JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


December 2009


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

About Logical Links in X-References. (1 message)
An easy New Year Resolution (1 message)
An ewasy New Year Resolution (Presentation attached this time!) (1 message)
An ewasy New Year Resolution (Presentation attached this time!)[Scanned] (2 messages)
Are postcodes personal data? (1 message)
CCTV hacked (2 messages)
Commissioner to be questioned by MPs over poor performance (1 message)
Council worker suspended after disclosure of personal data about the vulnerable from social work files (1 message)
Data processor agreement and the next step? (1 message)
Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate? (12 messages)
Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?[Scanned] (3 messages)
DP humour (2 messages)
DP Jokes. Was: Re: [data-protection] Surveillance society What about Children s Act 1989 s.83 a database by another name? (2 messages)
Facebook releases new privacy settings (3 messages)
Full Electoral Register Use - ICO Guidance (1 message)
FW: Information Commissioner urges organisations to give individuals more privacy choices online (1 message)
Fw: [data-protection] Tracing originator (1 message)
Information Commissioner's Office demystifies data protection (2 messages)
List Business - No longer a moderator/list owner (2 messages)
more on councils and planning apps / possible dry xmas humour (2 messages)
New year resolution attachment filtering (2 messages)
New year resolution attachment filtering[Scanned] (2 messages)
Notification fee - Public Authority (3 messages)
Notification fee - Public Authority[Scanned] (2 messages)
Notification Fees (6 messages)
One last peice of humour - A promise (1 message)
Photos of Staff - Reasonable Work Instruction (12 messages)
Postcodes request (6 messages)
Prime Minister speaks: more FOI and more re-use and, by inference, less ID Card (1 message)
Publishing Pay scales (12 messages)
Publishing Pay scales[Scanned] (2 messages)
Quiet (3 messages)
s.33 research exemption (3 messages)
SAR about a SAR (2 messages)
school vetting rules (2 messages)
school vetting rules: ISA safeguarding rules use the wrong criteria (1 message)
Section 33A of the DPA (3 messages)
Setting mail preference for the holiday season (1 message)
Subject access to risk log (3 messages)
Subject access to risk log[Scanned] (1 message)
Surveillance society (2 messages)
Surveillance society What about Children's Act 1989 s.83 a database by another name? (1 message)
Tracing originator (2 messages)
Viviane Reding picked reported as about to re-write EU data protection laws (1 message)
We're all "miscreants" (2 messages)
What to do if someone did not consent to a staff ID card photo? (2 messages)
Workplace Consequences of Electronic Exhibitionism and Voyeurism (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

About Logical Links in X-References.

About Logical Links in X-References.

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 12:11:18 +0100

45 lines

New Thread

An easy New Year Resolution

An easy New Year Resolution

Karen McCullagh <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Dec 2009 11:31:11 -0000

62 lines

New Thread

An ewasy New Year Resolution (Presentation attached this time!)

An ewasy New Year Resolution (Presentation attached this time!)

Karen McCullagh <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Dec 2009 12:13:08 -0000

363 lines

New Thread

An ewasy New Year Resolution (Presentation attached this time!)[Scanned]

Re: An ewasy New Year Resolution (Presentation attached this time!)[Scanned]

Ronan Durnin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:37:58 -0000

639 lines

Re: An ewasy New Year Resolution (Presentation attached this time!)[Scanned]

Ronan Durnin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:38:31 -0000

805 lines

New Thread

Are postcodes personal data?

Are postcodes personal data?

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:35:25 -0000

113 lines

New Thread

CCTV hacked

CCTV hacked

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:32:54 +0000

131 lines

Re: CCTV hacked

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Dec 2009 21:39:49 -0000

600 lines

New Thread

Commissioner to be questioned by MPs over poor performance

Commissioner to be questioned by MPs over poor performance

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:45:49 -0000

265 lines

New Thread

Council worker suspended after disclosure of personal data about the vulnerable from social work files

Council worker suspended after disclosure of personal data about the vulnerable from social work files

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:07:11 -0000

417 lines

New Thread

Data processor agreement and the next step?

Data processor agreement and the next step?

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Dec 2009 11:07:21 -0000

449 lines

New Thread

Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?

Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:30:32 +0000

80 lines

Re: Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?

Maurice Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:53:12 +0000

120 lines

Re: Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:14:40 -0000

143 lines

Re: Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?

Mark van Harmelen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:48:02 +0000

305 lines

Re: Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:26:33 +0000

260 lines

Re: Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:41:53 +0000

682 lines

Re: Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?

Kevin Mulley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:47:07 +0000

90 lines

Re: Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?

Maurice Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Dec 2009 17:22:22 +0000

778 lines

Re: Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?

Maurice Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Dec 2009 12:03:13 +0000

951 lines

Re: Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?

Mark van Harmelen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:41:19 +0000

792 lines

Re: Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:50:51 -0000

325 lines

Re: Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:12:06 +0000

366 lines

New Thread

Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?[Scanned]

Re: Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?[Scanned]

Ronan Durnin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:10:46 -0000

127 lines

Re: Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?[Scanned]

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:53:30 +0000

166 lines

Re: Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?[Scanned]

Ronan Durnin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:42:51 -0000

298 lines

New Thread

DP humour

DP humour

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Dec 2009 12:22:56 +0100

321 lines

Re: DP humour

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:43:28 +0000

412 lines

New Thread

DP Jokes. Was: Re: [data-protection] Surveillance society What about Children s Act 1989 s.83 a database by another name?

DP Jokes. Was: Re: [data-protection] Surveillance society What about Children s Act 1989 s.83 a database by another name?

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:02:15 +0100

310 lines

Re: DP Jokes. Was: Re: [data-protection] Surveillance society What about Children s Act 1989 s.83 a database by another name?

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:31:18 -0000

349 lines

New Thread

Facebook releases new privacy settings

Facebook releases new privacy settings

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:46:09 +0000

161 lines

Re: Facebook releases new privacy settings

Chris Bayliss (ITS) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:23:33 +0000

507 lines

Re: Facebook releases new privacy settings

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:32:08 -0000

163 lines

New Thread

Full Electoral Register Use - ICO Guidance

Full Electoral Register Use - ICO Guidance

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Dec 2009 08:50:50 -0000

682 lines

New Thread

FW: Information Commissioner urges organisations to give individuals more privacy choices online

FW: Information Commissioner urges organisations to give individuals more privacy choices online

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:56:24 -0000

733 lines

New Thread

Fw: [data-protection] Tracing originator

Fw: [data-protection] Tracing originator

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Dec 2009 16:54:13 +0100

250 lines

New Thread

Information Commissioner's Office demystifies data protection

Re: Information Commissioner's Office demystifies data protection

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Dec 2009 11:38:18 +0000

44 lines

Re: Information Commissioner's Office demystifies data protection

Wiper, Carl <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Dec 2009 12:06:35 +0000

126 lines

New Thread

List Business - No longer a moderator/list owner

Re: List Business - No longer a moderator/list owner

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Dec 2009 09:57:14 -0000

590 lines

List Business - No longer a moderator/list owner

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Dec 2009 10:21:13 -0000

350 lines

New Thread

more on councils and planning apps / possible dry xmas humour

more on councils and planning apps / possible dry xmas humour

Mark van Harmelen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:27:59 +0000

88 lines

Re: more on councils and planning apps / possible dry xmas humour

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Dec 2009 19:02:18 -0000

204 lines

New Thread

New year resolution attachment filtering

New year resolution attachment filtering

Karen McCullagh <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:27:36 -0000

270 lines

Re: New year resolution attachment filtering

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:05:35 -0000

576 lines

New Thread

New year resolution attachment filtering[Scanned]

Re: New year resolution attachment filtering[Scanned]

Ronan Durnin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:08:55 -0000

511 lines

Re: New year resolution attachment filtering[Scanned]

Ronan Durnin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:14:32 -0000

819 lines

New Thread

Notification fee - Public Authority

Notification fee - Public Authority

Cotterill, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:00:52 -0000

206 lines

Re: Notification fee - Public Authority

Dinsdale, Peter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:09:16 -0000

796 lines

Re: Notification fee - Public Authority

Cotterill, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:29:39 -0000

902 lines

New Thread

Notification fee - Public Authority[Scanned]

Re: Notification fee - Public Authority[Scanned]

Ronan Durnin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:15:25 -0000

710 lines

Re: Notification fee - Public Authority[Scanned]

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:26:45 -0000

506 lines

New Thread

Notification Fees

Notification Fees

Matt Cooper <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:30:44 +0000

39 lines

Re: Notification Fees

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:54:42 -0000

88 lines

Re: Notification Fees

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:28:44 +0000

153 lines

Re: Notification Fees

Alan Stead <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Dec 2009 08:54:23 +0000

246 lines

Notification Fees

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:23:13 -0000

74 lines

Re: Notification Fees

Gibbs, Julie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:52:49 +0000

169 lines

New Thread

One last peice of humour - A promise

One last peice of humour - A promise

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:44:06 +0100

45 lines

New Thread

Photos of Staff - Reasonable Work Instruction

Photos of Staff - Reasonable Work Instruction

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:13:38 +0000

62 lines

Re: Photos of Staff - Reasonable Work Instruction

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:21:58 +0000

241 lines

Re: Photos of Staff - Reasonable Work Instruction

Giles, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:22:18 -0000

614 lines

Re: Photos of Staff - Reasonable Work Instruction

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:25:33 +0000

131 lines

Re: Photos of Staff - Reasonable Work Instruction

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:54:50 -0000

86 lines

Re: Photos of Staff - Reasonable Work Instruction

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:34:16 -0000

336 lines

Re: Photos of Staff - Reasonable Work Instruction

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:40:22 -0000

138 lines

Re: Photos of Staff - Reasonable Work Instruction

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:38:27 -0000

111 lines

Re: Photos of Staff - Reasonable Work Instruction

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:36:55 +0100

109 lines

Re: Photos of Staff - Reasonable Work Instruction

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:08:33 -0000

137 lines

Re: Photos of Staff - Reasonable Work Instruction

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:28:00 +0100

256 lines

Re: Photos of Staff - Reasonable Work Instruction

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:45:47 -0000

301 lines

New Thread

Postcodes request

Postcodes request

Matt Morrison <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Dec 2009 10:59:08 +0000

68 lines

Re: Postcodes request

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:16:30 -0000

147 lines

Re: Postcodes request

Matt Morrison <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:22:58 +0000

204 lines

Re: Postcodes request

Matt Morrison <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:26:29 +0000

159 lines

Re: Postcodes request

Dinsdale, Peter <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:31:18 -0000

180 lines

Re: Postcodes request

Giles, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:56:17 -0000

734 lines

New Thread

Prime Minister speaks: more FOI and more re-use and, by inference, less ID Card

Prime Minister speaks: more FOI and more re-use and, by inference, less ID Card

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Dec 2009 14:21:45 -0000

231 lines

New Thread

Publishing Pay scales

Publishing Pay scales

Kirkup,Stewart (Corporate Resources) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 12:38:36 -0000

62 lines

Re: Publishing Pay scales

DREW Nic <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 12:58:58 +0000

140 lines

Re: Publishing Pay scales

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:09:54 +0000

400 lines

Re: Publishing Pay scales

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:11:27 +0000

188 lines

Re: Publishing Pay scales

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:13:01 -0000

216 lines

Re: Publishing Pay scales

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:13:55 +0000

786 lines

Re: Publishing Pay scales

Lee Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:19:55 -0000

267 lines

Re: Publishing Pay scales

Kirkup,Stewart (Corporate Resources) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:28:23 -0000

323 lines

Re: Publishing Pay scales

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:15:40 +0000

120 lines

Re: Publishing Pay scales

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Dec 2009 10:16:22 -0000

80 lines

Re: Publishing Pay scales

Dodgson, Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Dec 2009 16:08:04 -0000

182 lines

Re: Publishing Pay scales

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Dec 2009 16:38:07 -0000

66 lines

New Thread

Publishing Pay scales[Scanned]

Re: Publishing Pay scales[Scanned]

Ronan Durnin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:39:59 -0000

364 lines

Re: Publishing Pay scales[Scanned]

Cotterill, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 15:09:15 -0000

423 lines

New Thread

Quiet

Quiet

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:14:46 +0000

30 lines

Re: Quiet

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:17:09 +0000

178 lines

Re: Quiet

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:37:35 -0000

62 lines

New Thread

s.33 research exemption

s.33 research exemption

Alison Ross-Dow <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:23:49 +0000

45 lines

Re: s.33 research exemption

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:41:12 +0000

118 lines

Re: s.33 research exemption

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Dec 2009 14:31:11 +0000

84 lines

New Thread

SAR about a SAR

SAR about a SAR

Matt Morrison <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Dec 2009 10:22:49 +0000

60 lines

Re: SAR about a SAR

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Dec 2009 11:03:59 -0000

108 lines

New Thread

school vetting rules

school vetting rules

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Dec 2009 10:54:38 +0000

92 lines

Re: school vetting rules

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:31:00 +0000

55 lines

New Thread

school vetting rules: ISA safeguarding rules use the wrong criteria

school vetting rules: ISA safeguarding rules use the wrong criteria

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:15:27 -0000

212 lines

New Thread

Section 33A of the DPA

Section 33A of the DPA

Gordon Wanless <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:05:38 +0000

98 lines

Re: Section 33A of the DPA

DREW Nic <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:19:53 +0000

181 lines

Re: Section 33A of the DPA

Alan Stead <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:48:20 +0000

225 lines

New Thread

Setting mail preference for the holiday season

Setting mail preference for the holiday season

Ronan Durnin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Dec 2009 12:40:59 -0000

399 lines

New Thread

Subject access to risk log

Subject access to risk log

Graeme Hawley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:38:10 +0000

66 lines

Re: Subject access to risk log

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:14:21 +0000

161 lines

Re: Subject access to risk log

Hawley, Graeme <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:22:40 -0000

730 lines

New Thread

Subject access to risk log[Scanned]

Re: Subject access to risk log[Scanned]

Ronan Durnin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:02:28 -0000

106 lines

New Thread

Surveillance society

Surveillance society

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:18:43 -0000

272 lines

Re: Surveillance society

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:25:39 +0000

304 lines

New Thread

Surveillance society What about Children's Act 1989 s.83 a database by another name?

Re: Surveillance society What about Children's Act 1989 s.83 a database by another name?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:55:40 +0000

846 lines

New Thread

Tracing originator

Tracing originator

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Dec 2009 18:26:00 +0100

80 lines

Re: Tracing originator

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Dec 2009 15:17:44 -0000

80 lines

New Thread

Viviane Reding picked reported as about to re-write EU data protection laws

Re: Viviane Reding picked reported as about to re-write EU data protection laws

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Dec 2009 14:42:21 +0000

43 lines

New Thread

We're all "miscreants"

We're all "miscreants"

Mark van Harmelen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:05:16 +0100

76 lines

Re: We're all "miscreants"

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:23:44 +0000

283 lines

New Thread

What to do if someone did not consent to a staff ID card photo?

What to do if someone did not consent to a staff ID card photo?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:37:38 +0000

852 lines

Re: What to do if someone did not consent to a staff ID card photo?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:46:13 +0000

214 lines

New Thread

Workplace Consequences of Electronic Exhibitionism and Voyeurism

Workplace Consequences of Electronic Exhibitionism and Voyeurism

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:29:30 +0100

62 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager