JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


May 2010


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

2nd call - INFORMATICS 2010: submissions until 31 May 2010 (1 message)
3rd Annual Data Protection in the Public Sector Conference (1 message)
7 privacy headlines of Clegg's Speech (1 message)
A must watch!! seriously (7 messages)
Adv - RIPA Update Workshop (1 message)
Animals' Right to Privacy (4 messages)
Another example of contacting an opted-out person to make sure they mean it (4 messages)
Audits (3 messages)
BBC news and Stephen Griffiths (4 messages)
Big Brother Watch Report and Law Society Response (1 message)
Body scanner challenge on ridicule principle (3 messages)
Canadian Privacy Breach (3 messages)
Clegg's Speech (1 message)
Complete list of Government actions (2 messages)
Con Lib Alliance (2 messages)
Consultants (1 message)
Data Processing Agreement and Employee Protection Register (1 message)
EU Directive can require consent for behavioural advertising (1 message)
Facebook Privacy (3 messages)
FOI Podcast Number 22 (1 message)
FOI Update web seminar (1 message)
FOI Update Webcast (1 message)
FOI Webcast (1 message)
Function creep (2 messages)
Fw: [data-protection] RIPA story (2 messages)
Fwd: CONF: The Ethics of Privacy and Confidentiality (1 message)
Google has mapped every WiFi network in Britain (1 message)
Google Street View (16 messages)
Google, Microsoft and Yahoo! Do not comply with data protection rules (2 messages)
Hypothetical question (15 messages)
ICO Consultation on the Assessment Notices Code of Practice (1 message)
ICO falls silent? (3 messages)
Information Sharing (1 message)
Insecurity of Security in social responsibility (1 message)
Iris Scans for Driving licences (1 message)
Is your behaviour protected under data protection? Airport security takes a step forward in the UK and the US? (5 messages)
Lib con alliance (1 message)
MH - To all comms data course delegates (1 message)
Million Pound CCTV Camera (1 message)
more animal related data protection issues (3 messages)
New Standard Model Contract Clauses to permit Sub-Processing (1 message)
NINOs - again (4 messages)
Opt-in for using photos or opt-out? (3 messages)
Principle 4 (How far do we go to correct data?) (4 messages)
Queens Speech Today (3 messages)
Releasing examination video (1 message)
RIPA story (5 messages)
Schools and the Student Support Centre (4 messages)
Self explanatory: 1000 data breaches reported to the ICO (1 message)
sickness record available to all staff?? (1 message)
Source needed for anaysis of DPA braches (1 message)
Statistics for FOI requests (5 messages)
The "Grim RIPA" - Local Authorities in the firing line (2 messages)
The Vetting and Barring Scheme (1 message)
Thursday afternoon story (2 messages)
Thursday afternoon story[Scanned] (1 message)
Use of secret evidence (2 messages)
When is unexpected processing allowable? (8 messages)
yet another HMRC cock up (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

2nd call - INFORMATICS 2010: submissions until 31 May 2010

2nd call - INFORMATICS 2010: submissions until 31 May 2010

Joseph Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 May 2010 18:11:38 +0100

168 lines

New Thread

3rd Annual Data Protection in the Public Sector Conference

3rd Annual Data Protection in the Public Sector Conference

Lisa Souza - PDP <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 12:53:36 +0100

63 lines

New Thread

7 privacy headlines of Clegg's Speech

7 privacy headlines of Clegg's Speech

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 13:49:42 +0100

337 lines

New Thread

A must watch!! seriously

A must watch!! seriously

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2010 15:53:50 +0100

228 lines

Re: A must watch!! seriously

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2010 16:08:13 +0100

449 lines

Re: A must watch!! seriously

Peter Mead <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2010 16:45:54 +0100

864 lines

Re: A must watch!! seriously

Kevin Broadfoot <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2010 16:54:52 +0100

34 lines

Re: A must watch!! seriously

Andrew Cormack <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2010 17:08:51 +0100

73 lines

Re: A must watch!! seriously

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2010 17:42:10 +0100

873 lines

Re: A must watch!! seriously

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2010 17:52:33 +0100

617 lines

New Thread

Adv - RIPA Update Workshop

Adv - RIPA Update Workshop

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 09:27:21 +0100

198 lines

New Thread

Animals' Right to Privacy

Animals' Right to Privacy

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 May 2010 13:11:54 +0100

132 lines

Re: Animals' Right to Privacy

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 May 2010 20:31:17 +0100

566 lines

Re: Animals' Right to Privacy

Ward, Ciaran <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2010 08:53:14 +0100

916 lines

Re: Animals' Right to Privacy

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2010 12:07:17 +0100

114 lines

New Thread

Another example of contacting an opted-out person to make sure they mean it

Another example of contacting an opted-out person to make sure they mean it

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2010 20:47:35 +0100

45 lines

Re: Another example of contacting an opted-out person to make sure they mean it

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2010 23:46:54 +0100

89 lines

Re: Another example of contacting an opted-out person to make sure they mean it

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2010 07:28:51 +0100

244 lines

Re: Another example of contacting an opted-out person to make sure they mean it

Joe Sutton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2010 11:30:32 +0100

131 lines

New Thread

Audits

Audits

Giles, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 14:59:55 +0100

354 lines

Re: Audits

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 15:24:50 +0100

478 lines

Re: Audits

Mark van Harmelen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 16:07:29 +0100

594 lines

New Thread

BBC news and Stephen Griffiths

BBC news and Stephen Griffiths

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 18:09:01 +0100

111 lines

BBC news and Stephen Griffiths

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 18:20:43 +0100

111 lines

Re: BBC news and Stephen Griffiths

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 18:35:53 +0100

480 lines

Re: BBC news and Stephen Griffiths

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 18:40:20 +0100

489 lines

New Thread

Big Brother Watch Report and Law Society Response

Big Brother Watch Report and Law Society Response

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 11:47:58 +0100

149 lines

New Thread

Body scanner challenge on ridicule principle

Body scanner challenge on ridicule principle

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 08:35:42 +0100

55 lines

Re: Body scanner challenge on ridicule principle

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2010 13:14:21 +0100

97 lines

Re: Body scanner challenge on ridicule principle

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 May 2010 16:26:03 +0100

35 lines

New Thread

Canadian Privacy Breach

Canadian Privacy Breach

Kevin Broadfoot <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 15:21:30 +0100

38 lines

Re: Canadian Privacy Breach

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 15:36:13 +0100

72 lines

Re: Canadian Privacy Breach

Lee Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 15:41:00 +0100

82 lines

New Thread

Clegg's Speech

Clegg's Speech

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 12:54:18 +0100

129 lines

New Thread

Complete list of Government actions

Complete list of Government actions

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2010 16:32:57 +0100

372 lines

Re: Complete list of Government actions

Paula Tighe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2010 18:15:11 +0100

735 lines

New Thread

Con Lib Alliance

Con Lib Alliance

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2010 15:27:02 +0100

190 lines

Re: Con Lib Alliance

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2010 13:17:00 +0100

90 lines

New Thread

Consultants

Consultants

Lisa Percival <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 May 2010 14:48:34 +0100

47 lines

New Thread

Data Processing Agreement and Employee Protection Register

Data Processing Agreement and Employee Protection Register

Cotterill, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2010 10:59:01 +0100

218 lines

New Thread

EU Directive can require consent for behavioural advertising

EU Directive can require consent for behavioural advertising

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2010 11:56:24 +0100

337 lines

New Thread

Facebook Privacy

Facebook Privacy

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2010 15:19:12 +0100

130 lines

Re: Facebook Privacy

Mark van Harmelen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 May 2010 10:48:38 +0100

245 lines

Facebook Privacy

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 14:22:00 +0100

124 lines

New Thread

FOI Podcast Number 22

FOI Podcast Number 22

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 10:21:18 +0100

166 lines

New Thread

FOI Update web seminar

FOI Update web seminar

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2010 09:03:13 +0100

321 lines

New Thread

FOI Update Webcast

FOI Update Webcast

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 08:10:30 +0100

217 lines

New Thread

FOI Webcast

FOI Webcast

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 16:39:43 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

Function creep

Function creep

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2010 11:27:23 +0100

33 lines

Re: Function creep

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 May 2010 16:23:03 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

Fw: [data-protection] RIPA story

Fw: [data-protection] RIPA story

David Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 09:56:37 +0100

187 lines

Re: Fw: [data-protection] RIPA story

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 10:17:54 +0100

234 lines

New Thread

Fwd: CONF: The Ethics of Privacy and Confidentiality

Fwd: CONF: The Ethics of Privacy and Confidentiality

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 16:11:47 +0100

133 lines

New Thread

Google has mapped every WiFi network in Britain

Google has mapped every WiFi network in Britain

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 May 2010 23:57:34 +0100

326 lines

New Thread

Google Street View

Google Street View

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 May 2010 08:47:17 +0100

133 lines

Re: Google Street View

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 May 2010 10:58:35 +0100

41 lines

Re: Google Street View

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 May 2010 11:09:13 +0100

214 lines

Re: Google Street View

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 May 2010 11:56:23 +0100

362 lines

Re: Google Street View

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 May 2010 22:11:02 +0100

47 lines

Re: Google Street View

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 May 2010 22:38:19 +0100

215 lines

Re: Google Street View

Robert (Bob) Waixel <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 May 2010 23:03:04 +0100

188 lines

Google Street View

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 May 2010 07:27:36 +0100

253 lines

Re: Google Street View

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 May 2010 10:07:46 +0100

253 lines

Re: Google Street View

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 May 2010 08:32:04 +0100

40 lines

Re: Google Street View

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 May 2010 11:40:37 +0100

86 lines

Re: Google Street View

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 May 2010 11:42:26 +0100

464 lines

Re: Google Street View

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 May 2010 11:46:14 +0100

174 lines

Re: Google Street View

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 May 2010 06:54:45 -0400

175 lines

Re: Google Street View

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 May 2010 12:49:41 +0100

230 lines

Re: Google Street View

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 May 2010 12:53:44 +0100

304 lines

New Thread

Google, Microsoft and Yahoo! Do not comply with data protection rules

Google, Microsoft and Yahoo! Do not comply with data protection rules

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 23:30:24 +0100

259 lines

Re: Google, Microsoft and Yahoo! Do not comply with data protection rules

Andrew Cormack <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 09:14:27 +0100

149 lines

New Thread

Hypothetical question

Hypothetical question

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 09:22:34 +0100

31 lines

Re: Hypothetical question

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 04:35:32 -0400

90 lines

Re: Hypothetical question

Lee Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 09:36:49 +0100

78 lines

Re: Hypothetical question

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 09:44:42 +0100

87 lines

Re: Hypothetical question

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 09:45:23 +0100

113 lines

Re: Hypothetical question

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 04:50:30 -0400

180 lines

Re: Hypothetical question

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 10:06:51 +0100

217 lines

Re: Hypothetical question

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 10:03:12 +0100

217 lines

Re: Hypothetical question

Giles, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 10:32:14 +0100

499 lines

Re: Hypothetical question

Sneddon, James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 10:38:42 +0100

797 lines

Re: Hypothetical question

James Walkom <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 10:41:45 +0100

556 lines

Re: Hypothetical question

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 11:02:00 +0100

763 lines

Re: Hypothetical question

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 11:31:44 +0100

395 lines

Re: Hypothetical question

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 11:34:32 +0100

447 lines

Re: Hypothetical question

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 11:43:10 +0100

425 lines

New Thread

ICO Consultation on the Assessment Notices Code of Practice

Re: ICO Consultation on the Assessment Notices Code of Practice

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2010 14:06:39 +0100

380 lines

New Thread

ICO falls silent?

Re: ICO falls silent?

J.S.M.Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 May 2010 10:08:42 +0100

66 lines

Re: ICO falls silent?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 May 2010 10:37:25 +0100

124 lines

Re: ICO falls silent?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 May 2010 10:54:41 +0100

179 lines

New Thread

Information Sharing

Information Sharing

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 09:09:39 +0100

134 lines

New Thread

Insecurity of Security in social responsibility

Insecurity of Security in social responsibility

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 11:23:43 +0100

30 lines

New Thread

Iris Scans for Driving licences

Iris Scans for Driving licences

Chris Spray <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 23:12:37 +0100

215 lines

New Thread

Is your behaviour protected under data protection? Airport security takes a step forward in the UK and the US?

Is your behaviour protected under data protection? Airport security takes a step forward in the UK and the US?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 16:10:22 +0100

263 lines

Re: Is your behaviour protected under data protection? Airport security takes a step forward in the UK and the US?

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 16:44:27 +0100

143 lines

Re: Is your behaviour protected under data protection? Airport security takes a step forward in the UK and the US?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 16:54:23 +0100

223 lines

Re: Is your behaviour protected under data protection? Airport security takes a step forward in the UK and the US?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 17:27:53 +0100

398 lines

Re: Is your behaviour protected under data protection? Airport security takes a step forward in the UK and the US?

Mark Beattie <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2010 09:12:02 +0100

38 lines

New Thread

Lib con alliance

Lib con alliance

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2010 17:42:48 +0100

307 lines

New Thread

MH - To all comms data course delegates

MH - To all comms data course delegates

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 17:44:43 +0100

181 lines

New Thread

Million Pound CCTV Camera

Million Pound CCTV Camera

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2010 14:18:32 +0100

121 lines

New Thread

more animal related data protection issues

more animal related data protection issues

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 04:40:32 -0400

179 lines

Re: more animal related data protection issues

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 10:21:15 +0100

617 lines

Re: more animal related data protection issues

Lynn Wyeth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 10:53:35 +0100

64 lines

New Thread

New Standard Model Contract Clauses to permit Sub-Processing

New Standard Model Contract Clauses to permit Sub-Processing

Clare Watts <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 09:56:52 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

NINOs - again

NINOs - again

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 12:24:20 +0100

272 lines

Re: NINOs - again

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 12:38:41 +0100

728 lines

Re: NINOs - again

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 13:24:29 +0100

518 lines

Re: NINOs - again

Giles, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 13:52:41 +0100

730 lines

New Thread

Opt-in for using photos or opt-out?

Opt-in for using photos or opt-out?

Terry Stevens <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 15:56:49 +0100

49 lines

Re: Opt-in for using photos or opt-out?

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 09:12:27 +0100

86 lines

Re: Opt-in for using photos or opt-out?

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 10:01:51 +0100

127 lines

New Thread

Principle 4 (How far do we go to correct data?)

Principle 4 (How far do we go to correct data?)

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 14:10:04 +0100

482 lines

Re: Principle 4 (How far do we go to correct data?)

Matt Morrison <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 14:33:59 +0100

282 lines

Re: Principle 4 (How far do we go to correct data?)

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 14:35:11 +0100

533 lines

Re: Principle 4 (How far do we go to correct data?)

David Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 14:41:31 +0100

245 lines

New Thread

Queens Speech Today

Queens Speech Today

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 19:06:43 +0100

153 lines

Re: Queens Speech Today

Mark van Harmelen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 22:06:51 +0100

323 lines

Re: Queens Speech Today

J.S.M.Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 10:25:31 +0100

898 lines

New Thread

Releasing examination video

Releasing examination video

Rebecca Messenger <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2010 11:29:03 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

RIPA story

RIPA story

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 10:43:57 +0100

59 lines

RIPA story

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 11:35:18 +0100

40 lines

Re: RIPA story

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 21:25:32 +0100

50 lines

Re: RIPA story

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 09:32:03 +0100

96 lines

Re: RIPA story

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 12:58:18 +0100

52 lines

New Thread

Schools and the Student Support Centre

Schools and the Student Support Centre

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 10:50:23 +0100

72 lines

Re: Schools and the Student Support Centre

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 11:40:02 +0100

104 lines

Re: Schools and the Student Support Centre

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 12:28:47 +0100

240 lines

Re: Schools and the Student Support Centre

Chris Spray <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 18:42:42 +0100

147 lines

New Thread

Self explanatory: 1000 data breaches reported to the ICO

Self explanatory: 1000 data breaches reported to the ICO

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2010 10:59:29 +0100

697 lines

New Thread

sickness record available to all staff??

sickness record available to all staff??

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 10:17:23 +0100

52 lines

New Thread

Source needed for anaysis of DPA braches

Source needed for anaysis of DPA braches

Tony Brookes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2010 13:40:11 +0100

197 lines

New Thread

Statistics for FOI requests

Statistics for FOI requests

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2010 07:27:15 +0100

50 lines

Re: Statistics for FOI requests

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2010 09:59:25 +0100

135 lines

Re: Statistics for FOI requests

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2010 19:27:28 +0100

179 lines

Re: Statistics for FOI requests

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2010 08:37:42 +0100

235 lines

Re: Statistics for FOI requests

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2010 12:02:17 +0100

290 lines

New Thread

The "Grim RIPA" - Local Authorities in the firing line

The "Grim RIPA" - Local Authorities in the firing line

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 18:05:20 +0100

305 lines

Re: The "Grim RIPA" - Local Authorities in the firing line

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 22:59:12 +0100

68 lines

New Thread

The Vetting and Barring Scheme

The Vetting and Barring Scheme

Lynn Wyeth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2010 09:55:18 +0100

53 lines

New Thread

Thursday afternoon story

Thursday afternoon story

Paul Simpkins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 17:04:50 +0100

173 lines

Re: Thursday afternoon story

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 17:30:03 +0100

275 lines

New Thread

Thursday afternoon story[Scanned]

Re: Thursday afternoon story[Scanned]

Ronan Durnin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 17:30:35 +0100

448 lines

New Thread

Use of secret evidence

Use of secret evidence

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2010 19:20:00 +0100

135 lines

Use of secret evidence

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 17:45:14 +0100

83 lines

New Thread

When is unexpected processing allowable?

When is unexpected processing allowable?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 12:16:08 +0100

203 lines

Re: When is unexpected processing allowable?

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 12:37:22 +0100

346 lines

Re: When is unexpected processing allowable?

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 08:03:40 -0400

541 lines

Re: When is unexpected processing allowable?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 14:42:41 +0100

683 lines

Re: When is unexpected processing allowable?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 14:44:22 +0100

422 lines

Re: When is unexpected processing allowable?

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 09:58:48 -0400

942 lines

Re: When is unexpected processing allowable?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 19:23:29 +0100

372 lines

Re: When is unexpected processing allowable?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 20:58:15 +0100

172 lines

New Thread

yet another HMRC cock up

yet another HMRC cock up

C Oppenheim <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 16:58:53 +0100

29 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager