JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for FSL Archives


FSL Archives

FSL Archives


March 2009


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"Isotropic" DWI (7 messages)
#99 out of memory on tbss_non_FA (2 messages)
1 group, 3 conditions Tripled T-Test (2 messages)
1-group, 1-vs-'the others', VBM/VBD analysis (2 messages)
2ndlevel IC-map registration (6 messages)
2x4 ANOVA, 1 repeated measure (1 message)
32bit/64bit systems - difference at bedpostx results at the same dataset (2 messages)
About GM (3 messages)
Actual implementation? [Re: Q: How to de-smooth BOLD images, previously smoothed with a known kernel-width?] (9 messages)
Add Additional Confound EV(s) in Feat (3 messages)
adding a function to the process (3 messages)
An answer to the image de-smoothing Q, from Prof. Jeffrey Fessler (1 message)
anisotropic DTI data (2 messages)
apply an xfm (4 messages)
ApplyXFM and brain lesion (8 messages)
asymmetires (3 messages)
Averaged ROI (2 messages)
averaging DTI acquisitions (2 messages)
AW: [FSL] 32bit/64bit systems - difference at bedpostx results at the same dataset (1 message)
AW: [FSL] asymmetires (4 messages)
AW: [FSL] AW: [FSL] asymmetires (1 message)
AW: [FSL] AW: [FSL] Flirt question (1 message)
AW: [FSL] Flirt question (7 messages)
B0 unwarping (3 messages)
Bedpostx & SGE (1 message)
bedpostx is finished? (1 message)
Bedpostx monitor issue (FDT v2.0) (1 message)
BET problem (4 messages)
bet problems (2 messages)
Better spatial normalization of subcortial regions with FSL FIRST? (8 messages)
bptf and memory (2 messages)
building fslview for X11 on Mac (1 message)
building the Diffusion Tensor Image (4 messages)
Calculate Correlation between images from the command line? (7 messages)
Cann't register FA data through pre-computed alignments (5 messages)
capillary phantom (1 message)
capillary phantom for muscle dti (16 messages)
capillary phantom for muscle dti2 (20 messages)
capillary phantom for muscle dti_bedpost (1 message)
capillary phantom for muscle dti_dtifit (4 messages)
categorical covariate (2 messages)
Checking DTI gradient directions (2 messages)
compare models (14 messages)
Coregister repeated DTI acquisitions with FSL (3 messages)
correcting diffusivity images with different b-values (2 messages)
corrections.nii.gz (2 messages)
demean (2 messages)
Discrepancies between feat output and fslview (10 messages)
Do the two ways of coding events differ? (3 messages)
Donating scripts for rotating bvecs after ecc (12 messages)
Doubt about GM (1 message)
dti and fmri: newbie setup issues (3 messages)
eddy current correction with spiral imaging (4 messages)
EDPOSTX error (2 messages)
error in Juelich atlas region assignments (2 messages)
Error message registration 3rd level feat (2 messages)
Error of fnirt with an "inmask" (2 messages)
error reminder when do eddy current correction (3 messages)
extracting median time series for ROI (4 messages)
FA map with brain voxels of intensity 0 or >1 (6 messages)
FA range for white matter (1 message)
False Discovery Rate (2 messages)
FAST (2 messages)
FAST - Out of Memory Error (6 messages)
Fast - strange misclassification (5 messages)
fdt_paths.nii.gz (2 messages)
FEAT analyses using Freesurfer functionals (3 messages)
FEAT analysis and contrast masking (7 messages)
FEAT design and contrast masking (1 message)
Featquery - % Change (4 messages)
Featquery atlas not found (4 messages)
Featquery error (3 messages)
FILM_GLS and low variance data (5 messages)
FIRST vertex-wise (6 messages)
first_flirt error (5 messages)
flame error message (3 messages)
Flirt mat file units, origins etc (2 messages)
FLIRT on images with gaps between slices (6 messages)
Flirt question (1 message)
FLIRT question: example_func 2 standard (2 messages)
FNIRT and config file (2 messages)
FNIRT configuration for patients with subdural electrodes (5 messages)
Follow up on randomise designs &TBSS (4 messages)
From dicom to nii (12 messages)
fsl 4.0 deproject error (1 message)
FSL 4.1.2 tbss_2_reg and SGE (15 messages)
FSL 4.1.2 tbss_2_reg and SGE solution (1 message)
FSL Digest - 24 Mar 2009 to 25 Mar 2009 - Special issue (#2009-86) (2 messages)
FSL download for Ubuntu 8.10 64bit version ? (10 messages)
FSL FIRST problems in patients with dementia (1 message)
FSL VBM (1 message)
FSL VBM Question (1 message)
FSL-VBM (fslvbm_3_proc) clarification questions (1 message)
fslmaths (3 messages)
fslmaths -thrP (4 messages)
FSLOUTPUTTYPE problem v4.1.2 (2 messages)
FSLUTIL to compute the total Z of an image... (2 messages)
FSLVBM image input (1 message)
fslview (2 messages)
fslview problem (1 message)
ftoz segmentation fault (4 messages)
Fugue (2 messages)
Fwd: Job Ad (Research Associate/Senior Research Associate (fMRI Methods)) (1 message)
Fwd: [FSL] Using atlas regions as a mask (1 message)
Getting good extractions (2 messages)
GM ROIs (2 messages)
Group ICA (6 messages)
group mean when one subject had only one session (3 messages)
GROUP MELODIC (2 messages)
groups are unequal in size (2 messages)
grow virtual drive... (3 messages)
How to create design.mat and design.con files for VBM (2 messages)
How to extract FA values in a atlas space in TBSS? (3 messages)
how to smooth an image (2 messages)
Is FSL compatible with the new MAC Pro 8 core (2 messages)
Job opportunity in Neuroimaging in Hamburg (1 message)
Juelich Histological Atlas (4 messages)
Mask for the retrosplenial cortex (1 message)
match between behaivor and fMRI (3 messages)
Mean FA skeleton values (1 message)
mean_FA_skeleton values around 2000 til 8000 (6 messages)
Melodic Output - Further Group Analysis (1 message)
memory in FSL 4.1* (1 message)
mis-registration on tbss_2 (2 messages)
Mixed-effects analysis (2 messages)
MNI normalizatin of partial EPI datasets (2 messages)
modeling slope over time (2 messages)
MPRAGE dicom converted in mri_convert display awkward (9 messages)
multiplying matrix for motion correction of Merged DW repetitions (2 messages)
negative eigenvalues problem (template) (2 messages)
neuroimaging lab research assistant position (1 message)
New with FSL (15 messages)
nifit_read_buffer error (2 messages)
Obtain Average Mask using FIRST? (4 messages)
Odd results from fslmaths and fslstats (3 messages)
One more question (1 message)
One vs. Many comparison (2 messages)
Open Position for Data Analysis Research Assistant at Stanford University (1 message)
output two-sample t-test (2 messages)
Pearson r for TBSS data (2 messages)
percent signal change - outliers and thresholding (4 messages)
PhD and Post-doc Positions in Systems Neuroscience (1 message)
PhD and Post-doc Positions in Theoretical Neuroscience (1 message)
Plans for GPUs in FSL processing? (4 messages)
Possible Featquery bug (3 messages)
Post probtrackx analyses - thresholds for fdt_paths (22 messages)
Post-Doc positions for TBI (1 message)
Post-doctoral position (2 messages)
Postdoctoral Associate position in fMRI/TMS, Cardiff University, UK (1 message)
Postdoctoral Fellow at Imperial College, allied with GlaxoSmithKline Clinical Imaging Centre (1 message)
Postdoctoral Fellow Position (1 message)
Postdoctoral Fellowship at Stanford University (1 message)
POSTDOCTORAL POSITION - COGNITIVE CONTROL (1 message)
POSTDOCTORAL POSITION - IMAGING OF NEURODEGENERATION (1 message)
presentation of fdt paths (3 messages)
Preserve concentration option in FNIRT (2 messages)
prewhitened data (6 messages)
problem with fslchfiletype (2 messages)
probtrackx and thalamocortical tracts (6 messages)
probtrackx execution error (2 messages)
probtrackx for capillary phantom (1 message)
probtrackx with two waypointmasks (4 messages)
Q: How to de-smooth BOLD images, previously smoothed with a known kernel-width? (2 messages)
Q:VBM analysis (1 message)
Q:VBM randomise (2 messages)
Quadruple Paired T-Test (5 messages)
Question about FSL licensing (5 messages)
Question about second level analysis (2 messages)
Questions on cluster tool (2 messages)
randomise and voxel-dependent EVs (4 messages)
randomise regression (1 message)
randomise regression? (1 message)
randomise results meaning (2 messages)
Randomise results questions (3 messages)
randomise: modeling the mean (2 messages)
Re : [FSL] Better spatial normalization of subcortial regions with FSL FIRST? (3 messages)
Re : [FSL] Colour Bar Significance Values (3 messages)
Re : [FSL] FSL VBM (5 messages)
Re : [FSL] FSL VBM Question (3 messages)
Re : [FSL] FSL-VBM (fslvbm_3_proc) clarification questions (2 messages)
Re : [FSL] FSLVBM image input (1 message)
Re : [FSL] Mean FA skeleton values (1 message)
Re : [FSL] mis-registration on tbss_2 (1 message)
Re : [FSL] Preserve concentration option in FNIRT (1 message)
Re : [FSL] Q:VBM analysis (1 message)
Re : [FSL] randomise results meaning (1 message)
Re : [FSL] Re : [FSL] Strange t-stats in vbm analysis (1 message)
Re : [FSL] Strange t-stats in vbm analysis (2 messages)
Re : [FSL] VBM trouble: no GM_mod_merg file (7 messages)
Reconstruction DTI image (24 messages)
Reduced FA and reduced GM associated with better performance (3 messages)
registration strangeness (2 messages)
resampling data (2 messages)
Research Assistant position Children's Hospital Boston/Harvard Medical School (1 message)
ROI for TBSS using FSL4.1.2 (3 messages)
RPI vs LPI orientation (prior to fsl analyzes) (5 messages)
run time for randomise (6 messages)
S0 Image from dtifit (5 messages)
Satellite Meeting to OHBM 2009: Advances in Resting-state fMRI (1 message)
script to average dti data. (2 messages)
Scripting FSLview (3 messages)
sienax (1 message)
SIENAX error (3 messages)
Similarity measure comparing (2 messages)
Some questions about DTI analysis (3 messages)
Specifying relative filenames (2 messages)
Stats within a number of clusters (2 messages)
Stimulus Duration and PP height (5 messages)
Strange t-stats in vbm analysis (1 message)
TBSS & "small volume correction" (2 messages)
TBSS and 0 intensities in FA maps. (7 messages)
tbss and multiple regression (4 messages)
TBSS huge data processing problem (1 message)
TBSS randomise F-test (3 messages)
tbss3_postreg (1 message)
tbss_2_reg problems (fsl 4.1.0) (3 messages)
Tbss_non_FA across different TBSS versions (2 messages)
tbss_non_FA pipeline (3 messages)
Template (7 messages)
TFCE in fMRI (5 messages)
Thalamic segmentation article (1 message)
Transformation question (3 messages)
Two DTI series from 1 subject form different scanners (2 messages)
two group FLAME, overall effect of both groups combined (4 messages)
two-sample t-test between a patient FDG-PET image and a group of FDG-PET image of controls ?... (2 messages)
two-sample t-test between a patient PET image and a group of PET image of controls ?... version 2 of the question... (1 message)
Using anisotropy to constain tracking in probtrackx (2 messages)
Using atlas regions as a mask (18 messages)
Using FreeSurfer results as ROIs in TBSS (4 messages)
VBM trouble: no GM_mod_merg file (1 message)
Vertex and Covariate analysis with first_utils (7 messages)
voxel coordinate conversion to MNI doesn't match FSLview display (3 messages)
Waytotal (2 messages)
white FA maps (12 messages)
white matter mask from mean FA image? (2 messages)
Worm from the 3rd archieve of "FSL Practicals" (2 messages)
ztop / ptoz and thresholding (4 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

FSL Home

FSL Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"Isotropic" DWI

"Isotropic" DWI

Brittany Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 19:06:46 +0000

16 lines

Re: "Isotropic" DWI

John Colby <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 20:44:48 +0000

34 lines

Re: "Isotropic" DWI

Brittany Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 15:45:27 +0000

22 lines

Re: "Isotropic" DWI

David Gutman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 15:58:43 +0000

29 lines

Re: "Isotropic" DWI

Brittany Copp <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 16:24:42 +0000

19 lines

Re: "Isotropic" DWI

MCLAREN, Donald <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 15:41:32 -0700

88 lines

Re: "Isotropic" DWI

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 16:48:41 -0600

296 lines

New Thread

#99 out of memory on tbss_non_FA

#99 out of memory on tbss_non_FA

Geoff Kerchner <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Mar 2009 16:42:21 +0100

30 lines

Re: #99 out of memory on tbss_non_FA

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Mar 2009 17:25:15 +0100

56 lines

New Thread

1 group, 3 conditions Tripled T-Test

1 group, 3 conditions Tripled T-Test

Kevin Denny <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:54:27 +0000

56 lines

Re: 1 group, 3 conditions Tripled T-Test

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:29:14 +0000

83 lines

New Thread

1-group, 1-vs-'the others', VBM/VBD analysis

1-group, 1-vs-'the others', VBM/VBD analysis

Silviu Podariu <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:42:52 +0000

27 lines

Re: 1-group, 1-vs-'the others', VBM/VBD analysis

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:09:16 -0500

47 lines

New Thread

2ndlevel IC-map registration

2ndlevel IC-map registration

Andreas Pedroni <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:28:37 +0100

27 lines

Re: 2ndlevel IC-map registration

chun meng <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:49:34 +0800

103 lines

Re: 2ndlevel IC-map registration

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:49:02 +0000

80 lines

Re: 2ndlevel IC-map registration

Carmen Ghisleni <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:59:19 +0000

413 lines

Re: 2ndlevel IC-map registration

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 21:44:44 +0000

107 lines

Re: 2ndlevel IC-map registration

Carmen Ghisleni <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:30:12 +0000

191 lines

New Thread

2x4 ANOVA, 1 repeated measure

2x4 ANOVA, 1 repeated measure

Kern, Kyle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:34:43 -0700

377 lines

New Thread

32bit/64bit systems - difference at bedpostx results at the same dataset

32bit/64bit systems - difference at bedpostx results at the same dataset

"Lützkendorf, Ralf" <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 12:47:25 +0100

47 lines

Re: 32bit/64bit systems - difference at bedpostx results at the same dataset

Jens Sommer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 13:29:18 +0100

58 lines

New Thread

About GM

About GM

Kelly Silva <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:05:29 +0100

15 lines

Re: About GM

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:49:51 +0100

34 lines

Re: About GM

Kelly Atalaia Silva <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 11:19:24 -0300

30 lines

New Thread

Actual implementation? [Re: Q: How to de-smooth BOLD images, previously smoothed with a known kernel-width?]

Actual implementation? [Re: Q: How to de-smooth BOLD images, previously smoothed with a known kernel-width?]

Rajeev Raizada <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 21:40:01 +0000

55 lines

Re: Actual implementation? [Re: Q: How to de-smooth BOLD images, previously smoothed with a known kernel-width?]

Bruce Fischl <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 09:43:46 -0500

65 lines

Re: Actual implementation? [Re: Q: How to de-smooth BOLD images, previously smoothed with a known kernel-width?]

Kochunov, Peter <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 09:00:50 -0600

88 lines

Re: Actual implementation? [Re: Q: How to de-smooth BOLD images, previously smoothed with a known kernel-width?]

Bruce Fischl <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 11:20:31 -0500

98 lines

Re: Actual implementation? [Re: Q: How to de-smooth BOLD images, previously smoothed with a known kernel-width?]

Gael Varoquaux <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 17:26:57 +0100

45 lines

Re: Actual implementation? [Re: Q: How to de-smooth BOLD images, previously smoothed with a known kernel-width?]

Kochunov, Peter <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 10:43:37 -0600

134 lines

Re: Actual implementation? [Re: Q: How to de-smooth BOLD images, previously smoothed with a known kernel-width?]

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 18:08:49 +0000

188 lines

Re: Actual implementation? [Re: Q: How to de-smooth BOLD images, previously smoothed with a known kernel-width?]

Souheil Inati <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 14:43:49 -0500

304 lines

Re: Actual implementation? [Re: Q: How to de-smooth BOLD images, previously smoothed with a known kernel-width?]

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 08:39:38 +0000

374 lines

New Thread

Add Additional Confound EV(s) in Feat

Add Additional Confound EV(s) in Feat

Jennifer Bramen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 00:23:52 +0000

22 lines

Re: Add Additional Confound EV(s) in Feat

Govinda Poudel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 16:46:34 +1300

66 lines

Re: Add Additional Confound EV(s) in Feat

wolf zinke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 13:36:36 +0100

242 lines

New Thread

adding a function to the process

adding a function to the process

Asaf Stahl <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:50:03 +0000

33 lines

Re: adding a function to the process

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:40:29 -0500

45 lines

Re: adding a function to the process

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 09:09:05 +0000

61 lines

New Thread

An answer to the image de-smoothing Q, from Prof. Jeffrey Fessler

An answer to the image de-smoothing Q, from Prof. Jeffrey Fessler

Rajeev Raizada <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 22:49:13 +0000

47 lines

New Thread

anisotropic DTI data

anisotropic DTI data

Jenifer Juranek <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:44:35 +0000

28 lines

Re: anisotropic DTI data

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:20:28 -0500

52 lines

New Thread

apply an xfm

apply an xfm

Satrajit Ghosh <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:34:51 -0400

31 lines

Re: apply an xfm

Eugene Duff <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:54:01 +0000

111 lines

Re: apply an xfm

Satrajit Ghosh <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:14:58 -0400

94 lines

Re: apply an xfm

Eugene Duff <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 11:00:35 +0000

254 lines

New Thread

ApplyXFM and brain lesion

ApplyXFM and brain lesion

rajani sebastian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:18:34 -0500

64 lines

Re: ApplyXFM and brain lesion

Dave Flitney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 08:53:42 +0000

126 lines

Re: ApplyXFM and brain lesion

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:00:50 +0000

59 lines

Re: ApplyXFM and brain lesion

rajani sebastian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 08:34:45 -0500

135 lines

Re: ApplyXFM and brain lesion

rajani sebastian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:37:57 -0500

165 lines

Re: ApplyXFM and brain lesion

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:51:31 +0000

102 lines

Re: ApplyXFM and brain lesion

rajani sebastian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:37:10 -0500

267 lines

Re: ApplyXFM and brain lesion

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:43:16 +0000

133 lines

New Thread

asymmetires

asymmetires

cathyliu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 22:27:52 +0800

135 lines

Re: asymmetires

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:14:22 -0500

500 lines

Re: asymmetires

cathyliu <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:21:54 +0800

392 lines

New Thread

Averaged ROI

Averaged ROI

Yunjie Tong <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:50:12 -0400

20 lines

Re: Averaged ROI

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 23:27:06 +0000

39 lines

New Thread

averaging DTI acquisitions

averaging DTI acquisitions

Rajeet Saluja <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:50:32 +0100

49 lines

Re: averaging DTI acquisitions

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:51:25 -0500

69 lines

New Thread

AW: [FSL] 32bit/64bit systems - difference at bedpostx results at the same dataset

AW: [FSL] 32bit/64bit systems - difference at bedpostx results at the same dataset

"Lützkendorf, Ralf" <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 14:54:37 +0100

79 lines

New Thread

AW: [FSL] asymmetires

AW: [FSL] asymmetires

Andreas Bartsch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:55:32 +0200

166 lines

Re: AW: [FSL] asymmetires

cathyliu <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:24:56 +0800

513 lines

Re: AW: [FSL] asymmetires

Tim Behrens <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:32:22 +0100

91 lines

Re: AW: [FSL] asymmetires

cathyliu <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:43:40 +0800

152 lines

New Thread

AW: [FSL] AW: [FSL] asymmetires

AW: [FSL] AW: [FSL] asymmetires

Andreas Bartsch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:05:09 +0200

251 lines

New Thread

AW: [FSL] AW: [FSL] Flirt question

AW: [FSL] AW: [FSL] Flirt question

Andreas Bartsch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:35:02 +0100

152 lines

New Thread

AW: [FSL] Flirt question

AW: [FSL] Flirt question

Andreas Bartsch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 19:46:21 +0100

52 lines

Re: AW: [FSL] Flirt question

Buyean Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 18:09:06 -0500

180 lines

Re: AW: [FSL] Flirt question

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 04:18:46 -0800

123 lines

Re: AW: [FSL] Flirt question

Buyean Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 12:51:31 -0500

387 lines

Re: AW: [FSL] Flirt question

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 08:50:46 +0000

349 lines

Re: AW: [FSL] Flirt question

Buyean Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 17:45:30 -0500

1451 lines

Re: AW: [FSL] Flirt question

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 08:31:01 +0000

459 lines

New Thread

B0 unwarping

B0 unwarping

Hallvard Røe Evensmoen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 07:16:37 +0000

18 lines

Re: B0 unwarping

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 08:54:15 +0000

40 lines

Re: B0 unwarping

Hallvard Røe Evensmoen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 12:31:29 +0100

49 lines

New Thread

Bedpostx & SGE

Re: Bedpostx & SGE

Wayne Su <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:21:59 -0700

54 lines

New Thread

bedpostx is finished?

bedpostx is finished?

Drew <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:28:35 +0000

33 lines

New Thread

Bedpostx monitor issue (FDT v2.0)

Bedpostx monitor issue (FDT v2.0)

Yoshiko Yamada <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:06:43 +0100

43 lines

New Thread

BET problem

BET problem

Rolf Heckemann <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:24:53 +0000

53 lines

Re: BET problem

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:19:07 +0000

53 lines

Re: BET problem

Rolf Heckemann <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:47:03 +0000

102 lines

Re: BET problem

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:50:21 +0000

104 lines

New Thread

bet problems

bet problems

Michael Scheel <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Mar 2009 19:57:51 -0700

23 lines

Re: bet problems

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 09:02:37 -0500

46 lines

New Thread

Better spatial normalization of subcortial regions with FSL FIRST?

Better spatial normalization of subcortial regions with FSL FIRST?

Buyean Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:35:43 -0400

56 lines

Better spatial normalization of subcortial regions with FSL FIRST?

Buyean Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:52:08 -0400

450 lines

Re: Better spatial normalization of subcortial regions with FSL FIRST?

Brian Patenaude <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 20:48:24 -0000

270 lines

Re: Better spatial normalization of subcortial regions with FSL FIRST?

Brian Patenaude <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 20:48:41 -0000

270 lines

Re: Better spatial normalization of subcortial regions with FSL FIRST?

Buyean Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 17:11:24 -0400

573 lines

Re: Better spatial normalization of subcortial regions with FSL FIRST?

Buyean Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 17:15:40 -0400

1175 lines

Re: Better spatial normalization of subcortial regions with FSL FIRST?

Brian Patenaude <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 21:41:55 -0000

630 lines

Re: Better spatial normalization of subcortial regions with FSL FIRST?

Buyean Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 17:46:20 -0400

1299 lines

New Thread

bptf and memory

bptf and memory

Alex Fornito <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:36:27 +0000

32 lines

Re: bptf and memory

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Mar 2009 06:13:35 +0000

61 lines

New Thread

building fslview for X11 on Mac

building fslview for X11 on Mac

Robert Terwilliger <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:33:25 -0400

39 lines

New Thread

building the Diffusion Tensor Image

building the Diffusion Tensor Image

Fabio Meneghini <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 01:27:29 +0100

23 lines

Re: building the Diffusion Tensor Image

Dianne Patterson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 18:35:54 -0700

75 lines

Re: building the Diffusion Tensor Image

Fabio Meneghini <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Mar 2009 10:52:01 +0100

20 lines

Re: building the Diffusion Tensor Image

Dianne Patterson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Mar 2009 14:19:08 -0700

85 lines

New Thread

Calculate Correlation between images from the command line?

Calculate Correlation between images from the command line?

Ariana Anderson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 03:59:05 +0000

19 lines

Re: Calculate Correlation between images from the command line?

David V. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 00:10:58 -0400

39 lines

Re: Calculate Correlation between images from the command line?

Scott Kolbe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:58:00 +1100

40 lines

Re: Calculate Correlation between images from the command line?

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 08:57:17 +0000

123 lines

Re: Calculate Correlation between images from the command line?

Ariana Anderson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:31:10 +0000

25 lines

Re: Calculate Correlation between images from the command line?

Daniel Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:34:58 -0400

70 lines

Re: Calculate Correlation between images from the command line?

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 06:51:25 +0000

51 lines

New Thread

Cann't register FA data through pre-computed alignments

Cann't register FA data through pre-computed alignments

Yapeng WANG <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 05:19:32 +0000

28 lines

Re: Cann't register FA data through pre-computed alignments

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 07:02:33 +0000

53 lines

Re: Cann't register FA data through pre-computed alignments

Yapeng WANG <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:56:50 -0700

64 lines

Re: Cann't register FA data through pre-computed alignments

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:03:40 -0700

105 lines

Re: Cann't register FA data through pre-computed alignments

Yapeng WANG <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:38:39 -0700

118 lines

New Thread

capillary phantom

capillary phantom

Mi Jung Kim <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:36:32 +0000

99 lines

New Thread

capillary phantom for muscle dti

capillary phantom for muscle dti

Mi Jung Kim <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 23:42:38 +0000

30 lines

Re: capillary phantom for muscle dti

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 20:04:27 -0500

49 lines

Re: capillary phantom for muscle dti

Mi Jung Kim <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 19:45:25 -0700

120 lines

Re: capillary phantom for muscle dti

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 21:54:42 -0500

310 lines

Re: capillary phantom for muscle dti

Mi Jung Kim <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 21:30:45 -0700

263 lines

Re: capillary phantom for muscle dti

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:05:59 -0500

526 lines

Re: capillary phantom for muscle dti

Mi Jung Kim <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 07:40:14 -0700

447 lines

Re: capillary phantom for muscle dti

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:50:43 +0000

405 lines

Re: capillary phantom for muscle dti

Mi Jung Kim <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 07:54:30 -0700

522 lines

Re: capillary phantom for muscle dti

Mi Jung Kim <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 07:59:43 -0700

465 lines

Re: capillary phantom for muscle dti

Mareike Menz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:14:07 +0100

124 lines

Re: capillary phantom for muscle dti

Mareike Menz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:21:09 +0100

123 lines

Re: capillary phantom for muscle dti

Mi Jung Kim <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:38:01 -0700

576 lines

Re: capillary phantom for muscle dti

Mareike Menz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:52:31 +0100

186 lines

Re: capillary phantom for muscle dti

Mi Jung Kim <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:24:10 -0700

815 lines

Re: capillary phantom for muscle dti

Mi Jung Kim <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:14:47 -0700

788 lines

New Thread

capillary phantom for muscle dti2

capillary phantom for muscle dti2

Mi Jung Kim <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:29:16 +0000

24 lines

Re: capillary phantom for muscle dti2

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:19:02 +0000

41 lines

Re: capillary phantom for muscle dti2

Mi Jung Kim <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:00:02 -0700

105 lines

Re: capillary phantom for muscle dti2

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 08:54:27 +0000

163 lines

Re: capillary phantom for muscle dti2

Mi Jung Kim <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 07:49:31 -0700

155 lines

Re: capillary phantom for muscle dti2

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:01:16 +0000

94 lines

Re: capillary phantom for muscle dti2

Mi Jung Kim <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 08:18:42 -0700

249 lines

Re: capillary phantom for muscle dti2

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:22:13 +0000

273 lines

Re: capillary phantom for muscle dti2

Mareike Menz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:25:32 +0100

84 lines

Re: capillary phantom for muscle dti2

Mi Jung Kim <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 08:40:37 -0700

287 lines

Re: capillary phantom for muscle dti2

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:45:56 +0000

354 lines

Re: capillary phantom for muscle dti2

Mi Jung Kim <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 08:52:16 -0700

350 lines

Re: capillary phantom for muscle dti2

Mareike Menz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:59:09 +0100

56 lines

Re: capillary phantom for muscle dti2

Mi Jung Kim <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:02:26 -0700

399 lines

Re: capillary phantom for muscle dti2

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:18:46 -0500

1149 lines

Re: capillary phantom for muscle dti2

Mi Jung Kim <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:26:25 -0700

993 lines

Re: capillary phantom for muscle dti2

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:12:46 -0500

1087 lines

Re: capillary phantom for muscle dti2

Mi Jung Kim <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:33:42 -0700

933 lines

Re: capillary phantom for muscle dti2

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:58:30 +0000

276 lines

Re: capillary phantom for muscle dti2

Mi Jung Kim <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:16:54 -0700

584 lines

New Thread

capillary phantom for muscle dti_bedpost

capillary phantom for muscle dti_bedpost

Mi Jung Kim <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 23:41:30 +0000

20 lines

New Thread

capillary phantom for muscle dti_dtifit

capillary phantom for muscle dti_dtifit

Mi Jung Kim <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:32:27 +0000

60 lines

Re: capillary phantom for muscle dti_dtifit

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 00:39:17 +0100

147 lines

Re: capillary phantom for muscle dti_dtifit

Mi Jung Kim <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:58:53 -0700

181 lines

Re: capillary phantom for muscle dti_dtifit

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 01:29:20 +0100

234 lines

New Thread

categorical covariate

categorical covariate

Christopher Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:14:02 +0000

21 lines

Re: categorical covariate

Jeanette Mumford <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:25:19 -0700

70 lines

New Thread

Checking DTI gradient directions

Checking DTI gradient directions

Shantanu Majumdar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 05:15:55 +0100

36 lines

Re: Checking DTI gradient directions

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 05:29:40 +0100

59 lines

New Thread

compare models

compare models

Vishwadeep Ahluwalia <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 20:41:10 +0000

42 lines

Re: compare models

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 07:37:13 +0000

80 lines

Re: compare models

Vishwadeep Ahluwalia <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 15:27:13 +0000

26 lines

Re: compare models

Vishwadeep Ahluwalia <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 15:30:16 +0000

26 lines

Re: compare models

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:26:45 +0000

50 lines

Re: compare models

Todd Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:45:04 -0400

72 lines

Re: compare models

Eugene Duff <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:15:30 +0000

194 lines

Re: compare models

Eugene Duff <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:17:31 +0000

194 lines

Re: compare models

Vince Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:51:08 -0600

265 lines

Re: compare models

Todd Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:23:17 -0400

149 lines

Re: compare models

Vishwadeep Ahluwalia <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:09:34 +0000

51 lines

Re: compare models

Eugene Duff <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:09:22 +0000

376 lines

Re: compare models

Jason Steffener <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 20:38:47 -0400

406 lines

Re: compare models

Eugene Duff <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 08:34:49 +0000

449 lines

New Thread

Coregister repeated DTI acquisitions with FSL

Coregister repeated DTI acquisitions with FSL

Jürgen Hänggi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:22:50 +0100

45 lines

Re: Coregister repeated DTI acquisitions with FSL

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:33:07 +0000

77 lines

Re: Coregister repeated DTI acquisitions with FSL

Jürgen Hänggi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:00:21 +0100

108 lines

New Thread

correcting diffusivity images with different b-values

correcting diffusivity images with different b-values

Scott Kolbe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:01:05 +1100

645 lines

Re: correcting diffusivity images with different b-values

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:27:42 +0000

87 lines

New Thread

corrections.nii.gz

corrections.nii.gz

Gui Xue <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 20:20:23 -0800

27 lines

Re: corrections.nii.gz

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:11:50 +0000

36 lines

New Thread

demean

demean

shih-Wei Wu <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 02:14:11 +0000

25 lines

Re: demean

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 07:13:41 +0000

50 lines

New Thread

Discrepancies between feat output and fslview

Discrepancies between feat output and fslview

Lin Nga <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 21:38:13 +0000

23 lines

Re: Discrepancies between feat output and fslview

Lin Nga <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 22:47:31 +0000

38 lines

Re: Discrepancies between feat output and fslview

Nestor, Liam (Contractor) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 14:49:12 -0800

76 lines

Re: Discrepancies between feat output and fslview

Lin Nga <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 00:13:36 +0000

107 lines

Re: Discrepancies between feat output and fslview

Nestor, Liam (Contractor) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 16:40:34 -0800

141 lines

Re: Discrepancies between feat output and fslview

Lin Nga <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 00:57:21 +0000

182 lines

Re: Discrepancies between feat output and fslview

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 05:30:20 +0000

210 lines

Re: Discrepancies between feat output and fslview

Lin Nga <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 18:44:28 +0000

226 lines

Re: Discrepancies between feat output and fslview

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 07:39:34 +0000

252 lines

Re: Discrepancies between feat output and fslview

Lin Nga <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 17:09:07 +0000

71 lines

New Thread

Do the two ways of coding events differ?

Do the two ways of coding events differ?

Shan Luo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 21:20:56 +0000

30 lines

Re: Do the two ways of coding events differ?

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 07:58:30 +0000

56 lines

Re: Do the two ways of coding events differ?

Shan(Hannah) Luo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 09:41:44 -0800

68 lines

New Thread

Donating scripts for rotating bvecs after ecc

Donating scripts for rotating bvecs after ecc

Martin Kavec <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:40:53 +0100

86 lines

Re: Donating scripts for rotating bvecs after ecc

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:43:40 -0500

71 lines

Re: Donating scripts for rotating bvecs after ecc

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 10:56:46 +0000

89 lines

Re: Donating scripts for rotating bvecs after ecc

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:46:38 -0500

338 lines

Re: Donating scripts for rotating bvecs after ecc

Martin Kavec <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 09:42:27 +0200

125 lines

Re: Donating scripts for rotating bvecs after ecc

Pablo Velasco <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:57:00 +0100

54 lines

Re: Donating scripts for rotating bvecs after ecc

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:01:49 -0500

68 lines

Re: Donating scripts for rotating bvecs after ecc

Pablo Velasco <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:02:33 +0100

71 lines

Re: Donating scripts for rotating bvecs after ecc

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:45:28 -0500

85 lines

Re: Donating scripts for rotating bvecs after ecc

Pablo Velasco <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:18:10 +0100

123 lines

Re: Donating scripts for rotating bvecs after ecc

Martin Kavec <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 22:04:44 +0200

36 lines

Re: Donating scripts for rotating bvecs after ecc

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:11:12 -0500

121 lines

New Thread

Doubt about GM

Doubt about GM

Kelly Atalaia Silva <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 07:16:14 -0300

28 lines

New Thread

dti and fmri: newbie setup issues

dti and fmri: newbie setup issues

Dianne Patterson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 18:26:17 -0700

62 lines

Re: dti and fmri: newbie setup issues

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 20:08:07 -0600

264 lines

Re: dti and fmri: newbie setup issues

Dianne Patterson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 19:37:57 -0700

221 lines

New Thread

eddy current correction with spiral imaging

Re: eddy current correction with spiral imaging

Mazerolle, Erin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 16:53:10 -0400

69 lines

Re: eddy current correction with spiral imaging

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:28:10 +0000

96 lines

Re: eddy current correction with spiral imaging

Mazerolle, Erin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 07:17:33 -0400

103 lines

Re: eddy current correction with spiral imaging

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:21:19 +0100

156 lines

New Thread

EDPOSTX error

EDPOSTX error

Alexander Lebedev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:00:22 +0400

25 lines

Re: EDPOSTX error

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:51:47 +0200

79 lines

New Thread

error in Juelich atlas region assignments

error in Juelich atlas region assignments

Dost Ongur <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:32:35 +0000

27 lines

Re: error in Juelich atlas region assignments

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 09:33:38 +0000

52 lines

New Thread

Error message registration 3rd level feat

Error message registration 3rd level feat

Grete Kjelvik <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:41:33 +0100

171 lines

Re: Error message registration 3rd level feat

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 05:25:06 +0100

48 lines

New Thread

Error of fnirt with an "inmask"

Error of fnirt with an "inmask"

Wang, Ling <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:58:11 +0100

87 lines

Re: Error of fnirt with an "inmask"

Jesper Andersson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:54:07 +0000

124 lines

New Thread

error reminder when do eddy current correction

error reminder when do eddy current correction

Yapeng WANG <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:43:48 +0000

44 lines

Re: error reminder when do eddy current correction

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 23:26:08 +0000

63 lines

Re: error reminder when do eddy current correction

Yapeng WANG <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:05:54 -0700

75 lines

New Thread

extracting median time series for ROI

extracting median time series for ROI

Jen Labus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:56:46 +0100

24 lines

Re: extracting median time series for ROI

Yi-Shin Sheu <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:19:32 -0500

76 lines

Re: extracting median time series for ROI

Michael T Rubens <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:48:46 -0700

112 lines

Re: extracting median time series for ROI

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 05:04:14 +0100

45 lines

New Thread

FA map with brain voxels of intensity 0 or >1

FA map with brain voxels of intensity 0 or >1

Siew-Min Gan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Mar 2009 02:11:41 +1100

46 lines

Re: FA map with brain voxels of intensity 0 or >1

Jesper Andersson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 15:41:20 +0000

111 lines

Re: FA map with brain voxels of intensity 0 or >1

Siew-Min Gan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Mar 2009 03:42:57 +1100

134 lines

Re: FA map with brain voxels of intensity 0 or >1

Siew-Min Gan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Mar 2009 03:48:33 +1100

141 lines

Re: FA map with brain voxels of intensity 0 or >1

Jesper Andersson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:01:34 +0000

453 lines

Re: FA map with brain voxels of intensity 0 or >1

Siew-Min Gan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Mar 2009 20:46:07 +1100

174 lines

New Thread

FA range for white matter

FA range for white matter

Lindgren, Kristen, Ann <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:10:13 -0400

13 lines

New Thread

False Discovery Rate

False Discovery Rate

MCLAREN, Donald <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:28:53 -0500

83 lines

Re: False Discovery Rate

Michael T Rubens <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:14:08 -0700

174 lines

New Thread

FAST

FAST

MCLAREN, Donald <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:21:39 -0500

58 lines

Re: FAST

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:15:32 +0100

43 lines

New Thread

FAST - Out of Memory Error

FAST - Out of Memory Error

Jayanth Kolar <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:34:43 +0000

53 lines

Re: FAST - Out of Memory Error

Rolf Heckemann <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:37:35 +0000

71 lines

Re: FAST - Out of Memory Error

Jayanth Kolar <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 19:04:44 +0000

143 lines

Re: FAST - Out of Memory Error

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:47:48 -0500

452 lines

Re: FAST - Out of Memory Error

Jayanth Kolar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:55:38 -0500

394 lines

Re: FAST - Out of Memory Error

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:38:08 -0500

650 lines

New Thread

Fast - strange misclassification

Fast - strange misclassification

Wolfgang Weber-Fahr <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:41:49 +0100

47 lines

Re: Fast - strange misclassification

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 08:13:46 +0000

72 lines

Re: Fast - strange misclassification

Wolfgang Weber-Fahr <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:37:00 +0200

103 lines

Re: Fast - strange misclassification

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 09:12:29 +0100

116 lines

Re: Fast - strange misclassification

Wolfgang Weber-Fahr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:10:22 +0200

150 lines

New Thread

fdt_paths.nii.gz

fdt_paths.nii.gz

Mi Jung Kim <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:24:02 +0000

33 lines

Re: fdt_paths.nii.gz

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:52:46 -0500

45 lines

New Thread

FEAT analyses using Freesurfer functionals

FEAT analyses using Freesurfer functionals

Susan McLaughlin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:33:29 +0000

54 lines

Re: FEAT analyses using Freesurfer functionals

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 07:28:00 +0000

94 lines

Re: FEAT analyses using Freesurfer functionals

Susan Alice McLaughlin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:14:51 -0700

116 lines

New Thread

FEAT analysis and contrast masking

FEAT analysis and contrast masking

Rebecca <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 09:54:19 +0000

68 lines

Re: FEAT analysis and contrast masking

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:11:09 +0000

91 lines

Re: FEAT analysis and contrast masking

Rebecca Leigh <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:30:00 +0000

18 lines

Re: FEAT analysis and contrast masking

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 06:37:15 +0000

50 lines

Re: FEAT analysis and contrast masking

Rebecca Leigh <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:12:21 +0000

92 lines

Re: FEAT analysis and contrast masking

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Mar 2009 06:17:45 +0000

122 lines

Re: FEAT analysis and contrast masking

Rebecca Leigh <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:25:12 -0700

221 lines

New Thread

FEAT design and contrast masking

FEAT design and contrast masking

Rebecca Leigh <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 02:50:09 -0700

138 lines

New Thread

Featquery - % Change

Featquery - % Change

Daniel Shaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:01:49 +0000

31 lines

Re: Featquery - % Change

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 06:52:40 +0000

54 lines

Re: Featquery - % Change

Daniel Shaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:36:53 +0000

226 lines

Re: Featquery - % Change

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:02:51 +0000

114 lines

New Thread

Featquery atlas not found

Featquery atlas not found

Michael Scheel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 17:39:02 -0700

18 lines

Re: Featquery atlas not found

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:12:00 +0000

37 lines

Re: Featquery atlas not found

Michael Scheel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:03:17 -0700

42 lines

Re: Featquery atlas not found

Michael Scheel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:01:44 +0000

49 lines

New Thread

Featquery error

Featquery error

Jonathan Hakun <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:58:29 +0000

33 lines

Re: Featquery error

Hakun_J <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:34:11 -0400

76 lines

Re: Featquery error

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 06:56:45 +0000

55 lines

New Thread

FILM_GLS and low variance data

FILM_GLS and low variance data

Clare Kelly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:37:05 -0400

481 lines

Re: FILM_GLS and low variance data

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:01:36 +0000

164 lines

Re: FILM_GLS and low variance data

Clare Kelly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:24:00 -0400

176 lines

Re: FILM_GLS and low variance data

Clare Kelly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:29:06 -0400

178 lines

Re: FILM_GLS and low variance data

Clare Kelly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:21:24 +0000

16 lines

New Thread

FIRST vertex-wise

FIRST vertex-wise

j janssen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:18:42 +0100

71 lines

Re: FIRST vertex-wise

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:12:57 +0000

78 lines

Re: FIRST vertex-wise

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:49:33 +0000

94 lines

Re: FIRST vertex-wise

j janssen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:19:43 +0100

208 lines

Re: FIRST vertex-wise

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:25:25 +0000

134 lines

Re: FIRST vertex-wise

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:07:56 +0000

153 lines

New Thread

first_flirt error

first_flirt error

Buyean Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 01:08:23 -0500

158 lines

Re: first_flirt error

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:11:22 +0000

122 lines

Re: first_flirt error

Buyean Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 22:58:27 -0500

500 lines

Re: first_flirt error

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 08:38:41 +0000

235 lines

Re: first_flirt error

Buyean Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 17:18:11 -0500

734 lines

New Thread

flame error message

flame error message

Arun Bokde <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 12:28:47 +0000

76 lines

Re: flame error message

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 12:44:53 +0000

96 lines

Re: flame error message

Arun Bokde <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 12:57:36 +0000

17 lines

New Thread

Flirt mat file units, origins etc

Flirt mat file units, origins etc

Luke Bloy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:10:03 +0000

38 lines

Re: Flirt mat file units, origins etc

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 22:51:13 +0000

75 lines

New Thread

FLIRT on images with gaps between slices

FLIRT on images with gaps between slices

Rajagopalan, Venkateswaran <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:15:31 -0400

137 lines

Re: FLIRT on images with gaps between slices

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:51:57 +0000

81 lines

Re: FLIRT on images with gaps between slices

Rajagopalan, Venkateswaran <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 09:18:32 -0400

127 lines

Re: FLIRT on images with gaps between slices

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:49:24 +0000

177 lines

Re: FLIRT on images with gaps between slices

Rajagopalan, Venkateswaran <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:13:53 -0400

284 lines

Re: FLIRT on images with gaps between slices

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 23:06:45 +0000

57 lines

New Thread

Flirt question

Flirt question

Buyean Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 11:20:49 -0500

48 lines

New Thread

FLIRT question: example_func 2 standard

FLIRT question: example_func 2 standard

shih-Wei Wu <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:36:22 +0000

574 lines

Re: FLIRT question: example_func 2 standard

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:27:57 +0000

62 lines

New Thread

FNIRT and config file

FNIRT and config file

kl chen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:28:56 +0000

24 lines

Re: FNIRT and config file

Jesper Andersson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:38:37 -0000

41 lines

New Thread

FNIRT configuration for patients with subdural electrodes

FNIRT configuration for patients with subdural electrodes

Riki Matsumoto <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 15:28:27 +0900

677 lines

Re: FNIRT configuration for patients with subdural electrodes

Jesper Andersson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 12:52:47 +0000

97 lines

Re: FNIRT configuration for patients with subdural electrodes

Riki Matsumoto <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Mar 2009 21:43:29 +0900

94 lines

Re: FNIRT configuration for patients with subdural electrodes

Jesper Andersson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Mar 2009 18:43:51 -0000

96 lines

Re: FNIRT configuration for patients with subdural electrodes

Riki Matsumoto <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 01:29:56 +0900

126 lines

New Thread

Follow up on randomise designs &TBSS

Follow up on randomise designs &TBSS

Agnieszka Burzynska <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 16:17:25 +0100

281 lines

Re: Follow up on randomise designs &TBSS

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Mar 2009 07:59:24 +0100

167 lines

Re: Follow up on randomise designs &TBSS

Agnieszka Burzynska <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:37:04 +0100

195 lines

Re: Follow up on randomise designs &TBSS

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:26:42 +0100

212 lines

New Thread

From dicom to nii

From dicom to nii

Hallvard Røe Evensmoen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:05:37 +0000

23 lines

Re: From dicom to nii

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:09:27 +0000

39 lines

Re: From dicom to nii

Hallvard Røe Evensmoen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 11:20:10 +0100

50 lines

Re: From dicom to nii

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:06:05 +0000

81 lines

Re: From dicom to nii

Auer, Tibor MD. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:10:21 +0100

104 lines

Re: From dicom to nii

Hallvard Røe Evensmoen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:15:07 +0100

118 lines

Re: From dicom to nii

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:21:15 +0000

133 lines

Re: From dicom to nii

Chun Meng <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:56:32 +0800

83 lines

Re: From dicom to nii

Simon Robinson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:09:10 +0000

156 lines

Re: From dicom to nii

Chun Meng <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:50:47 +0800

311 lines

Re: From dicom to nii

Xun Liu <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:31:38 +0000

60 lines

Re: From dicom to nii

Chun Meng <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:17:05 +0800

147 lines

New Thread

fsl 4.0 deproject error

Re: fsl 4.0 deproject error

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:08:41 +0000

48 lines

New Thread

FSL 4.1.2 tbss_2_reg and SGE

FSL 4.1.2 tbss_2_reg and SGE

Mahinda Yogarajah <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 18:19:12 +0000

39 lines

Re: FSL 4.1.2 tbss_2_reg and SGE

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 18:47:41 +0000

58 lines

Re: FSL 4.1.2 tbss_2_reg and SGE

Mahinda Yogarajah <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:48:58 +0000

23 lines

Re: FSL 4.1.2 tbss_2_reg and SGE

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 22:13:58 +0000

44 lines

Re: FSL 4.1.2 tbss_2_reg and SGE

Jayanth Kolar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:30:18 -0500

148 lines

Re: FSL 4.1.2 tbss_2_reg and SGE

Jesper Andersson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:40:36 +0000

151 lines

Re: FSL 4.1.2 tbss_2_reg and SGE

Jayanth Kolar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:53:51 -0500

205 lines

Re: FSL 4.1.2 tbss_2_reg and SGE

Mahinda Yogarajah <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:50:57 +0000

26 lines

Re: FSL 4.1.2 tbss_2_reg and SGE

Jesper Andersson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:59:17 +0000

40 lines

Re: FSL 4.1.2 tbss_2_reg and SGE

David Flitney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:07:00 +0000

42 lines

Re: FSL 4.1.2 tbss_2_reg and SGE

David Flitney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:10:21 +0000

25 lines

Re: FSL 4.1.2 tbss_2_reg and SGE

Mahinda Yogarajah <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:29:34 +0000

33 lines

Re: FSL 4.1.2 tbss_2_reg and SGE

Mahinda Yogarajah <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:35:51 +0000

621 lines

Re: FSL 4.1.2 tbss_2_reg and SGE

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 11:33:50 +0000

44 lines

Re: FSL 4.1.2 tbss_2_reg and SGE

Mahinda Yogarajah <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:14:54 +0000

18 lines

New Thread

FSL 4.1.2 tbss_2_reg and SGE solution

Re: FSL 4.1.2 tbss_2_reg and SGE solution

Mahinda Yogarajah <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:15:27 +0000

21 lines

New Thread

FSL Digest - 24 Mar 2009 to 25 Mar 2009 - Special issue (#2009-86)

Re: FSL Digest - 24 Mar 2009 to 25 Mar 2009 - Special issue (#2009-86)

Mazerolle, Erin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:44:30 -0400

104 lines

Re: FSL Digest - 24 Mar 2009 to 25 Mar 2009 - Special issue (#2009-86)

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:35:31 +0000

115 lines

New Thread

FSL download for Ubuntu 8.10 64bit version ?

FSL download for Ubuntu 8.10 64bit version ?

Jayanth Kolar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:39:45 +0000

626 lines

Re: FSL download for Ubuntu 8.10 64bit version ?

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:48:14 -0500

40 lines

Re: FSL download for Ubuntu 8.10 64bit version ?

Jayanth Kolar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:59:19 +0000

66 lines

Re: FSL download for Ubuntu 8.10 64bit version ?

Michael Hanke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:16:16 +0200

38 lines

Re: FSL download for Ubuntu 8.10 64bit version ?

Jayanth Kolar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:00:53 +0000

205 lines

Re: FSL download for Ubuntu 8.10 64bit version ?

Michael Hanke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:07:11 +0200

146 lines

Re: FSL download for Ubuntu 8.10 64bit version ?

Jayanth Kolar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:21:50 +0000

401 lines

Re: FSL download for Ubuntu 8.10 64bit version ?

Michael Hanke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:34:46 +0200

188 lines

Re: FSL download for Ubuntu 8.10 64bit version ?

Jayanth Kolar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:36:43 +0000

444 lines

Re: FSL download for Ubuntu 8.10 64bit version ?

Jayanth Kolar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:06:14 +0000

450 lines

New Thread

FSL FIRST problems in patients with dementia

FSL FIRST problems in patients with dementia

Kempton, Matthew <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 13:46:33 -0000

173 lines

New Thread

FSL VBM

FSL VBM

Amit Raheja <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:37:13 +0000

24 lines

New Thread

FSL VBM Question

FSL VBM Question

Dinesh Shukla <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 01:59:39 -0700

105 lines

New Thread

FSL-VBM (fslvbm_3_proc) clarification questions

FSL-VBM (fslvbm_3_proc) clarification questions

Antonios-Konstantinos Thanellas <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:12:40 +0000

44 lines

New Thread

fslmaths

fslmaths

cathyliu <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 21:59:04 +0800

102 lines

Re: fslmaths

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:35:24 -0500

319 lines

Re: fslmaths

cathyliu <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 03:48:41 +0800

246 lines

New Thread

fslmaths -thrP

fslmaths -thrP

Anastasia A Ford <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:29:26 +0000

25 lines

Re: fslmaths -thrP

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 09:45:21 +0000

49 lines

Re: fslmaths -thrP

Anastasia A Ford <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:41:27 +0100

32 lines

Re: fslmaths -thrP

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:14:23 +0200

112 lines

New Thread

FSLOUTPUTTYPE problem v4.1.2

FSLOUTPUTTYPE problem v4.1.2

Jeroen Siero <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 20:28:30 +0000

30 lines

Re: FSLOUTPUTTYPE problem v4.1.2

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:59:54 +0000

52 lines

New Thread

FSLUTIL to compute the total Z of an image...

FSLUTIL to compute the total Z of an image...

Gonzalo Rojas <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 01:17:42 -0300

25 lines

Re: FSLUTIL to compute the total Z of an image...

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:09:39 +0000

38 lines

New Thread

FSLVBM image input

FSLVBM image input

Julian Henty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 14:42:17 -0000

189 lines

New Thread

fslview

fslview

carlos silva pereira <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 16:18:31 +0000

25 lines

Re: fslview

David Flitney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 16:33:26 +0000

29 lines

New Thread

fslview problem

fslview problem

j janssen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 12:19:31 +0100

50 lines

New Thread

ftoz segmentation fault

ftoz segmentation fault

John Herrington <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 22:02:55 +0000

30 lines

Re: ftoz segmentation fault

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 07:41:34 +0000

52 lines

Re: ftoz segmentation fault

John Herrington <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 08:16:47 -0500

60 lines

Re: ftoz segmentation fault

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 15:37:57 +0000

67 lines

New Thread

Fugue

Fugue

Megan Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 22:41:40 +0000

40 lines

Re: Fugue

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 14:01:38 +0000

68 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Job Ad (Research Associate/Senior Research Associate (fMRI Methods))

Fwd: Job Ad (Research Associate/Senior Research Associate (fMRI Methods))

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:42:12 +0000

97 lines

New Thread

Fwd: [FSL] Using atlas regions as a mask

Fwd: [FSL] Using atlas regions as a mask

Michael Scheel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:41:01 -0700

44 lines

New Thread

Getting good extractions

Getting good extractions

Dav Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 14:43:04 -0800

21 lines

Re: Getting good extractions

David V. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 17:58:32 -0500

52 lines

New Thread

GM ROIs

GM ROIs

Kelly Silva <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:57:26 +0100

14 lines

Re: GM ROIs

Lindgren, Kristen, Ann <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:13:04 -0400

29 lines

New Thread

Group ICA

Group ICA

Yuki Sakai <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:04:13 +0000

28 lines

Re: Group ICA

Suresh Joel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 07:43:28 -0400

51 lines

Re: Group ICA

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:12:59 +0000

158 lines

Re: Group ICA

Yuki Sakai <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:28:19 +0000

24 lines

Re: Group ICA

Yuki Sakai <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:41:55 +0000

34 lines

Re: Group ICA

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 21:40:04 +0000

47 lines

New Thread

group mean when one subject had only one session

group mean when one subject had only one session

George He <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:32:10 -0400

37 lines

Re: group mean when one subject had only one session

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 05:05:45 +0100

40 lines

Re: group mean when one subject had only one session

George He <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 07:49:41 -0400

112 lines

New Thread

GROUP MELODIC

Re: GROUP MELODIC

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:37:21 +0000

67 lines

Re: GROUP MELODIC

Elisabeth Jonckers <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 16:37:51 +0000

39 lines

New Thread

groups are unequal in size

groups are unequal in size

Yi-Shin Sheu <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Mar 2009 02:27:57 +0100

38 lines

Re: groups are unequal in size

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Mar 2009 07:55:46 +0100

61 lines

New Thread

grow virtual drive...

grow virtual drive...

Gonzalo Rojas Costa <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:20:15 -0400

18 lines

Re: grow virtual drive...

Yapeng WANG <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:40:36 -0700

33 lines

Re: grow virtual drive...

Duncan Mortimer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:35:12 +0000

532 lines

New Thread

How to create design.mat and design.con files for VBM

How to create design.mat and design.con files for VBM

Moran Artzi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 13:15:29 +0000

33 lines

Re: How to create design.mat and design.con files for VBM

Reza Salimi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 13:29:27 +0000

101 lines

New Thread

How to extract FA values in a atlas space in TBSS?

How to extract FA values in a atlas space in TBSS?

Yapeng WANG <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:05:13 +0000

45 lines

Re: How to extract FA values in a atlas space in TBSS?

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 09:40:47 +0000

72 lines

Re: How to extract FA values in a atlas space in TBSS?

Yapeng WANG <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 10:09:28 -0700

183 lines

New Thread

how to smooth an image

how to smooth an image

Silviu Podariu <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:04:13 +0000

21 lines

Re: how to smooth an image

Reza Salimi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:18:20 +0000

78 lines

New Thread

Is FSL compatible with the new MAC Pro 8 core

Is FSL compatible with the new MAC Pro 8 core

Erhan Genc <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:14:45 +0000

22 lines

Re: Is FSL compatible with the new MAC Pro 8 core

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 22:21:54 +0000

47 lines

New Thread

Job opportunity in Neuroimaging in Hamburg

Job opportunity in Neuroimaging in Hamburg

Niklas Stein <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:29:30 +0200

56 lines

New Thread

Juelich Histological Atlas

Juelich Histological Atlas

Svenja Diekhoff <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:20:10 +0100

35 lines

Re: Juelich Histological Atlas

Impe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 15:41:26 +0100

48 lines

Re: Juelich Histological Atlas

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Mar 2009 05:34:54 +0000

42 lines

Re: Juelich Histological Atlas

Bruce Fischl <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Mar 2009 21:52:00 -0400

34 lines

New Thread

Mask for the retrosplenial cortex

Mask for the retrosplenial cortex

Hallvard Røe Evensmoen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:19:22 +0000

19 lines

New Thread

match between behaivor and fMRI

match between behaivor and fMRI

Hongyu Yang <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:56:48 +0000

22 lines

Re: match between behaivor and fMRI

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 09:56:22 +0000

45 lines

Re: match between behaivor and fMRI

Hongyu Yang <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 18:35:04 +0000

26 lines

New Thread

Mean FA skeleton values

Mean FA skeleton values

Cibu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 11:54:44 -0400

117 lines

New Thread

mean_FA_skeleton values around 2000 til 8000

mean_FA_skeleton values around 2000 til 8000

Michael Scheel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 11:18:14 -0800

25 lines

Re: mean_FA_skeleton values around 2000 til 8000

Kathrine Skak Madsen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 20:33:58 +0100

39 lines

Re: mean_FA_skeleton values around 2000 til 8000

Michael Scheel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 12:20:40 -0800

48 lines

Re: mean_FA_skeleton values around 2000 til 8000

Kathrine Skak Madsen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 23:25:56 +0100

58 lines

Re: mean_FA_skeleton values around 2000 til 8000

Dylan Alegria <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 23:55:47 +0000

89 lines

Re: mean_FA_skeleton values around 2000 til 8000

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:26:04 -0700

125 lines

New Thread

Melodic Output - Further Group Analysis

Re: Melodic Output - Further Group Analysis

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:35:34 +0000

82 lines

New Thread

memory in FSL 4.1*

Re: memory in FSL 4.1*

Lisa Lu <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 18:52:48 +0000

169 lines

New Thread

mis-registration on tbss_2

mis-registration on tbss_2

Katie Karlsgodt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 08:52:18 -0700

93 lines

Re: mis-registration on tbss_2

David Gutman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:02:16 +0000

112 lines

New Thread

Mixed-effects analysis

Mixed-effects analysis

MCLAREN, Donald <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 13:41:50 -0600

81 lines

Re: Mixed-effects analysis

Jeanette Mumford <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 12:18:35 -0800

131 lines

New Thread

MNI normalizatin of partial EPI datasets

MNI normalizatin of partial EPI datasets

Patrick Bedard <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:03:16 +0000

17 lines

Re: MNI normalizatin of partial EPI datasets

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:34:46 +0000

40 lines

New Thread

modeling slope over time

modeling slope over time

Kyle Kern <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 03:01:24 +0000

44 lines

Re: modeling slope over time

MCLAREN, Donald <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 00:06:11 -0500

147 lines

New Thread

MPRAGE dicom converted in mri_convert display awkward

MPRAGE dicom converted in mri_convert display awkward

Rami Niazy <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 08:46:39 +0300

626 lines

Re: MPRAGE dicom converted in mri_convert display awkward

Michael T Rubens <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:18:00 -0700

81 lines

Re: MPRAGE dicom converted in mri_convert display awkward

Rami Niazy <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 09:28:35 +0300

107 lines

Re: MPRAGE dicom converted in mri_convert display awkward

Douglas N Greve <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:48:27 -0400

64 lines

Re: MPRAGE dicom converted in mri_convert display awkward

Gregg DiGirolamo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 01:40:32 +0100

18 lines

Re: MPRAGE dicom converted in mri_convert display awkward

Yi-Shin Sheu <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:56:13 -0500

75 lines

Re: MPRAGE dicom converted in mri_convert display awkward

Kerstin Pannek <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:25:44 +1000

51 lines

Re: MPRAGE dicom converted in mri_convert display awkward

Gregg DiGirolamo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 03:46:41 +0100

16 lines

Re: MPRAGE dicom converted in mri_convert display awkward

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 07:23:45 +0100

34 lines

New Thread

multiplying matrix for motion correction of Merged DW repetitions

Re: multiplying matrix for motion correction of Merged DW repetitions

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 09:44:31 +0000

166 lines

Re: multiplying matrix for motion correction of Merged DW repetitions

Siew-Min Gan <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Mar 2009 18:22:16 +1100

114 lines

New Thread

negative eigenvalues problem (template)

negative eigenvalues problem (template)

Eddy D.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 17:34:00 +0000

18 lines

Re: negative eigenvalues problem (template)

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 10:59:29 +0100

42 lines

New Thread

neuroimaging lab research assistant position

neuroimaging lab research assistant position

Shelli Kesler <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:44:56 +0000

20 lines

New Thread

New with FSL

New with FSL

Nick Papanikolaou <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Mar 2009 17:38:48 +0000

36 lines

Re: New with FSL

Duncan Mortimer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:12:37 +0000

140 lines

Re: New with FSL

Michael Hanke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:21:39 +0100

75 lines

Re: New with FSL

Duncan Mortimer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:47:37 +0000

136 lines

Re: New with FSL

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:41:52 +0800

41 lines

Re: New with FSL

Nick Papanikolaou <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:46:09 +0000

21 lines

Re: New with FSL

Duncan Mortimer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 15:03:19 +0000

102 lines

Re: New with FSL

Nickolas Papanikolaou <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:27:02 +0200

46 lines

Re: New with FSL

Duncan Mortimer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:42:03 +0000

191 lines

Re: New with FSL

Nickolas Papanikolaou <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:16:44 +0200

227 lines

Re: New with FSL

Duncan Mortimer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:09:38 +0000

274 lines

Re: New with FSL

Nickolas Papanikolaou <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:25:49 +0200

280 lines

Re: New with FSL

David Flitney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:48:08 +0000

30 lines

Re: New with FSL

Feng Xue <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:20:06 +0800

92 lines

Re: New with FSL

Feng Xue <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:45:05 +0800

48 lines

New Thread

nifit_read_buffer error

nifit_read_buffer error

Michael Scheel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:52:58 -0700

22 lines

Re: nifit_read_buffer error

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:19:17 +0100

47 lines

New Thread

Obtain Average Mask using FIRST?

Obtain Average Mask using FIRST?

Jayanth Kolar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:37:58 -0500

58 lines

Re: Obtain Average Mask using FIRST?

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:08:29 +0000

60 lines

Re: Obtain Average Mask using FIRST?

Jayanth Kolar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:31:19 -0500

184 lines

Re: Obtain Average Mask using FIRST?

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:01:12 +0000

112 lines

New Thread

Odd results from fslmaths and fslstats

Odd results from fslmaths and fslstats

Lindgren, Kristen, Ann <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:08:41 -0400

59 lines

Re: Odd results from fslmaths and fslstats

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 08:11:37 +0000

86 lines

Re: Odd results from fslmaths and fslstats

Lindgren, Kristen, Ann <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 07:45:34 -0400

100 lines

New Thread

One more question

Re: One more question

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:47:04 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

One vs. Many comparison

One vs. Many comparison

Rajkumar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 22:33:50 -0500

25 lines

Re: One vs. Many comparison

Thomas Nichols <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 22:07:38 +0000

152 lines

New Thread

Open Position for Data Analysis Research Assistant at Stanford University

Open Position for Data Analysis Research Assistant at Stanford University

Lucina Uddin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:13:10 +0000

35 lines

New Thread

output two-sample t-test

output two-sample t-test

Elisabeth Jonckers <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 14:39:04 +0000

33 lines

Re: output two-sample t-test

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:21:08 +0000

60 lines

New Thread

Pearson r for TBSS data

Pearson r for TBSS data

Robert <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 06:46:27 +0000

23 lines

Re: Pearson r for TBSS data

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:15:29 +0000

47 lines

New Thread

percent signal change - outliers and thresholding

percent signal change - outliers and thresholding

Lara Foland <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:39:16 +0000

29 lines

Re: percent signal change - outliers and thresholding

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:15:00 +0000

56 lines

Re: percent signal change - outliers and thresholding

Lara Foland <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:09:10 +0000

75 lines

Re: percent signal change - outliers and thresholding

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 09:13:03 +0000

98 lines

New Thread

PhD and Post-doc Positions in Systems Neuroscience

PhD and Post-doc Positions in Systems Neuroscience

Katharina von Kriegstein <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 21:52:39 +0100

154 lines

New Thread

PhD and Post-doc Positions in Theoretical Neuroscience

PhD and Post-doc Positions in Theoretical Neuroscience

Katharina von Kriegstein <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 21:51:54 +0100

144 lines

New Thread

Plans for GPUs in FSL processing?

Re: Plans for GPUs in FSL processing?

Eric Claus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 23:56:25 +0000

26 lines

Re: Plans for GPUs in FSL processing?

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 06:32:41 +0000

51 lines

Re: Plans for GPUs in FSL processing?

Michael Hanke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 08:19:40 +0100

43 lines

Re: Plans for GPUs in FSL processing?

Andrew Janke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:58:28 +1100

41 lines

New Thread

Possible Featquery bug

Possible Featquery bug

Feng Xue <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 18:51:05 +0800

31 lines

Re: Possible Featquery bug

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 08:02:59 +0000

73 lines

Re: Possible Featquery bug

Feng Xue <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 17:51:03 +0800

76 lines

New Thread

Post probtrackx analyses - thresholds for fdt_paths

Post probtrackx analyses - thresholds for fdt_paths

Lindgren, Kristen, Ann <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:56:49 -0400

47 lines

Re: Post probtrackx analyses - thresholds for fdt_paths

Lindgren, Kristen, Ann <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 08:44:28 -0400

91 lines

Re: Post probtrackx analyses - thresholds for fdt_paths

Lindgren, Kristen, Ann <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:25:52 -0400

115 lines

Re: Post probtrackx analyses - thresholds for fdt_paths

Cherif Sahyoun <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:49:38 -0400

150 lines

Re: Post probtrackx analyses - thresholds for fdt_paths

Lindgren, Kristen, Ann <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:21:02 -0400

189 lines

Re: Post probtrackx analyses - thresholds for fdt_paths

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:31:58 -0500

302 lines

Re: Post probtrackx analyses - thresholds for fdt_paths

Lindgren, Kristen, Ann <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:26:57 -0400

342 lines

Re: Post probtrackx analyses - thresholds for fdt_paths

Cherif Sahyoun <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:41:51 -0400

368 lines

Re: Post probtrackx analyses - thresholds for fdt_paths

Lindgren, Kristen, Ann <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:29:44 -0400

438 lines

Re: Post probtrackx analyses - thresholds for fdt_paths

Cherif Sahyoun <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:06:00 -0400

453 lines

Re: Post probtrackx analyses - thresholds for fdt_paths

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:54:05 -0500

564 lines

Re: Post probtrackx analyses - thresholds for fdt_paths

Lindgren, Kristen, Ann <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:45:15 -0400

584 lines

Re: Post probtrackx analyses - thresholds for fdt_paths

Cherif Sahyoun <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 19:00:19 -0400

588 lines

Re: Post probtrackx analyses - thresholds for fdt_paths

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 19:14:10 -0500

700 lines

Re: Post probtrackx analyses - thresholds for fdt_paths

Martin Kavec <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:36:15 +0100

73 lines

Re: Post probtrackx analyses - thresholds for fdt_paths

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 18:48:22 -0500

336 lines

Re: Post probtrackx analyses - thresholds for fdt_paths

Lindgren, Kristen, Ann <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 20:19:52 -0400

117 lines

Re: Post probtrackx analyses - thresholds for fdt_paths

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 20:18:15 -0500

115 lines

Re: Post probtrackx analyses - thresholds for fdt_paths

Lindgren, Kristen, Ann <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 21:29:40 -0400

161 lines

Re: Post probtrackx analyses - thresholds for fdt_paths

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 20:34:09 -0500

147 lines

Re: Post probtrackx analyses - thresholds for fdt_paths

Martin Kavec <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 09:46:49 +0200

89 lines

Re: Post probtrackx analyses - thresholds for fdt_paths

Lindgren, Kristen, Ann <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 09:32:57 -0400

120 lines

New Thread

Post-Doc positions for TBI

Post-Doc positions for TBI

Terrence R Oakes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 14:28:45 -0500

36 lines

New Thread

Post-doctoral position

Post-doctoral position

Stephane Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 00:28:59 +0000

41 lines

post-doctoral position

Julius Fridriksson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:46:36 +0100

38 lines

New Thread

Postdoctoral Associate position in fMRI/TMS, Cardiff University, UK

Postdoctoral Associate position in fMRI/TMS, Cardiff University, UK

Andrew Lawrence <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:31:24 +0000

73 lines

New Thread

Postdoctoral Fellow at Imperial College, allied with GlaxoSmithKline Clinical Imaging Centre

Postdoctoral Fellow at Imperial College, allied with GlaxoSmithKline Clinical Imaging Centre

Thomas Nichols <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 09:43:02 +0000

288 lines

New Thread

Postdoctoral Fellow Position

Postdoctoral Fellow Position

Crystal Franklin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:15:35 -0500

176 lines

New Thread

Postdoctoral Fellowship at Stanford University

Postdoctoral Fellowship at Stanford University

Lucina Uddin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 00:17:12 +0000

34 lines

New Thread

POSTDOCTORAL POSITION - COGNITIVE CONTROL

POSTDOCTORAL POSITION - COGNITIVE CONTROL

Adam Aron <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:44:34 +0100

43 lines

New Thread

POSTDOCTORAL POSITION - IMAGING OF NEURODEGENERATION

POSTDOCTORAL POSITION - IMAGING OF NEURODEGENERATION

Adam Aron <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 21:12:53 +0000

45 lines

New Thread

presentation of fdt paths

presentation of fdt paths

Mi Jung Kim <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:14:07 +0000

21 lines

Re: presentation of fdt paths

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:19:51 +0100

91 lines

Re: presentation of fdt paths

Mi Jung Kim <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:38:57 -0700

122 lines

New Thread

Preserve concentration option in FNIRT

Preserve concentration option in FNIRT

Mahinda Yogarajah <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:21:15 +0000

17 lines

Re: Preserve concentration option in FNIRT

Jesper Andersson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:42:45 +0000

47 lines

New Thread

prewhitened data

prewhitened data

Ning Liu <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:03:32 +0000

27 lines

Re: prewhitened data

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 07:01:39 +0000

52 lines

Re: prewhitened data

Ning Liu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:48:42 +0000

26 lines

Re: prewhitened data

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:05:23 +0000

60 lines

Re: prewhitened data

Ning Liu <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 21:30:29 +0000

29 lines

Re: prewhitened data

Ning Liu <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 23:46:11 +0000

16 lines

New Thread

problem with fslchfiletype

problem with fslchfiletype

Enzo Tagliazucchi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 04:21:29 +0000

32 lines

Re: problem with fslchfiletype

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 06:13:26 +0000

53 lines

New Thread

probtrackx and thalamocortical tracts

probtrackx and thalamocortical tracts

Marenco, Stefano (NIH/NIMH) [E] <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:40:03 -0400

229 lines

Re: probtrackx and thalamocortical tracts

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:50:47 -0500

362 lines

Re: probtrackx and thalamocortical tracts

Marenco, Stefano (NIH/NIMH) [E] <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:52:00 -0400

557 lines

Re: probtrackx and thalamocortical tracts

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:03:58 -0500

647 lines

Re: probtrackx and thalamocortical tracts

Marenco, Stefano (NIH/NIMH) [E] <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:44:58 -0400

731 lines

Re: probtrackx and thalamocortical tracts

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:12:25 -0500

822 lines

New Thread

probtrackx execution error

probtrackx execution error

Svenja Caspers <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 12:54:34 +0000

38 lines

Re: probtrackx execution error

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:32:38 +0100

120 lines

New Thread

probtrackx for capillary phantom

probtrackx for capillary phantom

Mi Jung Kim <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:43:32 +0000

22 lines

New Thread

probtrackx with two waypointmasks

probtrackx with two waypointmasks

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 23:13:12 +0100

95 lines

Re: probtrackx with two waypointmasks

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 18:10:46 -0500

311 lines

Re: probtrackx with two waypointmasks

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:29:46 +0100

276 lines

Re: probtrackx with two waypointmasks

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:52:47 +0100

314 lines

New Thread

Q: How to de-smooth BOLD images, previously smoothed with a known kernel-width?

Q: How to de-smooth BOLD images, previously smoothed with a known kernel-width?

Rajeev Raizada <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 13:12:06 +0000

38 lines

Re: Q: How to de-smooth BOLD images, previously smoothed with a known kernel-width?

Michael T Rubens <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 09:27:24 -0800

105 lines

New Thread

Q:VBM analysis

Q:VBM analysis

Moran Artzi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 05:20:08 +0000

22 lines

New Thread

Q:VBM randomise

Q:VBM randomise

Moran Artzi <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Mar 2009 20:36:30 +0000

179 lines

Re: Q:VBM randomise

Reza Salimi <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Mar 2009 20:49:17 +0000

159 lines

New Thread

Quadruple Paired T-Test

Quadruple Paired T-Test

Bramen, Jennifer E. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 10:53:20 -0800

76 lines

Re: Quadruple Paired T-Test

Jeanette Mumford <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 14:42:39 -0800

288 lines

Re: Quadruple Paired T-Test

Bramen, Jennifer E. <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Mar 2009 13:52:13 -0700

180 lines

Re: Quadruple Paired T-Test

Bramen, Jennifer E. <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Mar 2009 19:24:19 -0700

216 lines

Re: Quadruple Paired T-Test

Jeanette Mumford <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 13:25:48 -0800

480 lines

New Thread

Question about FSL licensing

Question about FSL licensing

Chris Samuel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:33:52 +1100

41 lines

Re: Question about FSL licensing

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 09:26:56 +0100

59 lines

Re: Question about FSL licensing

Chris Samuel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:28:58 +1100

25 lines

Re: Question about FSL licensing

Dave Flitney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 08:32:36 +0000

40 lines

Re: Question about FSL licensing

Dave Flitney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 08:35:55 +0000

24 lines

New Thread

Question about second level analysis

Question about second level analysis

Yunjie Tong <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 17:08:57 -0500

21 lines

Re: Question about second level analysis

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 07:45:01 +0000

51 lines

New Thread

Questions on cluster tool

Questions on cluster tool

Raymond Salvador <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:59:45 +0100

81 lines

Re: Questions on cluster tool

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 23:24:17 +0000

83 lines

New Thread

randomise and voxel-dependent EVs

randomise and voxel-dependent EVs

Herve Lemaitre <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:42:55 +0000

22 lines

Re: randomise and voxel-dependent EVs

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:59:47 +0000

45 lines

Re: randomise and voxel-dependent EVs

Lemaitre, Herve (NIH/NIMH) [F] <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:03:13 -0400

63 lines

Re: randomise and voxel-dependent EVs

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:32:00 +0000

79 lines

New Thread

randomise regression

randomise regression

John Kuster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 16:15:10 +0000

21 lines

New Thread

randomise regression?

randomise regression?

John Kuster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 11:29:31 -0500

19 lines

New Thread

randomise results meaning

randomise results meaning

xuebai <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:24:08 +0000

71 lines

Re: randomise results meaning

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:29:55 +0000

52 lines

New Thread

Randomise results questions

Randomise results questions

Angelica Hotiu <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 06:19:28 +0000

57 lines

Re: Randomise results questions

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 07:25:42 +0000

107 lines

Re: Randomise results questions

Angelica Hotiu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 14:42:06 +0000

124 lines

New Thread

randomise: modeling the mean

randomise: modeling the mean

Christopher Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 21:25:50 +0000

44 lines

Re: randomise: modeling the mean

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 10:10:41 +0000

71 lines

New Thread

Re : [FSL] Better spatial normalization of subcortial regions with FSL FIRST?

Re : [FSL] Better spatial normalization of subcortial regions with FSL FIRST?

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:02:52 -0700

54 lines

Re: Re : [FSL] Better spatial normalization of subcortial regions with FSL FIRST?

Brian Patenaude <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:24:39 -0000

73 lines

Re: Re : [FSL] Better spatial normalization of subcortial regions with FSL FIRST?

Buyean Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:49:10 -0400

283 lines

New Thread

Re : [FSL] Colour Bar Significance Values

Re: Re : [FSL] Colour Bar Significance Values

Ronan Joseph Kelly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 11:49:52 +0000

193 lines

Re: Re : [FSL] Colour Bar Significance Values

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 04:27:20 -0800

140 lines

Re: Re : [FSL] Colour Bar Significance Values

Ronan Joseph Kelly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 16:46:00 +0000

320 lines

New Thread

Re : [FSL] FSL VBM

Re : [FSL] FSL VBM

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 02:44:06 -0700

49 lines

Re: Re : [FSL] FSL VBM

Amit Raheja <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:18:07 +0000

441 lines

Re: Re : [FSL] FSL VBM

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:28:34 -0700

37 lines

Re: Re : [FSL] FSL VBM

Amit Raheja <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:24:40 +0000

64 lines

Re: Re : [FSL] FSL VBM

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 07:45:21 -0700

86 lines

New Thread

Re : [FSL] FSL VBM Question

Re : [FSL] FSL VBM Question

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 06:59:56 -0700

93 lines

Re: Re : [FSL] FSL VBM Question

Dinesh Shukla <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:08:03 -0700

1124 lines

Re: Re : [FSL] FSL VBM Question

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 07:22:43 -0700

774 lines

New Thread

Re : [FSL] FSL-VBM (fslvbm_3_proc) clarification questions

Re : [FSL] FSL-VBM (fslvbm_3_proc) clarification questions

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 07:42:29 -0700

99 lines

Re: Re : [FSL] FSL-VBM (fslvbm_3_proc) clarification questions

Antonios-Konstantinos Thanellas <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:56:53 +0000

10 lines

New Thread

Re : [FSL] FSLVBM image input

Re : [FSL] FSLVBM image input

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 06:48:38 -0800

66 lines

New Thread

Re : [FSL] Mean FA skeleton values

Re : [FSL] Mean FA skeleton values

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:15:23 -0700

41 lines

New Thread

Re : [FSL] mis-registration on tbss_2

Re : [FSL] mis-registration on tbss_2

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:26:09 -0700

58 lines

New Thread

Re : [FSL] Preserve concentration option in FNIRT

Re : [FSL] Preserve concentration option in FNIRT

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 08:36:21 -0700

37 lines

New Thread

Re : [FSL] Q:VBM analysis

Re : [FSL] Q:VBM analysis

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:34:29 -0700

48 lines

New Thread

Re : [FSL] randomise results meaning

Re : [FSL] randomise results meaning

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 06:30:28 -0700

561 lines

New Thread

Re : [FSL] Re : [FSL] Strange t-stats in vbm analysis

Re : [FSL] Re : [FSL] Strange t-stats in vbm analysis

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:26:24 -0700

50 lines

New Thread

Re : [FSL] Strange t-stats in vbm analysis

Re : [FSL] Strange t-stats in vbm analysis

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 06:30:43 -0700

46 lines

Re : [FSL] Strange t-stats in vbm analysis

Philip Koester <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 15:10:32 +0000

27 lines

New Thread

Re : [FSL] VBM trouble: no GM_mod_merg file

Re : [FSL] VBM trouble: no GM_mod_merg file

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:02:39 -0700

148 lines

Re: Re : [FSL] VBM trouble: no GM_mod_merg file

David Lahna <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:37:11 -0700

221 lines

Re: Re : [FSL] VBM trouble: no GM_mod_merg file

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 08:28:46 -0700

264 lines

Re: Re : [FSL] VBM trouble: no GM_mod_merg file

David Lahna <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:41:49 -0700

274 lines

Re: Re : [FSL] VBM trouble: no GM_mod_merg file

David Lahna <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:03:03 +0000

200 lines

Re: Re : [FSL] VBM trouble: no GM_mod_merg file

David Lahna <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:09:10 +0000

16 lines

Re: Re : [FSL] VBM trouble: no GM_mod_merg file

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 04:24:14 -0700

34 lines

New Thread

Reconstruction DTI image

Reconstruction DTI image

Eddy D.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 11:24:57 +0000

19 lines

Re: Reconstruction DTI image

John Colby <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 15:41:03 +0000

34 lines

Re: Reconstruction DTI image

Eddy D.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 16:43:27 +0000

18 lines

Re: Reconstruction DTI image

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 17:21:52 +0000

43 lines

Re: Reconstruction DTI image

Eddy D.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 22:19:44 +0000

21 lines

Re: Reconstruction DTI image

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:30:35 +0000

52 lines

Re: Reconstruction DTI image

Eddy D.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:59:39 +0000

47 lines

Re: Reconstruction DTI image

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:07:54 +0000

75 lines

Re: Reconstruction DTI image

Eddy D.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:03:00 +0000

49 lines

Re: Reconstruction DTI image

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:39:35 +0000

115 lines

Re: Reconstruction DTI image

Eddy D.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:53:51 +0000

58 lines

Re: Reconstruction DTI image

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:31:38 +0000

106 lines

Re: Reconstruction DTI image

Eddy D.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:45:45 +0000

64 lines

Re: Reconstruction DTI image

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:59:54 +0000

100 lines

Re: Reconstruction DTI image

Eddy D.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:22:51 +0000

26 lines

Re: Reconstruction DTI image

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:31:08 +0000

46 lines

Re: Reconstruction DTI image

Eddy D.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:56:46 +0000

26 lines

Re: Reconstruction DTI image

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:11:57 +0000

44 lines

Re: Reconstruction DTI image

Eddy D.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 23:14:57 +0000

71 lines

Re: Reconstruction DTI image

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:01:57 +0000

102 lines

Re: Reconstruction DTI image

Eddy D.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:24:45 +0000

27 lines

Re: Reconstruction DTI image

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:02:01 +0000

46 lines

Re: Reconstruction DTI image

Eddy D.L. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:42:54 +0000

33 lines

Re: Reconstruction DTI image

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:21:55 +0000

55 lines

New Thread

Reduced FA and reduced GM associated with better performance

Reduced FA and reduced GM associated with better performance

Jürgen Hänggi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:18:24 +0100

53 lines

Re: Reduced FA and reduced GM associated with better performance

Peter Kochunov <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:24:07 -0500

89 lines

Re: Reduced FA and reduced GM associated with better performance

Jürgen Hänggi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:34:03 +0100

125 lines

New Thread

registration strangeness

registration strangeness

Gregg DiGirolamo <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 02:16:49 +0000

37 lines

Re: registration strangeness

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 11:06:10 +0000

52 lines

New Thread

resampling data

resampling data

Jee Eun Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 16:27:33 -0500

38 lines

Re: resampling data

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 21:35:17 +0000

37 lines

New Thread

Research Assistant position Children's Hospital Boston/Harvard Medical School

Research Assistant position Children's Hospital Boston/Harvard Medical School

Christopher Benjamin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:23:12 +0000

46 lines

New Thread

ROI for TBSS using FSL4.1.2

ROI for TBSS using FSL4.1.2

Angelica Hotiu <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 02:19:10 +0000

65 lines

Re: ROI for TBSS using FSL4.1.2

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:23:37 +0000

104 lines

Re: ROI for TBSS using FSL4.1.2

Angelica Hotiu <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 02:46:56 +0000

122 lines

New Thread

RPI vs LPI orientation (prior to fsl analyzes)

RPI vs LPI orientation (prior to fsl analyzes)

Regina Lapate <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:06:38 +0000

30 lines

Re: RPI vs LPI orientation (prior to fsl analyzes)

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:20:58 +0000

45 lines

Re: RPI vs LPI orientation (prior to fsl analyzes)

Donna Dierker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:43:04 -0500

78 lines

Re: RPI vs LPI orientation (prior to fsl analyzes)

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:31:19 +0000

108 lines

Re: RPI vs LPI orientation (prior to fsl analyzes)

Donna Dierker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:27:12 +0000

140 lines

New Thread

run time for randomise

run time for randomise

xuebai <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 15:01:53 +0000

81 lines

Re: run time for randomise

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 15:09:05 +0000

101 lines

Re: run time for randomise

xuebai <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 15:28:38 +0000

491 lines

Re: run time for randomise

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 10:12:49 +0000

227 lines

Re: run time for randomise

xuebai <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 14:19:02 +0000

236 lines

Re: run time for randomise

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 16:24:22 +0100

289 lines

New Thread

S0 Image from dtifit

S0 Image from dtifit

Torsten Ruest <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 20:36:47 +0000

37 lines

Re: S0 Image from dtifit

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:36:14 +0000

67 lines

Re: S0 Image from dtifit

Torsten Ruest <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 12:58:21 +0000

36 lines

Re: S0 Image from dtifit

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:37:06 -0500

45 lines

Re: S0 Image from dtifit

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:38:57 +0000

141 lines

New Thread

Satellite Meeting to OHBM 2009: Advances in Resting-state fMRI

Satellite Meeting to OHBM 2009: Advances in Resting-state fMRI

Lucina Uddin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:43:31 +0000

24 lines

New Thread

script to average dti data.

script to average dti data.

Siewmin Gan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:01:05 +0000

36 lines

Re: script to average dti data.

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:11:05 -0500

52 lines

New Thread

Scripting FSLview

Scripting FSLview

James Porter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:50:40 -0500

21 lines

Re: Scripting FSLview

Andrew Janke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 09:39:48 +1100

39 lines

Re: Scripting FSLview

Brian Patenaude <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:02:10 -0000

59 lines

New Thread

sienax

sienax

Arienzo, Donatello <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:27:07 -0400

133 lines

New Thread

SIENAX error

SIENAX error

Jayanth Kolar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 16:41:38 -0500

173 lines

Re: SIENAX error

Nestor, Liam (Contractor) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 14:44:30 -0700

130 lines

Re: SIENAX error

Arienzo, Donatello <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 18:21:08 -0400

387 lines

New Thread

Similarity measure comparing

Similarity measure comparing

siamak <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 19:07:45 +0000

33 lines

Re: Similarity measure comparing

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 23:14:03 +0000

40 lines

New Thread

Some questions about DTI analysis

Some questions about DTI analysis

Alexander Lebedev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 04:03:33 +0400

33 lines

Re: Some questions about DTI analysis

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:37:31 -0500

52 lines

Re: Some questions about DTI analysis

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:58:15 -0500

82 lines

New Thread

Specifying relative filenames

Specifying relative filenames

Daniel Shaw <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:37:09 +0000

26 lines

Re: Specifying relative filenames

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:48:44 +0000

51 lines

New Thread

Stats within a number of clusters

Stats within a number of clusters

Vina Goghari <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:15:37 -0500

15 lines

Re: Stats within a number of clusters

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:25:15 +0000

38 lines

New Thread

Stimulus Duration and PP height

Stimulus Duration and PP height

Vishwadeep Ahluwalia <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:24:26 +0000

25 lines

Re: Stimulus Duration and PP height

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 07:49:36 -0500

45 lines

Re: Stimulus Duration and PP height

Vishwadeep Ahluwalia <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:09:58 +0000

19 lines

Re: Stimulus Duration and PP height

Vishwadeep Ahluwalia <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:53:31 +0000

29 lines

Re: Stimulus Duration and PP height

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:17:25 +0000

53 lines

New Thread

Strange t-stats in vbm analysis

Strange t-stats in vbm analysis

Philip Koester <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:15:49 +0000

24 lines

New Thread

TBSS & "small volume correction"

TBSS & "small volume correction"

Stefan Kreisel <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Mar 2009 18:02:04 +0000

28 lines

Re: TBSS & "small volume correction"

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Mar 2009 18:13:14 +0000

58 lines

New Thread

TBSS and 0 intensities in FA maps.

TBSS and 0 intensities in FA maps.

Siewmin Gan <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Mar 2009 05:42:53 +0000

31 lines

TBSS and 0 intensities in FA maps.

Siew-Min Gan <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Mar 2009 18:40:46 +1100

48 lines

Re: TBSS and 0 intensities in FA maps.

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 07:38:43 +0000

53 lines

Re: TBSS and 0 intensities in FA maps.

Siew-Min Gan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 21:12:17 +1100

118 lines

Re: TBSS and 0 intensities in FA maps.

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 06:41:18 +0000

158 lines

Re: TBSS and 0 intensities in FA maps.

Siew-Min Gan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:28:55 +1100

192 lines

Re: TBSS and 0 intensities in FA maps.

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:37:36 +0000

238 lines

New Thread

tbss and multiple regression

tbss and multiple regression

Greig de Zubicaray <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:22:08 +1000

189 lines

Re: tbss and multiple regression

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:29:20 +0000

207 lines

Re: tbss and multiple regression

Thomas Nichols <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:53:52 +0000

172 lines

Re: tbss and multiple regression

Greig de Zubicaray <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 07:26:02 +1000

352 lines

New Thread

TBSS huge data processing problem

TBSS huge data processing problem