JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


March 2010


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

Airport Body Scanners (11 messages)
CCTV Images - SAR (1 message)
Changing the text of the Standard Model Contract Clauses (4 messages)
Chips in Bins (22 messages)
Chips in bins and dogs are only the start! (4 messages)
Council chiefs' Payoffs (1 message)
CSA (3 messages)
Email and Internet Monitoring Workshop (1 message)
Enforcement Notice against SAS Fire & Security Systems (1 message)
Error ???? (1 message)
FW: Hawktalk:Do local authorities spend nearly half a billion pounds on ineffective CCTV? (3 messages)
FW: NFI - A Query (2 messages)
Fw: [data-protection] Airport Body Scanners (1 message)
FW: [data-protection] NFI - A Query (1 message)
FYI: ICO changes - evidently (1 message)
FYI: Parliament wants the evidence that justifies the retention of DNA personal data (1 message)
Hate Register. (Was SE alerts) (4 messages)
Hawktalk: Government legalises excessive processing of personal data (again) and risks more ID theft (1 message)
Hawktalk: Sex offender disclosure procedure ignores data protection risk assessment (1 message)
Health Records Security (3 messages)
Here's an unusual breach (5 messages)
High Court case on disclosure of sensitive personal information - a trailblazer? (5 messages)
HSBC Data Theft (1 message)
Human Rights (1 message)
ICO Consultation (2 messages)
In celebration of PI's 20th birthday (1 message)
Injury lawyers (9 messages)
Job interview SAR (5 messages)
Legal liability data protection, privacy, identity theft - JISC Legal Webcast 2.00.pm 3 March (1 message)
Lord Ashchcroft (2 messages)
Medical Research - Contact without obtaining permission (10 messages)
Mobile Phone Spying (2 messages)
Naming FOI requestors (30 messages)
New CCTV Cameras (1 message)
New RIPA Codes (1 message)
New RIPA Orders passed (1 message)
NFI - A Query (3 messages)
NHS Summary Care Records (12 messages)
NHS Summary Care Records[Scanned] (6 messages)
NI Number (5 messages)
Notification of Specialist Schools (2 messages)
Offender locator in the uk? (3 messages)
Overseas transfers and Public Sector (6 messages)
Philosophically legal? (Was Re: [data-protection] SE alerts: The modern leper s bell?) (1 message)
Photos of Children (3 messages)
References (5 messages)
RIPA Conference (1 message)
SAR Precedents (1 message)
SE alerts (7 messages)
SE alerts: The modern leper s bell? (2 messages)
SE alerts: The modern leper's bell? (1 message)
Search suggestion functions and data protection (9 messages)
Student Union - use of national service for elections (1 message)
Subject Access Request - Complaints (7 messages)
To Share or Not to Share... (1 message)
Transfer of student marks to international home institution (1 message)
Transmission of Data to External Company for Cleaning (8 messages)
Virgin Mobile (au) failing to understand opt-in and opt-out (1 message)
web seminar recording (1 message)
Web Seminar This Morning 11am (1 message)
When is a sales cold call not a sales cold call? (2 messages)
When is a sales cold call not a sales cold call?[Scanned] (6 messages)
[Norton AntiSpam] Re: [data-protection] Transmission of Data to External Company for Cleaning (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

Airport Body Scanners

Airport Body Scanners

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:15:43 +0000

134 lines

Re: Airport Body Scanners

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:36:31 +0000

286 lines

Re: Airport Body Scanners

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:44:25 -0000

858 lines

Re: Airport Body Scanners

Wilson, Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:44:33 -0000

551 lines

Re: Airport Body Scanners

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:46:58 -0000

415 lines

Re: Airport Body Scanners

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:50:31 -0000

548 lines

Re: Airport Body Scanners

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:13:40 +0000

280 lines

Re: Airport Body Scanners

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:03:15 +0000

749 lines

Re: Airport Body Scanners

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:36:41 -0000

331 lines

Re: Airport Body Scanners

J.S.M.Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:29:24 -0000

563 lines

Re: Airport Body Scanners

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Mar 2010 09:43:09 +0000

48 lines

New Thread

CCTV Images - SAR

Re: CCTV Images - SAR

Judith Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:12:24 +0000

61 lines

New Thread

Changing the text of the Standard Model Contract Clauses

Changing the text of the Standard Model Contract Clauses

Clare Watts <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 11:55:03 +0000

55 lines

Re: Changing the text of the Standard Model Contract Clauses

Antoinette Carter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 12:03:06 -0000

100 lines

Re: Changing the text of the Standard Model Contract Clauses

C Oppenheim <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 12:24:59 +0000

132 lines

Re: Changing the text of the Standard Model Contract Clauses

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 09:01:05 -0500

421 lines

New Thread

Chips in Bins

Chips in Bins

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 08:08:46 +0000

126 lines

Re: Chips in Bins

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 14:55:16 -0000

561 lines

Re: Chips in Bins

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 15:20:58 +0000

704 lines

Re: Chips in Bins

Christine Catton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 16:09:19 +0000

536 lines

Chips in bins

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 16:09:08 -0000

312 lines

Re: Chips in bins

Kevin Tarleton (0161 923 6305) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 16:22:46 -0000

625 lines

Re: Chips in Bins

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 16:41:58 +0000

815 lines

Chips in bins

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 20:07:01 -0000

930 lines

Re: Chips in Bins

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Mar 2010 12:09:27 +0000

51 lines

Re: Chips in Bins

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Mar 2010 12:14:29 +0000

42 lines

Re: Chips in Bins

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 08:07:39 -0000

117 lines

Re: Chips in bins

Antoinette Carter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 15:27:08 -0000

374 lines

Re: Chips in bins

Harrison, Iain <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 15:35:46 -0000

581 lines

Re: Chips in bins

Mark van Harmelen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 15:49:27 +0000

554 lines

Re: Chips in bins

Harrison, Iain <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 15:58:59 -0000

857 lines

Re: Chips in bins

Antoinette Carter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 16:35:49 -0000

802 lines

Re: Chips in bins

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 20:45:29 +0000

45 lines

Re: Chips in bins

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 08:54:11 -0000

126 lines

Re: Chips in bins

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 09:29:59 +0000

367 lines

Re: Chips in bins

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 09:34:00 -0000

963 lines

Re: Chips in bins

Tony Brookes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 09:41:44 +0000

942 lines

Chips in bins

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 09:49:51 -0000

343 lines

New Thread

Chips in bins and dogs are only the start!

Chips in bins and dogs are only the start!

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:31:26 +0000

320 lines

Re: Chips in bins and dogs are only the start!

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:12:20 -0000

108 lines

Re: Chips in bins and dogs are only the start!

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:29:29 -0000

195 lines

Re: Chips in bins and dogs are only the start!

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:11:19 +0000

38 lines

New Thread

Council chiefs' Payoffs

Council chiefs' Payoffs

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 08:32:01 +0000

143 lines

New Thread

CSA

CSA

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:27:04 -0000

326 lines

Re: CSA

J.S.M.Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:43:44 -0000

334 lines

Re: CSA

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:47:45 -0000

370 lines

New Thread

Email and Internet Monitoring Workshop

Email and Internet Monitoring Workshop

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 08:15:51 +0000

53 lines

New Thread

Enforcement Notice against SAS Fire & Security Systems

Enforcement Notice against SAS Fire & Security Systems

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:40:48 +0000

108 lines

New Thread

Error ????

Error ????

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:00:23 -0000

648 lines

New Thread

FW: Hawktalk:Do local authorities spend nearly half a billion pounds on ineffective CCTV?

FW: Hawktalk:Do local authorities spend nearly half a billion pounds on ineffective CCTV?

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 19:03:56 -0000

382 lines

Re: FW: Hawktalk:Do local authorities spend nearly half a billion pounds on ineffective CCTV?

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 21:15:46 -0000

233 lines

Re: FW: Hawktalk:Do local authorities spend nearly half a billion pounds on ineffective CCTV?

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 21:20:03 -0000

235 lines

New Thread

FW: NFI - A Query

FW: NFI - A Query

DREW Nic <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 08:37:55 +0000

784 lines

Re: FW: NFI - A Query

Cotterill, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 09:00:35 -0000

949 lines

New Thread

Fw: [data-protection] Airport Body Scanners

Fw: [data-protection] Airport Body Scanners

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:11:49 +0000

598 lines

New Thread

FW: [data-protection] NFI - A Query

FW: [data-protection] NFI - A Query

Lee Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 08:32:20 -0000

752 lines

New Thread

FYI: ICO changes - evidently

FYI: ICO changes - evidently

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 18:18:04 -0000

568 lines

New Thread

FYI: Parliament wants the evidence that justifies the retention of DNA personal data

FYI: Parliament wants the evidence that justifies the retention of DNA personal data

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 07:42:09 -0000

43 lines

New Thread

Hate Register. (Was SE alerts)

Re: Hate Register. (Was SE alerts)

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 17:20:22 +0000

118 lines

Re: Hate Register. (Was SE alerts)

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 17:39:35 -0000

432 lines

Re: Hate Register. (Was SE alerts)

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 17:35:31 -0000

306 lines

Re: Hate Register. (Was SE alerts)

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 17:47:26 +0000

567 lines

New Thread

Hawktalk: Government legalises excessive processing of personal data (again) and risks more ID theft

Hawktalk: Government legalises excessive processing of personal data (again) and risks more ID theft

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Mar 2010 19:24:58 +0100

211 lines

New Thread

Hawktalk: Sex offender disclosure procedure ignores data protection risk assessment

Hawktalk: Sex offender disclosure procedure ignores data protection risk assessment

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:21:30 -0000

318 lines

New Thread

Health Records Security

Health Records Security

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:54:49 +0000

126 lines

Re: Health Records Security

Sara Owens <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:43:18 -0000

588 lines

Re: Health Records Security

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Mar 2010 09:50:05 +0000

59 lines

New Thread

Here's an unusual breach

Here's an unusual breach

Giles, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:55:30 -0000

251 lines

Re: Here's an unusual breach

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:03:54 -0000

597 lines

Re: Here's an unusual breach

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:17:10 +0000

675 lines

Re: Here's an unusual breach

Kevin Broadfoot <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:39:58 +0000

40 lines

Re: Here's an unusual breach

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:54:11 -0000

316 lines

New Thread

High Court case on disclosure of sensitive personal information - a trailblazer?

High Court case on disclosure of sensitive personal information - a trailblazer?

Bownes David (CEX) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:24:15 -0000

52 lines

Re: High Court case on disclosure of sensitive personal information - a trailblazer?

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:44:52 -0000

117 lines

Re: High Court case on disclosure of sensitive personal information - a trailblazer?

Chris Brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:13:32 -0700

176 lines

Re: High Court case on disclosure of sensitive personal information - a trailblazer?

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:18:55 -0000

175 lines

Re: High Court case on disclosure of sensitive personal information - a trailblazer?

Jonathan Baines <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:00:43 +0000

181 lines

New Thread

HSBC Data Theft

HSBC Data Theft

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Mar 2010 11:20:49 +0000

131 lines

New Thread

Human Rights

Human Rights

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 08:27:11 +0000

134 lines

New Thread

ICO Consultation

ICO Consultation

J.S.M.Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 11:08:04 +0100

237 lines

Re: ICO Consultation

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:29:05 +0100

335 lines

New Thread

In celebration of PI's 20th birthday

In celebration of PI's 20th birthday

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:28:26 -0000

260 lines

New Thread

Injury lawyers

Injury lawyers

Sara Owens <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 14:16:35 -0000

352 lines

Re: Injury lawyers

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 09:22:50 -0500

612 lines

Re: Injury lawyers

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 14:47:38 +0000

796 lines

Re: Injury lawyers

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 14:35:21 -0000

394 lines

Re: Injury lawyers

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 15:39:55 +0000

477 lines

Re: Injury lawyers

Chris Spray <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 22:37:28 -0000

695 lines

Re: Injury lawyers

Ward, Ciaran <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 09:46:03 +0000

542 lines

Re: Injury lawyers

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 10:07:31 +0000

533 lines

Re: Injury lawyers

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 05:08:37 -0500

697 lines

New Thread

Job interview SAR

Job interview SAR

Ward, Ciaran <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 11:16:56 +0000

350 lines

Re: Job interview SAR

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 16:57:01 -0000

389 lines

Re: Job interview SAR

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 16:48:09 -0500

830 lines

Re: Job interview SAR

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 09:56:46 -0000

235 lines

Re: Job interview SAR

Alan Stead <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 10:29:21 +0000

145 lines

New Thread

Legal liability data protection, privacy, identity theft - JISC Legal Webcast 2.00.pm 3 March

Legal liability data protection, privacy, identity theft - JISC Legal Webcast 2.00.pm 3 March

John X Kelly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 10:46:02 +0000

55 lines

New Thread

Lord Ashchcroft

Lord Ashchcroft

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Mar 2010 10:43:36 +0000

182 lines

Re: Lord Ashchcroft

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Mar 2010 20:18:49 -0000

659 lines

New Thread

Medical Research - Contact without obtaining permission

Medical Research - Contact without obtaining permission

Ruth Imeson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:29:44 +0000

118 lines

Re: Medical Research - Contact without obtaining permission

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:44:39 +0000

193 lines

Re: Medical Research - Contact without obtaining permission

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:35:59 -0000

563 lines

Re: Medical Research - Contact without obtaining permission

Mark van Harmelen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:11:47 +0000

556 lines

Re: Medical Research - Contact without obtaining permission

Sara Owens <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:54:19 -0000

725 lines

Re: Medical Research - Contact without obtaining permission

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:47:40 +0000

286 lines

Re: Medical Research - Contact without obtaining permission

Mark van Harmelen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:48:40 +0000

689 lines

Re: Medical Research - Contact without obtaining permission

J.S.M.Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:58:34 -0000

767 lines

Re: Medical Research - Contact without obtaining permission

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:02:30 -0000

797 lines

Re: Medical Research - Contact without obtaining permission

Ruth Imeson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:53:41 +0000

747 lines

New Thread

Mobile Phone Spying

Mobile Phone Spying

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 08:17:59 +0000

138 lines

Re: Mobile Phone Spying

Mark van Harmelen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 09:06:01 +0000

269 lines

New Thread

Naming FOI requestors

Naming FOI requestors

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:03:14 +0000

44 lines

Re: Naming FOI requestors

Suzy Ensor <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:15:42 +0000

89 lines

Re: Naming FOI requestors

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:22:16 -0000

167 lines

Re: Naming FOI requestors

Priestley Sarah <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:32:20 -0000

144 lines

Re: Naming FOI requestors

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:33:57 -0000

238 lines

Re: Naming FOI requestors

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:35:34 -0000

273 lines

Re: Naming FOI requestors

Ben Plouviez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:46:08 -0000

406 lines

Re: Naming FOI requestors

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:49:18 -0000

349 lines

Re: Naming FOI requestors

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:46:29 -0000

167 lines

Re: Naming FOI requestors

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:56:42 -0000

75 lines

Re: Naming FOI requestors

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:04:24 +0000

205 lines

Re: Naming FOI requestors

Cotterill, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:12:26 -0000

430 lines

Re: Naming FOI requestors

Cotterill, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:15:21 -0000

653 lines

Naming FOI requestors

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:17:37 -0000

30 lines

Re: Naming FOI requestors

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:18:11 -0000

72 lines

Re: Naming FOI requestors

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:21:29 +0000

76 lines

Re: Naming FOI requestors

J.S.M.Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:22:58 -0000

54 lines

Re: Naming FOI requestors

J.S.M.Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:28:35 -0000

49 lines

Re: Naming FOI requestors

Ben Plouviez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:52:36 -0000

603 lines

Re: Naming FOI requestors

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:41:11 -0000

182 lines

Re: Naming FOI requestors

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:43:13 -0000

214 lines

Re: Naming FOI requestors

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:03:00 +0000

123 lines

Re: Naming FOI requestors

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:16:34 +0000

43 lines

Re: Naming FOI requestors

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:23:13 +0000

482 lines

Re: Naming FOI requestors

David Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:15:47 +0000

55 lines

Re: Naming FOI requestors

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:00:21 +0000

137 lines

Re: Naming FOI requestors

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:05:12 -0000

139 lines

Re: Naming FOI requestors

Ben Plouviez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:54:32 -0000

279 lines

Re: Naming FOI requestors

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:03:16 +0000

43 lines

Re: Naming FOI requestors

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:56:17 -0000

342 lines

New Thread

New CCTV Cameras

New CCTV Cameras

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:19:20 +0000

121 lines

New Thread

New RIPA Codes

New RIPA Codes

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:22:44 +0000

49 lines

New Thread

New RIPA Orders passed

New RIPA Orders passed

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:39:38 +0000

138 lines

New Thread

NFI - A Query

NFI - A Query

Cotterill, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 15:05:08 -0000

195 lines

Re: NFI - A Query

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 19:41:47 -0000

636 lines

NFI - a query

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 08:28:55 -0000

348 lines

New Thread

NHS Summary Care Records

NHS Summary Care Records

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:12:15 +0000

163 lines

Re: NHS Summary Care Records

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:46:04 -0000

314 lines

Re: NHS Summary Care Records

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:55:06 -0000

112 lines

Re: NHS Summary Care Records

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:17:13 +0000

600 lines

Re: NHS Summary Care Records

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:20:49 +0000

356 lines

Re: NHS Summary Care Records

J.S.M.Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:29:01 -0000

576 lines

Re: NHS Summary Care Records

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:32:52 -0000

831 lines

Re: NHS Summary Care Records

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:52:43 +0000

548 lines

Re: NHS Summary Care Records

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Mar 2010 21:15:27 -0000

406 lines

Re: NHS Summary Care Records

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:44:40 +0100

178 lines

Re: NHS Summary Care Records

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 11:55:45 +0100

584 lines

Re: NHS Summary Care Records

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 12:03:09 +0100

519 lines

New Thread

NHS Summary Care Records[Scanned]

Re: NHS Summary Care Records[Scanned]

Ronan Durnin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:24:02 -0000

890 lines

Re: NHS Summary Care Records[Scanned]

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:42:13 +0000

881 lines

Re: NHS Summary Care Records[Scanned]

Ronan Durnin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:14:08 -0000

588 lines

Re: NHS Summary Care Records[Scanned]

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:12:40 -0000

861 lines

Re: NHS Summary Care Records[Scanned]

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:41:19 -0000

835 lines

Re: NHS Summary Care Records[Scanned]

J.S.M.Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:33:26 -0000

613 lines

New Thread

NI Number

NI Number

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:56:15 +0000

31 lines

Re: NI Number

DREW Nic <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:17:54 +0000

100 lines

Re: NI Number

David Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:18:56 +0000

99 lines

Re: NI Number

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:29:18 -0000

134 lines

Re: NI Number

Dunster, Jon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:54:24 -0000

132 lines

New Thread

Notification of Specialist Schools

Notification of Specialist Schools

Liz Sykes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 13:06:25 +0000

44 lines

Re: Notification of Specialist Schools

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 13:47:22 +0000

223 lines

New Thread

Offender locator in the uk?

Offender locator in the uk?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Mar 2010 07:02:29 +0000

62 lines

Re: Offender locator in the uk?

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:26:41 +0000

40 lines

Offender locator in the uk?

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:36:26 -0000

105 lines

New Thread

Overseas transfers and Public Sector

Overseas transfers and Public Sector

Kevin Broadfoot <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:25:02 +0000

37 lines

Re: Overseas transfers and Public Sector

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:34:14 -0000

94 lines

Re: Overseas transfers and Public Sector

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:50:14 -0000

87 lines

Re: Overseas transfers and Public Sector

Kevin Broadfoot <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:19:08 +0000

44 lines

Re: Overseas transfers and Public Sector

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:39:48 -0000

63 lines

Re: Overseas transfers and Public Sector

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:12:27 +0000

42 lines

New Thread

Philosophically legal? (Was Re: [data-protection] SE alerts: The modern leper s bell?)

Philosophically legal? (Was Re: [data-protection] SE alerts: The modern leper s bell?)

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 17:07:38 +0100

149 lines

New Thread

Photos of Children

Photos of Children

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:26:07 +0100

127 lines

Re: Photos of Children

Giles, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:43:16 +0100

697 lines

Re: Photos of Children

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:54:19 +0100

839 lines

New Thread

References

References

datap <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 09:12:07 +0000

151 lines

Re: References

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 10:10:43 -0000

93 lines

Re: References

Antoinette Carter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 14:34:42 -0000

324 lines

Re: References

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 15:18:02 -0000

385 lines

Re: References

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 16:04:28 -0000

235 lines

New Thread

RIPA Conference

RIPA Conference

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:39:44 +0100

144 lines

New Thread

SAR Precedents

SAR Precedents

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 10:24:13 +0000

34 lines

New Thread

SE alerts

SE alerts

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 06:50:39 +0000

125 lines

Re: SE alerts

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 08:23:48 +0000

285 lines

Re: SE alerts

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 10:18:16 -0000

542 lines

Re: SE alerts

Lee Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 10:23:56 -0000

330 lines

Re: SE alerts

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 10:51:44 +0000

486 lines

Re: SE alerts

Antoinette Carter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 13:41:58 -0000

534 lines

Re: SE alerts

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 16:44:13 +0000

39 lines

New Thread

SE alerts: The modern leper s bell?

Re: SE alerts: The modern leper s bell?

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 14:47:03 +0100

147 lines

Re: SE alerts: The modern leper s bell?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 20:20:38 +0000

54 lines

New Thread

SE alerts: The modern leper's bell?

Re: SE alerts: The modern leper's bell?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 11:51:31 +0000

375 lines

New Thread

Search suggestion functions and data protection

Search suggestion functions and data protection

Stock, Sara <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:05:17 +0000

276 lines

Re: Search suggestion functions and data protection

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:17:29 +0000

352 lines

Re: Search suggestion functions and data protection

Christine Catton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:58:55 +0000

357 lines

Re: Search suggestion functions and data protection

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:56:14 -0000

453 lines

Re: Search suggestion functions and data protection

Chris Brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:42:36 -0800

549 lines

Re: Search suggestion functions and data protection

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:58:36 -0000

479 lines

Re: Search suggestion functions and data protection

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:40:44 -0000

137 lines

Re: Search suggestion functions and data protection

Mark van Harmelen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:51:48 +0000

800 lines

Re: Search suggestion functions and data protection

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:56:42 -0000

55 lines

New Thread

Student Union - use of national service for elections

Student Union - use of national service for elections

Diana Bowie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 13:33:26 +0000

42 lines

New Thread

Subject Access Request - Complaints

Subject Access Request - Complaints

Ward, Ciaran <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:13:14 +0100

329 lines

Re: Subject Access Request - Complaints

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:30:50 +0100

576 lines

Re: Subject Access Request - Complaints

Wiper, Carl <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:43:18 +0100

693 lines

Re: Subject Access Request - Complaints

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:49:55 +0100

386 lines

Re: Subject Access Request - Complaints

Antoinette Carter <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 13:33:45 +0100

507 lines

Re: Subject Access Request - Complaints

Ward, Ciaran <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:33:19 +0100

619 lines

Re: Subject Access Request - Complaints

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:56:15 +0100

568 lines

New Thread

To Share or Not to Share...

To Share or Not to Share...

Tom Bown <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 08:39:01 +0100

51 lines

New Thread

Transfer of student marks to international home institution

Transfer of student marks to international home institution

Wendy Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:42:47 +0000

44 lines

New Thread

Transmission of Data to External Company for Cleaning

Transmission of Data to External Company for Cleaning

Ann-Marie Noble <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 16:58:31 -0000

194 lines

Re: Transmission of Data to External Company for Cleaning

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 18:04:36 +0000

358 lines

Re: Transmission of Data to External Company for Cleaning

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 18:12:56 +0000

495 lines

Re: Transmission of Data to External Company for Cleaning

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 13:26:16 -0500

738 lines

Re: Transmission of Data to External Company for Cleaning

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 18:32:27 +0000

716 lines

Re: Transmission of Data to External Company for Cleaning

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 13:30:50 +0100

119 lines

Re: Transmission of Data to External Company for Cleaning

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 12:42:54 +0000

378 lines

Re: Transmission of Data to External Company for Cleaning

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 14:00:30 +0000

522 lines

New Thread

Virgin Mobile (au) failing to understand opt-in and opt-out

Virgin Mobile (au) failing to understand opt-in and opt-out

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:40:39 +0000

32 lines

New Thread

web seminar recording

web seminar recording

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 16:21:13 +0000

96 lines

New Thread

Web Seminar This Morning 11am

Web Seminar This Morning 11am

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 09:02:36 +0000

161 lines

New Thread

When is a sales cold call not a sales cold call?

When is a sales cold call not a sales cold call?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:52:00 +0100

236 lines

Re: When is a sales cold call not a sales cold call?

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:20:03 +0100

370 lines

New Thread

When is a sales cold call not a sales cold call?[Scanned]

Re: When is a sales cold call not a sales cold call?[Scanned]

Ronan Durnin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:36:02 +0100

769 lines

Re: When is a sales cold call not a sales cold call?[Scanned]

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:46:43 +0100

624 lines

Re: When is a sales cold call not a sales cold call?[Scanned]

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:03:32 +0100

133 lines

Re: When is a sales cold call not a sales cold call?[Scanned]

Ronan Durnin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:15:31 +0100

512 lines

Re: When is a sales cold call not a sales cold call?[Scanned]

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:13:18 +0100

311 lines

Re: When is a sales cold call not a sales cold call?[Scanned]

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:47:46 +0100

553 lines

New Thread

[Norton AntiSpam] Re: [data-protection] Transmission of Data to External Company for Cleaning

Re: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: [data-protection] Transmission of Data to External Company for Cleaning

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 14:54:58 +0100

214 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is provided by Jisc

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager