JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for POETRYETC Archives


POETRYETC Archives

POETRYETC Archives


May 2010


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"forgetable" (7 messages)
"Growing up Misfit" audio (4 messages)
"Hasty Orison" (1 message)
"Poetry for the Nervous, Vol 1" (6 messages)
"The Theory of the Avant-Garde and Practice" by Libbie Rifkin at The Argotist Online (3 messages)
"wow" (11 messages)
'Lou Reed's "Street Hassle" and the Challenge to Post-Modern Poetry' by Adam Fieled at The Argotist Online (1 message)
'wow' (4 messages)
... it is a moderated list (8 messages)
2 (1 message)
2008 (5 messages)
3 more. May or may not have jumpcuts. (1 message)
4 (1 message)
<No subject> (10 messages)
A man with a mission (8 messages)
a reminder from our list service provider (36 messages)
Adventurous rejected: M> "Jump-cut" seems to me an exceptionally aptagma Blog (4 messages)
Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog (44 messages)
ah, the future of the arts etc (3 messages)
ALAN HANCOCK at Perth Poetry Club this Sat 8 May (1 message)
Almighty Ever-Watching Capricious Force (1 message)
An Appeal to Robin Hamilton (5 messages)
An overlooked early concession by Robin (1 message)
analog (9 messages)
another new media arts article (1 message)
Argotist Ebooks' first publication: "Scratching Face" by Jake Berry (1 message)
asperger, high inteligence, freaks (9 messages)
Aust discourse analysis (3 messages)
Australian rules? (2 messages)
Automated Reply Re: "POETRYETC Digest - 10 May 2010 to 11 May 2010 (#2010-131)" (1 message)
Automated Reply Re: "POETRYETC Digest - 13 May 2010 to 14 May 2010 (#2010-134)" (3 messages)
Automated Reply Re: "POETRYETC Digest - 30 Apr 2010 to 1 May 2010 (#2010-121)" (1 message)
Automated Reply Re: "POETRYETC Digest - 4 May 2010 to 5 May 2010 (#2010-125)" (1 message)
Automated Reply Re: "POETRYETC Digest - 6 May 2010 to 7 May 2010 (#2010-127)" (8 messages)
back again (2 messages)
Ballot bull (1 message)
Beach Snap (6 messages)
BlazeVOX 2kX Spring 2010 now online :-) (1 message)
blog (3 messages)
Boo-to-Coos, Cat-calls-and-Coups (16 messages)
Call for work at Poets for Living Waters - – “Gulf Coast Poems” (1 message)
Catbird Snap (7 messages)
CleggLit (1 message)
confused again (3 messages)
Crap (40 messages)
Crap and a defence of my poetics (4 messages)
Cricket poem prize details (12 messages)
cricket poetry prize (3 messages)
cuckoo (2 messages)
Decline and Fall (28 messages)
Deleuze and poetry (1 message)
Desmond ... (9 messages)
disability politics update (5 messages)
discontinuity (1 message)
DOES POETRY EXIST WITHOUT THE EGO? (16 messages)
Ekphrasis Snapped (3 messages)
electronic colour (4 messages)
experimental canadian writer (4 messages)
From Jump-Cut to This (3 messages)
From the local paper - attention dog lovers (4 messages)
Fwd: "LOST" on Manhattan's Upper East Side + $145,000 in Literary Prizes... (1 message)
Fwd: "Poetry for the Nervous, Vol 1" (3 messages)
Fwd: Re: FW: hello and goodbye (1 message)
Fwd: Snap The Void (1 message)
Fwd: Tarkovsky (1 message)
Geddes (to be clear) (3 messages)
getting back to the Waste Land, sort of (2 messages)
Harumph, in Churchillian Tones, "A Time of Change .." (30 messages)
hello and goodbye (8 messages)
how fascism comes to be (6 messages)
I have joined the Scialist Alliance. (1 message)
Interview announcement (2 messages)
Interview with Prof of Poetry candidate Stephen Moss (3 messages)
iphone media art (1 message)
Krapp's Last Tape (7 messages)
Leaving for a bit (3 messages)
Lennon Poetry Competition (5 messages)
Lest We Forget (5 messages)
Let me put this another way (18 messages)
list moderation (16 messages)
London Reading 22 June 2010 (2 messages)
Mapplethorpe (4 messages)
Mardi May + Scrutineer of Splodge at Perth Poetry Club this Sat 15 May (1 message)
Mark Weiss and Cuba in Leicester (3 messages)
mirrorsnap (sort of) 26 V 10 (4 messages)
moderation in all things (2 messages)
My Jump-Cut Poem (13 messages)
New issue of Versification (66 messages)
New life: pup snap series (4 messages)
new photography (1 message)
Next door 22 (6 messages)
Next door 23 (1 message)
Next door 23 - properly or better punctuated, sorry (5 messages)
Next door 24 (1 message)
Next door 25 (3 messages)
Next door 26 The trouble (4 messages)
Next door 27 An entertainment (1 message)
Next door 28 Aliens (1 message)
Next door 29 (1 message)
Next door 30 (5 messages)
Next door 31 (3 messages)
Next door 32 (3 messages)
next door 33 (1 message)
Next door 34 (1 message)
Next door 34 & 35 (2 messages)
Next door 35 (1 message)
nexus (4 messages)
non-digital (1 message)
not quite a snap (4 messages)
Not the J words ... (2 messages)
Notice from Catherine M. Bennett (1 message)
Notice: Mudlark (1 message)
Orpheus in Grimsby (1 message)
Pas de deux in Panama (1 message)
pat snap )¬`¬`¬`¬) Wednesday, 19 May 2010 (4 messages)
pat snap *^"^"^"^*Wednesday, 12 May 2010 (4 messages)
pat snap *_^_^_^_* Wednesday, May 26, 2010 Re: possible offenses that result in banning? (1 message)
pat snap 2 (*_^_^_^_*) Wednesday, May 26, 2010 for lawrence upton (3 messages)
pat snap =+=+=+=Wednesday, 05 May 2010 (7 messages)
Performance versus Poetry (34 messages)
Perth Poetry Club: Molly Hall Sat 29 May. + Jun, Jul, Aug lineups (1 message)
poem in Singapore magazine (1 message)
Polari (1 message)
Policies & Procedures (14 messages)
possible offenses that result in banning? (24 messages)
Raymond Grenfell + Stewart Hunt at Perth Poetry Club this Sat 22 May (1 message)
Reading Habits (4 messages)
Rev. "Obolus" - last 4 lines better (1 message)
RIP Judson Crews (1917-2010) (2 messages)
Scenes from Literary Life (3 messages)
Self portrait with Bacon and Velasquez (6 messages)
Sexist rhetoric & women & Mercury retrograde (13 messages)
Sexist rhetoric and women (65 messages)
Shappi Khorsandi Untitled (1 message)
Shearsman Book Launch and Reading, May 21st (1 message)
snap 12 V 10 (3 messages)
Snap That Stranger (5 messages)
Snap The Void (1 message)
snap: a dream (4 messages)
snap: out of it (2 messages)
snap: remembering (3 messages)
snap: remembering / dog gone (1 message)
Spielberg to direct War Horse (5 messages)
sydney's siberia and other creatures (1 message)
taking a break from here (5 messages)
Tarkovsky (13 messages)
Thalweg (3 messages)
the Archives (2 messages)
The Jump-Cut (4 messages)
The Jump-Cut in Poetry (80 messages)
The Jump-Cut in Poetry -- Dictionary meets Dictionary (3 messages)
The Jump-Cut in Poetry -- Katz and Godard (2 messages)
The Jump-Cut in Poetry -- revisited (14 messages)
This IS boasting (12 messages)
this is NOT a moderated list (2 messages)
This year's publications (1 message)
Tramadol (8 messages)
Two reviews in for "Cyclones in High Northern Latitudes" (1 message)
UTP Journals Focus - Free articles for the week of May 5 - 11, 2010 (1 message)
Wargame? (46 messages)
will the real patrick mcmanus declare himself?! (9 messages)
Williams 'Wait' (2 messages)
Wimbeloo (44 messages)
Wimbledon poetry (66 messages)
wimp as homophobic discourse (for Roniin) (8 messages)
wimp as homophobic discourse (for Roniin)...OOPS (1 message)
Word attacks: abstract or personal (27 messages)
writing poetry (31 messages)
[Fwd: Re: Next door 22] (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

POETRYETC Home

POETRYETC Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"forgetable"

"forgetable"

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2010 22:48:14 +0100

28 lines

Re: "forgetable"

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 May 2010 18:26:45 +0100

48 lines

Re: "forgetable"

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 May 2010 19:46:20 +0100

57 lines

Re: "forgetable"

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 May 2010 14:28:47 -0500

69 lines

Re: "forgetable"

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 May 2010 21:09:31 +0100

80 lines

Re: "forgetable"

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 May 2010 22:04:42 +0100

128 lines

Re: "forgetable"

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 May 2010 07:36:41 +0100

163 lines

New Thread

"Growing up Misfit" audio

"Growing up Misfit" audio

Uche Ogbuji <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 07:15:07 -0600

25 lines

Re: "Growing up Misfit" audio

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 11:25:40 -0400

55 lines

Re: "Growing up Misfit" audio

Uche Ogbuji <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 10:04:38 -0600

69 lines

Re: "Growing up Misfit" audio

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 12:41:21 -0400

114 lines

New Thread

"Hasty Orison"

"Hasty Orison"

Frederick Pollack <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 11:04:05 -0400

68 lines

New Thread

"Poetry for the Nervous, Vol 1"

"Poetry for the Nervous, Vol 1"

Uche Ogbuji <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 May 2010 12:39:41 -0600

36 lines

Re: "Poetry for the Nervous, Vol 1"

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 May 2010 09:21:27 +0800

59 lines

Re: "Poetry for the Nervous, Vol 1"

Uche Ogbuji <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 May 2010 09:09:52 -0600

31 lines

Re: "Poetry for the Nervous, Vol 1"

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 May 2010 10:21:50 -0500

63 lines

Re: "Poetry for the Nervous, Vol 1"

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 10:46:01 -0600

43 lines

Re: "Poetry for the Nervous, Vol 1"

bobbi lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 22:08:33 -0600

53 lines

New Thread

"The Theory of the Avant-Garde and Practice" by Libbie Rifkin at The Argotist Online

"The Theory of the Avant-Garde and Practice" by Libbie Rifkin at The Argotist Online

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2010 18:56:54 +0200

30 lines

Re: "The Theory of the Avant-Garde and Practice" by Libbie Rifkin at The Argotist Online

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2010 19:31:18 +0100

23 lines

Re: "The Theory of the Avant-Garde and Practice" by Libbie Rifkin at The Argotist Online

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2010 22:04:11 +0100

25 lines

New Thread

"wow"

"wow"

Frederick Pollack <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2010 12:07:28 -0400

185 lines

Re: "wow"

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2010 18:53:16 +0100

208 lines

Re: "wow"

Angel Robert Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2010 10:58:59 -0700

188 lines

Re: "wow"

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2010 19:15:23 +0100

27 lines

Re: "wow"

Desmond Swords <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2010 20:14:39 +0100

23 lines

Re: "wow"

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2010 22:48:02 +0300

195 lines

Re: "wow"

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2010 20:48:08 +0100

49 lines

Re: "wow"

Frederick Pollack <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2010 16:56:46 -0400

35 lines

Re: "wow"

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2010 22:12:24 +0100

33 lines

Re: "wow"

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2010 22:32:02 +0100

36 lines

Re: "wow"

Desmond Swords <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 May 2010 03:24:06 +0100

22 lines

New Thread

'Lou Reed's "Street Hassle" and the Challenge to Post-Modern Poetry' by Adam Fieled at The Argotist Online

'Lou Reed's "Street Hassle" and the Challenge to Post-Modern Poetry' by Adam Fieled at The Argotist Online

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 May 2010 14:37:12 +0200

16 lines

New Thread

'wow'

Re: 'wow'

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2010 19:03:52 +0100

251 lines

Re: 'wow'

Angel Robert Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2010 11:08:19 -0700

267 lines

Re: 'wow'

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2010 19:22:06 +0100

333 lines

Re: 'wow'

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2010 19:33:31 +0100

54 lines

New Thread

... it is a moderated list

... it is a moderated list

sharon brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 10:55:34 -0600

101 lines

Re: ... it is a moderated list

Kenneth Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 14:29:42 -0400

49 lines

Re: ... it is a moderated list

Desmond Swords <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 19:51:48 +0100

59 lines

Re: ... it is a moderated list

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 15:02:14 -0400

76 lines

Re: ... it is a moderated list

Desmond Swords <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 20:10:09 +0100

27 lines

Re: ... it is a moderated list

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 14:09:27 -0600

48 lines

Re: ... it is a moderated list

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 16:43:32 +0100

19 lines

Re: ... it is a moderated list

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 17:16:50 +0100

22 lines

New Thread

2

2

Frederick Pollack <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 May 2010 23:29:07 -0400

119 lines

New Thread

2008

2008

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 May 2010 21:02:41 +1000

19 lines

Re: 2008

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 May 2010 12:04:53 +0100

38 lines

Re: 2008

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 May 2010 17:56:14 +0100

54 lines

Re: 2008

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 May 2010 09:43:57 +1000

65 lines

Re: 2008

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 May 2010 11:07:04 +1000

35 lines

New Thread

3 more. May or may not have jumpcuts.

3 more. May or may not have jumpcuts.

Frederick Pollack <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 19:34:30 -0400

116 lines

New Thread

4

4

Frederick Pollack <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 May 2010 18:24:19 -0400

194 lines

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2010 11:06:10 +0100

47 lines

<No subject>

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2010 16:20:29 +0100

62 lines

<No subject>

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2010 10:05:33 -0600

77 lines

<No subject>

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2010 09:20:02 +0100

111 lines

<No subject>

Frederick Pollack <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 May 2010 23:54:58 -0400

55 lines

<No subject>

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 May 2010 11:59:32 +0800

72 lines

<No subject>

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 May 2010 06:40:31 +0100

89 lines

<No subject>

Frederick Pollack <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 May 2010 12:31:28 -0400

81 lines

<No subject>

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 09:16:28 -0600

120 lines

<No subject>

Kim Charnley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 11:16:40 +0100

27 lines

New Thread

A man with a mission

A man with a mission

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2010 09:45:00 +1000

19 lines

Re: A man with a mission

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2010 01:38:51 +0100

48 lines

Re: A man with a mission

Uche Ogbuji <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2010 19:33:38 -0600

49 lines

Re: A man with a mission

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2010 12:02:53 +1000

72 lines

Re: A man with a mission

Uche Ogbuji <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2010 20:12:15 -0600

27 lines

Re: A man with a mission

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2010 12:29:28 +0100

40 lines

Re: A man with a mission

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2010 14:31:55 +0100

200 lines

Re: A man with a mission

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2010 08:31:23 -0600

39 lines

New Thread

a reminder from our list service provider

a reminder from our list service provider

sharon brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 14:55:51 -0600

62 lines

Re: a reminder from our list service provider

Bob Grumman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 18:01:26 -0500

34 lines

Re: a reminder from our list service provider

sharon brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 16:10:44 -0600

34 lines

Re: a reminder from our list service provider

Roger Collett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 23:40:49 +0100

37 lines

Re: a reminder from our list service provider

Desmond Swords <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 00:04:24 +0100

90 lines

Re: a reminder from our list service provider

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 09:05:53 +1000

56 lines

Re: a reminder from our list service provider

Roger Collett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 00:30:18 +0100

120 lines

Re: a reminder from our list service provider

Roger Collett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 00:38:36 +0100

82 lines

Re: a reminder from our list service provider

sharon brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 17:31:48 -0600

24 lines

Re: a reminder from our list service provider

Desmond Swords <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 00:54:40 +0100

29 lines

Re: a reminder from our list service provider

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 01:00:45 +0100

71 lines

Re: a reminder from our list service provider

sharon brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 17:56:31 -0600

20 lines

Re: a reminder from our list service provider

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 10:07:42 +1000

120 lines

Re: a reminder from our list service provider

Roger Collett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 01:15:13 +0100

131 lines

Re: a reminder from our list service provider

Bob Grumman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 20:31:29 -0500

50 lines

Re: a reminder from our list service provider

Millicent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 20:36:29 -0400

28 lines

Re: a reminder from our list service provider

Bob Grumman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 20:45:37 -0500

55 lines

Re: a reminder from our list service provider

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 10:49:33 +1000

44 lines

Re: a reminder from our list service provider

sharon brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 19:10:02 -0600

60 lines

Re: a reminder from our list service provider

sharon brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 19:12:38 -0600

28 lines

Re: a reminder from our list service provider

Bob Grumman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 21:34:44 -0500

45 lines

Re: a reminder from our list service provider

Bob Grumman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 21:36:00 -0500

18 lines

Re: a reminder from our list service provider

Bob Grumman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 21:38:26 -0500

37 lines

Re: a reminder from our list service provider

sharon brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 19:39:03 -0600

34 lines

Re: a reminder from our list service provider

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 08:54:10 -0600

58 lines

Re: a reminder from our list service provider

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 09:14:09 -0600

65 lines

Re: a reminder from our list service provider

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 12:31:33 +1000

25 lines

Re: a reminder from our list service provider

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 17:00:20 +0100

58 lines

Re: a reminder from our list service provider

nieuwland jeroen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 09:31:27 -0700

42 lines

Re: a reminder from our list service provider

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 17:50:15 +0100

117 lines

Re: a reminder from our list service provider

nieuwland jeroen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 10:22:50 -0700

67 lines

Re: a reminder from our list service provider

Roger Collett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 20:18:38 +0100

24 lines

Re: a reminder from our list service provider

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 20:36:35 +0100

35 lines

Re: a reminder from our list service provider

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 20:41:25 +0100

18 lines

Re: a reminder from our list service provider

Roger Collett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 20:48:09 +0100

48 lines

Re: a reminder from our list service provider

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 21:42:45 +0100

54 lines

New Thread

Adventurous rejected: M> "Jump-cut" seems to me an exceptionally aptagma Blog

Re: Adventurous rejected: M> "Jump-cut" seems to me an exceptionally aptagma Blog

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 May 2010 03:12:48 +0100

28 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: M> "Jump-cut" seems to me an exceptionally aptagma Blog

Bob Grumman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 May 2010 22:27:21 -0500

18 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: M> "Jump-cut" seems to me an exceptionally aptagma Blog

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 May 2010 09:08:46 +0100

45 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: M> "Jump-cut" seems to me an exceptionally aptagma Blog

Bob Grumman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 May 2010 07:07:50 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 May 2010 12:07:19 +0100

83 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 May 2010 01:39:41 +1000

97 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 May 2010 17:01:11 +0100

151 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 May 2010 09:20:12 -0700

125 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 May 2010 17:32:11 +0100

42 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 May 2010 02:39:10 +1000

48 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 May 2010 17:41:46 +0100

29 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 May 2010 02:47:45 +1000

46 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 May 2010 18:00:39 +0100

31 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 May 2010 18:04:47 +0100

19 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 May 2010 20:02:16 +0100

109 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

Catherine Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 May 2010 12:19:54 -0700

23 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

Bob Grumman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 May 2010 15:49:12 -0500

19 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

Bob Grumman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 May 2010 15:56:25 -0500

29 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 May 2010 14:10:01 -0700

107 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 May 2010 08:37:00 +1000

130 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 May 2010 17:31:20 -0700

163 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 May 2010 10:34:57 +1000

47 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 May 2010 10:42:05 +1000

43 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 May 2010 18:03:36 -0700

59 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

Bob Grumman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 May 2010 21:29:39 -0500

18 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 May 2010 11:44:21 +1000

46 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 May 2010 02:45:17 +0100

80 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

Bob Grumman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 May 2010 22:06:10 -0500

40 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

John Herbert Cunningham <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 May 2010 22:12:31 -0500

92 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 May 2010 15:46:11 +0100

43 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 May 2010 15:52:46 +0100

35 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 May 2010 16:02:43 +0100

38 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 May 2010 10:05:07 -0500

69 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 May 2010 16:05:19 +0100

23 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 May 2010 16:08:37 +0100

23 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

John Herbert Cunningham <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 May 2010 10:14:09 -0500

50 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 May 2010 16:15:46 +0100

32 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 May 2010 16:25:23 +0100

20 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 May 2010 16:29:56 +0100

24 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 May 2010 16:32:10 +0100

16 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 May 2010 16:38:09 +0100

16 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 May 2010 16:42:10 +0100

24 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 May 2010 17:15:45 +0100

48 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 May 2010 17:21:38 +0100

23 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

Bob Grumman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 May 2010 12:39:26 -0500

16 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

Bob Grumman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 May 2010 12:41:19 -0500

21 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 May 2010 11:16:02 -0600

43 lines

Re: Adventurous rejected: Magma Blog

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 May 2010 19:46:01 +0100

31 lines

New Thread

ah, the future of the arts etc

ah, the future of the arts etc

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2010 09:23:55 -0600

37 lines

Re: ah, the future of the arts etc

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2010 17:47:34 +0100

54 lines

Re: ah, the future of the arts etc

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 11:05:09 +1000

23 lines

New Thread

ALAN HANCOCK at Perth Poetry Club this Sat 8 May

ALAN HANCOCK at Perth Poetry Club this Sat 8 May

Janet Jackson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 00:38:39 +0800

104 lines

New Thread

Almighty Ever-Watching Capricious Force

Almighty Ever-Watching Capricious Force

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 08:00:46 +0100

22 lines

New Thread

An Appeal to Robin Hamilton

An Appeal to Robin Hamilton

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 16:41:45 +0100

38 lines

Re: An Appeal to Robin Hamilton

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 17:52:37 +0100

146 lines

Re: An Appeal to Robin Hamilton

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 23:07:59 +0100

280 lines

Re: An Appeal to Robin Hamilton

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 01:11:00 +0100

194 lines

Re: An Appeal to Robin Hamilton

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 13:41:00 +0100

200 lines

New Thread

An overlooked early concession by Robin

An overlooked early concession by Robin

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 16:00:10 +0100

62 lines

New Thread

analog

analog

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2010 20:37:53 +1000

21 lines

Re: analog

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2010 08:22:44 -0600

57 lines

Re: analog

Ken Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2010 12:11:59 -0400

43 lines

Re: analog

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 10:30:38 +1000

42 lines

Re: analog

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 10:42:11 +1000

29 lines

Re: analog

Ken Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2010 22:14:20 -0400

51 lines

Re: analog

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 14:04:45 +1000

43 lines

Re: analog

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 15:53:13 +1000

19 lines

Re: analog

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 11:48:49 -0600

44 lines

New Thread

another new media arts article

another new media arts article

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 May 2010 20:58:51 +1000

22 lines

New Thread

Argotist Ebooks' first publication: "Scratching Face" by Jake Berry

Argotist Ebooks' first publication: "Scratching Face" by Jake Berry

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 May 2010 16:09:53 +0200

18 lines

New Thread

asperger, high inteligence, freaks

asperger, high inteligence, freaks

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 May 2010 23:30:41 +1000

46 lines

Re: asperger, high inteligence, freaks

bobbi lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 May 2010 14:57:06 -0600

85 lines

Re: asperger, high inteligence, freaks

Frederick Pollack <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 May 2010 17:17:58 -0400

108 lines

Re: asperger, high inteligence, freaks

bobbi lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 May 2010 15:39:39 -0600

116 lines

Re: asperger, high inteligence, freaks

Kenneth Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 May 2010 17:51:43 -0400

50 lines

Re: asperger, high inteligence, freaks

Desmond Swords <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 May 2010 23:10:19 +0100

44 lines

Re: asperger, high inteligence, freaks

bobbi lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 May 2010 16:28:39 -0600

53 lines

Re: asperger, high inteligence, freaks

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 May 2010 10:42:26 +1000

33 lines

Re: asperger, high inteligence, freaks

bobbi lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 May 2010 20:30:40 -0600

55 lines

New Thread

Aust discourse analysis

Re: Aust discourse analysis

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 May 2010 20:40:07 +1000

52 lines

Re: Aust discourse analysis

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 May 2010 20:59:46 +1000

27 lines

Re: Aust discourse analysis

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 May 2010 15:20:17 +0100

74 lines

New Thread

Australian rules?

Australian rules?

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 10:27:21 -0600

37 lines

Re: Australian rules?

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2010 09:19:00 +1000

53 lines

New Thread

Automated Reply Re: "POETRYETC Digest - 10 May 2010 to 11 May 2010 (#2010-131)"

Automated Reply Re: "POETRYETC Digest - 10 May 2010 to 11 May 2010 (#2010-131)"

Tom Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2010 00:12:21 +0100

28 lines

New Thread

Automated Reply Re: "POETRYETC Digest - 13 May 2010 to 14 May 2010 (#2010-134)"

Automated Reply Re: "POETRYETC Digest - 13 May 2010 to 14 May 2010 (#2010-134)"

Tom Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 May 2010 00:12:54 +0100

28 lines

Re: Automated Reply Re: "POETRYETC Digest - 13 May 2010 to 14 May 2010 (#2010-134)"

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 May 2010 09:30:22 +0100

48 lines

Re: Automated Reply Re: "POETRYETC Digest - 13 May 2010 to 14 May 2010 (#2010-134)"

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 May 2010 04:58:20 -0400

74 lines

New Thread

Automated Reply Re: "POETRYETC Digest - 30 Apr 2010 to 1 May 2010 (#2010-121)"

Automated Reply Re: "POETRYETC Digest - 30 Apr 2010 to 1 May 2010 (#2010-121)"

Tom Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 May 2010 00:03:10 +0100

28 lines

New Thread

Automated Reply Re: "POETRYETC Digest - 4 May 2010 to 5 May 2010 (#2010-125)"

Automated Reply Re: "POETRYETC Digest - 4 May 2010 to 5 May 2010 (#2010-125)"

Tom Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 00:17:06 +0100

28 lines

New Thread

Automated Reply Re: "POETRYETC Digest - 6 May 2010 to 7 May 2010 (#2010-127)"

Automated Reply Re: "POETRYETC Digest - 6 May 2010 to 7 May 2010 (#2010-127)"

Tom Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 00:10:46 +0100

28 lines

Re: Automated Reply Re: "POETRYETC Digest - 6 May 2010 to 7 May 2010 (#2010-127)"

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2010 21:24:37 -0500

60 lines

Re: Automated Reply Re: "POETRYETC Digest - 6 May 2010 to 7 May 2010 (#2010-127)"

Uche Ogbuji <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2010 21:00:03 -0600

110 lines

Re: Automated Reply Re: "POETRYETC Digest - 6 May 2010 to 7 May 2010 (#2010-127)"

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 11:28:48 +0800

127 lines

Re: Automated Reply Re: "POETRYETC Digest - 6 May 2010 to 7 May 2010 (#2010-127)"

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 08:05:25 +0100

150 lines

Re: Automated Reply Re: "POETRYETC Digest - 6 May 2010 to 7 May 2010 (#2010-127)"

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 12:38:30 +0100

147 lines

Re: Automated Reply Re: "POETRYETC Digest - 6 May 2010 to 7 May 2010 (#2010-127)"

Uche Ogbuji <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 08:11:25 -0600

170 lines

Re: Automated Reply Re: "POETRYETC Digest - 6 May 2010 to 7 May 2010 (#2010-127)"

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 15:41:23 +0100

45 lines

New Thread

back again

back again

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 May 2010 20:54:06 +1000

26 lines

Re: back again

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 May 2010 08:18:39 -0600

54 lines

New Thread

Ballot bull

Ballot bull

Uche Ogbuji <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2010 07:45:15 -0600

48 lines

New Thread

Beach Snap

Beach Snap

Brian Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 04:36:28 -0700

34 lines

Re: Beach Snap

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 12:56:21 +0100

53 lines

Re: Beach Snap

Frederick Pollack <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 10:55:34 -0400

47 lines

Re: Beach Snap

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 14:48:16 -0400

44 lines

Re: Beach Snap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 13:33:44 -0600

39 lines

Re: Beach Snap

Brian Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2010 04:47:13 -0700

53 lines

New Thread

BlazeVOX 2kX Spring 2010 now online :-)

BlazeVOX 2kX Spring 2010 now online :-)

BlazeVOX [books] <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 May 2010 05:50:31 -0400

264 lines

New Thread

blog

blog

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 May 2010 17:47:05 +0800

31 lines

Re: blog

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 May 2010 09:34:29 -0600

59 lines

Re: blog

Ken Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 May 2010 16:20:02 -0400

23 lines

New Thread

Boo-to-Coos, Cat-calls-and-Coups

Boo-to-Coos, Cat-calls-and-Coups

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 12:34:30 +0100

22 lines

Re: Boo-to-Coos, Cat-calls-and-Coups

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 12:58:10 +0100

114 lines

Re: Boo-to-Coos, Cat-calls-and-Coups

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 22:32:08 +1000

42 lines

Re: Boo-to-Coos, Cat-calls-and-Coups

Desmond Swords <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 14:07:09 +0100

34 lines

Re: Boo-to-Coos, Cat-calls-and-Coups

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 14:20:20 +0100

49 lines

Re: Boo-to-Coos, Cat-calls-and-Coups

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 14:26:38 +0100

21 lines

Re: Boo-to-Coos, Cat-calls-and-Coups

Desmond Swords <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 14:54:42 +0100

78 lines

Re: Boo-to-Coos, Cat-calls-and-Coups

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 11:24:49 -0400

94 lines

Re: Boo-to-Coos, Cat-calls-and-Coups

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 10:44:18 -0500

140 lines

Re: Boo-to-Coos, Cat-calls-and-Coups

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 17:07:14 +0100

190 lines

Re: Boo-to-Coos, Cat-calls-and-Coups

Kenneth Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 12:23:50 -0400

36 lines

Re: Boo-to-Coos, Cat-calls-and-Coups

Millicent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 12:30:35 -0400

132 lines

Re: Boo-to-Coos, Cat-calls-and-Coups

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 17:35:37 +0100

54 lines

Re: Boo-to-Coos, Cat-calls-and-Coups

Bob Grumman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 13:05:49 -0500

21 lines

Re: Boo-to-Coos, Cat-calls-and-Coups

Bob Grumman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 13:15:27 -0500

16 lines

Re: Boo-to-Coos, Cat-calls-and-Coups

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 08:53:21 +1000

35 lines

New Thread

Call for work at Poets for Living Waters - – “Gulf Coast Poems”

Call for work at Poets for Living Waters - – “Gulf Coast Poems”

Peter ciccariello <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 May 2010 11:50:14 -0400

32 lines

New Thread

Catbird Snap

Catbird Snap

Brian Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 15:22:52 -0700

23 lines

Re: Catbird Snap

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 13:33:08 +0800

41 lines

Re: Catbird Snap

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 07:16:52 +0100

40 lines

Re: Catbird Snap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 08:27:26 -0600

37 lines

Re: Catbird Snap

Brian Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 15:04:05 -0700

61 lines

Re: Catbird Snap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2010 09:01:04 -0600

46 lines

Re: Catbird Snap

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2010 17:36:52 +0100

61 lines

New Thread

CleggLit

CleggLit

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 08:07:53 +0100

36 lines

New Thread

confused again

confused again

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 18:30:12 +0100

18 lines

Re: confused again

Bob Grumman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 15:40:44 -0500

18 lines

Re: confused again

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 May 2010 04:55:11 +0300

26 lines

New Thread

Crap

Crap

Tina Bass <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 10:07:58 +0000

51 lines

Re: Crap

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 19:56:32 +0800

67 lines

Re: Crap

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 13:02:41 +0100

109 lines

Re: Crap

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 22:09:02 +1000

25 lines

Re: Crap

Bob Grumman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 09:19:21 -0500

20 lines

Re: Crap

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 09:18:34 -0400

53 lines

Re: Crap

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 14:40:05 +0100

55 lines

Re: Crap

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 12:47:38 -0400

106 lines

Re: Crap

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 18:19:48 +0100

22 lines

Re: Crap

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 13:25:03 -0400

38 lines

Re: Crap

Desmond Swords <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 19:31:55 +0100

27 lines

Re: Crap

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 19:33:56 +0100

64 lines

Re: Crap

Roger Collett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 19:37:30 +0100

38 lines

Re: Crap

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 14:37:56 -0400

37 lines

Re: Crap

Desmond Swords <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 19:53:38 +0100

11 lines

Re: Crap

Desmond Swords <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 19:54:31 +0100

11 lines

Re: Crap

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 14:58:40 -0400

31 lines

Re: Crap

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 13:58:41 -0500

145 lines

Re: Crap

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 15:00:02 -0400

29 lines

Re: Crap

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 20:07:09 +0100

26 lines

Re: Crap

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 20:07:05 +0100

76 lines

Re: Crap

Bob Grumman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 15:11:56 -0500

18 lines

Re: Crap

Bob Grumman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 15:16:38 -0500

27 lines

Re: Crap

Desmond Swords <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 20:14:57 +0100

18 lines

Re: Crap

Roger Collett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 20:18:05 +0100

100 lines

Re: Crap

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 20:21:37 +0100

64 lines

Re: Crap

Desmond Swords <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 20:25:40 +0100

34 lines

Re: Crap

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 14:28:54 -0500

125 lines

Re: Crap

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 20:40:43 +0100

146 lines

Re: Crap

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 20:44:58 +0100

27 lines

Re: Crap

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 15:46:06 -0400

51 lines

Re: Crap

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 14:46:09 -0500

50 lines

Re: Crap

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 14:51:01 -0500

84 lines

Re: Crap

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 14:56:08 -0500

173 lines

Re: Crap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 13:57:03 -0600

39 lines

Re: Crap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 14:07:02 -0600

47 lines

Re: Crap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 14:12:04 -0600

39 lines

Re: Crap

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 21:35:44 +0100

90 lines

Re: Crap

Bob Grumman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 17:02:03 -0500

28 lines

Re: Crap

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 11:16:43 +0100

42 lines

New Thread

Crap and a defence of my poetics

Re: Crap and a defence of my poetics

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 20:57:22 +1000

38 lines

Re: Crap and a defence of my poetics

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 13:56:12 -0600

38 lines

Re: Crap and a defence of my poetics

Tina Bass <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 21:47:08 +0000

28 lines

Re: Crap and a defence of my poetics

Ana Olinto <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 17:17:30 -0300

46 lines

New Thread

Cricket poem prize details

Cricket poem prize details

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 May 2010 09:02:00 +1000

57 lines

Re: Cricket poem prize details

Catherine Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 16:36:00 -0700

20 lines

Re: Cricket poem prize details

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 May 2010 10:46:30 +0800

43 lines

Re: Cricket poem prize details

Catherine Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 23:34:56 -0700

27 lines

Re: Cricket poem prize details

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 May 2010 07:53:26 +0100

37 lines

Re: Cricket poem prize details

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 May 2010 16:46:53 +0800

44 lines

Re: Cricket poem prize details

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 May 2010 18:17:29 +0100

67 lines

Re: Cricket poem prize details

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 May 2010 20:37:10 +0100

74 lines

Re: Cricket poem prize details

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 May 2010 22:31:40 +0100

102 lines

Re: Cricket poem prize details

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 May 2010 23:28:53 +0100

128 lines

Re: Cricket poem prize details

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 May 2010 08:33:42 +0100

153 lines

Re: Cricket poem prize details

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 May 2010 19:39:39 +0100

120 lines

New Thread

cricket poetry prize

cricket poetry prize

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 May 2010 06:22:49 +1000

44 lines

Re: cricket poetry prize

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 May 2010 10:33:48 +0800

61 lines

Re: cricket poetry prize

Caleb Cluff <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 12:27:50 +1000

77 lines

New Thread

cuckoo

cuckoo

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2010 10:01:57 +1000

22 lines

Re: cuckoo

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2010 09:47:49 +0100

37 lines

New Thread

Decline and Fall

Decline and Fall

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 07:29:54 +0100

30 lines

Re: Decline and Fall

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 16:43:29 +1000

47 lines

Re: Decline and Fall

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 14:55:06 +0800

73 lines

Re: Decline and Fall

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 08:14:48 +0100

82 lines

Re: Decline and Fall

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 08:28:30 +0100

96 lines

Re: Decline and Fall

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 18:00:01 +1000

37 lines

Re: Decline and Fall

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 09:16:11 +0100

53 lines

Re: Decline and Fall

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 18:23:29 +1000

20 lines

Re: Decline and Fall

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 09:38:11 +0100

52 lines

Re: Decline and Fall

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 20:02:19 +1000

39 lines

Re: Decline and Fall

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 11:24:16 +0100

73 lines

Re: Decline and Fall

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 11:35:25 +0100

61 lines

Re: Decline and Fall

Dominic Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 11:54:21 +0100

17 lines

Re: Decline and Fall

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 12:53:28 +0100

122 lines

Re: Decline and Fall

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 16:34:49 +0100

35 lines

Re: Decline and Fall

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 11:59:12 -0600

65 lines

Re: Decline and Fall

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 19:40:40 +0100

80 lines

Re: Decline and Fall

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 13:47:59 -0600

41 lines

Re: Decline and Fall

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 23:01:07 +0100

67 lines

Re: Decline and Fall

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 08:54:03 -0600

50 lines

Re: Decline and Fall

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 22:43:43 +0100

71 lines

Re: Decline and Fall

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2010 08:56:46 +1000

92 lines

Re: Decline and Fall

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2010 00:53:56 +0100

110 lines

Re: Decline and Fall

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2010 10:06:15 +1000

135 lines

Re: Decline and Fall

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2010 10:07:39 +1000

149 lines

Re: Decline and Fall

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2010 01:13:56 +0100

151 lines

Re: Decline and Fall

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2010 01:21:06 +0100

153 lines

Re: Decline and Fall

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 May 2010 19:53:02 +1000

32 lines

New Thread

Deleuze and poetry

Deleuze and poetry

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 May 2010 17:04:23 +1000

19 lines

New Thread

Desmond ...

Desmond ...

sharon brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 09:19:30 -0600

15 lines

Re: Desmond ...

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 11:05:21 -0500

39 lines

Re: Desmond ...

Roger Collett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 17:11:27 +0100

59 lines

Re: Desmond ...

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 17:14:42 +0100

79 lines

Re: Desmond ...

sharon brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 10:09:55 -0600

23 lines

Re: Desmond ...

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 11:25:10 -0500

51 lines

Re: Desmond ...

Bob Grumman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 13:10:53 -0500

23 lines

Re: Desmond ...

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 18:14:53 +0100

57 lines

Re: Desmond ...

sharon brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 11:14:20 -0600

24 lines

New Thread

disability politics update

disability politics update

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 20:12:15 +1000

26 lines

Re: disability politics update

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 13:48:53 +0300

39 lines

Re: disability politics update

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 22:02:07 +1000

31 lines

Re: disability politics update

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 09:47:57 -0600

47 lines

Re: disability politics update

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 17:13:22 +0100

59 lines

New Thread

discontinuity

discontinuity

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 May 2010 13:59:20 +0100

33 lines

New Thread

DOES POETRY EXIST WITHOUT THE EGO?

DOES POETRY EXIST WITHOUT THE EGO?

bobbi lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 10:47:41 -0600

11 lines

Re: DOES POETRY EXIST WITHOUT THE EGO?

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 17:51:38 +0100

23 lines

Re: DOES POETRY EXIST WITHOUT THE EGO?

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 10:55:48 -0600

43 lines

Re: DOES POETRY EXIST WITHOUT THE EGO?

Bob Grumman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 13:17:24 -0500

20 lines

Re: DOES POETRY EXIST WITHOUT THE EGO?

sharon brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 10:49:06 -0600

21 lines

Re: DOES POETRY EXIST WITHOUT THE EGO?

sharon brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 12:17:07 -0600

21 lines

Re: DOES POETRY EXIST WITHOUT THE EGO?

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 18:35:03 +0000

27 lines

Re: DOES POETRY EXIST WITHOUT THE EGO?

Uche Ogbuji <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 15:04:56 -0600

30 lines

Re: DOES POETRY EXIST WITHOUT THE EGO?

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 16:08:25 -0500

54 lines

Re: DOES POETRY EXIST WITHOUT THE EGO?

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 10:44:52 +1000

21 lines

Re: DOES POETRY EXIST WITHOUT THE EGO?

bobbi lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 21:32:47 -0600

29 lines

Re: DOES POETRY EXIST WITHOUT THE EGO?

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 15:19:53 +0300

21 lines

Re: DOES POETRY EXIST WITHOUT THE EGO?

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 08:39:22 -0600

53 lines

Re: DOES POETRY EXIST WITHOUT THE EGO?

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 22:50:18 +0800

81 lines

Re: DOES POETRY EXIST WITHOUT THE EGO?

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 10:00:10 -0500

108 lines

Re: DOES POETRY EXIST WITHOUT THE EGO?

sharon brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 09:43:53 -0600

26 lines

New Thread

Ekphrasis Snapped

Ekphrasis Snapped

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 18:52:53 +0100

39 lines

Re: Ekphrasis Snapped

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 12:00:16 -0600

73 lines

Re: Ekphrasis Snapped

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 19:39:20 +0100

97 lines

New Thread

electronic colour

electronic colour

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 11:49:35 +1000

20 lines

Re: electronic colour

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 May 2010 22:28:38 -0400

34 lines

Re: electronic colour

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 08:28:22 -0600

49 lines

Re: electronic colour

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 20:04:06 +1000

33 lines

New Thread

experimental canadian writer

experimental canadian writer

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2010 16:33:18 +1000

22 lines

Re: experimental canadian writer

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2010 08:19:19 -0600

51 lines

Re: experimental canadian writer

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 11:48:48 +1000

23 lines

Re: experimental canadian writer

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 11:54:29 +1000

22 lines

New Thread

From Jump-Cut to This

From Jump-Cut to This

Bob Grumman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 May 2010 20:04:43 -0500

19 lines

Re: From Jump-Cut to This

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2010 08:14:06 -0600

45 lines

Re: From Jump-Cut to This

Bob Grumman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2010 11:16:29 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

From the local paper - attention dog lovers

From the local paper - attention dog lovers

Brian Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2010 04:54:42 -0700

27 lines

Re: From the local paper - attention dog lovers

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2010 13:03:00 +0100

46 lines

Re: From the local paper - attention dog lovers

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2010 23:31:22 +1000

43 lines

Re: From the local paper - attention dog lovers

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2010 15:32:08 +0100

59 lines

New Thread

Fwd: "LOST" on Manhattan's Upper East Side + $145,000 in Literary Prizes...

Fwd: "LOST" on Manhattan's Upper East Side + $145,000 in Literary Prizes...

Catherine Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 May 2010 15:04:24 -0700

130 lines

New Thread

Fwd: "Poetry for the Nervous, Vol 1"

Fwd: "Poetry for the Nervous, Vol 1"

bobbi lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 May 2010 17:41:39 -0600

104 lines

Re: Fwd: "Poetry for the Nervous, Vol 1"

Bob Grumman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 May 2010 21:03:17 -0500

28 lines

Re: Fwd: "Poetry for the Nervous, Vol 1"

bobbi lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 May 2010 19:29:08 -0600

39 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Re: FW: hello and goodbye

Fwd: Re: FW: hello and goodbye

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2010 19:26:14 +1000

49 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Snap The Void

Fwd: Snap The Void

bobbi lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 May 2010 09:56:30 -0600

44 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Tarkovsky

Fwd: Tarkovsky

bobbi lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 May 2010 18:11:00 -0600

81 lines

New Thread

Geddes (to be clear)

Re: Geddes (to be clear)

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 May 2010 15:57:23 -0600

53 lines

Re: Geddes (to be clear)

Desmond Swords <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 May 2010 23:50:08 +0100

89 lines

Re: Geddes (to be clear)

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 08:56:55 -0600

59 lines

New Thread

getting back to the Waste Land, sort of

getting back to the Waste Land, sort of

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 May 2010 16:34:19 -0600

34 lines

Re: getting back to the Waste Land, sort of

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 May 2010 06:54:51 +0100

53 lines

New Thread

Harumph, in Churchillian Tones, "A Time of Change .."

Harumph, in Churchillian Tones, "A Time of Change .."

Joseph Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2010 08:58:25 +0100

21 lines

Re: Harumph, in Churchillian Tones, "A Time of Change .."

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2010 09:47:55 +0100

39 lines

Re: Harumph, in Churchillian Tones, "A Time of Change .."

Joseph Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2010 10:32:12 +0100

60 lines

Re: Harumph, in Churchillian Tones, "A Time of Change .."

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2010 05:39:50 -0400

77 lines

Re: Harumph, in Churchillian Tones, "A Time of Change .."

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2010 10:45:46 +0100

99 lines

Re: Harumph, in Churchillian Tones, "A Time of Change .."

Joseph Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2010 10:45:35 +0100

102 lines

Re: Harumph, in Churchillian Tones, "A Time of Change .."

Joseph Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2010 10:47:14 +0100

111 lines

Re: Harumph, in Churchillian Tones, "A Time of Change .."

Joseph Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2010 10:53:08 +0100

100 lines

Re: Harumph, in Churchillian Tones, "A Time of Change .."

Roger Collett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2010 11:01:18 +0100

115 lines

Re: Harumph, in Churchillian Tones, "A Time of Change .."

Joseph Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2010 11:03:39 +0100

123 lines

Re: Harumph, in Churchillian Tones, "A Time of Change .."

Joseph Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2010 11:33:31 +0100

141 lines

Re: Harumph, in Churchillian Tones, "A Time of Change .."

Dominic Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2010 12:12:20 +0100

21 lines

Re: Harumph, in Churchillian Tones, "A Time of Change .."

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2010 10:27:48 -0500

105 lines

Re: Harumph, in Churchillian Tones, "A Time of Change .."

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2010 10:04:26 -0600

42 lines

Re: Harumph, in Churchillian Tones, "A Time of Change .."

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2010 11:55:24 +0100

131 lines

Re: Harumph, in Churchillian Tones, "A Time of Change .."

Joseph Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2010 15:02:27 +0100

154 lines

Re: Harumph, in Churchillian Tones, "A Time of Change .."

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2010 15:29:04 +0100

170 lines

Re: Harumph, in Churchillian Tones, "A Time of Change .."

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2010 10:36:23 -0400

175 lines

Re: Harumph, in Churchillian Tones, "A Time of Change .."

Joseph Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2010 15:59:29 +0100

198 lines

Re: Harumph, in Churchillian Tones, "A Time of Change .."

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2010 11:23:41 -0400

220 lines

Re: Harumph, in Churchillian Tones, "A Time of Change .."

Joseph Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2010 16:54:51 +0100

249 lines

Re: Harumph, in Churchillian Tones, "A Time of Change .."

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2010 12:04:15 -0400

278 lines

Re: Harumph, in Churchillian Tones, "A Time of Change .."

Joseph Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2010 20:09:07 +0100

326 lines

Re: Harumph, in Churchillian Tones, "A Time of Change .."

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2010 17:40:56 -0400

350 lines

Re: Harumph, in Churchillian Tones, "A Time of Change .."

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2010 08:50:48 +0100

386 lines

Re: Harumph, in Churchillian Tones, "A Time of Change .."

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2010 08:02:59 -0400

13 lines

Re: Harumph, in Churchillian Tones, "A Time of Change .."

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2010 14:31:38 +0100

35 lines

Re: Harumph, in Churchillian Tones, "A Time of Change .."

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2010 14:33:15 +0100

30 lines

Re: Harumph, in Churchillian Tones, "A Time of Change .."

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2010 10:05:58 -0400

49 lines

Re: Harumph, in Churchillian Tones, "A Time of Change .."

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2010 15:26:23 +0100

67 lines

New Thread

hello and goodbye

hello and goodbye

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2010 14:54:58 +1000

25 lines

Re: hello and goodbye

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2010 09:19:04 -0500

48 lines

Re: hello and goodbye

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2010 08:37:40 -0600

55 lines

Re: hello and goodbye

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2010 15:54:02 +0100

69 lines

Re: hello and goodbye

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2010 16:28:20 +0100

40 lines

Re: hello and goodbye

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2010 09:24:39 -0700

66 lines

Re: hello and goodbye

Frederick Pollack <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2010 12:38:58 -0400

37 lines

Re: hello and goodbye

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2010 09:34:35 -0600

77 lines

New Thread

how fascism comes to be

how fascism comes to be

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 11:16:55 +0100

135 lines

Re: how fascism comes to be

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 16:53:23 +0100

162 lines

Re: how fascism comes to be

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 17:14:04 +0100

58 lines

Re: how fascism comes to be

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 17:24:10 +0100

36 lines

Re: how fascism comes to be

Roger Collett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 17:33:00 +0100

24 lines

Re: how fascism comes to be

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 17:38:34 +0100

71 lines

New Thread

I have joined the Scialist Alliance.

I have joined the Scialist Alliance.

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2010 22:18:54 +1000

30 lines

New Thread

Interview announcement

Interview announcement

Millicent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2010 13:59:23 -0400

28 lines

Re: Interview announcement

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2010 11:07:45 -0700

31 lines

New Thread

Interview with Prof of Poetry candidate Stephen Moss

Interview with Prof of Poetry candidate Stephen Moss

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 08:24:11 -0400

19 lines

Re: Interview with Prof of Poetry candidate Stephen Moss

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 11:48:09 -0600

52 lines

Re: Interview with Prof of Poetry candidate Stephen Moss

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 13:57:51 -0400

68 lines

New Thread

iphone media art

iphone media art

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 May 2010 17:32:21 +1000

19 lines

New Thread

Krapp's Last Tape

Krapp's Last Tape

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 13:27:09 +0100

32 lines

Re: Krapp's Last Tape

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 15:58:34 +0300

48 lines

Re: Krapp's Last Tape

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 16:07:43 +0300

57 lines

Re: Krapp's Last Tape

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 09:37:11 -0400

55 lines

Re: Krapp's Last Tape

Bob Grumman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 10:53:01 -0500

26 lines

Re: Krapp's Last Tape

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 09:31:20 -0600

42 lines

Re: Krapp's Last Tape

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 09:05:40 +1000

59 lines

New Thread

Leaving for a bit

Leaving for a bit

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 21:52:00 -0700

34 lines

Re: Leaving for a bit

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 08:28:44 -0600

65 lines

Re: Leaving for a bit

Roger Collett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 16:14:33 +0100

56 lines

New Thread

Lennon Poetry Competition

Lennon Poetry Competition

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 18:52:21 +0800

21 lines

Re: Lennon Poetry Competition

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 08:59:15 -0600

50 lines

Re: Lennon Poetry Competition

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 23:35:17 +0800

78 lines

Re: Lennon Poetry Competition

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 09:41:45 -0600

61 lines

Re: Lennon Poetry Competition

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2010 07:19:40 +1000

83 lines

New Thread

Lest We Forget

Lest We Forget

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2010 18:02:13 +0100

20 lines

Re: Lest We Forget

Ken Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2010 13:37:59 -0400

29 lines

Re: Lest We Forget

Ken Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2010 13:39:39 -0400

26 lines

Re: Lest We Forget

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2010 18:46:19 +0100

53 lines

Re: Lest We Forget

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 09:26:39 -0600

48 lines

New Thread

Let me put this another way

Let me put this another way

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 11:33:46 +1000

19 lines

Re: Let me put this another way

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 21:58:46 -0400

36 lines

Re: Let me put this another way

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 12:23:34 +1000

30 lines

Re: Let me put this another way

Catherine Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 19:29:52 -0700

69 lines

Re: Let me put this another way

Millicent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 22:33:14 -0400

50 lines

Re: Let me put this another way

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 12:41:27 +1000

56 lines

Re: Let me put this another way

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 13:20:49 +1000

71 lines

Re: Let me put this another way

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 13:29:01 +1000

111 lines

Re: Let me put this another way

Anny Ballardini <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 07:02:48 +0200

92 lines

Re: Let me put this another way

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 16:49:19 +1000

123 lines

Re: Let me put this another way

Bob Grumman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 07:31:14 -0500

15 lines

Re: Let me put this another way

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 23:32:40 +1000

26 lines

Re: Let me put this another way

Bob Grumman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 10:10:28 -0500

15 lines

Re: Let me put this another way

Uche Ogbuji <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 08:20:14 -0600

33 lines

Re: Let me put this another way

Bob Grumman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 11:06:01 -0500

26 lines

Re: Let me put this another way

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 09:04:58 -0600

68 lines

Re: Let me put this another way

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 09:09:03 -0600

40 lines

Re: Let me put this another way

Kenneth Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 12:13:29 -0400

77 lines

New Thread

list moderation

list moderation

sharon brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 21:05:56 -0600

34 lines

Re: list moderation

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 23:07:09 -0500

62 lines

Re: list moderation

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 12:27:45 +0800

90 lines

Re: list moderation

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 06:28:25 +0100

44 lines

Re: list moderation

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 16:05:53 +1000

24 lines

Re: list moderation

sharon brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 00:27:39 -0600

32 lines

Re: list moderation

sharon brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 00:29:54 -0600

24 lines

Re: list moderation

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 17:10:49 +1000

63 lines

Re: list moderation

sharon brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 08:57:32 -0600

38 lines

Re: list moderation

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 09:21:23 -0600

61 lines

Re: list moderation

sharon brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 11:41:11 -0600

26 lines

Re: list moderation

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 19:04:50 +0100

42 lines

Re: list moderation

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 14:21:51 -0500

89 lines

Re: list moderation

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 20:57:10 +0100

26 lines

Re: list moderation

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 15:20:37 -0500

51 lines

Re: list moderation

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 08:38:01 +1000

53 lines

New Thread

London Reading 22 June 2010

London Reading 22 June 2010

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 18:16:33 +0100

33 lines

Re: London Reading 22 June 2010

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 11:22:57 -0600

39 lines

New Thread

Mapplethorpe

Mapplethorpe

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 May 2010 17:01:51 +1000

22 lines

Re: Mapplethorpe

Kenneth Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 May 2010 08:53:29 -0400

42 lines

Re: Mapplethorpe

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 May 2010 09:21:42 -0600

49 lines

Re: Mapplethorpe

Catherine Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 May 2010 08:51:11 -0700

30 lines

New Thread

Mardi May + Scrutineer of Splodge at Perth Poetry Club this Sat 15 May

Mardi May + Scrutineer of Splodge at Perth Poetry Club this Sat 15 May

Janet Jackson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2010 15:06:07 +0800

107 lines

New Thread

Mark Weiss and Cuba in Leicester

Mark Weiss and Cuba in Leicester

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 19:22:12 +0100

97 lines

Re: Mark Weiss and Cuba in Leicester

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 11:28:25 +1000

113 lines

Re: Mark Weiss and Cuba in Leicester

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 06:50:44 +0100

137 lines

New Thread

mirrorsnap (sort of) 26 V 10

mirrorsnap (sort of) 26 V 10

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 14:58:56 -0600

38 lines

Re: mirrorsnap (sort of) 26 V 10

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 14:57:56 -0700

49 lines

Re: mirrorsnap (sort of) 26 V 10

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 00:28:06 +0100

54 lines

Re: mirrorsnap (sort of) 26 V 10

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 08:27:34 -0600

54 lines

New Thread

moderation in all things

moderation in all things

sharon brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 10:03:51 -0600

60 lines

Re: moderation in all things

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 11:56:28 +0800

18 lines

New Thread

My Jump-Cut Poem

My Jump-Cut Poem

Bob Grumman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 11:39:22 -0500

50 lines

Re: My Jump-Cut Poem

Desmond Swords <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 17:01:50 +0100

26 lines

Re: My Jump-Cut Poem

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 11:39:57 -0600

81 lines

Re: My Jump-Cut Poem

Bob Grumman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 14:27:45 -0500

21 lines

Re: My Jump-Cut Poem

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 15:32:00 -0500

51 lines

Re: My Jump-Cut Poem

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2010 09:01:11 +1000

50 lines

Re: My Jump-Cut Poem

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2010 09:03:07 +1000

36 lines

Re: My Jump-Cut Poem

Bob Grumman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 20:42:31 -0500

16 lines

Re: My Jump-Cut Poem

Desmond Swords <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2010 07:09:18 +0100

42 lines

Re: My Jump-Cut Poem

Desmond Swords <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2010 09:13:57 +0100

20 lines

Re: My Jump-Cut Poem

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2010 17:32:03 +0800

35 lines

Re: My Jump-Cut Poem

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2010 14:45:27 +0100

35 lines

Re: My Jump-Cut Poem

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2010 15:07:53 +0100

34 lines

New Thread

New issue of Versification

New issue of Versification

Uche Ogbuji <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 17:17:29 -0600

25 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2010 00:52:33 +0100

35 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2010 10:02:07 +1000

53 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Uche Ogbuji <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 18:10:46 -0600

85 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2010 01:10:29 +0100

51 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 20:14:36 -0400

75 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Uche Ogbuji <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 18:23:45 -0600

46 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 21:10:25 -0400

78 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2010 04:53:20 +0100

111 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2010 09:29:03 -0400

57 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2010 10:35:09 -0600

69 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 07:48:23 +0100

85 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Uche Ogbuji <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 08:49:30 -0600

42 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 11:09:49 -0400

57 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 16:31:02 +0100

98 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 17:42:18 +0100

72 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 17:51:32 +0100

91 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 12:56:34 -0400

46 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 13:13:24 -0400

55 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Desmond Swords <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 19:30:37 +0100

41 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 20:20:12 +0100

45 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 20:25:15 +0100

85 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 20:35:47 +0100

38 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 15:46:37 -0400

112 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 20:54:25 +0100

55 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 14:55:44 -0500

117 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 20:56:59 +0100

155 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Roger Collett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 21:00:50 +0100

177 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Uche Ogbuji <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 14:20:46 -0600

38 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 16:28:28 -0400

58 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Uche Ogbuji <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 14:39:54 -0600

46 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 21:50:16 +0100

33 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Uche Ogbuji <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 15:03:03 -0600

62 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 22:15:31 +0100

30 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 17:21:15 -0400

89 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Uche Ogbuji <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 15:47:04 -0600

80 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 22:51:49 +0100

212 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 16:04:05 -0600

39 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 16:13:14 -0600

43 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 18:38:36 -0400

150 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 18:50:00 -0400

56 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Uche Ogbuji <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 19:42:31 -0600

141 lines

New issue of Versification

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 23:01:31 -0400

194 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 May 2010 08:58:32 +0100

137 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 May 2010 14:06:13 +0100

220 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 May 2010 14:18:19 +0100

249 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Bob Grumman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 May 2010 10:00:14 -0500

22 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 May 2010 14:59:45 +0100

29 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 May 2010 10:11:44 -0400

46 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Desmond Swords <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 May 2010 15:32:59 +0100

25 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Uche Ogbuji <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 May 2010 08:51:43 -0600

94 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 May 2010 09:15:58 -0600

56 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Uche Ogbuji <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 May 2010 09:05:06 -0600

50 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 May 2010 09:26:46 -0600

82 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 May 2010 16:31:52 +0100

64 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Uche Ogbuji <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 May 2010 09:41:52 -0600

39 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 May 2010 16:54:32 +0100

29 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 May 2010 16:58:49 +0100

35 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 May 2010 17:04:46 +0100

38 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 May 2010 17:26:24 +0100

76 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 May 2010 17:27:46 +0100

49 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 May 2010 12:31:31 -0400

76 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 May 2010 17:58:33 +0100

92 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 May 2010 11:18:52 -0600

47 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 May 2010 11:34:00 -0600

52 lines

Re: New issue of Versification

Uche Ogbuji <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 May 2010 19:17:22 -0600

109 lines

New Thread

New life: pup snap series

New life: pup snap series

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 15:26:23 +1000

76 lines

Re: New life: pup snap series

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 14:49:38 +0800

94 lines

Re: New life: pup snap series

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 17:21:41 +1000

21 lines

Re: New life: pup snap series

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 17:18:14 +0100

89 lines

New Thread

new photography

new photography

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 09:35:24 -0600

38 lines

New Thread

Next door 22

Next door 22

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2010 17:25:26 +0100

70 lines

Re: Next door 22

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 09:24:07 -0600

38 lines

Re: Next door 22

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 16:36:12 +0100

110 lines

Re: Next door 22

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 13:45:15 -0600

48 lines

Re: Next door 22

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 14:24:31 -0600

38 lines

Re: Next door 22

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 21:51:40 +0100

79 lines

New Thread

Next door 23

Next door 23

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 11:33:09 +0100

50 lines

New Thread

Next door 23 - properly or better punctuated, sorry

Next door 23 - properly or better punctuated, sorry

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 11:36:14 +0100

73 lines

Re: Next door 23 - properly or better punctuated, sorry

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 21:17:35 +1000

85 lines

Re: Next door 23 - properly or better punctuated, sorry

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 13:55:56 +0100

130 lines

Re: Next door 23 - properly or better punctuated, sorry

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 10:21:28 -0600

44 lines

Re: Next door 23 - properly or better punctuated, sorry

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2010 13:04:57 +0100

81 lines

New Thread

Next door 24

Next door 24

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2010 13:09:29 +0100

49 lines

New Thread

Next door 25

Re: Next door 25

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2010 14:49:31 +0100

51 lines

Re: Next door 25

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2010 08:32:10 -0600

84 lines

Re: Next door 25

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2010 15:43:21 +0100

120 lines

New Thread

Next door 26 The trouble

Next door 26 The trouble

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2010 10:58:21 +0100

47 lines

Re: Next door 26 The trouble

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2010 16:47:43 -0600

77 lines

Re: Next door 26 The trouble

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2010 08:17:32 +0100

115 lines

Re: Next door 26 The trouble

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2010 08:38:25 -0600

44 lines

New Thread

Next door 27 An entertainment

Next door 27 An entertainment

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2010 11:41:07 +0100

50 lines

New Thread

Next door 28 Aliens

Next door 28 Aliens

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2010 09:53:11 +0100

59 lines

New Thread

Next door 29

Next door 29

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2010 10:42:11 +0100

56 lines

New Thread

Next door 30

Next door 30

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 May 2010 14:27:28 +0100

48 lines

Re: Next door 30

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 May 2010 21:51:07 +0800

69 lines

Re: Next door 30

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 May 2010 15:11:46 +0100

125 lines

Re: Next door 30

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 May 2010 09:51:13 -0600

40 lines

Re: Next door 30

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 May 2010 17:02:38 +0100

85 lines

New Thread

Next door 31

Next door 31

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 10:17:51 +0100

54 lines

Re: Next door 31

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 08:38:22 -0600

83 lines

Re: Next door 31

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 15:56:22 +0100

118 lines

New Thread

Next door 32

Next door 32

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 14:53:30 +0100

54 lines

Re: Next door 32

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 11:20:10 -0600

88 lines

Re: Next door 32

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 18:36:34 +0100

131 lines

New Thread

next door 33

next door 33

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 May 2010 17:35:05 +0100

34 lines

New Thread

Next door 34

Next door 34

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 12:46:04 +0100

39 lines

New Thread

Next door 34 & 35

Re: Next door 34 & 35

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2010 11:59:16 -0600

40 lines

Re: Next door 34 & 35

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2010 19:16:56 +0100

39 lines

New Thread

Next door 35

Next door 35

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2010 10:31:39 +0100

49 lines

New Thread

nexus

nexus

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 04:28:54 +0300

50 lines

Re: nexus

Desmond Swords <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 03:34:26 +0100

231 lines

Re: nexus

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 12:53:24 +1000

83 lines

Nexus

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 May 2010 14:14:30 +0100

207 lines

New Thread

non-digital

non-digital

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2010 11:46:38 +1000

18 lines

New Thread

not quite a snap

not quite a snap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 08:20:56 -0600

61 lines

Re: not quite a snap

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 15:50:06 +0100

78 lines

Re: not quite a snap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 09:20:10 -0600

38 lines

Re: not quite a snap

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 14:03:28 +0100

76 lines

New Thread

Not the J words ...

Not the J words ...

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 01:31:01 +0100

21 lines

Re: Not the J words ...

Uche Ogbuji <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 15:21:06 -0600

39 lines

New Thread

Notice from Catherine M. Bennett

Notice from Catherine M. Bennett

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2010 13:47:36 -0700

53 lines

New Thread

Notice: Mudlark

Notice: Mudlark

William Slaughter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 11:57:41 -0400

35 lines

New Thread

Orpheus in Grimsby

Orpheus in Grimsby

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 May 2010 06:52:01 +0100

34 lines

New Thread

Pas de deux in Panama

Pas de deux in Panama

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2010 22:31:58 +0100

27 lines

New Thread

pat snap )¬`¬`¬`¬) Wednesday, 19 May 2010

pat snap )¬`¬`¬`¬) Wednesday, 19 May 2010

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 08:23:51 +0100

24 lines

Re: pat snap )¬`¬`¬`¬) Wednesday, 19 May 2010

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 08:31:07 +0100

41 lines

Re: pat snap )¬`¬`¬`¬) Wednesday, 19 May 2010

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 08:33:42 -0600

52 lines

Re: pat snap )¬`¬`¬`¬) Wednesday, 19 May 2010

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 18:23:34 +0100

74 lines

New Thread

pat snap *^"^"^"^*Wednesday, 12 May 2010

pat snap *^"^"^"^*Wednesday, 12 May 2010

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2010 09:44:47 +0100

32 lines

Re: pat snap *^"^"^"^*Wednesday, 12 May 2010

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2010 05:10:31 -0400

46 lines

Re: pat snap *^"^"^"^*Wednesday, 12 May 2010

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2010 09:33:52 -0600

39 lines

Re: pat snap *^"^"^"^*Wednesday, 12 May 2010

Brian Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2010 05:02:00 -0700

45 lines

New Thread

pat snap *_^_^_^_* Wednesday, May 26, 2010 Re: possible offenses that result in banning?

pat snap *_^_^_^_* Wednesday, May 26, 2010 Re: possible offenses that result in banning?

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 06:46:28 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

pat snap 2 (*_^_^_^_*) Wednesday, May 26, 2010 for lawrence upton

pat snap 2 (*_^_^_^_*) Wednesday, May 26, 2010 for lawrence upton

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 07:13:59 +0100

39 lines

Re: pat snap 2 (*_^_^_^_*) Wednesday, May 26, 2010 for lawrence upton

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 15:22:14 +0300

47 lines

Re: pat snap 2 (*_^_^_^_*) Wednesday, May 26, 2010 for lawrence upton

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 12:16:52 +0100

46 lines

New Thread

pat snap =+=+=+=Wednesday, 05 May 2010

pat snap =+=+=+=Wednesday, 05 May 2010

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 11:32:34 +0100

24 lines

Re: pat snap =+=+=+=Wednesday, 05 May 2010

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 07:32:31 -0400

39 lines

Re: pat snap =+=+=+=Wednesday, 05 May 2010

Frederick Pollack <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 10:56:03 -0400

35 lines

Re: pat snap =+=+=+=Wednesday, 05 May 2010

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 16:28:47 +0100

49 lines

Re: pat snap =+=+=+=Wednesday, 05 May 2010

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 11:41:28 -0400

35 lines

Re: pat snap =+=+=+=Wednesday, 05 May 2010

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 12:06:53 -0600

37 lines

Re: pat snap =+=+=+=Wednesday, 05 May 2010

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 09:06:00 +0800

53 lines

New Thread

Performance versus Poetry

Performance versus Poetry

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 23:22:20 +0100

25 lines

Re: Performance versus Poetry

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 08:58:48 +1000

43 lines

Re: Performance versus Poetry

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 01:52:42 +0100

60 lines

Re: Performance versus Poetry

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 11:08:54 +1000

84 lines

Re: Performance versus Poetry

bobbi lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 19:26:49 -0600

110 lines

Re: Performance versus Poetry

Caleb Cluff <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 12:39:53 +1000

107 lines

Re: Performance versus Poetry

Catherine Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 19:52:40 -0700

30 lines

Re: Performance versus Poetry

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 05:37:33 +0100

151 lines

Re: Performance versus Poetry

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 14:48:05 +1000

188 lines

Re: Performance versus Poetry

Anny Ballardini <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 08:16:38 +0200

244 lines

Re: Performance versus Poetry

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 16:28:30 +1000

274 lines

Re: Performance versus Poetry

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 08:19:02 +0100

45 lines

Re: Performance versus Poetry

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 10:38:54 +0100

318 lines

Re: Performance versus Poetry

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 23:05:47 +1000

342 lines

Re: Performance versus Poetry

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 15:41:24 +0100

304 lines

Re: Performance versus Poetry

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 08:50:20 -0600

50 lines

Re: Performance versus Poetry

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 08:53:42 -0600

62 lines

Re: Performance versus Poetry

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 16:55:23 +0100

378 lines

Re: Performance versus Poetry

Catherine Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 09:05:47 -0700

21 lines

Re: Performance versus Poetry

bobbi lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 10:34:33 -0600

83 lines

Re: Performance versus Poetry

bobbi lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 10:47:19 -0600

277 lines

Re: Performance versus Poetry

bobbi lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 11:01:17 -0600

37 lines

Re: Performance versus Poetry

Anny Ballardini <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 22:26:28 +0200

139 lines

Re: Performance versus Poetry

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2010 06:34:02 +1000

37 lines

Re: Performance versus Poetry

Catherine Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 15:50:26 -0700

32 lines

Re: Performance versus Poetry

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2010 10:08:37 +1000

66 lines

Re: Performance versus Poetry

Catherine Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 17:22:32 -0700

17 lines

Re: Performance versus Poetry

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2010 11:51:58 +1000

28 lines

Re: Performance versus Poetry

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2010 09:57:19 +0100

110 lines

Re: Performance versus Poetry

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2010 10:41:38 +0100

42 lines

Re: Performance versus Poetry

bobbi lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2010 09:04:50 -0600

83 lines

Re: Performance versus Poetry

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2010 09:53:01 -0600

60 lines

Re: Performance versus Poetry

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2010 17:43:22 +0100

75 lines

Re: Performance versus Poetry

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2010 20:47:38 +0100

32 lines

New Thread

Perth Poetry Club: Molly Hall Sat 29 May. + Jun, Jul, Aug lineups

Perth Poetry Club: Molly Hall Sat 29 May. + Jun, Jul, Aug lineups

Janet Jackson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 19:14:55 +0800

132 lines

New Thread

poem in Singapore magazine

Re: poem in Singapore magazine

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 May 2010 17:06:15 +1000

43 lines

New Thread

Polari

Polari

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 May 2010 19:04:10 +0100

52 lines

New Thread

Policies & Procedures

Policies & Procedures

sharon brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 10:23:37 -0600

71 lines

Re: Policies & Procedures

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 12:51:02 -0500

97 lines

Re: Policies & Procedures

Kenneth Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 14:59:11 -0400

22 lines

Re: Policies & Procedures

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 09:05:15 +1000

19 lines

Re: Policies & Procedures

Caleb Cluff <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 13:03:48 +1000

30 lines

Re: Policies & Procedures

sharon brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 21:12:17 -0600

36 lines

Re: Policies & Procedures

sharon brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 21:17:04 -0600

50 lines

Re: Policies & Procedures

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 18:06:53 +1000

28 lines

Re: Policies & Procedures

Bob Grumman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 06:29:48 -0500

15 lines

Re: Policies & Procedures

Bob Grumman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 06:42:03 -0500

28 lines

Re: Policies & Procedures

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 17:02:47 +0100

50 lines

Re: Policies & Procedures

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2010 12:03:22 +0100

68 lines

Re: Policies & Procedures

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2010 14:28:49 +0100

98 lines

Re: Policies & Procedures

Kenneth Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2010 10:47:42 -0400

35 lines

New Thread

possible offenses that result in banning?

possible offenses that result in banning?

sharon brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 00:25:02 -0600

64 lines

Re: possible offenses that result in banning?

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 07:59:55 +0100

82 lines

Re: possible offenses that result in banning?

sharon brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 00:52:55 -0600

24 lines

Re: possible offenses that result in banning?

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 08:17:10 +0100

44 lines

Re: possible offenses that result in banning?

Roger Collett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 08:22:27 +0100

57 lines

Re: possible offenses that result in banning?

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 08:25:18 +0100

62 lines

Re: possible offenses that result in banning?

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 17:25:35 +1000

24 lines

Re: possible offenses that result in banning?

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 08:39:16 +0100

42 lines

Re: possible offenses that result in banning?

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 09:02:33 +0100

49 lines

Re: possible offenses that result in banning?

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 09:23:45 +0100

50 lines

Re: possible offenses that result in banning?

Uche Ogbuji <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 06:10:44 -0600

88 lines

Re: possible offenses that result in banning?

Uche Ogbuji <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 06:13:37 -0600

70 lines

Re: possible offenses that result in banning?

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 09:29:03 -0400

143 lines

Re: possible offenses that result in banning?

Kenneth Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 12:10:49 -0400

25 lines

Re: possible offenses that result in banning?

Kenneth Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 12:12:54 -0400

24 lines

Re: possible offenses that result in banning?

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 22:00:33 +0100

66 lines

Re: possible offenses that result in banning?

Roger Collett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 22:09:18 +0100

79 lines

Re: possible offenses that result in banning?

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 22:57:14 +0100

21 lines

Re: possible offenses that result in banning?

Roger Collett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 23:07:25 +0100

34 lines

Re: possible offenses that result in banning?

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 01:49:11 +0100

18 lines

Re: possible offenses that result in banning?

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 06:37:11 +0100

24 lines

Re: possible offenses that result in banning?

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 15:21:19 +0300

77 lines

Re: possible offenses that result in banning?

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 08:40:42 -0600

37 lines