JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for GP-UK Archives


GP-UK Archives

GP-UK Archives


September 2009


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

GP-UK Home

GP-UK Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

accidents at work

Jel Coward <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Sep 2009 22:04:30 -0700

30 lines

Re: accidents at work

John Glasspool <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Sep 2009 17:32:21 +0100

51 lines

Re: accidents at work

Jel Coward <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Sep 2009 07:27:16 -0700

23 lines

Amateur Transplants next weekend

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Sep 2009 19:29:33 +0100

103 lines

Re: Amateur Transplants next weekend

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Sep 2009 11:55:14 +0100

25 lines

Re: Amateur Transplants next weekend

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Sep 2009 11:52:42 +0100

29 lines

Bad Science in Birmingham

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:50:28 +0100

47 lines

Charles Bonnett syndrome

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Sep 2009 22:53:53 +0100

16 lines

Completely unlike spam, from EMIS

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Sep 2009 19:56:00 +0100

36 lines

Re: Completely unlike spam, from EMIS

Gavin Jamie <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Sep 2009 08:25:04 +0100

55 lines

Re: Completely unlike spam, from EMIS

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Sep 2009 08:39:35 +0100

26 lines

Re: Completely unlike spam, from EMIS

TIM WALTER <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Sep 2009 10:42:32 +0100

58 lines

Re: Completely unlike spam, from EMIS

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Sep 2009 10:47:50 +0100

18 lines

Re: Completely unlike spam, from EMIS

TIM WALTER <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Sep 2009 10:53:04 +0100

30 lines

Courses: Statistical Thinking schedule

Statistical Thinking <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Sep 2009 13:58:49 +0100

32 lines

Cyberounds: Teenage Resistance

Harry Levy <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:50:57 -0400

152 lines

Re: Does anyone else 'lament' the passing of the general physicia n??

TIM WALTER <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Sep 2009 11:00:57 +0100

41 lines

Re: Does anyone else 'lament' the passing of the general physicia n??

Alistair Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Sep 2009 11:49:17 +0100

33 lines

Does anyone else 'lament' the passing of the general physician??

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:55:32 +0100

55 lines

Re: Does anyone else 'lament' the passing of the general physician??

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Sep 2009 13:58:38 +0100

36 lines

Re: Does anyone else 'lament' the passing of the general physician??

John Glasspool <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Sep 2009 18:23:48 +0100

71 lines

Re: Does anyone else 'lament' the passing of the general physician??

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Sep 2009 20:50:05 +0100

54 lines

Re: Does anyone else 'lament' the passing of the general physician??

Robert Treharne Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:16:36 +0100

112 lines

Re: Does anyone else 'lament' the passing of the general physician??

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:37:51 +0100

60 lines

Re: Does anyone else 'lament' the passing of the general physician??

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:18:40 +0100

60 lines

Re: Does anyone else 'lament' the passing of the general physician??

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Sep 2009 23:44:55 +0100

45 lines

Re: Does anyone else 'lament' the passing of the general physician??

Gavin Jamie <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Sep 2009 08:21:14 +0100

27 lines

Re: Does anyone else 'lament' the passing of the general physician??

John Glasspool <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Sep 2009 08:23:58 +0100

43 lines

Re: Does anyone else 'lament' the passing of the general physician??

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Sep 2009 14:05:35 +0100

46 lines

Re: Does anyone else 'lament' the passing of the general physician??

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Sep 2009 14:16:35 +0100

76 lines

Re: Does anyone else 'lament' the passing of the general physician??

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:29:21 +0100

75 lines

Re: Does anyone else 'lament' the passing of the general physician??

Lesley Kay <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:36:56 +0100

240 lines

Re: Does anyone else 'lament' the passing of the general physician??

John Glasspool <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Sep 2009 16:30:04 +0100

94 lines

Fwd: [Fwd: one buttocked reproductive-witted security theatre - .eml .zip and viruses on NHS email]

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:24:00 +0100

66 lines

Generic drug imports

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Sep 2009 21:19:40 +0100

21 lines

Re: Generic drug imports

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Sep 2009 21:56:09 +0100

54 lines

Re: Generic drug imports

Robert Pettifer <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Sep 2009 17:09:28 EDT

40 lines

Re: Generic drug imports

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Sep 2009 22:42:49 +0100

25 lines

Re: Generic drug imports

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Sep 2009 04:15:01 +0100

46 lines

Re: Generic drug imports

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Sep 2009 08:32:50 +0100

37 lines

Re: Generic drug imports

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Sep 2009 09:14:44 +0100

41 lines

Re: Generic drug imports

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:14:04 +0100

46 lines

Re: Generic drug imports

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:24:11 +0100

28 lines

Re: Generic drug imports

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:44:49 +0100

21 lines

Re: Generic drug imports

Tim Walter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:54:17 +0100

26 lines

Re: Generic drug imports

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:02:25 +0100

22 lines

Re: H1N1 2009

Paul Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:58:04 +0100

16 lines

Re: H1N1 2009

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:41:40 +0100

23 lines

Re: H1N1 2009

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:59:45 +0100

40 lines

Re: H1N1 2009

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Sep 2009 11:14:57 +0100

46 lines

Re: H1N1 2009

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Sep 2009 11:17:15 +0100

20 lines

Re: H1N1 2009

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Sep 2009 11:56:17 +0100

76 lines

Re: H1N1 2009

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Sep 2009 12:18:11 +0100

29 lines

Re: H1N1 2009

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Sep 2009 14:12:11 +0100

55 lines

Re: H1N1 2009

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Sep 2009 17:28:20 +0100

150 lines

Re: H1N1 2009

John Glasspool <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:35:25 +0100

101 lines

Re: How do they calculate my seniority?

John Glasspool <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Sep 2009 18:27:26 +0100

173 lines

Re: How do they calculate my seniority?

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Sep 2009 20:40:39 +0100

32 lines

HTC Magic

Robert Treharne Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Sep 2009 14:48:56 +0100

14 lines

Re: HTC Magic

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Sep 2009 15:35:29 +0100

29 lines

Re: HTC Magic

Chris Salter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Sep 2009 01:07:55 +0100

40 lines

Re: HTC Magic

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Sep 2009 08:43:05 +0100

135 lines

Re: HTC Magic

Dinesh Patel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:32:48 +0100

25 lines

Re: HTC Magic

Dinesh Patel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:41:39 +0100

40 lines

Re: HTC Magic

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:20:52 +0100

19 lines

International Forum on Quality and Safety in Health Care Final Call for Abstracts

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:30:09 +0100

56 lines

iphone Apps

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Sep 2009 14:58:14 +0100

57 lines

Re: iphone Apps

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Sep 2009 15:49:05 +0100

49 lines

Re: iphone Apps

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Sep 2009 16:38:35 +0100

18 lines

Re: iphone Apps

TIM WALTER <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Sep 2009 16:51:38 +0100

29 lines

Re: iphone Apps

Mike Walton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Sep 2009 18:33:16 +0100

42 lines

Re: iphone Apps

TIM WALTER <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Sep 2009 18:35:49 +0100

47 lines

Re: iphone Apps

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Sep 2009 18:50:06 +0100

129 lines

Re: iphone Apps

Lesley Kay <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Sep 2009 11:35:37 +0100

26 lines

Re: iphone Apps

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Sep 2009 13:06:40 +0100

86 lines

Re: iphone Apps

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Sep 2009 13:16:23 +0100

44 lines

Lay members of disciplinary regulatory bodies.

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Sep 2009 19:56:43 +0100

14 lines

Re: Lay members of disciplinary regulatory bodies.

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Sep 2009 23:22:32 +0100

28 lines

Re: Lay members of disciplinary regulatory bodies.

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Sep 2009 05:06:08 +0100

36 lines

Re: Lay members of disciplinary regulatory bodies.

Paul Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Sep 2009 18:40:30 +0100

60 lines

Re: Lay members of disciplinary regulatory bodies.

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Sep 2009 20:17:05 +0100

59 lines

Re: Lay members of disciplinary regulatory bodies.

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Sep 2009 01:41:24 +0100

42 lines

Re: Lay members of disciplinary regulatory bodies.

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:55:48 +0100

27 lines

Loss of Practice Boundaries.

John Glasspool <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:41:40 +0100

23 lines

Re: Loss of Practice Boundaries.

Alistair Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:13:25 +0100

33 lines

Re: Loss of Practice Boundaries.

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:25:25 +0100

26 lines

Re: Loss of Practice Boundaries.

John Glasspool <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:49:49 +0100

50 lines

Re: Loss of Practice Boundaries.

Gavin Jamie <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:09:45 +0100

22 lines

Re: Loss of Practice Boundaries.

TIM WALTER <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:14:15 +0100

30 lines

Re: Loss of Practice Boundaries.

Russell Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:17:50 +0100

53 lines

Re: Loss of Practice Boundaries.

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:41:01 +0100

55 lines

Re: Loss of Practice Boundaries.

Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:43:48 +0100

51 lines

Re: Loss of Practice Boundaries.

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:11:07 +0100

66 lines

Re: Loss of Practice Boundaries.

Ewan Davis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:35:40 +0100

111 lines

Re: Loss of Practice Boundaries.

Chris Hunter <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:59:43 +0100

48 lines

Re: Loss of Practice Boundaries.

Paul Batchelor <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:12:05 +0100

151 lines

Re: Loss of Practice Boundaries.

TIM WALTER <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:54:58 +0100

118 lines

Re: Loss of Practice Boundaries.

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:22:46 +0100

155 lines

Re: Loss of Practice Boundaries.

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:25:26 +0100

64 lines

Re: Loss of Practice Boundaries.

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:32:12 +0100

18 lines

Re: Loss of Practice Boundaries.

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:45:46 +0100

33 lines

Mac clinical software

Russell Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Sep 2009 20:39:22 +0100

36 lines

Marfans and steroid injections?

TIM WALTER <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:06:06 +0100

16 lines

OTC addiction and jobs

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Sep 2009 22:51:59 +0100

15 lines

Re: OTC addiction and jobs

Emile de Sousa <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Sep 2009 10:28:50 +0100

25 lines

Re: OTC addiction and jobs

TIM WALTER <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Sep 2009 10:32:32 +0100

34 lines

PCT-speak

TIM WALTER <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Sep 2009 10:54:36 +0100

18 lines

Re: PCT-speak

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Sep 2009 11:03:11 +0100

19 lines

Re: PCT-speak

Robert Treharne Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Sep 2009 11:11:40 +0100

32 lines

Re: PCT-speak

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Sep 2009 11:22:06 +0100

52 lines

Re: PCT-speak

TIM WALTER <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Sep 2009 11:39:34 +0100

36 lines

Re: PCT-speak

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Sep 2009 12:28:15 +0100

29 lines

Re: PCT-speak

TIM WALTER <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Sep 2009 13:19:07 +0100

40 lines

Re: PCT-speak

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Sep 2009 14:02:14 +0100

26 lines

Re: PCT-speak

TIM WALTER <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Sep 2009 14:55:50 +0100

39 lines

Re: PCT-speak

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Sep 2009 15:20:18 +0100

17 lines

PHCSG Annual Conference - BOOK NOW!

Robert Treharne Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Sep 2009 13:01:10 +0100

317 lines

Physics - Dark energy and dark matter

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Sep 2009 16:32:51 +0100

24 lines

Re: Physics - Dark energy and dark matter

John Glasspool <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Sep 2009 18:20:17 +0100

44 lines

Re: Physics - Dark energy and dark matter

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Sep 2009 22:32:04 +0100

25 lines

Star Wars Force Trainer - could there ba a medical use?

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Sep 2009 09:43:11 +0100

17 lines

Re: Star Wars Force Trainer - could there ba a medical use?

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Sep 2009 12:10:19 +0100

31 lines

Re: Star Wars Force Trainer - could there ba a medical use?

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Sep 2009 12:47:55 +0100

21 lines

Valuation and legal fees on property sale

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Sep 2009 08:44:37 +0100

40 lines

Re: Valuation and legal fees on property sale

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Sep 2009 12:15:05 +0100

59 lines

Re: Valuation and legal fees on property sale

Alistair Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Sep 2009 13:15:18 +0100

54 lines

Re: Valuation and legal fees on property sale

James McGlew <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Sep 2009 13:36:07 +0000

165 lines

Re: Valuation and legal fees on property sale

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Sep 2009 14:54:47 +0100

36 lines

Re: Valuation and legal fees on property sale

Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Sep 2009 18:53:23 +0100

53 lines

Wedgetail: patient access medical record/EHR

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Sep 2009 11:31:04 +0100

37 lines

What is the name of the syndrome affecting the NHS?

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 11:34:56 +0100

18 lines

Re: What is the name of the syndrome affecting the NHS?

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:27:07 +0100

46 lines

Re: What is the name of the syndrome affecting the NHS?

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:10:36 +0100

22 lines

Re: What is the name of the syndrome affecting the NHS?

Paul Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:21:18 +0100

44 lines

Re: What is the name of the syndrome affecting the NHS?

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:08:17 +0100

34 lines

Re: What is the name of the syndrome affecting the NHS?

John Glasspool <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:18:50 +0100

49 lines

Who has the Learning Disability DES yet?

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Sep 2009 14:52:04 +0100

26 lines

Re: Who has the Learning Disability DES yet?

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Sep 2009 10:23:38 +0100

40 lines

Re: Who has the Learning Disability DES yet?

John Glasspool <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Sep 2009 08:03:18 +0100

58 lines

Re: Who has the Learning Disability DES yet?

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Sep 2009 16:59:12 +0100

25 lines

Re: Who has the Learning Disability DES yet?

John Glasspool <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Sep 2009 19:49:31 +0100

42 lines

you let locums plug in their USB drives?

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Sep 2009 01:10:16 +0100

14 lines

Re: you let locums plug in their USB drives?

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Sep 2009 01:30:51 +0100

22 lines

Re: you let locums plug in their USB drives?

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Sep 2009 11:10:37 +0100

71 lines

JISCMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager