JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for GP-UK Archives


GP-UK Archives

GP-UK Archives


March 2009


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

3 working days - and still none of the 4 DESs: is this legal? (2 messages)
6 working days - and still missing 4 (FOUR) DESs for 2008 200 9! (3 messages)
6 working days - and still missing 4 (FOUR) DESs for 2008 2009! (1 message)
Bayes and patients (3 messages)
Clinicians and heart disease prevention (1 message)
Council Tax Discount - Severe Mental Impairment (6 messages)
ECG machines in general practice (7 messages)
FOIA - Re: Enquiry re NHS Mail system (1 message)
Free Masterclass on Computer Decision Support Systems at Edinburgh University (1 message)
Low Priorities Procedures and TOS (2 messages)
Mean PLatelet Volume in tabulate results (4 messages)
Meningitis vaccine recall and how to write for the Web (1 message)
NHS.net mail migration (13 messages)
Paying for infusion sets (9 messages)
QoF (18 messages)
Slide scanner (10 messages)
SNOMED-CT and Canadian EMR systems (2 messages)
so, anyone seen a cube recently? [WAS: Re: where are the cubes of yesteryear? ] [Hubris] (3 messages)
techie - with implications (5 messages)
Uninformed relatives - Part 1 (1 message)
Vit D for babies (4 messages)
Walk in centres (5 messages)
where are the cubes of yesteryear? [Hubris] (1 message)
whose can is it... (6 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

GP-UK Home

GP-UK Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

3 working days - and still none of the 4 DESs: is this legal?

3 working days - and still none of the 4 DESs: is this legal?

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:13:38 +0000

31 lines

Re: 3 working days - and still none of the 4 DESs: is this legal?

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:50:53 +0000

65 lines

New Thread

6 working days - and still missing 4 (FOUR) DESs for 2008 200 9!

Re: 6 working days - and still missing 4 (FOUR) DESs for 2008 200 9!

TIM WALTER <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:57:16 -0000

46 lines

Re: 6 working days - and still missing 4 (FOUR) DESs for 2008 200 9!

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:05:59 +0000

73 lines

Re: 6 working days - and still missing 4 (FOUR) DESs for 2008 200 9!

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:34:44 +0000

56 lines

New Thread

6 working days - and still missing 4 (FOUR) DESs for 2008 2009!

6 working days - and still missing 4 (FOUR) DESs for 2008 2009!

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:47:45 +0000

26 lines

New Thread

Bayes and patients

Bayes and patients

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 19:05:29 +0000

65 lines

Re: Bayes and patients

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 18:32:53 -0000

72 lines

Re: Bayes and patients

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 20:21:03 +0000

88 lines

New Thread

Clinicians and heart disease prevention

Clinicians and heart disease prevention

Charlotte El-Sayed <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 22:54:06 +0000

43 lines

New Thread

Council Tax Discount - Severe Mental Impairment

Council Tax Discount - Severe Mental Impairment

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:28:43 +0000

20 lines

Re: Council Tax Discount - Severe Mental Impairment

Stephen Meech <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:03:18 +0000

23 lines

Re: Council Tax Discount - Severe Mental Impairment

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:51:41 +0000

51 lines

Re: Council Tax Discount - Severe Mental Impairment

Chris Salter <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 20:01:33 +0000

71 lines

Re: Council Tax Discount - Severe Mental Impairment

Chris Salter <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 23:19:21 +0000

85 lines

Re: Council Tax Discount - Severe Mental Impairment

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:37:06 +0100

117 lines

New Thread

ECG machines in general practice

ECG machines in general practice

Laurie Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:25:11 -0000

80 lines

Re: ECG machines in general practice

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:48:11 +0000

45 lines

Re: ECG machines in general practice

Peter von Kaehne <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:50:40 +0000

34 lines

Re: ECG machines in general practice

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:05:34 +0000

33 lines

Re: ECG machines in general practice

Laurie Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:10:56 -0000

67 lines

Re: ECG machines in general practice

Dr Peter von Kaehne <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:54:09 +0000

55 lines

Re: ECG machines in general practice

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 23:46:40 +0000

58 lines

New Thread

FOIA - Re: Enquiry re NHS Mail system

Re: FOIA - Re: Enquiry re NHS Mail system

Peter von Kaehne <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 11:00:05 +0000

195 lines

New Thread

Free Masterclass on Computer Decision Support Systems at Edinburgh University

Free Masterclass on Computer Decision Support Systems at Edinburgh University

Susannah McLean <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:39:37 +0000

71 lines

New Thread

Low Priorities Procedures and TOS

Low Priorities Procedures and TOS

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:05:54 -0000

216 lines

Re: Low Priorities Procedures and TOS

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:51:45 +0000

59 lines

New Thread

Mean PLatelet Volume in tabulate results

Mean PLatelet Volume in tabulate results

Laurie Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:42:45 -0000

90 lines

Re: Mean PLatelet Volume in tabulate results

Laurie Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:08:22 -0000

159 lines

Re: Mean PLatelet Volume in tabulate results

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:28:16 +0000

15 lines

Re: Mean PLatelet Volume in tabulate results

Laurie Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:59:15 -0000

54 lines

New Thread

Meningitis vaccine recall and how to write for the Web

Meningitis vaccine recall and how to write for the Web

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 05:51:50 +0000

32 lines

New Thread

NHS.net mail migration

NHS.net mail migration

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:45:36 +0000

263 lines

Re: NHS.net mail migration

Cherry Cullen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:55:16 -0000

373 lines

Re: NHS.net mail migration

Alun Price <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:13:14 -0000

668 lines

Re: NHS.net mail migration

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:34:03 +0000

168 lines

Re: NHS.net mail migration

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:11:24 +0000

325 lines

Re: NHS.net mail migration

Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:02:00 +0000

26 lines

Re: NHS.net mail migration

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:20:40 +0000

68 lines

Re: NHS.net mail migration

Cherry Cullen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:43:14 -0000

415 lines

Re: NHS.net mail migration

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:22:17 +0000

207 lines

Re: NHS.net mail migration

Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:06:39 +0000

51 lines

Re: NHS.net mail migration

Cherry Cullen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 19:39:56 -0000

84 lines

Re: NHS.net mail migration

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:32:10 +0000

88 lines

Re: NHS.net mail migration

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:10:44 +0000

74 lines

New Thread

Paying for infusion sets

Paying for infusion sets

Kathryn Law <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:44:50 +0000

29 lines

Re: Paying for infusion sets

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:51:13 +0000

41 lines

Re: Paying for infusion sets

Alistair Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:18:32 -0000

56 lines

Re: Paying for infusion sets

Kathryn Law <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:26:06 +0000

76 lines

Re: Paying for infusion sets

Alistair Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:47:31 -0000

108 lines

Re: Paying for infusion sets

Kathryn Law <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 08:10:23 +0000

117 lines

Re: Paying for infusion sets

Tilbrook Tim <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 07:20:31 -0000

67 lines

Re: Paying for infusion sets

Kathryn Law <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 08:59:07 +0000

88 lines

Re: Paying for infusion sets

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 08:58:48 -0000

172 lines

New Thread

QoF

QoF

Graham Balin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:09:07 +1000

38 lines

Re: QoF

Gavin Jamie <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 08:42:02 +0000

53 lines

Re: QoF

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:25:37 +0000

60 lines

Re: QoF

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:35:29 +0000

52 lines

Re: QoF

Graham Balin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:43:16 +1000

35 lines

Re: QoF

Graham Balin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:52:51 +1000

56 lines

Re: QoF

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:25:07 +0000

22 lines

Re: QoF

Graham Balin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 21:33:27 +1000

21 lines

Re: QoF

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:58:12 +0000

17 lines

Re: QoF

Gavin Jamie <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:05:42 +0000

23 lines

Re: QoF

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:45:18 +0000

67 lines

Re: QoF

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:15:13 +0000

108 lines

Re: QoF

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 20:25:32 +0000

190 lines

Re: QoF

Andy Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 08:41:12 +0000

38 lines

Re: QoF

Kathryn Law <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 12:10:21 +0000

77 lines

Re: QoF

Cherry Cullen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 12:14:43 -0000

14 lines

Re: QoF

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:59:34 +0000

254 lines

Re: QoF

Graham Balin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 21:34:27 +1000

39 lines

New Thread

Slide scanner

Slide scanner

Robert Treharne Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Mar 2009 16:16:13 -0000

13 lines

Re: Slide scanner

Chris Salter <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Mar 2009 18:07:45 +0000

39 lines

Re: Slide scanner

Jel Coward <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:42:31 -0700

23 lines

Re: Slide scanner

Robert Treharne Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 06:25:17 -0000

22 lines

Re: Slide scanner

Rob Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:16:58 +0000

31 lines

Re: Slide scanner

Alistair Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:44:15 -0000

49 lines

Re: Slide scanner

David Meldrum <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:56:46 -0000

52 lines

Re: Slide scanner

David Meldrum <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:47:36 -0000

30 lines

Re: Slide scanner

Adrian McLachlan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:16:44 +0000

135 lines

Re: Slide scanner

Alistair Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:23:46 -0000

81 lines

New Thread

SNOMED-CT and Canadian EMR systems

SNOMED-CT and Canadian EMR systems

Rob Carruthers <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 04:19:24 +0000

83 lines

Re: SNOMED-CT and Canadian EMR systems

Jel Coward <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:30:23 -0700

112 lines

New Thread

so, anyone seen a cube recently? [WAS: Re: where are the cubes of yesteryear? ] [Hubris]

Re: so, anyone seen a cube recently? [WAS: Re: where are the cubes of yesteryear? ] [Hubris]

Jel Coward <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 19:54:34 -0800

33 lines

Re: so, anyone seen a cube recently? [WAS: Re: where are the cubes of yesteryear? ] [Hubris]

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 22:33:06 +0000

34 lines

Re: so, anyone seen a cube recently? [WAS: Re: where are the cubes of yesteryear? ] [Hubris]

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 23:16:12 +0000

22 lines

New Thread

techie - with implications

techie - with implications

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 09:47:55 +0000

81 lines

Re: techie - with implications

Paul Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 10:25:02 +0000

131 lines

Re: techie - with implications

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 15:31:34 +0000

47 lines

Re: techie - with implications

Ewan Davis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:58:16 -0000

54 lines

Re: techie - with implications

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 21:56:46 +0000

25 lines

New Thread

Uninformed relatives - Part 1

Re: Uninformed relatives - Part 1

John Glasspool <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 19:54:05 +0000

163 lines

New Thread

Vit D for babies

Vit D for babies

Jel Coward <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 17:06:29 -0700

19 lines

Re: Vit D for babies

Andy Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 09:28:22 +0000

24 lines

Re: Vit D for babies

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 10:11:02 +0000

53 lines

Re: Vit D for babies

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 12:53:06 +0000

71 lines

New Thread

Walk in centres

Walk in centres

jenny sudell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 23:59:14 +0900

103 lines

Re: Walk in centres

Robert Treharne Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 17:13:06 -0000

405 lines

Re: Walk in centres

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 20:27:43 +0000

24 lines

Re: Walk in centres

jenny sudell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 11:08:13 +0900

282 lines

Re: Walk in centres

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 22:34:28 +0000

20 lines

New Thread

where are the cubes of yesteryear? [Hubris]

Re: where are the cubes of yesteryear? [Hubris]

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 01:29:12 +0000

60 lines

New Thread

whose can is it...

whose can is it...

Paul Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:14:56 +0000

26 lines

Re: whose can is it...

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:33:07 +0000

67 lines

Re: whose can is it...

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 19:09:01 -0000

41 lines

Re: whose can is it...

Karen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 07:40:07 +0000

42 lines

Re: whose can is it...

Colin Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 07:57:05 -0000

55 lines

Re: whose can is it...

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:25:06 +0900

37 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
March 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager