|
|
|
Size
|
Announcement: Proposed standard for the structure of grey literature - FISH discussion starting 16th August
|
LEE, Edmund |
Mon, 2 Aug 2010 12:17:20 +0100 |
198 lines |
Historic dates in HTML5
|
Andy Mabbett |
Sat, 7 Aug 2010 09:36:26 +0100 |
52 lines |
Re: Historic dates in HTML5
|
Nick Boldrini |
Wed, 11 Aug 2010 09:45:09 +0100 |
111 lines |
Re: Historic dates in HTML5
|
ADAMS, Paul |
Wed, 11 Aug 2010 09:59:11 +0100 |
144 lines |
Kate Wall/Hertford/ENV/HertsCC is out of the office.
|
Kate Batt |
Wed, 11 Aug 2010 10:06:19 +0100 |
40 lines |
Re: Historic dates in HTML5
|
Tudhope D S (AT) |
Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:14:05 +0000 |
179 lines |
Proposed standard for the structure of grey literature - FISH discussion starting today!
|
TURNER, Emma |
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 10:05:27 +0100 |
171 lines |
Preamble
|
LEE, Edmund |
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 10:20:05 +0100 |
160 lines |
HEGEL discussion - Agenda
|
LEE, Edmund |
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 10:26:22 +0100 |
109 lines |
Political parameters
|
Jenny Hall |
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 09:52:43 +0000 |
38 lines |
Re: Political parameters
|
LEE, Edmund |
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:23:26 +0100 |
132 lines |
HEGEL - background to the project
|
LEE, Edmund |
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:40:05 +0100 |
307 lines |
HEGEL Stakeholders list
|
LEE, Edmund |
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 12:41:26 +0100 |
153 lines |
Re: HEGEL - background to the project
|
Nick Boldrini |
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:40:20 +0100 |
667 lines |
Re: HEGEL - background to the project
|
Isabel Holroyd |
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 15:15:19 +0100 |
885 lines |
Alison Tinniswood/Hertford/ENV/HertsCC is out of the office.
|
Alison Tinniswood |
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:02:45 +0100 |
42 lines |
Re: HEGEL - access to theses
|
CAMPBELL, Gill |
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:35:08 +0100 |
94 lines |
Re: HEGEL - access to theses
|
Isabel Holroyd |
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:58:03 +0100 |
267 lines |
HEGEL - how a standard for grey literature might help.
|
LEE, Edmund |
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:07:22 +0100 |
404 lines |
Re: HEGEL - access and standards
|
csh3 |
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:09:51 +0100 |
788 lines |
Re: HEGEL - access and standards
|
geoff carver |
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:27:19 +0200 |
216 lines |
Re: HEGEL - how a standard for grey literature might help.
|
Martin Locock |
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:46:04 +0100 |
53 lines |
Re: HEGEL - access and standards
|
Gail Falkingham |
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:56:08 +0100 |
350 lines |
Re: HEGEL - access and standards
|
MAY, Keith |
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:03:27 +0100 |
289 lines |
Re: HEGEL - access and standards
|
Nick Boldrini |
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:22:23 +0100 |
782 lines |
Re: HEGEL - how a standard for grey literature might help.
|
Nick Boldrini |
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:25:04 +0100 |
300 lines |
Re: HEGEL - access and standards
|
geoff carver |
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:31:35 +0200 |
196 lines |
Re: HEGEL - how a standard for grey literature might help.
|
LEE, Edmund |
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:52:35 +0100 |
286 lines |
Re: HEGEL - how a standard for grey literature might help.
|
Martin Locock |
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:50:53 +0100 |
44 lines |
Re: HEGEL - how a standard for grey literature might help.
|
Paul Gilman AAG Manager ES |
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:59:20 +0100 |
83 lines |
REMINDER: ISKO UK one-day conference on Linked data - London, 14 September
|
Aida Slavic |
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 14:02:57 +0100 |
76 lines |
HEGEL - an aside on knowledge sharing
|
LEE, Edmund |
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 14:04:44 +0100 |
234 lines |
Re: HEGEL - an aside on knowledge sharing
|
geoff carver |
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:12:10 +0200 |
170 lines |
Re: HEGEL - how a standard for grey literature might help.
|
HUNTLEY, Jacqui |
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 14:41:28 +0100 |
200 lines |
Re: HEGEL - how a standard for grey literature might help.
|
Emily Edwards |
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 14:55:27 +0100 |
172 lines |
HEGEL - survey of existing standards
|
LEE, Edmund |
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:14:03 +0100 |
242 lines |
Re: HEGEL - an aside on knowledge sharing
|
Nick Boldrini |
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:33:14 +0100 |
500 lines |
HEGEL - quality of existing grey literature
|
LEE, Edmund |
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:37:22 +0100 |
240 lines |
Re: HEGEL - access and standards
|
csh3 |
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:48:17 +0100 |
1418 lines |
Re: HEGEL - how a standard for grey literature might help.
|
LEE, Edmund |
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:57:49 +0100 |
119 lines |
Standard for Grey Literature
|
NCampling |
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 22:42:47 +0100 |
243 lines |
Re: Standard for Grey Literature
|
geoff carver |
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 23:51:08 +0200 |
277 lines |
Re: Standard for Grey Literature
|
Jenny Hall |
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 22:05:51 +0000 |
79 lines |
Re: HEGEL - access and standards
|
Tudhope D S (AT) |
Wed, 18 Aug 2010 08:18:27 +0000 |
238 lines |
Re: Standard for Grey Literature
|
LEE, Edmund |
Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:27:54 +0100 |
180 lines |
Re: HEGEL - access and standards
|
geoff carver |
Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:36:42 +0200 |
383 lines |
Re: HEGEL - access and standards
|
Martin Locock |
Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:45:52 +0100 |
51 lines |
HEGEL - approaches to development
|
LEE, Edmund |
Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:46:07 +0100 |
141 lines |
Re: Standard for Grey Literature
|
CAMPBELL, Gill |
Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:57:50 +0100 |
237 lines |
Re: Standard for Grey Literature
|
Nick Boldrini |
Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:09:46 +0100 |
479 lines |
Re: HEGEL - approaches to development
|
REYNOLDS, Trevor |
Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:14:11 +0100 |
269 lines |
Re: HEGEL - approaches to development
|
Nick Boldrini |
Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:14:25 +0100 |
382 lines |
Re: HEGEL - access and standards
|
Crispin Flower |
Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:35:37 +0100 |
107 lines |
Re: HEGEL - access and standards
|
Leif Isaksen |
Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:17:59 +0100 |
145 lines |
Re: HEGEL - access and standards
|
CARLISLE, Philip |
Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:33:37 +0100 |
45 lines |
Re: HEGEL - access and standards
|
CARLISLE, Philip |
Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:42:05 +0100 |
88 lines |
Re: HEGEL - access and standards
|
Leif Isaksen |
Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:46:09 +0100 |
109 lines |
Re: HEGEL - access and standards
|
Nick Boldrini |
Wed, 18 Aug 2010 13:23:04 +0100 |
165 lines |
Re: HEGEL - access and standards
|
Sarah Poppy |
Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:05:03 +0100 |
46 lines |
Re: HEGEL - survey of existing standards
|
Alan Rosevear |
Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:40:42 -0400 |
50 lines |
Re: HEGEL - access and standards
|
Crispin Flower |
Wed, 18 Aug 2010 23:06:29 +0100 |
258 lines |
Re: HEGEL - access and standards
|
Martin Locock |
Thu, 19 Aug 2010 08:18:21 +0100 |
49 lines |
Re: HEGEL - access and standards
|
Simon Walton |
Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:18:13 +0100 |
290 lines |
Re: HEGEL - access and standards
|
geoff carver |
Thu, 19 Aug 2010 10:52:29 +0200 |
30 lines |
HEGEL - what a standard might look like
|
LEE, Edmund |
Thu, 19 Aug 2010 10:34:47 +0100 |
159 lines |
Re: HEGEL - what a standard might look like
|
CAMPBELL, Gill |
Thu, 19 Aug 2010 11:12:45 +0100 |
292 lines |
Re: HEGEL - what a standard might look like
|
Nick Boldrini |
Thu, 19 Aug 2010 11:18:53 +0100 |
555 lines |
Re: HEGEL - what a standard might look like
|
Martin Locock |
Thu, 19 Aug 2010 11:49:37 +0100 |
42 lines |
Re: HEGEL - what a standard might look like
|
LEE, Edmund |
Thu, 19 Aug 2010 11:58:15 +0100 |
303 lines |
HEGEL - what a standard might look like
|
Stuart Jeffrey |
Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:04:48 +0100 |
181 lines |
Re: HEGEL - what a standard might look like
|
Nick Boldrini |
Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:49:54 +0100 |
85 lines |
Re: HEGEL - what a standard might look like
|
MAY, Keith |
Thu, 19 Aug 2010 13:00:44 +0100 |
503 lines |
HEGEL - Further comments
|
LEE, Edmund |
Thu, 19 Aug 2010 13:48:27 +0100 |
78 lines |
Re: HEGEL - what a standard might look like
|
CAMPBELL, Gill |
Fri, 20 Aug 2010 09:59:45 +0100 |
71 lines |
Re: HEGEL - approaches to development
|
LEE, Edmund |
Fri, 20 Aug 2010 10:21:42 +0100 |
242 lines |
HEGEL - comments on thread
|
Jill Hind |
Fri, 20 Aug 2010 10:23:46 +0100 |
64 lines |
HEGEL - First summary
|
LEE, Edmund |
Fri, 20 Aug 2010 13:15:51 +0100 |
189 lines |
HEGEL - thanks and next steps
|
LEE, Edmund |
Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:07:31 +0100 |
113 lines |
Re: HEGEL - thanks and next steps
|
ADAMS, Paul |
Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:17:02 +0100 |
310 lines |
Re: HEGEL - thanks and next steps
|
TURNER, Emma |
Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:21:12 +0100 |
247 lines |