JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Archives


EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Archives

EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Archives


February 2009


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

24th February issue of Journal Watch (1 message)
2nd February edition of Journal Watch (1 message)
A question of diagnosis or therapy (2 messages)
An invitation to attend the EBHC-KT acquainting ceremony and launcing of its website (1 message)
Anna Donald - sad news (3 messages)
Basic question about diagnostic versus prognostic studies (7 messages)
Breaking News Alert (1 message)
Career Development Fellow (Post-doctoral) positions, MRC Epidemiology Unit, Cambridge (1 message)
Clinical policy guidelines (3 messages)
Cochrane Collaboration and Pubmed are now on... Twitter (1 message)
Cochrane Job opportunity (1 message)
Conflict of Interest policy tracking (1 message)
CRD's Guidance for undertaking systematic reviews (1 message)
EBM meets CV (3 messages)
FW: Breaking News Alert (1 message)
FW: Expression of Interest (1 message)
GRADE evidence profile table (3 messages)
GRADE vs. SORT for evidence rating (1 message)
Help Needed (15 messages)
HINARI: Hoax for India (2 messages)
House keeping Please? (2 messages)
job opportunities in knowledge translation at University of York (1 message)
Job vacancy - Research Fellow (1 message)
Journal Watch (1 message)
Lack of healthcare information threatens patient safety, say leading health agencies (1 message)
Launch of the new CEBM Website (1 message)
making meta-analyses more consumer friendly (2 messages)
Mammography Screening Info from BMJonline (12 messages)
MAY 2009 COURSE: How to Practice Evidence-Based Child Health (1 message)
Medicaid and NHI - NEJM piece (1 message)
Photovoice (3 messages)
Politics (7 messages)
Qualitative research and PICO (3 messages)
Qualitative research and PICO or PECOT (1 message)
Qualitative research and PICO or PECOT & CASP checklists (2 messages)
quick question/poll (4 messages)
R: Basic question about diagnostic versus prognostic studies (1 message)
R: making meta-analyses more consumer friendly (3 messages)
R: Politics (2 messages)
RES: Basic question about diagnostic versus prognostic studies (1 message)
Richard Lehman's Journal Watch (1 message)
Search filter website (1 message)
Senior Research Fellow in Healthcare Innovation - two posts (£34,909.20-£44,290.00 pa) (1 message)
Survival curve question (5 messages)
Survival curves (1 message)
SV: Qualitative research and PICO (3 messages)
SV: Qualitative research and PICO or PECOT & CASP checklists (2 messages)
SV: SV: Qualitative research and PICO (1 message)
Unsubscribe (2 messages)
[Consumers] Mammography Screening Info from BMJonline (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Home

EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

24th February issue of Journal Watch

24th February issue of Journal Watch

Olive Goddard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:09:38 +0000

34 lines

New Thread

2nd February edition of Journal Watch

2nd February edition of Journal Watch

Olive Goddard <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:09:57 +0000

36 lines

New Thread

A question of diagnosis or therapy

Re: A question of diagnosis or therapy

K Mendis <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:58:11 +1100

113 lines

Re: A question of diagnosis or therapy

Dan Mayer <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 22:26:31 -0500

77 lines

New Thread

An invitation to attend the EBHC-KT acquainting ceremony and launcing of its website

An invitation to attend the EBHC-KT acquainting ceremony and launcing of its website

Lubna A. Al-Ansary <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:22:12 -0800

1761 lines

New Thread

Anna Donald - sad news

Anna Donald - sad news

Paul Glasziou <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:10:26 +0000

39 lines

Re: Anna Donald - sad news

Pranab Chatterjee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:58:28 +0000

165 lines

Re: Anna Donald - sad news

Maskrey Neal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:55:09 -0000

59 lines

New Thread

Basic question about diagnostic versus prognostic studies

Basic question about diagnostic versus prognostic studies

Steve Simon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:21:13 -0600

24 lines

Re: Basic question about diagnostic versus prognostic studies

Patrick Linehan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:50:53 -0500

47 lines

Re: Basic question about diagnostic versus prognostic studies

Paul Alexander <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:09:35 -0800

83 lines

Re: Basic question about diagnostic versus prognostic studies

Dr. Carlos Cuello <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:46:06 -0600

186 lines

Re: Basic question about diagnostic versus prognostic studies

Moacyr Roberto Cuce Nobre <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 11:05:14 -0300

79 lines

Re: Basic question about diagnostic versus prognostic studies

Jim Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:01:28 -0500

61 lines

Re: Basic question about diagnostic versus prognostic studies

Raval Amit <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:12:49 +0530

180 lines

New Thread

Breaking News Alert

Re: Breaking News Alert

Anastasia Mallidou <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:41:42 -0800

23579 lines

New Thread

Career Development Fellow (Post-doctoral) positions, MRC Epidemiology Unit, Cambridge

Career Development Fellow (Post-doctoral) positions, MRC Epidemiology Unit, Cambridge

David Ogilvie <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:17:31 +0000

75 lines

New Thread

Clinical policy guidelines

Clinical policy guidelines

Barry Diner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:54:38 -0600

26 lines

Re: Clinical policy guidelines

Inaki Gutierrez Ibarluzea <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:48:22 +0100

67 lines

Re: Clinical policy guidelines

Mark V. Johnston, Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:35:47 -0600

134 lines

New Thread

Cochrane Collaboration and Pubmed are now on... Twitter

Cochrane Collaboration and Pubmed are now on... Twitter

BENTLEY, Annabel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:34:04 -0000

183 lines

New Thread

Cochrane Job opportunity

Re: Cochrane Job opportunity

Olive Goddard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:19:26 +0000

82 lines

New Thread

Conflict of Interest policy tracking

Conflict of Interest policy tracking

Marcus Tolentino Silva <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:00:30 -0200

13 lines

New Thread

CRD's Guidance for undertaking systematic reviews

CRD's Guidance for undertaking systematic reviews

Kath Wright <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 16:19:57 -0000

128 lines

New Thread

EBM meets CV

EBM meets CV

Pranab Chatterjee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:26:58 +0000

92 lines

Re: EBM meets CV

Dr. Stefane Kabene <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:20:05 -0500

821 lines

Re: EBM meets CV

Ghosh, Amit K., M.D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:44:10 -0600

987 lines

New Thread

FW: Breaking News Alert

FW: Breaking News Alert

Pranab Chatterjee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 04:42:07 +0000

393 lines

New Thread

FW: Expression of Interest

FW: Expression of Interest

Craig Lockwood <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:47:56 +1030

3280 lines

New Thread

GRADE evidence profile table

GRADE evidence profile table

Eddy Lang <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 07:22:01 -0500

55 lines

Re: GRADE evidence profile table

Marguerite Koster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:07:38 -0800

146 lines

Re: GRADE evidence profile table

Dr. Carlos Cuello <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:09:48 -0600

220 lines

New Thread

GRADE vs. SORT for evidence rating

GRADE vs. SORT for evidence rating

Brian Alper MD <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:44:44 -0500

935 lines

New Thread

Help Needed

Help Needed

Pranab Chatterjee <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 16:55:03 +0000

90 lines

Re: Help Needed

Paul Alexander <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 09:03:00 -0800

117 lines

Re: Help Needed

Djulbegovic, Benjamin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 12:05:13 -0500

275 lines

Re: Help Needed

Pranab Chatterjee <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:06:21 +0000

179 lines

Re: Help Needed

Emily DeVoto <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 12:07:15 -0500

221 lines

Re: Help Needed

Jaro Wex <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:19:22 -0000

792 lines

Re: Help Needed

Rakesh Biswas <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 22:50:22 +0530

186 lines

Re: Help Needed

Pranab Chatterjee <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 18:45:40 +0000

215 lines

Re: Help Needed

Pranab Chatterjee <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 19:06:14 +0000

454 lines

Re: Help Needed

Stephen M. Perle, DC, MS <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 16:21:30 -0500

480 lines

Re: Help Needed

Netuveli, Gopal <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 22:46:34 -0000

322 lines

Re: Help Needed

Feddern-Bekcan, Tanya <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 20:50:49 -0500

145 lines

Re: Help Needed

Mathew Stone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 08:57:28 +0000

76 lines

Re: Help Needed

Jaro Wex <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:43:54 -0000

102 lines

Re: Help Needed

Pranab Chatterjee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:55:04 +0000

294 lines

New Thread

HINARI: Hoax for India

HINARI: Hoax for India

Pranab Chatterjee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 05:52:48 +0000

122 lines

Re: HINARI: Hoax for India

Pranab Chatterjee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:35:53 +0000

616 lines

New Thread

House keeping Please?

House keeping Please?

Pranab Chatterjee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:41:09 +0000

189 lines

Re: House keeping Please?

Douglas Badenoch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:01:51 +0000

109 lines

New Thread

job opportunities in knowledge translation at University of York

job opportunities in knowledge translation at University of York

Dr Carl Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:41:46 +0000

35 lines

New Thread

Job vacancy - Research Fellow

Job vacancy - Research Fellow

S Carlebach <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:10:27 +0000

68 lines

New Thread

Journal Watch

Journal Watch

Olive Goddard <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:22:37 +0000

33 lines

New Thread

Lack of healthcare information threatens patient safety, say leading health agencies

Lack of healthcare information threatens patient safety, say leading health agencies

Neil Pakenham-Walsh, UK <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:31:35 +0000

222 lines

New Thread

Launch of the new CEBM Website

Launch of the new CEBM Website

Olive Goddard <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:45:21 +0000

45 lines

New Thread

making meta-analyses more consumer friendly

making meta-analyses more consumer friendly

Emily DeVoto <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:58:59 -0500

71 lines

Re: making meta-analyses more consumer friendly

Piersante Sestini <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:06:26 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

Mammography Screening Info from BMJonline

Re: Mammography Screening Info from BMJonline

Ash Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:38:27 -0800

521 lines

Re: Mammography Screening Info from BMJonline

Paul Alexander <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 06:02:19 -0800

592 lines

Re: Mammography Screening Info from BMJonline

Djulbegovic, Benjamin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 12:01:37 -0500

1170 lines

Re: Mammography Screening Info from BMJonline

Ash Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 09:49:44 -0800

741 lines

Re: Mammography Screening Info from BMJonline

Djulbegovic, Benjamin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:06:17 -0500

911 lines

Re: Mammography Screening Info from BMJonline

Liliya Bakiyeva <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 18:14:42 +0000

1335 lines

Re: Mammography Screening Info from BMJonline

Paul Alexander <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 10:31:58 -0800

911 lines

Re: Mammography Screening Info from BMJonline

Ash Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 11:00:11 -0800

971 lines

Re: Mammography Screening Info from BMJonline

Liliya Bakiyeva <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 19:40:19 +0000

1407 lines

Re: Mammography Screening Info from BMJonline

Paul Alexander <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 11:55:27 -0800

1084 lines

Re: Mammography Screening Info from BMJonline

Paul Alexander <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 11:55:59 -0800

1084 lines

Re: Mammography Screening Info from BMJonline

Christian Lerch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 21:34:34 +0100

23 lines

New Thread

MAY 2009 COURSE: How to Practice Evidence-Based Child Health

MAY 2009 COURSE: How to Practice Evidence-Based Child Health

Centre for Evidence-Based Child Health <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:06:53 +0000

121 lines

New Thread

Medicaid and NHI - NEJM piece

Medicaid and NHI - NEJM piece

Pranab Chatterjee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:22:48 +0000

211 lines

New Thread

Photovoice

Photovoice

Allison A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 13:35:08 -0600

33 lines

Re: Photovoice

Pawel Kanturski <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 20:54:52 +0100

42 lines

Re: Photovoice

Allison A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 14:28:13 -0600

57 lines

New Thread

Politics

Re: Politics

Olive Goddard <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:58:05 +0000

51 lines

Re: Politics

Mike McDowall <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:02:33 -0000

67 lines

Re: Politics

Anne Gill <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:10:31 +0000

198 lines

Re: Politics

Olive Goddard <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:21:58 +0000

44 lines

Re: Politics

Dr. Carlos Cuello <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:06:52 -0600

176 lines

Re: Politics

Buclin Thierry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:50:09 +0100

177 lines

Re: Politics

Andrew Jull <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 07:39:55 +1300

588 lines

New Thread

Qualitative research and PICO

Qualitative research and PICO

Andrew Booth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:09:16 +0000

2453 lines

Re: Qualitative research and PICO

Martin Dawes, Dr. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:20:07 -0500

1370 lines

Re: Qualitative research and PICO

Andrew Booth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:45:25 +0000

1150 lines

New Thread

Qualitative research and PICO or PECOT

Qualitative research and PICO or PECOT

k.hopayian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 10:08:25 +0000

30 lines

New Thread

Qualitative research and PICO or PECOT & CASP checklists

Qualitative research and PICO or PECOT & CASP checklists

Padmanabhan badrinath <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 15:17:42 +0000

338 lines

Re: Qualitative research and PICO or PECOT & CASP checklists

k.hopayian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 21:03:45 +0000

138 lines

New Thread

quick question/poll

quick question/poll

Dr. Carlos Cuello <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:38:58 -0600

93 lines

Re: quick question/poll

zeyad raddadi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:34:25 -0800

116 lines

Re: quick question/poll

Brian Alper MD <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:43:19 -0500

649 lines

Re: quick question/poll

Paul Glasziou <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 21:54:37 +0000

111 lines

New Thread

R: Basic question about diagnostic versus prognostic studies

R: Basic question about diagnostic versus prognostic studies

Barbani Federico <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:46:10 +0100

72 lines

New Thread

R: making meta-analyses more consumer friendly

R: making meta-analyses more consumer friendly

Danilo Di Diodoro <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:40:35 +0100

72 lines

R: making meta-analyses more consumer friendly

Danilo Di Diodoro <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:10:16 +0100

71 lines

Re: R: making meta-analyses more consumer friendly

Raval Amit <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:58:55 +0530

194 lines

New Thread

R: Politics

R: Politics

Felice Musicco <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:49:21 +0100

94 lines

Re: R: Politics

brnbaum <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:45:22 -0800

19 lines

New Thread

RES: Basic question about diagnostic versus prognostic studies

RES: Basic question about diagnostic versus prognostic studies

Marcus Tolentino Silva <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:00:23 -0300

41 lines

New Thread

Richard Lehman's Journal Watch

Richard Lehman's Journal Watch

Olive Goddard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:33:57 +0000

32 lines

New Thread

Search filter website

Search filter website

Marcus Tolentino Silva <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 14:05:56 -0200

16 lines

New Thread

Senior Research Fellow in Healthcare Innovation - two posts (£34,909.20-£44,290.00 pa)

Senior Research Fellow in Healthcare Innovation - two posts (£34,909.20-£44,290.00 pa)

Car, Josip <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 20:22:51 +0000

303 lines

New Thread

Survival curve question

Survival curve question

Jean Levasseur <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:04:27 -0500

33 lines

Re: Survival curve question

Cristian Baicus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 06:00:34 +0200

62 lines

Re: Survival curve question

Eddy Lang <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:06:50 -0500

50 lines

Re: Survival curve question

Paul Glasziou <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:19:02 +0000

64 lines

Re: Survival curve question

Markos G Kashiouris <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:29:15 -0500

14702 lines

New Thread

Survival curves

Survival curves

Jean Levasseur <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:57:54 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

SV: Qualitative research and PICO

Re: SV: Qualitative research and PICO

Ornissa Naidoo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:16:43 +1000

462 lines

Re: SV: Qualitative research and PICO

Craig Lockwood <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:03:52 +1030

814 lines

Re: SV: Qualitative research and PICO

Dr. Carlos Cuello <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 00:52:13 -0600

76 lines

New Thread

SV: Qualitative research and PICO or PECOT & CASP checklists

SV: Qualitative research and PICO or PECOT & CASP checklists

Janet Harris <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 18:59:44 +0100

590 lines

Re: SV: Qualitative research and PICO or PECOT & CASP checklists

k.hopayian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 21:15:52 +0000

450 lines

New Thread

SV: SV: Qualitative research and PICO

SV: SV: Qualitative research and PICO

Janet Harris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:51:20 +0100

785 lines

New Thread

Unsubscribe

Unsubscribe

Dennis Allan Perkey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:44:28 -0600

162 lines

unsubscribe

Neil Burt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 01:50:39 -0800

22 lines

New Thread

[Consumers] Mammography Screening Info from BMJonline

Re: [Consumers] Mammography Screening Info from BMJonline

Richard Hockey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:19:04 +1000

307 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager