JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


September 2010


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

A club claiming Sec 32(2)(a) exemption

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Sep 2010 20:16:59 +0100

42 lines

Re: A club claiming Sec 32(2)(a) exemption

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Sep 2010 09:54:26 +0100

77 lines

Re: A club claiming Sec 32(2)(a) exemption

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Sep 2010 09:59:52 +0100

142 lines

Re: A club claiming Sec 32(2)(a) exemption

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:42:40 +0100

176 lines

Re: A club claiming Sec 32(2)(a) exemption

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:50:37 +0100

205 lines

Re: A club claiming Sec 32(2)(a) exemption

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:05:29 +0100

223 lines

Adv - Email and Internet Monitoring Workshop

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:22:15 +0100

58 lines

ADV: Update session and Privacy Impact Assessment in October

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:01:26 +0100

287 lines

Bavarian Lager and TGI Cases

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:37:38 +0100

45 lines

Bavarian Lager Cases - and FOI requests to personal data your receive

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:38:53 +0100

44 lines

Re: Bavarian Lager Cases - and FOI requests to personal data your receive

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:59:09 +0100

108 lines

Re: Bavarian Lager Cases - and FOI requests to personal data your receive

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Sep 2010 08:34:44 +0100

82 lines

BMA security warning

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:39:24 +0100

36 lines

Capturing Mac Addresses

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 10:44:02 +0100

43 lines

Re: Capturing Mac Addresses

Dodgson, Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 10:53:49 +0100

86 lines

Re: Capturing Mac Addresses

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:11:43 +0100

189 lines

CCTV Creep

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 15:26:16 +0100

41 lines

Re: CCTV Creep

Dinsdale, Peter <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 15:39:42 +0100

97 lines

Re: CCTV Creep

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:51:02 +0100

84 lines

Re: CCTV Creep

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Sep 2010 20:27:13 +0100

51 lines

CCTV Dangers

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Sep 2010 15:38:01 +0100

43 lines

CCTV in Schools

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 21:07:31 +0100

31 lines

Re: CCTV in Schools

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:16:19 +0100

72 lines

Re: CCTV in Schools

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:57:04 +0100

153 lines

Coalition Government chooses to minimise privacy protection against spammers and behavioural advertisers

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 01:40:25 +0100

259 lines

Code of Practice

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Sep 2010 11:09:54 +0100

32 lines

Re: Code of Practice

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Sep 2010 19:46:04 +0100

182 lines

Cut off point for data supplied

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:41:17 +0100

31 lines

Re: Cut off point for data supplied

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:44:37 +0100

89 lines

Re: Cut off point for data supplied

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:46:48 +0100

48 lines

Re: Cut off point for data supplied

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:54:57 +0100

120 lines

Data Breaches

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:09:01 +0100

255 lines

Re: Data Breaches

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:35:49 +0100

493 lines

Re: Data Breaches

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:59:17 +0100

360 lines

Re: Data Breaches

Chris Spray <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 19:53:47 +0100

764 lines

Data Protection Poster outlining the public's rights under the Act

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:31:31 +0100

53 lines

Re: Data Protection Poster outlining the public's rights under the Act

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:53:37 +0100

147 lines

Re: Data Protection Poster outlining the public's rights under the Act

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 11:46:48 +0100

210 lines

Disciplinary Sanctions

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 14:14:30 +0100

46 lines

Re: Disciplinary Sanctions

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 15:04:19 +0100

81 lines

Re: Disciplinary Sanctions

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 16:12:11 +0100

153 lines

Disclosure of anonymous letters

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:48:02 +0100

36 lines

Re: Disclosure of anonymous letters

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:55:10 +0100

170 lines

Re: Disclosure of anonymous letters

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:58:41 +0100

709 lines

Re: Disclosure of anonymous letters

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 11:10:53 +0100

704 lines

Re: Disclosure of anonymous letters

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 11:54:15 +0100

902 lines

Re: Disclosure of anonymous letters

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:44:32 +0100

659 lines

Re: Disclosure of anonymous letters

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:17:47 +0100

424 lines

Re: Disclosure of anonymous letters

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:43:59 +0100

324 lines

Re: Disclosure of anonymous letters

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:50:53 +0100

511 lines

Re: Disclosure of anonymous letters

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:16:08 +0100

728 lines

Re: Disclosure of anonymous letters

Jane Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:26:37 +0100

935 lines

Re: Disclosure of anonymous letters

Paula Tighe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 14:16:34 +0100

845 lines

Re: Disclosure of anonymous letters

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 14:24:40 +0100

874 lines

Dogs, Owners and Privacy

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:15:21 +0100

42 lines

Dogs, Owners and Privacy

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:08:09 +0100

51 lines

Re: Dogs, Owners and Privacy

Ward, Ciaran <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:22:53 +0100

112 lines

Re: Dogs, Owners and Privacy

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:10:19 +0100

76 lines

Re: Dogs, Owners and Privacy

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:39:13 +0100

154 lines

Re: Dogs, Owners and Privacy

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:32:58 +0100

92 lines

External Auditors

Giles, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:18:46 +0100

339 lines

Re: External Auditors

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 10:33:53 +0100

646 lines

Fair Processing

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 12:57:10 +0100

48 lines

Re: Fair Processing

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 14:35:25 +0100

97 lines

FOI Update Webcast

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:38:10 +0100

43 lines

FOI Update Webcast Today

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 07:59:39 +0100

48 lines

Re: FOI Update Webcast Yesterday

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 07:26:14 +0100

43 lines

Fw: Santas on the Run

Dave and Suzy <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:27:32 +0100

622 lines

Guest Scan

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Sep 2010 12:21:45 +0100

35 lines

Re: Guest Scan

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:16:03 +0100

97 lines

Re: Guest Scan

Dinsdale, Peter <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:40:05 +0100

165 lines

Re: Guest Scan[Scanned]

Ronan Durnin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Sep 2010 12:34:35 +0100

54 lines

Hierarchy of employees by job title and rank

Ward, Ciaran <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Sep 2010 16:36:51 +0100

316 lines

How did we miss this gem from 2009?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 16:51:19 +0100

112 lines

Information Security Conference Opportunity

Cate White <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:53:41 +0100

39 lines

Interesting Stories

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:21:31 +0100

54 lines

Internal sharing of clients' data

Lynn Wyeth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Sep 2010 10:38:51 +0100

54 lines

Re: Internal sharing of clients' data

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:09:47 +0100

123 lines

Re: Internal sharing of clients' data

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Sep 2010 12:27:18 +0100

159 lines

Job advert - King's College London

Garrod, Peter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Sep 2010 22:09:10 +0100

53 lines

Law firm in data leak

Jonathan Baines <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:57:51 +0100

52 lines

Re: Law firm in data leak

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:25:26 +0100

216 lines

Re: Law firm in data leak

Mark Brookes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:05:27 +0100

45 lines

Re: Law firm in data leak

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Sep 2010 21:49:06 +0100

36 lines

Re: Law firm in data leak

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Sep 2010 21:55:40 +0100

171 lines

Man in Court for Removing CCTV Camera

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 13:00:04 +0100

34 lines

Mobile Advert

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Sep 2010 17:16:41 +0100

38 lines

Re: Mobile Advert

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 09:09:37 +0100

104 lines

NI Numbers Licence

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 10:02:44 +0100

56 lines

Re: NI Numbers Licence

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:38:05 +0100

42 lines

Re: NI Numbers Licence

Dinsdale, Peter <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:51:12 +0100

97 lines

NI Numbers Licence

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 14:29:46 +0100

126 lines

Re: NI Numbers Licence

Nic Drew (Cardiff and Vale UHB - IT Security) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 14:44:37 +0100

142 lines

Re: NI Numbers Licence

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 21:17:44 +0100

40 lines

Re: NI Numbers Licence

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Sep 2010 12:09:17 +0100

31 lines

Re: NI Numbers Licence[Scanned]

Ronan Durnin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 15:13:09 +0100

176 lines

Re: NI Numbers Licence[Scanned]

Ronan Durnin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 16:06:49 +0100

176 lines

NPM - RE: [data-protection] PROTECT

Dodgson, Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:39:00 +0100

747 lines

Online Privacy

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 07:20:51 +0100

35 lines

Oral Histories

Dominey, Caroline <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 08:34:12 +0100

177 lines

Re: Oral Histories

Simon Rogerson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:24:44 +0100

81 lines

Re: Oral Histories

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:58:56 +0100

134 lines

Re: Oral Histories

Dominey, Caroline <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 13:13:51 +0100

221 lines

Part-seconded staff

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Sep 2010 12:31:06 +0100

216 lines

Re: Part-seconded staff

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Sep 2010 12:53:17 +0100

412 lines

Re: Part-seconded staff

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Sep 2010 13:38:59 +0100

331 lines

Re: Part-seconded staff

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Sep 2010 14:06:43 +0100

714 lines

Password Re Use

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 14:25:50 +0100

39 lines

Police legal advice says there is more RIPA protection for unread spam than your confidential archive

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:16:02 +0100

264 lines

Poole Council Decision

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Sep 2010 09:10:35 +0100

48 lines

Privacy Cartoon

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:36:17 +0100

33 lines

PROTECT

Henley, Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:11:44 +0100

260 lines

Public Sector Pay Again

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:11:20 +0100

44 lines

Re: Public Sector Pay Again

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Sep 2010 13:49:34 +0100

44 lines

Question and "Hawktalk: Custodial offence for deliberate invasion of data protection? Forget it!"

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Sep 2010 14:35:58 +0100

317 lines

Records and information management myths and legends: free London event

E Lomas <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 10:45:26 +0100

67 lines

Request for information regarding a senior member of staff

Henley, Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:24:49 +0100

286 lines

Re: Request for information regarding a senior member of staff

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:04:43 +0100

547 lines

Re: Request for information regarding a senior member of staff[Scanned]

Ronan Durnin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:44:26 +0100

579 lines

Re: Request for information regarding a senior member of staff[Scanned]

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:33:38 +0100

876 lines

Re: Request for information regarding a senior member of staff[Scanned]

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:09:02 +0100

727 lines

Re: Request for information regarding a senior member of staff[Scanned]

Ronan Durnin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:27:23 +0100

668 lines

Re: Request for information regarding a senior member of staff[Scanned]

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Sep 2010 21:28:57 +0100

443 lines

S29 Police Request

Matt Cooper <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:36:15 +0100

71 lines

Re: S29 Police Request

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Sep 2010 20:21:47 +0100

109 lines

Re: S29 Police Request

Andrew Cormack <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Sep 2010 07:08:08 +0000

124 lines

self-employed staff and access to personal data

Stock, Sara <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Sep 2010 16:12:40 +0100

269 lines

Re: self-employed staff and access to personal data

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Sep 2010 16:37:51 +0100

341 lines

Re: self-employed staff and access to personal data

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Sep 2010 17:02:52 +0100

369 lines

Re: self-employed staff and access to personal data

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:31:54 +0100

107 lines

Re: self-employed staff and access to personal data[Scanned]

Ronan Durnin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Sep 2010 17:08:17 +0100

573 lines

Re: self-employed staff and access to personal data[Scanned]

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Sep 2010 17:33:33 +0100

575 lines

Re: self-employed staff and access to personal data[Scanned]

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Sep 2010 12:55:08 -0400

253 lines

Re: self-employed staff and access to personal data[Scanned]

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Sep 2010 18:17:10 +0100

171 lines

Re: self-employed staff and access to personal data[Scanned]

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Sep 2010 20:08:29 +0100

53 lines

Re: self-employed staff and access to personal data[Scanned]

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Sep 2010 21:33:24 +0100

145 lines

Re: self-employed staff and access to personal data[Scanned]

Stock, Sara <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Sep 2010 08:19:33 +0100

262 lines

Sensitive data

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:51:31 +0100

40 lines

Re: Sensitive data

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:50:07 +0100

115 lines

Twitter

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:11:20 +0100

44 lines

Vetting and Barring Scheme

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:37:18 +0100

46 lines

Webcasts and CPD

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:25:02 +0100

34 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager