JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for POETRYETC Archives


POETRYETC Archives

POETRYETC Archives


September 2009


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

POETRYETC Home

POETRYETC Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

Re: “Is Steven Burt’s “New Thing” all that New? ”

Desmond Swords <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Sep 2009 15:17:37 +0100

62 lines

“Is Steven Burt’s “New Thing” all that New?”

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Sep 2009 14:50:22 +0100

28 lines

"Obama"

Frederick Pollack <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Sep 2009 23:06:08 -0400

41 lines

"Shuffle"

Frederick Pollack <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Sep 2009 02:06:29 -0400

86 lines

"The Client"

Frederick Pollack <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:04:13 -0400

54 lines

Re: "The Client"

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:13:10 +0100

39 lines

Re: "The Client"

Frederick Pollack <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:30:08 -0400

56 lines

Re: "The Client"

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 09:00:52 -0600

32 lines

Re: "The Client"

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 09:04:32 -0600

82 lines

Re: "The Client"

Frederick Pollack <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 11:34:33 -0400

26 lines

Re: "The Client"

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:05:25 +1000

16 lines

Re: "The Client"

Frederick Pollack <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:18:40 -0400

26 lines

'Day' a new work by Kent Johnson

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Sep 2009 19:22:56 +0100

117 lines

Re: 'Day' a new work by Kent Johnson

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Sep 2009 05:57:48 +0100

155 lines

Re: 'Day' a new work by Kent Johnson

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Sep 2009 10:07:00 +0100

32 lines

Re: 'Day' a new work by Kent Johnson

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Sep 2009 12:18:11 +0100

62 lines

Re: 'Day' a new work by Kent Johnson

Desmond Swords <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Sep 2009 23:47:20 +0100

189 lines

Re: 'Day' a new work by Kent Johnson

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Sep 2009 19:08:33 -0400

82 lines

Re: 'Day' a new work by Kent Johnson

Desmond Swords <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Sep 2009 01:06:16 +0100

66 lines

Re: 'Day' a new work by Kent Johnson

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:37:15 +0100

18 lines

Re: 'Day' a new work by Kent Johnson

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:17:30 +0800

31 lines

Re: 'Day' a new work by Kent Johnson

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Sep 2009 08:25:41 -0600

54 lines

Re: 'Day' a new work by Kent Johnson

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Sep 2009 10:47:07 -0400

101 lines

Re: 'Day' a new work by Kent Johnson

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Sep 2009 10:58:54 -0400

68 lines

Re: 'Day' a new work by Kent Johnson

Kenneth Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:52:23 +0000

31 lines

Re: 'Day' a new work by Kent Johnson

Desmond Swords <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Sep 2009 22:25:52 +0100

26 lines

Re: 'Day' a new work by Kent Johnson

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 08:47:47 -0600

47 lines

Re: 'Day' a new work by Kent Johnson

Kenneth Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:55:13 +0000

90 lines

Re: 'Day' a new work by Kent Johnson

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:00:23 +0100

64 lines

Re: 'Day' a new work by Kent Johnson

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:08:32 +0100

101 lines

Re: 'Day' a new work by Kent Johnson

Ken Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:04:21 -0400

31 lines

Re: 'Day' a new work by Kent Johnson

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:07:05 -0400

34 lines

Re: 'Day' a new work by Kent Johnson

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:07:56 +0100

50 lines

Re: 'Day' a new work by Kent Johnson

Ken Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:10:33 -0400

19 lines

Re: 'Day' a new work by Kent Johnson????

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:22:45 -0700

140 lines

Re: 'Day' a new work by Kent Johnson????

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:42:46 +0100

159 lines

Re: 'Day' a new work by Kent Johnson????

Ken Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:06:54 -0400

19 lines

(delayed) snap

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Sep 2009 06:51:22 +0100

39 lines

Re: (delayed) snap

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Sep 2009 16:08:39 +1000

55 lines

Re: (delayed) snap

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Sep 2009 07:18:13 +0100

79 lines

Re: (delayed) snap

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Sep 2009 08:49:39 +0100

74 lines

Re: (delayed) snap

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Sep 2009 10:21:55 +0100

94 lines

Re: (delayed) snap

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Sep 2009 18:29:02 +0800

54 lines

Re: (delayed) snap

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Sep 2009 13:08:42 +0100

69 lines

Re: (delayed) snap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Sep 2009 11:16:20 -0600

34 lines

Re: (delayed) snap

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Sep 2009 07:55:20 +0100

52 lines

Re: (delayed) snap

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Sep 2009 08:02:23 +0100

80 lines

Re: (delayed) snap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Sep 2009 09:02:20 -0600

37 lines

... grace & delicacy, in the Zen sense

Séamas Cain <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Sep 2009 14:19:37 -0500

77 lines

... the poetry of pneumatic drills

Séamas Cain <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:57:51 -0500

65 lines

14 new poems online at Proximity

Janet Jackson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Sep 2009 15:15:34 +0800

54 lines

2 poems

Frederick Pollack <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Sep 2009 16:47:26 -0400

116 lines

Re: 2 poems

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Sep 2009 09:10:18 -0600

41 lines

Re: 2 poems

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Sep 2009 22:12:46 +0800

28 lines

Re: 2 poems

Frederick Pollack <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Sep 2009 22:15:43 -0400

36 lines

<No subject>

Frederick Pollack <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:32:28 -0400

11 lines

Alison's world tour (ltd)

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:27:17 +1000

123 lines

Re: Alison's world tour (ltd)

Peter <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:45:47 -0400

145 lines

Re: Alison's world tour (ltd)

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:35:18 +0100

139 lines

Re: Alison's world tour (ltd)

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:48:55 +0800

142 lines

Re: Alison's world tour (ltd)

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:07:00 +1000

160 lines

Re: Alison's world tour (ltd)

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:32:32 -0600

37 lines

and can I get away with this?

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:40:46 +1000

31 lines

Anne Waldman interview at The Argotist Online

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:15:43 +0200

13 lines

Re: Anne Waldman interview at The Argotist Online

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:02:27 -0700

17 lines

Re: Anne Waldman interview at The Argotist Online

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:43:05 +0100

28 lines

Apt "fables" about publishing/marketing

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Sep 2009 03:47:29 -0400

165 lines

Re: Arch linux, code, exchange of women

Desmond Swords <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Sep 2009 08:50:24 +0100

93 lines

Armitage article

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:35:17 +0800

32 lines

Re: Armitage article

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:58:58 +0100

51 lines

Re: Armitage article

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:18:16 -0600

76 lines

Re: Armitage article

halvard <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:21:48 -0500

97 lines

Re: Armitage article

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:17:17 +1000

132 lines

Re: Armitage article

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Sep 2009 10:53:51 +0800

149 lines

Re: Armitage article

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Sep 2009 06:48:29 +0100

188 lines

Re: Armitage article

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Sep 2009 08:36:19 -0600

60 lines

Re: Armitage article

Desmond Swords <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Sep 2009 08:21:11 +0100

52 lines

Re: Armitage article

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Sep 2009 15:01:03 +0100

65 lines

Beyond City Limits

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:43:50 +0800

28 lines

Re: Beyond City Limits

Angel Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Sep 2009 02:00:50 -0700

10 lines

Re: Beyond City Limits

Janet Jackson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:48:49 +0800

45 lines

Branch Snap

Brian Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Sep 2009 02:45:45 -0700

21 lines

Re: Branch Snap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Sep 2009 08:57:32 -0600

52 lines

Re: Branch Snap

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Sep 2009 17:27:38 +0100

40 lines

Re: Branch Snap

Brian Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:22:50 -0700

56 lines

chalk editions, hold the press, an addendum

peter ganick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Sep 2009 15:03:42 -0400

18 lines

Re: chalk editions, hold the press, an addendum

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Sep 2009 12:56:19 +0800

30 lines

Climate Change, dust & oceans

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 09:44:46 -0700

48 lines

Cold World

Dominic Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:29:28 +0100

43 lines

Re: Cold World

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:04:32 -0400

53 lines

Re: Cold World

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:30:20 -0600

78 lines

Re: Cold World

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:57:21 +0100

58 lines

Re: Cold World

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:36:59 +0100

59 lines

Re: Cold World

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Sep 2009 18:01:15 +0100

82 lines

Re: Cold World

Dominic Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Sep 2009 19:14:46 +0100

20 lines

Coming to Edmonton and other places near you...

Heather Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Sep 2009 09:18:54 -0600

28 lines

Confession Snap

Brian Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:47:38 -0700

34 lines

Re: Confession Snap

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:06:37 -0400

44 lines

Re: Confession Snap

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:25:54 +0100

56 lines

Re: Confession Snap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:18:47 -0600

34 lines

Re: Confession Snap

Brian Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:03:53 -0700

72 lines

Contemporary Aboriginal Art in Washington DC

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:52:53 +0100

62 lines

Re: Contemporary Aboriginal Art in Washington DC

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 2009 12:00:47 -0400

67 lines

Controversy & Debate

Séamas Cain <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Sep 2009 11:13:02 -0500

80 lines

D Larsen, B Brown, CA Conrad, Frank Sherlock = New de blog

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:51:25 -0700

21 lines

Desmond Swords Strikes Again

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:05:22 +0100

52 lines

Re: Desmond Swords Strikes Again

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:13:41 -0600

50 lines

Re: Desmond Swords Strikes Again

Desmond Swords <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Sep 2009 00:30:27 +0100

80 lines

Re: Desmond Swords Strikes Again

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Sep 2009 01:06:41 +0100

124 lines

Re: Desmond Swords Strikes Again

Desmond Swords <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Sep 2009 01:54:34 +0100

52 lines

Re: Desmond Swords Strikes Again

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Sep 2009 02:15:03 +0100

72 lines

Re: Desmond Swords Strikes Again

Desmond Swords <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Sep 2009 03:48:45 +0100

78 lines

differing reviews, and the prospect of the guillotine (was RE: two wildly varying reviews)

Rachel Loden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Sep 2009 10:15:25 -0700

143 lines

Diverse words of people and country at Perth Poetry Club this Sat 5 Sep with Derek Fenton and Karla Hart

Janet Jackson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Sep 2009 18:27:37 +0800

77 lines

Does visual poetry have semantic limitations?

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:27:39 +0200

12 lines

Re: Does visual poetry have semantic limitations?

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Sep 2009 10:31:56 -0500

37 lines

Re: Does visual poetry have semantic limitations?

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:37:04 -0400

37 lines

Re: Does visual poetry have semantic limitations?

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Sep 2009 08:46:36 -0700

68 lines

Re: Does visual poetry have semantic limitations?

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:41:16 -0700

110 lines

Re: Does visual poetry have semantic limitations?

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:45:40 +0100

100 lines

Re: Does visual poetry have semantic limitations?

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:46:39 +0100

151 lines

Re: Does visual poetry have semantic limitations?

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:09:08 -0700

162 lines

Re: Does visual poetry have semantic limitations?

Catherine Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:48:20 -0700

27 lines

Re: Does visual poetry have semantic limitations?

Angel Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:58:01 -0700

20 lines

Re: Does visual poetry have semantic limitations?

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 08:38:57 -0600

59 lines

Re: Does visual poetry have semantic limitations?

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:39:20 +0100

45 lines

Doing the same thing twice expecting different results

Ken Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:55:15 -0400

24 lines

Re: Doing the same thing twice expecting different results

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 2009 09:08:26 -0600

46 lines

downdraft

Jim Bennett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Sep 2009 08:46:19 +0100

22 lines

Re: downdraft

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:27:08 -0600

47 lines

dust storm lily

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:20:32 +1000

19 lines

Re: dust storm lily

Brian Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 02:27:45 -0700

34 lines

Re: dust storm lily

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:50:22 +1000

21 lines

Re: dust storm lily

Brian Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Sep 2009 02:17:58 -0700

40 lines

Re: dust storm lily

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:25:24 +1000

35 lines

Frankfurt Bookfair bows to China

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Sep 2009 08:55:40 +0100

24 lines

Re: Frankfurt Bookfair bows to China

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:12:23 +0100

40 lines

Re: Frankfurt Bookfair bows to China

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:20:29 +0100

60 lines

Re: Frankfurt Bookfair bows to China

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Sep 2009 11:21:33 +0100

75 lines

Frogs Snap

Brian Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Sep 2009 02:09:07 -0700

27 lines

Re: Frogs Snap

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:51:28 -0400

49 lines

FW: London Magazine

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Sep 2009 09:59:10 +0100

24 lines

Fwd: Digital Artifact: Issue Three

Catherine Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Sep 2009 10:14:49 -0700

49 lines

Fwd: Replacement of garbled announcement--hope this is clearer. Apologies

Michael Heller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:46:24 -0400

120 lines

Fwd: Request for Ecological Writing--Submissions for New Blog

Catherine Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Sep 2009 16:28:29 -0700

159 lines

happy snap

Janet Jackson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:04:48 +0800

37 lines

Re: happy snap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Sep 2009 08:39:32 -0600

62 lines

Re: Heller and King read at Prose Pros

Michael Heller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:38:01 -0400

70 lines

High Plains

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Sep 2009 13:47:38 -0500

51 lines

Re: High Plains

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:19:03 -0700

67 lines

Re: High Plains

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Sep 2009 13:23:54 -0600

41 lines

Instead of a snap

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:53:07 +0100

24 lines

Re: Instead of a snap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:34:03 -0600

51 lines

Re: Instead of a snap

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:09:36 +0100

76 lines

Re: Instead of a snap

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:56:44 +0100

44 lines

Re: Instead of a snap

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:04:47 +0100

67 lines

Re: Instead of a snap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:19:30 -0600

108 lines

Re: Instead of a snap

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:35:02 +0100

118 lines

Interview with David Meltzer about Rockpile

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:54:57 +0200

14 lines

Invitation to an opening reception

Peter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Sep 2009 20:18:41 -0400

90 lines

Re: Invitation to an opening reception

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Sep 2009 01:38:54 -0400

115 lines

Re: Invitation to an opening reception

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Sep 2009 11:09:12 -0600

135 lines

Larry Sawyer and Peter Manson poems at The Argotist Online

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:20:03 +0200

16 lines

late pat snap:-) ! _)-(_ ! Thursday, 03 September 2009

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Sep 2009 09:31:37 +0100

20 lines

Re: late pat snap:-) ! _)-(_ ! Thursday, 03 September 2009

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Sep 2009 12:35:24 +0300

27 lines

Re: late pat snap:-) ! _)-(_ ! Thursday, 03 September 2009

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Sep 2009 09:12:07 -0600

43 lines

Lawrence Upton at 60

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:57:33 +0100

33 lines

Re: Lawrence Upton at 60

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:19:52 -0600

57 lines

Re: Lawrence Upton at 60

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:23:05 +0100

27 lines

Re: Lawrence Upton at 60

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:11:10 +1000

37 lines

Re: Lawrence Upton at 60

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Sep 2009 10:24:21 +0100

66 lines

London Magazine

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Sep 2009 09:57:39 +0100

24 lines

Re: London Magazine

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Sep 2009 12:35:01 +0300

31 lines

Re: London Magazine

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Sep 2009 17:46:25 +0100

47 lines

Mahon from Goa

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Sep 2009 06:16:53 +0100

21 lines

Makes me weep....

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:25:34 -0400

15 lines

Re: Makes me weep....

Angel Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:45:03 -0700

23 lines

Re: Makes me weep....

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:22:11 -0400

31 lines

Re: Makes me weep....

Angel Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:25:51 -0700

14 lines

Re: Makes me weep....

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:05:14 +0300

23 lines

Margaret Griffiths (grasshopper)

Roger Collett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Sep 2009 16:41:25 +0100

19 lines

Max snaps: spring / orchards

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Sep 2009 06:18:54 +1000

59 lines

Media release: Perth Poetry Club's footy alternative; Poetry at Perth Cultural Centre Markets, Fremantle, Willagee

Janet Jackson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:51:56 +0800

104 lines

Media release: Poetic theatrics with AFEIF ISMAIL & VIVIENNE GLANCE at Perth Poetry Club

Janet Jackson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:51:05 +0800

82 lines

Meditations in a Time of Delusions and Lies – 30

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:39:40 -0700

106 lines

Re: Meditations in a Time of Delusions and Lies – 30

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:16:38 -0600

50 lines

melbourne launch

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:55:49 +1000

46 lines

Melbourne's amazing SANTO CAZZATI this Sat 19 Sep at Perth Poetry Club

Janet Jackson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:06:20 +0800

99 lines

Melbournians

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:35:33 +0800

22 lines

memory snap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:14:42 -0600

39 lines

Re: memory snap

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:48:08 -0700

48 lines

Re: memory snap

Frederick Pollack <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:00:36 -0400

31 lines

Naive Performance Snapped

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Sep 2009 23:08:31 +0100

52 lines

Re: Naive Performance Snapped

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:10:04 +0100

66 lines

Re: Naive Performance Snapped

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:45:25 +0100

65 lines

Re: Naive Performance Snapped

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Sep 2009 08:41:31 -0600

35 lines

Re: Naive Performance Snapped

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:34:16 +0100

89 lines

Re: Naive Performance Snapped

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:51:35 +0100

51 lines

Re: Naive Performance Snapped

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:36:14 -0700

20 lines

Re: Naive Performance Snapped

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:45:57 -0600

51 lines

New blog post: 'Another Day for Kent Johnson'

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Sep 2009 03:46:43 +0200

31 lines

New de blog/ Plane tree "haptics" &

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Sep 2009 13:20:17 -0700

25 lines

New poetry from the Rinn Gaeltacht

Séamas Cain <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:04:39 -0500

78 lines

NEW press' first 7 titles.

peter ganick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Sep 2009 13:49:43 -0400

59 lines

noble titles for sale

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:59:54 +1000

36 lines

Notice: Mudlark

William Slaughter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Sep 2009 20:35:42 -0400

39 lines

pat snap snap snap _-_*_-_ Wednesday, 30 September 2009

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:07:40 +0100

31 lines

Re: pat snap snap snap _-_*_-_ Wednesday, 30 September 2009

Brian Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Sep 2009 02:16:49 -0700

47 lines

Re: pat snap snap snap _-_*_-_ Wednesday, 30 September 2009

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:53:03 -0400

37 lines

Pat Snap _-^*^*^*^*-_ Wednesday, 02 September 2009

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Sep 2009 09:01:38 +0100

27 lines

Re: Pat Snap _-^*^*^*^*-_ Wednesday, 02 September 2009

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Sep 2009 09:29:27 -0600

32 lines

pat snap _-_+-_-+_-_09-09-09

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Sep 2009 06:25:04 +0100

34 lines

Re: pat snap _-_+-_-+_-_09-09-09

Angel Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Sep 2009 22:30:56 -0700

52 lines

Re: pat snap _-_+-_-+_-_09-09-09

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Sep 2009 07:50:17 +0100

75 lines

Re: pat snap _-_+-_-+_-_09-09-09

Angel Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Sep 2009 00:05:03 -0700

95 lines

Perth Poetry Club: 12 Sep WRONG WORDS, 19 Sep SANTO CAZZATI (MELBOURNE)

Janet Jackson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Sep 2009 01:25:29 +0800

79 lines

peter paul and goodbye mary

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:15:14 +1000

16 lines

Re: peter paul and goodbye mary

Ken Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:31:53 -0400

28 lines

Poem by Alex Davies at The Argotist Online

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Sep 2009 20:57:29 +0200

12 lines

Poems by Pam Brown at the The Argotist Online

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:06:19 +0200

13 lines

Poets & Artists “Self Portrait Issue

Peter <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Sep 2009 22:37:42 -0400

23 lines

Re: Poets & Artists “Self Portrait Issue

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Sep 2009 15:40:12 +0800

35 lines

Re: Poets & Artists “Self Portrait Issue

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Sep 2009 00:55:11 -0700

12 lines

Re: Poets & Artists “Self Portrait Issue

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Sep 2009 08:48:51 -0600

52 lines

Poland Poetry Reading

Millicent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Sep 2009 09:44:39 -0400

23 lines

Re: Poland Poetry Reading

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Sep 2009 09:23:52 -0600

56 lines

printing out pamphlet help...

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Sep 2009 11:34:01 -0400

18 lines

Re: printing out pamphlet help...

Roger Collett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Sep 2009 16:46:42 +0100

36 lines

Re: printing out pamphlet help...

deborah russell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Sep 2009 09:06:36 -0700

66 lines

Re: printing out pamphlet help...

Roger Collett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Sep 2009 17:19:27 +0100

51 lines

Re: printing out pamphlet help...

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Sep 2009 17:58:29 +0100

49 lines

Re: printing out pamphlet help...

Angel Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Sep 2009 14:13:20 -0700

44 lines

Re: printing out pamphlet help...

Angel Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Sep 2009 14:32:34 -0700

51 lines

Re: printing out pamphlet help...

Angel Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Sep 2009 14:35:26 -0700

11 lines

Re: printing out pamphlet help...

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Sep 2009 08:18:30 +0100

27 lines

Re: printing out pamphlet help...

Roger Collett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Sep 2009 08:42:21 +0100

45 lines

Re: printing out pamphlet help...

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Sep 2009 09:43:32 +0100

68 lines

Re: printing out pamphlet help...

Roger Collett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Sep 2009 09:57:00 +0100

22 lines

Re: printing out pamphlet help...

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Sep 2009 12:26:43 -0400

20 lines

Re: printing out pamphlet help...

Angel Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Sep 2009 21:02:40 -0700

41 lines

Re: printing out pamphlet help...

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Sep 2009 03:26:29 -0400

51 lines

Re: printing out pamphlet help...

Angel Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Sep 2009 00:30:56 -0700

59 lines

Re: printing out pamphlet help...

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Sep 2009 16:40:31 +0800

75 lines

Re: printing out pamphlet help...

Angel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Sep 2009 02:23:28 -0700

86 lines

Prynne on "Tintern Abbey"

Dominic Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Sep 2009 19:43:34 +0100

17 lines

Re: Prynne on "Tintern Abbey"

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Sep 2009 21:31:19 +0100

35 lines

Re: Prynne on "Tintern Abbey"

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Sep 2009 11:26:56 -0600

44 lines

Re: Prynne on "Tintern Abbey"

Dominic Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Sep 2009 22:00:26 +0100

71 lines

Re: Prynne on "Tintern Abbey"

Roger Collett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Sep 2009 22:08:01 +0100

85 lines

Re: Prynne on "Tintern Abbey"

Desmond Swords <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Sep 2009 03:54:31 +0100

40 lines

Re: Prynne on "Tintern Abbey"

Dominic Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Sep 2009 22:26:41 +0100

10 lines

query

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:13:04 -0400

15 lines

Re: query

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:16:02 -0500

39 lines

Re: query

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:32:13 -0500

65 lines

Re: query

Caleb Cluff <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Sep 2009 10:51:41 +1000

26 lines

Re: query

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Sep 2009 00:51:17 -0400

42 lines

Re: query

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Sep 2009 08:22:55 -0600

91 lines

Re: query

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:39:01 +0100

33 lines

Re: Rachel Loden aloud plus (ach!) a new reading announcement

Rachel Loden <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Sep 2009 04:06:38 -0700

107 lines

Rachel Loden aloud!

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:03:47 -0600

33 lines

Re: Rachel Loden aloud!

Rachel Loden <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Sep 2009 09:12:19 -0700

53 lines

Re: Rachel Loden aloud!

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Sep 2009 10:48:16 +0800

77 lines

Re: Rachel Loden aloud!

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Sep 2009 07:25:53 +0100

86 lines

Re: Rachel Loden aloud!

Rachel Loden <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Sep 2009 03:29:52 -0700

118 lines

Rae Armantrout & Rachel Loden in Los Angeles

Rachel Loden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Sep 2009 05:40:37 -0700

24 lines

Re: Rae Armantrout & Rachel Loden in Los Angeles

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Sep 2009 22:03:13 +0800

34 lines

Re: Rae Armantrout & Rachel Loden in Los Angeles

Rachel Loden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Sep 2009 07:25:15 -0700

50 lines

Re: Rae Armantrout & Rachel Loden in Los Angeles

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Sep 2009 22:31:27 +0800

61 lines

Re: Rae Armantrout & Rachel Loden in Los Angeles

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Sep 2009 11:35:34 -0600

48 lines

Re: Rae Armantrout & Rachel Loden in Los Angeles

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Sep 2009 07:08:13 +0100

79 lines

Re: Rae Armantrout & Rachel Loden in Los Angeles

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Sep 2009 08:59:28 +0100

94 lines

Reading forthcoming

Ken Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Sep 2009 21:18:00 -0400

27 lines

Re: Reading forthcoming

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:04:05 +0800

38 lines

Re: Reading forthcoming

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:07:54 +0100

45 lines

Re: Reading forthcoming

Angel Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Sep 2009 01:11:43 -0700

50 lines

Re: Reading forthcoming

Ken Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:30:02 -0400

25 lines

Re: Reading forthcoming

Ken Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:40:51 -0400

36 lines

Re: Reading forthcoming

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:53:42 +0100

55 lines

Re: Request for Ecological Writing--Submissions for New Blog

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Sep 2009 08:42:19 +0800

27 lines

Re: Request for Ecological Writing--Submissions for New Blog

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Sep 2009 10:48:33 +1000

50 lines

Re: Request for Ecological Writing--Submissions for New Blog

Catherine Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Sep 2009 22:12:15 -0700

18 lines

Re: Request for Ecological Writing--Submissions for New Blog

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Sep 2009 09:07:54 -0600

46 lines

Seriously, now...Macbeth

Ken Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:24:29 -0400

36 lines

Re: Seriously, now...Macbeth

Ken Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:30:33 -0400

14 lines

Re: Seriously, now...Macbeth

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:40:08 +1000

59 lines

Re: Seriously, now...Macbeth

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:01:27 -0400

74 lines

Re: Seriously, now...Macbeth

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:10:07 +0100

113 lines

Re: Seriously, now...Macbeth

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:26:55 +1000

151 lines

Re: Seriously, now...Macbeth

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:41:47 +0100

132 lines

Re: Seriously, now...Macbeth

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:28:52 -0600

63 lines

Re: Seriously, now...Macbeth

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:50:47 -0600

38 lines

Re: Seriously, now...Macbeth

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:28:25 +0100

158 lines

snap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Sep 2009 11:31:02 -0600

29 lines

Snap

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Sep 2009 19:18:28 +0100

23 lines

Re: Snap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:40:07 -0600

47 lines

Re: Snap

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Sep 2009 22:40:42 +0100

69 lines

Re: snap

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:22:31 +0100

53 lines

Re: snap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Sep 2009 20:47:56 -0600

81 lines

Re: snap

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:17:02 +0100

44 lines

Re: snap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:12:40 -0600

36 lines

snap

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:32:06 +0800

15 lines

Re: snap

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:29:46 +0100

36 lines

Snap (this happened Monday night)

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:05:45 +0100

23 lines

Re: Snap (this happened Monday night)

Frederick Pollack <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:15:06 -0400

37 lines

Re: Snap (this happened Monday night)

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:23:31 +0100

60 lines

Re: Snap (this happened Monday night)

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:42:07 -0700

74 lines

Re: Snap (this happened Monday night)

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:06:47 +0100

42 lines

Re: Snap (this happened Monday night)

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:19:13 +0100

71 lines

Re: Snap (this happened Monday night)

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:19:46 +0100

94 lines

Re: Snap (this happened Monday night)

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:05:29 -0400

32 lines

Re: Snap (this happened Monday night)

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Sep 2009 07:44:17 +0100

51 lines

Re: Snap (this happened Monday night)

Brian Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:59:20 -0700

83 lines

Re: Snap (this happened Monday night)

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:06:09 +0100

104 lines

Re: Snap (this happened Monday night)

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:12:40 +0100

57 lines

Re: Snap (this happened Monday night)

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Sep 2009 03:39:01 -0400

79 lines

Re: Snap (this happened Monday night)

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:08:17 +0100

112 lines

Re: Snap (this happened Monday night)

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:37:20 -0600

47 lines

Re: Snap (this happened Monday night)

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:38:56 -0600

32 lines

Snap (with a flash)

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Sep 2009 22:39:27 +0100

30 lines

Re: Snap (with a flash)

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:36:38 +0100

47 lines

Re: Snap (with a flash)

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 2009 09:22:42 -0400

54 lines

Re: Snap (with a flash)

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 2009 08:52:31 -0600

46 lines

Re: Snap (with a flash)

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:12:20 +0100

72 lines

Re: Snap (with a flash)

Desmond Swords <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 2009 21:24:27 +0100

29 lines

Re: Snap (with a flash)

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Sep 2009 06:09:21 +0100

54 lines

Re: Snap (with a flash)

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Sep 2009 21:01:56 +0100

54 lines

Re: Snap (with a flash)

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Sep 2009 11:31:10 +1000

32 lines

Re: Snap (with a flash)

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:01:15 +0300

47 lines

Re: Snap (with a flash)

Desmond Swords <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Sep 2009 22:15:00 +0100

57 lines

Re: Snap (with a flash)

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 06:54:30 +0100

76 lines

Re: Snap (with a flash)

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:55:01 +1000

78 lines

Re: Snap (with a flash)

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 08:29:21 +0100

101 lines

Re: Snap (with a flash)

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 08:38:30 +0100

88 lines

Re: Snap (with a flash)

Desmond Swords <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:13:44 +0100

140 lines

Snap - Vincent

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Sep 2009 10:35:39 -0700

36 lines

Re: Snap - Vincent

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Sep 2009 19:31:04 +0100

62 lines

Re: Snap - Vincent

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Sep 2009 08:39:35 -0600

67 lines

Snap - Vincent

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:46:00 -0700

24 lines

Re: Snap - Vincent

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:27:18 +0100

91 lines

Re: Snap - Vincent

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:39:57 -0700

114 lines

Re: Snap - Vincent

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:54:46 -0600

39 lines

Re: Snap - Vincent

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:00:19 -0600

47 lines

snap bass

Tina Bass <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Sep 2009 21:55:31 +0000

18 lines

Re: snap bass

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Sep 2009 17:05:16 -0600

43 lines

Re: snap bass

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:09:20 +0800

55 lines

Re: snap bass

Tina Bass <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:38:14 +0000

80 lines

snap bass

Tina Bass <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:16:25 +0000

37 lines

Re: snap bass

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:09:02 +0100

52 lines

Re: snap bass

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:38:05 -0600

34 lines

snap larghetto in C mantra esque drone

Angel Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Sep 2009 23:30:46 -0700

11 lines

snap pat +=+=+=Wednesday, 16 September 2009

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:35:41 +0100

36 lines

Re: snap pat +=+=+=Wednesday, 16 September 2009

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:13:07 +0300

42 lines

Re: snap pat +=+=+=Wednesday, 16 September 2009

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:28:35 -0600

34 lines

snap pat _-^*^*^*^-_Wednesday, 23 September 2009

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:28:28 +0100

26 lines

Re: snap pat _-^*^*^*^-_Wednesday, 23 September 2009

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 2009 09:09:15 -0600

48 lines

Re: snap pat _-^*^*^*^-_Wednesday, 23 September 2009

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:13:33 +0100

65 lines

Re: snap pat _-^*^*^*^-_Wednesday, 23 September 2009

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:42:37 -0400

71 lines

Re: snap pat _-^*^*^*^-_Wednesday, 23 September 2009

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:16:49 +0100

43 lines

Re: snap pat _-^*^*^*^-_Wednesday, 23 September 2009

Brian Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:30:26 -0700

44 lines

Re: snap pat _-^*^*^*^-_Wednesday, 23 September 2009

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Sep 2009 19:25:49 +0300

55 lines

Re: snap pat _-^*^*^*^-_Wednesday, 23 September 2009

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Sep 2009 09:57:12 +0800

70 lines

Re: snap pat _-^*^*^*^-_Wednesday, 23 September 2009

Brian Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Sep 2009 19:53:18 -0700

90 lines

Re: snap pat _-^*^*^*^-_Wednesday, 23 September 2009

Brian Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Sep 2009 19:57:31 -0700

108 lines

Re: snap pat _-^*^*^*^-_Wednesday, 23 September 2009

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Sep 2009 09:45:20 +0100

102 lines

Re: snap pat _-^*^*^*^-_Wednesday, 23 September 2009

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:05:49 +0300

112 lines

Re: snap pat _-^*^*^*^-_Wednesday, 23 September 2009

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:55:19 +0100

131 lines

Re: snap pat _-^*^*^*^-_Wednesday, 23 September 2009

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:47:53 +0300

137 lines

snap plan b

Angel Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Sep 2009 00:48:26 -0700

68 lines

Re: snap plan b

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Sep 2009 04:47:22 -0400

77 lines

Re: snap plan b

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Sep 2009 12:33:56 +0300

80 lines

Re: snap plan b

Angel Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Sep 2009 11:39:06 -0700

91 lines

Snap shots

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Sep 2009 18:36:56 +0100

32 lines

Re: Snap shots

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Sep 2009 10:27:44 +0800

44 lines

Re: Snap shots

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Sep 2009 10:25:45 +0100

70 lines

Re: Snap shots

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Sep 2009 11:54:35 +0100

85 lines

snap: facetiously self righteous

Angel Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:37:10 -0700

21 lines

snap: something or other

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Sep 2009 07:04:00 +1000

57 lines

Re: snap: something or other

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Sep 2009 10:13:04 +0800

20 lines

Re: snap: something or other

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Sep 2009 09:03:27 -0600

37 lines

Re: snap: something or other

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Sep 2009 17:49:58 +0100

73 lines

snap: spring

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 2009 06:52:52 +1000

62 lines

Re: snap: spring

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:58:22 -0700

72 lines

Re: snap: spring

Brian Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:43:28 -0700

77 lines

Re: snap: spring

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:30:36 +0100

78 lines

Re: snap: spring

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:32:52 +0300

72 lines

Re: snap: spring

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 2009 08:47:52 -0600

35 lines

Re: snap: spring

Tina Bass <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:39:59 +0000

104 lines

snap: street sights

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Sep 2009 06:13:40 +1000

62 lines

Re: snap: street sights

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:23:53 +0100

77 lines

Re: snap: street sights

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:11:10 -0600

36 lines

snap: TO GROW OR NOT TO GROW

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 2009 06:24:27 -0400

54 lines

Re: snap: TO GROW OR NOT TO GROW

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:36:59 +0100

70 lines

Re: snap: TO GROW OR NOT TO GROW

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:44:11 -0400

75 lines

SNAPPED WITHIN A JAPANESE EDITING ROOM

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 2009 18:44:43 +0100

27 lines

Re: SNAPPED WITHIN A JAPANESE EDITING ROOM

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:24:24 +0800

39 lines

Re: SNAPPED WITHIN A JAPANESE EDITING ROOM

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:02:16 -0600

32 lines

SNAPPED WITHIN APERTURE

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Sep 2009 18:37:41 +0100

43 lines

Re: SNAPPED WITHIN APERTURE

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Sep 2009 10:58:20 -0700

57 lines

Re: SNAPPED WITHIN APERTURE

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Sep 2009 00:46:26 +0100

110 lines

Re: SNAPPED WITHIN APERTURE

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Sep 2009 08:43:53 -0600

35 lines

snapshot

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Sep 2009 14:50:18 +1000

15 lines

Re: snapshot

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Sep 2009 07:52:50 +0100

31 lines

Re: snapshot

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Sep 2009 08:55:00 -0600

42 lines

sNapTime zZzzZZzzz

Angel Marquez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Sep 2009 01:01:01 -0700

56 lines

Re: sNapTime zZzzZZzzz

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Sep 2009 01:10:44 +0300

66 lines

Re: sNapTime zZzzZZzzz

Angel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Sep 2009 15:23:44 -0700

75 lines

Some poems by Jeff Hilson at the Argotist

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Sep 2009 19:01:33 +0100

12 lines

Re: Some poems by Jeff Hilson at the Argotist

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Sep 2009 19:23:57 +0300

20 lines

Sonnet Incorporating a Poem by James Tate

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Sep 2009 16:54:42 -0500

39 lines

The Last Drop: Versions of August Stramm

Edmund Hardy <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Sep 2009 12:07:38 +0000

51 lines

Re: The Last Drop: Versions of August Stramm

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Sep 2009 09:35:09 -0500

79 lines

Re: The Last Drop: Versions of August Stramm

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Sep 2009 09:51:27 -0600

78 lines

Re: The Last Drop: Versions of August Stramm

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Sep 2009 10:59:09 -0500

105 lines

Re: The Last Drop: Versions of August Stramm

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Sep 2009 14:41:52 -0600

37 lines

Re: The Last Drop: Versions of August Stramm

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:53:24 +0100

130 lines

Re: The Last Drop: Versions of August Stramm

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Sep 2009 08:48:01 -0600

40 lines

Re: The Last Drop: Versions of August Stramm

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Sep 2009 08:51:55 -0600

64 lines

Re: The Last Drop: Versions of August Stramm

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:03:04 -0500

94 lines

Re: The Last Drop: Versions of August Stramm

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Sep 2009 11:27:03 +0100

96 lines

Re: The Last Drop: Versions of August Stramm

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Sep 2009 06:57:48 -0500

119 lines

to get away with this?

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:58:12 +1000

33 lines

Re: to get away with this?

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:13:44 +0100

50 lines

Re: to get away with this?

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:23:37 -0600

72 lines

Re: to get away with this?

Catherine Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:27:55 -0700

36 lines

Re: to get away with this?

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:35:38 -0600

43 lines

Re: to get away with this?

Chris Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:23:46 +1000

35 lines

to Perth Australia from Perth Perthshire

Sally Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Sep 2009 22:38:53 +0100

96 lines

Tom Clark poems

Jeffrey Side <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Sep 2009 17:32:28 +0100

12 lines

Two Snaps

Brian Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Sep 2009 22:49:26 -0700

32 lines

Two Snaps (hopefully without habitual formatting chaos this time)

Brian Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Sep 2009 22:51:43 -0700

13 lines

Two Snaps (third attempt! ignore previous incarnations!)

Brian Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Sep 2009 22:57:36 -0700

47 lines

Re: Two Snaps (third attempt! ignore previous incarnations!)

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Sep 2009 09:28:45 -0600

79 lines

Re: Two Snaps (third attempt! ignore previous incarnations!)

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Sep 2009 17:46:04 +0100

69 lines

Re: Two Snaps (third attempt! ignore previous incarnations!)

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Sep 2009 10:21:38 -0400

61 lines

two wildly varying reviews (was Rae Armantrout & Rachel Loden in Los Angeles)

Rachel Loden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Sep 2009 04:46:41 -0700

112 lines

Re: two wildly varying reviews (was Rae Armantrout & Rachel Loden in Los Angeles)

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Sep 2009 09:37:16 -0600

36 lines

Re: two wildly varying reviews (was Rae Armantrout & Rachel Loden in Los Angeles)

Rachel Loden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Sep 2009 09:07:20 -0700

41 lines

Re: two wildly varying reviews (was Rae Armantrout & Rachel Loden in Los Angeles)

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Sep 2009 09:42:45 -0700

123 lines

Re: two wildly varying reviews (was Rae Armantrout & Rachel Loden in Los Angeles)

Ken Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Sep 2009 16:35:24 -0400

32 lines

Re: two wildly varying reviews (was Rae Armantrout & Rachel Loden in Los Angeles)

Rachel Loden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Sep 2009 10:25:56 -0700

36 lines

Re: two wildly varying reviews (was Rae Armantrout & Rachel Loden in Los Angeles)

Ken Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Sep 2009 14:20:12 -0400

35 lines

University of Toronto Quarterly 78:3 is now available online

UTP Journals <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Sep 2009 08:38:09 -0400

112 lines

upton on cobbing

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:50:23 +1000

18 lines

Re: upton on cobbing

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:16:43 +0100

59 lines

Washington Post's Style Invitational Winners

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Sep 2009 19:48:02 -0400

103 lines

Re: Washington Post's Style Invitational Winners

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:02:37 +0800

118 lines

Re: Washington Post's Style Invitational Winners

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Sep 2009 07:06:31 +0100

124 lines

Re: Washington Post's Style Invitational Winners

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Sep 2009 08:34:13 -0600

34 lines

Weather Snap

Brian Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:38:39 -0700

21 lines

Re: Weather Snap

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 2009 09:36:57 +1000

46 lines

Re: Weather Snap

Brian Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Sep 2009 22:50:47 -0700

61 lines

Re: Weather Snap

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:39:28 +0100

41 lines

Re: Weather Snap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 2009 08:55:01 -0600

51 lines

Re: Weather Snap

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:18:06 +0100

42 lines

Re: Weather Snap

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:18:41 +0100

81 lines

Re: Weather Snap

Brian Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:23:08 -0700

70 lines

JISCMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager