JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


December 2009


View:

Show Author | Hide Author

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject

From

Date Sorted by Date, Most Recent First

Size

Council worker suspended after disclosure of personal data about the vulnerable from social work files

chris pounder

Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:07:11 -0000

417 lines

Re: Postcodes request

Giles, Kevin

Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:56:17 -0000

734 lines

Are postcodes personal data?

chris pounder

Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:35:25 -0000

113 lines

Re: Postcodes request

Dinsdale, Peter

Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:31:18 -0000

180 lines

Re: Postcodes request

Matt Morrison

Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:26:29 +0000

159 lines

Re: Postcodes request

Matt Morrison

Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:22:58 +0000

204 lines

Re: Postcodes request

Scourfield, Brenda

Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:16:30 -0000

147 lines

Postcodes request

Matt Morrison

Tue, 22 Dec 2009 10:59:08 +0000

68 lines

Re: Notification fee - Public Authority

Cotterill, Steve

Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:29:39 -0000

902 lines

Re: Notification fee - Public Authority[Scanned]

Bradshaw, Phillip

Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:26:45 -0000

506 lines

Re: Notification fee - Public Authority[Scanned]

Ronan Durnin

Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:15:25 -0000

710 lines

Re: Notification fee - Public Authority

Dinsdale, Peter

Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:09:16 -0000

796 lines

Notification fee - Public Authority

Cotterill, Steve

Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:00:52 -0000

206 lines

Workplace Consequences of Electronic Exhibitionism and Voyeurism

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:29:30 +0100

62 lines

Re: An ewasy New Year Resolution (Presentation attached this time!)[Scanned]

Ronan Durnin

Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:38:31 -0000

805 lines

Re: New year resolution attachment filtering[Scanned]

Ronan Durnin

Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:14:32 -0000

819 lines

Re: New year resolution attachment filtering

Simon Howarth

Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:05:35 -0000

576 lines

Re: more on councils and planning apps / possible dry xmas humour

Bradshaw, Phillip

Sun, 20 Dec 2009 19:02:18 -0000

204 lines

more on councils and planning apps / possible dry xmas humour

Mark van Harmelen

Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:27:59 +0000

88 lines

Re: Section 33A of the DPA

Alan Stead

Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:48:20 +0000

225 lines

One last peice of humour - A promise

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:44:06 +0100

45 lines

Re: DP humour

Ibrahim Hasan

Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:43:28 +0000

412 lines

Re: An ewasy New Year Resolution (Presentation attached this time!)[Scanned]

Ronan Durnin

Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:37:58 -0000

639 lines

Re: Section 33A of the DPA

DREW Nic

Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:19:53 +0000

181 lines

Re: Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?

Lawrence Serewicz

Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:12:06 +0000

366 lines

Re: New year resolution attachment filtering[Scanned]

Ronan Durnin

Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:08:55 -0000

511 lines

Section 33A of the DPA

Gordon Wanless

Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:05:38 +0000

98 lines

Re: Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?

Scourfield, Brenda

Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:50:51 -0000

325 lines

Re: Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?

Mark van Harmelen

Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:41:19 +0000

792 lines

New year resolution attachment filtering

Karen McCullagh

Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:27:36 -0000

270 lines

Setting mail preference for the holiday season

Ronan Durnin

Fri, 18 Dec 2009 12:40:59 -0000

399 lines

An ewasy New Year Resolution (Presentation attached this time!)

Karen McCullagh

Fri, 18 Dec 2009 12:13:08 -0000

363 lines

Re: Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?

Maurice Frankel

Fri, 18 Dec 2009 12:03:13 +0000

951 lines

An easy New Year Resolution

Karen McCullagh

Fri, 18 Dec 2009 11:31:11 -0000

62 lines

DP humour

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 18 Dec 2009 12:22:56 +0100

321 lines

Commissioner to be questioned by MPs over poor performance

chris pounder

Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:45:49 -0000

265 lines

Re: CCTV hacked

Simon Howarth

Thu, 17 Dec 2009 21:39:49 -0000

600 lines

CCTV hacked

Ibrahim Hasan

Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:32:54 +0000

131 lines

Re: Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?

Maurice Frankel

Thu, 17 Dec 2009 17:22:22 +0000

778 lines

Re: Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?

Kevin Mulley

Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:47:07 +0000

90 lines

Re: Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?[Scanned]

Ronan Durnin

Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:42:51 -0000

298 lines

Re: Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:41:53 +0000

682 lines

Re: Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:26:33 +0000

260 lines

Re: Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?

Mark van Harmelen

Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:48:02 +0000

305 lines

Re: Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?

Bradshaw, Phillip

Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:14:40 -0000

143 lines

Re: Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?[Scanned]

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:53:30 +0000

166 lines

Re: Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?

Maurice Frankel

Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:53:12 +0000

120 lines

Re: Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?[Scanned]

Ronan Durnin

Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:10:46 -0000

127 lines

Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:30:32 +0000

80 lines

Re: Quiet

Bradshaw, Phillip

Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:37:35 -0000

62 lines

Re: Quiet

Tim Trent

Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:17:09 +0000

178 lines

Quiet

Brenda Scourfield

Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:14:46 +0000

30 lines

Re: Photos of Staff - Reasonable Work Instruction

Bradshaw, Phillip

Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:45:47 -0000

301 lines

Re: Photos of Staff - Reasonable Work Instruction

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:28:00 +0100

256 lines

Re: Photos of Staff - Reasonable Work Instruction

Bradshaw, Phillip

Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:08:33 -0000

137 lines

Re: Photos of Staff - Reasonable Work Instruction

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:36:55 +0100

109 lines

Re: Photos of Staff - Reasonable Work Instruction

Paul Ticher

Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:38:27 -0000

111 lines

Re: What to do if someone did not consent to a staff ID card photo?

Tim Trent

Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:46:13 +0000

214 lines

What to do if someone did not consent to a staff ID card photo?

Lawrence Serewicz

Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:37:38 +0000

852 lines

Re: Photos of Staff - Reasonable Work Instruction

Simon Howarth

Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:54:50 -0000

86 lines

Re: Photos of Staff - Reasonable Work Instruction

Bradshaw, Phillip

Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:40:22 -0000

138 lines

Re: Photos of Staff - Reasonable Work Instruction

Bradshaw, Phillip

Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:34:16 -0000

336 lines

Re: Photos of Staff - Reasonable Work Instruction

Lawrence Serewicz

Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:25:33 +0000

131 lines

Re: Photos of Staff - Reasonable Work Instruction

Giles, Kevin

Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:22:18 -0000

614 lines

Re: Photos of Staff - Reasonable Work Instruction

Tim Trent

Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:21:58 +0000

241 lines

Photos of Staff - Reasonable Work Instruction

Phil Bradshaw

Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:13:38 +0000

62 lines

Re: Notification Fees

Gibbs, Julie

Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:52:49 +0000

169 lines

Notification Fees

Bailey, Trish

Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:23:13 -0000

74 lines

school vetting rules: ISA safeguarding rules use the wrong criteria

chris pounder

Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:15:27 -0000

212 lines

Re: SAR about a SAR

Bradshaw, Phillip

Mon, 14 Dec 2009 11:03:59 -0000

108 lines

SAR about a SAR

Matt Morrison

Mon, 14 Dec 2009 10:22:49 +0000

60 lines

Re: DP Jokes. Was: Re: [data-protection] Surveillance society What about Children s Act 1989 s.83 a database by another name?

Simon Howarth

Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:31:18 -0000

349 lines

Re: school vetting rules

Roland Perry

Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:31:00 +0000

55 lines

school vetting rules

Ibrahim Hasan

Sun, 13 Dec 2009 10:54:38 +0000

92 lines

DP Jokes. Was: Re: [data-protection] Surveillance society What about Children s Act 1989 s.83 a database by another name?

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:02:15 +0100

310 lines

Re: Surveillance society What about Children's Act 1989 s.83 a database by another name?

Lawrence Serewicz

Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:55:40 +0000

846 lines

Re: Surveillance society

Tim Trent

Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:25:39 +0000

304 lines

Surveillance society

chris pounder

Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:18:43 -0000

272 lines

Re: Notification Fees

Alan Stead

Fri, 11 Dec 2009 08:54:23 +0000

246 lines

Re: Notification Fees

<>

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:28:44 +0000

153 lines

Re: Notification Fees

Bradshaw, Phillip

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:54:42 -0000

88 lines

Notification Fees

Matt Cooper

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:30:44 +0000

39 lines

Re: We're all "miscreants"

Tim Trent

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:23:44 +0000

283 lines

Re: Subject access to risk log

Hawley, Graeme

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:22:40 -0000

730 lines

Re: Subject access to risk log

<>

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:14:21 +0000

161 lines

We're all "miscreants"

Mark van Harmelen

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:05:16 +0100

76 lines

Re: Subject access to risk log[Scanned]

Ronan Durnin

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:02:28 -0000

106 lines

Subject access to risk log

Graeme Hawley

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:38:10 +0000

66 lines

Re: Facebook releases new privacy settings

Griffiths, Ian

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:32:08 -0000

163 lines

Re: Facebook releases new privacy settings

Chris Bayliss (ITS)

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:23:33 +0000

507 lines

Facebook releases new privacy settings

Tim Trent

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:46:09 +0000

161 lines

Re: s.33 research exemption

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 9 Dec 2009 14:31:11 +0000

84 lines

FW: Information Commissioner urges organisations to give individuals more privacy choices online

chris pounder

Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:56:24 -0000

733 lines

Re: s.33 research exemption

Lawrence Serewicz

Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:41:12 +0000

118 lines

s.33 research exemption

Alison Ross-Dow

Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:23:49 +0000

45 lines

Full Electoral Register Use - ICO Guidance

Bailey, Trish

Wed, 9 Dec 2009 08:50:50 -0000

682 lines

Data processor agreement and the next step?

Bailey, Trish

Tue, 8 Dec 2009 11:07:21 -0000

449 lines

Prime Minister speaks: more FOI and more re-use and, by inference, less ID Card

chris pounder

Mon, 7 Dec 2009 14:21:45 -0000

231 lines

Fw: [data-protection] Tracing originator

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 4 Dec 2009 16:54:13 +0100

250 lines

Re: Tracing originator

Bradshaw, Phillip

Fri, 4 Dec 2009 15:17:44 -0000

80 lines

Tracing originator

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 3 Dec 2009 18:26:00 +0100

80 lines

Re: Publishing Pay scales

Bradshaw, Phillip

Wed, 2 Dec 2009 16:38:07 -0000

66 lines

Re: Publishing Pay scales

Dodgson, Paul

Wed, 2 Dec 2009 16:08:04 -0000

182 lines

Re: Viviane Reding picked reported as about to re-write EU data protection laws

Roland Perry

Wed, 2 Dec 2009 14:42:21 +0000

43 lines

Re: Information Commissioner's Office demystifies data protection

Wiper, Carl

Wed, 2 Dec 2009 12:06:35 +0000

126 lines

Re: Information Commissioner's Office demystifies data protection

Phil Bradshaw

Wed, 2 Dec 2009 11:38:18 +0000

44 lines

List Business - No longer a moderator/list owner

Scourfield, Brenda

Wed, 2 Dec 2009 10:21:13 -0000

350 lines

Re: Publishing Pay scales

Bradshaw, Phillip

Wed, 2 Dec 2009 10:16:22 -0000

80 lines

Re: List Business - No longer a moderator/list owner

Simon Howarth

Wed, 2 Dec 2009 09:57:14 -0000

590 lines

Re: Publishing Pay scales[Scanned]

Cotterill, Steve

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 15:09:15 -0000

423 lines

Re: Publishing Pay scales[Scanned]

Ronan Durnin

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:39:59 -0000

364 lines

Re: Publishing Pay scales

Kirkup,Stewart (Corporate Resources)

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:28:23 -0000

323 lines

Re: Publishing Pay scales

Lee Gardiner

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:19:55 -0000

267 lines

Re: Publishing Pay scales

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:15:40 +0000

120 lines

Re: Publishing Pay scales

Lawrence Serewicz

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:13:55 +0000

786 lines

Re: Publishing Pay scales

Scourfield, Brenda

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:13:01 -0000

216 lines

Re: Publishing Pay scales

Lawrence Serewicz

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:11:27 +0000

188 lines

Re: Publishing Pay scales

Tim Trent

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:09:54 +0000

400 lines

Re: Publishing Pay scales

DREW Nic

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 12:58:58 +0000

140 lines

Publishing Pay scales

Kirkup,Stewart (Corporate Resources)

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 12:38:36 -0000

62 lines

About Logical Links in X-References.

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 12:11:18 +0100

45 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager