JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DISTANCE-SAMPLING Archives


DISTANCE-SAMPLING Archives

DISTANCE-SAMPLING Archives


June 2010


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

compare decay rates (3 messages)
Comparing densities from different areas (1 message)
Distance 6.0 R2 in Windows 7 (3 messages)
evasive movements and sample size (2 messages)
if Distance gives bias estimates when transects are shortened post-survey what other methods can we use? (2 messages)
Mammal surveys in different sites: Comparisions (1 message)
Replacement of clusters by individuals (2 messages)
satisfactory choice for L given target precision, line transects (2 messages)
Suggestions for an alternative population estimation technique (4 messages)
using data collected from track based surveys. (3 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DISTANCE-SAMPLING Home

DISTANCE-SAMPLING Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

compare decay rates

compare decay rates

Sacha Viquerat <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jun 2010 10:23:54 +0200

35 lines

Re: compare decay rates

Eric Rexstad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jun 2010 13:32:28 +0100

80 lines

Re: compare decay rates

kfri sivaram <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jun 2010 11:17:29 +0530

135 lines

New Thread

Comparing densities from different areas

Comparing densities from different areas

Julie Langevin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:00:45 -0400

51 lines

New Thread

Distance 6.0 R2 in Windows 7

Distance 6.0 R2 in Windows 7

Greg Levandoski <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jun 2010 17:56:09 -0600

64 lines

Re: Distance 6.0 R2 in Windows 7

Len Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jun 2010 01:20:49 +0100

55 lines

Re: Distance 6.0 R2 in Windows 7

Greg Levandoski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jun 2010 13:24:31 -0600

87 lines

New Thread

evasive movements and sample size

evasive movements and sample size

David Scarpitti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jun 2010 19:43:58 +0100

42 lines

Re: evasive movements and sample size

Steve Buckland <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jun 2010 09:27:41 +0100

97 lines

New Thread

if Distance gives bias estimates when transects are shortened post-survey what other methods can we use?

if Distance gives bias estimates when transects are shortened post-survey what other methods can we use?

Sue O'Brien <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jun 2010 16:18:36 +0100

75 lines

Re: if Distance gives bias estimates when transects are shortened post-survey what other methods can we use?

Steve Buckland <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jun 2010 17:17:51 +0100

132 lines

New Thread

Mammal surveys in different sites: Comparisions

Re: Mammal surveys in different sites: Comparisions

KIHUMURO PHILLIP <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jun 2010 19:27:52 +0300

46 lines

New Thread

Replacement of clusters by individuals

Replacement of clusters by individuals

BRinK <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jun 2010 15:01:03 +0200

51 lines

Re: Replacement of clusters by individuals

Steve Buckland <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jun 2010 15:38:13 +0100

115 lines

New Thread

satisfactory choice for L given target precision, line transects

satisfactory choice for L given target precision, line transects

Robin W Hunnewell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jun 2010 09:50:25 -0700

50 lines

Re: satisfactory choice for L given target precision, line transects

Eric Rexstad <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jun 2010 19:24:13 +0100

133 lines

New Thread

Suggestions for an alternative population estimation technique

Suggestions for an alternative population estimation technique

kfri sivaram <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jun 2010 11:38:09 +0530

76 lines

Re: Suggestions for an alternative population estimation technique

Duane R. Diefenbach <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jun 2010 09:19:09 -0400

143 lines

Re: Suggestions for an alternative population estimation technique

Brett McClintock <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jun 2010 12:42:27 +0100

54 lines

Re: Suggestions for an alternative population estimation technique

kfri sivaram <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jun 2010 16:43:18 +0530

93 lines

New Thread

using data collected from track based surveys.

using data collected from track based surveys.

Brett Howland <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jun 2010 11:35:58 +0100

70 lines

Re: using data collected from track based surveys.

Eric Rexstad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jun 2010 13:55:09 +0100

134 lines

Re: using data collected from track based surveys.

Steve Buckland <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:27:57 +0100

102 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager