JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for GP-UK Archives


GP-UK Archives

GP-UK Archives


April 2010


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

2 assertions on appraisal and (re)validation (30 messages)
7/12 (7 messages)
<No subject> (1 message)
a claim to silence? (1 message)
AA membership (3 messages)
article in BJHC & IM (1 message)
BCS PHCSG Summer Conference 24-26 May 2010 - BOOK NOW (1 message)
business-like activity in the NHS, DoH vs the invisible hand and the EEC rules? (1 message)
CD prescriptions (10 messages)
Chads scores and AF (1 message)
Chest pain (10 messages)
complaints procedures (2 messages)
Cyberounds: Fathers are on the hook too... (1 message)
Cyberounds: Not for Women Only (1 message)
Cyberounds: Too Many Apples, Too Few Pears (1 message)
Deletion of messages (1 message)
election (4 messages)
Email discharges and Apollo or docman (6 messages)
EMIS or SystmOne (2 messages)
EMIS or SystmWnk (5 messages)
Female Sexual Dysfunction (2 messages)
Fit notes (4 messages)
FW: ISHIMR 2010 - 3rd call for papers (1 message)
gmc revalidation again-'360 degree feedback' (1 message)
hyperglycaemai (3 messages)
Is the data used to support the Digital Economy Bill 2010 as shaky as the US PRO-IP Act 2008? (2 messages)
Journey planner for cyclists (5 messages)
marketing of GP computer systems (1 message)
N3 SMTP settings/local smtp server config (13 messages)
National wireless network contract (1 message)
Nexus One (4 messages)
not medical - size of emails and Google or other intermediate conveyors (10 messages)
privacy security and government databases (1 message)
Techy help wanted! (1 message)
Threat estimation. [Was: Re: EMIS or SystmOne] (2 messages)
Thunderbird and nhs mail (1 message)
User group lists was [ EMIS or SystmOne] (1 message)
Weekly dispensing (8 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

GP-UK Home

GP-UK Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

2 assertions on appraisal and (re)validation

Re: 2 assertions on appraisal and (re)validation

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Apr 2010 17:49:01 +0100

46 lines

Re: 2 assertions on appraisal and (re)validation

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Apr 2010 18:36:53 +0100

74 lines

Re: 2 assertions on appraisal and (re)validation

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Apr 2010 21:25:58 +0100

106 lines

Re: 2 assertions on appraisal and (re)validation

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:46:05 +0000

144 lines

Re: 2 assertions on appraisal and (re)validation

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Apr 2010 12:07:26 +0100

124 lines

Re: 2 assertions on appraisal and (re)validation

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Apr 2010 12:08:49 +0100

246 lines

Re: 2 assertions on appraisal and (re)validation

Adrian Midgley (Gmail) <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Apr 2010 12:25:26 +0100

43 lines

Re: 2 assertions on appraisal and (re)validation

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Apr 2010 06:42:16 +0000

115 lines

Re: 2 assertions on appraisal and (re)validation

Alan Ferris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:34:24 +0100

141 lines

Re: 2 assertions on appraisal and (re)validation

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:11:57 +0100

91 lines

Re: 2 assertions on appraisal and (re)validation

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:49:44 +0000

221 lines

Re: 2 assertions on appraisal and (re)validation

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Apr 2010 13:40:11 +0100

273 lines

Re: 2 assertions on appraisal and (re)validation

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Apr 2010 13:45:02 +0100

26 lines

Re: 2 assertions on appraisal and (re)validation

Adrian Midgley (Gmail) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:41:54 +0100

54 lines

Re: 2 assertions on appraisal and (re)validation

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Apr 2010 13:20:13 +0100

50 lines

2 assertions on appraisal and (re)validation

Alan Ferris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:11:14 +0100

68 lines

Re: 2 assertions on appraisal and (re)validation

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:44:54 +0100

28 lines

Re: 2 assertions on appraisal and (re)validation

Alan Ferris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:48:41 +0100

43 lines

Re: 2 assertions on appraisal and (re)validation

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:11:04 +0100

26 lines

Re: 2 assertions on appraisal and (re)validation

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Apr 2010 19:10:56 +0100

25 lines

Re: 2 assertions on appraisal and (re)validation

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:03:00 +0100

69 lines

Re: 2 assertions on appraisal and (re)validation

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Apr 2010 23:59:45 +0100

617 lines

Re: 2 assertions on appraisal and (re)validation

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Apr 2010 01:32:22 +0100

49 lines

Re: 2 assertions on appraisal and (re)validation

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:44:07 +0000

93 lines

Re: 2 assertions on appraisal and (re)validation

Karen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:49:26 +0100

13 lines

Re: 2 assertions on appraisal and (re)validation

Robert Treharne Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:04:26 +0100

24 lines

Re: 2 assertions on appraisal and (re)validation

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:59:01 +0100

43 lines

Re: 2 assertions on appraisal and (re)validation

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:02:49 +0100

19 lines

Re: 2 assertions on appraisal and (re)validation

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:24:57 +0100

25 lines

Re: 2 assertions on appraisal and (re)validation

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:40:04 +0000

118 lines

New Thread

7/12

7/12

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Apr 2010 11:04:04 +0100

30 lines

Re: 7/12

Graham Balin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Apr 2010 20:44:31 +1000

83 lines

Re: 7/12

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:52:38 +0100

62 lines

Re: 7/12

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Apr 2010 17:11:54 +0100

23 lines

Re: 7/12

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Apr 2010 18:24:24 +0100

32 lines

Re: 7/12

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Apr 2010 19:32:17 +0100

133 lines

Re: 7/12

Piers Longhorn <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Apr 2010 12:13:25 +0100

201 lines

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Apr 2010 11:36:32 +0000

46 lines

New Thread

a claim to silence?

a claim to silence?

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:36:42 +0100

96 lines

New Thread

AA membership

AA membership

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Apr 2010 14:58:19 +0100

18 lines

Re: AA membership

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Apr 2010 17:29:24 +0100

41 lines

Re: AA membership

Paul Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Apr 2010 17:42:24 +0100

38 lines

New Thread

article in BJHC & IM

article in BJHC & IM

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Apr 2010 08:35:01 +0100

15 lines

New Thread

BCS PHCSG Summer Conference 24-26 May 2010 - BOOK NOW

BCS PHCSG Summer Conference 24-26 May 2010 - BOOK NOW

Robert Treharne Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Apr 2010 14:13:51 +0100

640 lines

New Thread

business-like activity in the NHS, DoH vs the invisible hand and the EEC rules?

business-like activity in the NHS, DoH vs the invisible hand and the EEC rules?

Adrian Midgley (Gmail) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:06:34 +0100

45 lines

New Thread

CD prescriptions

CD prescriptions

Piers Longhorn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:26:03 +0100

19 lines

Re: CD prescriptions

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:34:30 +0100

30 lines

Re: CD prescriptions

Russell Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:34:56 +0100

84 lines

Re: CD prescriptions

Adrian Midgley (Gmail) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:50:20 +0100

64 lines

Re: CD prescriptions

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:42:24 +0100

30 lines

Re: CD prescriptions

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:22:32 +0100

68 lines

Re: CD prescriptions

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:50:36 +0100

88 lines

Re: CD prescriptions

Markwick Christopher (Medway PCT) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:20:13 +0100

55 lines

Re: CD prescriptions

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Apr 2010 09:21:58 -0400

190 lines

Re: CD prescriptions

Jel Coward <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Apr 2010 01:14:53 -0700

29 lines

New Thread

Chads scores and AF

Chads scores and AF

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Apr 2010 18:13:45 +0100

46 lines

New Thread

Chest pain

Chest pain

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Apr 2010 20:45:10 +0100

20 lines

Re: Chest pain

Jel Coward <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:51:33 -0700

28 lines

Re: Chest pain

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Apr 2010 20:57:53 +0100

26 lines

Re: Chest pain

Markwick Christopher (Medway PCT) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Apr 2010 21:19:46 +0100

50 lines

Re: Chest pain

Jel Coward <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:22:41 -0700

64 lines

Re: Chest pain

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:19:07 +0100

23 lines

Re: Chest pain

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:34:44 +0100

103 lines

Re: Chest pain

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Apr 2010 08:47:52 +0100

31 lines

Re: Chest pain

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:43:00 +0100

23 lines

Re: Chest pain

Jel Coward <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:35:29 -0700

36 lines

New Thread

complaints procedures

complaints procedures

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:36:14 +0000

48 lines

Re: complaints procedures

Jel Coward <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:13:22 -0700

32 lines

New Thread

Cyberounds: Fathers are on the hook too...

Cyberounds: Fathers are on the hook too...

Harry Levy <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Apr 2010 08:48:05 -0400

181 lines

New Thread

Cyberounds: Not for Women Only

Cyberounds: Not for Women Only

Harry Levy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Apr 2010 10:43:07 -0400

132 lines

New Thread

Cyberounds: Too Many Apples, Too Few Pears

Cyberounds: Too Many Apples, Too Few Pears

Harry Levy <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Apr 2010 08:53:20 -0400

189 lines

New Thread

Deletion of messages

Deletion of messages

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:30:05 +0100

124 lines

New Thread

election

election

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Apr 2010 10:12:11 +0000

58 lines

Re: election

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Apr 2010 21:30:00 +0100

42 lines

Re: election

John Glasspool <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:03:58 +0100

60 lines

Re: election

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:34:27 +0100

54 lines

New Thread

Email discharges and Apollo or docman

Email discharges and Apollo or docman

Dinesh Patel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Apr 2010 23:48:48 +0100

16 lines

Re: Email discharges and Apollo or docman

Markwick Christopher (Medway PCT) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:54:14 +0100

55 lines

Re: Email discharges and Apollo or docman

Adrian Midgley (Gmail) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:13:27 +0100

28 lines

Re: Email discharges and Apollo or docman

Markwick Christopher (Medway PCT) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:12:16 +0100

66 lines

Re: Email discharges and Apollo or docman

Colin Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:04:45 +0100

82 lines

Re: Email discharges and Apollo or docman

Dinesh Patel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Apr 2010 12:35:08 +0100

104 lines

New Thread

EMIS or SystmOne

Re: EMIS or SystmOne

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Apr 2010 00:23:30 +0100

86 lines

Re: EMIS or SystmOne

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Apr 2010 14:56:30 +0100

21 lines

New Thread

EMIS or SystmWnk

Re: EMIS or SystmWnk

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Apr 2010 19:17:10 +1000

23 lines

Re: EMIS or SystmWnk

Markwick Christopher (Medway PCT) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Apr 2010 07:41:30 +0100

67 lines

Re: EMIS or SystmWnk

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Apr 2010 12:14:58 +0100

150 lines

Re: EMIS or SystmWnk

Graham Balin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Apr 2010 21:30:39 +1000

33 lines

Re: EMIS or SystmWnk

Adrian Midgley (Gmail) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Apr 2010 14:24:37 +0100

31 lines

New Thread

Female Sexual Dysfunction

Female Sexual Dysfunction

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Apr 2010 10:39:29 +0000

55 lines

Re: Female Sexual Dysfunction

Robert Treharne Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Apr 2010 11:44:16 +0100

28 lines

New Thread

Fit notes

Fit notes

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Apr 2010 21:51:09 +0100

18 lines

Re: Fit notes

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Apr 2010 11:00:52 +0100

26 lines

Re: Fit notes

John Glasspool <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Apr 2010 07:58:04 +0100

33 lines

Re: Fit notes

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Apr 2010 18:24:43 -0400

133 lines

New Thread

FW: ISHIMR 2010 - 3rd call for papers

FW: ISHIMR 2010 - 3rd call for papers

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Apr 2010 00:29:29 +0100

225 lines

New Thread

gmc revalidation again-'360 degree feedback'

gmc revalidation again-'360 degree feedback'

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Apr 2010 21:28:24 +0000

99 lines

New Thread

hyperglycaemai

hyperglycaemai

Jel Coward <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Apr 2010 14:36:57 -0700

22 lines

Re: hyperglycaemai

Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Apr 2010 10:52:58 +0100

21 lines

Re: hyperglycaemai

Katie Law <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Apr 2010 12:14:07 +0100

34 lines

New Thread

Is the data used to support the Digital Economy Bill 2010 as shaky as the US PRO-IP Act 2008?

Is the data used to support the Digital Economy Bill 2010 as shaky as the US PRO-IP Act 2008?

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Apr 2010 08:36:24 +0100

27 lines

Re: Is the data used to support the Digital Economy Bill 2010 as shaky as the US PRO-IP Act 2008?

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:15:04 +0100

47 lines

New Thread

Journey planner for cyclists

Journey planner for cyclists

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Apr 2010 06:37:26 +0100

17 lines

Re: Journey planner for cyclists

Robert Treharne Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Apr 2010 07:09:21 +0100

25 lines

Re: Journey planner for cyclists

Russell Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Apr 2010 07:22:48 +0100

39 lines

Re: Journey planner for cyclists

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Apr 2010 20:44:11 +0100

28 lines

Re: Journey planner for cyclists

Adrian Midgley (Gmail) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:52:09 +0100

25 lines

New Thread

marketing of GP computer systems

marketing of GP computer systems

Adrian Midgley (Gmail) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:06:24 +0100

16 lines

New Thread

N3 SMTP settings/local smtp server config

N3 SMTP settings/local smtp server config

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Apr 2010 21:11:00 +0100

59 lines

Re: N3 SMTP settings/local smtp server config

Adrian Midgley (Gmail) <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Apr 2010 00:52:18 +0100

80 lines

Re: N3 SMTP settings/local smtp server config

Walter Tim (FALKLAND SURGERY) <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Apr 2010 10:59:29 +0100

97 lines

Re: N3 SMTP settings/local smtp server config

Adrian Midgley (Gmail) <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Apr 2010 11:09:18 +0100

19 lines

Re: N3 SMTP settings/local smtp server config

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Apr 2010 21:22:50 +0100

24 lines

Re: N3 SMTP settings/local smtp server config

Holmes Alistair (WEST SUSSEX PCT) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Apr 2010 09:54:07 +0100

61 lines

Re: N3 SMTP settings/local smtp server config

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:10:53 +0100

146 lines

Re: N3 SMTP settings/local smtp server config

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:23:08 +0100

14 lines

Re: N3 SMTP settings/local smtp server config

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Apr 2010 19:48:52 +0100

37 lines

Re: N3 SMTP settings/local smtp server config

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:01:44 +0100

36 lines

Re: N3 SMTP settings/local smtp server config

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Apr 2010 06:37:45 +0100

96 lines

Re: N3 SMTP settings/local smtp server config

Adrian Midgley (Gmail) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Apr 2010 10:27:40 +0100

30 lines

Re: N3 SMTP settings/local smtp server config

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Apr 2010 10:42:41 +0100

88 lines

New Thread

National wireless network contract

National wireless network contract

Adrian Midgley (Gmail) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:04:27 +0100

12 lines

New Thread

Nexus One

Nexus One

Jel Coward <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Apr 2010 08:10:17 -0700

25 lines

Re: Nexus One

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Apr 2010 21:15:27 +0100

27 lines

Re: Nexus One

Mike Carey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Apr 2010 11:33:02 +0100

110 lines

Re: Nexus One

Jel Coward <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Apr 2010 17:31:36 -0700

38 lines

New Thread

not medical - size of emails and Google or other intermediate conveyors

not medical - size of emails and Google or other intermediate conveyors

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Apr 2010 19:33:33 +0100

31 lines

Re: not medical - size of emails and Google or other intermediate conveyors

Adrian Midgley (Gmail) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Apr 2010 19:52:09 +0100

17 lines

Re: not medical - size of emails and Google or other intermediate conveyors

Russell Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Apr 2010 20:34:02 +0100

84 lines

Re: not medical - size of emails and Google or other intermediate conveyors

Ian McNicoll <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Apr 2010 20:17:40 +0100

82 lines

Re: not medical - size of emails and Google or other intermediate conveyors

Adrian Midgley (Gmail) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Apr 2010 20:52:38 +0100

56 lines

Re: not medical - size of emails and Google or other intermediate conveyors

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Apr 2010 06:37:05 +0100

54 lines

Re: not medical - size of emails and Google or other intermediate conveyors

Adrian Midgley (Gmail) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:12:12 +0100

27 lines

Re: not medical - size of emails and Google or other intermediate conveyors

Chris Salter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:00:09 +0100

59 lines

Re: not medical - size of emails and Google or other intermediate conveyors

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:37:57 +0100

12 lines

Re: not medical - size of emails and Google or other intermediate conveyors

Chris Salter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:41:19 +0100

76 lines

New Thread

privacy security and government databases

privacy security and government databases

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Apr 2010 07:43:51 +0100

29 lines

New Thread

Techy help wanted!

Techy help wanted!

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:09:02 +0100

34 lines

New Thread

Threat estimation. [Was: Re: EMIS or SystmOne]

Re: Threat estimation. [Was: Re: EMIS or SystmOne]

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Apr 2010 01:21:34 +0100

65 lines

Re: Threat estimation. [Was: Re: EMIS or SystmOne]

mark westwood <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Apr 2010 09:30:22 +0100

165 lines

New Thread

Thunderbird and nhs mail

Thunderbird and nhs mail

Markwick Christopher (Medway PCT) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Apr 2010 20:50:04 +0100

97 lines

New Thread

User group lists was [ EMIS or SystmOne]

Re: User group lists was [ EMIS or SystmOne]

Simon Child <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Apr 2010 13:40:15 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

Weekly dispensing

Re: Weekly dispensing

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:35:49 +0100

58 lines

Re: Weekly dispensing

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:38:07 +0100

23 lines

Re: Weekly dispensing

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:39:08 +0100

18 lines

Re: Weekly dispensing

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:16:24 +0100

85 lines

Re: Weekly dispensing

Russell Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:26:51 +0100

350 lines

Re: Weekly dispensing

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:48:01 +0100

198 lines

Re: Weekly dispensing

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:51:22 -0400

326 lines

Re: Weekly dispensing

Dr Mark O'Connor <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:10:25 +0100

359 lines

JISCMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager