|
|
|
Size
|
Re: Currently preferred email client
|
Paul Bromley |
Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:44:11 +0100 |
213 lines |
Re: Currently preferred email client
|
Jel Coward |
Tue, 31 Aug 2010 08:48:53 -0700 |
90 lines |
Re: Currently preferred email client
|
John Clegg |
Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:20:06 +0100 |
166 lines |
Re: Currently preferred email client
|
Paul Bromley |
Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:08:03 +0100 |
131 lines |
Re: Sloooow broadband.
|
dr brian crowley |
Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:05:20 +0100 |
38 lines |
Re: Currently preferred email client
|
John Clegg |
Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:58:18 +0100 |
84 lines |
Re: Currently preferred email client
|
Paul Bromley |
Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:09:41 +0100 |
63 lines |
Re: Sloooow broadband.
|
Michael Leuty |
Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:38:09 +0100 |
85 lines |
Re: Sloooow broadband.
|
Paul Bromley |
Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:31:11 +0100 |
124 lines |
Re: Sloooow broadband.
|
Adrian Midgley (Gmail) |
Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:24:13 +0100 |
19 lines |
Re: Sloooow broadband.
|
Karen |
Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:14:31 +0100 |
23 lines |
Re: Sloooow broadband.
|
Paul Miller |
Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:13:34 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: Sloooow broadband.
|
John Clegg |
Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:22:20 +0100 |
133 lines |
Re: TUPE and redundancy
|
John Glasspool |
Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:18:50 +0100 |
38 lines |
Re: TUPE and redundancy
|
Saul Galloway |
Mon, 30 Aug 2010 09:57:13 +0100 |
19 lines |
Re: TUPE and redundancy
|
John Glasspool |
Mon, 30 Aug 2010 09:43:21 +0100 |
65 lines |
Re: Sloooow broadband.
|
Adrian Midgley (Gmail) |
Mon, 30 Aug 2010 09:29:56 +0100 |
22 lines |
Re: Sloooow broadband.
|
Geoff Schrecker |
Mon, 30 Aug 2010 08:37:14 +0100 |
67 lines |
Re: Sloooow broadband.
|
John Glasspool |
Mon, 30 Aug 2010 08:16:23 +0100 |
48 lines |
Re: Sloooow broadband.
|
John Clegg |
Mon, 30 Aug 2010 07:00:16 +0100 |
63 lines |
Re: TUPE and redundancy
|
Adrian Midgley (Gmail) |
Sun, 29 Aug 2010 20:57:29 +0100 |
38 lines |
Re: Sloooow broadband.
|
Karen |
Sun, 29 Aug 2010 20:44:00 +0100 |
25 lines |
TUPE and redundancy
|
Mary Hawking |
Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:24:50 +0100 |
191 lines |
Sloooow broadband.
|
John Glasspool |
Sun, 29 Aug 2010 17:21:59 +0100 |
36 lines |
Re: Currently preferred email client
|
Stephen Meech |
Sat, 28 Aug 2010 09:26:34 +0100 |
43 lines |
Re: Currently preferred email client
|
mark westwood |
Fri, 27 Aug 2010 21:38:05 +0100 |
79 lines |
Re: Currently preferred email client
|
mark westwood |
Fri, 27 Aug 2010 21:38:05 +0100 |
46 lines |
Re: Currently preferred email client
|
Jel Coward |
Fri, 27 Aug 2010 11:54:48 -0700 |
38 lines |
Re: Currently preferred email client
|
Geoff Schrecker |
Fri, 27 Aug 2010 19:25:57 +0100 |
24 lines |
Re: Currently preferred email client
|
Jel Coward |
Fri, 27 Aug 2010 11:03:03 -0700 |
169 lines |
Re: Currently preferred email client
|
mark westwood |
Fri, 27 Aug 2010 08:34:12 +0100 |
76 lines |
Re: Currently preferred email client
|
Adrian Midgley (Gmail) |
Thu, 26 Aug 2010 23:01:18 +0100 |
18 lines |
Re: Currently preferred email client
|
Graham Balin |
Fri, 27 Aug 2010 06:38:35 +1000 |
57 lines |
Re: Currently preferred email client
|
Declan Fox |
Thu, 26 Aug 2010 21:28:57 +0100 |
14 lines |
Re: Currently preferred email client
|
Stephen Meech |
Thu, 26 Aug 2010 18:17:11 +0100 |
51 lines |
Re: Currently preferred email client
|
mark westwood |
Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:25:34 +0100 |
116 lines |
Re: Currently preferred email client
|
John Clegg |
Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:21:10 +0100 |
37 lines |
Re: Currently preferred email client
|
Geoff Schrecker |
Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:44:23 +0100 |
28 lines |
Currently preferred email client
|
Julian Bradley |
Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:32:21 +0100 |
14 lines |
Re: in 1997 the profession and craft failed to seize opportunities
|
John Glasspool |
Tue, 24 Aug 2010 21:15:14 +0100 |
214 lines |
Re: in 1997 the profession and craft failed to seize opportunities
|
Paul Caldwell |
Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:44:37 +0000 |
331 lines |
Re: in 1997 the profession and craft failed to seize opportunities
|
MICHAEL D'SOUZA |
Tue, 24 Aug 2010 00:49:51 +0100 |
167 lines |
Re: in 1997 the profession and craft failed to seize opportunities
|
Saul Galloway |
Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:20:23 +0100 |
15 lines |
Re: in 1997 the profession and craft failed to seize opportunities
|
Adrian Midgley (Gmail) |
Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:07:20 +0100 |
54 lines |
Re: in 1997 the profession and craft failed to seize opportunities
|
Jeff Green |
Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:23:36 +0100 |
147 lines |
Re: US FP EMR incentive program(me)s
|
Rob Wilson |
Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:11:42 +0100 |
23 lines |
Re: in 1997 the profession and craft failed to seize opportunities
|
Paul Caldwell |
Mon, 23 Aug 2010 11:37:21 +0000 |
264 lines |
Re: in 1997 the profession and craft failed to seize opportunities
|
Saul Galloway |
Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:31:17 +0100 |
114 lines |
Re: in 1997 the profession and craft failed to seize opportunities
|
Paul Caldwell |
Mon, 23 Aug 2010 09:07:38 +0000 |
188 lines |
Re: in 1997 the profession and craft failed to seize opportunities
|
MICHAEL D'SOUZA |
Sun, 22 Aug 2010 23:03:40 +0100 |
84 lines |
Re: in 1997 the profession and craft failed to seize opportunities
|
Michael Leuty |
Sun, 22 Aug 2010 21:36:17 +0100 |
21 lines |
US FP EMR incentive program(me)s
|
Adrian Midgley (Gmail) |
Sun, 22 Aug 2010 19:55:59 +0100 |
19 lines |
Re: in 1997 the profession and craft failed to seize opportunities
|
Adrian Midgley (Gmail) |
Sun, 22 Aug 2010 19:38:10 +0100 |
26 lines |
Re: Anyone have a contact who can give a pointer about NHS Scotland's XML messaging referrals and discharge projects
|
Adrian Midgley (Gmail) |
Sun, 22 Aug 2010 18:39:09 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: Anyone considering stopping using Ezitimibe?
|
Saul Galloway |
Sun, 22 Aug 2010 17:00:37 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: Anyone considering stopping using Ezitimibe?
|
Adrian Midgley (Gmail) |
Sun, 22 Aug 2010 16:42:55 +0100 |
33 lines |
Re: Anyone considering stopping using Ezitimibe?
|
Paul Caldwell |
Sun, 22 Aug 2010 15:22:12 +0000 |
152 lines |
Re: Anyone considering stopping using Ezitimibe?
|
Roger Gardiner |
Sun, 22 Aug 2010 07:47:15 -0400 |
162 lines |
Anyone considering stopping using Ezitimibe?
|
Saul Galloway |
Sun, 22 Aug 2010 11:40:14 +0100 |
18 lines |
HDL, LDL and Total Cholesterol change during the menstraul cycle: how significant is this?
|
Mary Hawking |
Sun, 22 Aug 2010 11:18:13 +0100 |
167 lines |
Re: in 1997 the profession and craft failed to seize opportunities
|
Mary Hawking |
Sat, 21 Aug 2010 19:26:53 +0100 |
96 lines |
in 1997 the profession and craft failed to seize opportunities
|
Adrian Midgley (Gmail) |
Sat, 21 Aug 2010 14:40:55 +0100 |
51 lines |
Re: opioids for migraine via A+E (or GP)
|
Paul Miller |
Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:19:19 +0100 |
68 lines |
Re: another question for the esteemed panel
|
Emile de Sousa |
Wed, 18 Aug 2010 23:02:41 +0100 |
33 lines |
Re: another question for the esteemed panel
|
Adrian Midgley (Gmail) |
Wed, 18 Aug 2010 22:10:23 +0100 |
21 lines |
Re: another question for the esteemed panel
|
Emile de Sousa |
Wed, 18 Aug 2010 21:31:57 +0100 |
285 lines |
Re: another question for the esteemed panel
|
Paul Caldwell |
Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:42:42 +0000 |
106 lines |
another question for the esteemed panel
|
Jel Coward |
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 22:46:51 -0700 |
38 lines |
Cyberounds: Who's Fibbing Now?
|
Harry Levy |
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 08:09:49 -0400 |
134 lines |
2011 Forum - Call for Abstracts open
|
Doug Corrigall |
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:54:05 +0100 |
46 lines |
Re: opioids for migraine via A+E (or GP)
|
John Glasspool |
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 08:22:52 +0100 |
48 lines |
FYI: BBC2 Hardtalk | Stephen Sackur talks to Dr Hamish Meldrum, Chairman of the BMA.
|
Chris Salter |
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 00:38:44 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: Significant Event reporting
|
Adrian Midgley (Gmail) |
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:27:27 +0100 |
42 lines |
Re: Significant Event reporting
|
Adrian Midgley (Gmail) |
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:22:53 +0100 |
20 lines |
Re: Significant Event reporting
|
Julian Bradley |
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 20:31:46 +0100 |
44 lines |
Re: opioids for migraine via A+E (or GP)
|
Julian Bradley |
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 20:25:01 +0100 |
24 lines |
Re: opioids for migraine via A+E (or GP)
|
Saul Galloway |
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:38:08 +0100 |
27 lines |
Re: Significant Event reporting
|
Roger Gardiner |
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:32:28 +0100 |
297 lines |
Re: Significant Event reporting
|
Saul Galloway |
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:27:34 +0100 |
56 lines |
Re: Significant Event reporting
|
Dr Roger Gardiner |
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:25:48 +0100 |
70 lines |
opioids for migraine via A+E (or GP)
|
Jel Coward |
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:24:30 -0700 |
53 lines |
Re: Significant Event reporting
|
Dr Roger Gardiner |
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:23:41 +0100 |
87 lines |
Re: Significant Event reporting
|
Mary Hawking |
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:18:04 +0100 |
61 lines |
Re: Significant Event reporting
|
Russell Brown |
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:16:34 +0100 |
73 lines |
Re: Significant Event reporting
|
Dr Roger Gardiner |
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:09:47 +0100 |
49 lines |
Re: Significant Event reporting
|
Russell Brown |
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 18:56:46 +0100 |
37 lines |
Re: Significant Event reporting
|
Dr Roger Gardiner |
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 18:47:49 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: Significant Event reporting
|
Michael Leuty |
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 18:02:03 +0100 |
21 lines |
Re: Significant Event reporting
|
Paul Caldwell |
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:34:37 +0000 |
132 lines |
Re: Significant Event reporting
|
Mary Hawking |
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 13:51:37 +0100 |
54 lines |
Re: Significant Event reporting
|
Julian Bradley |
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 13:41:51 +0100 |
30 lines |
Re: Significant Event reporting
|
John Glasspool |
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 12:28:55 +0100 |
33 lines |
Significant Event reporting
|
Paul Caldwell |
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:19:12 +0000 |
55 lines |
Re: Eosinophilic oesophagitis
|
Graham Balin |
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 20:30:16 +1000 |
74 lines |
Re: Eosinophilic oesophagitis
|
Andy Lee |
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 06:43:27 +0000 |
111 lines |
Re: Eosinophilic oesophagitis
|
John Glasspool |
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 07:12:03 +0100 |
32 lines |
Eosinophilic oesophagitis
|
Julian Bradley |
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 00:40:00 +0100 |
13 lines |
Re: Englands population and list size
|
Jeff Green |
Sun, 15 Aug 2010 09:17:16 +0100 |
17 lines |
Re: Englands population and list size
|
Mary Hawking |
Sat, 14 Aug 2010 19:09:48 +0100 |
42 lines |
Re: Englands population and list size
|
Adrian Midgley (Gmail) |
Sat, 14 Aug 2010 18:04:53 +0100 |
29 lines |
Re: evidence needed that a significant number of patients have not received letters about SCR
|
David Royal |
Sat, 14 Aug 2010 09:26:53 +0100 |
188 lines |
Englands population and list size
|
Jeff Green |
Sat, 14 Aug 2010 02:24:15 +0100 |
21 lines |
Re: evidence needed that a significant number of patients have not received letters about SCR
|
John Glasspool |
Fri, 13 Aug 2010 21:39:09 +0100 |
69 lines |
evidence needed that a significant number of patients have not received letters about SCR
|
Mary Hawking |
Fri, 13 Aug 2010 21:06:22 +0100 |
181 lines |
Re: HL7 uk
|
Rik Smithies |
Fri, 13 Aug 2010 10:15:44 +0100 |
33 lines |
Re: Anyone have a contact who can give a pointer about NHS Scotland's XML messaging referrals and discharge projects
|
Ian McNicoll |
Thu, 12 Aug 2010 18:12:31 +0100 |
270 lines |
Re: Anyone have a contact who can give a pointer about NHS Scotland's XML messaging referrals and discharge projects
|
Paul Miller |
Thu, 12 Aug 2010 09:02:52 +0100 |
38 lines |
Re: Anyone have a contact who can give a pointer about NHS Scotland's XML messaging referrals and discharge projects
|
Adrian Midgley (Gmail) |
Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:20:52 +0100 |
37 lines |
Anyone have a contact who can give a pointer about NHS Scotland's XML messaging referrals and discharge projects
|
Saul Galloway |
Wed, 11 Aug 2010 12:38:36 +0100 |
20 lines |
HL7 uk
|
Saul Galloway |
Mon, 9 Aug 2010 17:30:07 +0100 |
19 lines |
NHS GP to hospital referrals - messaging standards
|
Saul Galloway |
Mon, 9 Aug 2010 14:49:10 +0100 |
12 lines |
BCS PHCSG 30th Annual Conference 11-13 October 2010
|
Robert Treharne Jones |
Sun, 8 Aug 2010 19:44:24 +0100 |
101 lines |
Re: What would you commission?
|
Lesley kay |
Sat, 7 Aug 2010 09:34:29 +0100 |
26 lines |
topiramate query
|
Saul Galloway |
Sat, 7 Aug 2010 07:43:37 +0100 |
11 lines |
Re: What would you commission?
|
Jeff Green |
Fri, 6 Aug 2010 10:12:53 +0100 |
18 lines |
Re: What would you commission?
|
Lesley kay |
Fri, 6 Aug 2010 07:05:56 +0100 |
44 lines |
Re: What would you commission?
|
Jeff Green |
Thu, 5 Aug 2010 23:57:58 +0100 |
25 lines |
Re: What would you commission?
|
Julian Bradley |
Thu, 5 Aug 2010 23:32:05 +0100 |
50 lines |
Re: What would you commission?
|
Jeff Green |
Thu, 5 Aug 2010 23:12:02 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: IT in new climate
|
Jel Coward |
Thu, 5 Aug 2010 11:39:30 -0700 |
87 lines |
Re: IT in new climate
|
Adrian Midgley (Gmail) |
Thu, 5 Aug 2010 18:53:00 +0100 |
20 lines |
Re: IT in new climate
|
John Clegg |
Thu, 5 Aug 2010 14:46:09 +0100 |
135 lines |
Re: IT in new climate
|
Markwick Christopher (Medway PCT) |
Thu, 5 Aug 2010 14:38:04 +0100 |
60 lines |
Re: IT in new climate
|
Russell Brown |
Thu, 5 Aug 2010 14:33:29 +0100 |
69 lines |
Re: IT in new climate
|
Adrian Midgley |
Thu, 5 Aug 2010 14:30:17 +0100 |
26 lines |
Re: IT in new climate
|
John Clegg |
Thu, 5 Aug 2010 14:23:52 +0100 |
32 lines |
Re: IT in new climate
|
Russell Brown |
Thu, 5 Aug 2010 14:11:46 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: IT in new climate
|
Adrian Midgley (Gmail) |
Thu, 5 Aug 2010 14:05:01 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: IT in new climate
|
Mary Hawking |
Thu, 5 Aug 2010 13:55:15 +0100 |
25 lines |
Re: IT in new climate
|
Adrian Midgley (Gmail) |
Thu, 5 Aug 2010 13:20:33 +0100 |
36 lines |
Re: IT in new climate
|
Mary Hawking |
Thu, 5 Aug 2010 13:16:01 +0100 |
133 lines |
Re: IT in new climate
|
Adrian Midgley |
Thu, 5 Aug 2010 12:03:32 +0100 |
22 lines |
Re: IT in new climate
|
Adrian Midgley |
Thu, 5 Aug 2010 12:02:22 +0100 |
37 lines |
Re: What would you commission?
|
Graham Balin |
Thu, 5 Aug 2010 20:38:22 +1000 |
36 lines |
IT in new climate
|
Markwick Christopher (Medway PCT) |
Thu, 5 Aug 2010 11:20:28 +0100 |
57 lines |
Re: What would you commission?
|
Julian Bradley |
Thu, 5 Aug 2010 11:17:57 +0100 |
42 lines |
Re: What would you commission?
|
John Glasspool |
Thu, 5 Aug 2010 09:21:53 +0100 |
98 lines |
Re: What would you commission?
|
Graham Balin |
Thu, 5 Aug 2010 17:17:03 +1000 |
64 lines |
Re: What would you commission?
|
John Glasspool |
Wed, 4 Aug 2010 10:38:32 +0100 |
61 lines |
Re: What would you commission?
|
Julian Bradley |
Wed, 4 Aug 2010 10:18:18 +0100 |
21 lines |
Re: What would you commission?
|
Julian Bradley |
Wed, 4 Aug 2010 10:15:09 +0100 |
29 lines |
Re: What would you commission?
|
Roger Gardiner |
Wed, 4 Aug 2010 04:43:20 -0400 |
237 lines |
Re: What would you commission?
|
John Glasspool |
Wed, 4 Aug 2010 09:32:42 +0100 |
62 lines |
Re: What would you commission?
|
Gavin Jamie |
Wed, 4 Aug 2010 08:49:12 +0100 |
45 lines |
Re: What would you commission?
|
John Glasspool |
Wed, 4 Aug 2010 08:43:59 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: What would you commission?
|
Julian Bradley |
Tue, 3 Aug 2010 23:07:50 +0100 |
22 lines |
Re: What would you commission?
|
Adrian Midgley (Gmail) |
Tue, 3 Aug 2010 20:39:56 +0100 |
27 lines |
Re: What would you commission?
|
Adrian Midgley (Gmail) |
Tue, 3 Aug 2010 20:36:26 +0100 |
14 lines |
Re: What would you commission?
|
Adrian Midgley (Gmail) |
Tue, 3 Aug 2010 20:33:31 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: What would you commission?
|
Julian Bradley |
Tue, 3 Aug 2010 20:15:37 +0100 |
70 lines |
Re: What would you commission?
|
Emile de Sousa |
Tue, 3 Aug 2010 19:02:31 +0100 |
75 lines |
Re: What would you commission?
|
Saul Galloway |
Tue, 3 Aug 2010 18:24:10 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: What would you commission?
|
Markwick Christopher (Medway PCT) |
Tue, 3 Aug 2010 17:06:50 +0100 |
140 lines |
Re: What would you commission?
|
John Glasspool |
Tue, 3 Aug 2010 16:16:39 +0100 |
93 lines |
What would you commission?
|
Markwick Christopher (Medway PCT) |
Tue, 3 Aug 2010 15:01:47 +0100 |
186 lines |
Re: Practice web sites
|
John Glasspool |
Tue, 3 Aug 2010 08:29:43 +0100 |
69 lines |
Re: Practice web sites
|
Markwick Christopher (Medway PCT) |
Mon, 2 Aug 2010 21:05:00 +0100 |
65 lines |
Re: Practice web sites
|
Jel Coward |
Mon, 2 Aug 2010 12:51:32 -0700 |
160 lines |
Re: Practice web sites
|
Adrian Midgley (Gmail) |
Mon, 2 Aug 2010 20:46:57 +0100 |
26 lines |
Re: Practice web sites
|
Michael Leuty |
Mon, 2 Aug 2010 18:23:10 +0100 |
21 lines |
Practice web sites
|
dr brian crowley |
Mon, 2 Aug 2010 18:20:18 +0100 |
154 lines |
Evidence 2010 Transforming Healthcare-final week for Early Bird savings
|
Warren Lee |
Mon, 2 Aug 2010 14:33:38 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: Codeine addiction question
|
MICHAEL D'SOUZA |
Mon, 2 Aug 2010 10:25:14 +0100 |
213 lines |
Re: Neither techie nor medical: sparrows
|
John Clegg |
Mon, 2 Aug 2010 10:19:34 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: Neither techie nor medical: sparrows
|
Katie Law |
Mon, 2 Aug 2010 08:10:37 +0100 |
45 lines |
Re: Neither techie nor medical: sparrows
|
John Glasspool |
Mon, 2 Aug 2010 07:13:51 +0100 |
54 lines |
Re: Neither techie nor medical: sparrows
|
Julian Bradley |
Sun, 1 Aug 2010 21:40:25 +0100 |
23 lines |
Re: Neither techie nor medical: sparrows
|
Markwick Christopher (Medway PCT) |
Sun, 1 Aug 2010 21:06:51 +0100 |
78 lines |
Re: Neither techie nor medical: sparrows
|
Dinesh Patel |
Sun, 1 Aug 2010 20:10:26 +0100 |
43 lines |
Neither techie nor medical: sparrows
|
Mary Hawking |
Sun, 1 Aug 2010 19:45:40 +0100 |
32 lines |