JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for POETRYETC Archives


POETRYETC Archives

POETRYETC Archives


February 2010


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"Chernobyl in the Amazon" (1 message)
'Chernobyl in the Amazon' (1 message)
2010 03 feb snapshot -- first try (2 messages)
3 poems (6 messages)
<No subject> (11 messages)
A bit early (1 message)
A little funny share :) (1 message)
a little kid photographer (9 messages)
a little kid photographer / reading skills (4 messages)
A question of style (3 messages)
about colour (17 messages)
Andrew's zimmer? (1 message)
another photographer (2 messages)
art history status of photography (3 messages)
At sixes and sevens? (1 message)
Bar-B-Q part two... (4 messages)
blog larfs (2 messages)
blue monochrome (1 message)
bog update (2 messages)
British and Irish Poets List ban (3 messages)
Bush Slam poem (13 messages)
Cinese poem, very famous (12 messages)
Contemporary Verse II, Winnipeg (3 messages)
dementia treatments (1 message)
Dorothy Porter article (9 messages)
Dynamic performers INDIGO (SA) + THE SIEGE this Sat 6 Feb at Perth Poetry Club (1 message)
East Asian painting (1 message)
Elif Batuman's THE POSSESSED (6 messages)
Ewa Lipska (1 message)
Family Snapshot (8 messages)
Film (4 messages)
Fwd: A little funny share :) (1 message)
Fwd: Curley, Heller, Kimmelman and Pines Reading on February 22nd (1 message)
Fwd: Modern Poetry Seminar (1 message)
Fwd: orphan works (between 25 and 50 million in the UK alone) (1 message)
get "published" online... (1 message)
Going for Baroque (1 message)
H'm (2 messages)
Hamilton Stone Review #20 now online (1 message)
happy birthday, Dave (20 messages)
hard rain (4 messages)
Hear Mags Webster and Nicolette Stasko (NSW) at Perth Poetry Club this Sat 20 Feb (1 message)
How To Write A Chinese Poem (15 messages)
in lieu of a snap (5 messages)
iPad (1 message)
Jacket magazine: An Announcement from John Tranter and Al Filreis (2 messages)
John Tranter interview and poems at The Argotist Online (5 messages)
judy discombobulated (13 messages)
lait snappe P £$£$£$£$£$ Thursday, 25 February 2010 (6 messages)
landscape and politics (5 messages)
late snap - thin (1 message)
late snap - thin) (6 messages)
lethargic snap (2 messages)
Modern Poetry Seminar (1 message)
monochrome photography (10 messages)
more B&W trivia (2 messages)
more colour theory (4 messages)
new media arts (15 messages)
Notice: Mudlark (1 message)
other poets (2 messages)
pat snap -=-="-"=-=- Wednesday, 17 February 2010 (7 messages)
pat snap _)¬¬""^^""¬¬( _ Wednesday, 24 February 2010 (3 messages)
pat snap _-|\|\|/|/|-_Wednesday, 03 February 2010 (5 messages)
pat snap- )))"!"!"!"!"(((-Wednesday, 10 February 2010 (5 messages)
Perth Poetry Club: Meg McKinlay 27 Feb. Tomas Ford 6 Mar. And more! (1 message)
Photoshop question (25 messages)
poem for review (10 messages)
poems (5 messages)
Poetry reviews (1 message)
Poetryetc Featured Poet (14 messages)
Prosaic snap of a sort (6 messages)
query (1 message)
Quoting Caravaggio (1 message)
really, just a b/w snapshot (2 messages)
Recent NOMADICS blog posts (1 message)
Redirected Snap, Distance Montage (5 messages)
Robert Frost poem (3 messages)
semiotic bullshit (1 message)
she professes disasters (4 messages)
snap (4 messages)
Snap (expansion) - A 'missing letter' to Spicer (1 message)
Snap (found object, avoiding the French) (8 messages)
Snap (this time) (9 messages)
Snap - A 'missing letter' to Spicer (8 messages)
Snap - Vincent (3 messages)
snap snaP snAP sNAP SNAP SNAp SNap Snap (4 messages)
Snap That Fallen Idol (2 messages)
Snap That Hickey (5 messages)
SNAP THAT HICKEY AGAIN (4 messages)
SNAP THAT MASH-UP (1 message)
Snap-in-time: "Adhesions" (4 messages)
snap: a quiet lie-down (7 messages)
snap: Clever dog! (2 messages)
snap: the leash (5 messages)
snap: the other side (3 messages)
snap: the unfortunate tourist (5 messages)
snap: the wholly trinity (2 messages)
snapshot (5 messages)
talking of Edmonton (2 messages)
The desire to testify (2 messages)
the sin-eater (27 messages)
The Whole Island, Reading (8 messages)
ubuntu studio (7 messages)
um, my reading (10 messages)
unsubscribe (4 messages)
Violent femme CORAL CARTER at Perth Poetry Club this Sat 13 Feb (1 message)
website quick question (3 messages)
Well, & what do poets think? (8 messages)
[Fwd: Re: new media arts] (1 message)
[Fwd: Readings 5 webjournal is now online] (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

POETRYETC Home

POETRYETC Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"Chernobyl in the Amazon"

"Chernobyl in the Amazon"

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 11:18:54 +0200

11 lines

New Thread

'Chernobyl in the Amazon'

Re: 'Chernobyl in the Amazon'

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 11:22:58 -0000

40 lines

New Thread

2010 03 feb snapshot -- first try

2010 03 feb snapshot -- first try

sharon brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 12:03:45 -0700

105 lines

Re: 2010 03 feb snapshot -- first try

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 09:30:15 -0000

122 lines

New Thread

3 poems

3 poems

Frederick Pollack <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:47:14 -0500

170 lines

Re: 3 poems

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:41:10 -0700

37 lines

Re: 3 poems

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:14:32 +1100

15 lines

Re: 3 poems

Frederick Pollack <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:48:59 -0500

45 lines

Re: 3 poems

Brian Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:18:59 -0800

188 lines

Re: 3 poems

Frederick Pollack <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:21:08 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:26:05 +0800

24 lines

<No subject>

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:47:35 +0000

44 lines

<No subject>

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:05:51 -0000

40 lines

<No subject>

ROBIN HAMILTON <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:05:04 +0000

35 lines

<No subject>

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:06:01 -0800

46 lines

<No subject>

Angel Robert Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 22:04:05 -0800

9 lines

<No subject>

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:26:12 +0200

16 lines

<No subject>

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:38:13 -0700

38 lines

<No subject>

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:45:57 -0000

26 lines

<No subject>

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:28:01 -0800

39 lines

<No subject>

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 Feb 2010 17:16:16 -0000

25 lines

New Thread

A bit early

A bit early

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:11:59 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

A little funny share :)

Re: A little funny share :)

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 08:59:07 -0700

52 lines

New Thread

a little kid photographer

a little kid photographer

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:50:19 -0500

32 lines

Re: a little kid photographer

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 18:55:28 +1100

22 lines

Re: a little kid photographer

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 17:04:04 +1100

19 lines

Re: a little kid photographer

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:56:07 -0500

55 lines

Re: a little kid photographer

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 08:01:36 +1100

22 lines

Re: a little kid photographer

Angel Robert Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 13:07:52 -0800

49 lines

Re: a little kid photographer

Angel Robert Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 13:54:07 -0800

74 lines

Re: a little kid photographer

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 18:33:59 -0500

97 lines

Re: a little kid photographer

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 15:05:28 +1100

16 lines

New Thread

a little kid photographer / reading skills

Re: a little kid photographer / reading skills

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 06:24:14 +1100

68 lines

Re: a little kid photographer / reading skills

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 13:39:57 -0600

97 lines

Re: a little kid photographer / reading skills

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 07:57:40 +1100

122 lines

Re: a little kid photographer / reading skills

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:40:39 +1100

21 lines

New Thread

A question of style

A question of style

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 17:55:23 +1100

35 lines

Re: A question of style

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 04:49:06 -0500

53 lines

Re: A question of style

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:41:38 -0700

42 lines

New Thread

about colour

about colour

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 11:42:45 +1100

33 lines

Re: about colour

Peter ciccariello <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 20:08:52 -0500

72 lines

Re: about colour

Angel Robert Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 17:33:44 -0800

80 lines

Re: about colour

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 17:45:45 -0800

102 lines

Re: about colour

Peter ciccariello <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 21:34:12 -0500

47 lines

Re: about colour

Peter ciccariello <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 21:43:43 -0500

111 lines

Re: about colour

Angel Robert Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 18:54:39 -0800

138 lines

Re: about colour

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 18:27:51 +1100

56 lines

Re: about colour

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 13:34:33 -0700

68 lines

Re: about colour

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 13:36:14 -0700

66 lines

Re: about colour

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:51:37 +1100

33 lines

Re: about colour

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:52:22 +1100

48 lines

Re: about colour

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:12:06 +1100

28 lines

Re: about colour

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:41:12 -0700

58 lines

Re: about colour

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:48:53 -0700

36 lines

Re: about colour

Peter ciccariello <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:56:17 -0500

70 lines

Re: about colour

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 Feb 2010 19:35:17 +1100

19 lines

New Thread

Andrew's zimmer?

Re: Andrew's zimmer?

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:19:27 -0700

34 lines

New Thread

another photographer

another photographer

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:29:12 +1100

13 lines

Re: another photographer

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:32:59 -0700

40 lines

New Thread

art history status of photography

art history status of photography

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 18:57:32 +1100

24 lines

Re: art history status of photography

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 07:58:05 -0500

52 lines

Re: art history status of photography

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 10:13:18 -0700

84 lines

New Thread

At sixes and sevens?

At sixes and sevens?

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:13:02 -0600

26 lines

New Thread

Bar-B-Q part two...

Bar-B-Q part two...

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:05:07 +1100

182 lines

Re: Bar-B-Q part two...

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:55:23 -0700

39 lines

Re: Bar-B-Q part two...

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 08:05:39 +1100

16 lines

Re: Bar-B-Q part two...

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 08:21:46 +1100

20 lines

New Thread

blog larfs

blog larfs

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:00:03 +0800

19 lines

Re: blog larfs

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:52:42 -0700

48 lines

New Thread

blue monochrome

blue monochrome

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 20:11:54 +1100

14 lines

New Thread

bog update

bog update

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 16:31:39 +1100

18 lines

Re: bog update

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 08:49:27 -0700

47 lines

New Thread

British and Irish Poets List ban

British and Irish Poets List ban

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 20:07:32 +0000

101 lines

Re: British and Irish Poets List ban

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 07:53:22 +1100

100 lines

Re: British and Irish Poets List ban

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:44:35 +0000

135 lines

New Thread

Bush Slam poem

Bush Slam poem

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 10:59:02 +1100

17 lines

Re: Bush Slam poem

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 08:42:44 +0800

35 lines

Re: Bush Slam poem

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 09:05:43 +0800

35 lines

Re: Bush Slam poem

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 12:49:41 +1100

52 lines

Re: Bush Slam poem

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 19:11:22 +1100

85 lines

Re: Bush Slam poem

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 09:02:45 -0700

47 lines

Re: Bush Slam poem

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 09:09:46 -0700

53 lines

Re: Bush Slam poem

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 15:45:46 +1100

38 lines

Re: Bush Slam poem

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 18:12:28 +1100

52 lines

Re: Bush Slam poem

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 18:27:32 +1100

22 lines

Re: Bush Slam poem

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 09:48:39 -0700

73 lines

Re: Bush Slam poem

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 17:29:15 -0000

88 lines

Re: Bush Slam poem

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 11:07:21 +1100

29 lines

New Thread

Cinese poem, very famous

Re: Cinese poem, very famous

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 17:00:07 -0000

39 lines

Re: Cinese poem, very famous

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 09:19:04 +0000

65 lines

Re: Cinese poem, very famous

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 20:38:27 +1100

20 lines

Re: Cinese poem, very famous

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 10:41:34 -0000

94 lines

Re: Cinese poem, very famous

Roger Collett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 10:48:52 -0000

80 lines

Re: Cinese poem, very famous

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 11:13:14 +0000

107 lines

Re: Cinese poem, very famous

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 11:22:01 +0000

39 lines

Re: Cinese poem, very famous

Roger Collett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 11:27:27 -0000

128 lines

Re: Cinese poem, very famous

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 11:28:13 +0000

119 lines

Re: Cinese poem, very famous

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 11:33:38 +0000

159 lines

Re: Cinese poem, very famous

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 11:52:40 +0000

122 lines

Re: Cinese poem, very famous

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 09:49:15 -0700

43 lines

New Thread

Contemporary Verse II, Winnipeg

Contemporary Verse II, Winnipeg

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:48:45 -0000

62 lines

Re: Contemporary Verse II, Winnipeg

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:54:14 -0700

113 lines

Re: Contemporary Verse II, Winnipeg

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:28:20 -0000

190 lines

New Thread

dementia treatments

dementia treatments

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 18:08:33 +1100

18 lines

New Thread

Dorothy Porter article

Dorothy Porter article

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 09:06:08 +0800

16 lines

Re: Dorothy Porter article

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 19:22:22 +1100

42 lines

Re: Dorothy Porter article

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 17:07:31 +0800

72 lines

Re: Dorothy Porter article

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 23:04:01 +1100

90 lines

Re: Dorothy Porter article

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 20:18:56 +0800

115 lines

Re: Dorothy Porter article

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 20:25:40 +0800

133 lines

Re: Dorothy Porter article

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 09:52:21 -0700

59 lines

Re: Dorothy Porter article

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 17:51:54 +1100

19 lines

Re: Dorothy Porter article

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 03:52:58 -0500

73 lines

New Thread

Dynamic performers INDIGO (SA) + THE SIEGE this Sat 6 Feb at Perth Poetry Club

Dynamic performers INDIGO (SA) + THE SIEGE this Sat 6 Feb at Perth Poetry Club

Janet Jackson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:20:05 +0800

105 lines

New Thread

East Asian painting

Re: East Asian painting

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 08:27:05 -0700

39 lines

New Thread

Elif Batuman's THE POSSESSED

Elif Batuman's THE POSSESSED

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:36:24 -0500

66 lines

Re: Elif Batuman's THE POSSESSED

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:40:10 +1100

84 lines

Re: Elif Batuman's THE POSSESSED

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:28:30 +1100

22 lines

Re: Elif Batuman's THE POSSESSED

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:10:59 -0700

45 lines

Re: Elif Batuman's THE POSSESSED

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 04:55:37 -0500

71 lines

Re: Elif Batuman's THE POSSESSED

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:44:27 -0700

44 lines

New Thread

Ewa Lipska

Ewa Lipska

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:13:57 +0800

17 lines

New Thread

Family Snapshot

Family Snapshot

ROBIN HAMILTON <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:26:12 +0000

53 lines

Re: Family Snapshot

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:01:29 +0000

70 lines

Re: Family Snapshot

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:12:24 +0800

84 lines

Re: Family Snapshot

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:00:23 -0000

87 lines

Re: Family Snapshot

ROBIN HAMILTON <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:01:25 +0000

22 lines

Re: Family Snapshot

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:40:38 -0500

85 lines

Re: Family Snapshot

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:50:07 -0700

35 lines

Re: Family Snapshot

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:04:26 +0000

39 lines

New Thread

Film

Film

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 22:15:55 +0000

27 lines

Re: Film

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 06:23:48 +0800

42 lines

Re: Film

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 22:47:32 +0000

64 lines

Re: Film

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 11:22:03 +1100

81 lines

New Thread

Fwd: A little funny share :)

Fwd: A little funny share :)

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 20:01:14 +0800

29 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Curley, Heller, Kimmelman and Pines Reading on February 22nd

Fwd: Curley, Heller, Kimmelman and Pines Reading on February 22nd

Michael Heller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 11:20:32 -0500

164 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Modern Poetry Seminar

Fwd: Modern Poetry Seminar

Michael Heller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:00:50 -0500

92 lines

New Thread

Fwd: orphan works (between 25 and 50 million in the UK alone)

Fwd: orphan works (between 25 and 50 million in the UK alone)

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:36:43 +1100

206 lines

New Thread

get "published" online...

get "published" online...

deborah russell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 03:46:19 -0700

44 lines

New Thread

Going for Baroque

Going for Baroque

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 15:35:40 +1100

33 lines

New Thread

H'm

H'm

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 12:40:48 +0000

23 lines

Re: H'm

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:13:09 -0500

68 lines

New Thread

Hamilton Stone Review #20 now online

Hamilton Stone Review #20 now online

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 10:36:49 -0600

33 lines

New Thread

happy birthday, Dave

happy birthday, Dave

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 08:27:54 +1100

23 lines

Re: happy birthday, Dave

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 21:57:46 -0000

41 lines

Re: happy birthday, Dave

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 15:21:54 -0700

48 lines

Re: happy birthday, Dave

Randolph Healy <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 22:36:20 +0000

17 lines

Re: happy birthday, Dave

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 00:11:40 +0000

42 lines

Re: happy birthday, Dave

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 16:39:21 -0800

53 lines

Re: happy birthday, Dave

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 12:09:05 +1100

66 lines

Re: happy birthday, Dave

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 07:32:36 +0000

94 lines

Re: happy birthday, Dave

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 05:07:44 -0800

129 lines

Re: happy birthday, Dave

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 14:04:21 -0700

39 lines

Re: happy birthday, Dave

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 21:06:25 +0000

169 lines

Re: happy birthday, Dave

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 16:20:24 -0800

50 lines

Re: happy birthday, Dave

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 16:23:11 -0800

56 lines

Re: happy birthday, Dave

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:33:18 +0000

81 lines

Re: happy birthday, Dave

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 21:44:12 -0800

101 lines

Re: happy birthday, Dave

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 06:41:18 +0000

134 lines

Re: happy birthday, Dave

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:00:13 -0700

42 lines

Re: happy birthday, Dave

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:21:23 -0800

68 lines

Re: happy birthday, Dave

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:13:29 -0800

31 lines

Re: happy birthday, Dave

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:00:55 +0000

54 lines

New Thread

hard rain

hard rain

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:39:12 -0700

31 lines

Re: hard rain

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 06:17:48 +1100

75 lines

Re: hard rain

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 09:54:32 +0800

137 lines

Re: hard rain

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 08:50:07 -0700

36 lines

New Thread

Hear Mags Webster and Nicolette Stasko (NSW) at Perth Poetry Club this Sat 20 Feb

Hear Mags Webster and Nicolette Stasko (NSW) at Perth Poetry Club this Sat 20 Feb

Janet Jackson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:25:47 +0800

95 lines

New Thread

How To Write A Chinese Poem

How To Write A Chinese Poem

Angel Robert Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 11:00:11 -0800

18 lines

Re: How To Write A Chinese Poem

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 14:31:37 -0500

35 lines

Re: How To Write A Chinese Poem

Angel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 12:41:18 -0800

51 lines

Re: How To Write A Chinese Poem

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 06:36:50 +0800

33 lines

Re: How To Write A Chinese Poem

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 23:09:26 +0000

15 lines

Re: How To Write A Chinese Poem

Angel Robert Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 15:14:28 -0800

26 lines

Re: How To Write A Chinese Poem

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 16:13:55 -0800

56 lines

Re: How To Write A Chinese Poem

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 19:44:02 -0500

72 lines

Re: How To Write A Chinese Poem

Angel Robert Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 16:55:09 -0800

87 lines

Re: How To Write A Chinese Poem

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 21:19:51 -0500

107 lines

Re: How To Write A Chinese Poem

Angel Robert Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 18:24:10 -0800

129 lines

Re: How To Write A Chinese Poem

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 21:25:22 -0500

153 lines

Re: How To Write A Chinese Poem

Angel Robert Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 18:27:30 -0800

175 lines

Re: How To Write A Chinese Poem

Angel Robert Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 18:29:47 -0800

185 lines

Re: How To Write A Chinese Poem

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 20:50:37 -0800

216 lines

New Thread

in lieu of a snap

in lieu of a snap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:44:38 -0700

35 lines

Re: in lieu of a snap

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:14:54 -0000

52 lines

Re: in lieu of a snap

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 07:44:18 +0800

65 lines

Re: in lieu of a snap

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 00:42:26 -0500

51 lines

Re: in lieu of a snap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 09:51:30 -0700

38 lines

New Thread

iPad

Re: iPad

Glen PHILLIPS <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 15:43:43 +0800

31 lines

New Thread

Jacket magazine: An Announcement from John Tranter and Al Filreis

Jacket magazine: An Announcement from John Tranter and Al Filreis

John Tranter <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 14:52:04 +1100

95 lines

Re: Jacket magazine: An Announcement from John Tranter and Al Filreis

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 09:42:17 -0700

39 lines

New Thread

John Tranter interview and poems at The Argotist Online

John Tranter interview and poems at The Argotist Online

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 21:29:47 +0100

15 lines

Re: John Tranter interview and poems at The Argotist Online

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:38:49 +0000

31 lines

Re: John Tranter interview and poems at The Argotist Online

Desmond Swords <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:43:24 +0000

79 lines

Re: John Tranter interview and poems at The Argotist Online

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:41:25 -0500

40 lines

Re: John Tranter interview and poems at The Argotist Online

Desmond Swords <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:06:46 +0000

68 lines

New Thread

judy discombobulated

judy discombobulated

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 06:50:14 +1100

26 lines

Re: judy discombobulated

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 13:02:11 -0800

53 lines

Re: judy discombobulated

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 14:07:04 -0700

36 lines

Re: judy discombobulated

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 21:07:52 +0000

77 lines

Re: judy discombobulated

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 16:29:32 -0800

54 lines

Re: judy discombobulated

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 16:31:24 -0800

22 lines

Re: judy discombobulated

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:42:43 +1100

76 lines

Re: judy discombobulated

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 17:01:52 -0800

103 lines

Re: judy discombobulated

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:55:47 -0000

93 lines

Re: judy discombobulated

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:25:41 +0000

114 lines

Re: judy discombobulated

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:30:14 -0000

132 lines

Re: judy discombobulated

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:11:51 -0700

44 lines

Re: judy discombobulated

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:28:09 -0800

64 lines

New Thread

lait snappe P £$£$£$£$£$ Thursday, 25 February 2010

lait snappe P £$£$£$£$£$ Thursday, 25 February 2010

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:25:41 -0000

23 lines

Re: lait snappe P £$£$£$£$£$ Thursday, 25 February 2010

Brian Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:19:49 -0800

41 lines

Re: lait snappe P £$£$£$£$£$ Thursday, 25 February 2010

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 07:48:02 -0000

67 lines

Re: lait snappe P £$£$£$£$£$ Thursday, 25 February 2010

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:32:19 +0000

87 lines

Re: lait snappe P £$£$£$£$£$ Thursday, 25 February 2010

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 10:23:42 -0000

108 lines

Re: lait snappe P £$£$£$£$£$ Thursday, 25 February 2010

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 10:28:27 +0000

127 lines

New Thread

landscape and politics

landscape and politics

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 18:45:27 +1100

13 lines

Re: landscape and politics

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 19:47:07 +1100

12 lines

Re: landscape and politics

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 09:57:54 -0700

43 lines

Re: landscape and politics

Peter ciccariello <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 14:30:42 -0500

50 lines

Re: landscape and politics

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:50:52 +1100

20 lines

New Thread

late snap - thin

late snap - thin

Tina Bass <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 21:25:23 +0000

35 lines

New Thread

late snap - thin)

late snap - thin)

Tina Bass <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:59:18 +0000

28 lines

Re: late snap - thin)

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 20:27:00 -0000

43 lines

Re: late snap - thin)

Angel Robert Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:29:59 -0800

32 lines

Re: late snap - thin)

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:36:44 -0700

52 lines

Re: late snap - thin)

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:37:07 +0000

50 lines

Re: late snap - thin)

Tina Bass <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 21:26:30 +0000

76 lines

New Thread

lethargic snap

lethargic snap

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 22:59:56 +1100

46 lines

Re: lethargic snap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:44:00 -0700

36 lines

New Thread

Modern Poetry Seminar

Re: Modern Poetry Seminar

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:48:26 +0800

101 lines

New Thread

monochrome photography

Re: monochrome photography

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 18:14:07 +1100

91 lines

Re: monochrome photography

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 18:25:22 +1100

16 lines

Re: monochrome photography

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 08:38:23 +0000

113 lines

Re: monochrome photography

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 19:47:48 +1100

16 lines

Re: monochrome photography

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 12:23:05 +0000

37 lines

Re: monochrome photography

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 14:07:29 -0700

39 lines

Re: monochrome photography

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 17:41:22 +1100

40 lines

Re: monochrome photography

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 08:27:53 +0000

64 lines

Re: monochrome photography

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 20:16:13 +1100

14 lines

Re: monochrome photography

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 10:25:03 +0000

36 lines

New Thread

more B&W trivia

more B&W trivia

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:45:02 +1100

18 lines

Re: more B&W trivia

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:10:38 +1100

20 lines

New Thread

more colour theory

more colour theory

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:47:46 +1100

17 lines

Re: more colour theory

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:59:13 +1100

18 lines

Re: more colour theory

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:23:28 +1100

23 lines

Re: more colour theory

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:43:58 -0700

42 lines

New Thread

new media arts

new media arts

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:48:12 +1100

18 lines

Re: new media arts

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:53:16 -0000

96 lines

Re: new media arts

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:47:41 -0700

50 lines

Re: new media arts

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:50:29 -0000

197 lines

Re: new media arts

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:14:43 +1100

31 lines

Re: new media arts

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:06:28 +1100

27 lines

Re: new media arts

Catherine Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 23:29:37 -0800

48 lines

Re: new media arts

Catherine Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 23:32:19 -0800

57 lines

Re: new media arts

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:47:10 +1100

16 lines

Re: new media arts

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:45:51 -0000

172 lines

Re: new media arts

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:36:26 -0700

52 lines

Re: new media arts

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:27:52 -0000

142 lines

Re: new media arts

Catherine Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:59:53 -0800

37 lines

Re: new media arts

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:19:55 +1100

73 lines

Re: new media arts

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Feb 2010 20:18:35 +1100

25 lines

New Thread

Notice: Mudlark

Notice: Mudlark

William Slaughter <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:43:41 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

other poets

other poets

Angel Robert Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:19:00 -0800

9 lines

Re: other poets

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:21:22 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

pat snap -=-="-"=-=- Wednesday, 17 February 2010

pat snap -=-="-"=-=- Wednesday, 17 February 2010

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:04:28 -0000

36 lines

Re: pat snap -=-="-"=-=- Wednesday, 17 February 2010

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 21:19:15 +1100

53 lines

Re: pat snap -=-="-"=-=- Wednesday, 17 February 2010

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 10:34:27 -0000

68 lines

Re: pat snap -=-="-"=-=- Wednesday, 17 February 2010

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:54:04 +0800

65 lines

Re: pat snap -=-="-"=-=- Wednesday, 17 February 2010

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:17:56 -0500

83 lines

Re: pat snap -=-="-"=-=- Wednesday, 17 February 2010

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:23:03 -0000

80 lines

Re: pat snap -=-="-"=-=- Wednesday, 17 February 2010

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:35:02 -0700

34 lines

New Thread

pat snap _)¬¬""^^""¬¬( _ Wednesday, 24 February 2010

pat snap _)¬¬""^^""¬¬( _ Wednesday, 24 February 2010

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 07:37:25 -0000

26 lines

Re: pat snap _)¬¬""^^""¬¬( _ Wednesday, 24 February 2010

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 02:45:48 -0500

43 lines

Re: pat snap _)¬¬""^^""¬¬( _ Wednesday, 24 February 2010

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:35:21 -0700

54 lines

New Thread

pat snap _-|\|\|/|/|-_Wednesday, 03 February 2010

pat snap _-|\|\|/|/|-_Wednesday, 03 February 2010

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 08:59:38 -0000

24 lines

Re: pat snap _-|\|\|/|/|-_Wednesday, 03 February 2010

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 14:40:12 +0200

31 lines

Re: pat snap _-|\|\|/|/|-_Wednesday, 03 February 2010

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 13:35:45 -0000

51 lines

Re: pat snap _-|\|\|/|/|-_Wednesday, 03 February 2010

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 22:21:53 +0800

69 lines

Re: pat snap _-|\|\|/|/|-_Wednesday, 03 February 2010

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:43:22 -0700

36 lines

New Thread

pat snap- )))"!"!"!"!"(((-Wednesday, 10 February 2010

pat snap- )))"!"!"!"!"(((-Wednesday, 10 February 2010

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:46:46 -0000

36 lines

Re: pat snap- )))"!"!"!"!"(((-Wednesday, 10 February 2010

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:10:47 +0000

54 lines

Re: pat snap- )))"!"!"!"!"(((-Wednesday, 10 February 2010

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:17:36 +0800

73 lines

Re: pat snap- )))"!"!"!"!"(((-Wednesday, 10 February 2010

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:35:15 -0000

89 lines

Re: pat snap- )))"!"!"!"!"(((-Wednesday, 10 February 2010

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:37:16 -0800

50 lines

New Thread

Perth Poetry Club: Meg McKinlay 27 Feb. Tomas Ford 6 Mar. And more!

Perth Poetry Club: Meg McKinlay 27 Feb. Tomas Ford 6 Mar. And more!

Janet Jackson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:38:09 +0800

124 lines

New Thread

Photoshop question

Photoshop question

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 17:55:54 +1100

15 lines

Re: Photoshop question

Angel Robert Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 23:23:00 -0800

20 lines

Re: Photoshop question

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 18:36:22 +1100

17 lines

Re: Photoshop question

Angel Robert Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 00:04:27 -0800

65 lines

Re: Photoshop question

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 19:11:31 +1100

17 lines

Re: Photoshop question

Angel Robert Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 00:17:14 -0800

33 lines

Re: Photoshop question

Angel Robert Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 00:38:49 -0800

45 lines

Re: Photoshop question

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 20:58:49 +1100

52 lines

Re: Photoshop question

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 20:28:27 +1100

15 lines

Re: Photoshop question

Catherine Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 09:34:49 -0800

29 lines

Re: Photoshop question

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 14:08:20 +1100

34 lines

Re: Photoshop question

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 14:25:49 +1100

27 lines

Re: Photoshop question

Angel Robert Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 19:51:54 -0800

49 lines

Re: Photoshop question

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 17:02:24 +1100

23 lines

Re: Photoshop question

Angel Robert Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 22:46:04 -0800

58 lines

Re: Photoshop question

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 18:42:40 +1100

14 lines

Re: Photoshop question

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 19:36:15 +1100

14 lines

Re: Photoshop question

Angel Robert Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 18:00:53 -0800

18 lines

Re: Photoshop question

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 16:58:11 +1100

29 lines

Re: Photoshop question

Angel Robert Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 22:00:15 -0800

34 lines

Re: Photoshop question

Angel Robert Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 22:17:25 -0800

49 lines

Re: Photoshop question

Angel Robert Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 22:22:17 -0800

55 lines

Re: Photoshop question

Angel Robert Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 22:27:33 -0800

64 lines

Re: Photoshop question

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 17:59:16 +1100

20 lines

Re: Photoshop question

Angel Robert Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 23:13:03 -0800

14 lines

New Thread

poem for review

Re: poem for review

Janet Jackson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 11:18:04 +0800

130 lines

Re: poem for review

Janet Jackson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 11:20:02 +0800

162 lines

Re: poem for review

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 11:26:33 +0800

183 lines

Re: poem for review

Janet Jackson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 11:27:43 +0800

214 lines

Re: poem for review

Angel Robert Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 Jan 2010 20:50:45 -0800

196 lines

Re: poem for review

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 08:19:51 -0000

159 lines

Re: poem for review

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 08:26:16 -0000

208 lines

Re: poem for review

Martin Dolan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 23:19:49 +1100

27 lines

Re: poem for review

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 21:51:36 +0800

42 lines

Re: poem for review

Angel Robert Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 20:53:20 -0800

216 lines

New Thread

poems

poems

Frederick Pollack <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 20:56:07 -0500

337 lines

Re: poems

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:15:55 +1100

19 lines

Re: poems

Frederick Pollack <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:44:02 -0500

29 lines

Re: poems

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:11:14 -0700

31 lines

Re: poems

Frederick Pollack <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:13:40 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

Poetry reviews

Poetry reviews

Millicent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:25:35 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

Poetryetc Featured Poet

Re: Poetryetc Featured Poet

Peter ciccariello <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 Jan 2010 19:59:17 -0500

46 lines

Re: Poetryetc Featured Poet

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 09:12:54 +0000

34 lines

Re: Poetryetc Featured Poet

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 08:36:30 -0700

42 lines

Re: Poetryetc Featured Poet

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 18:52:09 -0500

43 lines

Re: Poetryetc Featured Poet

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 18:54:46 -0500

42 lines

Re: Poetryetc Featured Poet

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 18:58:00 -0500

64 lines

Re: Poetryetc Featured Poet

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 19:00:42 -0500

54 lines

Re: Poetryetc Featured Poet

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 19:03:32 -0500

59 lines

Re: Poetryetc Featured Poet

Brian Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 03:56:17 -0800

34 lines

Re: Poetryetc Featured Poet

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 08:40:29 -0500

58 lines

Re: Poetryetc Featured Poet

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:03:31 -0700

40 lines

Re: Poetryetc Featured Poet

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:40:34 -0500

60 lines

Re: Poetryetc Featured Poet

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 13:59:07 -0700

35 lines

Re: Poetryetc Featured Poet

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 16:47:33 -0500

51 lines

New Thread

Prosaic snap of a sort

Prosaic snap of a sort

Ken Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:28:36 -0500

32 lines

Re: Prosaic snap of a sort

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:21:43 -0500

48 lines

Re: Prosaic snap of a sort

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 23:55:45 +0800

70 lines

Re: Prosaic snap of a sort

Ken Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:17:02 -0500

30 lines

Re: Prosaic snap of a sort

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:19:17 -0000

47 lines

Re: Prosaic snap of a sort

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:57:37 -0700

61 lines

New Thread

query

query

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 17:52:19 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

Quoting Caravaggio

Quoting Caravaggio

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 19:27:10 +1100

21 lines

New Thread

really, just a b/w snapshot

really, just a b/w snapshot

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 08:55:18 -0700

38 lines

Re: really, just a b/w snapshot

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:10:05 -0000

54 lines

New Thread

Recent NOMADICS blog posts

Recent NOMADICS blog posts

Pierre Joris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 08:37:24 -0500

46 lines

New Thread

Redirected Snap, Distance Montage

Redirected Snap, Distance Montage

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 23:59:10 +0000

44 lines

Re: Redirected Snap, Distance Montage

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:34:37 +1100

34 lines

Re: Redirected Snap, Distance Montage

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:48:56 +0000

51 lines

Re: Redirected Snap, Distance Montage

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:23:50 -0700

59 lines

Re: Redirected Snap, Distance Montage

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:25:30 +0000

69 lines

New Thread

Robert Frost poem

Robert Frost poem

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 15:03:14 +1100

50 lines

Re: Robert Frost poem

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 16:50:49 +0800

63 lines

Re: Robert Frost poem

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 09:27:56 +0000

73 lines

New Thread

semiotic bullshit

semiotic bullshit

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 15:44:32 +1100

103 lines

New Thread

she professes disasters

she professes disasters

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 09:02:08 +1100

26 lines

Re: she professes disasters

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 06:12:48 +0800

39 lines

Re: she professes disasters

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 15:23:01 -0700

65 lines

Re: she professes disasters

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 09:44:24 -0000

40 lines

New Thread

snap

snap

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:57:16 +1100

12 lines

Re: snap

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 04:19:06 -0500

28 lines

Re: snap

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:56:50 -0000

27 lines

Re: snap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:33:50 -0700

37 lines

New Thread

Snap (expansion) - A 'missing letter' to Spicer

Snap (expansion) - A 'missing letter' to Spicer

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:18:12 -0800

70 lines

New Thread

Snap (found object, avoiding the French)

Snap (found object, avoiding the French)

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:30:33 +0000

34 lines

Re: Snap (found object, avoiding the French)

ROBIN HAMILTON <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:41:40 +0000

60 lines

Re: Snap (found object, avoiding the French)

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:51:26 +0000

81 lines

Re: Snap (found object, avoiding the French)

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:59:55 +0000

103 lines

Re: Snap (found object, avoiding the French)

ROBIN HAMILTON <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:11:18 +0000

58 lines

Re: Snap (found object, avoiding the French)

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:18:48 +0000

75 lines

Re: Snap (found object, avoiding the French)

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:51:31 -0700

36 lines

Re: Snap (found object, avoiding the French)

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:53:32 -0700

46 lines

New Thread

Snap (this time)

Snap (this time)

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:08:48 +0000

26 lines

Re: Snap (this time)

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:32:29 -0800

41 lines

Re: Snap (this time)

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:02:44 +0000

61 lines

Re: Snap (this time)

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:22:25 -0800

78 lines

Re: Snap (this time)

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:29:52 +0000

102 lines

Re: Snap (this time)

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:05:16 -0800

132 lines

Re: Snap (this time)

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:28:25 -0000

162 lines

Re: Snap (this time)

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:48:26 +0000

177 lines

Re: Snap (this time)

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 09:43:07 -0000

201 lines

New Thread

Snap - A 'missing letter' to Spicer

Snap - A 'missing letter' to Spicer

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:26:38 -0800

65 lines

Re: Snap - A 'missing letter' to Spicer

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:44:02 +0800

80 lines

Re: Snap - A 'missing letter' to Spicer

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:32:37 -0700

34 lines

Re: Snap - A 'missing letter' to Spicer

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:17:17 +0000

123 lines

Re: Snap - A 'missing letter' to Spicer

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 09:50:23 -0800

47 lines

Re: Snap - A 'missing letter' to Spicer

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:05:58 -0800

137 lines

Re: Snap - A 'missing letter' to Spicer

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:32:43 +0000

176 lines

Re: Snap - A 'missing letter' to Spicer

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:00:32 -0700

35 lines

New Thread

Snap - Vincent

Snap - Vincent

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:38:04 -0800

51 lines

Re: Snap - Vincent

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:38:20 -0700

78 lines

Re: Snap - Vincent

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:53:30 -0800

102 lines

New Thread

snap snaP snAP sNAP SNAP SNAp SNap Snap

snap snaP snAP sNAP SNAP SNAp SNap Snap

Angel Robert Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:49:44 -0800

18 lines

Re: snap snaP snAP sNAP SNAP SNAp SNap Snap

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:11:01 -0000

34 lines

Re: snap snaP snAP sNAP SNAP SNAp SNap Snap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:22:57 -0700

47 lines

Re: snap snaP snAP sNAP SNAP SNAp SNap Snap

Angel Robert Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:23:53 -0800

56 lines

New Thread

Snap That Fallen Idol

Snap That Fallen Idol

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:37:51 +0000

29 lines

Re: Snap That Fallen Idol

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:21:08 -0700

34 lines

New Thread

Snap That Hickey

Snap That Hickey

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 23:13:43 +0000

32 lines

Re: Snap That Hickey

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 15:51:12 -0800

45 lines

Re: Snap That Hickey

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 02:00:01 +0000

65 lines

Re: Snap That Hickey

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 08:27:58 -0700

59 lines

Re: Snap That Hickey

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 20:25:37 +0000

92 lines

New Thread

SNAP THAT HICKEY AGAIN

SNAP THAT HICKEY AGAIN

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:56:37 +0000

68 lines

Re: SNAP THAT HICKEY AGAIN

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 13:04:47 -0800

93 lines

Re: SNAP THAT HICKEY AGAIN

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 23:26:23 +0000

122 lines

Re: SNAP THAT HICKEY AGAIN

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:54:08 -0700

36 lines

New Thread

SNAP THAT MASH-UP

Re: SNAP THAT MASH-UP

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 08:38:34 -0700

50 lines

New Thread

Snap-in-time: "Adhesions"

Snap-in-time: "Adhesions"

Ken Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:12:19 -0500

57 lines

Re: Snap-in-time: "Adhesions"

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:23:38 -0000

73 lines

Re: Snap-in-time: "Adhesions"

Ken Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:29:48 -0500

20 lines

Re: Snap-in-time: "Adhesions"

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:33:45 -0700

36 lines

New Thread

snap: a quiet lie-down

snap: a quiet lie-down

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:37:01 +1100

72 lines

Re: snap: a quiet lie-down

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:26:29 +0800

90 lines

Re: snap: a quiet lie-down

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:44:42 +1100

39 lines

Re: snap: a quiet lie-down

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 04:12:23 -0500

90 lines

Re: snap: a quiet lie-down

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:34:40 -0000

87 lines

Re: snap: a quiet lie-down

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:32:57 -0700

39 lines

Re: snap: a quiet lie-down

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:04:01 +1100

14 lines

New Thread

snap: Clever dog!

snap: Clever dog!

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:05:52 +0800

42 lines

Re: snap: Clever dog!

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:39:34 -0700

36 lines

New Thread

snap: the leash

snap: the leash

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 10:17:15 +1100

41 lines

Re: snap: the leash

Brian Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 16:11:34 -0800

59 lines

Re: snap: the leash

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:22:58 +0800

83 lines

Re: snap: the leash

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 08:54:33 -0000

58 lines

Re: snap: the leash

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:41:01 -0700

39 lines

New Thread

snap: the other side

snap: the other side

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:46:18 +1100

35 lines

Re: snap: the other side

Janet Jackson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:21:17 +0800

70 lines

Re: snap: the other side

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:59:18 -0700

36 lines

New Thread

snap: the unfortunate tourist

snap: the unfortunate tourist

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:17:45 -0700

38 lines

Re: snap: the unfortunate tourist

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:32:14 -0000

54 lines

Re: snap: the unfortunate tourist

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:33:20 -0700

35 lines

Re: snap: the unfortunate tourist

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 07:49:29 -0800

60 lines

Re: snap: the unfortunate tourist

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:57:30 -0700

48 lines

New Thread

snap: the wholly trinity

snap: the wholly trinity

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:53:26 +0800

33 lines

Re: snap: the wholly trinity

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:38:07 -0700

60 lines

New Thread

snapshot

snapshot

sharon brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:53:25 -0700

21 lines

Re: snapshot

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:11:48 +1100

38 lines

Re: snapshot

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 05:44:13 +0800

52 lines

Re: snapshot

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:18:21 -0000

38 lines

Re: snapshot

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:28:30 -0700

32 lines

New Thread

talking of Edmonton

talking of Edmonton

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 21:38:11 +1100

48 lines

Re: talking of Edmonton

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:38:27 -0700

37 lines

New Thread

The desire to testify

The desire to testify

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:00:29 -0000

36 lines

Re: The desire to testify

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:47:15 -0700

66 lines

New Thread

the sin-eater

the sin-eater

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 14:54:04 +1100

34 lines

Re: the sin-eater

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 15:02:25 +1100

42 lines

Re: the sin-eater

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 21:38:02 -0800

64 lines

Re: the sin-eater

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 17:14:13 +1100

34 lines

Re: the sin-eater

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 18:05:04 +1100

19 lines

Re: the sin-eater

Angel Robert Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 23:10:09 -0800

25 lines

Re: the sin-eater

ROBIN HAMILTON <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 08:06:15 +0000

39 lines

Re: the sin-eater

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 08:28:36 -0000

48 lines

Re: the sin-eater

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 19:59:36 +1100

70 lines

Re: the sin-eater

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 20:12:58 +1100

19 lines

Re: the sin-eater

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 20:25:08 +1100

19 lines

Re: the sin-eater

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 10:39:22 +0000

67 lines

Re: the sin-eater

Ken Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 08:39:22 -0500

58 lines

Re: the sin-eater

Ken Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 08:50:01 -0500

71 lines

Re: the sin-eater

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 08:43:35 -0700

77 lines

Re: the sin-eater

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 11:37:31 -0500

40 lines

Re: the sin-eater

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 16:57:52 -0000

103 lines

Re: the sin-eater

ROBIN HAMILTON <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 18:09:34 +0000

38 lines

Re: the sin-eater

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 10:41:54 -0800

92 lines

Re: the sin-eater

Angel Robert Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 10:53:01 -0800

119 lines

Re: the sin-eater

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 14:12:32 -0500

91 lines

Re: the sin-eater

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 20:50:14 -0000

154 lines

Re: the sin-eater

ROBIN HAMILTON <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 20:56:54 +0000

18 lines

Re: the sin-eater

Kenneth Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 21:00:37 +0000

141 lines

Re: the sin-eater

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 16:21:04 -0500

33 lines

Re: the sin-eater

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 21:54:07 -0000

50 lines

Re: the sin-eater

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 18:00:17 -0500

63 lines

New Thread

The Whole Island, Reading

The Whole Island, Reading

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 23:05:40 -0500

31 lines

Re: The Whole Island, Reading

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:12:46 -0700

58 lines

Re: The Whole Island, Reading

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:23:56 -0500

70 lines

Re: The Whole Island, Reading

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:28:16 -0700

36 lines

Re: The Whole Island, Reading

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:59:15 -0500

69 lines

Re: The Whole Island, Reading

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:17:37 -0700

47 lines

Re: The Whole Island, Reading

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:27:15 -0500

65 lines

Re: The Whole Island, Reading

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:55:23 -0700

37 lines

New Thread

ubuntu studio

ubuntu studio

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 18:19:05 +1100

16 lines

Re: ubuntu studio

Angel Robert Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 23:32:39 -0800

21 lines

Re: ubuntu studio

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 18:59:03 +1100

20 lines

Re: ubuntu studio

Angel Robert Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 00:08:29 -0800

29 lines

Re: ubuntu studio

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 19:13:19 +1100

15 lines

Re: ubuntu studio

Angel Robert Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 00:17:46 -0800

19 lines

Re: ubuntu studio

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 20:05:39 +1100

14 lines

New Thread

um, my reading

um, my reading

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 11:54:55 -0700

37 lines

Re: um, my reading

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 15:27:41 -0500

52 lines

Re: um, my reading

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 22:47:46 +0000

81 lines

Re: um, my reading

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 10:13:11 +1100

29 lines

Re: um, my reading

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 18:26:55 -0500

106 lines

Re: um, my reading

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 18:41:31 -0500

52 lines

Re: um, my reading

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 09:30:35 -0700

80 lines

Re: um, my reading

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 09:33:14 -0700

47 lines

Re: um, my reading

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 09:34:46 -0700

39 lines

Re: um, my reading

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 18:05:04 -0000

68 lines

New Thread

unsubscribe

unsubscribe

allison a. hedge coke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 16:37:38 -0800

1887 lines

Unsubscribe

Joanne Draper <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:03:51 +0000

9 lines

unsubscribe

Joanne Draper <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:54:19 -0700

10 lines

Re: unsubscribe

ROBIN HAMILTON <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:46:00 +0000

30 lines

New Thread

Violent femme CORAL CARTER at Perth Poetry Club this Sat 13 Feb

Violent femme CORAL CARTER at Perth Poetry Club this Sat 13 Feb

Janet Jackson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 16:00:06 +0800

93 lines

New Thread

website quick question

website quick question

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:23:02 +1100

12 lines

Re: website quick question

Catherine Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:41:02 -0800

25 lines

Re: website quick question

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:52:55 +1100

15 lines

New Thread

Well, & what do poets think?

Well, & what do poets think?

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:06:42 -0700

31 lines

Re: Well, & what do poets think?

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 10:47:45 +1100

58 lines

Re: Well, & what do poets think?

Millicent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:06:25 -0500

100 lines

Re: Well, & what do poets think?

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:13:07 -0500

28 lines

Re: Well, & what do poets think?

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 08:14:31 +0800

89 lines

Re: Well, & what do poets think?

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 17:28:38 -0800

127 lines

Re: Well, & what do poets think?

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 09:16:55 -0700

52 lines

Re: Well, & what do poets think?

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 16:18:06 +0000

125 lines

New Thread

[Fwd: Re: new media arts]

[Fwd: Re: new media arts]

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:49:16 -0000

41 lines

New Thread

[Fwd: Readings 5 webjournal is now online]

[Fwd: Readings 5 webjournal is now online]

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:40:46 -0000

35 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager