JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PRACTITIONER-RESEARCHER Archives


PRACTITIONER-RESEARCHER Archives

PRACTITIONER-RESEARCHER Archives


June 2009


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

A note from the 2008-9 e-seminar convenor (6 messages)
Demise of the University (1 message)
Explaining our educational influences in learn... (19 messages)
Fw: Demise of the University (2 messages)
Fw: Strange but true? (1 message)
Incisive cf Critical Epistomological Enquiry (6 messages)
Launch of our e-seminar season (1 message)
Life affirming energy with values/A new epistemology for educational knowledge (11 messages)
Occlusional and Inclusional logic (7 messages)
Response to Sarah Fletcher (1 message)
The 'point' of inclusionality (10 messages)
Using visual data to promote practitioner reflection on practice (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PRACTITIONER-RESEARCHER Home

PRACTITIONER-RESEARCHER Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

A note from the 2008-9 e-seminar convenor

Re: A note from the 2008-9 e-seminar convenor

Jack Whitehead <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Jun 2009 10:04:01 +0100

15 lines

Re: A note from the 2008-9 e-seminar convenor

Mike RICHARDSON <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Jun 2009 14:47:20 +0100

100 lines

Re: A note from the 2008-9 e-seminar convenor

Jack Whitehead <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Jun 2009 08:39:47 +0100

63 lines

Re: A note from the 2008-9 e-seminar convenor

Jackie BARBERA <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Jun 2009 08:50:07 +0100

80 lines

Re: A note from the 2008-9 e-seminar convenor

Jack Whitehead <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:32:37 +0100

163 lines

Re: A note from the 2008-9 e-seminar convenor

Jackie BARBERA <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:36:52 +0100

58 lines

New Thread

Demise of the University

Re: Demise of the University

geisha rebolledo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:48:57 -0400

1118 lines

New Thread

Explaining our educational influences in learn...

Re: Explaining our educational influences in learn...

Jack Whitehead <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Jun 2009 10:37:19 +0100

5449 lines

Re: Explaining our educational influences in learn...

Jack Whitehead <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jun 2009 08:25:45 +0100

260 lines

Re: Explaining our educational influences in learn...

Sarah Fletcher <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Jun 2009 19:47:44 +0100

65 lines

Re: Explaining our educational influences in learn...

Barry Hymer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Jun 2009 06:43:08 EDT

63 lines

Re: Explaining our educational influences in learn...

Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:00:55 +0200

111 lines

Re: Explaining our educational influences in learn...

Sarah Fletcher <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:47:13 +0100

23 lines

Re: Explaining our educational influences in learn...

Jack Whitehead <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:50:55 +0100

114 lines

Re: Explaining our educational influences in learn...

Sarah Fletcher <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:50:09 +0100

19 lines

Re: Explaining our educational influences in learn...

Jack Whitehead <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:09:19 +0100

102 lines

Re: Explaining our educational influences in learn...

geisha rebolledo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:04:02 -0400

78 lines

Re: Explaining our educational influences in learn...

Jack Whitehead <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:35:12 +0100

162 lines

Re: Explaining our educational influences in learn...

Marie Huxtable <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jun 2009 22:53:01 +0000

97 lines

Re: Explaining our educational influences in learn...

Jack Whitehead <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Jun 2009 11:44:06 +0100

214 lines

Re: Explaining our educational influences in learn...

David Loe <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Jun 2009 20:36:32 -0400

248 lines

Re: Explaining our educational influences in learn...

Jackie BARBERA <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:15:38 +0100

169 lines

Re: Explaining our educational influences in learn...

Jack Whitehead <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:32:18 +0100

3566 lines

Re: Explaining our educational influences in learn...

Karen Alexandra Mary Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Jun 2009 07:54:15 -0400

5456 lines

Re: Explaining our educational influences in learn...

Jack Whitehead <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Jun 2009 09:54:31 +0100

260 lines

Re: Explaining our educational influences in learn...

Barry Hymer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:47:58 EDT

109 lines

New Thread

Fw: Demise of the University

Fw: Demise of the University

Alan Rayner (BU) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Jun 2009 07:57:42 +0100

83 lines

Fw: Demise of the University

Alan Rayner (BU) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:01:58 +0100

1395 lines

New Thread

Fw: Strange but true?

Fw: Strange but true?

Alan Rayner (BU) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Jun 2009 08:51:36 +0100

8205 lines

New Thread

Incisive cf Critical Epistomological Enquiry

Incisive cf Critical Epistomological Enquiry

Alan Rayner (BU) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jun 2009 09:54:33 +0100

335 lines

Re: Incisive cf Critical Epistomological Enquiry

geisha rebolledo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jun 2009 09:16:16 -0400

326 lines

Re: Incisive cf Critical Epistomological Enquiry

Alan Rayner (BU) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:52:43 +0100

415 lines

Re: Incisive cf Critical Epistomological Enquiry

Alan Rayner (BU) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:02:19 +0100

2666 lines

Re: Incisive cf Critical Epistomological Enquiry

Karen Alexandra Mary Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:51:35 -0400

87 lines

Re: Incisive cf Critical Epistomological Enquiry

Alan Rayner (BU) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Jun 2009 09:04:36 +0100

1021 lines

New Thread

Launch of our e-seminar season

Launch of our e-seminar season

Sarah Fletcher <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Jun 2009 08:20:23 +0100

25 lines

New Thread

Life affirming energy with values/A new epistemology for educational knowledge

Re: Life affirming energy with values/A new epistemology for educational knowledge

Brian wakeman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Jun 2009 10:14:38 +0000

375 lines

Re: Life affirming energy with values/A new epistemology for educational knowledge

Alan Rayner (BU) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:15:09 +0100

776 lines

Re: Life affirming energy with values/A new epistemology for educational knowledge

Alan Rayner (BU) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Jun 2009 17:09:05 +0100

2193 lines

Re: Life affirming energy with values/A new epistemology for educational knowledge

geisha rebolledo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Jun 2009 15:46:08 -0400

262 lines

Re: Life affirming energy with values/A new epistemology for educational knowledge

Alan Rayner (BU) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Jun 2009 08:26:29 +0100

451 lines

Re: Life affirming energy with values/A new epistemology for educational knowledge

Jack Whitehead <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:35:22 +0100

234 lines

Re: Life affirming energy with values/A new epistemology for educational knowledge

Alan Rayner (BU) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Jun 2009 11:45:35 +0100

913 lines

Re: Life affirming energy with values/A new epistemology for educational knowledge

Jack Whitehead <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Jun 2009 12:11:09 +0100

107 lines

Re: Life affirming energy with values/A new epistemology for educational knowledge

Cathie Pearce <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Jun 2009 12:45:47 +0100

226 lines

Re: Life affirming energy with values/A new epistemology for educational knowledge

Karen Alexandra Mary Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Jun 2009 11:39:10 -0400

82 lines

Re: Life affirming energy with values/A new epistemology for educational knowledge

Alan Rayner (BU) <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Jun 2009 17:45:27 +0100

1888 lines

New Thread

Occlusional and Inclusional logic

Occlusional and Inclusional logic

Alan Rayner (BU) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:23:00 +0100

176 lines

Re: Occlusional and Inclusional logic

Alan Rayner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:21:20 +0100

73 lines

Re: Occlusional and Inclusional logic

Karen Alexandra Mary Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jun 2009 18:55:27 -0400

45 lines

Re: Occlusional and Inclusional logic

Christine O'Hanlon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:45:33 +0100

245 lines

Re: Occlusional and Inclusional logic

Brian wakeman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:54:03 +0000

208 lines

Re: Occlusional and Inclusional logic

Jack Whitehead <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:21:55 +0100

261 lines

Re: Occlusional and Inclusional logic

David Loe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:40:33 -0400

308 lines

New Thread

Response to Sarah Fletcher

Response to Sarah Fletcher

Marie Huxtable <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:43:54 +0100

105 lines

New Thread

The 'point' of inclusionality

The 'point' of inclusionality

Alan Rayner (BU) <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Jun 2009 10:44:02 +0100

237 lines

Re: The 'point' of inclusionality

Jack Whitehead <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Jun 2009 14:22:32 +0100

365 lines

Re: The 'point' of inclusionality

Alan Rayner (BU) <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Jun 2009 17:05:10 +0100

632 lines

Re: The 'point' of inclusionality

Alan Rayner (BU) <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Jun 2009 20:55:27 +0100

530 lines

Re: The 'point' of inclusionality

joanwalton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Jun 2009 21:20:04 +0100

1235 lines

Re: The 'point' of inclusionality

geisha rebolledo <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Jun 2009 22:04:20 -0400

807 lines

Re: The 'point' of inclusionality

Alan Rayner (BU) <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Jun 2009 09:50:06 +0100

1234 lines

Re: The 'point' of inclusionality

Alan Rayner (BU) <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Jun 2009 15:59:34 +0100

1310 lines

Re: The 'point' of inclusionality

geisha rebolledo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Jun 2009 07:06:09 -0400

1048 lines

Re: The 'point' of inclusionality

Alan Rayner (BU) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Jun 2009 12:48:44 +0100

1458 lines

New Thread

Using visual data to promote practitioner reflection on practice

Using visual data to promote practitioner reflection on practice

Sarah Fletcher <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:59:16 +0100

34 lines

JISCMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
October 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
November 2004
September 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager