JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for FISH Archives


FISH Archives

FISH Archives


August 2010


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

Alison Tinniswood/Hertford/ENV/HertsCC is out of the office. (1 message)
Announcement: Proposed standard for the structure of grey literature - FISH discussion starting 16th August (1 message)
HEGEL - access and standards (21 messages)
HEGEL - access to theses (2 messages)
HEGEL - an aside on knowledge sharing (3 messages)
HEGEL - approaches to development (4 messages)
HEGEL - background to the project (3 messages)
HEGEL - comments on thread (1 message)
HEGEL - First summary (1 message)
HEGEL - Further comments (1 message)
HEGEL - how a standard for grey literature might help. (9 messages)
HEGEL - quality of existing grey literature (1 message)
HEGEL - survey of existing standards (2 messages)
HEGEL - thanks and next steps (3 messages)
HEGEL - what a standard might look like (9 messages)
HEGEL discussion - Agenda (1 message)
HEGEL Stakeholders list (1 message)
Historic dates in HTML5 (4 messages)
Kate Wall/Hertford/ENV/HertsCC is out of the office. (1 message)
Political parameters (2 messages)
Preamble (1 message)
Proposed standard for the structure of grey literature - FISH discussion starting today! (1 message)
REMINDER: ISKO UK one-day conference on Linked data - London, 14 September (1 message)
Standard for Grey Literature (6 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

FISH Home

FISH Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

Alison Tinniswood/Hertford/ENV/HertsCC is out of the office.

Alison Tinniswood/Hertford/ENV/HertsCC is out of the office.

Alison Tinniswood <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:02:45 +0100

42 lines

New Thread

Announcement: Proposed standard for the structure of grey literature - FISH discussion starting 16th August

Announcement: Proposed standard for the structure of grey literature - FISH discussion starting 16th August

LEE, Edmund <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Aug 2010 12:17:20 +0100

198 lines

New Thread

HEGEL - access and standards

Re: HEGEL - access and standards

csh3 <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:09:51 +0100

788 lines

Re: HEGEL - access and standards

geoff carver <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:27:19 +0200

216 lines

Re: HEGEL - access and standards

Gail Falkingham <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:56:08 +0100

350 lines

Re: HEGEL - access and standards

MAY, Keith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:03:27 +0100

289 lines

Re: HEGEL - access and standards

Nick Boldrini <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:22:23 +0100

782 lines

Re: HEGEL - access and standards

geoff carver <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:31:35 +0200

196 lines

Re: HEGEL - access and standards

csh3 <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:48:17 +0100

1418 lines

Re: HEGEL - access and standards

Tudhope D S (AT) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 08:18:27 +0000

238 lines

Re: HEGEL - access and standards

geoff carver <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:36:42 +0200

383 lines

Re: HEGEL - access and standards

Martin Locock <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:45:52 +0100

51 lines

Re: HEGEL - access and standards

Crispin Flower <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:35:37 +0100

107 lines

Re: HEGEL - access and standards

Leif Isaksen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:17:59 +0100

145 lines

Re: HEGEL - access and standards

CARLISLE, Philip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:33:37 +0100

45 lines

Re: HEGEL - access and standards

CARLISLE, Philip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:42:05 +0100

88 lines

Re: HEGEL - access and standards

Leif Isaksen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:46:09 +0100

109 lines

Re: HEGEL - access and standards

Nick Boldrini <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 13:23:04 +0100

165 lines

Re: HEGEL - access and standards

Sarah Poppy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:05:03 +0100

46 lines

Re: HEGEL - access and standards

Crispin Flower <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 23:06:29 +0100

258 lines

Re: HEGEL - access and standards

Martin Locock <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Aug 2010 08:18:21 +0100

49 lines

Re: HEGEL - access and standards

Simon Walton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:18:13 +0100

290 lines

Re: HEGEL - access and standards

geoff carver <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Aug 2010 10:52:29 +0200

30 lines

New Thread

HEGEL - access to theses

Re: HEGEL - access to theses

CAMPBELL, Gill <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:35:08 +0100

94 lines

Re: HEGEL - access to theses

Isabel Holroyd <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:58:03 +0100

267 lines

New Thread

HEGEL - an aside on knowledge sharing

HEGEL - an aside on knowledge sharing

LEE, Edmund <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 14:04:44 +0100

234 lines

Re: HEGEL - an aside on knowledge sharing

geoff carver <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:12:10 +0200

170 lines

Re: HEGEL - an aside on knowledge sharing

Nick Boldrini <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:33:14 +0100

500 lines

New Thread

HEGEL - approaches to development

HEGEL - approaches to development

LEE, Edmund <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:46:07 +0100

141 lines

Re: HEGEL - approaches to development

REYNOLDS, Trevor <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:14:11 +0100

269 lines

Re: HEGEL - approaches to development

Nick Boldrini <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:14:25 +0100

382 lines

Re: HEGEL - approaches to development

LEE, Edmund <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Aug 2010 10:21:42 +0100

242 lines

New Thread

HEGEL - background to the project

HEGEL - background to the project

LEE, Edmund <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:40:05 +0100

307 lines

Re: HEGEL - background to the project

Nick Boldrini <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:40:20 +0100

667 lines

Re: HEGEL - background to the project

Isabel Holroyd <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 15:15:19 +0100

885 lines

New Thread

HEGEL - comments on thread

HEGEL - comments on thread

Jill Hind <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Aug 2010 10:23:46 +0100

64 lines

New Thread

HEGEL - First summary

HEGEL - First summary

LEE, Edmund <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Aug 2010 13:15:51 +0100

189 lines

New Thread

HEGEL - Further comments

HEGEL - Further comments

LEE, Edmund <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Aug 2010 13:48:27 +0100

78 lines

New Thread

HEGEL - how a standard for grey literature might help.

HEGEL - how a standard for grey literature might help.

LEE, Edmund <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:07:22 +0100

404 lines

Re: HEGEL - how a standard for grey literature might help.

Martin Locock <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:46:04 +0100

53 lines

Re: HEGEL - how a standard for grey literature might help.

Nick Boldrini <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:25:04 +0100

300 lines

Re: HEGEL - how a standard for grey literature might help.

LEE, Edmund <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:52:35 +0100

286 lines

Re: HEGEL - how a standard for grey literature might help.

Martin Locock <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:50:53 +0100

44 lines

Re: HEGEL - how a standard for grey literature might help.

Paul Gilman AAG Manager ES <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:59:20 +0100

83 lines

Re: HEGEL - how a standard for grey literature might help.

HUNTLEY, Jacqui <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 14:41:28 +0100

200 lines

Re: HEGEL - how a standard for grey literature might help.

Emily Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 14:55:27 +0100

172 lines

Re: HEGEL - how a standard for grey literature might help.

LEE, Edmund <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:57:49 +0100

119 lines

New Thread

HEGEL - quality of existing grey literature

HEGEL - quality of existing grey literature

LEE, Edmund <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:37:22 +0100

240 lines

New Thread

HEGEL - survey of existing standards

HEGEL - survey of existing standards

LEE, Edmund <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:14:03 +0100

242 lines

Re: HEGEL - survey of existing standards

Alan Rosevear <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:40:42 -0400

50 lines

New Thread

HEGEL - thanks and next steps

HEGEL - thanks and next steps

LEE, Edmund <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:07:31 +0100

113 lines

Re: HEGEL - thanks and next steps

ADAMS, Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:17:02 +0100

310 lines

Re: HEGEL - thanks and next steps

TURNER, Emma <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:21:12 +0100

247 lines

New Thread

HEGEL - what a standard might look like

HEGEL - what a standard might look like

LEE, Edmund <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Aug 2010 10:34:47 +0100

159 lines

Re: HEGEL - what a standard might look like

CAMPBELL, Gill <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Aug 2010 11:12:45 +0100

292 lines

Re: HEGEL - what a standard might look like

Nick Boldrini <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Aug 2010 11:18:53 +0100

555 lines

Re: HEGEL - what a standard might look like

Martin Locock <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Aug 2010 11:49:37 +0100

42 lines

Re: HEGEL - what a standard might look like

LEE, Edmund <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Aug 2010 11:58:15 +0100

303 lines

HEGEL - what a standard might look like

Stuart Jeffrey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:04:48 +0100

181 lines

Re: HEGEL - what a standard might look like

Nick Boldrini <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:49:54 +0100

85 lines

Re: HEGEL - what a standard might look like

MAY, Keith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Aug 2010 13:00:44 +0100

503 lines

Re: HEGEL - what a standard might look like

CAMPBELL, Gill <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Aug 2010 09:59:45 +0100

71 lines

New Thread

HEGEL discussion - Agenda

HEGEL discussion - Agenda

LEE, Edmund <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 10:26:22 +0100

109 lines

New Thread

HEGEL Stakeholders list

HEGEL Stakeholders list

LEE, Edmund <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 12:41:26 +0100

153 lines

New Thread

Historic dates in HTML5

Historic dates in HTML5

Andy Mabbett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Aug 2010 09:36:26 +0100

52 lines

Re: Historic dates in HTML5

Nick Boldrini <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Aug 2010 09:45:09 +0100

111 lines

Re: Historic dates in HTML5

ADAMS, Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Aug 2010 09:59:11 +0100

144 lines

Re: Historic dates in HTML5

Tudhope D S (AT) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:14:05 +0000

179 lines

New Thread

Kate Wall/Hertford/ENV/HertsCC is out of the office.

Kate Wall/Hertford/ENV/HertsCC is out of the office.

Kate Batt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Aug 2010 10:06:19 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

Political parameters

Political parameters

Jenny Hall <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 09:52:43 +0000

38 lines

Re: Political parameters

LEE, Edmund <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:23:26 +0100

132 lines

New Thread

Preamble

Preamble

LEE, Edmund <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 10:20:05 +0100

160 lines

New Thread

Proposed standard for the structure of grey literature - FISH discussion starting today!

Proposed standard for the structure of grey literature - FISH discussion starting today!

TURNER, Emma <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 10:05:27 +0100

171 lines

New Thread

REMINDER: ISKO UK one-day conference on Linked data - London, 14 September

REMINDER: ISKO UK one-day conference on Linked data - London, 14 September

Aida Slavic <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 14:02:57 +0100

76 lines

New Thread

Standard for Grey Literature

Standard for Grey Literature

NCampling <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 22:42:47 +0100

243 lines

Re: Standard for Grey Literature

geoff carver <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 23:51:08 +0200

277 lines

Re: Standard for Grey Literature

Jenny Hall <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 22:05:51 +0000

79 lines

Re: Standard for Grey Literature

LEE, Edmund <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:27:54 +0100

180 lines

Re: Standard for Grey Literature

CAMPBELL, Gill <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:57:50 +0100

237 lines

Re: Standard for Grey Literature

Nick Boldrini <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:09:46 +0100

479 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
April 2017
March 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
September 2016
July 2016
June 2016
February 2016
January 2016
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
October 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
February 2012
January 2012
November 2011
October 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager