JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


August 2010


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

Admitting breaches (3 messages)
Benefit fraud: Cameron defends use of credi t rate firms (2 messages)
Benefit fraud: Cameron defends use of credit rate firms (7 messages)
Birmingham CCTV controversy continues (1 message)
Body Scanners and retained images (5 messages)
BS 10012 (2 messages)
Can you help please - FOI related question (1 message)
CCTV disclosure by another means? (10 messages)
CCTV disclosure by another means? The duck test. :) (1 message)
ContactPoint scrapped (1 message)
Data Loss & Fines (1 message)
Data loss fine (4 messages)
Data Security Breaches (3 messages)
Disciplinary scenario. (2 messages)
Fancy a data protection job in Albania? (1 message)
Financial Services Records Management: Regulatory Compliance, Security and Legal Issues (1 message)
FOIA request re: Information on successful and unsuccessful tenderers (1 message)
Football club in breach of DPA (3 messages)
Fraud? (5 messages)
Full Time Student Lists for Councils (3 messages)
FW: Hawktalk: Data Protection and surveillance: swapping the speed camera for ANPR? (1 message)
FW: Hawktalk: Data Protection and surveillance: swopping the speed camera for ANPR? (2 messages)
FW: Retention of subject access requests (5 messages)
Googles Chief's Fears for Generation Facebook (1 message)
Hawktalk: Data Protection and the use of the Internet to vet employees or job applicants (1 message)
Hawktalk: Who gets the Audit Commission's privacy invasive powers? (1 message)
Information Kept on Back-Ups (8 messages)
Is Naomi Campbell a privacy issue? (4 messages)
Job description (1 message)
Job Vacancy - 12 Month Database Project Manager with knowledge of DPA and FOI - Central London (1 message)
Landlord question (5 messages)
Last CFP - International Conference WWW/Internet 2010: 3 September 2010 (1 message)
Lindqvist and Wheelie bin cctv (2 messages)
Low Level Help (6 messages)
Magazine subscription list and bankruptcy (2 messages)
Megrahi's Medical Records (2 messages)
Out of the office (1 message)
Parental access to student records (9 messages)
Part-time DPA/FOI Officer role wanted (2 messages)
percolation of DoB - is this OK? (4 messages)
Police Database (7 messages)
Poole Council Decision (21 messages)
pre-ticked opt in boxes (7 messages)
Proposed NCP facial recognition trial in Manchester (3 messages)
Retention of subject access requests (5 messages)
RIPA Reports (1 message)
RIPA Review article (1 message)
RIPA Update Webcast (1 message)
RIPA Webcast Today at 11am (1 message)
s33a and grievance emails (2 messages)
Sarah's Law (7 messages)
Section 35 (6 messages)
Session Logs - Retention (2 messages)
Should Google (etc) reveal the identity of the cyberstalker? (2 messages)
Smartphone Photos and Privacy (7 messages)
Staff data Protection offence reference (1 message)
Statistics (10 messages)
Stirland - coroners report (1 message)
Swimming in the surveillance Poole: the real privacy problems with RIPA (1 message)
Transfer of personal data to a solicitor (4 messages)
Use of S7 by police (3 messages)
Web Service Terms and Conditions (9 messages)
Webcast Recording (1 message)
Wheelie bin cctv (15 messages)
[SPAM]Last CFP - International Conference WWW/Internet 2010: 3 September 2010 (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

Admitting breaches

Admitting breaches

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:44:40 +0100

38 lines

Re: Admitting breaches

David Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:12:10 +0100

68 lines

Re: Admitting breaches

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:21:22 +0100

113 lines

New Thread

Benefit fraud: Cameron defends use of credi t rate firms

Re: Benefit fraud: Cameron defends use of credi t rate firms

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:45:10 +0100

380 lines

Re: Benefit fraud: Cameron defends use of credi t rate firms

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 16:10:37 +0100

164 lines

New Thread

Benefit fraud: Cameron defends use of credit rate firms

Benefit fraud: Cameron defends use of credit rate firms

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:30:08 +0100

154 lines

Re: Benefit fraud: Cameron defends use of credit rate firms

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 16:54:56 +0100

59 lines

Re: Benefit fraud: Cameron defends use of credit rate firms

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:05:26 +0100

239 lines

Re: Benefit fraud: Cameron defends use of credit rate firms

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:18:34 +0100

365 lines

Re: Benefit fraud: Cameron defends use of credit rate firms

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:26:51 +0100

677 lines

Re: Benefit fraud: Cameron defends use of credit rate firms

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 21:41:07 +0100

47 lines

Re: Benefit fraud: Cameron defends use of credit rate firms

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 22:30:58 +0100

119 lines

New Thread

Birmingham CCTV controversy continues

Birmingham CCTV controversy continues

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Aug 2010 14:10:32 +0100

137 lines

New Thread

Body Scanners and retained images

Body Scanners and retained images

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 08:05:40 +0100

101 lines

Re: Body Scanners and retained images

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:09:30 +0100

254 lines

Re: Body Scanners and retained images

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:32:58 +0100

50 lines

Body Scanners and retained images

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 12:21:50 +0100

805 lines

Re: Body Scanners and retained images

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:03:41 +0100

42 lines

New Thread

BS 10012

BS 10012

Renzo Marchini <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:38:33 +0100

35 lines

BS 10012

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Aug 2010 06:16:18 -0400

59 lines

New Thread

Can you help please - FOI related question

Can you help please - FOI related question

Giles, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Aug 2010 17:57:58 +0100

173 lines

New Thread

CCTV disclosure by another means?

CCTV disclosure by another means?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 16:33:02 +0100

83 lines

Re: CCTV disclosure by another means?

Cotterill, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 16:42:52 +0100

163 lines

Re: CCTV disclosure by another means?

Alan Stead <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 17:09:03 +0100

145 lines

Re: CCTV disclosure by another means?

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 17:39:46 +0100

156 lines

Re: CCTV disclosure by another means?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 18:02:11 +0100

175 lines

Re: CCTV disclosure by another means?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 18:06:02 +0100

282 lines

Re: CCTV disclosure by another means?

Gareth Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 08:58:31 +0100

150 lines

Re: CCTV disclosure by another means?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 09:32:54 +0100

220 lines

Re: CCTV disclosure by another means?

Gareth Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 09:39:19 +0100

313 lines

Re: CCTV disclosure by another means?

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 09:46:44 +0100

207 lines

New Thread

CCTV disclosure by another means? The duck test. :)

Re: CCTV disclosure by another means? The duck test. :)

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:21:24 +0100

368 lines

New Thread

ContactPoint scrapped

ContactPoint scrapped

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Aug 2010 09:40:49 +0100

161 lines

New Thread

Data Loss & Fines

Data Loss & Fines

Paula Tighe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 08:28:15 +0100

457 lines

New Thread

Data loss fine

Data loss fine

Nic Drew (Cardiff and Vale UHB - IT Security) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:16:29 +0100

199 lines

Re: Data loss fine

Dunster, Jon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:28:20 +0100

484 lines

Re: Data loss fine

James Walkom <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:31:50 +0100

775 lines

Re: Data loss fine

Dunster, Jon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:41:50 +0100

890 lines

New Thread

Data Security Breaches

Data Security Breaches

Nic Drew (Cardiff and Vale UHB - IT Security) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 08:41:56 +0100

208 lines

Re: Data Security Breaches

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:02:05 +0100

283 lines

Re: Data Security Breaches

Emma Butler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:32:57 +0100

33 lines

New Thread

Disciplinary scenario.

Disciplinary scenario.

Priestley Sarah <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:01:26 +0100

45 lines

Re: Disciplinary scenario.

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:16:44 +0100

101 lines

New Thread

Fancy a data protection job in Albania?

Fancy a data protection job in Albania?

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 07:57:46 +0100

888 lines

New Thread

Financial Services Records Management: Regulatory Compliance, Security and Legal Issues

Financial Services Records Management: Regulatory Compliance, Security and Legal Issues

Julie Valentine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:29:53 +0100

103 lines

New Thread

FOIA request re: Information on successful and unsuccessful tenderers

FOIA request re: Information on successful and unsuccessful tenderers

Barlow, Jackie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:52:07 +0100

196 lines

New Thread

Football club in breach of DPA

Football club in breach of DPA

Ward, Ciaran <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Aug 2010 10:04:21 +0100

336 lines

Re: Football club in breach of DPA

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Aug 2010 10:08:19 +0100

378 lines

Re: Football club in breach of DPA

Ward, Ciaran <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Aug 2010 10:42:16 +0100

562 lines

New Thread

Fraud?

Fraud?

Cotterill, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:46:07 +0100

221 lines

Re: Fraud?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:51:17 +0100

377 lines

Re: Fraud?

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:44:13 +0100

388 lines

Re: Fraud?

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:32:47 +0100

601 lines

Re: Fraud?

Cotterill, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:33:24 +0100

231 lines

New Thread

Full Time Student Lists for Councils

Full Time Student Lists for Councils

Mike Trebilcock <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Aug 2010 10:17:01 +0100

225 lines

Re: Full Time Student Lists for Councils

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Aug 2010 10:35:59 +0100

329 lines

Re: Full Time Student Lists for Councils

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Aug 2010 10:56:38 +0100

502 lines

New Thread

FW: Hawktalk: Data Protection and surveillance: swapping the speed camera for ANPR?

Re: FW: Hawktalk: Data Protection and surveillance: swapping the speed camera for ANPR?

Giles, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Aug 2010 11:12:05 +0100

621 lines

New Thread

FW: Hawktalk: Data Protection and surveillance: swopping the speed camera for ANPR?

FW: Hawktalk: Data Protection and surveillance: swopping the speed camera for ANPR?

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:31:31 +0100

205 lines

Re: FW: Hawktalk: Data Protection and surveillance: swopping the speed camera for ANPR?

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:24:50 +0100

52 lines

New Thread

FW: Retention of subject access requests

FW: Retention of subject access requests

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:09:19 +0100

641 lines

Re: FW: Retention of subject access requests

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:42:52 +0100

238 lines

Re: FW: Retention of subject access requests

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:59:19 +0100

186 lines

Re: FW: Retention of subject access requests

Lynn Wyeth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:12:58 +0100

30 lines

Re: FW: Retention of subject access requests

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 15:22:04 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

Googles Chief's Fears for Generation Facebook

Googles Chief's Fears for Generation Facebook

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:11:16 +0100

152 lines

New Thread

Hawktalk: Data Protection and the use of the Internet to vet employees or job applicants

Hawktalk: Data Protection and the use of the Internet to vet employees or job applicants

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:58:11 +0100

307 lines

New Thread

Hawktalk: Who gets the Audit Commission's privacy invasive powers?

Hawktalk: Who gets the Audit Commission's privacy invasive powers?

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 12:57:51 +0100

232 lines

New Thread

Information Kept on Back-Ups

Information Kept on Back-Ups

Ann-Marie Noble <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:56:46 +0100

127 lines

Re: Information Kept on Back-Ups

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:40:12 +0100

231 lines

Re: Information Kept on Back-Ups

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:55:44 +0100

932 lines

Re: Information Kept on Back-Ups

Healy, Susan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 13:00:30 +0100

750 lines

Re: Information Kept on Back-Ups

David Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 13:37:50 +0100

351 lines

Re: Information Kept on Back-Ups

Healy, Susan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 13:52:40 +0100

247 lines

Re: Information Kept on Back-Ups

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 13:53:36 +0100

103 lines

Re: Information Kept on Back-Ups

George Ross <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 13:54:57 +0100

50 lines

New Thread

Is Naomi Campbell a privacy issue?

Is Naomi Campbell a privacy issue?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Aug 2010 13:55:55 +0100

102 lines

Re: Is Naomi Campbell a privacy issue?

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Aug 2010 14:30:09 +0100

370 lines

Re: Is Naomi Campbell a privacy issue?

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Aug 2010 16:49:22 +0100

42 lines

Re: Is Naomi Campbell a privacy issue?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Aug 2010 16:52:20 +0100

204 lines

New Thread

Job description

Job description

Casillas, Mojgan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:02:00 +0100

241 lines

New Thread

Job Vacancy - 12 Month Database Project Manager with knowledge of DPA and FOI - Central London

Job Vacancy - 12 Month Database Project Manager with knowledge of DPA and FOI - Central London

Andy Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:01:22 +0100

50 lines

New Thread

Landlord question

Landlord question

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:16:47 +0100

33 lines

Re: Landlord question

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:23:20 +0100

43 lines

Re: Landlord question

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:32:32 +0100

77 lines

Re: Landlord question

Giles, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:36:49 +0100

478 lines

Re: Landlord question

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:41:44 +0100

557 lines

New Thread

Last CFP - International Conference WWW/Internet 2010: 3 September 2010

Last CFP - International Conference WWW/Internet 2010: 3 September 2010

Joseph Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Aug 2010 17:29:11 +0100

168 lines

New Thread

Lindqvist and Wheelie bin cctv

Lindqvist and Wheelie bin cctv

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 09:36:14 +0100

651 lines

Re: Lindqvist and Wheelie bin cctv

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 09:40:15 +0100

655 lines

New Thread

Low Level Help

Low Level Help

Trevor Pearce <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 11:21:11 +0100

259 lines

Re: Low Level Help

Jonathan Baines <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 11:39:13 +0100

38 lines

Re: Low Level Help

Giles, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 11:44:30 +0100

161 lines

Re: Low Level Help

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 11:52:40 +0100

361 lines

Re: Low Level Help

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 11:56:00 +0100

66 lines

Re: Low Level Help

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 12:11:34 +0100

145 lines

New Thread

Magazine subscription list and bankruptcy

Re: Magazine subscription list and bankruptcy

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 17:16:28 +0100

157 lines

Re: Magazine subscription list and bankruptcy

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 17:27:40 +0100

301 lines

New Thread

Megrahi's Medical Records

Megrahi's Medical Records

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Aug 2010 10:05:51 +0100

167 lines

Re: Megrahi's Medical Records

Ward, Ciaran <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Aug 2010 10:49:58 +0100

675 lines

New Thread

Out of the office

Out of the office

Janice Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 04:03:04 +0100

48 lines

New Thread

Parental access to student records

Re: Parental access to student records

Dunster, Jon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Aug 2010 17:32:47 +0100

91 lines

Re: Parental access to student records

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Aug 2010 18:04:01 +0100

121 lines

Re: Parental access to student records

McCluskey, Stephanie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 10:27:23 +0100

233 lines

Re: Parental access to student records

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 10:49:54 +0100

215 lines

Re: Parental access to student records

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 10:53:15 +0100

76 lines

Re: Parental access to student records

Jackie Milne <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 15:56:41 +0100

55 lines

Re: Parental access to student records

Jackie Milne <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 16:01:58 +0100

36 lines

Re: Parental access to student records

Dunster, Jon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:09:25 +0100

89 lines

Re: Parental access to student records

Jackie Milne <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 12:34:55 +0100

53 lines

New Thread

Part-time DPA/FOI Officer role wanted

Part-time DPA/FOI Officer role wanted

Dave and Suzy <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 17:33:18 +0100

120 lines

Part-time DPA/FOI Officer role wanted

Dave and Suzy <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Aug 2010 10:07:29 +0100

128 lines

New Thread

percolation of DoB - is this OK?

percolation of DoB - is this OK?

Mark van Harmelen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 16:43:16 +0100

66 lines

Re: percolation of DoB - is this OK?

Mark van Harmelen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 16:48:46 +0100

102 lines

Re: percolation of DoB - is this OK?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:31:39 +0100

187 lines

Re: percolation of DoB - is this OK?

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Aug 2010 07:32:57 +0100

170 lines

New Thread

Police Database

Police Database

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:46:33 +0100

167 lines

Re: Police Database

Harrison, Iain <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Aug 2010 13:47:46 +0100

425 lines

Re: Police Database

Carolyn Howard <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Aug 2010 13:58:38 +0100

103 lines

Re: Police Database

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Aug 2010 14:02:04 +0100

156 lines

Re: Police Database

Ben Plouviez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Aug 2010 14:04:14 +0100

693 lines

Re: Police Database

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Aug 2010 17:26:35 +0100

463 lines

Re: Police Database

Harrison, Iain <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 09:39:05 +0100

854 lines

New Thread

Poole Council Decision

Poole Council Decision

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Aug 2010 15:20:01 +0100

122 lines

Re: Poole Council Decision

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Aug 2010 15:32:58 +0100

357 lines

Re: Poole Council Decision

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Aug 2010 14:17:40 +0100

47 lines

Re: Poole Council Decision

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Aug 2010 14:50:45 +0100

110 lines

Re: Poole Council Decision

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Aug 2010 16:59:26 +0100

40 lines

Re: Poole Council Decision

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Aug 2010 17:07:07 +0100

104 lines

Re: Poole Council Decision

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Aug 2010 17:11:18 +0100

345 lines

Re: Poole Council Decision

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Aug 2010 17:48:31 +0100

248 lines

Re: Poole Council Decision

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Aug 2010 17:49:17 +0100

369 lines

Re: Poole Council Decision

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Aug 2010 18:31:07 +0100

45 lines

Re: Poole Council Decision

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Aug 2010 19:57:07 +0100

415 lines

Re: Poole Council Decision

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Aug 2010 21:54:35 +0100

57 lines

Re: Poole Council Decision

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Aug 2010 09:18:45 +0100

65 lines

Re: Poole Council Decision

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Aug 2010 11:13:26 +0100

52 lines

Re: Poole Council Decision

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Aug 2010 11:20:15 +0100

87 lines

Re: Poole Council Decision

Alan Stead <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Aug 2010 11:31:45 +0100

92 lines

Re: Poole Council Decision

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Aug 2010 11:39:59 +0100

104 lines

Re: Poole Council Decision

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Aug 2010 11:59:51 +0100

121 lines

Re: Poole Council Decision

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Aug 2010 12:02:23 +0100

187 lines

Re: Poole Council Decision

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Aug 2010 13:34:28 +0100

152 lines

Re: Poole Council Decision

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Aug 2010 13:37:41 +0100

113 lines

New Thread

pre-ticked opt in boxes

pre-ticked opt in boxes

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:06:23 +0100

162 lines

Re: pre-ticked opt in boxes

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:42:28 +0100

53 lines

Re: pre-ticked opt in boxes

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:15:45 -0400

412 lines

Re: pre-ticked opt in boxes

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:35:15 +0100

47 lines

Re: pre-ticked opt in boxes

Chris Spray <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:59:53 +0100

132 lines

Re: pre-ticked opt in boxes

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Aug 2010 21:08:31 +0100

414 lines

Re: pre-ticked opt in boxes

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Aug 2010 21:11:40 +0100

43 lines

New Thread

Proposed NCP facial recognition trial in Manchester

Proposed NCP facial recognition trial in Manchester

Mark van Harmelen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Aug 2010 15:31:55 +0100

166 lines

Re: Proposed NCP facial recognition trial in Manchester

Kevin Tarleton (0161 923 6305) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Aug 2010 15:57:37 +0100

666 lines

Re: Proposed NCP facial recognition trial in Manchester

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Aug 2010 16:13:27 +0100

308 lines

New Thread

Retention of subject access requests

Retention of subject access requests

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 11:50:37 +0100

27 lines

Re: Retention of subject access requests

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 11:54:47 +0100

80 lines

Re: Retention of subject access requests

Ray Cooke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:13:09 +0100

308 lines

Re: Retention of subject access requests

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:18:41 +0100

341 lines

Re: Retention of subject access requests

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:37:07 +0100

623 lines

New Thread

RIPA Reports

RIPA Reports

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Aug 2010 23:04:23 +0100

116 lines

New Thread

RIPA Review article

RIPA Review article

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Aug 2010 21:31:11 +0100

136 lines

New Thread

RIPA Update Webcast

RIPA Update Webcast

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Aug 2010 17:53:02 +0100

146 lines

New Thread

RIPA Webcast Today at 11am

RIPA Webcast Today at 11am

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:49:38 +0100

164 lines

New Thread

s33a and grievance emails

s33a and grievance emails

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Aug 2010 22:54:31 +0100

104 lines

Re: s33a and grievance emails

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:53:26 +0100

149 lines

New Thread

Sarah's Law

Sarah's Law

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Aug 2010 21:38:31 +0100

123 lines

Re: Sarah's Law

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Aug 2010 14:18:44 +0100

35 lines

Sarah's Law

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Aug 2010 12:55:33 +0100

413 lines

Re: Sarah's Law

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Aug 2010 17:38:37 +0100

230 lines

Re: Sarah's Law

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 09:20:17 +0100

196 lines

Re: Sarah's Law

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 09:30:15 +0100

165 lines

Re: Sarah's Law

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 10:35:38 +0100

52 lines

New Thread

Section 35

Section 35

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Aug 2010 15:38:58 +0100

48 lines

Re: Section 35

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Aug 2010 15:44:39 +0100

76 lines

Re: Section 35

David Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Aug 2010 15:46:19 +0100

117 lines

Re: Section 35

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:02:28 +0100

140 lines

Re: Section 35

Cotterill, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Aug 2010 09:09:18 +0100

123 lines

Re: Section 35

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Aug 2010 11:05:52 +0100

72 lines

New Thread

Session Logs - Retention

Session Logs - Retention

Ray Cooke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Aug 2010 12:44:35 +0100

76 lines

Re: Session Logs - Retention

Andrew Cormack <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Aug 2010 12:57:59 +0000

108 lines

New Thread

Should Google (etc) reveal the identity of the cyberstalker?

Should Google (etc) reveal the identity of the cyberstalker?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 22:11:18 +0100

145 lines

Re: Should Google (etc) reveal the identity of the cyberstalker?

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Aug 2010 06:20:21 +0100

46 lines

New Thread

Smartphone Photos and Privacy

Smartphone Photos and Privacy

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 09:48:09 +0100

138 lines

Re: Smartphone Photos and Privacy

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 12:01:16 +0100

285 lines

Re: Smartphone Photos and Privacy

Andrew Cormack <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:08:01 +0000

177 lines

Re: Smartphone Photos and Privacy

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 12:12:18 +0100

512 lines

Re: Smartphone Photos and Privacy

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 13:04:11 +0100

657 lines

Re: Smartphone Photos and Privacy

SHQ - Gardiner, Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 13:10:25 +0100

268 lines

Re: Smartphone Photos and Privacy

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 13:51:11 +0100

48 lines

New Thread

Staff data Protection offence reference

Staff data Protection offence reference

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Aug 2010 09:39:39 +0100

283 lines

New Thread

Statistics

Statistics

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:25:51 +0100

35 lines

Re: Statistics

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 17:17:18 +0100

196 lines

Re: Statistics

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Aug 2010 09:30:19 +0100

385 lines

Re: Statistics

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Aug 2010 09:41:28 +0100

737 lines

Re: Statistics

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Aug 2010 09:46:53 +0100

585 lines

Re: Statistics

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Aug 2010 09:59:27 +0100

770 lines

Re: Statistics

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Aug 2010 10:05:25 +0100

680 lines

Re: Statistics

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Aug 2010 10:05:23 +0100

687 lines

Re: Statistics

Dinsdale, Peter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Aug 2010 10:07:45 +0100

952 lines

Re: Statistics

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Aug 2010 10:16:17 +0100

283 lines

New Thread

Stirland - coroners report

Stirland - coroners report

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Aug 2010 07:57:54 +0100

33 lines

New Thread

Swimming in the surveillance Poole: the real privacy problems with RIPA

Swimming in the surveillance Poole: the real privacy problems with RIPA

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 18:05:14 +0100

336 lines

New Thread

Transfer of personal data to a solicitor

Transfer of personal data to a solicitor

Sarah Wickham <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Aug 2010 16:36:33 +0100

65 lines

Re: Transfer of personal data to a solicitor

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Aug 2010 17:05:42 +0100

102 lines

Re: Transfer of personal data to a solicitor

Sarah Wickham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Aug 2010 09:13:47 +0100

183 lines

Re: Transfer of personal data to a solicitor

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Aug 2010 10:01:39 +0100

231 lines

New Thread

Use of S7 by police

Use of S7 by police

Richard Birmingham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Aug 2010 17:04:47 +0100

29 lines

Re: Use of S7 by police

Harrison, Iain <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Aug 2010 17:35:45 +0100

94 lines

Re: Use of S7 by police

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Aug 2010 17:47:12 +0100

124 lines

New Thread

Web Service Terms and Conditions

Web Service Terms and Conditions

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:45:25 +0100

35 lines

Re: Web Service Terms and Conditions

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:22:01 +0100

227 lines

Re: Web Service Terms and Conditions

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:35:34 +0100

361 lines

Re: Web Service Terms and Conditions

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:43:07 +0100

968 lines

Re: Web Service Terms and Conditions

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:54:04 +0100

667 lines

Re: Web Service Terms and Conditions

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:23:32 -0400

114 lines

Re: Web Service Terms and Conditions

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Aug 2010 21:05:02 +0100

183 lines

Re: Web Service Terms and Conditions

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Aug 2010 21:32:30 +0100

482 lines

Re: Web Service Terms and Conditions

Andrew Cormack <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 08:28:25 +0000

329 lines

New Thread

Webcast Recording

Webcast Recording

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Aug 2010 10:03:18 +0100

171 lines

New Thread

Wheelie bin cctv

Wheelie bin cctv

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 07:27:29 +0100

42 lines

Re: Wheelie bin cctv

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 08:55:41 +0100

227 lines

Re: Wheelie bin cctv

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 09:12:55 +0100

429 lines

Re: Wheelie bin cctv

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:35:55 +0100

575 lines

Re: Wheelie bin cctv

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 11:07:22 +0100

37 lines

Re: Wheelie bin cctv

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 11:10:10 +0100

37 lines

Re: Wheelie bin cctv

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 06:32:01 -0400

98 lines

Re: Wheelie bin cctv

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 11:59:19 +0100

104 lines

Re: Wheelie bin cctv

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:10:40 +0100

46 lines

Re: Wheelie bin cctv

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 07:14:05 -0400

97 lines

Re: Wheelie bin cctv

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:18:13 +0100

46 lines

Re: Wheelie bin cctv

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:21:55 +0100

65 lines

Re: Wheelie bin cctv

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:22:31 +0100

81 lines

Re: Wheelie bin cctv

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 07:29:21 -0400

141 lines

Re: Wheelie bin cctv

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:28:44 +0100

120 lines

New Thread

[SPAM]Last CFP - International Conference WWW/Internet 2010: 3 September 2010

Re: [SPAM]Last CFP - International Conference WWW/Internet 2010: 3 September 2010

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Aug 2010 18:22:10 +0100

172 lines

JISCMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager