|
|
Size
|
Re: new media arts
|
Sun, 28 Feb 2010 20:18:35 +1100 |
25 lines |
Re: new media arts
|
Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:19:55 +1100 |
73 lines |
Poetry reviews
|
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:25:35 -0500 |
32 lines |
Re: 3 poems
|
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:21:08 -0500 |
29 lines |
Re: new media arts
|
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:59:53 -0800 |
37 lines |
Re: lait snappe P £$£$£$£$£$ Thursday, 25 February 2010
|
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 10:28:27 +0000 |
127 lines |
Re: lait snappe P £$£$£$£$£$ Thursday, 25 February 2010
|
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 10:23:42 -0000 |
108 lines |
Re: lait snappe P £$£$£$£$£$ Thursday, 25 February 2010
|
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:32:19 +0000 |
87 lines |
Re: lait snappe P £$£$£$£$£$ Thursday, 25 February 2010
|
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 07:48:02 -0000 |
67 lines |
Re: lait snappe P £$£$£$£$£$ Thursday, 25 February 2010
|
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:19:49 -0800 |
41 lines |
Re: 3 poems
|
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:18:59 -0800 |
188 lines |
Re: snapshot
|
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:28:30 -0700 |
32 lines |
Re: 3 poems
|
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:48:59 -0500 |
45 lines |
[Fwd: Re: new media arts]
|
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:49:16 -0000 |
41 lines |
Re: new media arts
|
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:27:52 -0000 |
142 lines |
Re: Redirected Snap, Distance Montage
|
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:25:30 +0000 |
69 lines |
Re: snap snaP snAP sNAP SNAP SNAp SNap Snap
|
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:23:53 -0800 |
56 lines |
Re: new media arts
|
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:36:26 -0700 |
52 lines |
Re: Redirected Snap, Distance Montage
|
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:23:50 -0700 |
59 lines |
Re: snap snaP snAP sNAP SNAP SNAp SNap Snap
|
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:22:57 -0700 |
47 lines |
Re: Redirected Snap, Distance Montage
|
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:48:56 +0000 |
51 lines |
Re: new media arts
|
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:45:51 -0000 |
172 lines |
lait snappe P £$£$£$£$£$ Thursday, 25 February 2010
|
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:25:41 -0000 |
23 lines |
Re: snapshot
|
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:18:21 -0000 |
38 lines |
Re: snap snaP snAP sNAP SNAP SNAp SNap Snap
|
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:11:01 -0000 |
34 lines |
Re: new media arts
|
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:47:10 +1100 |
16 lines |
Re: new media arts
|
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 23:32:19 -0800 |
57 lines |
Re: new media arts
|
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 23:29:37 -0800 |
48 lines |
Re: new media arts
|
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:06:28 +1100 |
27 lines |
Re: new media arts
|
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:14:43 +1100 |
31 lines |
Re: Redirected Snap, Distance Montage
|
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:34:37 +1100 |
34 lines |
snap snaP snAP sNAP SNAP SNAp SNap Snap
|
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:49:44 -0800 |
18 lines |
Redirected Snap, Distance Montage
|
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 23:59:10 +0000 |
44 lines |
Re: 3 poems
|
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:14:32 +1100 |
15 lines |
Re: snap: a quiet lie-down
|
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:04:01 +1100 |
14 lines |
Re: snapshot
|
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 05:44:13 +0800 |
52 lines |
Re: snapshot
|
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:11:48 +1100 |
38 lines |
snapshot
|
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:53:25 -0700 |
21 lines |
Re: 3 poems
|
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:41:10 -0700 |
37 lines |
3 poems
|
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:47:14 -0500 |
170 lines |
A bit early
|
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:11:59 -0500 |
21 lines |
Re: new media arts
|
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:50:29 -0000 |
197 lines |
Re: new media arts
|
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:47:41 -0700 |
50 lines |
Re: snap: the wholly trinity
|
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:38:07 -0700 |
60 lines |
Re: pat snap _)¬¬""^^""¬¬( _ Wednesday, 24 February 2010
|
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:35:21 -0700 |
54 lines |
Re: snap
|
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:33:50 -0700 |
37 lines |
Re: snap: a quiet lie-down
|
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:32:57 -0700 |
39 lines |
Re: snap
|
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:56:50 -0000 |
27 lines |
Re: snap: a quiet lie-down
|
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:34:40 -0000 |
87 lines |
Re: new media arts
|
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:53:16 -0000 |
96 lines |
Re: snap
|
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 04:19:06 -0500 |
28 lines |
Re: snap: a quiet lie-down
|
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 04:12:23 -0500 |
90 lines |
snap: the wholly trinity
|
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:53:26 +0800 |
33 lines |
Re: snap: a quiet lie-down
|
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:44:42 +1100 |
39 lines |
Re: snap: a quiet lie-down
|
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:26:29 +0800 |
90 lines |
Re: pat snap _)¬¬""^^""¬¬( _ Wednesday, 24 February 2010
|
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 02:45:48 -0500 |
43 lines |
pat snap _)¬¬""^^""¬¬( _ Wednesday, 24 February 2010
|
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 07:37:25 -0000 |
26 lines |
new media arts
|
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:48:12 +1100 |
18 lines |
snap
|
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:57:16 +1100 |
12 lines |
snap: a quiet lie-down
|
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:37:01 +1100 |
72 lines |
Re: The desire to testify
|
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:47:15 -0700 |
66 lines |
Re: other poets
|
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:21:22 -0500 |
28 lines |
The desire to testify
|
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:00:29 -0000 |
36 lines |
Perth Poetry Club: Meg McKinlay 27 Feb. Tomas Ford 6 Mar. And more!
|
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:38:09 +0800 |
124 lines |
other poets
|
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:19:00 -0800 |
9 lines |
Re: landscape and politics
|
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:50:52 +1100 |
20 lines |
Re: British and Irish Poets List ban
|
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:44:35 +0000 |
135 lines |
Re: British and Irish Poets List ban
|
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 07:53:22 +1100 |
100 lines |
British and Irish Poets List ban
|
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 20:07:32 +0000 |
101 lines |
Re: landscape and politics
|
Sun, 21 Feb 2010 14:30:42 -0500 |
50 lines |
Re: art history status of photography
|
Sun, 21 Feb 2010 10:13:18 -0700 |
84 lines |
Re: landscape and politics
|
Sun, 21 Feb 2010 09:57:54 -0700 |
43 lines |
Re: in lieu of a snap
|
Sun, 21 Feb 2010 09:51:30 -0700 |
38 lines |
Re: art history status of photography
|
Sun, 21 Feb 2010 07:58:05 -0500 |
52 lines |
Re: Dorothy Porter article
|
Sun, 21 Feb 2010 03:52:58 -0500 |
73 lines |
Re: landscape and politics
|
Sun, 21 Feb 2010 19:47:07 +1100 |
12 lines |
art history status of photography
|
Sun, 21 Feb 2010 18:57:32 +1100 |
24 lines |
landscape and politics
|
Sun, 21 Feb 2010 18:45:27 +1100 |
13 lines |
dementia treatments
|
Sun, 21 Feb 2010 18:08:33 +1100 |
18 lines |
Re: Dorothy Porter article
|
Sun, 21 Feb 2010 17:51:54 +1100 |
19 lines |
Re: a little kid photographer
|
Sun, 21 Feb 2010 15:05:28 +1100 |
16 lines |
Re: a little kid photographer
|
Sat, 20 Feb 2010 18:33:59 -0500 |
97 lines |
Re: a little kid photographer
|
Sat, 20 Feb 2010 13:54:07 -0800 |
74 lines |
Re: Bar-B-Q part two...
|
Sun, 21 Feb 2010 08:21:46 +1100 |
20 lines |
Re: a little kid photographer
|
Sat, 20 Feb 2010 13:07:52 -0800 |
49 lines |
Re: Bar-B-Q part two...
|
Sun, 21 Feb 2010 08:05:39 +1100 |
16 lines |
Re: a little kid photographer
|
Sun, 21 Feb 2010 08:01:36 +1100 |
22 lines |
Re: Dorothy Porter article
|
Sat, 20 Feb 2010 09:52:21 -0700 |
59 lines |
Re: Well, & what do poets think?
|
Sat, 20 Feb 2010 16:18:06 +0000 |
125 lines |
Re: Well, & what do poets think?
|
Sat, 20 Feb 2010 09:16:55 -0700 |
52 lines |
Re: Dorothy Porter article
|
Sat, 20 Feb 2010 20:25:40 +0800 |
133 lines |
Re: Dorothy Porter article
|
Sat, 20 Feb 2010 20:18:56 +0800 |
115 lines |
Re: Dorothy Porter article
|
Sat, 20 Feb 2010 23:04:01 +1100 |
90 lines |
Re: Dorothy Porter article
|
Sat, 20 Feb 2010 17:07:31 +0800 |
72 lines |
Re: Dorothy Porter article
|
Sat, 20 Feb 2010 19:22:22 +1100 |
42 lines |
Re: in lieu of a snap
|
Sat, 20 Feb 2010 00:42:26 -0500 |
51 lines |
Re: Well, & what do poets think?
|
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 17:28:38 -0800 |
127 lines |
Dorothy Porter article
|
Sat, 20 Feb 2010 09:06:08 +0800 |
16 lines |
Re: Well, & what do poets think?
|
Sat, 20 Feb 2010 08:14:31 +0800 |
89 lines |
Re: Well, & what do poets think?
|
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:13:07 -0500 |
28 lines |
Re: Well, & what do poets think?
|
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:06:25 -0500 |
100 lines |
Re: Well, & what do poets think?
|
Sat, 20 Feb 2010 10:47:45 +1100 |
58 lines |
Re: in lieu of a snap
|
Sat, 20 Feb 2010 07:44:18 +0800 |
65 lines |
Re: late snap - thin)
|
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 21:26:30 +0000 |
76 lines |
late snap - thin
|
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 21:25:23 +0000 |
35 lines |
Well, & what do poets think?
|
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:06:42 -0700 |
31 lines |
Re: a little kid photographer
|
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:56:07 -0500 |
55 lines |
Re: Snap - Vincent
|
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:53:30 -0800 |
102 lines |
Re: in lieu of a snap
|
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:14:54 -0000 |
52 lines |
Re: Elif Batuman's THE POSSESSED
|
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:44:27 -0700 |
44 lines |
Re: A question of style
|
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:41:38 -0700 |
42 lines |
Re: late snap - thin)
|
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:37:07 +0000 |
50 lines |
Re: Bar-B-Q part two...
|
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:55:23 -0700 |
39 lines |
in lieu of a snap
|
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:44:38 -0700 |
35 lines |
Re: Snap - Vincent
|
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:38:20 -0700 |
78 lines |
Re: late snap - thin)
|
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:36:44 -0700 |
52 lines |
Re: Elif Batuman's THE POSSESSED
|
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 04:55:37 -0500 |
71 lines |
Re: A question of style
|
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 04:49:06 -0500 |
53 lines |
A question of style
|
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 17:55:23 +1100 |
35 lines |
Re: a little kid photographer
|
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 17:04:04 +1100 |
19 lines |
Snap - Vincent
|
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:38:04 -0800 |
51 lines |
Re: late snap - thin)
|
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:29:59 -0800 |
32 lines |
Re: late snap - thin)
|
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 20:27:00 -0000 |
43 lines |
late snap - thin)
|
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:59:18 +0000 |
28 lines |
Re: Contemporary Verse II, Winnipeg
|
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:28:20 -0000 |
190 lines |
Re: John Tranter interview and poems at The Argotist Online
|
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:06:46 +0000 |
68 lines |
Re: Contemporary Verse II, Winnipeg
|
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:54:14 -0700 |
113 lines |
At sixes and sevens?
|
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:13:02 -0600 |
26 lines |
Re: Elif Batuman's THE POSSESSED
|
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:10:59 -0700 |
45 lines |
Re: SNAP THAT HICKEY AGAIN
|
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:54:08 -0700 |
36 lines |
Re: John Tranter interview and poems at The Argotist Online
|
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:41:25 -0500 |
40 lines |
Re: John Tranter interview and poems at The Argotist Online
|
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:43:24 +0000 |
79 lines |
Contemporary Verse II, Winnipeg
|
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:48:45 -0000 |
62 lines |
Fwd: orphan works (between 25 and 50 million in the UK alone)
|
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:36:43 +1100 |
206 lines |
Re: Elif Batuman's THE POSSESSED
|
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:28:30 +1100 |
22 lines |
Re: Elif Batuman's THE POSSESSED
|
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:40:10 +1100 |
84 lines |
Elif Batuman's THE POSSESSED
|
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:36:24 -0500 |
66 lines |
Re: SNAP THAT HICKEY AGAIN
|
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 23:26:23 +0000 |
122 lines |
Re: website quick question
|
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:52:55 +1100 |
15 lines |
Re: SNAP THAT HICKEY AGAIN
|
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 13:04:47 -0800 |
93 lines |
SNAP THAT HICKEY AGAIN
|
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:56:37 +0000 |
68 lines |
Re: website quick question
|
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:41:02 -0800 |
25 lines |
Re: Prosaic snap of a sort
|
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:57:37 -0700 |
61 lines |
Re: lethargic snap
|
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:44:00 -0700 |
36 lines |
Re: snap: Clever dog!
|
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:39:34 -0700 |
36 lines |
Re: talking of Edmonton
|
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:38:27 -0700 |
37 lines |
Re: pat snap -=-="-"=-=- Wednesday, 17 February 2010
|
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:35:02 -0700 |
34 lines |
Re: pat snap -=-="-"=-=- Wednesday, 17 February 2010
|
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:23:03 -0000 |
80 lines |
Re: Prosaic snap of a sort
|
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:19:17 -0000 |
47 lines |
Re: Prosaic snap of a sort
|
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:17:02 -0500 |
30 lines |
Re: Prosaic snap of a sort
|
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 23:55:45 +0800 |
70 lines |
Re: Prosaic snap of a sort
|
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:21:43 -0500 |
48 lines |
Re: pat snap -=-="-"=-=- Wednesday, 17 February 2010
|
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:17:56 -0500 |
83 lines |
Prosaic snap of a sort
|
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:28:36 -0500 |
32 lines |
Hear Mags Webster and Nicolette Stasko (NSW) at Perth Poetry Club this Sat 20 Feb
|
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:25:47 +0800 |
95 lines |
lethargic snap
|
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 22:59:56 +1100 |
46 lines |
snap: Clever dog!
|
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:05:52 +0800 |
42 lines |
Re: pat snap -=-="-"=-=- Wednesday, 17 February 2010
|
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:54:04 +0800 |
65 lines |
talking of Edmonton
|
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 21:38:11 +1100 |
48 lines |
Re: pat snap -=-="-"=-=- Wednesday, 17 February 2010
|
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 10:34:27 -0000 |
68 lines |
Re: pat snap -=-="-"=-=- Wednesday, 17 February 2010
|
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 21:19:15 +1100 |
53 lines |
pat snap -=-="-"=-=- Wednesday, 17 February 2010
|
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:04:28 -0000 |
36 lines |
website quick question
|
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:23:02 +1100 |
12 lines |
Re: John Tranter interview and poems at The Argotist Online
|
Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:38:49 +0000 |
31 lines |
Re: a little kid photographer
|
Tue, 16 Feb 2010 18:55:28 +1100 |
22 lines |
Re: a little kid photographer / reading skills
|
Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:40:39 +1100 |
21 lines |
Re: a little kid photographer / reading skills
|
Tue, 16 Feb 2010 07:57:40 +1100 |
122 lines |
John Tranter interview and poems at The Argotist Online
|
Mon, 15 Feb 2010 21:29:47 +0100 |
15 lines |
Re: a little kid photographer / reading skills
|
Mon, 15 Feb 2010 13:39:57 -0600 |
97 lines |
Re: a little kid photographer / reading skills
|
Tue, 16 Feb 2010 06:24:14 +1100 |
68 lines |
Re: hard rain
|
Mon, 15 Feb 2010 08:50:07 -0700 |
36 lines |
Ewa Lipska
|
Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:13:57 +0800 |
17 lines |
a little kid photographer
|
Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:50:19 -0500 |
32 lines |
Bar-B-Q part two...
|
Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:05:07 +1100 |
182 lines |
Re: more B&W trivia
|
Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:10:38 +1100 |
20 lines |
more B&W trivia
|
Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:45:02 +1100 |
18 lines |
Re: hard rain
|
Sun, 14 Feb 2010 09:54:32 +0800 |
137 lines |
Re: hard rain
|
Sun, 14 Feb 2010 06:17:48 +1100 |
75 lines |
|
Sat, 13 Feb 2010 17:16:16 -0000 |
25 lines |
hard rain
|
Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:39:12 -0700 |
31 lines |
Re: about colour
|
Sat, 13 Feb 2010 19:35:17 +1100 |
19 lines |
|
Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:28:01 -0800 |
39 lines |
|
Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:45:57 -0000 |
26 lines |
Fwd: Curley, Heller, Kimmelman and Pines Reading on February 22nd
|
Fri, 12 Feb 2010 11:20:32 -0500 |
164 lines |
Re: about colour
|
Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:56:17 -0500 |
70 lines |
Re: about colour
|
Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:48:53 -0700 |
36 lines |
Re: about colour
|
Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:41:12 -0700 |
58 lines |
|
Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:38:13 -0700 |
38 lines |
Re: another photographer
|
Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:32:59 -0700 |
40 lines |
|
Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:26:12 +0200 |
16 lines |
Re: about colour
|
Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:12:06 +1100 |
28 lines |
|
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 22:04:05 -0800 |
9 lines |
another photographer
|
Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:29:12 +1100 |
13 lines |
Re: Modern Poetry Seminar
|
Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:48:26 +0800 |
101 lines |
Re: Snap - A 'missing letter' to Spicer
|
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:00:32 -0700 |
35 lines |
Fwd: Modern Poetry Seminar
|
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:00:50 -0500 |
92 lines |
Re: Snap - A 'missing letter' to Spicer
|
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:32:43 +0000 |
176 lines |
Re: Snap - A 'missing letter' to Spicer
|
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:05:58 -0800 |
137 lines |
Re: Snap - A 'missing letter' to Spicer
|
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 09:50:23 -0800 |
47 lines |
Re: Snap - A 'missing letter' to Spicer
|
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:17:17 +0000 |
123 lines |
Re: snap: the unfortunate tourist
|
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:57:30 -0700 |
48 lines |
Re: The Whole Island, Reading
|
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:55:23 -0700 |
37 lines |
Re: blog larfs
|
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:52:42 -0700 |
48 lines |
Re: snap: the unfortunate tourist
|
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 07:49:29 -0800 |
60 lines |
Re: more colour theory
|
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:43:58 -0700 |
42 lines |
Re: snap: the unfortunate tourist
|
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:33:20 -0700 |
35 lines |
Re: Snap - A 'missing letter' to Spicer
|
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:32:37 -0700 |
34 lines |
Re: The Whole Island, Reading
|
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:27:15 -0500 |
65 lines |
Re: Snap That Fallen Idol
|
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:21:08 -0700 |
34 lines |
Re: The Whole Island, Reading
|
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:17:37 -0700 |
47 lines |
blog larfs
|
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:00:03 +0800 |
19 lines |
Re: Snap (this time)
|
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 09:43:07 -0000 |
201 lines |
Re: more colour theory
|
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:23:28 +1100 |
23 lines |
Re: more colour theory
|
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:59:13 +1100 |
18 lines |
more colour theory
|
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:47:46 +1100 |
17 lines |
Snap (expansion) - A 'missing letter' to Spicer
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:18:12 -0800 |
70 lines |
Re: Snap - A 'missing letter' to Spicer
|
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:44:02 +0800 |
80 lines |
Re: Snap (this time)
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:48:26 +0000 |
177 lines |
Re: snap: the unfortunate tourist
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:32:14 -0000 |
54 lines |
Re: Snap (this time)
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:28:25 -0000 |
162 lines |
Snap - A 'missing letter' to Spicer
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:26:38 -0800 |
65 lines |
Re: poems
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:13:40 -0500 |
27 lines |
Re: Snap (this time)
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:05:16 -0800 |
132 lines |
Snap That Fallen Idol
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:37:51 +0000 |
29 lines |
Re: Snap (this time)
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:29:52 +0000 |
102 lines |
Re: Snap (this time)
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:22:25 -0800 |
78 lines |
Re: Family Snapshot
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:04:26 +0000 |
39 lines |
Re: Snap (this time)
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:02:44 +0000 |
61 lines |
Re: happy birthday, Dave
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:00:55 +0000 |
54 lines |
Re: The Whole Island, Reading
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:59:15 -0500 |
69 lines |
Re: The Whole Island, Reading
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:28:16 -0700 |
36 lines |
Re: Andrew's zimmer?
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:19:27 -0700 |
34 lines |
snap: the unfortunate tourist
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:17:45 -0700 |
38 lines |
Re: poems
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:11:14 -0700 |
31 lines |
Re: unsubscribe
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:46:00 +0000 |
30 lines |
Notice: Mudlark
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:43:41 -0500 |
30 lines |
Re: happy birthday, Dave
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:13:29 -0800 |
31 lines |
Re: judy discombobulated
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:28:09 -0800 |
64 lines |
Re: happy birthday, Dave
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:21:23 -0800 |
68 lines |
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:06:01 -0800 |
46 lines |
unsubscribe
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:54:19 -0700 |
10 lines |
Re: Snap (found object, avoiding the French)
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:53:32 -0700 |
46 lines |
Re: Snap (found object, avoiding the French)
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:51:31 -0700 |
36 lines |
Re: Family Snapshot
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:50:07 -0700 |
35 lines |
Re: poems
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:44:02 -0500 |
29 lines |
Re: pat snap- )))"!"!"!"!"(((-Wednesday, 10 February 2010
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:37:16 -0800 |
50 lines |
Re: pat snap- )))"!"!"!"!"(((-Wednesday, 10 February 2010
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:35:15 -0000 |
89 lines |
Re: Snap-in-time: "Adhesions"
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:33:45 -0700 |
36 lines |
Re: Snap (this time)
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:32:29 -0800 |
41 lines |
Re: The Whole Island, Reading
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:23:56 -0500 |
70 lines |
Re: The Whole Island, Reading
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:12:46 -0700 |
58 lines |
Re: judy discombobulated
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:11:51 -0700 |
44 lines |
Re: happy birthday, Dave
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:00:13 -0700 |
42 lines |
Re: snap: the other side
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:59:18 -0700 |
36 lines |
Re: Family Snapshot
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:40:38 -0500 |
85 lines |
Re: Snap-in-time: "Adhesions"
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:29:48 -0500 |
20 lines |
Unsubscribe
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:03:51 +0000 |
9 lines |
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:05:04 +0000 |
35 lines |
Re: Family Snapshot
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:01:25 +0000 |
22 lines |
Re: judy discombobulated
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:30:14 -0000 |
132 lines |
Re: judy discombobulated
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:25:41 +0000 |
114 lines |
Re: Snap-in-time: "Adhesions"
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:23:38 -0000 |
73 lines |
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:05:51 -0000 |
40 lines |
Re: Family Snapshot
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:00:23 -0000 |
87 lines |
Re: judy discombobulated
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:55:47 -0000 |
93 lines |
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:47:35 +0000 |
44 lines |
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:26:05 +0800 |
24 lines |
Re: pat snap- )))"!"!"!"!"(((-Wednesday, 10 February 2010
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:17:36 +0800 |
73 lines |
Re: Family Snapshot
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:12:24 +0800 |
84 lines |
Re: pat snap- )))"!"!"!"!"(((-Wednesday, 10 February 2010
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:10:47 +0000 |
54 lines |
Snap (this time)
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:08:48 +0000 |
26 lines |
pat snap- )))"!"!"!"!"(((-Wednesday, 10 February 2010
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:46:46 -0000 |
36 lines |
Re: Snap (found object, avoiding the French)
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:18:48 +0000 |
75 lines |
Re: poems
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:15:55 +1100 |
19 lines |
Re: Snap (found object, avoiding the French)
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:11:18 +0000 |
58 lines |
Re: Family Snapshot
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:01:29 +0000 |
70 lines |
Re: Snap (found object, avoiding the French)
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:59:55 +0000 |
103 lines |
Re: Snap (found object, avoiding the French)
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:51:26 +0000 |
81 lines |
Re: Snap (found object, avoiding the French)
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:41:40 +0000 |
60 lines |
Snap (found object, avoiding the French)
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:30:33 +0000 |
34 lines |
Family Snapshot
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:26:12 +0000 |
53 lines |
Re: happy birthday, Dave
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 06:41:18 +0000 |
134 lines |
Re: happy birthday, Dave
|
Tue, 9 Feb 2010 21:44:12 -0800 |
101 lines |
Re: happy birthday, Dave
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:33:18 +0000 |
81 lines |
Snap-in-time: "Adhesions"
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:12:19 -0500 |
57 lines |
The Whole Island, Reading
|
Tue, 9 Feb 2010 23:05:40 -0500 |
31 lines |
Re: snap: the other side
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:21:17 +0800 |
70 lines |
poems
|
Tue, 9 Feb 2010 20:56:07 -0500 |
337 lines |
Re: judy discombobulated
|
Tue, 9 Feb 2010 17:01:52 -0800 |
103 lines |
Re: about colour
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:52:22 +1100 |
48 lines |
Re: judy discombobulated
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:42:43 +1100 |
76 lines |
Re: judy discombobulated
|
Tue, 9 Feb 2010 16:31:24 -0800 |
22 lines |
Re: judy discombobulated
|
Tue, 9 Feb 2010 16:29:32 -0800 |
54 lines |
Re: happy birthday, Dave
|
Tue, 9 Feb 2010 16:23:11 -0800 |
56 lines |
Re: happy birthday, Dave
|
Tue, 9 Feb 2010 16:20:24 -0800 |
50 lines |
Re: about colour
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:51:37 +1100 |
33 lines |
snap: the other side
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:46:18 +1100 |
35 lines |
Re: judy discombobulated
|
Tue, 9 Feb 2010 21:07:52 +0000 |
77 lines |
Re: judy discombobulated
|
Tue, 9 Feb 2010 14:07:04 -0700 |
36 lines |
Re: happy birthday, Dave
|
Tue, 9 Feb 2010 21:06:25 +0000 |
169 lines |
Re: happy birthday, Dave
|
Tue, 9 Feb 2010 14:04:21 -0700 |
39 lines |
Re: judy discombobulated
|
Tue, 9 Feb 2010 13:02:11 -0800 |
53 lines |
Re: about colour
|
Tue, 9 Feb 2010 13:36:14 -0700 |
66 lines |
Re: about colour
|
Tue, 9 Feb 2010 13:34:33 -0700 |
68 lines |
judy discombobulated
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 06:50:14 +1100 |
26 lines |
Re: happy birthday, Dave
|
Tue, 9 Feb 2010 05:07:44 -0800 |
129 lines |
Re: she professes disasters
|
Tue, 9 Feb 2010 09:44:24 -0000 |
40 lines |
Violent femme CORAL CARTER at Perth Poetry Club this Sat 13 Feb
|
Tue, 9 Feb 2010 16:00:06 +0800 |
93 lines |
Re: happy birthday, Dave
|
Tue, 9 Feb 2010 07:32:36 +0000 |
94 lines |
Re: about colour
|
Tue, 9 Feb 2010 18:27:51 +1100 |
56 lines |
Re: about colour
|
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 18:54:39 -0800 |
138 lines |
Re: about colour
|
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 21:43:43 -0500 |
111 lines |
Re: about colour
|
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 21:34:12 -0500 |
47 lines |
Re: about colour
|
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 17:45:45 -0800 |
102 lines |
Re: about colour
|
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 17:33:44 -0800 |
80 lines |
Re: happy birthday, Dave
|
Tue, 9 Feb 2010 12:09:05 +1100 |
66 lines |
Re: about colour
|
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 20:08:52 -0500 |
72 lines |
about colour
|
Tue, 9 Feb 2010 11:42:45 +1100 |
33 lines |
Re: happy birthday, Dave
|
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 16:39:21 -0800 |
53 lines |
Re: happy birthday, Dave
|
Tue, 9 Feb 2010 00:11:40 +0000 |
42 lines |
Re: the sin-eater
|
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 18:00:17 -0500 |
63 lines |
Re: happy birthday, Dave
|
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 22:36:20 +0000 |
17 lines |
Re: she professes disasters
|
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 15:23:01 -0700 |
65 lines |
Re: happy birthday, Dave
|
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 15:21:54 -0700 |
48 lines |
Re: she professes disasters
|
Tue, 9 Feb 2010 06:12:48 +0800 |
39 lines |
she professes disasters
|
Tue, 9 Feb 2010 09:02:08 +1100 |
26 lines |
Re: happy birthday, Dave
|
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 21:57:46 -0000 |
41 lines |
Re: the sin-eater
|
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 21:54:07 -0000 |
50 lines |
happy birthday, Dave
|
Tue, 9 Feb 2010 08:27:54 +1100 |
23 lines |
Re: the sin-eater
|
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 16:21:04 -0500 |
33 lines |
Re: the sin-eater
|
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 21:00:37 +0000 |
141 lines |
Re: the sin-eater
|
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 20:56:54 +0000 |
18 lines |
Re: the sin-eater
|
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 20:50:14 -0000 |
154 lines |
Re: the sin-eater
|
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 14:12:32 -0500 |
91 lines |
Re: the sin-eater
|
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 10:53:01 -0800 |
119 lines |
Re: the sin-eater
|
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 10:41:54 -0800 |
92 lines |
Re: the sin-eater
|
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 18:09:34 +0000 |
38 lines |
Re: the sin-eater
|
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 16:57:52 -0000 |
103 lines |
Re: the sin-eater
|
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 11:37:31 -0500 |
40 lines |
Re: bog update
|
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 08:49:27 -0700 |
47 lines |
Re: the sin-eater
|
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 08:43:35 -0700 |
77 lines |
Re: the sin-eater
|
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 08:50:01 -0500 |
71 lines |
Re: the sin-eater
|
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 08:39:22 -0500 |
58 lines |
get "published" online...
|
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 03:46:19 -0700 |
44 lines |
Re: the sin-eater
|
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 10:39:22 +0000 |
67 lines |
Re: the sin-eater
|
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 20:25:08 +1100 |
19 lines |
Re: the sin-eater
|
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 20:12:58 +1100 |
19 lines |
Re: the sin-eater
|
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 19:59:36 +1100 |
70 lines |
Re: the sin-eater
|
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 08:28:36 -0000 |
48 lines |
Re: the sin-eater
|
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 08:06:15 +0000 |
39 lines |
Re: the sin-eater
|
Sun, 7 Feb 2010 23:10:09 -0800 |
25 lines |
Re: the sin-eater
|
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 18:05:04 +1100 |
19 lines |
Re: the sin-eater
|
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 17:14:13 +1100 |
34 lines |
Re: the sin-eater
|
Sun, 7 Feb 2010 21:38:02 -0800 |
64 lines |
bog update
|
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 16:31:39 +1100 |
18 lines |
semiotic bullshit
|
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 15:44:32 +1100 |
103 lines |
Going for Baroque
|
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 15:35:40 +1100 |
33 lines |
Re: the sin-eater
|
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 15:02:25 +1100 |
42 lines |
the sin-eater
|
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 14:54:04 +1100 |
34 lines |
Re: Bush Slam poem
|
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 11:07:21 +1100 |
29 lines |
Re: Bush Slam poem
|
Sun, 7 Feb 2010 17:29:15 -0000 |
88 lines |
Re: Bush Slam poem
|
Sun, 7 Feb 2010 09:48:39 -0700 |
73 lines |
Re: Bush Slam poem
|
Sun, 7 Feb 2010 18:27:32 +1100 |
22 lines |
Re: Photoshop question
|
Sat, 6 Feb 2010 23:13:03 -0800 |
14 lines |
Re: Bush Slam poem
|
Sun, 7 Feb 2010 18:12:28 +1100 |
52 lines |
Re: Photoshop question
|
Sun, 7 Feb 2010 17:59:16 +1100 |
20 lines |
Re: Photoshop question
|
Sat, 6 Feb 2010 22:27:33 -0800 |
64 lines |
Re: Photoshop question
|
Sat, 6 Feb 2010 22:22:17 -0800 |
55 lines |
Re: Photoshop question
|
Sat, 6 Feb 2010 22:17:25 -0800 |
49 lines |
Re: Photoshop question
|
Sat, 6 Feb 2010 22:00:15 -0800 |
34 lines |
Re: Photoshop question
|
Sun, 7 Feb 2010 16:58:11 +1100 |
29 lines |
Re: Bush Slam poem
|
Sun, 7 Feb 2010 15:45:46 +1100 |
38 lines |
Re: Bush Slam poem
|
Sat, 6 Feb 2010 09:09:46 -0700 |
53 lines |
Re: Bush Slam poem
|
Sat, 6 Feb 2010 09:02:45 -0700 |
47 lines |
Re: Bush Slam poem
|
Sat, 6 Feb 2010 19:11:22 +1100 |
85 lines |
Re: How To Write A Chinese Poem
|
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 20:50:37 -0800 |
216 lines |
Re: How To Write A Chinese Poem
|
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 18:29:47 -0800 |
185 lines |
Re: How To Write A Chinese Poem
|
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 18:27:30 -0800 |
175 lines |
Re: How To Write A Chinese Poem
|
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 21:25:22 -0500 |
153 lines |
Re: How To Write A Chinese Poem
|
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 18:24:10 -0800 |
129 lines |
Re: How To Write A Chinese Poem
|
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 21:19:51 -0500 |
107 lines |
Re: Photoshop question
|
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 18:00:53 -0800 |
18 lines |
Re: Bush Slam poem
|
Sat, 6 Feb 2010 12:49:41 +1100 |
52 lines |
Re: Bush Slam poem
|
Sat, 6 Feb 2010 09:05:43 +0800 |
35 lines |
Re: How To Write A Chinese Poem
|
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 16:55:09 -0800 |
87 lines |
Re: How To Write A Chinese Poem
|
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 19:44:02 -0500 |
72 lines |
Re: Bush Slam poem
|
Sat, 6 Feb 2010 08:42:44 +0800 |
35 lines |
Re: How To Write A Chinese Poem
|
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 16:13:55 -0800 |
56 lines |
Bush Slam poem
|
Sat, 6 Feb 2010 10:59:02 +1100 |
17 lines |
Re: How To Write A Chinese Poem
|
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 15:14:28 -0800 |
26 lines |
Re: How To Write A Chinese Poem
|
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 23:09:26 +0000 |
15 lines |
Re: How To Write A Chinese Poem
|
Sat, 6 Feb 2010 06:36:50 +0800 |
33 lines |
Re: How To Write A Chinese Poem
|
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 12:41:18 -0800 |
51 lines |
Re: How To Write A Chinese Poem
|
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 14:31:37 -0500 |
35 lines |
How To Write A Chinese Poem
|
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 11:00:11 -0800 |
18 lines |
Re: um, my reading
|
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 18:05:04 -0000 |
68 lines |
Re: Cinese poem, very famous
|
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 09:49:15 -0700 |
43 lines |
Re: Jacket magazine: An Announcement from John Tranter and Al Filreis
|
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 09:42:17 -0700 |
39 lines |
Re: um, my reading
|
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 09:34:46 -0700 |
39 lines |
Re: um, my reading
|
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 09:33:14 -0700 |
47 lines |
Re: um, my reading
|
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 09:30:35 -0700 |
80 lines |
Recent NOMADICS blog posts
|
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 08:37:24 -0500 |
46 lines |
Re: Cinese poem, very famous
|
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 11:52:40 +0000 |
122 lines |
Re: Cinese poem, very famous
|
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 11:33:38 +0000 |
159 lines |
Re: Cinese poem, very famous
|
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 11:28:13 +0000 |
119 lines |
Re: Cinese poem, very famous
|
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 11:27:27 -0000 |
128 lines |
Re: 'Chernobyl in the Amazon'
|
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 11:22:58 -0000 |
40 lines |
Re: Cinese poem, very famous
|
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 11:22:01 +0000 |
39 lines |
Re: Cinese poem, very famous
|
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 11:13:14 +0000 |
107 lines |
Re: Cinese poem, very famous
|
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 10:48:52 -0000 |
80 lines |
Re: Cinese poem, very famous
|
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 10:41:34 -0000 |
94 lines |
Re: Cinese poem, very famous
|
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 20:38:27 +1100 |
20 lines |
Re: Cinese poem, very famous
|
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 09:19:04 +0000 |
65 lines |
"Chernobyl in the Amazon"
|
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 11:18:54 +0200 |
11 lines |
Re: Photoshop question
|
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 19:36:15 +1100 |
14 lines |
Quoting Caravaggio
|
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 19:27:10 +1100 |
21 lines |
Re: Photoshop question
|
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 18:42:40 +1100 |
14 lines |
Re: Photoshop question
|
Thu, 4 Feb 2010 22:46:04 -0800 |
58 lines |
Re: Photoshop question
|
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 17:02:24 +1100 |
23 lines |
Jacket magazine: An Announcement from John Tranter and Al Filreis
|
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 14:52:04 +1100 |
95 lines |
Re: Photoshop question
|
Thu, 4 Feb 2010 19:51:54 -0800 |
49 lines |
Re: Photoshop question
|
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 14:25:49 +1100 |
27 lines |
Re: Photoshop question
|
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 14:08:20 +1100 |
34 lines |
Re: um, my reading
|
Thu, 4 Feb 2010 18:41:31 -0500 |
52 lines |
Re: um, my reading
|
Thu, 4 Feb 2010 18:26:55 -0500 |
106 lines |
Re: um, my reading
|
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 10:13:11 +1100 |
29 lines |
Re: um, my reading
|
Thu, 4 Feb 2010 22:47:46 +0000 |
81 lines |
Re: um, my reading
|
Thu, 4 Feb 2010 15:27:41 -0500 |
52 lines |
Re: Snap That Hickey
|
Thu, 4 Feb 2010 20:25:37 +0000 |
92 lines |
um, my reading
|
Thu, 4 Feb 2010 11:54:55 -0700 |
37 lines |
Re: Photoshop question
|
Thu, 4 Feb 2010 09:34:49 -0800 |
29 lines |
Re: Cinese poem, very famous
|
Thu, 4 Feb 2010 17:00:07 -0000 |
39 lines |
[Fwd: Readings 5 webjournal is now online]
|
Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:40:46 -0000 |
35 lines |
Hamilton Stone Review #20 now online
|
Thu, 4 Feb 2010 10:36:49 -0600 |
33 lines |
Re: really, just a b/w snapshot
|
Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:10:05 -0000 |
54 lines |
really, just a b/w snapshot
|
Thu, 4 Feb 2010 08:55:18 -0700 |
38 lines |
Re: Snap That Hickey
|
Thu, 4 Feb 2010 08:27:58 -0700 |
59 lines |
Re: monochrome photography
|
Thu, 4 Feb 2010 10:25:03 +0000 |
36 lines |
Re: Photoshop question
|
Thu, 4 Feb 2010 20:58:49 +1100 |
52 lines |
Re: 2010 03 feb snapshot -- first try
|
Thu, 4 Feb 2010 09:30:15 -0000 |
122 lines |
Re: Photoshop question
|
Thu, 4 Feb 2010 20:28:27 +1100 |
15 lines |
Re: monochrome photography
|
Thu, 4 Feb 2010 20:16:13 +1100 |
14 lines |
Re: ubuntu studio
|
Thu, 4 Feb 2010 20:05:39 +1100 |
14 lines |
Re: Photoshop question
|
Thu, 4 Feb 2010 00:38:49 -0800 |
45 lines |
Re: monochrome photography
|
Thu, 4 Feb 2010 08:27:53 +0000 |
64 lines |
Re: ubuntu studio
|
Thu, 4 Feb 2010 00:17:46 -0800 |
19 lines |
Re: Photoshop question
|
Thu, 4 Feb 2010 00:17:14 -0800 |
33 lines |
Re: ubuntu studio
|
Thu, 4 Feb 2010 19:13:19 +1100 |
15 lines |
Re: Photoshop question
|
Thu, 4 Feb 2010 19:11:31 +1100 |
17 lines |
Re: ubuntu studio
|
Thu, 4 Feb 2010 00:08:29 -0800 |
29 lines |
Re: Photoshop question
|
Thu, 4 Feb 2010 00:04:27 -0800 |
65 lines |
Re: ubuntu studio
|
Thu, 4 Feb 2010 18:59:03 +1100 |
20 lines |
Re: Photoshop question
|
Thu, 4 Feb 2010 18:36:22 +1100 |
17 lines |
Re: ubuntu studio
|
Wed, 3 Feb 2010 23:32:39 -0800 |
21 lines |
Re: Photoshop question
|
Wed, 3 Feb 2010 23:23:00 -0800 |
20 lines |
ubuntu studio
|
Thu, 4 Feb 2010 18:19:05 +1100 |
16 lines |
Photoshop question
|
Thu, 4 Feb 2010 17:55:54 +1100 |
15 lines |
Re: monochrome photography
|
Thu, 4 Feb 2010 17:41:22 +1100 |
40 lines |
Re: Snap That Hickey
|
Thu, 4 Feb 2010 02:00:01 +0000 |
65 lines |
Re: Snap That Hickey
|
Wed, 3 Feb 2010 15:51:12 -0800 |
45 lines |
Snap That Hickey
|
Wed, 3 Feb 2010 23:13:43 +0000 |
32 lines |
query
|
Wed, 3 Feb 2010 17:52:19 -0500 |
28 lines |
2010 03 feb snapshot -- first try
|
Wed, 3 Feb 2010 12:03:45 -0700 |
105 lines |
Re: pat snap _-|\|\|/|/|-_Wednesday, 03 February 2010
|
Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:43:22 -0700 |
36 lines |
Re: snap: the leash
|
Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:41:01 -0700 |
39 lines |
Re: pat snap _-|\|\|/|/|-_Wednesday, 03 February 2010
|
Wed, 3 Feb 2010 22:21:53 +0800 |
69 lines |
Re: pat snap _-|\|\|/|/|-_Wednesday, 03 February 2010
|
Wed, 3 Feb 2010 13:35:45 -0000 |
51 lines |
Re: pat snap _-|\|\|/|/|-_Wednesday, 03 February 2010
|
Wed, 3 Feb 2010 14:40:12 +0200 |
31 lines |
pat snap _-|\|\|/|/|-_Wednesday, 03 February 2010
|
Wed, 3 Feb 2010 08:59:38 -0000 |
24 lines |
Re: snap: the leash
|
Wed, 3 Feb 2010 08:54:33 -0000 |
58 lines |
Re: snap: the leash
|
Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:22:58 +0800 |
83 lines |
Re: Film
|
Wed, 3 Feb 2010 11:22:03 +1100 |
81 lines |
Re: snap: the leash
|
Tue, 2 Feb 2010 16:11:34 -0800 |
59 lines |
snap: the leash
|
Wed, 3 Feb 2010 10:17:15 +1100 |
41 lines |
Re: Film
|
Tue, 2 Feb 2010 22:47:32 +0000 |
64 lines |
Re: Film
|
Wed, 3 Feb 2010 06:23:48 +0800 |
42 lines |
Film
|
Tue, 2 Feb 2010 22:15:55 +0000 |
27 lines |
Re: Poetryetc Featured Poet
|
Tue, 2 Feb 2010 16:47:33 -0500 |
51 lines |
Re: monochrome photography
|
Tue, 2 Feb 2010 14:07:29 -0700 |
39 lines |
Re: Poetryetc Featured Poet
|
Tue, 2 Feb 2010 13:59:07 -0700 |
35 lines |
Re: Poetryetc Featured Poet
|
Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:40:34 -0500 |
60 lines |
Re: Poetryetc Featured Poet
|
Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:03:31 -0700 |
40 lines |
Re: A little funny share :)
|
Tue, 2 Feb 2010 08:59:07 -0700 |
52 lines |
Re: H'm
|
Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:13:09 -0500 |
68 lines |
Re: Poetryetc Featured Poet
|
Tue, 2 Feb 2010 08:40:29 -0500 |
58 lines |
H'm
|
Tue, 2 Feb 2010 12:40:48 +0000 |
23 lines |
Re: monochrome photography
|
Tue, 2 Feb 2010 12:23:05 +0000 |
37 lines |
Fwd: A little funny share :)
|
Tue, 2 Feb 2010 20:01:14 +0800 |
29 lines |
Re: Poetryetc Featured Poet
|
Tue, 2 Feb 2010 03:56:17 -0800 |
34 lines |
Re: monochrome photography
|
Tue, 2 Feb 2010 19:47:48 +1100 |
16 lines |
Re: monochrome photography
|
Tue, 2 Feb 2010 08:38:23 +0000 |
113 lines |
Re: monochrome photography
|
Tue, 2 Feb 2010 18:25:22 +1100 |
16 lines |
Re: monochrome photography
|
Tue, 2 Feb 2010 18:14:07 +1100 |
91 lines |
Re: poem for review
|
Mon, 1 Feb 2010 20:53:20 -0800 |
216 lines |
Dynamic performers INDIGO (SA) + THE SIEGE this Sat 6 Feb at Perth Poetry Club
|
Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:20:05 +0800 |
105 lines |
unsubscribe
|
Mon, 1 Feb 2010 16:37:38 -0800 |
1887 lines |
Re: Poetryetc Featured Poet
|
Mon, 1 Feb 2010 19:03:32 -0500 |
59 lines |
Re: Poetryetc Featured Poet
|
Mon, 1 Feb 2010 19:00:42 -0500 |
54 lines |
Re: Poetryetc Featured Poet
|
Mon, 1 Feb 2010 18:58:00 -0500 |
64 lines |
Re: Poetryetc Featured Poet
|
Mon, 1 Feb 2010 18:54:46 -0500 |
42 lines |
Re: Poetryetc Featured Poet
|
Mon, 1 Feb 2010 18:52:09 -0500 |
43 lines |
Re: SNAP THAT MASH-UP
|
Mon, 1 Feb 2010 08:38:34 -0700 |
50 lines |
Re: Poetryetc Featured Poet
|
Mon, 1 Feb 2010 08:36:30 -0700 |
42 lines |
Re: East Asian painting
|
Mon, 1 Feb 2010 08:27:05 -0700 |
39 lines |
Re: poem for review
|
Mon, 1 Feb 2010 21:51:36 +0800 |
42 lines |
Re: poem for review
|
Mon, 1 Feb 2010 23:19:49 +1100 |
27 lines |
Re: Robert Frost poem
|
Mon, 1 Feb 2010 09:27:56 +0000 |
73 lines |
Re: Poetryetc Featured Poet
|
Mon, 1 Feb 2010 09:12:54 +0000 |
34 lines |
blue monochrome
|
Mon, 1 Feb 2010 20:11:54 +1100 |
14 lines |
Re: Robert Frost poem
|
Mon, 1 Feb 2010 16:50:49 +0800 |
63 lines |
Re: poem for review
|
Mon, 1 Feb 2010 08:26:16 -0000 |
208 lines |
Re: poem for review
|
Mon, 1 Feb 2010 08:19:51 -0000 |
159 lines |
Re: iPad
|
Mon, 1 Feb 2010 15:43:43 +0800 |
31 lines |
Re: poem for review
|
Sun, 31 Jan 2010 20:50:45 -0800 |
196 lines |
Robert Frost poem
|
Mon, 1 Feb 2010 15:03:14 +1100 |
50 lines |
Re: poem for review
|
Mon, 1 Feb 2010 11:27:43 +0800 |
214 lines |
Re: poem for review
|
Mon, 1 Feb 2010 11:26:33 +0800 |
183 lines |
Re: poem for review
|
Mon, 1 Feb 2010 11:20:02 +0800 |
162 lines |
Re: poem for review
|
Mon, 1 Feb 2010 11:18:04 +0800 |
130 lines |
Re: Poetryetc Featured Poet
|
Sun, 31 Jan 2010 19:59:17 -0500 |
46 lines |