band on gel due to his-tag: any references?

Jan Schoepe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:21:37 +0100

307 lines

Re: Additional band on gel due to his-tag: any references?

Van Den Berg, Bert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:55:00 -0400

124 lines

Re: Additional band on gel due to his-tag: any references?

Sebastiaan Werten <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:03:29 +0200

180 lines

Re: Additional band on gel due to his-tag: any references?

Artem Evdokimov <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:09:23 -0500

129 lines

Re: Additional band on gel due to his-tag: any references?

Daniel Bonsor <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:18:51 +0100

24 lines

New Thread

Against Method (R)

Against Method (R)

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:46:46 -0700

95 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Phoebe Rice <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:30:11 -0500

89 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Ethan Merritt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:28:06 -0700

124 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Gerard Bricogne <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 19:41:15 +0100

159 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:53:05 -0700

28 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Ian Tickle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 20:44:14 +0100

173 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Frank von Delft <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:16:58 +0100

199 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Ethan Merritt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:59:34 -0700

223 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

James Holton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:31:24 -0700

566 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:45:32 -0500

86 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Ethan Merritt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:45:28 -0700

313 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

James Holton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:15:16 -0700

126 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Frank von Delft <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:56:36 +0100

60 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 10:34:26 -0400

35 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Ethan A Merritt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 10:44:21 -0700

64 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

George M. Sheldrick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:05:52 +0200

60 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 08:00:17 -0500

93 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:48:21 -0400

106 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

George M. Sheldrick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:50:31 +0200

111 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:04:28 -0500

136 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

James Holton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:33:12 -0700

386 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Bart Hazes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:13:43 -0600

277 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:49:11 -0500

613 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

James Holton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:56:44 -0700

573 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Ethan Merritt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:09:00 -0700

201 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Bart Hazes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:15:08 -0600

365 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Bart Hazes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:32:04 -0600

67 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Robbie Joosten <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:03:10 +0200

200 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Dirk Kostrewa <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 09:50:32 +0200

328 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

George M. Sheldrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:41:09 +0200

210 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Dirk Kostrewa <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:26:03 +0200

238 lines

Re: Against Method (R)

Bart Hazes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 09:31:16 -0600

182 lines

New Thread

AKTA FPLC system available [off-topic]

AKTA FPLC system available [off-topic]

Erin A. Curry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Oct 2010 19:12:52 +0100

17 lines

New Thread

Babinet solvent correction / comment for imperfect models

Re: Babinet solvent correction / comment for imperfect models

Alexandre OURJOUMTSEV <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 07:38:33 +0000

180 lines

New Thread

Babinet solvent correction [WAS: R-free flag problem]

Babinet solvent correction [WAS: R-free flag problem]

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:01:49 -0400

26 lines

Re: Babinet solvent correction [WAS: R-free flag problem]

Pavel Afonine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:17:53 -0700

98 lines

Re: Babinet solvent correction [WAS: R-free flag problem]

Ethan Merritt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:38:07 -0700

86 lines

Re: Babinet solvent correction [WAS: R-free flag problem]

Pavel Afonine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:53:32 -0700

64 lines

Re: Babinet solvent correction [WAS: R-free flag problem]

Tim Fenn <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Oct 2010 01:29:46 -0700

95 lines

Re: Babinet solvent correction [WAS: R-free flag problem]

Pavel Afonine <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Oct 2010 10:05:15 -0700

97 lines

Re: Babinet solvent correction [WAS: R-free flag problem]

Tim Fenn <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Oct 2010 13:14:16 -0700

91 lines

Re: Babinet solvent correction [WAS: R-free flag problem]

Dirk Kostrewa <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:56:42 +0200

283 lines

Re: Babinet solvent correction [WAS: R-free flag problem]

Tim Fenn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 13:33:14 -0700

62 lines

New Thread

Beamtime @ SLS

Beamtime @ SLS

Meitian Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:30:11 +0200

206 lines

New Thread

Big difference between anomalous map and density modification map

Big difference between anomalous map and density modification map

Wu, Mousheng <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Oct 2010 14:29:12 -0500

36 lines

Re: Big difference between anomalous map and density modification map

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 10:09:04 +0100

48 lines

Re: Big difference between anomalous map and density modification map

David Schuller <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 08:47:49 -0400

51 lines

Re: Big difference between anomalous map and density modification map

Clemens Vonrhein <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:05:24 +0100

118 lines

Re: Big difference between anomalous map and density modification map

Wu, Mousheng <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 08:33:47 -0500

166 lines

Re: Big difference between anomalous map and density modification map

Clemens Vonrhein <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:29:43 +0100

83 lines

New Thread

Biological Structures Group BCA Winter Meeting - Wed 15th December, University of Reading - REGISTRATION NOW OPEN!

Biological Structures Group BCA Winter Meeting - Wed 15th December, University of Reading - REGISTRATION NOW OPEN!

Kimberly Ann Watson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:39:03 +0100

194 lines

New Thread

Bug in c_truncate?

Bug in c_truncate?

Peter Chan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 21:14:36 -0400

57 lines

Re: Bug in c_truncate?

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 13:41:11 +0200

76 lines

Re: Bug in c_truncate?

Peter Chan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:21:20 -0400

152 lines

Re: Bug in c_truncate?

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:29:31 +0200

110 lines

Re: Bug in c_truncate?

Peter Chan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 12:48:14 -0400

183 lines

Re: Bug in c_truncate?

Phil Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:55:35 +0100

112 lines

Re: Bug in c_truncate?

Martyn Winn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 18:37:50 +0100

123 lines

Re: Bug in c_truncate?

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:46:34 +0200

152 lines

Re: Bug in c_truncate?

George M. Sheldrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:30:01 +0200

129 lines

Re: Bug in c_truncate?

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:01:06 +0200

177 lines

Re: Bug in c_truncate?

Phil Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:05:40 +0100

194 lines

Re: Bug in c_truncate?

Robbie Joosten <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:54:50 +0200

220 lines

Re: Bug in c_truncate?

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:21:42 +0200

212 lines

Re: Bug in c_truncate?

Peter Chan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:36:02 -0400

69 lines

New Thread

cad, freerflag, uniqueify : free set when making anomalous from merged data

cad, freerflag, uniqueify : free set when making anomalous from merged data

Lepore, Bryan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:07:35 -0400

32 lines

Re: cad, freerflag, uniqueify : free set when making anomalous from merged data

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 10:16:02 +0100

62 lines

New Thread

Call for applications to the Membrane Protein Lab at Diamond

Call for applications to the Membrane Protein Lab at Diamond

Dr. Isabel De Moraes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Oct 2010 15:12:16 +0100

400 lines

New Thread

CNIO International PhD and Postdoctoral Programmes_2011 call

CNIO International PhD and Postdoctoral Programmes_2011 call

Marco Mazzorana <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:03:27 +0200

300 lines

New Thread

Coot cannot read mtz or pdb files

Coot cannot read mtz or pdb files

Leiman Petr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 10:15:56 +0000

1522 lines

Re: Coot cannot read mtz or pdb files

Thomas Womack <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 11:32:20 +0100

33 lines

Re: Coot cannot read mtz or pdb files

Chris Richardson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 11:32:16 +0100

42 lines

Re: Coot cannot read mtz or pdb files

Leiman Petr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 13:05:30 +0000

18 lines

Re: Coot cannot read mtz or pdb files

Leiman Petr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 14:35:02 +0000

20 lines

Re: Coot cannot read mtz or pdb files

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 18:24:27 +0200

70 lines

New Thread

coot color question

coot color question

Hailiang Zhang <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Oct 2010 13:22:27 -0400

17 lines

New Thread

coot-0.5.2-osx-universal.dmg.gz

coot-0.5.2-osx-universal.dmg.gz

Jeroen Mesters <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:14:33 +0200

15 lines

New Thread

cryoprotetant for 35% Dioxane

cryoprotetant for 35% Dioxane

Enrico Stura <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:31:42 +0200

43 lines

New Thread

Crystal Caves Sun Oct 10 Nat Geo

Crystal Caves Sun Oct 10 Nat Geo

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:36:12 -0700

32 lines

Re: Crystal Caves Sun Oct 10 Nat Geo

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Oct 2010 10:14:10 -0700

47 lines

New Thread

crystal growth

crystal growth

Peter Hsu <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 01:41:15 +0100

28 lines

Re: crystal growth

Seema Nath <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 05:43:45 +0100

23 lines

Re: crystal growth

Ho Leung Ng <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:58:21 -0700

15 lines

Re: crystal growth

Seema Nath <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Oct 2010 04:56:23 +0100

14 lines

Re: crystal growth

Enrico Stura <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:15:45 +0200

40 lines

New Thread

Cys auxotroph

Cys auxotroph

Yogesh Gupta <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:05:06 -0400

48 lines

Re: Cys auxotroph

Daniel Bonsor <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 16:27:13 +0100

19 lines

Re: Cys auxotroph

M T <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 22:01:12 +0200

57 lines

Re: Cys auxotroph

Paula Salgado <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:04:13 +0100

70 lines

Re: Cys auxotroph

Paula Salgado <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:00:45 +0100

165 lines

New Thread

deposition related question

deposition related question

Sudhir Kumar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:09:07 +0530

26 lines

Re: deposition related question

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:54:31 +0200

73 lines

New Thread

Detergent and globular proteins

Detergent and globular proteins

R.Srinivasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Oct 2010 01:27:04 +0530

54 lines

Re: Detergent and globular proteins

Cécile Breyton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Oct 2010 09:57:27 +0200

183 lines

Re: Detergent and globular proteins

Sally Pham Thanh Van <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Oct 2010 07:37:56 +0200

115 lines

New Thread

Diamond MX BAG Training

Diamond MX BAG Training

James Nicholson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:29:37 +0100

380 lines

New Thread

Differences between refmac_5.5 and refmac_5.2

Differences between refmac_5.5 and refmac_5.2

Hailiang Zhang <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Oct 2010 19:15:23 -0400

21 lines

Re: Differences between refmac_5.5 and refmac_5.2

Garib N Murshudov <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Oct 2010 00:36:24 +0100

38 lines

New Thread

Director of Eukaryotic Protein Production

Director of Eukaryotic Protein Production

Steve Almo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Oct 2010 19:56:07 -0400

68 lines

New Thread

diverging Rcryst and Rfree

diverging Rcryst and Rfree

Rakesh Joshi <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Oct 2010 17:10:06 -0400

17 lines

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree

Jacqueline Vitali <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Oct 2010 17:44:31 -0400

66 lines

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree

Maia Cherney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Oct 2010 16:16:28 -0600

16 lines

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree

Ethan Merritt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:54:46 -0700

40 lines

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree

Artem Evdokimov <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Oct 2010 20:36:18 -0500

60 lines

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:07:02 -0700

159 lines

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree

Artem Evdokimov <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:45:06 -0500

154 lines

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree

Alexandre OURJOUMTSEV <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 07:16:31 +0000

222 lines

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree

Tom Oldfield <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:04:57 +0100

41 lines

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree

Ian Tickle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:06:16 +0100

93 lines

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:20:53 +0100

50 lines

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:37:01 -0400

35 lines

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree

Ian Tickle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:00:34 +0100

50 lines

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree

Clemens Vonrhein <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:51:59 +0100

1395 lines

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree

Frank von Delft <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:07:18 +0100

39 lines

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree

Ian Tickle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:15:50 +0100

55 lines

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree

Maia Cherney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:21:36 -0600

63 lines

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree

Clemens Vonrhein <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:38:13 +0100

94 lines

New Thread

diverging Rcryst and Rfree [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

DUFF, Anthony <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:33:47 +1100

538 lines

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:38:56 -0700

160 lines

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Ian Tickle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:52:38 +0100

175 lines

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

DUFF, Anthony <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 12:28:33 +1100

1416 lines

Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Ian Tickle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 12:22:14 +0100

241 lines

New Thread

DLS

DLS

Mohd Shukuri Mohamad Ali <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Oct 2010 12:02:41 +0800

20 lines

Re: DLS

Debasish Chattopadhyay <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Oct 2010 12:09:54 -0500

44 lines

Re: DLS

Jürgen Bosch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Oct 2010 13:23:59 -0400

118 lines

Re: DLS

Artem Evdokimov <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Oct 2010 13:10:50 -0500

81 lines

Re: DLS

Van Den Berg, Bert <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Oct 2010 10:56:31 -0400

103 lines

Re: DLS

Anastassis Perrakis <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Oct 2010 21:00:22 +0200

182 lines

New Thread

DNA-protein complex.

DNA-protein complex.

dengzq1987 <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 Oct 2010 15:06:19 +0800

58 lines

Re: DNA-protein complex.

Poul Nissen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 Oct 2010 08:58:29 +0100

98 lines

New Thread

embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question

embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question

William Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 10:48:00 -0700

46 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question

Bernhard Rupp <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:28:27 -0700

80 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 20:30:30 +0200

100 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question

Daniel Anderson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:31:19 -0700

55 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:50:30 -0500

77 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question

Yong Y Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:57:33 -0400

75 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question

Ian Tickle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 12:34:30 +0100

108 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:24:20 +0200

156 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question

Ian Tickle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:48:00 +0100

170 lines

New Thread

embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 18:21:15 -0500

109 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

William G. Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:51:21 -0700

31 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

James Holton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 17:02:28 -0700

248 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Lijun Liu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 17:27:03 -0700

418 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 21:42:31 -0500

156 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Bernhard Rupp <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 20:07:04 -0700

34 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Lijun Liu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 22:01:19 -0700

591 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

James Holton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 22:38:07 -0700

195 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 08:41:20 +0200

63 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 10:40:09 -0400

31 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Dale Tronrud <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 09:28:48 -0700

219 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:59:34 -0500

257 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Bart Hazes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:17:42 -0600

314 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Lijun Liu <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 10:41:17 -0700

938 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

William G. Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 08:21:19 -0700

56 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Ethan Merritt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:13:49 -0700

301 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 23:31:09 +0200

114 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 17:43:09 -0400

31 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 17:45:32 -0400

22 lines

Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

William G. Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:27:48 -0700

71 lines

New Thread

Faculty Position, Dept of Molecular Biology, Princeton University

Faculty Position, Dept of Molecular Biology, Princeton University

Phil Jeffrey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:33:29 -0400

36 lines

New Thread

Fill map/mask with dummy atoms?

Fill map/mask with dummy atoms?

Dirk Kostrewa <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:00:32 +0200

34 lines

Re: Fill map/mask with dummy atoms?

Victor Lamzin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:07:22 +0200

56 lines

Fill map/mask with dummy atoms?

Tanner, John J. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 08:28:42 -0500

56 lines

Fill map/mask with dummy atoms?

Alex Shkumatov <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 23:50:38 +0000

104 lines

Re: Fill map/mask with dummy atoms?

Dirk Kostrewa <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 10:53:12 +0200

70 lines

Fill map/mask with dummy atoms?

Pavel Afonine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Oct 2010 12:16:17 -0700

158 lines

Re: Fill map/mask with dummy atoms?

Anastassis Perrakis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:32:45 +0200

243 lines

New Thread

Fluorometers

Fluorometers

Leiman Petr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 19:07:14 +0000

45 lines

New Thread

FOM: Phaser vs SigmaA

FOM: Phaser vs SigmaA

Goragot Wisedchaisri <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 16:58:34 -0700

19 lines

Re: FOM: Phaser vs SigmaA

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:51:43 +0100

29 lines

Re: FOM: Phaser vs SigmaA

Clemens Vonrhein <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:01:00 +0100

73 lines

Re: FOM: Phaser vs SigmaA

Goragot Wisedchaisri <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:43:03 -0700

87 lines

Re: FOM: Phaser vs SigmaA

Randy J. Read <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Oct 2010 00:21:26 +0100

52 lines

New Thread

Free R with doubled cell edge

Free R with doubled cell edge

Thomas Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 18:50:07 +0100

88 lines

Re: Free R with doubled cell edge

Kay Diederichs <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Oct 2010 14:22:36 +0200

229 lines

Re: Free R with doubled cell edge

Boaz Shaanan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Oct 2010 14:49:40 GMT

358 lines

Re: Free R with doubled cell edge

Ethan Merritt <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Oct 2010 10:08:43 -0700

189 lines

New Thread

FW: please post

FW: please post

Joe Ng <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:03:27 -0500

672 lines

New Thread

FW: [ccp4bb] Babinet solvent correction [WAS: R-free flag problem]

FW: [ccp4bb] Babinet solvent correction [WAS: R-free flag problem]

Simon Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Oct 2010 09:09:52 +0100

454 lines

New Thread

Fwd: [ccp4bb] Fill map/mask with dummy atoms?

Fwd: [ccp4bb] Fill map/mask with dummy atoms?

Dirk Kostrewa <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:49:53 +0200

45 lines

Re: Fwd: [ccp4bb] Fill map/mask with dummy atoms?

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:00:42 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

Fwd: [ccp4bb] Summary: measure detergent concentration

Fwd: [ccp4bb] Summary: measure detergent concentration

weikai <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 19:57:57 -0400

153 lines

New Thread

Fwd: [ccp4bb] tlsanl *NOW ALSO REFMAC* and phenix TLS results

Fwd: [ccp4bb] tlsanl *NOW ALSO REFMAC* and phenix TLS results

Bryan Lepore <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:00:59 -0400

22 lines

New Thread

Hardware question

Hardware question

Edward A. Berry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:52:51 -0400

25 lines

Re: Hardware question

Jim Fairman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 22:14:53 -0400

98 lines

Re: Hardware question

Ben Eisenbraun <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 22:26:20 -0400

60 lines

Re: Hardware question

Jürgen Bosch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 22:48:04 -0400

103 lines

Re: Hardware question

Frank von Delft <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:43:17 +0100

39 lines

Re: Hardware question

James Holton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:25:47 -0700

67 lines

Re: Hardware question

Peter Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 17:45:28 +0100

107 lines

New Thread

Help with model bias in merihedral twin

Help with model bias in merihedral twin

Peter Chan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:00:28 -0400

123 lines

New Thread

Help with model bias in merihedral twin + Refmac5

Re: Help with model bias in merihedral twin + Refmac5

Peter Chan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:59:28 -0400

455 lines

Re: Help with model bias in merihedral twin + Refmac5

Colin Nave <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Oct 2010 11:34:47 +0100

455 lines

New Thread

Help with Optimizing Crystals

Help with Optimizing Crystals

Matthew Bratkowski <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:23:23 -0400

66 lines

Re: Help with Optimizing Crystals

Van Den Berg, Bert <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:30:41 -0400

125 lines

Re: Help with Optimizing Crystals

Artem Evdokimov <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:31:29 -0500

102 lines

Re: Help with Optimizing Crystals

Jürgen Bosch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:47:51 -0400

143 lines

Re: Help with Optimizing Crystals

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:50:55 -0500

268 lines

Re: Help with Optimizing Crystals

Matthew Bratkowski <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:31:39 -0400

81 lines

Re: Help with Optimizing Crystals

Jürgen Bosch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:45:50 -0400

128 lines

Re: Help with Optimizing Crystals

James Holton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:46:56 -0700

141 lines

Re: Help with Optimizing Crystals

Annie Hassell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 08:28:24 -0500

446 lines

Re: Help with Optimizing Crystals

Matthew Bratkowski <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:31:52 -0400

466 lines

New Thread

help with pymol error message

help with pymol error message

Rakesh Joshi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 17:56:58 -0400

57 lines

Re: help with pymol error message

Jason Vertrees <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 18:16:41 -0400

108 lines

Re: help with pymol error message

Phoebe Rice <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 17:40:13 -0500

76 lines

New Thread

How to add water molecules..??

How to add water molecules..??

Hussain Bhukyagps <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Oct 2010 19:58:37 +0530

25 lines

Re: How to add water molecules..??

Frederic VELLIEUX <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Oct 2010 16:35:41 +0200

39 lines

New Thread

How to detect the concentration of detergent?

How to detect the concentration of detergent?

yybbll <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 16:28:44 +0200

79 lines

Re: How to detect the concentration of detergent?

Van Den Berg, Bert <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 10:42:37 -0400

140 lines

Re: How to detect the concentration of detergent?

Murray, James W <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 15:42:25 +0100

67 lines

Re: How to detect the concentration of detergent?

Edward A. Berry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 10:55:23 -0400

65 lines

Re: How to detect the concentration of detergent?

Owen Pornillos <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 11:09:26 -0400

184 lines

Re: How to detect the concentration of detergent?

Philipp Ellinger <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 18:50:43 +0200

258 lines

Re: How to detect the concentration of detergent?

Ho Leung Ng <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 16:34:30 -0700

17 lines

New Thread

How to get PDB of small molecule which is not available in data base..??

How to get PDB of small molecule which is not available in data base..??

Hussain Bhukyagps <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 Oct 2010 11:43:10 +0530

30 lines

Re: How to get PDB of small molecule which is not available in data base..??

Jürgen Bosch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 Oct 2010 02:23:22 -0400

77 lines

Re: How to get PDB of small molecule which is not available in data base..??

Miri Hirshberg <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 Oct 2010 08:46:20 +0000

27 lines

New Thread

I really need a file(such as .pdb) contains pseudo tanslation

I really need a file(such as .pdb) contains pseudo tanslation

Ting-Wei Jiang <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 17:19:47 +0800

46 lines

Re: I really need a file(such as .pdb) contains pseudo tanslation

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:40:41 +0100

42 lines

Re: I really need a file(such as .pdb) contains pseudo tanslation

Huanwang Yang <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:18:49 -0400

52 lines

Re: I really need a file(such as .pdb) contains pseudo tanslation

Gerard DVD Kleywegt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:56:04 +0200

67 lines

New Thread

inflated BOND_RMSD with external restraints (refmac)

inflated BOND_RMSD with external restraints (refmac)

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:51:38 -0400

38 lines

Re: inflated BOND_RMSD with external restraints (refmac)

Garib N Murshudov <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 22:04:57 +0100

64 lines

Re: inflated BOND_RMSD with external restraints (refmac)

Ian Tickle <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 10:26:37 +0100

49 lines

Re: inflated BOND_RMSD with external restraints (refmac)

Ian Tickle <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 10:54:59 +0100

39 lines

Re: inflated BOND_RMSD with external restraints (refmac)

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:22:27 -0400

77 lines

Re: inflated BOND_RMSD with external restraints (refmac)

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 12:43:06 -0400

60 lines

New Thread

Intensive 2-day School in Biological and Chemical Crystallography

Intensive 2-day School in Biological and Chemical Crystallography

John R Helliwell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Oct 2010 09:57:15 +0100

29 lines

New Thread

Is the Rmerge invalidate by twinned data?

Is the Rmerge invalidate by twinned data?

fulvio saccoccia <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Oct 2010 11:28:34 +0200

17 lines

Re: Is the Rmerge invalidate by twinned data?

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Oct 2010 10:55:22 -0400

30 lines

Re: Is the Rmerge invalidate by twinned data?

Jim Pflugrath <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Oct 2010 10:07:43 -0500

32 lines

Re: Is the Rmerge invalidate by twinned data?

Jon Schuermann <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Oct 2010 10:37:20 -0500

49 lines

New Thread

JAC (2010), 43,1242-1249

JAC (2010), 43,1242-1249

Jürgen Bosch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 22:34:28 -0400

62 lines

Re: JAC (2010), 43,1242-1249

Michel Fodje <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 09:33:01 -0600

293 lines

Re: JAC (2010), 43,1242-1249

Jürgen Bosch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 11:39:17 -0400

251 lines

New Thread

Job Opening Announcement

Job Opening Announcement

Lance Westerhoff <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Oct 2010 17:47:02 -0400

36 lines

New Thread

Lousy diffraction at home but fantastic at the synchrotron?

Re: Lousy diffraction at home but fantastic at the synchrotron?

James Holton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 09:04:05 -0700

111 lines

Re: Lousy diffraction at home but fantastic at the synchrotron?

Gunnar Olovsson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 13:51:44 -0700

262 lines

Lousy diffraction at home but fantastic at the synchrotron?

Marcus Winter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 07:41:44 -0600

979 lines

New Thread

message for CCP4bb

message for CCP4bb

Frank Kozielski <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:43:55 +0100

159 lines

New Thread

met auxotroph S.cerevisiae strain?

met auxotroph S.cerevisiae strain?

tommi kajander <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:47:21 +0300

32 lines

Re: met auxotroph S.cerevisiae strain?

Martin Hallberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:29:35 +0200

99 lines

New Thread

Milch and Minor

Milch and Minor

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:05:06 -0700

32 lines

Re: Milch and Minor

Thomas Juettemann <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:15:47 -0700

39 lines

Re: Milch and Minor

Jürgen Bosch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 22:24:11 -0400

127 lines

Re: Milch and Minor

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:51:44 -0700

42 lines

New Thread

mol rep help needed

mol rep help needed

David Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Oct 2010 11:40:13 -0400

50 lines

Re: mol rep help needed

xaravich ivan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Oct 2010 09:59:33 -0700

129 lines

Re: mol rep help needed

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Oct 2010 12:10:06 +0100

73 lines

Re: mol rep help needed

Clemens Vonrhein <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 09:54:06 +0100

47 lines

New Thread

molecule on symmetry axis

molecule on symmetry axis

Jacqueline Vitali <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 18:28:52 -0400

61 lines

Re: molecule on symmetry axis

George M. Sheldrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Oct 2010 00:41:06 +0200

53 lines

Re: molecule on symmetry axis

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Oct 2010 10:25:47 +0200

92 lines

Re: molecule on symmetry axis

Robbie Joosten <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Oct 2010 10:55:59 +0200

165 lines

Re: molecule on symmetry axis

Nicholas K. Sauter <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Oct 2010 11:44:59 -0700

85 lines

Re: molecule on symmetry axis

George M. Sheldrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Oct 2010 23:07:08 +0200

96 lines

Re: molecule on symmetry axis

Jacqueline Vitali <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 02:26:24 -0400

38 lines

New Thread

Need suggestions for protein: ligand ratio for co-crystallization

Need suggestions for protein: ligand ratio for co-crystallization

lei feng <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:09:04 -0400

73 lines

Re: Need suggestions for protein: ligand ratio for co-crystallization

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 10:08:34 -0400

60 lines

New Thread

New Free Molecular Graphics and Presentation Software

New Free Molecular Graphics and Presentation Software

Andrew Orry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 12:58:47 -0700

71 lines

New Thread

New home for Science, Nature, Phys.Rev.B.

New home for Science, Nature, Phys.Rev.B.

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Oct 2010 19:18:22 -0700

40 lines

New Thread

No TABFUN in Amore

No TABFUN in Amore

Claudine Bisson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Oct 2010 14:29:50 +0100

34 lines

New Thread

NUVISION 60GX glasses/emitters

NUVISION 60GX glasses/emitters

David Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 13:59:21 -0400

29 lines

New Thread

oligomer ligand building

oligomer ligand building

Changyi Xue <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:12:29 -0400

68 lines

Re: oligomer ligand building

Paul Holland <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 20:53:28 +0100

25 lines

Re: oligomer ligand building

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 22:31:16 +0100

34 lines

Re: oligomer ligand building

Garib N Murshudov <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 23:02:59 +0100

98 lines

New Thread

open positions in protein engineering at UCSF

open positions in protein engineering at UCSF

xiaokun shu <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Oct 2010 10:12:42 -0700

48 lines

New Thread

peculiar twinning case

peculiar twinning case

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 18:08:09 -0400

69 lines

Re: peculiar twinning case

Gerard Bricogne <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Oct 2010 22:55:53 +0100

98 lines

New Thread

Position as Postdoctoral Research Fellow - in membrane proteins structural biology , Oslo Norway

Position as Postdoctoral Research Fellow - in membrane proteins structural biology , Oslo Norway

Preben Morth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:37:45 +0200

556 lines

New Thread

Positions available

Positions available

naalas horced <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 04:33:03 +0900

74 lines

Positions available

Leo Chavas <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 04:39:29 +0900

74 lines

Positions available

Chavas Leo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 06:36:24 +0900

40 lines

New Thread

Positions available at the High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) - Japan

Positions available at the High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) - Japan

naalas horced <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:23:49 +0900

68 lines

New Thread

Post-Doctoral Position in Structural Biology

Post-Doctoral Position in Structural Biology

Thirumananseri Kumarevel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 11:14:45 +0900

265 lines

POST-DOCTORAL POSITION in STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY

Thirumananseri Kumarevel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 03:24:24 +0100

23 lines

New Thread

postdoc position in cryo-EM method development

postdoc position in cryo-EM method development

Sjors Scheres <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Oct 2010 10:47:58 +0100

54 lines

New Thread

Postdoctoral Position Available

Postdoctoral Position Available

Richard Baxter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 17:14:13 +0100

42 lines

New Thread

Postdoctoral Position in Barcelona

Postdoctoral Position in Barcelona

"F.Xavier Gomis-Rüth" <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:33:32 +0200

1340 lines

New Thread

Postdoctoral position in membrane protein crystallography at Vanderbilt University

Postdoctoral position in membrane protein crystallography at Vanderbilt University

Iverson, Tina M <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Oct 2010 15:52:54 -0500

118 lines

New Thread

Postdoctoral position in Toulouse, France

Postdoctoral position in Toulouse, France

Jean-Denis PEDELACQ <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 10:29:09 +0200

34 lines

New Thread

Postdoctoral positions available

Postdoctoral positions available

Liang Tang <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Oct 2010 14:23:55 -0500

37 lines

New Thread

Postdoctotal Position in Barcelona (erratum)

Postdoctotal Position in Barcelona (erratum)

"F.Xavier Gomis-Rüth" <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:46:14 +0200

1351 lines

New Thread

Problem installing CCP4 on MacOSX behind firewall?

Problem installing CCP4 on MacOSX behind firewall?

Mads Gabrielsen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 10:20:17 +0100

37 lines

Re: Problem installing CCP4 on MacOSX behind firewall?

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:30:31 +0200

91 lines

Re: Problem installing CCP4 on MacOSX behind firewall?

William Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 09:39:45 -0700

67 lines

New Thread

protein ligand energy

protein ligand energy

Rex Palmer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 12:43:49 +0100

50 lines

Re: protein ligand energy

Vellieux Frederic <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:56:48 +0200

41 lines

Re: protein ligand energy

John R Helliwell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:30:09 +0100

40 lines

Re: protein ligand energy

Christina Bourne <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:13:14 -0700

63 lines

Re: protein ligand energy

Robert Esnouf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:15:47 +0100

59 lines

Re: protein ligand energy

Martyn Winn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:35:51 +0100

87 lines

Re: protein ligand energy

John R Helliwell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 08:57:50 +0100

114 lines

New Thread

Pseudo-symmetry/refinement

Pseudo-symmetry/refinement

Mike John <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Oct 2010 00:48:30 -0400

84 lines

Re: Pseudo-symmetry/refinement

Esko Oksanen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Oct 2010 10:03:47 +0200

39 lines

Re: Pseudo-symmetry/refinement

Seema Nath <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Oct 2010 18:23:27 +0100

15 lines

Re: Pseudo-symmetry/refinement

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 10:05:54 +0100

39 lines

Re: Pseudo-symmetry/refinement

Esko Oksanen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:02:03 +0200

38 lines

New Thread

quantum diffraction

quantum diffraction

James Holton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:37:11 -0700

63 lines

Re: quantum diffraction

Bernhard Rupp <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 11:27:37 -0700

34 lines

Re: quantum diffraction

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:37:19 -0500

48 lines

Re: quantum diffraction

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:43:38 -0500

19 lines

Re: quantum diffraction

Bernhard Rupp <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 12:04:59 -0700

34 lines

Re: quantum diffraction

Bart Hazes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:38:42 -0600

45 lines

Re: quantum diffraction

Bart Hazes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:44:15 -0600

50 lines

Re: quantum diffraction

Bryan Lepore <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 16:07:24 -0400

13 lines

Re: quantum diffraction

Dale Tronrud <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:14:59 -0700

49 lines

Re: quantum diffraction

Bernhard Rupp <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:41:45 -0700

28 lines

Re: quantum diffraction

Bart Hazes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 15:23:36 -0600

59 lines

Re: quantum diffraction

Bernhard Rupp <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Oct 2010 08:36:13 -0700

22 lines

Re: quantum diffraction

Jürgen Bosch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Oct 2010 12:22:59 -0400

93 lines

New Thread

que fem sobre això miquel? es veu que l'Esther Cid en el seu dia ja ho va enviar.

Re: que fem sobre això miquel? es veu que l'Esther Cid en el seu dia ja ho va enviar.

Esther Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:20:11 +0200

223 lines

New Thread

Question regarding S-SAD

Question regarding S-SAD

Kornelius Zeth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:03:53 +0200

29 lines

Re: Question regarding S-SAD

Dirk Kostrewa <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:11:51 +0200

75 lines

Re: Question regarding S-SAD

Clemens Vonrhein <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:28:03 +0100

93 lines

New Thread

R factor & R free struck

R factor & R free struck

Jack Russel <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Oct 2010 19:56:18 -0700

51 lines

Re: R factor & R free struck

Poul Nissen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Oct 2010 09:09:16 +0200

89 lines

Re: R factor & R free struck

Anastassis Perrakis <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Oct 2010 10:57:02 +0200

145 lines

Re: R factor & R free struck

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Oct 2010 12:15:38 +0100

37 lines

Re: R factor & R free struck

J. Preben Morth <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Oct 2010 19:34:44 +0200

110 lines

Re: R factor & R free struck

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 09:47:43 +0100

46 lines

Re: R factor & R free struck

Ian Tickle <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 10:27:10 +0100

52 lines

Re: R factor & R free struck

J. Preben Morth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 11:50:37 +0200

110 lines

Re: R factor & R free struck

Steven Sheriff <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 23:03:53 +0100

25 lines

Re: R factor & R free struck

Roger Rowlett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Oct 2010 08:33:16 -0400

56 lines

New Thread

R-free flag problem

Re: R-free flag problem

Vinson LIANG <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:33:03 +0800

140 lines

Re: R-free flag problem

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:37:13 +0200

155 lines

Re: R-free flag problem

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:07:48 -0400

144 lines

Re: R-free flag problem

Vinson LIANG <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Oct 2010 11:55:14 +0800

193 lines

New Thread

R-free flag problem.

R-free flag problem.

Vinson LIANG <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:50:04 +0800

64 lines

Re: R-free flag problem.

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:41:30 +0200

96 lines

New Thread

Radiation damage with crystals containing metal centers (TaBr people chime in?)

Radiation damage with crystals containing metal centers (TaBr people chime in?)

Francis E Reyes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 10:28:35 -0600

49 lines

Re: Radiation damage with crystals containing metal centers (TaBr people chime in?)

Phil Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 17:34:10 +0100

58 lines

Re: Radiation damage with crystals containing metal centers (TaBr people chime in?)

Dunten, Pete W. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 11:25:20 -0700

68 lines

Re: Radiation damage with crystals containing metal centers (TaBr people chime in?)

Poul Nissen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 21:21:50 +0200

69 lines

Re: Radiation damage with crystals containing metal centers (TaBr people chime in?)

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 14:48:53 -0500

56 lines

Re: Radiation damage with crystals containing metal centers (TaBr people chime in?)

Poul Nissen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 22:04:06 +0200

52 lines

Re: Radiation damage with crystals containing metal centers (TaBr people chime in?)

J. Preben Morth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Oct 2010 10:34:54 +0200

76 lines

New Thread

RE : [ccp4bb] Babinet solvent correction [WAS: R-free flag problem]

RE : [ccp4bb] Babinet solvent correction [WAS: R-free flag problem]

Alexandre OURJOUMTSEV <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Oct 2010 22:04:46 +0000

30 lines

New Thread

RE : [ccp4bb] vector and scalars

RE : [ccp4bb] vector and scalars

Alexandre OURJOUMTSEV <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 19:45:41 +0000

27 lines

New Thread

Real space refinement [was: Against Method (R)]

Re: Real space refinement [was: Against Method (R)]

Pavel Afonine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:57:37 -0700

73 lines

New Thread

Refinement

Refinement

Jyotica Batra <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 00:39:26 +0100

26 lines

Re: Refinement

Jürgen Bosch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 20:46:18 -0400

134 lines

Re: Refinement

Jim Fairman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 21:36:29 -0400

81 lines

Re: Refinement

Vellieux Frederic <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 09:15:16 +0200

54 lines

Re: Refinement

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:56:32 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

refining structures with engineered disulfide bonds

refining structures with engineered disulfide bonds

Seema Mittal <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:40:42 -0400

81 lines

Re: refining structures with engineered disulfide bonds

Frederic VELLIEUX <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 23:34:08 +0200

101 lines

Re: refining structures with engineered disulfide bonds

Bart Hazes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:50:24 -0600

148 lines

Re: refining structures with engineered disulfide bonds

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:48:51 +0100

44 lines

New Thread

Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed

Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed

Christian Roth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:01:10 +0200

159 lines

Re: Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed

Ethan Merritt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 10:50:10 -0700

183 lines

Re: Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed

Christian Roth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 22:04:49 +0200

196 lines

Re: Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed

Ethan Merritt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:48:15 -0700

216 lines

Re: Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed

Pavel Afonine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 12:31:13 -0700

28 lines

Re: Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:38:51 +0200

296 lines

Re: Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed

Ethan Merritt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 12:50:53 -0700

58 lines

Re: Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed

Pavel Afonine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 12:52:03 -0700

28 lines

Re: Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed

Pavel Afonine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 13:10:43 -0700

146 lines

Re: Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 22:31:24 +0200

89 lines

Re: Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed

Garib N Murshudov <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 22:05:11 +0100

317 lines

Re: Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed

Pete Meyer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:12:04 -0500

236 lines

Re: Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed

Garib N Murshudov <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 01:43:17 +0100

274 lines

Re: Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed

Christian Roth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:32:09 +0200

72 lines

New Thread

Reg. PATCH-ERR in CNS

Reg. PATCH-ERR in CNS

Thangavelu K <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 18:44:55 +0800

378 lines

Re: Reg. PATCH-ERR in CNS

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 16:00:06 +0200

495 lines

New Thread

Regarding space group P1, P21

Regarding space group P1, P21

Mohinder Pal <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:05:42 +0100

38 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Vellieux Frederic <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:12:26 +0200

47 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Harry Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:28:10 +0000

74 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:04:36 -0400

52 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:31:51 +0200

100 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Clemens Vonrhein <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:36:51 +0100

50 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Christina Bourne <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 08:46:23 -0700

80 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Clemens Vonrhein <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:57:19 +0100

68 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

James Holton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 08:55:45 -0700

191 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:18:31 -0400

100 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:34:58 -0500

305 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Ronald E Stenkamp <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:51:50 -0700

150 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Ethan Merritt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:53:00 -0700

112 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:57:33 -0400

141 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:58:37 -0500

41 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Clemens Vonrhein <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 18:59:49 +0100

74 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:10:59 -0400

25 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Clemens Vonrhein <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:19:05 +0100

69 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:19:34 -0400

63 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Clemens Vonrhein <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:24:57 +0100

44 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:38:55 -0500

60 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Ian Tickle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 20:00:38 +0100

111 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Ian Tickle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 20:43:31 +0100

163 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Ethan Merritt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:03:21 -0700

93 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Phil Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 21:45:34 +0100

130 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Pal M. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:16:08 +0100

150 lines

Re: Regarding space group P1, P21

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:04:15 +0100

115 lines

New Thread

Reindexing scaled data

Reindexing scaled data

Daniel Bonsor <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Oct 2010 20:34:44 +0100

31 lines

Re: Reindexing scaled data

Jürgen Bosch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Oct 2010 15:45:09 -0400

118 lines

Re: Reindexing scaled data

Ethan Merritt <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Oct 2010 12:46:07 -0700

43 lines

Re: Reindexing scaled data

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 10:12:12 +0100

75 lines

New Thread

Removing a tight binding ligand

Removing a tight binding ligand

SIPPEL,KATHERINE H <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Oct 2010 21:05:12 -0400

39 lines

Re: Removing a tight binding ligand

Daniel Bonsor <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Oct 2010 04:13:52 +0100

44 lines

Re: Removing a tight binding ligand

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Oct 2010 22:18:54 -0500

50 lines

Re: Removing a tight binding ligand

Nian Huang <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Oct 2010 00:32:40 -0500

53 lines

Re: Removing a tight binding ligand

Joseph Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Oct 2010 11:01:29 -0400

48 lines

Re: Removing a tight binding ligand

Mathews, Irimpan I. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Oct 2010 08:27:10 -0700

58 lines

Re: Removing a tight binding ligand

Nadir T. Mrabet <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Oct 2010 18:10:37 +0200

61 lines

Re: Removing a tight binding ligand

Joseph Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Oct 2010 12:20:39 -0400

80 lines

Re: Removing a tight binding ligand

SIPPEL,KATHERINE H <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Oct 2010 13:48:02 -0400

126 lines

New Thread

resolution limit stuck in Refmac5

resolution limit stuck in Refmac5

Tom Huxford <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:46:45 -0700

50 lines

Re: resolution limit stuck in Refmac5

Nat Echols <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:56:05 -0700

87 lines

New Thread

rigorously compatible coordinate files

Re: rigorously compatible coordinate files

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:26:17 +0100

24 lines

New Thread

Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Robbie Joosten <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:29:06 +0200

54 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Jürgen Bosch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:04:51 -0400

86 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 12:11:36 -0700

96 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Simon Kolstoe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 21:01:27 +0100

136 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

VAN RAAIJ , MARK JOHAN <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 22:56:55 +0200

317 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 17:20:40 -0400

167 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:22:44 -0700

445 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Nat Echols <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:40:00 -0700

56 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:02:52 -0700

316 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:11:06 -0700

184 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:13:03 -0700

149 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Phoebe Rice <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 17:50:39 -0500

168 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 20:01:55 -0500

190 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:22:28 -0700

233 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Dima Klenchin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 20:58:35 -0500

35 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Artem Evdokimov <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 21:12:24 -0500

59 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:28:49 +0100

133 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Vellieux Frederic <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:30:54 +0200

40 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Simon Kolstoe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:26:39 +0100

173 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:21:24 -0700

158 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Zbyszek Otwinowski <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 19:40:51 -0500

1689 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Jim Pflugrath <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 19:56:57 -0500

72 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)

Mischa Machius <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 20:59:39 -0400

161 lines

New Thread

Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree) - Problems with Publishing

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree) - Problems with Publishing

Felix Frolow <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 22:53:49 +0200

2828 lines

New Thread

Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree) [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree) [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

DUFF, Anthony <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:43:16 +1100

81 lines

Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree) [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

DUFF, Anthony <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 19:52:13 +1100

570 lines

New Thread

shape complementarity

shape complementarity

Reiner Ribarics <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 15:01:19 +0100

55 lines

Re: shape complementarity

Mike Lawrence <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Oct 2010 09:26:45 +1100

74 lines

New Thread

Source for trimethyl lead acetate

Source for trimethyl lead acetate

matthew vetting <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:54:42 -0400

13 lines

Re: Source for trimethyl lead acetate

Martin Hallberg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 20:58:11 +0200

64 lines

New Thread

spread out

spread out

Esther Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:23:32 +0200

42661 lines

New Thread

spread out. .

spread out. .

Esther Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:23:32 +0200

42662 lines

New Thread

stereo (again - sigh)

stereo (again - sigh)

David Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Oct 2010 12:11:19 -0400

42 lines

Re: stereo (again - sigh)

Ben Eisenbraun <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Oct 2010 12:25:16 -0400

41 lines

Re: stereo (again - sigh)

Harry Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Oct 2010 17:37:07 +0000

66 lines

Re: stereo (again - sigh)

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 5 Oct 2010 20:21:04 +0200

84 lines

Re: stereo (again - sigh)

David Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Oct 2010 15:14:03 -0400

80 lines

Re: stereo (again - sigh)

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Oct 2010 11:23:22 +0200

101 lines

New Thread

Strange spots

Strange spots

David Goldstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:08:15 +0100

9737 lines

Re: Strange spots

John R Helliwell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 18:41:51 +0100

45 lines

Re: Strange spots

Gerard Bricogne <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 18:44:43 +0100

72 lines

Re: Strange spots

Jrh <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:01:48 +0100

82 lines

Re: Strange spots

Julian Nomme <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:10:15 -0500

93 lines

Re: Strange spots

Soisson, Stephen M <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:49:41 -0400

148 lines

Re: Strange spots

Marcus Winter <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:56:28 -0600

305 lines

Re: Strange spots

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:59:40 -0500

368 lines

Re: Strange spots

Sanishvili, Ruslan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:08:51 -0500

714 lines

Re: Strange spots

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:13:12 -0500

678 lines

Re: Strange spots

Leiman Petr <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 20:14:08 +0000

37 lines

Re: Strange spots

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 21:13:27 +0100

164 lines

Re: Strange spots

Ethan Merritt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:25:15 -0700

35 lines

Re: Strange spots

Van Den Berg, Bert <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:37:03 -0400

82 lines

Re: Strange spots

Bryan Lepore <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:55:09 -0400

23 lines

Re: Strange spots

Gerard Bricogne <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 22:03:12 +0100

172 lines

Re: Strange spots

Konstantin v. Korotkov <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:17:29 -0700

9748 lines

Re: Strange spots

Charles W. Carter, Jr <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 23:23:32 +0200

1297 lines

Re: Strange spots

Bart Hazes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:05:33 -0600

67 lines

Re: Strange spots

Jim Pflugrath <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:13:22 -0500

15 lines

Re: Strange spots

Julian Nomme <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:30:45 -0500

210 lines

Re: Strange spots

James Holton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:03:42 -0700

97 lines

Re: Strange spots

Edward Snell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 20:23:09 -0400

249 lines

Re: Strange spots

John R Helliwell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Oct 2010 09:16:35 +0100

4273 lines

Re: Strange spots

Felix Frolow <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Oct 2010 10:31:41 +0200

70 lines

Re: Strange spots

Jürgen Bosch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Oct 2010 12:06:11 -0400

7069 lines

Re: Strange spots

John R Helliwell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 Oct 2010 12:46:56 +0000

110 lines

Re: Strange spots

Colin Nave <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 Oct 2010 16:41:15 -0000

130 lines

New Thread

Strange spots - In book of John Helliwell

Re: Strange spots - In book of John Helliwell

Felix Frolow <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Oct 2010 09:58:19 +0200

627 lines

New Thread

Summary : [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question

Summary : [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question

William Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:58:56 -0700

83 lines

Re: Summary : [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 00:09:44 +0200

168 lines

Re: Summary : [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question

Lijun Liu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:18:05 -0700

358 lines

Re: Summary : [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question

William G. Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 18:10:06 -0700

152 lines

New Thread

Sweet and discreet tweets about helices and sheets - @PDBeurope

Sweet and discreet tweets about helices and sheets - @PDBeurope

Gerard DVD Kleywegt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 19:10:19 +0200

33 lines

New Thread

Takeda San Diego, Scientist, Membrane Protein Chemistry

Takeda San Diego, Scientist, Membrane Protein Chemistry

Tatone, Josephine (TPNA) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:58:04 -0500

56 lines

New Thread

tlsanl *NOW ALSO REFMAC* and phenix TLS results

Re: tlsanl *NOW ALSO REFMAC* and phenix TLS results

Bryan Lepore <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:55:38 -0400

46 lines

Re: tlsanl *NOW ALSO REFMAC* and phenix TLS results

Ian Tickle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:42:10 +0100

85 lines

Re: tlsanl *NOW ALSO REFMAC* and phenix TLS results

Ian Tickle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 18:27:24 +0100

64 lines

New Thread

tlsanl and phenix TLS results

tlsanl and phenix TLS results

Bryan Lepore <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 08:26:38 -0400

34 lines

Re: tlsanl and phenix TLS results

Ian Tickle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:01:35 +0100

54 lines

New Thread

Too many microcrystals.......

Too many microcrystals.......

Dilip Badgujar <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Oct 2010 06:15:44 -0000

59 lines

Re: Too many microcrystals.......

Jürgen Bosch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Oct 2010 02:41:21 -0400

129 lines

Re: Too many microcrystals.......

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Oct 2010 12:23:09 +0200

80 lines

Re: Too many microcrystals.......

Sanishvili, Ruslan <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Oct 2010 08:49:18 -0500

328 lines

Re: Too many microcrystals.......

Laurie Betts <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Oct 2010 16:24:30 -0500

126 lines

New Thread

Twin - Data reduction and refinement in Refmac

Twin - Data reduction and refinement in Refmac

Peter Chan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:01:55 -0400

125 lines

Re: Twin - Data reduction and refinement in Refmac

Garib N Murshudov <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 21:51:57 +0100

166 lines

Re: Twin - Data reduction and refinement in Refmac

Peter Chan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 18:41:17 -0400

328 lines

Re: Twin - Data reduction and refinement in Refmac

Peter Chan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 18:46:21 -0400

201 lines

Re: Twin - Data reduction and refinement in Refmac

Peter Chan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 19:05:49 -0400

369 lines

Re: Twin - Data reduction and refinement in Refmac

Garib N Murshudov <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 23:55:56 +0100

410 lines

New Thread

Twinned data

Twinned data

Clayton, Gina Martyn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Oct 2010 15:18:02 -0400

53 lines

Re: Twinned data

George M. Sheldrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Oct 2010 00:35:09 +0200

78 lines

Re: Twinned data

Clayton, Gina Martyn <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 09:40:26 -0400

141 lines

Re: Twinned data

Clayton, Gina Martyn <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 09:55:15 -0400

259 lines

New Thread

twinning and refmac

twinning and refmac

Arnon Lavie <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:33:02 -0500

56 lines

Re: twinning and refmac

Garib N Murshudov <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 21:45:56 +0100

77 lines

New Thread

unknown density

unknown density

Priscila Oliveira de Giuseppe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Oct 2010 08:12:12 -0300

166548 lines

Re: unknown density

Vellieux Frederic <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Oct 2010 15:20:00 +0200

74 lines

Re: unknown density

Priscila Oliveira de Giuseppe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Oct 2010 11:38:53 -0300

61 lines

Re: unknown density

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 1 Oct 2010 17:21:31 +0200

136 lines

Re: unknown density

Robbie Joosten <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Oct 2010 17:55:05 +0200

105 lines

New Thread

unknown ligand density

unknown ligand density

Matthew Merski <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Oct 2010 10:27:23 -0700

69 lines

New Thread

update REFMAC

update REFMAC

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:08:55 -0400

30 lines

Re: update REFMAC

Ben Eisenbraun <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 22:45:27 -0400

56 lines

Re: update REFMAC

Boaz Shaanan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Oct 2010 13:24:26 GMT

235 lines

New Thread

update--degradation of MBP fusion protein

update--degradation of MBP fusion protein

Jerry McCully <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 17:12:34 -0700

77 lines

Re: update--degradation of MBP fusion protein

Ho Leung Ng <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:06:53 -0700

19 lines

New Thread

vector and scalars

Re: vector and scalars

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 10:22:59 -0400

151 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Ganesh Natrajan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:47:40 +0200

63 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Joseph Cockburn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 17:02:54 +0200

178 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Ian Tickle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:03:26 +0100

77 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Joseph Cockburn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 17:14:42 +0200

89 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:22:15 -0400

84 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Ganesh Natrajan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 17:52:22 +0200

109 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Ian Tickle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:58:23 +0100

129 lines

Re: vector and scalars

James Holton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 09:11:50 -0700

90 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Ethan Merritt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 10:14:46 -0700

115 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 12:23:27 -0500

20 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 13:38:39 -0400

29 lines

Re: vector and scalars

David Schuller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 08:56:35 -0400

30 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Douglas Theobald <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 11:20:04 -0400

154 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Ganesh Natrajan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 17:37:56 +0200

56 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Douglas Theobald <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 12:17:59 -0400

158 lines

Re: vector and scalars

William G. Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:14:22 -0700

25 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 11:25:41 -0500

20 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Douglas Theobald <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 12:30:16 -0400

113 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Frances C. Bernstein <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 12:51:59 -0400

42 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Ian Tickle <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 17:40:57 +0100

96 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Douglas Theobald <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 15:11:48 -0400

190 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Ian Tickle <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 23:55:54 +0100

159 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Oct 2010 09:50:56 +0200

211 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Ian Tickle <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Oct 2010 20:32:34 +0100

251 lines

Re: vector and scalars

James Stroud <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Oct 2010 12:45:50 -0700

23 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Douglas Theobald <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Oct 2010 16:14:22 -0400

388 lines

Re: vector and scalars

Ian Tickle <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Oct 2010 21:17:12 +0100

221 lines

New Thread

Webinar -- "Scientific inquiry, inference and critical reasoning in the macromolecular crystallography curriculum"

Webinar -- "Scientific inquiry, inference and critical reasoning in the macromolecular crystallography curriculum"

Angela Criswell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 12:28:06 -0500

66 lines

New Thread

what package provides libg2c.so.0 on Ubuntu ?

what package provides libg2c.so.0 on Ubuntu ?

Edward A. Berry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 00:05:32 -0400

27 lines

Re: what package provides libg2c.so.0 on Ubuntu ?

Francois Berenger <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:26:44 +0900

36 lines

Re: what package provides libg2c.so.0 on Ubuntu ?

Vellieux Frederic <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:07:07 +0200

60 lines

Re: what package provides libg2c.so.0 on Ubuntu ?

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:59:44 +0200

89 lines

Re: what package provides libg2c.so.0 on Ubuntu ?

Leiman Petr <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:13:09 +0000

56 lines

Re: what package provides libg2c.so.0 on Ubuntu ?

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:26:49 +0200

91 lines

New Thread

what package provides libg2c.so.0 on Ubuntu ? - solved

Re: what package provides libg2c.so.0 on Ubuntu ? - solved

Edward A. Berry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:04:41 -0400

73 lines

Re: what package provides libg2c.so.0 on Ubuntu ? - solved

Stephen Weeks <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 21:15:37 +0200

206 lines

New Thread

which Linux workstation for crystallography to buy?

which Linux workstation for crystallography to buy?

Benini Stefano (P) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:28:28 +0200

121 lines

Re: which Linux workstation for crystallography to buy?

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:48:54 +0200

145 lines

Re: which Linux workstation for crystallography to buy?

Vellieux Frederic <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:46:10 +0200

112 lines

Re: which Linux workstation for crystallography to buy?

Paul Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 06:03:55 -0700

148 lines

Re: which Linux workstation for crystallography to buy?

David Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:00:05 -0400

253 lines

Re: which Linux workstation for crystallography to buy?

Roger Rowlett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:08:09 -0400

228 lines

New Thread

Which version CCP4 output DFc colume in SIGMAA?

Which version CCP4 output DFc colume in SIGMAA?

Hailiang Zhang <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:56:07 -0400

17 lines

New Thread

Zalman

Zalman

Sickmier, Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Oct 2010 08:57:07 -0700

129 lines

Re: Zalman

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Oct 2010 18:51:36 +0200

71 lines

Re: Zalman

William Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Oct 2010 13:05:09 -0700

64 lines

Re: Zalman

AMIT <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Oct 2010 14:07:56 +0530

29 lines

Re: Zalman

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Oct 2010 10:30:52 +0100

30 lines

Re: Zalman

Bernhard C. Lohkamp <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Oct 2010 12:34:08 +0200

33 lines

New Thread

[OFF-TOPIC] Science is Vital.

[OFF-TOPIC] Science is Vital.

David Briggs <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Oct 2010 07:02:38 +0100

52 lines

New Thread

[OT]:Android

[OT]:Android

Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.) <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Oct 2010 18:41:09 -0700

48 lines

Re: [OT]:Android

Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Oct 2010 22:43:37 -0700

24 lines

New Thread

[QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Re: [QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Lijun Liu <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 12:12:18 -0700

1384 lines

Re: [QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Ethan Merritt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 12:34:44 -0700

374 lines

Re: [QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Bart Hazes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:18:04 -0600

64 lines

Re: [QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Ethan Merritt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 13:43:50 -0700

231 lines

Re: [QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:28:26 -0500

69 lines

Re: [QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 23:42:18 +0200

61 lines

Re: [QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Ethan Merritt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:47:23 -0700

34 lines

Re: [QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

William G. Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 20:33:53 -0700

49 lines

Re: [QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

James Holton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:44:33 -0700

70 lines

Re: [QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)

Kay Diederichs <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Oct 2010 00:04:14 +0200

182 lines

New Thread

[QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another) - Counting statistics

Re: [QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another) - Counting statistics

Felix Frolow <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 23:50:11 +0200

63 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager