JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


August 2010


View:

Show Author | Hide Author

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject

From

Date Sorted by Date, Most Recent First

Size

Re: pre-ticked opt in boxes

Roland Perry

Tue, 31 Aug 2010 21:11:40 +0100

43 lines

Re: pre-ticked opt in boxes

Tim Trent

Tue, 31 Aug 2010 21:08:31 +0100

414 lines

Re: pre-ticked opt in boxes

Chris Spray

Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:59:53 +0100

132 lines

Re: pre-ticked opt in boxes

Roland Perry

Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:35:15 +0100

47 lines

Re: pre-ticked opt in boxes

Marchini, Renzo

Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:15:45 -0400

412 lines

Re: pre-ticked opt in boxes

Roland Perry

Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:42:28 +0100

53 lines

pre-ticked opt in boxes

Tim Trent

Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:06:23 +0100

162 lines

Financial Services Records Management: Regulatory Compliance, Security and Legal Issues

Julie Valentine

Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:29:53 +0100

103 lines

Hawktalk: Data Protection and the use of the Internet to vet employees or job applicants

chris pounder

Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:58:11 +0100

307 lines

Part-time DPA/FOI Officer role wanted

Dave and Suzy

Fri, 27 Aug 2010 10:07:29 +0100

128 lines

Re: Disciplinary scenario.

Bradshaw, Phillip

Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:16:44 +0100

101 lines

Disciplinary scenario.

Priestley Sarah

Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:01:26 +0100

45 lines

Re: Statistics

Tim Trent

Thu, 26 Aug 2010 10:16:17 +0100

283 lines

Re: Statistics

Dinsdale, Peter

Thu, 26 Aug 2010 10:07:45 +0100

952 lines

Re: Statistics

Bradshaw, Phillip

Thu, 26 Aug 2010 10:05:25 +0100

680 lines

Re: Statistics

Tim Turner

Thu, 26 Aug 2010 10:05:23 +0100

687 lines

Re: Statistics

Tim Turner

Thu, 26 Aug 2010 09:59:27 +0100

770 lines

Re: Statistics

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 26 Aug 2010 09:46:53 +0100

585 lines

Re: Statistics

Tim Trent

Thu, 26 Aug 2010 09:41:28 +0100

737 lines

Re: Statistics

Tim Turner

Thu, 26 Aug 2010 09:30:19 +0100

385 lines

Re: Statistics

Tim Trent

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 17:17:18 +0100

196 lines

Statistics

Brenda Scourfield

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:25:51 +0100

35 lines

Re: FW: Retention of subject access requests

Roland Perry

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 15:22:04 +0100

40 lines

Re: Wheelie bin cctv

Roland Perry

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:28:44 +0100

120 lines

Re: FW: Retention of subject access requests

Lynn Wyeth

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:12:58 +0100

30 lines

Re: FW: Retention of subject access requests

Bailey, Trish

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:59:19 +0100

186 lines

Re: FW: Retention of subject access requests

Bradshaw, Phillip

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:42:52 +0100

238 lines

FW: Retention of subject access requests

Bailey, Trish

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:09:19 +0100

641 lines

Re: Retention of subject access requests

Bradshaw, Phillip

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:37:07 +0100

623 lines

Re: Wheelie bin cctv

Marchini, Renzo

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 07:29:21 -0400

141 lines

Re: Wheelie bin cctv

Roland Perry

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:22:31 +0100

81 lines

Re: Wheelie bin cctv

Bradshaw, Phillip

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:21:55 +0100

65 lines

Re: Retention of subject access requests

Tim Trent

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:18:41 +0100

341 lines

Re: Wheelie bin cctv

Roland Perry

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:18:13 +0100

46 lines

Re: Wheelie bin cctv

Marchini, Renzo

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 07:14:05 -0400

97 lines

Re: Retention of subject access requests

Ray Cooke

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:13:09 +0100

308 lines

Re: Wheelie bin cctv

Roland Perry

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:10:40 +0100

46 lines

Re: Wheelie bin cctv

Tim Turner

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 11:59:19 +0100

104 lines

Re: Retention of subject access requests

Bradshaw, Phillip

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 11:54:47 +0100

80 lines

Retention of subject access requests

Brenda Scourfield

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 11:50:37 +0100

27 lines

Re: Wheelie bin cctv

Marchini, Renzo

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 06:32:01 -0400

98 lines

Re: Wheelie bin cctv

Roland Perry

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 11:10:10 +0100

37 lines

Re: Wheelie bin cctv

Roland Perry

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 11:07:22 +0100

37 lines

Re: s33a and grievance emails

Bradshaw, Phillip

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:53:26 +0100

149 lines

Re: Wheelie bin cctv

Bradshaw, Phillip

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:35:55 +0100

575 lines

Job description

Casillas, Mojgan

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:02:00 +0100

241 lines

Re: Lindqvist and Wheelie bin cctv

Tim Trent

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 09:40:15 +0100

655 lines

Lindqvist and Wheelie bin cctv

chris pounder

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 09:36:14 +0100

651 lines

Re: Web Service Terms and Conditions

Andrew Cormack

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 08:28:25 +0000

329 lines

Re: Wheelie bin cctv

Tim Turner

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 09:12:55 +0100

429 lines

Re: Wheelie bin cctv

Tim Trent

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 08:55:41 +0100

227 lines

Data Loss & Fines

Paula Tighe

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 08:28:15 +0100

457 lines

Wheelie bin cctv

Roland Perry

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 07:27:29 +0100

42 lines

s33a and grievance emails

Lawrence Serewicz

Tue, 24 Aug 2010 22:54:31 +0100

104 lines

Re: Web Service Terms and Conditions

Tim Trent

Tue, 24 Aug 2010 21:32:30 +0100

482 lines

Re: Web Service Terms and Conditions

Lawrence Serewicz

Tue, 24 Aug 2010 21:05:02 +0100

183 lines

Re: Web Service Terms and Conditions

Marchini, Renzo

Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:23:32 -0400

114 lines

Re: Data loss fine

Dunster, Jon

Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:41:50 +0100

890 lines

Re: Data loss fine

James Walkom

Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:31:50 +0100

775 lines

Re: Data loss fine

Dunster, Jon

Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:28:20 +0100

484 lines

Re: Web Service Terms and Conditions

Tim Trent

Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:54:04 +0100

667 lines

Re: Web Service Terms and Conditions

Lawrence Serewicz

Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:43:07 +0100

968 lines

Re: Web Service Terms and Conditions

Bradshaw, Phillip

Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:35:34 +0100

361 lines

Re: Web Service Terms and Conditions

Tim Trent

Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:22:01 +0100

227 lines

Web Service Terms and Conditions

Phil Bradshaw

Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:45:25 +0100

35 lines

Data loss fine

Nic Drew (Cardiff and Vale UHB - IT Security)

Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:16:29 +0100

199 lines

Staff data Protection offence reference

chris pounder

Tue, 24 Aug 2010 09:39:39 +0100

283 lines

Re: Session Logs - Retention

Andrew Cormack

Mon, 23 Aug 2010 12:57:59 +0000

108 lines

Re: FW: Hawktalk: Data Protection and surveillance: swopping the speed camera for ANPR?

Roland Perry

Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:24:50 +0100

52 lines

Session Logs - Retention

Ray Cooke

Mon, 23 Aug 2010 12:44:35 +0100

76 lines

Re: FW: Hawktalk: Data Protection and surveillance: swapping the speed camera for ANPR?

Giles, Kevin

Mon, 23 Aug 2010 11:12:05 +0100

621 lines

FW: Hawktalk: Data Protection and surveillance: swopping the speed camera for ANPR?

chris pounder

Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:31:31 +0100

205 lines

Re: Section 35

Bradshaw, Phillip

Fri, 20 Aug 2010 11:05:52 +0100

72 lines

Re: Section 35

Cotterill, Steve

Fri, 20 Aug 2010 09:09:18 +0100

123 lines

Re: Should Google (etc) reveal the identity of the cyberstalker?

Roland Perry

Fri, 20 Aug 2010 06:20:21 +0100

46 lines

Re: Section 35

Bradshaw, Phillip

Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:02:28 +0100

140 lines

Re: Section 35

David Wilson

Thu, 19 Aug 2010 15:46:19 +0100

117 lines

Re: Section 35

Tim Turner

Thu, 19 Aug 2010 15:44:39 +0100

76 lines

Section 35

Brenda Scourfield

Thu, 19 Aug 2010 15:38:58 +0100

48 lines

Should Google (etc) reveal the identity of the cyberstalker?

Tim Trent

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 22:11:18 +0100

145 lines

Re: Fraud?

Cotterill, Steve

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:33:24 +0100

231 lines

Re: Information Kept on Back-Ups

George Ross

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 13:54:57 +0100

50 lines

Re: Information Kept on Back-Ups

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 13:53:36 +0100

103 lines

Re: Information Kept on Back-Ups

Healy, Susan

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 13:52:40 +0100

247 lines

Re: Information Kept on Back-Ups

David Wilson

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 13:37:50 +0100

351 lines

Re: Information Kept on Back-Ups

Healy, Susan

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 13:00:30 +0100

750 lines

Re: Information Kept on Back-Ups

Scourfield, Brenda

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:55:44 +0100

932 lines

Re: Information Kept on Back-Ups

Bradshaw, Phillip

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:40:12 +0100

231 lines

Googles Chief's Fears for Generation Facebook

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:11:16 +0100

152 lines

Information Kept on Back-Ups

Ann-Marie Noble

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:56:46 +0100

127 lines

Re: Admitting breaches

Tim Trent

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:21:22 +0100

113 lines

Re: Admitting breaches

David Wilson

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:12:10 +0100

68 lines

Admitting breaches

Phil Bradshaw

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:44:40 +0100

38 lines

Job Vacancy - 12 Month Database Project Manager with knowledge of DPA and FOI - Central London

Andy Johnson

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:01:22 +0100

50 lines

Re: Fraud?

Tim Turner

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:32:47 +0100

601 lines

Re: Fraud?

Bradshaw, Phillip

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:44:13 +0100

388 lines

Re: CCTV disclosure by another means? The duck test. :)

Lawrence Serewicz

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:21:24 +0100

368 lines

Re: Magazine subscription list and bankruptcy

Tim Trent

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 17:27:40 +0100

301 lines

Re: Magazine subscription list and bankruptcy

Tim Trent

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 17:16:28 +0100

157 lines

Re: Fraud?

Tim Trent

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:51:17 +0100

377 lines

Fraud?

Cotterill, Steve

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:46:07 +0100

221 lines

FOIA request re: Information on successful and unsuccessful tenderers

Barlow, Jackie

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:52:07 +0100

196 lines

Hawktalk: Who gets the Audit Commission's privacy invasive powers?

chris pounder

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 12:57:51 +0100

232 lines

Re: Parental access to student records

Jackie Milne

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 12:34:55 +0100

53 lines

Re: Parental access to student records

Dunster, Jon

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:09:25 +0100

89 lines

Re: CCTV disclosure by another means?

Tim Turner

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 09:46:44 +0100

207 lines

Re: CCTV disclosure by another means?

Gareth Davidson

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 09:39:19 +0100

313 lines

Re: CCTV disclosure by another means?

Lawrence Serewicz

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 09:32:54 +0100

220 lines

Re: CCTV disclosure by another means?

Gareth Davidson

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 08:58:31 +0100

150 lines

Re: CCTV disclosure by another means?

Lawrence Serewicz

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 18:06:02 +0100

282 lines

Re: CCTV disclosure by another means?

Lawrence Serewicz

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 18:02:11 +0100

175 lines

Re: CCTV disclosure by another means?

Bradshaw, Phillip

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 17:39:46 +0100

156 lines

Part-time DPA/FOI Officer role wanted

Dave and Suzy

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 17:33:18 +0100

120 lines

Re: CCTV disclosure by another means?

Alan Stead

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 17:09:03 +0100

145 lines

Re: CCTV disclosure by another means?

Cotterill, Steve

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 16:42:52 +0100

163 lines

CCTV disclosure by another means?

Lawrence Serewicz

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 16:33:02 +0100

83 lines

Re: Parental access to student records

Jackie Milne

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 16:01:58 +0100

36 lines

Re: Parental access to student records

Jackie Milne

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 15:56:41 +0100

55 lines

Re: Smartphone Photos and Privacy

Roland Perry

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 13:51:11 +0100

48 lines

Re: Smartphone Photos and Privacy

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 13:10:25 +0100

268 lines

Re: Smartphone Photos and Privacy

Bradshaw, Phillip

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 13:04:11 +0100

657 lines

Re: Smartphone Photos and Privacy

Tim Turner

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 12:12:18 +0100

512 lines

Re: Smartphone Photos and Privacy

Andrew Cormack

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:08:01 +0000

177 lines

Re: Smartphone Photos and Privacy

Tim Trent

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 12:01:16 +0100

285 lines

Smartphone Photos and Privacy

Ibrahim Hasan

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 09:48:09 +0100

138 lines

Re: Police Database

Harrison, Iain

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 09:39:05 +0100

854 lines

Out of the office

Janice Miller

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 04:03:04 +0100

48 lines

Can you help please - FOI related question

Giles, Kevin

Thu, 12 Aug 2010 17:57:58 +0100

173 lines

Re: Police Database

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 12 Aug 2010 17:26:35 +0100

463 lines

Re: Police Database

Ben Plouviez

Thu, 12 Aug 2010 14:04:14 +0100

693 lines

Re: Police Database

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee

Thu, 12 Aug 2010 14:02:04 +0100

156 lines

Re: Police Database

Carolyn Howard

Thu, 12 Aug 2010 13:58:38 +0100

103 lines

Re: Police Database

Harrison, Iain

Thu, 12 Aug 2010 13:47:46 +0100

425 lines

Police Database

Ibrahim Hasan

Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:46:33 +0100

167 lines

BS 10012

Marchini, Renzo

Thu, 12 Aug 2010 06:16:18 -0400

59 lines

BS 10012

Renzo Marchini

Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:38:33 +0100

35 lines

Re: Megrahi's Medical Records

Ward, Ciaran

Wed, 11 Aug 2010 10:49:58 +0100

675 lines

Megrahi's Medical Records

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 11 Aug 2010 10:05:51 +0100

167 lines

Webcast Recording

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 11 Aug 2010 10:03:18 +0100

171 lines

Stirland - coroners report

Roland Perry

Wed, 11 Aug 2010 07:57:54 +0100

33 lines

Re: percolation of DoB - is this OK?

Griffiths, Ian

Wed, 11 Aug 2010 07:32:57 +0100

170 lines

Re: Benefit fraud: Cameron defends use of credit rate firms

Lawrence Serewicz

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 22:30:58 +0100

119 lines

Re: Benefit fraud: Cameron defends use of credit rate firms

Roland Perry

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 21:41:07 +0100

47 lines

Re: percolation of DoB - is this OK?

Tim Trent

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:31:39 +0100

187 lines

Re: Benefit fraud: Cameron defends use of credit rate firms

Lawrence Serewicz

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:26:51 +0100

677 lines

Re: Benefit fraud: Cameron defends use of credit rate firms

chris pounder

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:18:34 +0100

365 lines

Re: Benefit fraud: Cameron defends use of credit rate firms

Tim Trent

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:05:26 +0100

239 lines

Re: Benefit fraud: Cameron defends use of credit rate firms

Roland Perry

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 16:54:56 +0100

59 lines

Re: percolation of DoB - is this OK?

Mark van Harmelen

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 16:48:46 +0100

102 lines

percolation of DoB - is this OK?

Mark van Harmelen

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 16:43:16 +0100

66 lines

Re: Benefit fraud: Cameron defends use of credi t rate firms

Bradshaw, Phillip

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 16:10:37 +0100

164 lines

Re: Benefit fraud: Cameron defends use of credi t rate firms

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:45:10 +0100

380 lines

Re: Landlord question

Tim Trent

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:41:44 +0100

557 lines

Re: Landlord question

Giles, Kevin

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:36:49 +0100

478 lines

Re: Landlord question

Paul Ticher

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:32:32 +0100

77 lines

Benefit fraud: Cameron defends use of credit rate firms

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:30:08 +0100

154 lines

Re: Landlord question

Roland Perry

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:23:20 +0100

43 lines

Landlord question

Brenda Scourfield

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:16:47 +0100

33 lines

Re: Data Security Breaches

Emma Butler

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:32:57 +0100

33 lines

Re: Body Scanners and retained images

Roland Perry

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:03:41 +0100

42 lines

Body Scanners and retained images

chris pounder

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 12:21:50 +0100

805 lines

RIPA Webcast Today at 11am

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:49:38 +0100

164 lines

Re: Body Scanners and retained images

Roland Perry

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:32:58 +0100

50 lines

Re: Body Scanners and retained images

Lawrence Serewicz

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:09:30 +0100

254 lines

Re: Data Security Breaches

Tim Turner

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:02:05 +0100

283 lines

Data Security Breaches

Nic Drew (Cardiff and Vale UHB - IT Security)

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 08:41:56 +0100

208 lines

Body Scanners and retained images

Tim Trent

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 08:05:40 +0100

101 lines

Swimming in the surveillance Poole: the real privacy problems with RIPA

chris pounder

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 18:05:14 +0100

336 lines

Re: Low Level Help

Baines, Jonathan

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 12:11:34 +0100

145 lines

Re: Low Level Help

Bradshaw, Phillip

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 11:56:00 +0100

66 lines

Re: Low Level Help

Bradshaw, Phillip

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 11:52:40 +0100

361 lines

Re: Low Level Help

Giles, Kevin

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 11:44:30 +0100

161 lines

Re: Low Level Help

Jonathan Baines

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 11:39:13 +0100

38 lines

Low Level Help

Trevor Pearce

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 11:21:11 +0100

259 lines

Re: Parental access to student records

Bradshaw, Phillip

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 10:53:15 +0100

76 lines

Re: Parental access to student records

Tim Turner

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 10:49:54 +0100

215 lines

Re: Sarah's Law

Roland Perry

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 10:35:38 +0100

52 lines

Re: Parental access to student records

McCluskey, Stephanie

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 10:27:23 +0100

233 lines

Re: Sarah's Law

Tim Turner

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 09:30:15 +0100

165 lines

Re: Sarah's Law

Roland Perry

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 09:20:17 +0100

196 lines

Fancy a data protection job in Albania?

chris pounder

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 07:57:46 +0100

888 lines

Re: Sarah's Law

Bradshaw, Phillip

Sun, 8 Aug 2010 17:38:37 +0100

230 lines

Sarah's Law

chris pounder

Sun, 8 Aug 2010 12:55:33 +0100

413 lines

Re: Parental access to student records

Bradshaw, Phillip

Fri, 6 Aug 2010 18:04:01 +0100

121 lines

Re: Use of S7 by police

Bradshaw, Phillip

Fri, 6 Aug 2010 17:47:12 +0100

124 lines

Re: Use of S7 by police

Harrison, Iain

Fri, 6 Aug 2010 17:35:45 +0100

94 lines

Re: Parental access to student records

Dunster, Jon

Fri, 6 Aug 2010 17:32:47 +0100

91 lines

Use of S7 by police

Richard Birmingham

Fri, 6 Aug 2010 17:04:47 +0100

29 lines

Re: Proposed NCP facial recognition trial in Manchester

Bradshaw, Phillip

Fri, 6 Aug 2010 16:13:27 +0100

308 lines

Re: Proposed NCP facial recognition trial in Manchester

Kevin Tarleton (0161 923 6305)

Fri, 6 Aug 2010 15:57:37 +0100

666 lines

Proposed NCP facial recognition trial in Manchester

Mark van Harmelen

Fri, 6 Aug 2010 15:31:55 +0100

166 lines

Birmingham CCTV controversy continues

Ibrahim Hasan

Fri, 6 Aug 2010 14:10:32 +0100

137 lines

Re: Full Time Student Lists for Councils

Bradshaw, Phillip

Fri, 6 Aug 2010 10:56:38 +0100

502 lines

Re: Football club in breach of DPA

Ward, Ciaran

Fri, 6 Aug 2010 10:42:16 +0100

562 lines

Re: Full Time Student Lists for Councils

Tim Turner

Fri, 6 Aug 2010 10:35:59 +0100

329 lines

Full Time Student Lists for Councils

Mike Trebilcock

Fri, 6 Aug 2010 10:17:01 +0100

225 lines

Re: Football club in breach of DPA

Tim Turner

Fri, 6 Aug 2010 10:08:19 +0100

378 lines

Football club in breach of DPA

Ward, Ciaran

Fri, 6 Aug 2010 10:04:21 +0100

336 lines

Re: Transfer of personal data to a solicitor

Bradshaw, Phillip

Fri, 6 Aug 2010 10:01:39 +0100

231 lines

ContactPoint scrapped

Ibrahim Hasan

Fri, 6 Aug 2010 09:40:49 +0100

161 lines

Re: Transfer of personal data to a solicitor

Sarah Wickham

Fri, 6 Aug 2010 09:13:47 +0100

183 lines

RIPA Reports

Ibrahim Hasan

Thu, 5 Aug 2010 23:04:23 +0100

116 lines

Re: Transfer of personal data to a solicitor

Bradshaw, Phillip

Thu, 5 Aug 2010 17:05:42 +0100

102 lines

Re: Is Naomi Campbell a privacy issue?

Tim Trent

Thu, 5 Aug 2010 16:52:20 +0100

204 lines

Re: Is Naomi Campbell a privacy issue?

Roland Perry

Thu, 5 Aug 2010 16:49:22 +0100

42 lines

Transfer of personal data to a solicitor

Sarah Wickham

Thu, 5 Aug 2010 16:36:33 +0100

65 lines

Re: Is Naomi Campbell a privacy issue?

Baines, Jonathan

Thu, 5 Aug 2010 14:30:09 +0100

370 lines

Is Naomi Campbell a privacy issue?

Tim Trent

Thu, 5 Aug 2010 13:55:55 +0100

102 lines

Re: Poole Council Decision

Roland Perry

Thu, 5 Aug 2010 13:37:41 +0100

113 lines

Re: Poole Council Decision

Roland Perry

Thu, 5 Aug 2010 13:34:28 +0100

152 lines

Re: Poole Council Decision

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 5 Aug 2010 12:02:23 +0100

187 lines

Re: Poole Council Decision

Tim Turner

Thu, 5 Aug 2010 11:59:51 +0100

121 lines

Re: Poole Council Decision

Roland Perry

Thu, 5 Aug 2010 11:39:59 +0100

104 lines

Re: Poole Council Decision

Alan Stead

Thu, 5 Aug 2010 11:31:45 +0100

92 lines

Re: Poole Council Decision

Tim Turner

Thu, 5 Aug 2010 11:20:15 +0100

87 lines

Re: Poole Council Decision

Roland Perry

Thu, 5 Aug 2010 11:13:26 +0100

52 lines

Re: Poole Council Decision

Bradshaw, Phillip

Thu, 5 Aug 2010 09:18:45 +0100

65 lines

Re: Poole Council Decision

Roland Perry

Wed, 4 Aug 2010 21:54:35 +0100

57 lines

RIPA Review article

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 4 Aug 2010 21:31:11 +0100

136 lines

Re: Poole Council Decision

Lawrence Serewicz

Wed, 4 Aug 2010 19:57:07 +0100

415 lines

Re: Poole Council Decision

Roland Perry

Wed, 4 Aug 2010 18:31:07 +0100

45 lines

RIPA Update Webcast

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 4 Aug 2010 17:53:02 +0100

146 lines

Re: Poole Council Decision

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 4 Aug 2010 17:49:17 +0100

369 lines

Re: Poole Council Decision

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 4 Aug 2010 17:48:31 +0100

248 lines

Re: Poole Council Decision

Tim Trent

Wed, 4 Aug 2010 17:11:18 +0100

345 lines

Re: Poole Council Decision

Baines, Jonathan

Wed, 4 Aug 2010 17:07:07 +0100

104 lines

Re: Poole Council Decision

Roland Perry

Wed, 4 Aug 2010 16:59:26 +0100

40 lines

Re: Poole Council Decision

Baines, Jonathan

Wed, 4 Aug 2010 14:50:45 +0100

110 lines

Re: Sarah's Law

Roland Perry

Wed, 4 Aug 2010 14:18:44 +0100

35 lines

Re: Poole Council Decision

Roland Perry

Wed, 4 Aug 2010 14:17:40 +0100

47 lines

Re: [SPAM]Last CFP - International Conference WWW/Internet 2010: 3 September 2010

Tim Trent

Tue, 3 Aug 2010 18:22:10 +0100

172 lines

Last CFP - International Conference WWW/Internet 2010: 3 September 2010

Joseph Smith

Tue, 3 Aug 2010 17:29:11 +0100

168 lines

Re: Poole Council Decision

Baines, Jonathan

Mon, 2 Aug 2010 15:32:58 +0100

357 lines

Poole Council Decision

Ibrahim Hasan

Mon, 2 Aug 2010 15:20:01 +0100

122 lines

Sarah's Law

Ibrahim Hasan

Sun, 1 Aug 2010 21:38:31 +0100

123 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager