JISCMail - PHD-DESIGN Archives

Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Subscriber's Corner

Email Lists

PHD-DESIGN Archives

August 2009

View:

Show Author | Hide Author

		LISTSERV Archives
		PHD-DESIGN Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Get Password

Subject	From	Date	Size
Research into university-based design support units	Terence Love	Sat, 1 Aug 2009 22:53:19 +0800	35 lines
Re: PHD-DESIGN Digest - 31 Jul 2009 to 1 Aug 2009 (#2009-176)	jha santosh	Sun, 2 Aug 2009 14:45:39 +0530	86 lines
Department of Design Research archive	Tobie Kerridge	Sun, 2 Aug 2009 15:49:00 +0100	38 lines
Re: Research into university-based design support units	David Sless	Mon, 3 Aug 2009 02:43:29 +1000	19 lines
Re: Research into university-based design support units	David Durling	Sun, 2 Aug 2009 19:01:47 +0100	55 lines
Fwd: Free online access to 52 Business, Management and Organization Journals	jeremy hunsinger	Mon, 3 Aug 2009 20:23:13 +1000	62 lines
cri courses and publications	David Sless	Mon, 3 Aug 2009 20:46:12 +1000	29 lines
Re: Research into university-based design support units	David Sless	Mon, 3 Aug 2009 21:08:21 +1000	99 lines
Doing Good Project and Social Networking	Halldor Gislason	Mon, 3 Aug 2009 14:35:38 -0000	28 lines
The Poster journal - call for papers	alanna	Tue, 4 Aug 2009 15:33:53 +0100	40 lines
2010 and beyond - graphic design for digital media	Dave Wood	Tue, 4 Aug 2009 19:03:23 +0100	22 lines
SenseMaker Dialogs Registration Opens	GK VanPatter \| NextD	Tue, 4 Aug 2009 16:56:15 -0400	44 lines
Re: 2010 and beyond - graphic design for digital media	Dave Crossland	Tue, 4 Aug 2009 23:14:55 +0100	32 lines
Re: Research into university-based design support units	Corrine Beaumont	Wed, 5 Aug 2009 11:53:07 +0100	26 lines
Axis Inc.	David Sless	Wed, 5 Aug 2009 21:44:07 +1000	26 lines
Structure for practice based PhD	Christopher Kueh	Thu, 6 Aug 2009 02:59:04 +0000	84 lines
Re: Structure for practice based PhD	Gavin Melles	Thu, 6 Aug 2009 13:02:56 +1000	97 lines
Re: Structure for practice based PhD	Ken Friedman	Thu, 6 Aug 2009 13:53:18 +1000	81 lines
Re: Structure for practice based PhD	Eduardo Corte Real	Thu, 6 Aug 2009 10:28:25 +0100	171 lines
Re: Structure for practice based PhD	Beaumont, Corrine	Thu, 6 Aug 2009 12:16:46 +0100	66 lines
Doctor of Arts Re: Structure for practice based PhD	Ken Friedman	Thu, 6 Aug 2009 22:52:01 +1000	129 lines
Re: Structure for practice based PhD	David Durling	Thu, 6 Aug 2009 15:50:24 +0100	132 lines
Re: Doctor of Arts Re: Structure for practice based PhD	Eduardo Corte Real	Thu, 6 Aug 2009 16:26:08 +0100	84 lines
Re: Structure for practice based PhD	Ken Friedman	Fri, 7 Aug 2009 05:25:52 +1000	100 lines
Re: Structure for practice based PhD-some articles	Cigdem Kaya	Thu, 6 Aug 2009 23:41:22 +0300	154 lines
Re: Structure for practice based PhD	Tiiu Poldma	Thu, 6 Aug 2009 20:18:27 -0400	134 lines
Re: Structure for practice based PhD	Lubomir Savov Popov	Thu, 6 Aug 2009 22:28:56 -0400	106 lines
Re: Structure for practice based PhD	Christopher Kueh	Fri, 7 Aug 2009 05:29:50 +0000	27 lines
Re: Structure for practice based PhD	Ranulph Glanville	Fri, 7 Aug 2009 07:48:04 +0100	107 lines
Re: Structure for practice based PhD	Ken Friedman	Fri, 7 Aug 2009 08:43:38 +0100	150 lines
What's in a title?	Ranulph Glanville	Fri, 7 Aug 2009 09:02:33 +0100	194 lines
Re: Structure for practice based PhD	David Durling	Fri, 7 Aug 2009 09:11:42 +0100	73 lines
Re: Structure for practice based PhD	Eduardo Corte Real	Fri, 7 Aug 2009 11:52:43 +0100	95 lines
Winged Victories ....	Ken Friedman	Fri, 7 Aug 2009 12:24:40 +0100	46 lines
Re: Structure for practice based PhD	Tiiu Poldma	Fri, 7 Aug 2009 08:32:14 -0400	159 lines
PostDoc position in Sweden	Aaron Houssian	Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:26:54 +0200	71 lines
Re: Structure for practice based PhD	David Durling	Mon, 10 Aug 2009 14:43:25 +0100	39 lines
Re: Structure for practice based PhD	David Durling	Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:23:31 +0100	84 lines
Re: Structure for practice based PhD	Eduardo Corte Real	Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:47:56 +0100	65 lines
Re: Structure for practice based PhD	Swanson, Gunnar	Mon, 10 Aug 2009 14:37:22 -0400	32 lines
Re: Structure for practice based PhD	David Durling	Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:39:35 +0100	57 lines
Re: History of the PhD (was: Structure for practice based PhD)	Danny Butt	Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:45:37 +1200	268 lines
FW: Structure for practice based PhD	Salisbury, Martin	Tue, 11 Aug 2009 08:19:58 +0100	469 lines
Re: Structure for practice based PhD	Wolfgang Jonas	Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:56:36 +0200	162 lines
Re: Structure for practice based PhD	Terence Love	Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:49:31 +0800	80 lines
thank you PhD list	Mike McAuley	Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:57:25 +1200	39 lines
Re: thank you PhD list	David Durling	Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:37:19 +0100	35 lines
cfp :: WORKSHOP :: Informing the design of the future urban landscape :: Creativity & Cognition Conference	Ingi Helgason	Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:37:43 +0100	128 lines
Re: Structure for practice based PhD	Ken Friedman	Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:42:27 +0100	126 lines
Re: Structure for practice based PhD	Ken Friedman	Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:47:00 +0100	37 lines
Congratulations	Ken Friedman	Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:51:27 +0100	19 lines
Structure for practice based PhD	David Durling	Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:01:18 +0100	198 lines
Re: Structure for practice based PhD	Ken Friedman	Wed, 12 Aug 2009 22:48:17 +1000	148 lines
Re: Structure for practice based PhD	jose luis casamayor	Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:44:55 +0000	152 lines
Re: Structure for practice based PhD	Lubomir Savov Popov	Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:20:44 -0400	68 lines
PhD seminar: virtual worlds and methodology	Dixi Louise Strand	Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:44:56 +0200	25 lines
Re: Structure for practice based PhD	Eduardo Corte Real	Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:33:36 +0100	138 lines
Re: Structure for practice based PhD	Terence Love	Thu, 13 Aug 2009 23:47:02 +0800	21 lines
Re: Structure for practice based PhD	Chris Rust	Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:14:34 +0100	55 lines
PhD in the field of design	michal popowsky	Thu, 13 Aug 2009 20:08:57 +0300	109 lines
Workshop Announcement: Creativity and Cognition in Engineering Design @ C&C '09	Micah Lande	Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:09:40 -0700	88 lines
Honorary Doctorates	Ken Friedman	Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:12:12 +1000	98 lines
Re: Structure for practice based PhD -- some additional thoughts	Ken Friedman	Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:35:54 +1000	74 lines
Being Academic (AHRC Practice-Led Workshop Summary 1)	Ken Friedman	Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:39:55 +1000	211 lines
Research (AHRC Practice-Led Workshop Summary 2)	Ken Friedman	Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:41:15 +1000	253 lines
The PhD Degree (AHRC Practice-Led Workshop Summary 3)	Ken Friedman	Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:42:47 +1000	217 lines
Research Skills (AHRC Practice-Led Workshop Summary 4)	Ken Friedman	Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:46:39 +1000	296 lines
Practice-Led Research (AHRC Practice-Led Workshop Summary 5)	Ken Friedman	Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:47:58 +1000	299 lines
Re: Structure for practice based PhD	Martin Salisbury	Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:15:33 +0100	129 lines
Re: thank you PhD list	Tiiu Poldma	Fri, 14 Aug 2009 07:26:13 -0400	65 lines
Re: Structure for practice based PhD	David Durling	Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:35:14 +0100	28 lines
Re: Structure for practice based PhD	Terence Love	Fri, 14 Aug 2009 20:01:36 +0800	51 lines
Innovation in the recession	Andy Murray	Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:17:09 +0100	25 lines
Re: Innovation in the recession	David Durling	Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:59:37 +0100	51 lines
Art and Design Schools becoming scientific	Terence Love	Sat, 15 Aug 2009 00:00:59 +0800	165 lines
Re: Art and Design Schools becoming scientific	Swanson, Gunnar	Fri, 14 Aug 2009 20:00:36 -0400	68 lines
FW: Graphic design science, biology and software	Terence Love	Sat, 15 Aug 2009 09:34:00 +0800	64 lines
Re: Art and Design Schools becoming scientific	Hodge Robin	Sat, 15 Aug 2009 07:42:16 +0100	243 lines
Re: Art and Design Schools becoming scientific	Gavin Melles	Sat, 15 Aug 2009 17:07:18 +1000	242 lines
Clarifying an epistemological and ontological confusion	Ken Friedman	Sat, 15 Aug 2009 08:22:19 +0100	74 lines
Re: Clarifying an epistemological and ontological confusion	Terence Love	Sat, 15 Aug 2009 16:08:34 +0800	43 lines
Re: Clarifying an epistemological and ontological confusion	Johann van der Merwe	Sat, 15 Aug 2009 10:50:55 +0200	49 lines
SV: Clarifying an epistemological and ontological confusion	Birger Sevaldson	Sat, 15 Aug 2009 11:25:41 +0200	93 lines
Re: Clarifying an epistemological and ontological confusion	Gavin Melles	Sat, 15 Aug 2009 19:26:15 +1000	16 lines
thank you all	jacqui	Sat, 15 Aug 2009 10:28:16 +0100	47 lines
Re: SV: Clarifying an epistemological and ontological confusion	Gavin Melles	Sat, 15 Aug 2009 19:37:52 +1000	16 lines
Re: Clarifying an epistemological and ontological confusion	Terence Love	Sat, 15 Aug 2009 19:48:13 +0800	85 lines
Re: Clarifying an epistemological and ontological confusion	Keith Russell	Sat, 15 Aug 2009 22:11:14 +1000	84 lines
Philosophy of Mind - Wittgenstein's Beetle	Gavin Melles	Sat, 15 Aug 2009 22:21:06 +1000	14 lines
Re: Philosophy of Mind - Wittgenstein's Beetle	Ben Matthews	Sat, 15 Aug 2009 16:56:31 +0200	50 lines
Re: Clarifying an epistemological and ontological confusion	Johann van der Merwe	Sat, 15 Aug 2009 17:39:20 +0200	78 lines
Re: Clarifying an epistemological and ontological confusion	Filippo A. Salustri	Sat, 15 Aug 2009 12:28:47 -0400	108 lines
Re: Innovation in the recession	Gibson, Michael	Sat, 15 Aug 2009 16:02:31 -0500	121 lines
Who Designs?	Ken Friedman	Sat, 15 Aug 2009 23:21:32 +0100	389 lines
Re: Innovation in the recession	Rob Curedale	Sat, 15 Aug 2009 15:28:40 -0700	153 lines
Re: Who Designs?	Johann van der Merwe	Sun, 16 Aug 2009 08:28:13 +0200	81 lines
Re: Who Designs?	Ken Friedman	Sun, 16 Aug 2009 10:31:19 +0100	70 lines
Re: Who Designs?	[log in to unmask]	Sun, 16 Aug 2009 12:49:13 +0000	106 lines
Re: Who Designs?	jeremy hunsinger	Sun, 16 Aug 2009 10:51:06 -0400	177 lines
Upcycling	Stanislav Roudavski	Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:10:11 +1000	24 lines
Re: Upcycling	Luke Feast	Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:31:23 +1200	37 lines
Re: Upcycling	Stanislav Roudavski	Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:55:54 +1000	18 lines
Re: Who Designs?	Ken Friedman	Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:06:16 +1000	178 lines
Re: Upcycling	Terence Love	Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:59:00 +0800	41 lines
Re: Who Designs?	Keith Russell	Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:00:30 +1000	31 lines
Re: Who Designs?	Terence Love	Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:12:01 +0800	60 lines
Re: Clarifying an epistemological and ontological confusion	Ben Matthews	Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:12:36 +0200	35 lines
Re: Clarifying an epistemological and ontological confusion	Gavin Melles	Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:41:19 +1000	104 lines
Re: Who Designs?	Ben Matthews	Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:40:07 +0200	123 lines
Re: Upcycling	Cigdem Kaya	Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:57:50 +0300	55 lines
Re: Who Designs?	jeremy hunsinger	Mon, 17 Aug 2009 07:41:05 -0400	93 lines
Re: Who Designs?	jeremy hunsinger	Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:20:03 -0400	253 lines
Re: Who Designs?	David Sless	Mon, 17 Aug 2009 23:14:45 +1000	64 lines
Re: Who Designs?	Ken Friedman	Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:30:05 +0100	116 lines
scientific jetsam and design thinking	Swanson, Gunnar	Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:00:25 -0400	116 lines
Re: Who Designs?	Ben Matthews	Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:53:33 +0200	138 lines
Re: Who Designs?	jeremy hunsinger	Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:41:51 -0400	308 lines
Re: Clarifying an epistemological and ontological confusion	Charles Burnette	Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:42:23 -0400	23 lines
Re: Clarifying an epistemological and ontological confusion	Terence Love	Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:27:55 +0800	47 lines
Re: Who Designs?	Charles Burnette	Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:27:17 -0400	38 lines
Re: scientific jetsam and design thinking	Christopher Kueh	Tue, 18 Aug 2009 02:57:42 +0000	186 lines
virtual exhibitions	Alun Price	Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:51:30 +0800	16 lines
Re: Who Designs?	Jerry Diethelm	Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:33:13 -0700	86 lines
Re: scientific jetsam and design thinking	Katherine Hepworth	Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:39:01 +1000	210 lines
Re: scientific jetsam and design thinking	Terence Love	Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:58:16 +0800	50 lines
Re: scientific jetsam and design thinking	Christopher Kueh	Tue, 18 Aug 2009 07:04:03 +0000	96 lines
Re: Who Designs?	Ben Matthews	Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:35:11 +0200	171 lines
Re: virtual exhibitions	Maja Kaurin	Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:09:17 +0200	46 lines
Call for papers MEI 31: Objects and communication	Belkhamsa Sarah	Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:15:39 +0100	77 lines
Re: virtual exhibitions	Tun-Hsueh, Chan	Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:30:09 +0100	28 lines
Re: scientific jetsam and design thinking	Karel van der Waarde	Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:39:54 +0200	134 lines
Re: virtual exhibitions	Charlotte Magnusson	Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:40:46 +0200	30 lines
Re: Who Designs?	jeremy hunsinger	Tue, 18 Aug 2009 08:53:01 -0400	343 lines
virtual exhibitions	Michael Schmidt (mschmidt)	Tue, 18 Aug 2009 08:46:38 -0500	49 lines
Re: Clarifying an epistemological and ontological confusion	Paul Mike Zender	Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:37:22 +0100	65 lines
Re: virtual exhibitions	Terence Love	Tue, 18 Aug 2009 22:51:16 +0800	35 lines
Re: Who Designs?	Charles Burnette	Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:52:35 -0400	74 lines
Re: Who Designs?	jeremy hunsinger	Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:10:12 -0400	103 lines
Re: Who Designs?	Paul Mike Zender	Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:22:26 +0100	103 lines
Re: Who Designs?	jeremy hunsinger	Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:25:06 -0400	40 lines
Re: Clarifying an epistemological and ontological confusion	Justin Wilwerding	Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:28:27 -0500	113 lines
Connecting research to practice/was Who Designs?	Jacques Giard	Tue, 18 Aug 2009 08:39:48 -0700	122 lines
Re: scientific jetsam and design thinking	Swanson, Gunnar	Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:02:36 -0400	69 lines
Re: scientific jetsam and design thinking	Swanson, Gunnar	Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:10:08 -0400	68 lines
just an idea	jeremy hunsinger	Tue, 18 Aug 2009 20:52:34 -0400	35 lines
Re: just an idea	Keith Russell	Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:00:35 +1000	47 lines
Re: Connecting research to practice/was Who Designs?	Terence Love	Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:03:57 +0800	105 lines
Re: Connecting research to practice/was Who Designs?	Swanson, Gunnar	Tue, 18 Aug 2009 21:12:19 -0400	117 lines
Re: Connecting research to practice/was Who Designs?	Gavin Melles	Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:15:28 +1000	112 lines
Re: virtual exhibitions	Alun Price	Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:25:05 +0800	16 lines
Re: Connecting research to practice/was Who Designs?	Terence Love	Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:37:49 +0800	27 lines
Re: virtual exhibitions	Uma Chandru	Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:17:12 +0530	32 lines
conceptual benefits of surfaces	Keith Russell	Wed, 19 Aug 2009 16:12:01 +1000	30 lines
Re: Connecting research to practice/was Who Designs?	Johann van der Merwe	Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:17:01 +0200	88 lines
Re: Connecting research to practice/was Who Designs?	Karel van der Waarde	Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:21:35 +0200	111 lines
Re: Connecting research to practice/was Who Designs?	David Sless	Wed, 19 Aug 2009 12:29:49 +0400	59 lines
Re: Connecting research to practice/was Who Designs?	Ranulph Glanville	Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:49:07 +0100	43 lines
Re: Connecting research to practice/was Who Designs?	Terence Love	Wed, 19 Aug 2009 18:34:28 +0800	106 lines
Re: Who Designs?	Charles Burnette	Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:06:07 -0400	43 lines
Re: Who Designs?	jeremy hunsinger	Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:23:20 -0400	85 lines
Re: Connecting research to practice/was Who Designs?	Swanson, Gunnar	Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:05:28 -0400	87 lines
Re: Connecting research to practice/was Who Designs?	Terence Love	Wed, 19 Aug 2009 23:23:35 +0800	141 lines
Re: Who Designs?	Charles Burnette	Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:40:59 -0400	47 lines
Re: Who Designs?	jeremy hunsinger	Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:44:59 -0400	53 lines
Re: Connecting research to practice/was Who Designs?	Jacques Giard	Wed, 19 Aug 2009 12:52:01 -0700	154 lines
Please trim prior posts to the appropriate content	Ken Friedman	Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:20:41 +0100	59 lines
Re: Clarifying an epistemological and ontological confusion	Paul Mike Zender	Thu, 20 Aug 2009 02:48:05 +0100	17 lines
Re: Connecting research to practice/was Who Designs?	David Sless	Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:14:32 +1000	82 lines
Craft Research journal - Call for Papers	alanna	Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:42:25 +0100	38 lines
terry love post	Victor Margolin	Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:01:07 -0700	28 lines
Re: terry love post	Terence Love	Fri, 21 Aug 2009 06:14:22 +0800	48 lines
Re: Connecting research to practice/was Who Designs?	Jacques Giard	Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:34:12 -0700	144 lines
Re: Connecting research to practice/was Who Designs?	Viveka Turnbull Hocking	Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:54:57 +1000	41 lines
Re: terry love post	Karel van der Waarde	Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:54:31 +0200	121 lines
Re: Connecting research to practice/was Who Designs?	François Nsenga	Fri, 21 Aug 2009 05:18:58 -0400	58 lines
DRS conference Montreal 2010	David Durling	Fri, 21 Aug 2009 12:32:05 +0100	118 lines
Intentional systems/who designs?/terry love post	Gustavo Casillas	Sat, 22 Aug 2009 13:08:24 -0500	76 lines
Re: Clarifying an epistemological and ontological confusion	Terence Love	Sun, 23 Aug 2009 19:02:14 +0800	172 lines
Re: Intentional systems/who designs?/terry love post	Mattias Arvola	Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:57:49 +0100	103 lines
RE Jacques Giard's comment	A.B.Thorpe	Mon, 24 Aug 2009 11:28:16 +0100	77 lines
Re: RE Jacques Giard's comment	Gavin Melles	Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:00:05 +1000	100 lines
Re: scientific jetsam and design thinking	Robert Harland	Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:16:03 +0100	118 lines
Re: Positions at Rensselaer - Games & Simulation Arts & Science Program	Judith Gregory	Mon, 24 Aug 2009 07:05:19 -0500	120 lines
Re: scientific jetsam and design thinking	Swanson, Gunnar	Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:09:32 -0400	65 lines
Re: scientific jetsam and design thinking	Robert Harland	Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:47:33 +0100	71 lines
Re: scientific jetsam and design thinking	teena clerke	Tue, 25 Aug 2009 09:52:31 +1000	31 lines
Re: RE Jacques Giard's comment	teena clerke	Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:32:20 +1000	39 lines
Re: scientific jetsam and design thinking	Swanson, Gunnar	Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:36:25 -0400	66 lines
Re: scientific jetsam and design thinking	Robert Harland	Tue, 25 Aug 2009 08:37:43 +0100	70 lines
SV: scientific jetsam and design thinking	Birger Sevaldson	Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:02:34 +0200	85 lines
Re: don't break up the list	Dave Wood	Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:39:34 +0100	54 lines
Re: don't break up the list	McMillan John	Tue, 25 Aug 2009 18:43:44 +0100	97 lines
don't break up the list	Victor Margolin	Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:19:09 -0700	31 lines
Re: don't break up the list	Ken Friedman	Wed, 26 Aug 2009 07:54:41 +1000	88 lines
Re: RE Jacques Giard's comment	Jacques Giard	Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:17:42 -0700	49 lines
breaking up was a poor choice of words!	A.B.Thorpe	Wed, 26 Aug 2009 00:38:59 +0100	44 lines
Re: breaking up was a poor choice of words!	Viveka Turnbull Hocking	Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:24:18 +1000	41 lines
Re: breaking up was a poor choice of words!	Uma Chandru	Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:22:15 +0530	65 lines
Re: RE Jacques Giard's comment	Martin Salisbury	Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:21:02 +0100	104 lines
Re: RE Jacques Giard's comment	Swanson, Gunnar	Wed, 26 Aug 2009 13:49:17 -0400	27 lines
Re: Intentional systems/who designs?/terry love post	Gustavo Víctor Casillas Lavín	Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:35:12 -0500	58 lines
Re: RE Jacques Giard's comment	teena clerke	Thu, 27 Aug 2009 07:05:13 +1000	19 lines
Writing Design - the Design History Society Annual Conference	Lees-Maffei, Grace	Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:19:30 +0100	41 lines
Product Communication and the Nationalisation of Consumption, Vienna, 1-3 October 2009	Artemis Yagou	Fri, 28 Aug 2009 19:54:30 +0300	206 lines
Postdoctoral scholarship in creative design for innovation in science and technology	Bo T. Christensen	Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:01:32 +0200	77 lines

PHD-DESIGN Archives

August 2009

Options

Subject

From

Date

Size

JiscMail Tools

RSS Feeds and Sharing

Search Archives

Archives