JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB Archives

CCP4BB Archives


May 2009


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

2nd Announcement:Fragment screening library for protein crystallography (1 message)
3D LCD and glasses (1 message)
64-bit ccp4 and coot for OS X (1 message)
anode lifetime? (1 message)
Another pointless question (2 messages)
Applications invited for PhD Projects in Structural Biology at the University of Auckland, New Zealand (1 message)
AW: [ccp4bb] Refolding of Denatured Protein (1 message)
bacculovirus pellet service (1 message)
BEAM TIME AVAILABLE FOR MACROMOLECULAR CRYSTALOPGRAPHY (1 message)
Beamtime proposal deadline for ALS GU time (1 message)
Bfactor as Measure of Presence (4 messages)
BioRad CFX96 for thermofluor/DSF? (1 message)
Call for proposals for biodeuteration [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (1 message)
Cancer Oriented Postdoctoral Position, Center for the Study of Systems Biology, Atlanta, GA, USA (1 message)
CCP4 compatability with other software suites (6 messages)
CCP4 Northern Protein Structure workshop 'Carla 2009' (1 message)
CCP4 updates and the problem pages (2 messages)
ccp4.setup file for environment-modules? (3 messages)
CCP4BB Digest - 4 May 2009 to 5 May 2009 (#2009-124) (2 messages)
CD spectroscopy sensitivity (2 messages)
Charge vs. pH plot Isoelectric titration curve ascii plotter (3 messages)
Complex degradation (2 messages)
Computer hardware and OS "survey" (33 messages)
coupling between occupancy and b-values in refinement (4 messages)
create cif for Zn atom (1 message)
Cryo-protectant (1 message)
Crystal Screen Optimization Server (1 message)
Crystallizing Fluorescent Molecules (4 messages)
desktop models (7 messages)
desktop models- summary (1 message)
Ecoli K12 SB536 (1 message)
error in ccp4i (2 messages)
ESRF Rolling access beamtime (1 message)
Experimental design and response surface methods for crystal optimization (3 messages)
failed compilation for Pointless (1 message)
FEBS Course Sofia 2009 (1 message)
Find water in coot (3 messages)
Florets- How to improve it (2 messages)
Fw: create cif for Zn atom (1 message)
Fwd: Aussie synchrotron sports sponsorship - very funny (1 message)
Glycerol as metal chelator? (4 messages)
Hanging vs. Sitting (7 messages)
homology modeling (8 messages)
How to improve crystal which is twinning? (7 messages)
how to optimize crystal without sharp boundary (2 messages)
Isomer images (2 messages)
issues with idiffdisp (2 messages)
issues with TLS refinement (5 messages)
issues with TLS refinement resolved (1 message)
Job offer at Rudolf Virchow Center (1 message)
job opening Biochemist/Enzymologist (f/m) (2 messages)
Last call for the 3rd workshop on Structural Virology (1 message)
Lost my protein (12 messages)
low resolution scaling + merging... negative scales! (1 message)
MAD phasing (2 messages)
MALLS equipment (1 message)
MALLS equipment: SUMMARY (1 message)
Manipulating electron density (7 messages)
March 15, 2009 deadline- User proposal submission for Collaborative Crystallography at BCSB (1 message)
Mercaptoethanol (4 messages)
Modeling DNA triple helices - MORCAD (1 message)
Mr Bump (1 message)
Na/K Phosphate (6 messages)
negative difference density in protein interiors (2 messages)
Off Topic, How to refine carbohydate chain using CNS (1 message)
Offtopic: Alscript question (2 messages)
Peptide on two-fold axis - was:[ccp4bb] PEG molecule crossing a two-fold crystallographic symmetry axis (4 messages)
pH sensitive fluorescent dye (2 messages)
phaser (3 messages)
Phasing at Low Resolution (15 messages)
phasing with se-met at low resolution (30 messages)
PhD Programme in Structural Biology in Vienna (1 message)
pointless question (5 messages)
positions for single molecule diffraction (1 message)
Post doc position at University of Alabama at Birmingham (1 message)
post-doc position available (1 message)
Post-doc position in Structural Biology and in silico Screening in New Zealand (1 message)
Post-doc positions at the Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI) (1 message)
Post-doctoral position available June 1st at UMDNJ (1 message)
Post-Doctoral Position in Ubiquitin Research (1 message)
postdoc in Dundee (1 message)
postdoc position available (1 message)
Postdoc position available at UT Southwestern Medical Center (1 message)
Postdoc position in London (1 message)
Postdoc position in protein crystallography (1 message)
Postdoc Position in Structural Biology of Membrane Proteins (1 message)
Postdoctoral position at the Wadsworth Center (1 message)
Postdoctoral Position Available in Structural Biology/Biophysics in Maryland, USA (1 message)
Postdoctoral Position in Structural Biology, Brisbane, Australia (1 message)
Postdoctoral Position, Center for the Study of Systems Biology, Atlanta, GA, USA (1 message)
Postdoctoral Research Position available at UT Southwestern Medical Center (1 message)
Practical Course for Macromolecular Crystallography M2M-2009 (1 message)
problem in transformation of pqe 30 clone (13 messages)
problem starting refmac from ccp4i gui (5 messages)
Problem with Rfree and Rfac (5 messages)
problem with unsorted mtz files (2 messages)
protein into inclusion body (1 message)
Protein Purification Research Associate position (1 message)
Pymol (6 messages)
Question about stereo on LCD monitor (1 message)
Question about twinning (2 messages)
question on Akta Prime (1 message)
Re :Re: [ccp4bb] MAD phasing (3 messages)
Recompiling LSQKAB (2 messages)
Recompiling REFMAC with larger MAXLINK (2 messages)
reference manager software (1 message)
Refining partially occupied DNA on top of itself (2 messages)
Refmac Question (2 messages)
Refmac5 error (2 messages)
Refolding of Denatured Protein (11 messages)
Research Associate in Time resolved Laue x-ray protein crystallography at Imperial College London (1 message)
research position at Glaxo SmithKline --North Carolina (1 message)
SCALEPACK2MTZ failed (4 messages)
Science magazine jobs RSS feed not longer available? (1 message)
Scientists position - Australian Synchrotron (1 message)
Seeding (1 message)
Senior Scientific Programmer Opening (1 message)
Senior X-ray Crystallographer Opening - BioFocus DPI (1 message)
shelxl LS refinement problem (4 messages)
shelxl LS refinement problem: summary (1 message)
side chain angle differences between monomers (1 message)
Slow growing protein crystals (1 message)
Software for RNA model building (4 messages)
Source Ta6Br12 for phasing (2 messages)
Subject: off topic, purification from insect media and TFF/CFF (1 message)
suitabel buffer condition for protein (2 messages)
SUMMARY:vSystem virtual machine recommendation for crystallography? (1 message)
Symposium: Light Microscopy meets Structural Biology, EMBL Heidelberg, June 22-23, 2009 (1 message)
System virtual machine recommendation for crystallography? (2 messages)
The X6A workbench: Advanced Structural Biology Tools, is back! (1 message)
Tips on fitting poorly defined loop regions (5 messages)
TLSANL gives zero off-diagonal ANISOU matrix in CCP4 6.1 (2 messages)
uniquefy and CELL dimension swap (2 messages)
use of siliconized cover glass (1 message)
xquartz alert (3 messages)
[ccp4-dev]: sfall atmmap resolution (2 messages)
[Fwd: totheboard] (2 messages)
[offtopic?] putting b-factors from two pdbs on the same scale and interpretation (3 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

2nd Announcement:Fragment screening library for protein crystallography

2nd Announcement:Fragment screening library for protein crystallography

John Badger <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 2009 18:24:32 +0100

27 lines

New Thread

3D LCD and glasses

3D LCD and glasses

Robert Esnouf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 May 2009 23:19:31 +0100

35 lines

New Thread

64-bit ccp4 and coot for OS X

64-bit ccp4 and coot for OS X

William G. Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 May 2009 18:36:47 -0700

25 lines

New Thread

anode lifetime?

anode lifetime?

Patrick Loll <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 May 2009 14:48:56 -0400

138 lines

New Thread

Another pointless question

Another pointless question

Ethan Merritt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 09:45:18 -0700

53 lines

Re: Another pointless question

Phil Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 18:36:28 +0100

79 lines

New Thread

Applications invited for PhD Projects in Structural Biology at the University of Auckland, New Zealand

Applications invited for PhD Projects in Structural Biology at the University of Auckland, New Zealand

Shaun Lott <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 May 2009 09:09:46 +1200

163 lines

New Thread

AW: [ccp4bb] Refolding of Denatured Protein

AW: [ccp4bb] Refolding of Denatured Protein

Jan Schoepe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 2009 05:15:28 -0700

62 lines

New Thread

bacculovirus pellet service

bacculovirus pellet service

Pius Padayatti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 May 2009 18:07:13 -0400

23 lines

New Thread

BEAM TIME AVAILABLE FOR MACROMOLECULAR CRYSTALOPGRAPHY

BEAM TIME AVAILABLE FOR MACROMOLECULAR CRYSTALOPGRAPHY

Cyndi Salbego <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 May 2009 14:14:52 -0500

61 lines

New Thread

Beamtime proposal deadline for ALS GU time

Beamtime proposal deadline for ALS GU time

Peter Zwart <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 00:58:44 -0700

73 lines

New Thread

Bfactor as Measure of Presence

Bfactor as Measure of Presence

James Stroud <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 May 2009 01:45:09 -0700

18 lines

Re: Bfactor as Measure of Presence

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 6 May 2009 14:59:31 +0200

41 lines

Re: Bfactor as Measure of Presence

Mark A. White <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 May 2009 14:01:27 -0500

123 lines

Re: Bfactor as Measure of Presence

James Holton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 May 2009 22:27:00 -0700

83 lines

New Thread

BioRad CFX96 for thermofluor/DSF?

Re: BioRad CFX96 for thermofluor/DSF?

Jürgen Bosch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 May 2009 14:06:29 -0400

73 lines

New Thread

Call for proposals for biodeuteration [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Call for proposals for biodeuteration [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

DUFF, Anthony <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 May 2009 13:44:00 +1000

169 lines

New Thread

Cancer Oriented Postdoctoral Position, Center for the Study of Systems Biology, Atlanta, GA, USA

Cancer Oriented Postdoctoral Position, Center for the Study of Systems Biology, Atlanta, GA, USA

Jessica Gilmore <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 May 2009 14:22:55 -0400

90 lines

New Thread

CCP4 compatability with other software suites

CCP4 compatability with other software suites

Wu, Zhongren <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 20:16:36 -0600

26 lines

Re: CCP4 compatability with other software suites

Paul Mcewan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 May 2009 09:29:49 +0100

68 lines

Re: CCP4 compatability with other software suites

Paul Mcewan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 May 2009 09:29:49 +0100

72 lines

Re: CCP4 compatability with other software suites

Wu, Zhongren <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 May 2009 07:17:53 -0600

212 lines

Re: CCP4 compatability with other software suites

Kevin Cowtan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 May 2009 14:43:50 +0100

26 lines

Re: CCP4 compatability with other software suites

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 May 2009 16:01:44 +0200

121 lines

New Thread

CCP4 Northern Protein Structure workshop 'Carla 2009'

CCP4 Northern Protein Structure workshop 'Carla 2009'

Mads Gabrielsen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 2009 08:55:22 +0100

74 lines

New Thread

CCP4 updates and the problem pages

CCP4 updates and the problem pages

Ben Eisenbraun <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 2009 18:35:58 -0400

25 lines

Re: CCP4 updates and the problem pages

William Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 2009 16:11:44 -0700

56 lines

New Thread

ccp4.setup file for environment-modules?

ccp4.setup file for environment-modules?

Matt Harrington <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 May 2009 17:30:13 -0700

28 lines

Re: ccp4.setup file for environment-modules?

Graeme Winter <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 May 2009 09:06:11 +0100

48 lines

Re: ccp4.setup file for environment-modules?

Paul Mcewan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 May 2009 09:14:10 +0100

543 lines

New Thread

CCP4BB Digest - 4 May 2009 to 5 May 2009 (#2009-124)

Re: CCP4BB Digest - 4 May 2009 to 5 May 2009 (#2009-124)

Geoffrey Feld <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 May 2009 16:36:45 -0700

71 lines

Re: CCP4BB Digest - 4 May 2009 to 5 May 2009 (#2009-124)

Dima Klenchin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 May 2009 19:15:52 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

CD spectroscopy sensitivity

CD spectroscopy sensitivity

Francisco J. Enguita <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 19:42:28 +0100

28 lines

Re: CD spectroscopy sensitivity

Guenter Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 20:59:50 +0200

59 lines

New Thread

Charge vs. pH plot Isoelectric titration curve ascii plotter

Charge vs. pH plot Isoelectric titration curve ascii plotter

Paul Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 May 2009 19:59:45 +0100

666 lines

Re: Charge vs. pH plot Isoelectric titration curve ascii plotter

Bernhard Rupp <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 May 2009 14:14:30 -0700

60 lines

Re: Charge vs. pH plot Isoelectric titration curve ascii plotter

Artem Evdokimov <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 May 2009 19:06:41 -0400

67 lines

New Thread

Complex degradation

Complex degradation

Office 2004 Test Drive User <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 09:02:20 -0400

17 lines

Re: Complex degradation

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 25 May 2009 10:02:52 +0200

35 lines

New Thread

Computer hardware and OS "survey"

Computer hardware and OS "survey"

Link,Todd M <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 May 2009 09:40:43 -0500

98 lines

Re: Computer hardware and OS "survey"

Roger Rowlett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 May 2009 10:58:56 -0400

107 lines

Re: Computer hardware and OS "survey"

Engin Ozkan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 May 2009 08:21:54 -0700

96 lines

Re: Computer hardware and OS "survey"

Ethan Merritt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 May 2009 08:21:40 -0700

58 lines

Re: Computer hardware and OS "survey"

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 1 May 2009 16:23:31 +0100

66 lines

Re: Computer hardware and OS "survey"

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 May 2009 10:42:52 -0500

95 lines

Re: Computer hardware and OS "survey"

William G. Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 May 2009 08:39:45 -0700

89 lines

Re: Computer hardware and OS "survey"

Partha Chakrabarti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 May 2009 17:01:32 +0100

257 lines

Re: Computer hardware and OS "survey"

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 1 May 2009 17:07:59 +0100

119 lines

Re: Computer hardware and OS "survey"

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 1 May 2009 12:50:16 -0400

144 lines

Re: Computer hardware and OS "survey"

Simon Kolstoe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 May 2009 18:17:46 +0100

361 lines

Re: Computer hardware and OS "survey"

Jon Wright <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 May 2009 19:22:39 +0200

18 lines

Re: Computer hardware and OS "survey"

Warren DeLano <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 May 2009 10:56:11 -0700

121 lines

Re: Computer hardware and OS "survey"

Link,Todd M <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 May 2009 12:59:43 -0500

463 lines

Re: Computer hardware and OS "survey"

Christopher Bahl <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 May 2009 16:02:26 -0400

82 lines

Re: Computer hardware and OS "survey"

Andreas Forster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 May 2009 21:12:34 +0100

287 lines

Re: Computer hardware and OS "survey"

Nicholas M Glykos <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 May 2009 13:32:47 +0300

31 lines

Re: Computer hardware and OS "survey"

mb1pja <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 May 2009 11:50:56 +0100

52 lines

Re: Computer hardware and OS "survey"

Peter Schmidtke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 May 2009 16:01:21 +0200

89 lines

Re: Computer hardware and OS "survey"

James Stroud <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 May 2009 16:31:17 -0700

34 lines

Re: Computer hardware and OS "survey"

John Badger <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 May 2009 02:46:00 +0100

37 lines

Re: Computer hardware and OS "survey"

James Stroud <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 May 2009 19:31:49 -0700

22 lines

Re: Computer hardware and OS "survey"

William G. Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 May 2009 21:33:12 -0700

23 lines

Re: Computer hardware and OS "survey"

Nicholas M Glykos <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 May 2009 12:03:13 +0300

28 lines

Re: Computer hardware and OS "survey"

iulek <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 May 2009 09:18:29 -0300

154 lines

Re: Computer hardware and OS "survey"

Anastassis Perrakis <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 May 2009 16:28:17 +0300

65 lines

Re: Computer hardware and OS "survey"

Nicholas M Glykos <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 May 2009 16:54:37 +0300

69 lines

Re: Computer hardware and OS "survey"

Anastassis Perrakis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 May 2009 00:48:35 +0300

35 lines

Re: Computer hardware and OS "survey"

Ed Pozharski <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 May 2009 14:53:43 -0400

62 lines

Re: Computer hardware and OS "survey"

Paul Paukstelis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 May 2009 14:02:24 -0500

44 lines

Re: Computer hardware and OS "survey"

Donnie Berkholz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 May 2009 14:48:46 -0700

48 lines

Re: Computer hardware and OS "survey"

Partha Chakrabarti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 May 2009 22:52:42 +0100

91 lines

Re: Computer hardware and OS "survey"

Paul Paukstelis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 May 2009 17:33:33 -0500

38 lines

New Thread

coupling between occupancy and b-values in refinement

coupling between occupancy and b-values in refinement

Patrick Loll <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 May 2009 11:58:52 -0400

144 lines

Re: coupling between occupancy and b-values in refinement

Poul Nissen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 May 2009 18:12:47 +0200

185 lines

Re: coupling between occupancy and b-values in refinement

George M. Sheldrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 May 2009 18:19:55 +0200

70 lines

Re: coupling between occupancy and b-values in refinement

Santarsiero, Bernard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 May 2009 11:23:59 -0500

87 lines

New Thread

create cif for Zn atom

create cif for Zn atom

Raja Dey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 00:55:58 +0530

53 lines

New Thread

Cryo-protectant

Cryo-protectant

Marcus Winter <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 May 2009 14:29:59 +0100

117 lines

New Thread

Crystal Screen Optimization Server

Crystal Screen Optimization Server

P Hubbard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 04:55:29 -0700

76 lines

New Thread

Crystallizing Fluorescent Molecules

Crystallizing Fluorescent Molecules

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 14:42:05 -0500

39 lines

Re: Crystallizing Fluorescent Molecules

V. Nagarajan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 12:51:02 -0700

56 lines

Re: Crystallizing Fluorescent Molecules

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 14 May 2009 19:20:58 -0400

71 lines

Re: Crystallizing Fluorescent Molecules

Phoebe Rice <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 19:03:05 -0500

126 lines

New Thread

desktop models

desktop models

Christopher Rife <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 2009 11:41:36 -0700

41 lines

Re: desktop models

Schubert, Carsten [PRDUS] <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 2009 15:04:15 -0400

77 lines

Re: desktop models

Prof. Joel L. Sussman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 2009 22:06:46 +0300

211 lines

Re: desktop models

Raji Edayathumangalam <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 2009 15:11:35 -0400

178 lines

Re: desktop models

Christopher Bahl <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 2009 15:45:35 -0400

69 lines

Re: desktop models

Andreas Förster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 2009 20:59:45 +0100

70 lines

Re: desktop models

mark michaels <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 2009 16:18:51 -0400

77 lines

New Thread

desktop models- summary

Re: desktop models- summary

Christopher Rife <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 May 2009 07:57:04 -0700

69 lines

New Thread

Ecoli K12 SB536

Ecoli K12 SB536

aka akaka <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 2009 18:14:12 +0000

58 lines

New Thread

error in ccp4i

error in ccp4i

Sebastiano Pasqualato <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 May 2009 15:38:36 +0200

46 lines

Re: error in ccp4i

William Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 May 2009 18:47:09 -0700

52 lines

New Thread

ESRF Rolling access beamtime

ESRF Rolling access beamtime

David FLOT <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 17:57:07 +0200

66 lines

New Thread

Experimental design and response surface methods for crystal optimization

Experimental design and response surface methods for crystal optimization

Benda, Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 16:06:43 +0200

28 lines

Re: Experimental design and response surface methods for crystal optimization

Charles W. Carter Jr. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 10:46:04 -0400

68 lines

Re: Experimental design and response surface methods for crystal optimization

Patrick Shaw Stewart <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 May 2009 14:12:52 +0100

60 lines

New Thread

failed compilation for Pointless

Re: failed compilation for Pointless

James Foadi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 2009 10:06:24 -0700

21 lines

New Thread

FEBS Course Sofia 2009

FEBS Course Sofia 2009

Rudolf Ladenstein <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 16:08:13 +0200

238 lines

New Thread

Find water in coot

Find water in coot

Raja Dey <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 May 2009 00:52:15 +0530

30 lines

Re: Find water in coot

Joe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 15:52:48 -0400

44 lines

Re: Find water in coot

Raja Dey <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 May 2009 01:39:39 +0530

59 lines

New Thread

Florets- How to improve it

Florets- How to improve it

james09 pruza <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 May 2009 16:12:32 +0530

43 lines

Re: Florets- How to improve it

Enrico Stura <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 May 2009 16:59:29 +0200

54 lines

New Thread

Fw: create cif for Zn atom

Fw: create cif for Zn atom

Raja Dey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 00:58:05 +0530

72 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Aussie synchrotron sports sponsorship - very funny

Fwd: Aussie synchrotron sports sponsorship - very funny

Ho-Leung Ng <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 May 2009 22:21:38 -0700

19 lines

New Thread

Glycerol as metal chelator?

Glycerol as metal chelator?

Ho-Leung Ng <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 11:19:32 -0700

21 lines

Re: Glycerol as metal chelator?

Guenter Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 21:57:41 +0200

58 lines

Re: Glycerol as metal chelator?

Artem Evdokimov <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 19:25:55 -0400

42 lines

Re: Glycerol as metal chelator?

Nadir T. Mrabet <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 16:15:19 +0200

60 lines

New Thread

Hanging vs. Sitting

Re: Hanging vs. Sitting

Bostjan Kobe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 May 2009 11:33:16 +1000

75 lines

Re: Hanging vs. Sitting

Frank von Delft <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 May 2009 04:01:39 +0100

98 lines

Re: Hanging vs. Sitting

Debajyoti Dutta <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 May 2009 05:35:06 -0000

102 lines

Re: Hanging vs. Sitting

Simon Kolstoe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 May 2009 08:44:51 +0100

168 lines

Re: Hanging vs. Sitting

Frank von Delft <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 May 2009 10:04:47 +0100

79 lines

Re: Hanging vs. Sitting

Joe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 May 2009 10:22:52 -0400

91 lines

Re: Hanging vs. Sitting

Bernhard Rupp <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 May 2009 09:31:19 -0700

322 lines

New Thread

homology modeling

homology modeling

rui <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 May 2009 23:39:50 -0400

38 lines

Re: homology modeling

Chen, Yu Wai <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 2009 09:39:04 +0100

28 lines

Re: homology modeling

Francisco J. Enguita <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 2009 09:49:38 +0100

59 lines

Re: homology modeling

Anastassis Perrakis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 2009 12:08:04 +0300

150 lines

Re: homology modeling

Peter Schmidtke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 2009 11:25:55 +0200

71 lines

Re: homology modeling

Rotem Sertchook <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 2009 13:09:05 +0300

233 lines

Re: homology modeling

Donnie Berkholz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 2009 17:32:11 -0700

55 lines

Re: homology modeling

Sue Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 May 2009 13:04:08 -0700

30 lines

New Thread

How to improve crystal which is twinning?

How to improve crystal which is twinning?

HanJie_HCT Tai <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 May 2009 08:27:07 -0400

108 lines

Re: How to improve crystal which is twinning?

Morten Sommer <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 May 2009 13:57:10 -0400

334 lines

Re: How to improve crystal which is twinning?

Ho-Leung Ng <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 May 2009 18:25:08 -0700

20 lines

Re: How to improve crystal which is twinning?

Annie Hassell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 May 2009 09:34:12 -0400

210 lines

Re: How to improve crystal which is twinning?

Ho-Leung Ng <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 2009 15:39:37 -0700

55 lines

Re: How to improve crystal which is twinning?

Annie Hassell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 2009 19:12:46 -0400

239 lines

Re: How to improve crystal which is twinning?

Patrick Shaw Stewart <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 May 2009 14:10:13 +0100

365 lines

New Thread

how to optimize crystal without sharp boundary

how to optimize crystal without sharp boundary

Jerry McCully <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 2009 09:19:08 -0700

72 lines

Re: how to optimize crystal without sharp boundary

Kay Diederichs <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 2009 18:46:56 +0200

144 lines

New Thread

Isomer images

Isomer images

Haitao ZHANG <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 09:28:07 +0800

72 lines

Re: Isomer images

Andy Torelli <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 09:31:50 -0400

45 lines

New Thread

issues with idiffdisp

issues with idiffdisp

James Foadi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 2009 04:02:09 -0700

36 lines

Re: issues with idiffdisp

James Foadi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 2009 08:54:24 -0700

138 lines

New Thread

issues with TLS refinement

issues with TLS refinement

Seema Mittal <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 2009 13:32:45 -0400

107 lines

Re: issues with TLS refinement

Dima Klenchin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 2009 18:39:20 -0500

27 lines

Re: issues with TLS refinement

Roberto Steiner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 08:04:08 +0100

42 lines

Re: issues with TLS refinement

Leonard Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 11:40:03 -0500

155 lines

issues with TLS refinement

Seema Mittal <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 17:02:27 -0400

101 lines

New Thread

issues with TLS refinement resolved

issues with TLS refinement resolved

Seema Mittal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 2009 13:56:55 -0400

41 lines

New Thread

Job offer at Rudolf Virchow Center

Job offer at Rudolf Virchow Center

Jochen Kuper <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 15:48:42 +0200

181 lines

New Thread

job opening Biochemist/Enzymologist (f/m)

job opening Biochemist/Enzymologist (f/m)

Dr. Dirk Kessler <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 May 2009 13:55:31 +0100

61 lines

job opening Biochemist/Enzymologist (f/m)

Dr. Dirk Kessler <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 May 2009 14:13:01 +0100

102 lines

New Thread

Last call for the 3rd workshop on Structural Virology

Last call for the 3rd workshop on Structural Virology

Aitor Hierro <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 11:16:28 +0200

14574 lines

New Thread

Lost my protein

Lost my protein

yanming Zhang <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 2009 09:06:09 -0700

32 lines

Re: Lost my protein

mesters <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 2009 18:22:48 +0200

59 lines

Re: Lost my protein

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 2009 11:34:19 -0500

125 lines

Re: Lost my protein

Kornelius Zeth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 2009 19:30:42 +0200

43 lines

Re: Lost my protein

Joe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 2009 14:27:15 -0400

71 lines

Re: Lost my protein

Matthew Alan Bratkowski <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 2009 15:44:47 -0400

23 lines

Re: Lost my protein

Jan Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 2009 15:47:21 -0500

51 lines

Re: Lost my protein

Sophia Tsai <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 2009 18:42:37 -0700

35 lines

Re: Lost my protein

Li Sheng <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 May 2009 09:52:35 +0800

212 lines

Re: Lost my protein

atul kumar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 May 2009 10:48:58 +0530

92 lines

Re: Lost my protein

Jobichen Chacko <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 May 2009 15:45:43 +1000

105 lines

Re: Lost my protein

Ho-Leung Ng <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 May 2009 21:35:44 -0700

20 lines

New Thread

low resolution scaling + merging... negative scales!

low resolution scaling + merging... negative scales!

Francis E Reyes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 2009 12:16:06 -0600

27 lines

New Thread

MAD phasing

MAD phasing

Ethayathulla Abdulsamath <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 22:38:00 -0000

120 lines

Re: MAD phasing

Ho-Leung Ng <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 2009 16:53:04 -0700

18 lines

New Thread

MALLS equipment

MALLS equipment

Marc Graille <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 16:32:26 +0200

28 lines

New Thread

MALLS equipment: SUMMARY

MALLS equipment: SUMMARY

Marc Graille <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 May 2009 16:49:26 +0200

34 lines

New Thread

Manipulating electron density

Manipulating electron density

Jason Porta <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 May 2009 21:19:26 +0100

32 lines

Re: Manipulating electron density

Carlos Huerta <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 May 2009 18:53:35 -0500

54 lines

Re: Manipulating electron density

Phoebe Rice <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 May 2009 14:21:20 -0500

79 lines

Re: Manipulating electron density

James Stroud <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 May 2009 20:29:00 -0700

26 lines

Re: Manipulating electron density

Phoebe Rice <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 2009 10:40:23 -0500

59 lines

Re: Manipulating electron density

Carlos Huerta <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 2009 10:56:01 -0500

97 lines

Re: Manipulating electron density

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 2009 17:31:37 +0100

35 lines

New Thread

March 15, 2009 deadline- User proposal submission for Collaborative Crystallography at BCSB

March 15, 2009 deadline- User proposal submission for Collaborative Crystallography at BCSB

Banumathi Sankaran <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 12:33:57 -0700

54 lines

New Thread

Mercaptoethanol

Mercaptoethanol

Wataru Kagawa <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 11:17:41 +0900

21 lines

Re: Mercaptoethanol

Wataru Kagawa <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 11:59:26 +0900

46 lines

Re: Mercaptoethanol

Artem Evdokimov <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 19:34:32 -0400

48 lines

Re: Mercaptoethanol

Charlie Bond <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 10:21:17 +0800

30 lines

New Thread

Modeling DNA triple helices - MORCAD

Modeling DNA triple helices - MORCAD

Kristof Van Hecke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 May 2009 14:24:49 +0200

142 lines

New Thread

Mr Bump

Mr Bump

Thierry Granier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 May 2009 15:46:03 +0200

105 lines

New Thread

Na/K Phosphate

Na/K Phosphate

Geoffrey Kwai Wai Kong <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 17:43:01 +1000

24 lines

Re: Na/K Phosphate

Guenter Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 10:33:59 +0200

59 lines

Re: Na/K Phosphate

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 14 May 2009 09:37:05 -0400

41 lines

Re: Na/K Phosphate

Annie Hassell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 10:53:17 -0400

105 lines

Re: Na/K Phosphate

P Hubbard <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 12:15:36 -0700

128 lines

Re: Na/K Phosphate

Shveta Bisht <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 14:08:58 +0530

31 lines

New Thread

negative difference density in protein interiors

negative difference density in protein interiors

Laurie Betts <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 May 2009 16:29:40 -0400

26 lines

Re: negative difference density in protein interiors

Clemens Vonrhein <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 May 2009 17:55:03 +0100

59 lines

New Thread

Off Topic, How to refine carbohydate chain using CNS

Off Topic, How to refine carbohydate chain using CNS

lidefeng <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 11:18:44 +0800

102 lines

New Thread

Offtopic: Alscript question

Offtopic: Alscript question

Andy Torelli <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 10:08:53 -0400

35 lines

Re: Offtopic: Alscript question

Charlie Bond <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 2009 09:42:13 +0800

66 lines

New Thread

Peptide on two-fold axis - was:[ccp4bb] PEG molecule crossing a two-fold crystallographic symmetry axis

Re: Peptide on two-fold axis - was:[ccp4bb] PEG molecule crossing a two-fold crystallographic symmetry axis

lidefeng <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 May 2009 20:47:39 +0800

173 lines

Re: Peptide on two-fold axis - was:[ccp4bb] PEG molecule crossing a two-fold crystallographic symmetry axis

Kris Tesh <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 May 2009 08:28:44 -0500

412 lines

Re: Peptide on two-fold axis - was:[ccp4bb] PEG molecule crossing a two-fold crystallographic symmetry axis

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 4 May 2009 11:40:14 +0200

157 lines

Re: Peptide on two-fold axis - was:[ccp4bb] PEG molecule crossing a two-fold crystallographic symmetry axis

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 4 May 2009 12:19:39 +0200

151 lines

New Thread

pH sensitive fluorescent dye

pH sensitive fluorescent dye

Daniel Jin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 08:59:00 -0700

69 lines

Re: pH sensitive fluorescent dye

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 11:35:00 -0500

252 lines

New Thread

phaser

phaser

Aaron Alt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 17:50:22 +0200

17 lines

Re: phaser

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 2009 08:04:34 +0200

48 lines

Re: phaser

Nathaniel Echols <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 2009 10:20:11 -0700

53 lines

New Thread

Phasing at Low Resolution

Phasing at Low Resolution

Clemens Grimm <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 09:35:28 +0200

24 lines

Re: Phasing at Low Resolution

Georg Zocher <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 10:44:46 +0200

49 lines

Re: Phasing at Low Resolution

Clemens Grimm <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 12:26:16 +0200

100 lines

Re: Phasing at Low Resolution

Phoebe Rice <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 10:51:45 -0500

54 lines

Re: Phasing at Low Resolution

Pete Meyer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 13:31:41 -0500

113 lines

Re: Phasing at Low Resolution

Martin Jinek <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 11:29:39 -0700

20 lines

Re: Phasing at Low Resolution

Guangyu Zhu <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 15:03:57 -0400

122 lines

Re: Phasing at Low Resolution

riya doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 15:41:38 -0400

40 lines

Re: Phasing at Low Resolution

Roger Rowlett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 16:05:33 -0400

70 lines

Re: Phasing at Low Resolution

J. Preben Morth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 22:16:46 +0200

55 lines

Re: Phasing at Low Resolution

Pete Meyer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 15:51:14 -0500

129 lines

Re: Phasing at Low Resolution

Guangyu Zhu <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 17:05:14 -0400

43 lines

Re: Phasing at Low Resolution

Charlie Bond <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 11:11:20 +0800

78 lines

Re: Phasing at Low Resolution

Clemens Vonrhein <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 09:39:50 +0100

42 lines

Re: Phasing at Low Resolution

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 15 May 2009 14:57:09 +0200

121 lines

New Thread

phasing with se-met at low resolution

phasing with se-met at low resolution

Engin Ozkan <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 May 2009 14:01:15 -0700

46 lines

Re: phasing with se-met at low resolution

Soisson, Stephen M <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 May 2009 17:38:59 -0400

90 lines

Re: phasing with se-met at low resolution

Leiman Petr <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 May 2009 23:50:05 +0200

91 lines

Re: phasing with se-met at low resolution

Van Den Berg, Bert <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 May 2009 19:03:07 -0400

220 lines

Re: phasing with se-met at low resolution

Engin Ozkan <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 May 2009 20:24:34 -0700

121 lines

Re: phasing with se-met at low resolution

J. Preben Morth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 2009 11:21:32 +0200

185 lines

Re: phasing with se-met at low resolution

Clemens Vonrhein <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 2009 16:45:45 +0100

36 lines

Re: phasing with se-met at low resolution

Pete Meyer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 2009 17:22:25 -0500

32 lines

Re: phasing with se-met at low resolution

Clemens Vonrhein <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 12:54:30 +0100

81 lines

Re: phasing with se-met at low resolution

James Holton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 11:26:55 -0700

113 lines

Re: phasing with se-met at low resolution

Clemens Vonrhein <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 20:03:49 +0100

77 lines

Re: phasing with se-met at low resolution

Engin Ozkan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 12:20:31 -0700

147 lines

Re: phasing with se-met at low resolution

Clemens Vonrhein <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 21:09:39 +0100

72 lines

Re: phasing with se-met at low resolution

Phil Jeffrey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 16:47:23 -0400

32 lines

Re: phasing with se-met at low resolution

Raja Dey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 03:41:46 +0530

283 lines

Re: phasing with se-met at low resolution

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 01:13:52 +0200

33 lines

Re: phasing with se-met at low resolution

Kevin Cowtan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 09:14:57 +0100

77 lines

Re: phasing with se-met at low resolution

Marc SCHILTZ <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 12:26:24 +0200

103 lines

Re: phasing with se-met at low resolution

Kevin Cowtan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 11:49:00 +0100

24 lines

Re: phasing with se-met at low resolution

Ian Tickle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 12:03:53 +0100

164 lines

Re: phasing with se-met at low resolution

Marc SCHILTZ <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 13:18:27 +0200

124 lines

Re: phasing with se-met at low resolution

Marc SCHILTZ <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 14:35:09 +0200

542 lines

Re: phasing with se-met at low resolution

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 11:30:06 -0500

22 lines

Re: phasing with se-met at low resolution

Ethan Merritt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 10:12:34 -0700

50 lines

Re: phasing with se-met at low resolution

Patrick Loll <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 13:22:54 -0400

208 lines

Re: phasing with se-met at low resolution

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 12:31:50 -0500

88 lines

Re: phasing with se-met at low resolution

Ethan Merritt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 10:48:39 -0700

80 lines

Re: phasing with se-met at low resolution

Ethan Merritt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 10:54:51 -0700

116 lines

Re: phasing with se-met at low resolution

Engin Ozkan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 2009 00:48:09 -0700

77 lines

Re: phasing with se-met at low resolution

Engin Ozkan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 2009 00:48:09 -0700

80 lines

New Thread

PhD Programme in Structural Biology in Vienna

PhD Programme in Structural Biology in Vienna

Kristina Djinovic Carugo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 May 2009 11:58:20 +0200

103 lines

New Thread

pointless question

pointless question

Robert Nolte <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 May 2009 14:21:41 -0400

119 lines

Re: pointless question

Robert Nolte <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 May 2009 15:01:11 -0400

129 lines

Re: pointless question

Phil Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 May 2009 22:28:43 +0100

149 lines

Re: pointless question

Phil Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 May 2009 12:52:39 +0100

185 lines

Re: pointless question

Phil Jeffrey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 May 2009 11:38:16 -0400

178 lines

New Thread

positions for single molecule diffraction

positions for single molecule diffraction

Marius Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 May 2009 23:33:45 +0200

46 lines

New Thread

Post doc position at University of Alabama at Birmingham

Post doc position at University of Alabama at Birmingham

Heidi Erlandsen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 10:26:48 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

post-doc position available

post-doc position available

R. J. Lewis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 May 2009 11:00:32 +0100

47 lines

New Thread

Post-doc position in Structural Biology and in silico Screening in New Zealand

Post-doc position in Structural Biology and in silico Screening in New Zealand

Shaun Lott <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 May 2009 22:52:40 +0100

1101 lines

New Thread

Post-doc positions at the Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI)

Post-doc positions at the Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI)

Anastassis Perrakis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 2009 19:15:30 +0200

102 lines

New Thread

Post-doctoral position available June 1st at UMDNJ

Post-doctoral position available June 1st at UMDNJ

Narayanan Ramasubbu <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 2009 22:34:24 -0400

22 lines

New Thread

Post-Doctoral Position in Ubiquitin Research

Post-Doctoral Position in Ubiquitin Research

Sirano Dhe-Paganon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 22:07:51 -0400

33 lines

New Thread

postdoc in Dundee

postdoc in Dundee

Daan van Aalten <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 May 2009 17:38:04 +0100

110 lines

New Thread

postdoc position available

postdoc position available

Wen Jiang <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 2009 21:23:36 -0400

24 lines

New Thread

Postdoc position available at UT Southwestern Medical Center

Postdoc position available at UT Southwestern Medical Center

Xuelian Sue Luo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 18:06:45 +0100

34 lines

New Thread

Postdoc position in London

Postdoc position in London

Katrin Rittinger <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 May 2009 13:09:07 +0100

155 lines

New Thread

Postdoc position in protein crystallography

Postdoc position in protein crystallography

Clemens Steegborn <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 May 2009 12:42:05 +0200

309 lines

New Thread

Postdoc Position in Structural Biology of Membrane Proteins

Postdoc Position in Structural Biology of Membrane Proteins

Christopher Law <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 May 2009 19:42:45 -0400

32 lines

New Thread

Postdoctoral position at the Wadsworth Center

Postdoctoral position at the Wadsworth Center

Hongmin Li <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 16:54:19 -0400

120 lines

New Thread

Postdoctoral Position Available in Structural Biology/Biophysics in Maryland, USA

Postdoctoral Position Available in Structural Biology/Biophysics in Maryland, USA

Scott Walsh <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 17:08:00 +0100

29 lines

New Thread

Postdoctoral Position in Structural Biology, Brisbane, Australia

Postdoctoral Position in Structural Biology, Brisbane, Australia

Justine Hill <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 May 2009 20:53:39 +1000

242 lines

New Thread

Postdoctoral Position, Center for the Study of Systems Biology, Atlanta, GA, USA

Postdoctoral Position, Center for the Study of Systems Biology, Atlanta, GA, USA

Jessica Gilmore <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 May 2009 14:22:47 -0400

85 lines

New Thread

Postdoctoral Research Position available at UT Southwestern Medical Center

Postdoctoral Research Position available at UT Southwestern Medical Center

Diana Tomchick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 12:29:15 -0500

68 lines

New Thread

Practical Course for Macromolecular Crystallography M2M-2009

Practical Course for Macromolecular Crystallography M2M-2009

Victor Lamzin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 17:57:10 +0200

46 lines

New Thread

problem in transformation of pqe 30 clone

Re: problem in transformation of pqe 30 clone

atul kumar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 May 2009 18:05:58 +0530

462 lines

Re: problem in transformation of pqe 30 clone

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 4 May 2009 09:02:13 -0400

209 lines

Re: problem in transformation of pqe 30 clone

atul kumar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 May 2009 19:34:54 +0530

519 lines

Re: problem in transformation of pqe 30 clone

Engin Ozkan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 May 2009 07:29:08 -0700

540 lines

Re: problem in transformation of pqe 30 clone

Mensur Dlakic <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 May 2009 08:41:52 -0600

254 lines

Re: problem in transformation of pqe 30 clone

Cynthia Kinsland <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 May 2009 10:52:50 -0400

148 lines

Re: problem in transformation of pqe 30 clone

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 4 May 2009 13:06:56 -0400

249 lines

Re: problem in transformation of pqe 30 clone

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 4 May 2009 21:57:12 +0200

46 lines

Re: problem in transformation of pqe 30 clone

Raji Edayathumangalam <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 May 2009 16:08:03 -0400

69 lines

Re: problem in transformation of pqe 30 clone

Ho-Leung Ng <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 May 2009 17:27:58 -0700

32 lines

Re: problem in transformation of pqe 30 clone

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 4 May 2009 20:54:29 -0400

45 lines

Re: problem in transformation of pqe 30 clone

atul kumar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 May 2009 10:40:05 +0530

163 lines

Re: problem in transformation of pqe 30 clone

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 6 May 2009 08:40:56 -0400

103 lines

New Thread

problem starting refmac from ccp4i gui

problem starting refmac from ccp4i gui

Boaz Shaanan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 May 2009 09:30:44 GMT

110 lines

Re: problem starting refmac from ccp4i gui

Kay Diederichs <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 May 2009 12:42:04 +0200

177 lines

Re: problem starting refmac from ccp4i gui

Miguel Ortiz Lombardia <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 May 2009 14:08:39 +0200

104 lines

Re: problem starting refmac from ccp4i gui

Boaz Shaanan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 May 2009 12:10:13 GMT

258 lines

Re: problem starting refmac from ccp4i gui

Boaz Shaanan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 May 2009 12:57:58 GMT

299 lines

New Thread

Problem with Rfree and Rfac

Problem with Rfree and Rfac

Sravanti Vaidya <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 14:40:15 +0100

52 lines

Re: Problem with Rfree and Rfac

Navdeep Sidhu <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 11:54:47 -0600

19 lines

Re: Problem with Rfree and Rfac

tara kashav <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 2009 01:35:50 +0530

49 lines

Re: Problem with Rfree and Rfac

Anastassis Perrakis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 2009 12:56:23 +0200

207 lines

Re: Problem with Rfree and Rfac

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 May 2009 10:47:48 +0100

59 lines

New Thread

problem with unsorted mtz files

problem with unsorted mtz files

Rita GIORDANO <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 15:28:06 +0200

51 lines

Re: problem with unsorted mtz files

Phil Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 14:55:11 +0100

57 lines

New Thread

protein into inclusion body

Re: protein into inclusion body

atul kumar <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 11:17:12 +0530

59 lines

New Thread

Protein Purification Research Associate position

Protein Purification Research Associate position

Felicetti, Brunella <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 10:01:29 +0100

348 lines

New Thread

Pymol

Pymol

protein.chemist protein.chemist <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 May 2009 15:47:05 -0400

43 lines

Re: Pymol

Warren DeLano <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 May 2009 12:58:16 -0700

60 lines

Pymol

Prathusha Dhavala <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 May 2009 22:58:25 +0300

25 lines

Re: Pymol

Charlie Bond <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 May 2009 10:12:58 +0800

60 lines

Re: Pymol

Stefan Nicolet <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 May 2009 16:50:15 +0200

99 lines

Re: Pymol

Guenter Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 May 2009 17:52:23 +0200

60 lines

New Thread

Question about stereo on LCD monitor

Question about stereo on LCD monitor

Rafal Dolot <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 09:44:31 +0200

33 lines

New Thread

Question about twinning

Question about twinning

Brett Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 16:17:28 +1000

10227 lines

Re: Question about twinning

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 09:51:54 +0100

99 lines

New Thread

question on Akta Prime

question on Akta Prime

Jacqueline Vitali <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 22:52:59 -0400

31 lines

New Thread

Re :Re: [ccp4bb] MAD phasing

Re :Re: [ccp4bb] MAD phasing

Ethayathulla Abdulsamath <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 2009 00:19:08 -0000

327 lines

Re :Re: [ccp4bb] MAD phasing

Ethayathulla Abdulsamath <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 2009 00:55:29 -0000

190 lines

Re: Re :Re: [ccp4bb] MAD phasing

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 May 2009 10:56:39 +0100

165 lines

New Thread

Recompiling LSQKAB

Recompiling LSQKAB

Edward Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 May 2009 14:01:21 -0400

31 lines

Re: Recompiling LSQKAB

Pete Meyer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 May 2009 14:34:18 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

Recompiling REFMAC with larger MAXLINK

Recompiling REFMAC with larger MAXLINK

Edward Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 May 2009 16:28:38 -0400

64 lines

Re: Recompiling REFMAC with larger MAXLINK

James Stroud <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 May 2009 18:54:10 -0700

25 lines

New Thread

reference manager software

reference manager software

David Garboczi <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 May 2009 18:49:06 -0400

18 lines

New Thread

Refining partially occupied DNA on top of itself

Refining partially occupied DNA on top of itself

Bryan Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 May 2009 06:29:40 -0700

26 lines

Re: Refining partially occupied DNA on top of itself

Ho-Leung Ng <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 May 2009 21:44:25 -0700

17 lines

New Thread

Refmac Question

Refmac Question

Leonard Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 May 2009 10:31:15 -0500

39 lines

Re: Refmac Question

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 May 2009 17:28:09 +0100

57 lines

New Thread

Refmac5 error

Refmac5 error

Jiamu Du <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 20:28:51 +0800

137 lines

Re: Refmac5 error

Keegan, RM (Ronan) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 13:44:32 +0100

396 lines

New Thread

Refolding of Denatured Protein

Refolding of Denatured Protein

Sanjiv Kumar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 2009 16:57:29 +0530

40 lines

Re: Refolding of Denatured Protein

Sanjiv Kumar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 2009 17:49:06 +0530

140 lines

Re: Refolding of Denatured Protein

David Cobessi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 2009 14:27:57 +0200

41 lines

Re: Refolding of Denatured Protein

David Cobessi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 2009 14:48:52 +0200

37 lines

Re: Refolding of Denatured Protein

Sanjiv Kumar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 2009 18:22:08 +0530

93 lines

Re: Refolding of Denatured Protein

Shao-Yang Ku <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 2009 15:10:12 +0200

46 lines

Re: Refolding of Denatured Protein

Sanjiv Kumar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 2009 19:03:20 +0530

153 lines

Re: Refolding of Denatured Protein

Ashley Buckle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 2009 23:51:03 +1000

172 lines

Re: Refolding of Denatured Protein

atul kumar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 May 2009 10:44:48 +0530

132 lines

Re: Refolding of Denatured Protein

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 6 May 2009 08:27:30 -0400

73 lines

Re: Refolding of Denatured Protein

Puey Ounjai <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 May 2009 12:34:15 -0700

219 lines

New Thread

Research Associate in Time resolved Laue x-ray protein crystallography at Imperial College London

Research Associate in Time resolved Laue x-ray protein crystallography at Imperial College London

van Thor, Jasper <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 11:48:21 +0100

57 lines

New Thread

research position at Glaxo SmithKline --North Carolina

research position at Glaxo SmithKline --North Carolina

Annie Hassell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 2009 11:43:13 -0400

118 lines

New Thread

SCALEPACK2MTZ failed

SCALEPACK2MTZ failed

Raja Dey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 2009 22:30:00 +0530

49 lines

Re: SCALEPACK2MTZ failed

Ronan Keegan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 2009 18:35:02 +0100

61 lines

Re: SCALEPACK2MTZ failed

Paul Leonard <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 2009 13:31:51 -0400

60 lines

Re: SCALEPACK2MTZ failed

Raja Dey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 2009 23:12:56 +0530

85 lines

New Thread

Science magazine jobs RSS feed not longer available?

Science magazine jobs RSS feed not longer available?

Jacob Wong <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 May 2009 17:59:36 -0400

35 lines

New Thread

Scientists position - Australian Synchrotron

Scientists position - Australian Synchrotron

Sonya Sivaraj <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 2009 13:11:01 +1000

64 lines

New Thread

Seeding

Seeding

HanJie_HCT Tai <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 May 2009 16:04:10 -0400

170 lines

New Thread

Senior Scientific Programmer Opening

Senior Scientific Programmer Opening

Kim Henrick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 08:13:09 +0100

23 lines

New Thread

Senior X-ray Crystallographer Opening - BioFocus DPI

Senior X-ray Crystallographer Opening - BioFocus DPI

Philip Leonard <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 May 2009 09:05:36 +0100

330 lines

New Thread

shelxl LS refinement problem

shelxl LS refinement problem

Matthew BOWLER <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 May 2009 12:00:49 +0200

32 lines

Re: shelxl LS refinement problem

Kay Diederichs <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 May 2009 12:26:29 +0200

158 lines

Re: shelxl LS refinement problem

George M. Sheldrick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 May 2009 12:58:45 +0200

66 lines

Re: shelxl LS refinement problem

Ian Tickle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 May 2009 12:06:28 +0100

132 lines

New Thread

shelxl LS refinement problem: summary

shelxl LS refinement problem: summary

Matthew BOWLER <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 May 2009 16:07:01 +0200

29 lines

New Thread

side chain angle differences between monomers

side chain angle differences between monomers

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 4 May 2009 16:25:19 -0300

30 lines

New Thread

Slow growing protein crystals

Slow growing protein crystals

Nicola Beresford <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 15:22:48 +0100

21 lines

New Thread

Software for RNA model building

Software for RNA model building

Rafal Dolot <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 10:05:13 +0200

36 lines

Re: Software for RNA model building

Kristof Van Hecke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 10:11:42 +0200

56 lines

Re: Software for RNA model building

James Stroud <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 01:30:55 -0700

67 lines

Re: Software for RNA model building

Fabrice Jossinet <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 18:29:44 +0100

33 lines

New Thread

Source Ta6Br12 for phasing

Source Ta6Br12 for phasing

Guenter Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 19:51:06 +0200

23 lines

Re: Source Ta6Br12 for phasing

Gabriel Birrane <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 May 2009 14:21:40 -0400

118 lines

New Thread

Subject: off topic, purification from insect media and TFF/CFF

Subject: off topic, purification from insect media and TFF/CFF

Mark Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 May 2009 00:44:37 -0400

21 lines

New Thread

suitabel buffer condition for protein

suitabel buffer condition for protein

atul kumar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 2009 11:18:03 +0530

108 lines

Re: suitabel buffer condition for protein

Mark J. van Raaij <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 2009 09:46:29 +0200

68 lines

New Thread

SUMMARY:vSystem virtual machine recommendation for crystallography?

Re: SUMMARY:vSystem virtual machine recommendation for crystallography?

Andy Torelli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 May 2009 13:37:56 -0400

70 lines

New Thread

Symposium: Light Microscopy meets Structural Biology, EMBL Heidelberg, June 22-23, 2009

Symposium: Light Microscopy meets Structural Biology, EMBL Heidelberg, June 22-23, 2009

Christoph Mueller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 May 2009 10:49:54 +0200

45 lines

New Thread

System virtual machine recommendation for crystallography?

System virtual machine recommendation for crystallography?

Andy Torelli <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 2009 11:36:26 -0400

38 lines

Re: System virtual machine recommendation for crystallography?

Roger Rowlett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 May 2009 12:13:10 -0400

76 lines

New Thread

The X6A workbench: Advanced Structural Biology Tools, is back!

The X6A workbench: Advanced Structural Biology Tools, is back!

Stojanoff, Vivian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 May 2009 17:49:25 -0400

26 lines

New Thread

Tips on fitting poorly defined loop regions

Tips on fitting poorly defined loop regions

Drew Waight <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 2009 15:45:43 +0100

38 lines

Re: Tips on fitting poorly defined loop regions

Pascal Egea <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 2009 08:42:03 -0700

56 lines

Re: Tips on fitting poorly defined loop regions

Dale Tronrud <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 2009 10:03:31 -0700

48 lines

Re: Tips on fitting poorly defined loop regions

Andrew Waight <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 2009 18:37:48 +0100

22 lines

Re: Tips on fitting poorly defined loop regions

Lester Steven Guy Carter <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 May 2009 22:42:36 -0700

51 lines

New Thread

TLSANL gives zero off-diagonal ANISOU matrix in CCP4 6.1

TLSANL gives zero off-diagonal ANISOU matrix in CCP4 6.1

Alejandro Buschiazzo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 14:26:34 -0300

50 lines

Re: TLSANL gives zero off-diagonal ANISOU matrix in CCP4 6.1

Winn, MD (Martyn) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 18:37:57 +0100

62 lines

New Thread

uniquefy and CELL dimension swap

uniquefy and CELL dimension swap

hari jayaram <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 May 2009 12:22:07 -0400

38 lines

Re: uniquefy and CELL dimension swap

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 May 2009 11:37:44 +0100

45 lines

New Thread

use of siliconized cover glass

Re: use of siliconized cover glass

Lin Chen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Apr 2009 19:27:53 -0700

93 lines

New Thread

xquartz alert

xquartz alert

Engin Ozkan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 09:25:45 -0700

17 lines

Re: xquartz alert

Phil Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 17:27:33 +0100

27 lines

Re: xquartz alert

Andreas Förster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 May 2009 18:41:58 +0100

32 lines

New Thread

[ccp4-dev]: sfall atmmap resolution

Re: [ccp4-dev]: sfall atmmap resolution

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 20:18:16 +0100

47 lines

Re: [ccp4-dev]: sfall atmmap resolution

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 20:46:24 +0100

22 lines

New Thread

[Fwd: totheboard]

[Fwd: totheboard]

Sascha M. Marek <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 13:52:27 +0200

151 lines

Re: [Fwd: totheboard]

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 13:25:50 +0100

22 lines

New Thread

[offtopic?] putting b-factors from two pdbs on the same scale and interpretation

[offtopic?] putting b-factors from two pdbs on the same scale and interpretation

Francis E Reyes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 2009 12:10:16 -0600

37 lines

Re: [offtopic?] putting b-factors from two pdbs on the same scale and interpretation

Ethan Merritt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 2009 11:44:43 -0700

55 lines

Re: [offtopic?] putting b-factors from two pdbs on the same scale and interpretation

Donnie Berkholz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 May 2009 14:14:05 -0700

72 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager