JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for POETRYETC Archives


POETRYETC Archives

POETRYETC Archives


May 2009


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

& #2 (1 message)
4 poems (1 message)
4 poems - formatted (1 message)
a little snippet - Bass (1 message)
A Northern Ireland poet (1 message)
a question for us all? (15 messages)
ad lib: snap (1 message)
Advanced theory (3 messages)
Another flood snap (7 messages)
Another question (UK) (13 messages)
antechinus (3 messages)
Arvind Mehrotra loses Oxford's Professor of Poetry election (2 messages)
Assembling in the eternal network (1 message)
Australian theatre (5 messages)
bbc radio 3 chat about Larkin (2 messages)
Beats in kansas (4 messages)
BlazeVOX 2k9 Late Spring 2009 now available (1 message)
blog pics (4 messages)
Blonk Organ (8 messages)
Blonk Organ [vegetable-peel wrappings] (1 message)
Blonk Organ [vegetable-peel wrappings] - and - (4 messages)
Breakthrough in Berlin (1 message)
Brel: poetry brought powerfully to life (9 messages)
Burke's Books (4 messages)
Capital, Holmes (1 message)
Conductors of Chaos (12 messages)
Controversy in Dublin, Ireland (1 message)
ELVIS magical ELVIS (1 message)
Faber & Faber turn Eighty (2 messages)
Fogged Clarity (3 messages)
from the Trading Post (Melbourne) (6 messages)
FW: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking) (1 message)
Good article about our current greatest. (3 messages)
goodbye temporarily (7 messages)
Google's assault on writers' copyright (1 message)
HiSpirits blog (1 message)
holiday snap (7 messages)
I just won a prize (13 messages)
interesting article (1 message)
Jeff Harrison reviews two books (1 message)
job vacancy (2 messages)
Judy Prince's POEMS (review) (3 messages)
Ken/"Childe Kenneth to the Dark Tower Came Back" (6 messages)
Lawrence Upton's Choreography (2 messages)
Mackerelling (1 message)
Mark's drool question reaps the whirlwind (2 messages)
more on Oxford (8 messages)
more on poets (6 messages)
My story project is now a play! (8 messages)
new World War I photos (4 messages)
Notice: COMING UP AT PERTH POETRY CLUB (1 message)
Notice: Mudlark (1 message)
Numinous: Spiritual Poetry, Issue 3 now online (1 message)
Obama, The Exhibit - Some documentation (1 message)
offline (4 messages)
online treasures (2 messages)
oops! (27 messages)
pat snap -(*^*)- Wednesday, 20 May 2009 (1 message)
pat snap ^*^*^^*^Wednesday, 13 May 2009 (4 messages)
pat snaps "-_+:+_-" Wednesday, 06 May 2009 (2 messages)
pat snaps "-_+:+_-" Wednesday, 06 May 2009 correcction! (1 message)
pat snap^*^*^Wednesday, 27 May 2009 (2 messages)
pat snap^*^*^Wednesday, 27 May 2009 revised (2 messages)
Perth Poetry Club: STEVE SMART 23 May; Simon Cox, Marcella Polain & more later. Spread the word. (1 message)
Poem - Slow Study (13 messages)
poem, notsnap (4 messages)
Poem: Dream song 4 by John Berryman (5 messages)
poem? (3 messages)
poetry professor (17 messages)
PS Re: Yet another question (3 messages)
PS.Re: Mark's drool question reaps the whirlwind (1 message)
question (UK) (35 messages)
Recent Nomadics Posts (1 message)
remind, mind again (2 messages)
Review copies of In Paran by Larissa Shmailo available (1 message)
Robert Frank via Leo Rubenfein (1 message)
Robin Blaser (1925-1009) (fwd) (2 messages)
Ruth Padel again (10 messages)
Salt Books Crisis (3 messages)
snap (5 messages)
snap 'not understood' (2 messages)
snap - there is a word for it (2 messages)
Snap That Apparition (7 messages)
Snap- Chinese (3 messages)
Snap/Ken--"C.D. Wright Printed in The New Yorker" (4 messages)
snap: BASS (late again) (3 messages)
snap: long 20th (3 messages)
snappish late May (3 messages)
Spread the word: Perth Poetry Club 16 May: Aidan Coleman (SA) and Kate Wilson (Bunbury) (1 message)
Still-roughage repost "In the Early Fall of 1978..." (2 messages)
Strange days indeed (1 message)
Swamping Rains (6 messages)
Talking to the Animals (5 messages)
The Ghost Dance (1 message)
The Haiku Foundation (1 message)
The poems of Patricia Brody (1 message)
Theoretically (2 messages)
Theoretically ... (5 messages)
Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking) (58 messages)
Theoretically perhaps (1 message)
These Hands Are Not Ours (Earl of Seacliff Art Workshop, 2009) available (1 message)
Thoughtmesh Snap (24 messages)
Two great short reviews of Housecat Kung Fu by Geoffrey Gatza (1 message)
UTQ 78:1- Annual Letters in Canada issue now available online (1 message)
Very Rough: "In the Fall of 1978..." (1 message)
Walcott & His Discontents (5 messages)
Yet another question (4 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

POETRYETC Home

POETRYETC Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

& #2

& #2

sharon brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 2009 09:24:20 -0600

24 lines

New Thread

4 poems

4 poems

Frederick Pollack <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 12:08:33 -0400

327 lines

New Thread

4 poems - formatted

4 poems - formatted

Frederick Pollack <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 12:09:31 -0400

173 lines

New Thread

a little snippet - Bass

Re: a little snippet - Bass

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 May 2009 14:42:09 +0100

55 lines

New Thread

A Northern Ireland poet

A Northern Ireland poet

Séamas Cain <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 2009 12:12:16 -0500

64 lines

New Thread

a question for us all?

a question for us all?

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 May 2009 08:49:27 -0600

29 lines

Re: a question for us all?

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 May 2009 11:32:34 -0400

29 lines

Re: a question for us all?

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 May 2009 12:01:01 -0400

73 lines

Re: a question for us all?

Jon Corelis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 May 2009 10:51:46 -0500

21 lines

Re: a question for us all?

Dominic Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 May 2009 17:59:40 +0100

22 lines

Re: a question for us all?

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 May 2009 13:24:18 -0400

35 lines

Re: a question for us all?

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 May 2009 22:19:35 +0100

100 lines

Re: a question for us all?

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 May 2009 23:45:26 +0100

53 lines

Re: a question for us all?

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 May 2009 05:16:06 +0100

42 lines

Re: a question for us all?

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 May 2009 05:24:01 +0100

28 lines

Re: a question for us all?

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 May 2009 00:30:12 -0400

36 lines

Re: a question for us all?

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 May 2009 09:09:47 +0100

55 lines

Re: a question for us all?

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 May 2009 13:34:11 +0100

59 lines

Re: a question for us all?

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 May 2009 09:42:51 -0600

62 lines

Re: a question for us all?

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 May 2009 09:51:09 -0600

79 lines

New Thread

ad lib: snap

ad lib: snap

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 2009 15:24:29 +0800

24 lines

New Thread

Advanced theory

Advanced theory

Jon Corelis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 21:10:35 -0500

18 lines

Re: Advanced theory

Bradley Omanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 22:24:29 -0400

26 lines

Re: Advanced theory

Dominic Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 09:42:18 +0100

16 lines

New Thread

Another flood snap

Another flood snap

Brian Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 23:13:20 -0700

22 lines

Re: Another flood snap

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 May 2009 08:31:31 +0100

63 lines

Re: Another flood snap

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 May 2009 08:42:22 +0100

60 lines

Re: Another flood snap

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 May 2009 08:45:30 +0100

78 lines

Re: Another flood snap

Brian Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 May 2009 00:55:39 -0700

48 lines

Re: Another flood snap

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 May 2009 12:35:33 +0100

100 lines

Re: Another flood snap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 May 2009 08:34:21 -0600

48 lines

New Thread

Another question (UK)

Another question (UK)

Jon Corelis <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 May 2009 09:20:36 -0500

22 lines

Re: Another question (UK)

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 May 2009 15:43:16 +0100

28 lines

Re: Another question (UK)

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 May 2009 15:46:07 +0100

35 lines

Re: Another question (UK)

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 May 2009 11:00:42 -0400

41 lines

Re: Another question (UK)

Martin Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 May 2009 19:12:03 +0200

45 lines

Re: Another question (UK)

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 May 2009 18:18:46 +0100

58 lines

Re: Another question (UK)

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 May 2009 15:07:01 -0400

65 lines

Re: Another question (UK)

Jon Corelis <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 May 2009 13:57:06 -0500

21 lines

Re: Another question (UK)

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 May 2009 19:44:12 -0400

23 lines

Re: Another question (UK)

Martin Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 May 2009 10:43:36 +0200

40 lines

Re: Another question (UK)

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 May 2009 13:26:41 +0100

86 lines

Re: Another question (UK)

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 May 2009 15:19:06 -0400

105 lines

Re: Another question (UK)

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 May 2009 15:29:04 -0400

110 lines

New Thread

antechinus

antechinus

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 11:07:34 +1000

114 lines

Re: antechinus

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 09:55:17 +0800

18 lines

Re: antechinus

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 08:16:35 -0600

44 lines

New Thread

Arvind Mehrotra loses Oxford's Professor of Poetry election

Arvind Mehrotra loses Oxford's Professor of Poetry election

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 May 2009 18:45:44 +0100

28 lines

Re: Arvind Mehrotra loses Oxford's Professor of Poetry election

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 May 2009 19:22:39 +0100

42 lines

New Thread

Assembling in the eternal network

Assembling in the eternal network

Séamas Cain <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 14:58:22 -0500

80 lines

New Thread

Australian theatre

Australian theatre

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 May 2009 12:36:59 +1000

20 lines

Re: Australian theatre

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 May 2009 13:36:36 +0800

39 lines

Re: Australian theatre

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 May 2009 09:13:23 -0600

50 lines

Re: Australian theatre

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 May 2009 08:13:08 +1000

68 lines

Re: Australian theatre

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 May 2009 11:41:25 -0600

55 lines

New Thread

bbc radio 3 chat about Larkin

bbc radio 3 chat about Larkin

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 May 2009 06:51:35 +1000

23 lines

Re: bbc radio 3 chat about Larkin

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 May 2009 22:09:08 +0100

47 lines

New Thread

Beats in kansas

Beats in kansas

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 May 2009 19:04:29 +0100

21 lines

Re: Beats in kansas

Martin Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 May 2009 21:49:17 +0200

40 lines

Re: Beats in kansas

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 May 2009 07:01:12 +0100

62 lines

Re: Beats in kansas

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 May 2009 13:52:58 -0700

79 lines

New Thread

BlazeVOX 2k9 Late Spring 2009 now available

BlazeVOX 2k9 Late Spring 2009 now available

Geoffrey Gatza <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 May 2009 02:17:50 -0400

193 lines

New Thread

blog pics

blog pics

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 May 2009 08:48:54 +0800

14 lines

Re: blog pics

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 21:04:08 -0400

22 lines

Re: blog pics

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 May 2009 08:41:18 +0100

30 lines

Re: blog pics

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 May 2009 09:16:08 -0600

51 lines

New Thread

Blonk Organ

Blonk Organ

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 May 2009 14:14:13 +0100

20 lines

Re: Blonk Organ

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 May 2009 19:32:58 +0100

30 lines

Re: Blonk Organ

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 2009 06:47:07 +0100

49 lines

Re: Blonk Organ

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 2009 07:05:17 +0100

68 lines

Re: Blonk Organ

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 2009 07:14:31 +0100

90 lines

Re: Blonk Organ

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 2009 09:22:48 +0100

105 lines

Re: Blonk Organ

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 2009 12:57:12 +0100

132 lines

Re: Blonk Organ

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 2009 20:46:31 +0100

147 lines

New Thread

Blonk Organ [vegetable-peel wrappings]

Re: Blonk Organ [vegetable-peel wrappings]

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 May 2009 07:29:38 +1000

91 lines

New Thread

Blonk Organ [vegetable-peel wrappings] - and -

Blonk Organ [vegetable-peel wrappings] - and -

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 May 2009 07:34:45 +1000

86 lines

Re: Blonk Organ [vegetable-peel wrappings] - and -

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 May 2009 09:22:52 +0100

114 lines

Re: Blonk Organ [vegetable-peel wrappings] - and -

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 2009 07:08:10 +0100

96 lines

Re: Blonk Organ [vegetable-peel wrappings] - and -

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 2009 08:13:18 -0600

124 lines

New Thread

Breakthrough in Berlin

Breakthrough in Berlin

Séamas Cain <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 09:38:09 -0500

107 lines

New Thread

Brel: poetry brought powerfully to life

Brel: poetry brought powerfully to life

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 12:31:39 +0300

30 lines

Re: Brel: poetry brought powerfully to life

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 12:12:29 +0100

46 lines

Re: Brel: poetry brought powerfully to life

Kenneth Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 07:44:20 -0400

36 lines

Re: Brel: poetry brought powerfully to life

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 07:47:41 -0400

30 lines

Re: Brel: poetry brought powerfully to life

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 May 2009 01:16:58 +0300

47 lines

Re: Brel: poetry brought powerfully to life

Kenneth Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 May 2009 19:09:50 -0400

31 lines

Re: Brel: poetry brought powerfully to life

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 May 2009 17:33:11 +0300

57 lines

Re: Brel: poetry brought powerfully to life

Jon Corelis <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 May 2009 11:06:48 -0500

19 lines

Re: Brel: poetry brought powerfully to life

Kenneth Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 May 2009 13:15:13 -0400

124 lines

New Thread

Burke's Books

Burke's Books

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 May 2009 09:03:14 +0800

15 lines

Re: Burke's Books

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 2009 15:30:54 +0100

32 lines

Re: Burke's Books

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 May 2009 08:34:39 +1000

28 lines

Re: Burke's Books

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 May 2009 14:05:07 +0100

85 lines

New Thread

Capital, Holmes

Capital, Holmes

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 May 2009 20:00:22 +0100

21 lines

New Thread

Conductors of Chaos

Conductors of Chaos

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 May 2009 10:59:37 +0100

25 lines

Re: Conductors of Chaos

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 May 2009 11:04:51 +0100

56 lines

Re: Conductors of Chaos

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 May 2009 09:19:22 -0600

97 lines

Re: Conductors of Chaos

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 May 2009 16:35:22 +0100

109 lines

Re: Conductors of Chaos

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 May 2009 16:55:07 +0100

50 lines

Re: Conductors of Chaos

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 May 2009 09:57:20 -0600

149 lines

Re: Conductors of Chaos

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 May 2009 17:01:32 +0100

68 lines

Re: Conductors of Chaos

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 May 2009 17:18:36 +0100

69 lines

Re: Conductors of Chaos

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 May 2009 17:58:41 +0100

164 lines

Re: Conductors of Chaos

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 May 2009 12:17:29 -0600

40 lines

Re: Conductors of Chaos

Martin Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 May 2009 21:31:40 +0200

61 lines

Re: Conductors of Chaos

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 May 2009 21:59:20 +0100

95 lines

New Thread

Controversy in Dublin, Ireland

Controversy in Dublin, Ireland

Séamas Cain <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 12:23:28 -0500

75 lines

New Thread

ELVIS magical ELVIS

ELVIS magical ELVIS

Séamas Cain <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 12:44:41 -0500

130 lines

New Thread

Faber & Faber turn Eighty

Faber & Faber turn Eighty

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 May 2009 22:14:33 +0100

21 lines

Re: Faber & Faber turn Eighty

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 May 2009 09:30:03 -0600

52 lines

New Thread

Fogged Clarity

Fogged Clarity

Peter <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 May 2009 18:58:20 -0400

13 lines

Re: Fogged Clarity

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 May 2009 09:42:32 +0100

25 lines

Re: Fogged Clarity

Jon Corelis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 May 2009 14:56:26 +0100

25 lines

New Thread

from the Trading Post (Melbourne)

Re: from the Trading Post (Melbourne)

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 May 2009 10:09:57 +0100

58 lines

Re: from the Trading Post (Melbourne)

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 May 2009 13:56:18 +0100

58 lines

Re: from the Trading Post (Melbourne)

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 May 2009 06:54:01 +1000

72 lines

Re: from the Trading Post (Melbourne)

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 May 2009 00:28:47 -0400

88 lines

Re: from the Trading Post (Melbourne)

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 May 2009 12:40:56 +0800

108 lines

Re: from the Trading Post (Melbourne)

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 May 2009 17:47:49 +1000

125 lines

New Thread

FW: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

FW: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 17:45:52 +0100

52 lines

New Thread

Good article about our current greatest.

Good article about our current greatest.

Frederick Pollack <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 11:59:22 -0400

11 lines

Re: Good article about our current greatest.

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 10:30:46 +0800

23 lines

Re: Good article about our current greatest.

Martin Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 09:54:56 +0200

38 lines

New Thread

goodbye temporarily

goodbye temporarily

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 May 2009 08:26:28 +0800

16 lines

Re: goodbye temporarily

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 May 2009 06:27:38 +0100

38 lines

Re: goodbye temporarily

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 May 2009 08:36:09 -0600

62 lines

Re: goodbye temporarily

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 15:20:05 +0800

76 lines

Re: goodbye temporarily

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 00:36:10 -0700

82 lines

Re: goodbye temporarily

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 16:00:16 +0800

99 lines

Re: goodbye temporarily

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 01:06:14 -0700

105 lines

New Thread

Google's assault on writers' copyright

Google's assault on writers' copyright

Séamas Cain <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 2009 09:39:08 -0500

37 lines

New Thread

HiSpirits blog

HiSpirits blog

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 2009 17:26:11 +0800

27 lines

New Thread

holiday snap

holiday snap

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 10:53:50 +1000

98 lines

Re: holiday snap

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 10:03:20 +0800

123 lines

Re: holiday snap

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 05:29:40 +0100

116 lines

Re: holiday snap

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 01:02:06 -0400

114 lines

Re: holiday snap

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 07:25:41 +0100

115 lines

Re: holiday snap

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 08:01:33 +0100

113 lines

Re: holiday snap

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 May 2009 08:29:50 +1000

46 lines

New Thread

I just won a prize

I just won a prize

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 May 2009 07:35:22 +1000

27 lines

Re: I just won a prize

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 2009 14:43:45 -0700

39 lines

Re: I just won a prize

Randolph Healy <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 2009 22:57:07 +0100

30 lines

Re: I just won a prize

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 2009 16:36:16 -0600

54 lines

Re: I just won a prize

Peter <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 2009 21:58:58 -0400

46 lines

Re: I just won a prize

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 May 2009 12:43:13 +0800

43 lines

Re: I just won a prize

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 May 2009 09:24:02 +0100

44 lines

Re: I just won a prize

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 May 2009 10:20:47 -0400

54 lines

Re: I just won a prize

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 May 2009 02:08:50 +0300

36 lines

Re: I just won a prize

Kenneth Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 May 2009 19:21:09 -0400

19 lines

Re: I just won a prize

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 May 2009 14:25:03 +1000

27 lines

Re: I just won a prize

Glen Roy PHILLIPS <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 May 2009 13:57:52 +0800

32 lines

Re: I just won a prize

Martin Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 May 2009 18:38:02 +0200

38 lines

New Thread

interesting article

interesting article

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 2009 16:53:19 -0600

31 lines

New Thread

Jeff Harrison reviews two books

Jeff Harrison reviews two books

Séamas Cain <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 May 2009 16:06:22 -0500

42 lines

New Thread

job vacancy

Re: job vacancy

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 May 2009 14:39:45 +0100

33 lines

Re: job vacancy

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 May 2009 10:46:49 -0400

49 lines

New Thread

Judy Prince's POEMS (review)

Re: Judy Prince's POEMS (review)

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 May 2009 17:36:57 -0400

118 lines

Re: Judy Prince's POEMS (review)

Peter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 May 2009 18:00:39 -0400

117 lines

Re: Judy Prince's POEMS (review)

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 May 2009 18:08:33 +0100

118 lines

New Thread

Ken/"Childe Kenneth to the Dark Tower Came Back"

Ken/"Childe Kenneth to the Dark Tower Came Back"

Kenneth Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 May 2009 21:47:16 -0400

54 lines

Re: Ken/"Childe Kenneth to the Dark Tower Came Back"

Caleb Cluff <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 May 2009 12:02:42 +1000

71 lines

Re: Ken/"Childe Kenneth to the Dark Tower Came Back"

Martin Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 May 2009 11:35:40 +0200

71 lines

Re: Ken/"Childe Kenneth to the Dark Tower Came Back"

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 May 2009 18:35:12 +0800

80 lines

Re: Ken/"Childe Kenneth to the Dark Tower Came Back"

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 May 2009 08:55:15 -0600

39 lines

Re: Ken/"Childe Kenneth to the Dark Tower Came Back"

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 May 2009 11:02:48 +0100

71 lines

New Thread

Lawrence Upton's Choreography

Lawrence Upton's Choreography

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 23:53:34 +0800

31 lines

Re: Lawrence Upton's Choreography

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 19:38:46 +0100

82 lines

New Thread

Mackerelling

Mackerelling

Edmund Hardy <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 18:21:35 +0000

97 lines

New Thread

Mark's drool question reaps the whirlwind

Mark's drool question reaps the whirlwind

Kenneth Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 May 2009 07:07:54 -0400

96 lines

Re: Mark's drool question reaps the whirlwind

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 May 2009 09:38:52 -0400

111 lines

New Thread

more on Oxford

more on Oxford

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 May 2009 09:57:05 -0600

31 lines

Re: more on Oxford

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 May 2009 18:16:37 +0100

92 lines

Re: more on Oxford

Sally Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 May 2009 19:17:39 +0100

47 lines

Re: more on Oxford

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 May 2009 20:26:31 +0100

19 lines

Re: more on Oxford

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 May 2009 21:13:37 +0100

34 lines

Re: more on Oxford

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 May 2009 21:39:01 +0100

29 lines

Re: more on Oxford

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 May 2009 16:25:29 -0600

72 lines

Re: more on Oxford

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 May 2009 16:47:58 -0700

85 lines

New Thread

more on poets

more on poets

Martin Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 May 2009 11:53:07 +0200

18 lines

Re: more on poets

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 May 2009 09:37:07 -0400

44 lines

Re: more on poets

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 May 2009 10:50:30 -0400

17 lines

Re: more on poets

Jon Corelis <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 May 2009 09:40:50 -0500

27 lines

Re: more on poets

Martin Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 May 2009 17:26:58 +0200

66 lines

Re: more on poets

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 May 2009 08:45:38 -0600

45 lines

New Thread

My story project is now a play!

My story project is now a play!

Heather Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 May 2009 11:16:02 +0100

37 lines

Re: My story project is now a play!

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 May 2009 20:37:01 +0800

52 lines

Re: My story project is now a play!

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 May 2009 09:44:17 -0400

48 lines

Re: My story project is now a play!

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 May 2009 17:30:27 +0100

53 lines

Re: My story project is now a play!

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 May 2009 13:14:01 -0400

63 lines

Re: My story project is now a play!

Heather Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 May 2009 03:42:18 +0100

80 lines

Re: My story project is now a play!

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 May 2009 08:10:06 +0100

95 lines

Re: My story project is now a play!

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 May 2009 08:22:20 -0400

93 lines

New Thread

new World War I photos

new World War I photos

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 09:00:26 -0600

32 lines

Re: new World War I photos

Caleb Cluff <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 May 2009 10:28:53 +1000

42 lines

Re: new World War I photos

bj omanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 22:02:38 -0400

55 lines

Re: new World War I photos

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 May 2009 08:58:02 +0100

52 lines

New Thread

Notice: COMING UP AT PERTH POETRY CLUB

Notice: COMING UP AT PERTH POETRY CLUB

Janet Jackson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 19:17:27 +0800

66 lines

New Thread

Notice: Mudlark

Notice: Mudlark

William Slaughter <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 2009 10:10:39 -0400

29 lines

New Thread

Numinous: Spiritual Poetry, Issue 3 now online

Numinous: Spiritual Poetry, Issue 3 now online

JT Chan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 May 2009 00:18:19 -0700

50 lines

New Thread

Obama, The Exhibit - Some documentation

Obama, The Exhibit - Some documentation

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 2009 11:56:56 -0700

32 lines

New Thread

offline

offline

sharon brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 2009 10:35:49 -0600

14 lines

Re: offline

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 2009 19:25:14 +0100

30 lines

Re: offline

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 2009 11:42:18 -0700

41 lines

Re: offline

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 2009 15:18:59 -0400

68 lines

New Thread

online treasures

online treasures

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 May 2009 09:01:58 +1000

54 lines

Re: online treasures

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 May 2009 06:17:06 +0100

76 lines

New Thread

oops!

oops!

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 May 2009 08:31:47 -0600

29 lines

Re: oops!

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 May 2009 18:06:17 +0100

48 lines

Re: oops!

Sally Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 May 2009 18:34:55 +0100

65 lines

Re: oops!

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 May 2009 18:48:39 +0100

82 lines

Re: oops!

Geoffrey Gatza <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 May 2009 16:22:19 -0400

88 lines

Re: oops!

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 May 2009 23:26:26 +0300

39 lines

Re: oops!

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 May 2009 23:26:58 +0300

47 lines

Re: oops!

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 May 2009 23:27:31 +0300

53 lines

Re: oops!

Sally Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 May 2009 22:59:22 +0100

96 lines

Re: oops!

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 May 2009 23:14:36 +0100

117 lines

Re: oops!

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 May 2009 19:11:24 -0400

128 lines

Re: oops!

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 05:27:10 +0100

148 lines

Re: oops!

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 07:19:42 +0100

166 lines

Re: oops!

Sally Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 08:30:34 +0100

103 lines

Re: oops!

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 09:37:04 +0100

123 lines

Re: oops!

Dominic Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 10:13:56 +0100

23 lines

Re: oops!

Sally Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 10:17:12 +0100

141 lines

Re: oops!

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 10:57:13 +0100

53 lines

Re: oops!

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 10:57:56 +0100

89 lines

Re: oops!

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 11:03:58 +0100

30 lines

Re: oops!

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 11:01:19 +0100

134 lines

Re: oops!

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 11:45:59 +0100

154 lines

Re: oops!

Sally Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 12:14:44 +0100

37 lines

Re: oops!

Sally Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 12:17:24 +0100

149 lines

Re: oops!

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 08:31:27 -0600

63 lines

Re: oops!

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 10:38:42 -0700

84 lines

Re: oops!

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 May 2009 08:10:24 -0600

70 lines

New Thread

pat snap -(*^*)- Wednesday, 20 May 2009

pat snap -(*^*)- Wednesday, 20 May 2009

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 2009 09:38:41 +0100

33 lines

New Thread

pat snap ^*^*^^*^Wednesday, 13 May 2009

pat snap ^*^*^^*^Wednesday, 13 May 2009

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 08:06:50 +0100

53 lines

Re: pat snap ^*^*^^*^Wednesday, 13 May 2009

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 08:32:53 -0600

35 lines

Re: pat snap ^*^*^^*^Wednesday, 13 May 2009

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 08:26:32 -0600

37 lines

Re: pat snap ^*^*^^*^Wednesday, 13 May 2009

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 10:39:42 -0400

61 lines

New Thread

pat snaps "-_+:+_-" Wednesday, 06 May 2009

pat snaps "-_+:+_-" Wednesday, 06 May 2009

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 May 2009 06:36:11 +0100

35 lines

Re: pat snaps "-_+:+_-" Wednesday, 06 May 2009

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 May 2009 08:41:45 -0600

34 lines

New Thread

pat snaps "-_+:+_-" Wednesday, 06 May 2009 correcction!

Re: pat snaps "-_+:+_-" Wednesday, 06 May 2009 correcction!

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 May 2009 16:58:34 +0100

61 lines

New Thread

pat snap^*^*^Wednesday, 27 May 2009

pat snap^*^*^Wednesday, 27 May 2009

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 07:17:13 +0100

29 lines

Re: pat snap^*^*^Wednesday, 27 May 2009

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 08:20:48 -0600

54 lines

New Thread

pat snap^*^*^Wednesday, 27 May 2009 revised

pat snap^*^*^Wednesday, 27 May 2009 revised

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 17:23:51 +0100

25 lines

Re: pat snap^*^*^Wednesday, 27 May 2009 revised

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 22:59:32 +0300

31 lines

New Thread

Perth Poetry Club: STEVE SMART 23 May; Simon Cox, Marcella Polain & more later. Spread the word.

Perth Poetry Club: STEVE SMART 23 May; Simon Cox, Marcella Polain & more later. Spread the word.

Janet Jackson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 2009 23:10:17 +0800

60 lines

New Thread

Poem - Slow Study

Poem - Slow Study

Tina Bass <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 May 2009 21:36:41 +0000

70 lines

Re: Poem - Slow Study

Ana Olinto <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 2009 06:46:25 -0300

88 lines

Re: Poem - Slow Study

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 May 2009 10:08:52 +0800

104 lines

Re: Poem - Slow Study

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 May 2009 12:57:55 +1000

122 lines

Re: Poem - Slow Study

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 May 2009 13:42:25 +0800

138 lines

Re: Poem - Slow Study

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 May 2009 07:10:55 +0100

150 lines

Re: Poem - Slow Study

Tina Bass <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 May 2009 07:11:46 +0000

128 lines

Re: Poem - Slow Study

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 May 2009 08:56:28 +0100

85 lines

Re: Poem - Slow Study

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 May 2009 09:00:34 -0600

38 lines

Re: Poem - Slow Study

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 May 2009 09:02:24 -0600

47 lines

Re: Poem - Slow Study

Ana Olinto <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 2009 15:29:19 -0300

69 lines

Re: Poem - Slow Study

Ana Olinto <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jan 2003 11:01:16 -0200

58 lines

Re: Poem - Slow Study

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 May 2009 16:58:37 -0400

77 lines

New Thread

poem, notsnap

poem, notsnap

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 May 2009 01:06:22 +0300

50 lines

Re: poem, notsnap

Martin Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 May 2009 13:52:59 +0200

64 lines

Re: poem, notsnap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 May 2009 08:30:51 -0600

37 lines

Re: poem, notsnap

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 May 2009 18:05:50 +0100

84 lines

New Thread

Poem: Dream song 4 by John Berryman

Poem: Dream song 4 by John Berryman

Jon Corelis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 23:22:23 -0500

43 lines

Re: Poem: Dream song 4 by John Berryman

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 12:50:20 +0800

69 lines

Re: Poem: Dream song 4 by John Berryman

Kenneth Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 08:51:58 -0400

74 lines

Re: Poem: Dream song 4 by John Berryman

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 09:11:36 -0600

100 lines

Re: Poem: Dream song 4 by John Berryman

Caleb Cluff <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 09:07:06 +1000

59 lines

New Thread

poem?

poem?

sharon brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 2009 09:22:43 -0600

39 lines

Re: poem?

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 2009 18:32:16 +0300

48 lines

Re: poem?

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 08:33:13 -0600

65 lines

New Thread

poetry professor

poetry professor

Martin Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 11:33:22 +0200

16 lines

Re: poetry professor

Kenneth Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 16:29:42 -0400

74 lines

Re: poetry professor

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 18:01:50 -0400

133 lines

Re: poetry professor

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 10:33:23 +0100

14 lines

Re: poetry professor

Kenneth Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 07:24:30 -0400

28 lines

Re: poetry professor

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 08:54:52 -0600

47 lines

Re: poetry professor

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 07:14:29 +0100

45 lines

Re: poetry professor

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 10:54:52 +0100

52 lines

Re: poetry professor

Dominic Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 11:11:46 +0100

18 lines

Re: poetry professor

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 12:11:58 +0100

56 lines

Re: poetry professor

Martin Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 13:22:22 +0200

64 lines

Re: poetry professor

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 13:00:03 +0100

45 lines

Re: poetry professor

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 13:53:48 +0100

44 lines

Re: poetry professor

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 09:14:51 -0400

123 lines

Re: poetry professor

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 09:56:00 -0600

40 lines

Re: poetry professor

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 12:57:47 -0400

51 lines

Re: poetry professor

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 May 2009 09:19:19 -0600

43 lines

New Thread

PS Re: Yet another question

PS Re: Yet another question

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 May 2009 20:03:18 -0400

29 lines

Re: PS Re: Yet another question

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 May 2009 21:04:27 +0100

44 lines

Re: PS Re: Yet another question

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 May 2009 17:46:25 -0700

59 lines

New Thread

PS.Re: Mark's drool question reaps the whirlwind

PS.Re: Mark's drool question reaps the whirlwind

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 May 2009 15:30:23 -0400

116 lines

New Thread

question (UK)

question (UK)

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 11:49:21 +1000

19 lines

Re: question (UK)

Caleb Cluff <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 11:56:06 +1000

30 lines

Re: question (UK)

Martin Dolan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 10:36:46 +0800

40 lines

Re: question (UK)

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 May 2009 23:00:43 -0400

21 lines

Re: question (UK)

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 06:32:17 +0100

47 lines

Re: question (UK)

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 04:46:34 -0400

55 lines

Re: question (UK)

Dominic Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 10:00:44 +0100

11 lines

Re: question (UK)

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 05:10:06 -0400

17 lines

Re: question (UK)

Martin Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 11:20:53 +0200

72 lines

Re: question (UK)

Dominic Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 10:33:53 +0100

13 lines

Re: question (UK)

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 07:07:07 -0400

82 lines

Re: question (UK)

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 12:15:08 +0100

75 lines

Re: question (UK)

Martin Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 14:02:35 +0200

103 lines

Re: question (UK)

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 08:32:01 -0400

127 lines

Re: question (UK)

Martin Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 14:56:08 +0200

150 lines

Re: question (UK)

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 10:01:42 -0400

188 lines

Re: question (UK)

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 10:06:37 -0400

132 lines

Re: question (UK)

Martin Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 16:30:08 +0200

51 lines

Re: question (UK)

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 11:13:37 -0400

69 lines

Re: question (UK)

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 11:26:07 -0400

20 lines

Re: question (UK)

Dominic Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 16:31:40 +0100

15 lines

Re: question (UK)

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 12:11:14 -0400

26 lines

Re: question (UK)

Martin Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 19:15:44 +0200

42 lines

Re: question (UK)

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 13:23:53 -0400

21 lines

Re: question (UK)

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 11:38:07 -0600

43 lines

Re: question (UK)

Martin Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 19:48:14 +0200

31 lines

Re: question (UK)

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 14:18:43 -0400

48 lines

Re: question (UK)

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 14:23:58 -0400

34 lines

Re: question (UK)

Martin Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 May 2009 00:55:55 +0200

66 lines

Re: question (UK)

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 19:25:48 -0400

79 lines

Re: question (UK)

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 16:35:15 -0700

134 lines

Re: question (UK)

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 May 2009 01:37:42 +0100

86 lines

Re: question (UK)

Martin Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 May 2009 15:18:46 +0200

97 lines

Re: question (UK)

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 May 2009 09:33:47 -0400

133 lines

Re: question (UK)

Martin Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 May 2009 16:00:24 +0200

195 lines

New Thread

Recent Nomadics Posts

Recent Nomadics Posts

Pierre Joris <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 11:04:52 -0400

44 lines

New Thread

remind, mind again

remind, mind again

peter ganick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 11:12:27 -0400

17 lines

remind, mind again

peter ganick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 11:32:15 -0400

16 lines

New Thread

Review copies of In Paran by Larissa Shmailo available

Review copies of In Paran by Larissa Shmailo available

Larissa Shmailo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 02:53:04 -0400

13 lines

New Thread

Robert Frank via Leo Rubenfein

Robert Frank via Leo Rubenfein

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 16:35:54 -0700

27 lines

New Thread

Robin Blaser (1925-1009) (fwd)

Robin Blaser (1925-1009) (fwd)

Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 08:22:47 +0100

18 lines

Re: Robin Blaser (1925-1009) (fwd)

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 08:18:31 -0600

41 lines

New Thread

Ruth Padel again

Ruth Padel again

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 May 2009 08:24:46 +0100

26 lines

Re: Ruth Padel again

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 May 2009 18:13:47 +1000

44 lines

Re: Ruth Padel again

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 May 2009 11:49:45 +0100

64 lines

Re: Ruth Padel again

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 May 2009 16:28:27 +0100

72 lines

Re: Ruth Padel again

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 May 2009 11:34:24 -0400

79 lines

Re: Ruth Padel again

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 May 2009 16:45:34 +0100

92 lines

Re: Ruth Padel again

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 May 2009 16:54:15 +0100

19 lines

Re: Ruth Padel again

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 May 2009 16:59:23 +0100

35 lines

Re: Ruth Padel again

Robin Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 May 2009 17:10:34 +0100

24 lines

Re: Ruth Padel again

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 May 2009 19:44:38 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

Salt Books Crisis

Salt Books Crisis

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 13:57:29 +0100

52 lines

Re: Salt Books Crisis

Cindy Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 2009 08:18:56 +0100

83 lines

Re: Salt Books Crisis

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 2009 20:16:29 +0800

103 lines

New Thread

snap

snap

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 May 2009 19:01:45 +1000

28 lines

Re: snap

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 May 2009 08:42:29 -0600

53 lines

Re: snap

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 07:45:18 +0100

44 lines

Re: snap

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 18:20:43 +1000

65 lines

Re: snap

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 04:58:13 -0400

55 lines

New Thread

snap 'not understood'

snap 'not understood'

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 23:10:30 +1000

84 lines

Re: snap 'not understood'

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 08:47:24 -0600

35 lines

New Thread

snap - there is a word for it

snap - there is a word for it

Jim Bennett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 00:54:50 +0100

33 lines

Re: snap - there is a word for it

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 05:30:47 +0100

50 lines

New Thread

Snap That Apparition

Snap That Apparition

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 2009 21:28:21 +0100

17 lines

Re: Snap That Apparition

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 2009 08:33:59 -0600

47 lines

Re: Snap That Apparition

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 May 2009 10:29:55 +1000

31 lines

Re: Snap That Apparition

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 May 2009 17:11:30 +0100

61 lines

Re: Snap That Apparition

Martin Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 May 2009 18:34:42 +0200

79 lines

Re: Snap That Apparition

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 May 2009 17:49:27 +0100

78 lines

Re: Snap That Apparition

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 May 2009 07:08:18 +1000

78 lines

New Thread

Snap- Chinese

Snap- Chinese

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 2009 08:31:44 +0100

29 lines

Re: Snap- Chinese

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 2009 20:13:57 -0400

52 lines

Re: Snap- Chinese

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 09:09:06 +0100

81 lines

New Thread

Snap/Ken--"C.D. Wright Printed in The New Yorker"

Snap/Ken--"C.D. Wright Printed in The New Yorker"

Kenneth Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 May 2009 21:23:02 -0400

50 lines

Re: Snap/Ken--"C.D. Wright Printed in The New Yorker"

Kenneth Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 May 2009 21:56:03 -0400

58 lines

Re: Snap/Ken--"C.D. Wright Printed in The New Yorker"

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 May 2009 09:06:54 -0600

39 lines

Re: Snap/Ken--"C.D. Wright Printed in The New Yorker"

Kenneth Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 May 2009 12:40:13 -0400

35 lines

New Thread

snap: BASS (late again)

snap: BASS (late again)

Tina Bass <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 2009 23:48:40 +0000

35 lines

Re: snap: BASS (late again)

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 May 2009 08:57:43 -0600

61 lines

Re: snap: BASS (late again)

Tina Bass <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 May 2009 21:04:02 +0000

89 lines

New Thread

snap: long 20th

snap: long 20th

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 May 2009 08:22:45 -0600

49 lines

Re: snap: long 20th

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 May 2009 17:32:47 +0100

67 lines

Re: snap: long 20th

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 May 2009 14:58:08 -0600

43 lines

New Thread

snappish late May

snappish late May

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 2009 09:37:30 -0600

47 lines

Re: snappish late May

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 2009 09:06:43 -0700

59 lines

Re: snappish late May

Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 2009 09:40:16 -0700

58 lines

New Thread

Spread the word: Perth Poetry Club 16 May: Aidan Coleman (SA) and Kate Wilson (Bunbury)

Spread the word: Perth Poetry Club 16 May: Aidan Coleman (SA) and Kate Wilson (Bunbury)

Janet Jackson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 23:17:37 +0800

75 lines

New Thread

Still-roughage repost "In the Early Fall of 1978..."

Still-roughage repost "In the Early Fall of 1978..."

Kenneth Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 May 2009 11:32:26 -0400

67 lines

Re: Still-roughage repost "In the Early Fall of 1978..."

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 May 2009 16:27:50 -0600

39 lines

New Thread

Strange days indeed

Strange days indeed

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 May 2009 23:17:22 +0100

24 lines

New Thread

Swamping Rains

Swamping Rains

Brian Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 2009 02:32:54 -0700

22 lines

Re: Swamping Rains

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 2009 13:32:49 +0300

62 lines

Re: Swamping Rains

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 May 2009 13:47:18 +1000

67 lines

Re: Swamping Rains

Brian Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 May 2009 22:39:42 -0700

48 lines

Re: Swamping Rains

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 May 2009 08:10:05 +0100

137 lines

Re: Swamping Rains

Brian Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 May 2009 01:42:53 -0700

85 lines

New Thread

Talking to the Animals

Talking to the Animals

sharon brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 May 2009 00:35:13 -0600

39 lines

Re: Talking to the Animals

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 May 2009 08:17:42 +0100

58 lines

Re: Talking to the Animals

Kenneth Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 May 2009 10:16:36 -0400

52 lines

Re: Talking to the Animals

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 May 2009 09:45:47 -0600

54 lines

Re: Talking to the Animals

sharon brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 May 2009 11:12:43 -0600

24 lines

New Thread

The Ghost Dance

The Ghost Dance

Séamas Cain <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 14:31:09 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

The Haiku Foundation

The Haiku Foundation

Séamas Cain <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 11:31:53 -0500

54 lines

New Thread

The poems of Patricia Brody

The poems of Patricia Brody

Séamas Cain <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 May 2009 10:17:08 -0500

47 lines

New Thread

Theoretically

Re: Theoretically

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 09:05:45 -0600

40 lines

Re: Theoretically

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 01:56:51 +0300

51 lines

New Thread

Theoretically ...

Theoretically ...

Jon Corelis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 2009 21:28:23 -0500

26 lines

Re: Theoretically ...

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 15:01:14 +0800

39 lines

Re: Theoretically ...

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 10:19:12 +0300

45 lines

Re: Theoretically ...

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 10:21:47 +0300

56 lines

Re: Theoretically ...

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 08:48:10 -0600

52 lines

New Thread

Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

Jon Corelis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 2009 21:38:06 -0500

28 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 09:18:40 +0100

43 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

Kenneth Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 05:55:02 -0400

38 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

Martin Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 13:32:21 +0200

72 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

Dominic Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 12:41:09 +0100

23 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

Kenneth Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 07:58:54 -0400

21 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

Kenneth Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 08:25:03 -0400

33 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 08:38:24 -0400

37 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

Martin Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 15:31:28 +0200

38 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 09:49:02 -0400

71 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

Martin Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 16:26:10 +0200

92 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

Jon Corelis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 09:10:42 -0500

26 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 08:58:27 -0600

67 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

Kenneth Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 11:46:44 -0400

45 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 17:02:11 +0100

112 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 18:19:05 +0100

134 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 13:31:36 -0400

151 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

Kenneth Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 13:37:51 -0400

20 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

Kenneth Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 14:28:00 -0400

27 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 14:40:38 -0400

114 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

John Herbert Cunningham <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 07:15:27 -0500

76 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 09:28:58 -0400

101 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

andrew burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 22:12:20 +0800

152 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

Dominic Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 15:18:41 +0100

30 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 10:26:36 -0400

98 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 08:39:41 -0600

62 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

John Herbert Cunningham <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 10:02:02 -0500

120 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 11:26:36 -0400

38 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 11:34:33 -0400

152 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

Jon Corelis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 10:24:28 -0500

25 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

Jon Corelis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 10:26:27 -0500

25 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

John Herbert Cunningham <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 10:43:02 -0500

60 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

John Herbert Cunningham <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 10:43:02 -0500

79 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 11:44:52 -0400

34 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 16:49:05 +0100

40 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 12:08:27 -0600

79 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

Martin Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 20:22:35 +0200

79 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 14:41:53 -0400

77 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 20:26:02 +0100

108 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 15:30:19 -0400

127 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 20:43:29 +0100

153 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

Alison Croggon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 07:45:12 +1000

30 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

John Herbert Cunningham <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 16:41:04 -0500

92 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 18:02:22 -0400

52 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 01:53:59 +0300

181 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

Martin Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 01:03:04 +0200

73 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

Martin Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 10:02:01 +0200

60 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 09:42:47 +0100

161 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 10:12:29 +0100

164 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 10:39:15 -0400

251 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 18:20:44 +0100

284 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 02:46:44 +0300

183 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 02:47:33 +0300

198 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 08:14:53 +0100

216 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 13:25:17 +0300

239 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

Jon Corelis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 09:03:04 -0500

21 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 22:32:13 -0400

310 lines

Re: Theoretically ... (corrected, what was I thinking)

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 May 2009 13:30:49 +0300

26 lines

New Thread

Theoretically perhaps

Re: Theoretically perhaps

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 15:08:21 -0600

53 lines

New Thread

These Hands Are Not Ours (Earl of Seacliff Art Workshop, 2009) available

These Hands Are Not Ours (Earl of Seacliff Art Workshop, 2009) available

JT Chan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 02:56:20 -0700

33 lines

New Thread

Thoughtmesh Snap

Thoughtmesh Snap

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 May 2009 13:24:26 +0100

24 lines

Re: Thoughtmesh Snap

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 May 2009 11:05:16 +0100

39 lines

Re: Thoughtmesh Snap

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 00:23:22 +0100

49 lines

Re: Thoughtmesh Snap

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 May 2009 01:28:26 +0300

32 lines

Re: Thoughtmesh Snap

Barry Alpert <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 May 2009 19:49:29 +0100

42 lines

Re: Thoughtmesh Snap

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 2009 18:15:07 +0300

57 lines

Re: Thoughtmesh Snap

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 2009 18:37:55 +0300

90 lines

Re: Thoughtmesh Snap

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 2009 11:47:00 -0400

121 lines

Re: Thoughtmesh Snap

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 2009 18:30:13 +0300

73 lines

Re: Thoughtmesh Snap

Martin Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 2009 18:06:18 +0200

144 lines

Re: Thoughtmesh Snap

Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 2009 12:13:12 -0400

168 lines

Re: Thoughtmesh Snap

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 2009 12:45:01 -0400

157 lines

Re: Thoughtmesh Snap

Martin Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 2009 19:11:16 +0200

191 lines

Re: Thoughtmesh Snap

kasper salonen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 2009 21:41:07 +0300

177 lines

Re: Thoughtmesh Snap

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 2009 15:13:40 -0400

208 lines

Re: Thoughtmesh Snap

David Bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 2009 20:49:52 +0100

242 lines

Re: Thoughtmesh Snap

Martin Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 2009 21:54:33 +0200

256 lines

Re: Thoughtmesh Snap

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 2009 16:01:56 -0400

277 lines

Re: Thoughtmesh Snap

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 2009 16:07:06 -0400

274 lines

Re: Thoughtmesh Snap

Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 06:37:03 +1000

41 lines

Re: Thoughtmesh Snap

Martin Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 00:49:44 +0200

80 lines

Re: Thoughtmesh Snap

Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 2009 21:20:36 -0400

111 lines

Re: Thoughtmesh Snap

Martin Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 10:35:48 +0200

165 lines

Re: Thoughtmesh Snap

Martin Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 11:02:31 +0200

19 lines

New Thread

Two great short reviews of Housecat Kung Fu by Geoffrey Gatza

Two great short reviews of Housecat Kung Fu by Geoffrey Gatza

Geoffrey Gatza <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 2009 23:57:13 -0400

146 lines

New Thread

UTQ 78:1- Annual Letters in Canada issue now available online

UTQ 78:1- Annual Letters in Canada issue now available online

UTP Journals <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 2009 14:12:50 -0400

170 lines

New Thread

Very Rough: "In the Fall of 1978..."

Very Rough: "In the Fall of 1978..."

Kenneth Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 May 2009 06:45:29 -0400

71 lines

New Thread

Walcott & His Discontents

Walcott & His Discontents

Kenneth Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 22:22:01 -0400

133 lines

Re: Walcott & His Discontents

Amanda Surkont <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 21:20:11 -0700

137 lines

Re: Walcott & His Discontents

Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 10:36:15 -0700

199 lines

Re: Walcott & His Discontents

Kenneth Wolman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 14:54:50 -0400

65 lines

Re: Walcott & His Discontents

Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 15:13:01 -0600

256 lines

New Thread

Yet another question

Yet another question

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 May 2009 13:30:32 -0400

22 lines

Re: Yet another question

Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 09:34:37 +0100

37 lines

Re: Yet another question

sharon brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 00:50:27 -0600

30 lines

Re: Yet another question

sharon brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 00:53:07 -0600

35 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager