JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for TB-SUPPORT Archives


TB-SUPPORT Archives

TB-SUPPORT Archives


September 2010


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

ATLAS Monitoring for Squids (21 messages)
Choosing a close SE (3 messages)
Deployment team & sites meeting @ 11am (3 messages)
GDB Report 8/9/10 (4 messages)
Getting Tier2 BDII configs consistent (17 messages)
lcgbdii.gridpp.rl.ac.uk flapping for Glasgow (2 messages)
Manchester top-level BDII "less than full"? (4 messages)
Monitoring for ATLAS Squids (3 messages)
My cream-ce (ceprod05.grid.hep.ph.ic.ac.uk) didn't survive the security patch (5 messages)
New version of fetch-crl (1 message)
Site BDII trouble: site information won't bind to site name. (12 messages)
Top-level BDII problems == anyone else seeing "empty" top-level BDIIs? (11 messages)
VOMS Questions (3 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TB-SUPPORT Home

TB-SUPPORT Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

ATLAS Monitoring for Squids

ATLAS Monitoring for Squids

Alastair Dewhurst <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Sep 2010 12:26:46 +0100

72 lines

Re: ATLAS Monitoring for Squids

Mike Kenyon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Sep 2010 12:36:54 +0100

91 lines

Re: ATLAS Monitoring for Squids

Ewan MacMahon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Sep 2010 13:32:11 +0100

24 lines

Re: ATLAS Monitoring for Squids

Alessandra Forti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Sep 2010 22:18:56 +0100

26 lines

Re: ATLAS Monitoring for Squids

Simon George <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:34:25 +0100

30 lines

Re: ATLAS Monitoring for Squids

Alessandra Forti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 14:45:29 +0100

41 lines

Re: ATLAS Monitoring for Squids

Ewan MacMahon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 14:53:49 +0100

30 lines

Re: ATLAS Monitoring for Squids

Mike Kenyon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 15:00:47 +0100

49 lines

Re: ATLAS Monitoring for Squids

Alessandra Forti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 15:22:47 +0100

60 lines

Re: ATLAS Monitoring for Squids

Mike Kenyon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 15:30:06 +0100

80 lines

Re: ATLAS Monitoring for Squids

Alessandra Forti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 15:44:52 +0100

84 lines

Re: ATLAS Monitoring for Squids

Mike Kenyon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 16:04:03 +0100

122 lines

Re: ATLAS Monitoring for Squids

Alessandra Forti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 16:22:19 +0100

27 lines

Re: ATLAS Monitoring for Squids

Chris Curtis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 17:41:46 +0100

45 lines

Re: ATLAS Monitoring for Squids

Chris Curtis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 18:59:27 +0100

56 lines

Re: ATLAS Monitoring for Squids

Alessandra Forti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 20:36:14 +0100

45 lines

Re: ATLAS Monitoring for Squids

Alessandra Forti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 20:56:24 +0100

52 lines

Re: ATLAS Monitoring for Squids

Alessandra Forti <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Sep 2010 08:20:40 +0100

59 lines

Re: ATLAS Monitoring for Squids

Ben Waugh <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 11:45:13 +0100

77 lines

Re: ATLAS Monitoring for Squids

Alessandra Forti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 11:54:32 +0100

80 lines

Re: ATLAS Monitoring for Squids

Alessandra Forti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Sep 2010 11:54:30 +0100

93 lines

New Thread

Choosing a close SE

Choosing a close SE

Christopher J.Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:24:05 +0100

17 lines

Re: Choosing a close SE

John Gordon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:29:01 +0100

28 lines

Re: Choosing a close SE

Stephen Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:40:03 +0100

25 lines

New Thread

Deployment team & sites meeting @ 11am

Deployment team & sites meeting @ 11am

J Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 22:51:16 +0100

28 lines

Re: Deployment team & sites meeting @ 11am

Kashif Mohammad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 11:29:21 +0000

38 lines

Deployment team & sites meeting @ 11am

J Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:21:08 +0100

44 lines

New Thread

GDB Report 8/9/10

GDB Report 8/9/10

Alessandra Forti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Sep 2010 13:35:43 +0100

502 lines

Re: GDB Report 8/9/10

Stephen Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Sep 2010 14:27:03 +0100

22 lines

Re: GDB Report 8/9/10

John Gordon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Sep 2010 15:42:29 +0100

41 lines

Re: GDB Report 8/9/10

John Gordon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Sep 2010 15:51:12 +0100

470 lines

New Thread

Getting Tier2 BDII configs consistent

Getting Tier2 BDII configs consistent

Hellier, Richard (STFC,RAL,ESC) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:53:02 +0100

357 lines

Re: Getting Tier2 BDII configs consistent

Sam Skipsey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:06:13 +0100

109 lines

Re: Getting Tier2 BDII configs consistent

Hellier, Richard (STFC,RAL,ESC) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:24:18 +0100

208 lines

Re: Getting Tier2 BDII configs consistent

J Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:42:17 +0100

143 lines

Re: Getting Tier2 BDII configs consistent

Peter Gronbech <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:48:22 +0000

171 lines

Re: Getting Tier2 BDII configs consistent

Derek Ross <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:50:53 +0100

209 lines

Re: Getting Tier2 BDII configs consistent

Alessandra Forti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:56:26 +0100

158 lines

Re: Getting Tier2 BDII configs consistent

J Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:11:18 +0100

183 lines

Re: Getting Tier2 BDII configs consistent

John Gordon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:40:26 +0100

188 lines

Re: Getting Tier2 BDII configs consistent

John Gordon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:50:57 +0100

180 lines

Re: Getting Tier2 BDII configs consistent

Alessandra Forti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:14:01 +0100

195 lines

Re: Getting Tier2 BDII configs consistent

John Gordon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:32:31 +0100

218 lines

Re: Getting Tier2 BDII configs consistent

Alessandra Forti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:33:56 +0100

219 lines

Re: Getting Tier2 BDII configs consistent

J Coles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:39:17 +0100

237 lines

Re: Getting Tier2 BDII configs consistent

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:41:41 +0100

264 lines

Re: Getting Tier2 BDII configs consistent

Alessandra Forti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:53:31 +0100

262 lines

Re: Getting Tier2 BDII configs consistent

Stephen Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 08:45:44 +0100

25 lines

New Thread

lcgbdii.gridpp.rl.ac.uk flapping for Glasgow

lcgbdii.gridpp.rl.ac.uk flapping for Glasgow

Stuart Purdie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 14:47:29 +0100

106 lines

Re: lcgbdii.gridpp.rl.ac.uk flapping for Glasgow

Hellier, Richard (STFC,RAL,ESC) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 14:55:09 +0100

138 lines

New Thread

Manchester top-level BDII "less than full"?

Manchester top-level BDII "less than full"?

Hellier, Richard (STFC,RAL,ESC) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Sep 2010 09:23:36 +0100

236 lines

Re: Manchester top-level BDII "less than full"?

Alessandra Forti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Sep 2010 09:32:50 +0100

148 lines

Re: Manchester top-level BDII "less than full"?

Stephen Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Sep 2010 10:21:21 +0100

24 lines

Re: Manchester top-level BDII "less than full"?

Alessandra Forti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Sep 2010 10:42:07 +0100

18 lines

New Thread

Monitoring for ATLAS Squids

Monitoring for ATLAS Squids

Alastair Dewhurst <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 16:00:51 +0100

45 lines

Re: Monitoring for ATLAS Squids

Stephen Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 17:32:50 +0100

21 lines

Re: Monitoring for ATLAS Squids

Santanu Das <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:31:35 +0100

54 lines

New Thread

My cream-ce (ceprod05.grid.hep.ph.ic.ac.uk) didn't survive the security patch

My cream-ce (ceprod05.grid.hep.ph.ic.ac.uk) didn't survive the security patch

Daniela Bauer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 12:52:03 +0100

41 lines

Re: My cream-ce (ceprod05.grid.hep.ph.ic.ac.uk) didn't survive the security patch

Stephen Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 13:05:52 +0100

25 lines

Re: My cream-ce (ceprod05.grid.hep.ph.ic.ac.uk) didn't survive the security patch

Daniela Bauer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 13:12:57 +0100

42 lines

Re: My cream-ce (ceprod05.grid.hep.ph.ic.ac.uk) didn't survive the security patch

Stephen Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 14:28:22 +0100

24 lines

Re: My cream-ce (ceprod05.grid.hep.ph.ic.ac.uk) didn't survive the security patch

RAUL H C LOPES <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 14:30:48 +0100

45 lines

New Thread

New version of fetch-crl

New version of fetch-crl

Jensen, J (Jens) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 15:18:18 +0100

25 lines

New Thread

Site BDII trouble: site information won't bind to site name.

Site BDII trouble: site information won't bind to site name.

Matt Doidge <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Sep 2010 17:47:19 +0100

63 lines

Re: Site BDII trouble: site information won't bind to site name.

Stephen Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Sep 2010 19:12:53 +0100

41 lines

Re: Site BDII trouble: site information won't bind to site name.

Stephen Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Sep 2010 19:43:12 +0100

23 lines

Re: Site BDII trouble: site information won't bind to site name.

Matt Doidge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Sep 2010 10:57:29 +0100

40 lines

Re: Site BDII trouble: site information won't bind to site name.

Ewan MacMahon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Sep 2010 11:09:50 +0100

28 lines

Re: Site BDII trouble: site information won't bind to site name.

Matt Doidge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Sep 2010 11:21:58 +0100

41 lines

Re: Site BDII trouble: site information won't bind to site name.

Ewan MacMahon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Sep 2010 11:49:27 +0100

66 lines

Re: Site BDII trouble: site information won't bind to site name.

Stephen Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Sep 2010 12:24:10 +0100

22 lines

Re: Site BDII trouble: site information won't bind to site name.

Matt Doidge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Sep 2010 14:41:10 +0100

56 lines

Re: Site BDII trouble: site information won't bind to site name.

Stephen Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Sep 2010 14:51:40 +0100

26 lines

Re: Site BDII trouble: site information won't bind to site name.

Matt Doidge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Sep 2010 15:29:41 +0100

36 lines

Re: Site BDII trouble: site information won't bind to site name.

Matt Doidge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 11:21:29 +0100

53 lines

New Thread

Top-level BDII problems == anyone else seeing "empty" top-level BDIIs?

Top-level BDII problems == anyone else seeing "empty" top-level BDIIs?

Hellier, Richard (STFC,RAL,ESC) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 09:36:36 +0100

29 lines

Re: Top-level BDII problems == anyone else seeing "empty" top-level BDIIs?

Wahid Bhimji <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 09:55:21 +0100

59 lines

Re: Top-level BDII problems == anyone else seeing "empty" top-level BDIIs?

Kashif Mohammad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 10:03:39 +0100

34 lines

Re: Top-level BDII problems == anyone else seeing "empty" top-level BDIIs?

Stuart Purdie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 11:05:13 +0100

113 lines

Re: Top-level BDII problems == anyone else seeing "empty" top-level BDIIs?

Elena Korolkova <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 13:17:11 +0100

94 lines

Re: Top-level BDII problems == anyone else seeing "empty" top-level BDIIs?

Chris Curtis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 13:20:37 +0100

67 lines

Re: Top-level BDII problems == anyone else seeing "empty" top-level BDIIs?

Stephen Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 13:24:47 +0100

26 lines

Re: Top-level BDII problems == anyone else seeing "empty" top-level BDIIs?

Daniela Bauer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 13:25:18 +0100

115 lines

Re: Top-level BDII problems == anyone else seeing "empty" top-level BDIIs?

Elena Korolkova <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 13:46:41 +0100

146 lines

Re: Top-level BDII problems == anyone else seeing "empty" top-level BDIIs?

Daniela Bauer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 13:56:55 +0100

109 lines

Re: Top-level BDII problems == anyone else seeing "empty" top-level BDIIs?

Steve Lloyd <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 16:50:49 +0100

132 lines

New Thread

VOMS Questions

VOMS Questions

Ben Still <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Sep 2010 15:30:46 +0100

402 lines

Re: VOMS Questions

Sergey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Sep 2010 16:04:55 +0100

144 lines

Re: VOMS Questions

Ben Still <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Sep 2010 12:10:28 +0100

245 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager