JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


October 2009


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

2011 census and bedroom privacy (14 messages)
An Apology (1 message)
Applying the Principles to the surveillance of a demonstration (1 message)
Binding Corporate Rules (1 message)
BNP membership list (5 messages)
Call Centre Recordings - customer right of access (6 messages)
Complaints outcomes (2 messages)
Corporate spam - protection under Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC directive) Regulations 2003 ? (4 messages)
Data Protection Act E-Learning Tool for Museums Now Freely Available (1 message)
Do privacy enhancing technologies have an Achilles Heel? (1 message)
DP Exemptions for auditing purposes (4 messages)
EC tender with a connection to data protection (1 message)
Equality monitoring and fair processing (4 messages)
FOI Update webcast (1 message)
Friday madness (2 messages)
FTC settles Safe Harbor claims (1 message)
Fwd: [data-protection] Sharing complaint data with third parties (2 messages)
Guardian article and surveillance stories (1 message)
How a £750 printer could affect everybody's privacy (6 messages)
I don't beleaf it (1 message)
ICO web site (4 messages)
In-House DP Training Guides and PowerPoint's (1 message)
Information Commissioner contemplates unpopularity (1 message)
information governance post (1 message)
INFORMATION GOVERNANCE POST AT COVENTRY CITY COUNCIL (1 message)
Knowing or reckless misuse of personal data - introducing custodial sentences (1 message)
Legal Guidance (2 messages)
My take on "police need not delete conviction data after all" (3 messages)
New Look Information Law Newsletter (1 message)
Offshore call centres and the PECR (6 messages)
Parental Access Request causing distress (2 messages)
Personal data posted' on town hall website (1 message)
Phorm - EU action ongoing. (1 message)
police need not delete conviction data after all (19 messages)
Privacy rights of the dead (5 messages)
PVP Register - Retention Period (2 messages)
Records held by "a cult" (1 message)
Reminder FOI Update webcast today at 10am (1 message)
SAR and the Mental Capacity Act (5 messages)
Sensitive personal data (8 messages)
Sharing complaint data with third parties (2 messages)
sharing data with system developers (37 messages)
sharing data with system developers[Scanned] (2 messages)
Silent calls (3 messages)
SMS Texting - Policy/Procedures and Asking for Permission (4 messages)
Thank you (and a bit of an advert) (1 message)
The All New JISC Legal Website – www.jisclegal.ac.uk - on YouTube (1 message)
Thousands of unsolicited faxes results in enforcement action (2 messages)
Training event: "Compliance...am I bovvered?" (1 message)
unsubscribe (1 message)
Vetting and Barring Scheme Annonced (1 message)
Vetting and Barring Scheme Announced (1 message)
Vetting and Barring Scheme Announced - link to getting a voluntary ID Cards (1 message)
Violent warning marker case (1 message)
We can't disclose because of the Human Rights Act (1 message)
Zurich loses customer data (2 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

2011 census and bedroom privacy

2011 census and bedroom privacy

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:03:03 +0000

129 lines

Re: 2011 census and bedroom privacy

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:42:42 +0000

46 lines

2011 census and bedroom privacy

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Oct 2009 08:17:56 -0000

34 lines

Re: 2011 census and bedroom privacy

Christine Catton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:51:15 +0000

265 lines

Re: 2011 census and bedroom privacy

Meredith Coney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:05:56 +0000

595 lines

Re: 2011 census and bedroom privacy

Dunster, Jon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:51:09 -0000

581 lines

Re: 2011 census and bedroom privacy

Broadfoot, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:04:03 -0000

859 lines

Re: 2011 census and bedroom privacy

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:29:55 +0000

460 lines

Re: 2011 census and bedroom privacy

Lee Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Oct 2009 09:04:13 -0000

631 lines

Re: 2011 census and bedroom privacy

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:16:57 +0000

542 lines

Re: 2011 census and bedroom privacy

Lee Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:46:07 -0000

614 lines

2011 census and bedroom privacy

Sara Owens <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:48:13 -0000

454 lines

Re: 2011 census and bedroom privacy

Dunster, Jon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:49:43 -0000

569 lines

Re: 2011 census and bedroom privacy

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:58:58 +0000

69 lines

New Thread

An Apology

Re: An Apology

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:15:25 +0100

172 lines

New Thread

Applying the Principles to the surveillance of a demonstration

Applying the Principles to the surveillance of a demonstration

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Oct 2009 09:49:31 -0000

264 lines

New Thread

Binding Corporate Rules

Binding Corporate Rules

Kevin Broadfoot <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:25:04 +0000

30 lines

New Thread

BNP membership list

BNP membership list

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 07:53:32 -0400

141 lines

Re: BNP membership list

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:00:32 +0100

282 lines

Re: BNP membership list

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:25:08 +0100

513 lines

Re: BNP membership list

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:47:50 +0100

622 lines

Re: BNP membership list

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:07:01 +0100

968 lines

New Thread

Call Centre Recordings - customer right of access

Call Centre Recordings - customer right of access

Clare Watts <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Oct 2009 09:45:40 +0100

48 lines

Re: Call Centre Recordings - customer right of access

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Oct 2009 10:03:55 +0100

263 lines

Re: Call Centre Recordings - customer right of access

Watts, Clare (C.) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Oct 2009 10:14:28 +0100

528 lines

Re: Call Centre Recordings - customer right of access

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Oct 2009 11:13:57 +0100

601 lines

Re: Call Centre Recordings - customer right of access

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Oct 2009 12:03:43 +0100

506 lines

Re: Call Centre Recordings - customer right of access

Watts, Clare (C.) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Oct 2009 12:32:44 +0100

561 lines

New Thread

Complaints outcomes

Complaints outcomes

Dominic Newton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:52:55 +0100

44 lines

Re: Complaints outcomes

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Oct 2009 11:05:49 +0100

102 lines

New Thread

Corporate spam - protection under Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC directive) Regulations 2003 ?

Corporate spam - protection under Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC directive) Regulations 2003 ?

Dunster, Jon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Oct 2009 11:46:52 +0100

421 lines

Re: Corporate spam - protection under Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC directive) Regulations 2003 ?

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Oct 2009 12:29:28 +0100

95 lines

Re: Corporate spam - protection under Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC directive) Regulations 2003 ?

James Walkom <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Oct 2009 12:49:02 +0100

114 lines

Re: Corporate spam - protection under Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC directive) Regulations 2003 ?

Chris Spray <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Oct 2009 22:53:28 +0100

514 lines

New Thread

Data Protection Act E-Learning Tool for Museums Now Freely Available

Data Protection Act E-Learning Tool for Museums Now Freely Available

Demb, Sarah <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:59:23 -0000

434 lines

New Thread

Do privacy enhancing technologies have an Achilles Heel?

Do privacy enhancing technologies have an Achilles Heel?

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Oct 2009 11:18:54 +0100

295 lines

New Thread

DP Exemptions for auditing purposes

DP Exemptions for auditing purposes

Ward, Ciaran <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:03:22 +0100

662 lines

Re: DP Exemptions for auditing purposes

Chris Spray <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Oct 2009 15:47:15 +0100

875 lines

Re: DP Exemptions for auditing purposes

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Oct 2009 16:39:30 +0100

211 lines

Re: DP Exemptions for auditing purposes

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:25:14 +0100

175 lines

New Thread

EC tender with a connection to data protection

EC tender with a connection to data protection

Healy, Susan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Oct 2009 09:56:22 +0100

193 lines

New Thread

Equality monitoring and fair processing

Equality monitoring and fair processing

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Oct 2009 15:49:59 +0100

82 lines

Re: Equality monitoring and fair processing

Ben Plouviez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Oct 2009 15:58:46 +0100

245 lines

Re: Equality monitoring and fair processing

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Oct 2009 16:15:56 +0100

204 lines

Re: Equality monitoring and fair processing

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Oct 2009 17:46:07 +0100

178 lines

New Thread

FOI Update webcast

FOI Update webcast

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Oct 2009 08:57:15 +0100

141 lines

New Thread

Friday madness

Friday madness

Mark van Harmelen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Oct 2009 21:03:35 +0100

76 lines

Friday madness

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Oct 2009 11:30:40 +0100

429 lines

New Thread

FTC settles Safe Harbor claims

FTC settles Safe Harbor claims

Kevin Broadfoot <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:51:04 +0100

37 lines

New Thread

Fwd: [data-protection] Sharing complaint data with third parties

Fwd: [data-protection] Sharing complaint data with third parties

Maurice Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:28:59 +0100

948 lines

Re: Fwd: [data-protection] Sharing complaint data with third parties

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:19:43 +0100

186 lines

New Thread

Guardian article and surveillance stories

Guardian article and surveillance stories

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:11:32 -0000

34 lines

New Thread

How a £750 printer could affect everybody's privacy

How a £750 printer could affect everybody's privacy

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:35:47 +0100

306 lines

Re: How a £750 printer could affect everybody's privacy

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:33:58 +0100

598 lines

Re: How a £750 printer could affect everybody's privacy

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:34:58 +0100

366 lines

Re: How a £750 printer could affect everybody's privacy

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:07:38 +0100

825 lines

Re: How a £750 printer could affect everybody's privacy

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:20:56 +0100

466 lines

Re: How a £750 printer could affect everybody's privacy

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:34:09 +0100

266 lines

New Thread

I don't beleaf it

I don't beleaf it

Wilson, Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Oct 2009 08:16:17 -0000

251 lines

New Thread

ICO web site

ICO web site

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Oct 2009 13:00:10 +0100

36 lines

Re: ICO web site

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Oct 2009 13:39:35 +0100

208 lines

Re: ICO web site

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Oct 2009 16:13:52 +0100

379 lines

Re: ICO web site

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Oct 2009 16:37:30 +0100

651 lines

New Thread

In-House DP Training Guides and PowerPoint's

In-House DP Training Guides and PowerPoint's

Paula Tighe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:54:18 +0100

430 lines

New Thread

Information Commissioner contemplates unpopularity

Information Commissioner contemplates unpopularity

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:48:33 -0000

284 lines

New Thread

information governance post

information governance post

Barbara Mulvihill <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:08:22 +0100

28 lines

New Thread

INFORMATION GOVERNANCE POST AT COVENTRY CITY COUNCIL

INFORMATION GOVERNANCE POST AT COVENTRY CITY COUNCIL

Harrison, Iain <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:21:23 +0100

468 lines

New Thread

Knowing or reckless misuse of personal data - introducing custodial sentences

Knowing or reckless misuse of personal data - introducing custodial sentences

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:08:31 +0100

255 lines

New Thread

Legal Guidance

Legal Guidance

DREW Nic <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Oct 2009 09:36:31 +0000

283 lines

Re: Legal Guidance

DREW Nic <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:47:42 +0000

808 lines

New Thread

My take on "police need not delete conviction data after all"

My take on "police need not delete conviction data after all"

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:14:52 +0100

222 lines

Re: My take on "police need not delete conviction data after all"

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:29:52 +0100

103 lines

Re: My take on "police need not delete conviction data after all"

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:11:59 +0100

139 lines

New Thread

New Look Information Law Newsletter

New Look Information Law Newsletter

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:37:26 +0100

128 lines

New Thread

Offshore call centres and the PECR

Offshore call centres and the PECR

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:26:16 +0100

173 lines

Re: Offshore call centres and the PECR

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:58:24 +0100

365 lines

Re: Offshore call centres and the PECR

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:12:20 +0100

707 lines

Re: Offshore call centres and the PECR

Giles, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Oct 2009 22:25:12 +0100

356 lines

Re: Offshore call centres and the PECR

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:49:33 +0100

455 lines

Re: Offshore call centres and the PECR

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Oct 2009 08:19:00 +0100

864 lines

New Thread

Parental Access Request causing distress

Parental Access Request causing distress

Sara Owens <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:54:15 -0000

334 lines

Re: Parental Access Request causing distress

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Oct 2009 16:18:25 -0000

455 lines

New Thread

Personal data posted' on town hall website

Personal data posted' on town hall website

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Oct 2009 11:02:14 -0000

106 lines

New Thread

Phorm - EU action ongoing.

Phorm - EU action ongoing.

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:52:08 +0100

35 lines

New Thread

police need not delete conviction data after all

police need not delete conviction data after all

Healy, Susan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:06:01 +0100

171 lines

Re: police need not delete conviction data after all

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:20:40 +0100

510 lines

Re: police need not delete conviction data after all

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:28:22 +0100

468 lines

Re: police need not delete conviction data after all

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:36:02 +0100

905 lines

Re: police need not delete conviction data after all

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:48:47 +0100

750 lines

Re: police need not delete conviction data after all

Antoinette Carter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:52:02 +0100

455 lines

Re: police need not delete conviction data after all

Giles, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:18:35 +0100

766 lines

Re: police need not delete conviction data after all

Antoinette Carter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:36:24 +0100

665 lines

Re: police need not delete conviction data after all

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:06:33 +0100

137 lines

Re: police need not delete conviction data after all

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:51:44 +0100

225 lines

Re: police need not delete conviction data after all

Ben Plouviez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:08:12 +0100

419 lines

Re: police need not delete conviction data after all

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:41:41 +0100

335 lines

Re: police need not delete conviction data after all

Ben Plouviez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:30:12 +0100

689 lines

Re: police need not delete conviction data after all

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:01:58 +0100

282 lines

Re: police need not delete conviction data after all

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:29:05 +0100

508 lines

Re: police need not delete conviction data after all

Ben Plouviez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:11:03 +0100

343 lines

Re: police need not delete conviction data after all

Dodgson, Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:57:20 +0100

537 lines

Re: police need not delete conviction data after all

Chell, Robert <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:37:07 +0100

523 lines

Re: police need not delete conviction data after all

Baines, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:11:40 +0100

428 lines

New Thread

Privacy rights of the dead

Privacy rights of the dead

Kevin Broadfoot <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:48:33 +0100

46 lines

Re: Privacy rights of the dead

Giles, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:54:12 +0100

533 lines

Re: Privacy rights of the dead

Andrew Charlesworth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:58:24 +0100

105 lines

Privacy rights of the dead

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:05:17 +0100

838 lines

Re: Privacy rights of the dead

Andrew Cormack <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:04:46 +0100

267 lines

New Thread

PVP Register - Retention Period

PVP Register - Retention Period

Jayne Langley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Oct 2009 09:44:53 +0000

46 lines

Re: PVP Register - Retention Period

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:39:00 -0000

96 lines

New Thread

Records held by "a cult"

Records held by "a cult"

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Oct 2009 17:21:18 +0100

45 lines

New Thread

Reminder FOI Update webcast today at 10am

Reminder FOI Update webcast today at 10am

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Oct 2009 08:09:06 +0100

43 lines

New Thread

SAR and the Mental Capacity Act

SAR and the Mental Capacity Act

Matt Morrison <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:26:18 +0100

61 lines

Re: SAR and the Mental Capacity Act

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:04:05 +0100

99 lines

Re: SAR and the Mental Capacity Act

Giles, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:07:02 +0100

641 lines

Re: SAR and the Mental Capacity Act

Matt Morrison <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:09:41 +0100

151 lines

Re: SAR and the Mental Capacity Act

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:02:11 +0100

146 lines

New Thread

Sensitive personal data

Sensitive personal data

GRAHAM Susan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Oct 2009 16:34:21 +0100

38 lines

Re: Sensitive personal data

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Oct 2009 16:50:54 +0100

84 lines

Re: Sensitive personal data

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Oct 2009 16:59:17 +0100

163 lines

Re: Sensitive personal data

J.S.M.Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Oct 2009 19:52:20 +0100

334 lines

Re: Sensitive personal data

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Oct 2009 07:53:22 +0100

41 lines

Re: Sensitive personal data

J.S.M.Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Oct 2009 19:07:13 +0100

49 lines

Re: Sensitive personal data

Harrison, Iain <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Oct 2009 09:17:02 +0100

126 lines

Re: Sensitive personal data

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Oct 2009 14:31:25 +0100

49 lines

New Thread

Sharing complaint data with third parties

Sharing complaint data with third parties

Meredith Coney <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:25:47 +0100

436 lines

Re: Sharing complaint data with third parties

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:36:34 +0100

480 lines

New Thread

sharing data with system developers

sharing data with system developers

Demb, Sarah <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Oct 2009 11:56:47 +0100

129 lines

Re: sharing data with system developers

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:28:59 +0100

281 lines

sharing data with system developers

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Oct 2009 13:04:50 +0100

349 lines

Re: sharing data with system developers

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Oct 2009 13:20:42 +0100

177 lines

Re: sharing data with system developers

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Oct 2009 13:23:47 +0100

259 lines

Re: sharing data with system developers

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Oct 2009 13:54:09 +0100

441 lines

Re: sharing data with system developers

Carol Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Oct 2009 14:33:40 +0100

629 lines

Re: sharing data with system developers

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Oct 2009 14:55:28 +0100

862 lines

Re: sharing data with system developers

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Oct 2009 14:55:23 +0100

640 lines

Re: sharing data with system developers

Dodgson, Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:14:43 +0100

269 lines

Re: sharing data with system developers

Demb, Sarah <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:28:43 +0100

578 lines

Re: sharing data with system developers

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:30:06 +0100

270 lines

Re: sharing data with system developers

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:32:33 +0100

198 lines

Re: sharing data with system developers

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Oct 2009 19:45:15 +0100

301 lines

Re: sharing data with system developers

Mark van Harmelen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Oct 2009 21:01:15 +0100

217 lines

Re: sharing data with system developers

Chris Spray <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Oct 2009 00:59:58 +0100

810 lines

Re: sharing data with system developers

Mark van Harmelen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Oct 2009 08:30:30 +0100

261 lines

Re: sharing data with system developers

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Oct 2009 09:03:29 +0100

419 lines

Re: sharing data with system developers

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Oct 2009 09:23:04 +0100

626 lines

Re: sharing data with system developers

Oakman Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Oct 2009 09:31:23 +0100

737 lines

Re: sharing data with system developers

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Oct 2009 09:34:36 +0100

445 lines

Re: sharing data with system developers

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Oct 2009 09:46:26 +0100

718 lines

Re: sharing data with system developers

Chris Spray <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Oct 2009 22:39:19 +0100

810 lines

Re: sharing data with system developers

Lee Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:59:19 +0100

286 lines

Re: sharing data with system developers

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:26:11 +0100

218 lines

Re: sharing data with system developers

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:24:23 +0100

592 lines

Re: sharing data with system developers

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:46:20 +0100

55 lines

Re: sharing data with system developers

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:08:20 +0100

720 lines

Re: sharing data with system developers

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:18:42 +0100

122 lines

Re: sharing data with system developers

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:20:40 +0100

170 lines

Re: sharing data with system developers

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:05:09 +0100

222 lines

Re: sharing data with system developers

Mark van Harmelen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:00:44 +0100

79 lines

Re: sharing data with system developers

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:24:39 +0100

289 lines

Re: sharing data with system developers

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Oct 2009 04:54:28 -0400

642 lines

Re: sharing data with system developers

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:34:49 +0100

285 lines

Re: sharing data with system developers

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Oct 2009 05:44:56 -0400

574 lines

Re: sharing data with system developers

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:51:58 +0100

557 lines

New Thread

sharing data with system developers[Scanned]

Re: sharing data with system developers[Scanned]

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Oct 2009 16:47:33 +0100

299 lines

Re: sharing data with system developers[Scanned]

Michael DOHERTY PSE 53852 <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Oct 2009 17:02:44 +0100

394 lines

New Thread

Silent calls

Silent calls

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Oct 2009 09:11:50 +0100

120 lines

Re: Silent calls

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:53:42 +0100

264 lines

Re: Silent calls

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:16:09 +0100

428 lines

New Thread

SMS Texting - Policy/Procedures and Asking for Permission

SMS Texting - Policy/Procedures and Asking for Permission

Paula Tighe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:07:43 -0000

533 lines

Re: SMS Texting - Policy/Procedures and Asking for Permission

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:28:16 +0000

255 lines

Re: SMS Texting - Policy/Procedures and Asking for Permission

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:52:36 -0000

675 lines

Re: SMS Texting - Policy/Procedures and Asking for Permission

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:09:54 -0000

210 lines

New Thread

Thank you (and a bit of an advert)

Thank you (and a bit of an advert)

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Oct 2009 14:51:00 +0100

44 lines

New Thread

The All New JISC Legal Website – www.jisclegal.ac.uk - on YouTube

The All New JISC Legal Website – www.jisclegal.ac.uk - on YouTube

John X Kelly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:08:11 +0000

132 lines

New Thread

Thousands of unsolicited faxes results in enforcement action

Thousands of unsolicited faxes results in enforcement action

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:58:35 +0100

224 lines

Re: Thousands of unsolicited faxes results in enforcement action

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:01:03 +0100

43 lines

New Thread

Training event: "Compliance...am I bovvered?"

Training event: "Compliance...am I bovvered?"

GRAHAM Susan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:00:34 -0000

71 lines

New Thread

unsubscribe

unsubscribe

Estrella-Pinto,Stuart (Corporate Resources) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Oct 2009 10:17:28 +0100

122 lines

New Thread

Vetting and Barring Scheme Annonced

Vetting and Barring Scheme Annonced

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Oct 2009 08:26:09 +0100

141 lines

New Thread

Vetting and Barring Scheme Announced

Re: Vetting and Barring Scheme Announced

Giles, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:29:11 +0100

719 lines

New Thread

Vetting and Barring Scheme Announced - link to getting a voluntary ID Cards

Vetting and Barring Scheme Announced - link to getting a voluntary ID Cards

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:10:34 +0100

704 lines

New Thread

Violent warning marker case

Violent warning marker case

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:49:08 +0100

272 lines

New Thread

We can't disclose because of the Human Rights Act

We can't disclose because of the Human Rights Act

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Oct 2009 12:04:09 +0100

335 lines

New Thread

Zurich loses customer data

Zurich loses customer data

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:45:56 +0100

50 lines

Re: Zurich loses customer data

Chris Spray <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Oct 2009 22:16:21 +0100

106 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager