JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for GP-UK Archives


GP-UK Archives

GP-UK Archives


June 2010


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

A better sort of betting (5 messages)
A government policy I like (but NHS middle managers may not easily get their heads around) (2 messages)
a welcome casualty (7 messages)
another welcome casuality (12 messages)
Cloud backup service within N3? (1 message)
Cyberounds: Not for Celebrities Only, Unfortunately (1 message)
Cyberounds: Should She OR Shouldn't She? What women want to know. (1 message)
Discharge letters to patients (6 messages)
EMIS merged document templates - how do they do it (3 messages)
ePortfolio support (4 messages)
FW: Pulse Article - Coalition Government to retain Summary Care Record scheme (12 messages)
Fwd: URGENT HEALTH MESSAGE: CARE FOR PATIENTS RETURNING FROM FOOTBALL WORLD CUP IN SOUTH AFRICA (1 message)
GP Inquiry publishes first research and discussion papers (1 message)
Gulf Oil Spill (2 messages)
Gulf Oil Spill - adding legal considerations (3 messages)
Gulf Oil Spill - another little publicized fact (9 messages)
I sometimes think the NHS must be an organisation with a memory (6 messages)
Letters requesting information from Citizens Advice (10 messages)
Medical Evidence for Police. (7 messages)
N3 SMTP settings/local smtp server config (techy) (5 messages)
OT advice needed (9 messages)
prophylactic ssri's (21 messages)
prophylactic ssri's; now role of HVs (3 messages)
Protecting Footballers (5 messages)
Research volunteers needed (2 messages)
security for soar (11 messages)
Some DoH and NHS IT people should attend this meeting (1 message)
Statin effect on overall death rate (10 messages)
The Velluvial Matrix (4 messages)
Unbelievable (6 messages)
[vision] Anticoagulation (4 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

GP-UK Home

GP-UK Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

A better sort of betting

A better sort of betting

Walter Tim (FALKLAND SURGERY) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jun 2010 14:24:52 +0100

109 lines

Re: A better sort of betting

John Glasspool <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jun 2010 14:59:08 +0100

131 lines

Re: A better sort of betting

Walter Tim (FALKLAND SURGERY) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jun 2010 15:06:44 +0100

229 lines

Re: A better sort of betting

Gavin Jamie <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jun 2010 16:06:01 +0100

26 lines

Re: A better sort of betting

John Glasspool <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jun 2010 17:38:37 +0100

81 lines

New Thread

A government policy I like (but NHS middle managers may not easily get their heads around)

A government policy I like (but NHS middle managers may not easily get their heads around)

Adrian Midgley (Gmail) <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jun 2010 23:46:44 +0100

28 lines

Re: A government policy I like (but NHS middle managers may not easily get their heads around)

John Glasspool <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jun 2010 10:12:42 +0100

87 lines

New Thread

a welcome casualty

a welcome casualty

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Jun 2010 10:52:02 +0000

54 lines

Re: a welcome casualty

Edsousa <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jun 2010 21:34:48 +0100

36 lines

Re: a welcome casualty

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jun 2010 12:57:28 +0000

100 lines

Re: a welcome casualty

Adrian Midgley (Gmail) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jun 2010 14:10:35 +0100

13 lines

Re: a welcome casualty

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jun 2010 14:12:31 +0100

42 lines

Re: a welcome casualty

John Glasspool <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jun 2010 16:59:13 +0100

116 lines

Re: a welcome casualty

Adrian Midgley (Gmail) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jun 2010 19:49:37 +0100

24 lines

New Thread

another welcome casuality

another welcome casuality

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jun 2010 17:43:12 +0000

64 lines

Re: another welcome casuality

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jun 2010 19:29:59 +0100

42 lines

Re: another welcome casuality

Adrian Midgley (Gmail) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jun 2010 20:37:09 +0100

17 lines

Re: another welcome casuality

John Glasspool <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jun 2010 18:20:24 +0100

65 lines

Re: another welcome casuality

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:29:52 +0000

120 lines

Re: another welcome casuality

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jun 2010 19:36:33 +0100

71 lines

Re: another welcome casuality

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jun 2010 19:12:53 +0000

187 lines

Re: another welcome casuality

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jun 2010 11:44:08 +0100

33 lines

Re: another welcome casuality

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jun 2010 22:06:40 +0100

38 lines

Re: another welcome casuality

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jun 2010 22:28:20 +0100

24 lines

Re: another welcome casuality

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jun 2010 23:28:58 +0100

43 lines

Re: another welcome casuality

John Glasspool <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jun 2010 20:56:44 +0100

136 lines

New Thread

Cloud backup service within N3?

Cloud backup service within N3?

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:59:55 +0100

10 lines

New Thread

Cyberounds: Not for Celebrities Only, Unfortunately

Cyberounds: Not for Celebrities Only, Unfortunately

Harry Levy <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jun 2010 09:50:47 -0400

185 lines

New Thread

Cyberounds: Should She OR Shouldn't She? What women want to know.

Cyberounds: Should She OR Shouldn't She? What women want to know.

Harry Levy <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jun 2010 09:36:36 -0400

197 lines

New Thread

Discharge letters to patients

Discharge letters to patients

Chris Markwick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jun 2010 12:06:39 +0100

49 lines

Re: Discharge letters to patients

Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jun 2010 11:31:04 +0000

56 lines

Re: Discharge letters to patients

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jun 2010 13:53:38 +0100

98 lines

Re: Discharge letters to patients

John Glasspool <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jun 2010 15:00:17 +0100

145 lines

Re: Discharge letters to patients

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 8 Jun 2010 08:37:29 +0100

89 lines

Re: Discharge letters to patients

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jun 2010 15:34:51 +0100

98 lines

New Thread

EMIS merged document templates - how do they do it

EMIS merged document templates - how do they do it

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jun 2010 13:05:37 +0100

21 lines

Re: EMIS merged document templates - how do they do it

Gavin Jamie <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jun 2010 16:34:02 +0100

28 lines

Re: EMIS merged document templates - how do they do it

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jun 2010 17:56:57 +0100

57 lines

New Thread

ePortfolio support

ePortfolio support

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jun 2010 13:08:01 +0100

32 lines

Re: ePortfolio support

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jun 2010 13:20:21 +0100

28 lines

Re: ePortfolio support

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:11:41 +0100

22 lines

Re: ePortfolio support

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:29:57 +0100

26 lines

New Thread

FW: Pulse Article - Coalition Government to retain Summary Care Record scheme

FW: Pulse Article - Coalition Government to retain Summary Care Record scheme

Robert Treharne Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jun 2010 13:33:52 +0100

338 lines

Re: FW: Pulse Article - Coalition Government to retain Summary Care Record scheme

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jun 2010 15:55:57 +0100

49 lines

Re: FW: Pulse Article - Coalition Government to retain Summary Care Record scheme

Robert Treharne Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jun 2010 18:52:24 +0100

222 lines

Re: FW: Pulse Article - Coalition Government to retain Summary Care Record scheme

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jun 2010 19:37:04 +0100

62 lines

Re: FW: Pulse Article - Coalition Government to retain Summary Care Record scheme

Adrian Midgley (Gmail) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jun 2010 22:11:26 +0100

18 lines

Re: FW: Pulse Article - Coalition Government to retain Summary Care Record scheme

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jun 2010 22:14:50 +0100

42 lines

Re: FW: Pulse Article - Coalition Government to retain Summary Care Record scheme

David Royal <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Jun 2010 09:22:04 +0100

72 lines

Re: FW: Pulse Article - Coalition Government to retain Summary Care Record scheme

Adrian Midgley (Gmail) <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jun 2010 20:20:33 +0100

21 lines

Re: FW: Pulse Article - Coalition Government to retain Summary Care Record scheme

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jun 2010 22:11:58 +0100

28 lines

Re: FW: Pulse Article - Coalition Government to retain Summary Care Record scheme

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jun 2010 22:21:11 +0100

29 lines

Re: FW: Pulse Article - Coalition Government to retain Summary Care Record scheme

Russell Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jun 2010 22:16:16 +0100

108 lines

Re: FW: Pulse Article - Coalition Government to retain Summary Care Record scheme

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jun 2010 18:56:36 +0100

32 lines

New Thread

Fwd: URGENT HEALTH MESSAGE: CARE FOR PATIENTS RETURNING FROM FOOTBALL WORLD CUP IN SOUTH AFRICA

Fwd: URGENT HEALTH MESSAGE: CARE FOR PATIENTS RETURNING FROM FOOTBALL WORLD CUP IN SOUTH AFRICA

Paul Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jun 2010 20:23:50 +0100

200 lines

New Thread

GP Inquiry publishes first research and discussion papers

GP Inquiry publishes first research and discussion papers

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jun 2010 21:05:40 +0100

207 lines

New Thread

Gulf Oil Spill

Re: Gulf Oil Spill

Chris Markwick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jun 2010 08:11:29 +0100

12 lines

Re: Gulf Oil Spill

John Glasspool <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jun 2010 20:47:56 +0100

53 lines

New Thread

Gulf Oil Spill - adding legal considerations

Gulf Oil Spill - adding legal considerations

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jun 2010 08:57:22 +0100

55 lines

Re: Gulf Oil Spill - adding legal considerations

David Meldrum <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jun 2010 09:55:19 +0100

41 lines

Re: Gulf Oil Spill - adding legal considerations

John Glasspool <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jun 2010 20:49:43 +0100

111 lines

New Thread

Gulf Oil Spill - another little publicized fact

Re: Gulf Oil Spill - another little publicized fact

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jun 2010 22:20:03 +0100

37 lines

Re: Gulf Oil Spill - another little publicized fact

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jun 2010 12:42:56 +0100

61 lines

Re: Gulf Oil Spill - another little publicized fact

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jun 2010 12:46:47 +0100

19 lines

Re: Gulf Oil Spill - another little publicized fact

John Glasspool <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:35:13 +0100

59 lines

Re: Gulf Oil Spill - another little publicized fact

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:59:54 +0100

84 lines

Re: Gulf Oil Spill - another little publicized fact

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jun 2010 07:33:46 +0100

27 lines

Re: Gulf Oil Spill - another little publicized fact

Ken Clare <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jun 2010 11:34:32 +0100

38 lines

Re: Gulf Oil Spill - another little publicized fact

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jun 2010 22:20:35 +0100

53 lines

Re: Gulf Oil Spill - another little publicized fact

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Jun 2010 14:38:01 +0100

29 lines

New Thread

I sometimes think the NHS must be an organisation with a memory

I sometimes think the NHS must be an organisation with a memory

Adrian Midgley (Gmail) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jun 2010 15:54:05 +0100

16 lines

Re: I sometimes think the NHS must be an organisation with a memory

MICHAEL D'SOUZA <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jun 2010 01:00:24 +0100

26 lines

Re: I sometimes think the NHS must be an organisation with a memory

John Glasspool <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jun 2010 07:38:24 +0100

104 lines

Re: I sometimes think the NHS must be an organisation with a memory

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jun 2010 10:48:59 +0000

101 lines

Re: I sometimes think the NHS must be an organisation with a memory

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jun 2010 10:50:30 +0000

138 lines

Re: I sometimes think the NHS must be an organisation with a memory

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jun 2010 07:05:06 -0400

215 lines

New Thread

Letters requesting information from Citizens Advice

Letters requesting information from Citizens Advice

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jun 2010 14:30:09 +0100

93 lines

Re: Letters requesting information from Citizens Advice

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jun 2010 14:37:12 +0100

69 lines

Re: Letters requesting information from Citizens Advice

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jun 2010 15:33:53 +0100

179 lines

Re: Letters requesting information from Citizens Advice

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jun 2010 15:37:46 +0100

30 lines

Re: Letters requesting information from Citizens Advice

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jun 2010 19:48:16 +0100

31 lines

Re: Letters requesting information from Citizens Advice

Adrian Midgley (Gmail) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jun 2010 21:28:27 +0100

18 lines

Re: Letters requesting information from Citizens Advice

Emile de Sousa <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jun 2010 21:52:11 +0100

19 lines

Re: Letters requesting information from Citizens Advice

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jun 2010 22:18:48 +0100

30 lines

Re: Letters requesting information from Citizens Advice

Adrian Midgley (Gmail) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jun 2010 06:59:33 +0100

18 lines

Re: Letters requesting information from Citizens Advice

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jun 2010 20:50:50 +0100

34 lines

New Thread

Medical Evidence for Police.

Medical Evidence for Police.

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jun 2010 18:09:29 +0100

19 lines

Re: Medical Evidence for Police.

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jun 2010 18:24:10 +0100

30 lines

Re: Medical Evidence for Police.

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jun 2010 20:47:16 +0100

25 lines

Re: Medical Evidence for Police.

James McGlew <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jun 2010 21:13:51 +0000

99 lines

Re: Medical Evidence for Police.

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jun 2010 22:21:23 +0100

32 lines

Re: Medical Evidence for Police.

Emile de Sousa <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jun 2010 22:27:28 +0100

40 lines

Re: Medical Evidence for Police.

Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jun 2010 22:07:25 +0000

22 lines

New Thread

N3 SMTP settings/local smtp server config (techy)

Re: N3 SMTP settings/local smtp server config (techy)

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:24:41 +0100

51 lines

Re: N3 SMTP settings/local smtp server config (techy)

Gavin Jamie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:40:31 +0100

45 lines

Re: N3 SMTP settings/local smtp server config (techy)

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:02:56 +0100

55 lines

Re: N3 SMTP settings/local smtp server config (techy)

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jun 2010 12:48:45 +0100

14 lines

Re: N3 SMTP settings/local smtp server config (techy)

Adrian Midgley (Gmail) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jun 2010 19:19:20 +0100

21 lines

New Thread

OT advice needed

OT advice needed

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jun 2010 10:59:41 +0100

33 lines

Re: OT advice needed

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jun 2010 11:20:13 +0100

38 lines

Re: OT advice needed

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jun 2010 11:48:13 +0100

99 lines

Re: OT advice needed

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jun 2010 12:04:34 +0100

65 lines

Re: OT advice needed

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jun 2010 12:45:38 +0100

172 lines

Re: OT advice needed

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jun 2010 13:59:30 +0100

26 lines

Re: OT advice needed

Adrian Midgley (Gmail) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jun 2010 00:08:58 +0100

26 lines

Re: OT advice needed

Chris Salter <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jun 2010 02:36:12 +0100

49 lines

Re: OT advice needed

Jel Coward <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:30:40 -0700

16 lines

New Thread

prophylactic ssri's

prophylactic ssri's

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jun 2010 12:47:18 +0000

58 lines

Re: prophylactic ssri's

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jun 2010 13:59:23 +0100

39 lines

Re: prophylactic ssri's

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jun 2010 14:16:21 +0100

20 lines

Re: prophylactic ssri's

Adrian Midgley (Gmail) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jun 2010 14:22:08 +0100

44 lines

Re: prophylactic ssri's

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jun 2010 14:37:42 +0100

38 lines

Re: prophylactic ssri's

Walter Tim (FALKLAND SURGERY) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jun 2010 14:38:29 +0100

160 lines

Re: prophylactic ssri's

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jun 2010 14:56:07 +0100

34 lines

Re: prophylactic ssri's

Robert Treharne Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jun 2010 14:57:42 +0100

42 lines

Re: prophylactic ssri's

Adrian Midgley (Gmail) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jun 2010 15:19:54 +0100

41 lines

Re: prophylactic ssri's

Walter Tim (FALKLAND SURGERY) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jun 2010 15:29:02 +0100

197 lines

Re: prophylactic ssri's

Adrian Midgley (Gmail) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jun 2010 15:37:38 +0100

21 lines

Re: prophylactic ssri's

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jun 2010 15:44:35 +0100

50 lines

Re: prophylactic ssri's

Piers Longhorn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jun 2010 10:01:53 +0100

171 lines

Re: prophylactic ssri's

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jun 2010 22:14:27 +0100

25 lines

Re: prophylactic ssri's

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jun 2010 22:14:56 +0100

25 lines

Re: prophylactic ssri's

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jun 2010 23:40:08 +0100

35 lines

Re: prophylactic ssri's

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jun 2010 18:43:22 +0000

84 lines

Re: prophylactic ssri's

Adrian Midgley (Gmail) <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jun 2010 22:09:42 +0100

23 lines

Re: prophylactic ssri's

Piers Longhorn <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:22:17 +0100

126 lines

Re: prophylactic ssri's

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:52:48 +0100

60 lines

Re: prophylactic ssri's

John Glasspool <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:53:30 +0100

176 lines

New Thread

prophylactic ssri's; now role of HVs

Re: prophylactic ssri's; now role of HVs

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jun 2010 13:47:58 +0000

148 lines

Re: prophylactic ssri's; now role of HVs

John Glasspool <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jun 2010 16:40:05 +0100

176 lines

Re: prophylactic ssri's; now role of HVs

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jun 2010 22:12:40 +0100

36 lines

New Thread

Protecting Footballers

Protecting Footballers

Sandra Pickering <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Jun 2010 14:09:22 +0100

50 lines

Re: Protecting Footballers

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Jun 2010 15:53:21 +0100

71 lines

Re: Protecting Footballers

Sandra Pickering <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Jun 2010 16:06:46 +0100

103 lines

Re: Protecting Footballers

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Jun 2010 19:46:00 +0100

129 lines

Re: Protecting Footballers

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Jun 2010 22:27:56 +0000

282 lines

New Thread

Research volunteers needed

Research volunteers needed

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Jun 2010 10:17:18 +0000

69 lines

Re: Research volunteers needed

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Jun 2010 13:02:16 +0100

47 lines

New Thread

security for soar

security for soar

Paul Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jun 2010 11:07:27 +0100

31 lines

Re: security for soar

Paul Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jun 2010 11:23:13 +0100

53 lines

Re: security for soar

Walter Tim (FALKLAND SURGERY) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jun 2010 12:09:28 +0100

86 lines

Re: security for soar

John Glasspool <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jun 2010 13:50:37 +0100

210 lines

Re: security for soar

Jel Coward <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jun 2010 07:18:10 -0700

34 lines

Re: security for soar

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jun 2010 17:54:10 +0100

37 lines

Re: security for soar

Paul Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jun 2010 18:34:26 +0100

31 lines

Re: security for soar

Walter Tim (FALKLAND SURGERY) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jun 2010 18:41:52 +0100

61 lines

Re: security for soar

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jun 2010 21:12:18 +0100

49 lines

Re: security for soar

Adrian Midgley (Gmail) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jun 2010 21:33:14 +0100

29 lines

Re: security for soar

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jun 2010 07:15:07 +0100

35 lines

New Thread

Some DoH and NHS IT people should attend this meeting

Some DoH and NHS IT people should attend this meeting

Adrian Midgley (Gmail) <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jun 2010 22:16:05 +0100

42 lines

New Thread

Statin effect on overall death rate

Statin effect on overall death rate

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jun 2010 12:39:27 +0100

20 lines

Re: Statin effect on overall death rate

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jun 2010 13:47:42 +0000

90 lines

Re: Statin effect on overall death rate

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jun 2010 15:41:32 +0100

31 lines

Re: Statin effect on overall death rate

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jun 2010 18:08:54 +0100

32 lines

Re: Statin effect on overall death rate

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jun 2010 18:23:23 +0100

25 lines

Re: Statin effect on overall death rate

Adrian Midgley (Gmail) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jun 2010 20:36:01 +0100

18 lines

Re: Statin effect on overall death rate

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jun 2010 15:47:02 -0400

116 lines

Re: Statin effect on overall death rate

Adrian Midgley (Gmail) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jun 2010 21:00:46 +0100

24 lines

Re: Statin effect on overall death rate

John Glasspool <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jun 2010 07:40:27 +0100

71 lines

Re: Statin effect on overall death rate

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jun 2010 03:33:56 -0400

512 lines

New Thread

The Velluvial Matrix

The Velluvial Matrix

Paul Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jun 2010 19:17:39 +0100

15 lines

Re: The Velluvial Matrix

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jun 2010 21:52:09 +0100

23 lines

Re: The Velluvial Matrix

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:18:15 +0100

36 lines

Re: The Velluvial Matrix

quail <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jun 2010 18:14:26 -0600

19 lines

New Thread

Unbelievable

Unbelievable

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jun 2010 18:44:16 +0100

14 lines

Re: Unbelievable

Adrian Midgley (Gmail) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jun 2010 19:52:45 +0100

33 lines

Re: Unbelievable

Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jun 2010 20:05:52 +0100

24 lines

Re: Unbelievable

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jun 2010 21:56:38 +0100

54 lines

Re: Unbelievable

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jun 2010 22:16:28 +0100

23 lines

Re: Unbelievable

John Glasspool <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jun 2010 19:02:33 +0100

79 lines

New Thread

[vision] Anticoagulation

Re: [vision] Anticoagulation

Markwick Christopher (Medway PCT) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jun 2010 14:12:07 +0100

78 lines

Re: [vision] Anticoagulation

Markwick Christopher (Medway PCT) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jun 2010 14:18:00 +0100

194 lines

Re: [vision] Anticoagulation

Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jun 2010 22:25:57 +0100

21 lines

Re: [vision] Anticoagulation

Robert Treharne Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jun 2010 23:55:51 +0100

36 lines

JISCMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager