JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


February 2009


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

40% off for Records Management conference (1 message)
A Different kind of remote working (3 messages)
census data question (11 messages)
commercial use of the list (1 message)
CSA request - thanks (1 message)
Data protection issues when creating a new organisation (3 messages)
DIGITAL LIVES RESEARCH CONFERENCE 2009 (1 message)
Does anyone still remember the Crematorium? (9 messages)
Email is a wonderful medium (11 messages)
Email SARs and the Junk Filter (4 messages)
Facebook U Turn (3 messages)
FW: [data-protection] Information Commissioner's staff talk sense (1 message)
Government standards for encrypted websites (9 messages)
Health questionnaires ? (5 messages)
Information Commissioner changes tack on da ta sharing bill (4 messages)
Information Commissioner changes tack on data sharing bill (1 message)
Information Commissioner's staff talk sense (9 messages)
Is it personal data and should I release it? (3 messages)
Junk mail? (1 message)
Mandatory Minimum Measures’ (1 message)
Mandatory Minimum Measures' (2 messages)
New FSA rules on fax machines..... (3 messages)
Paper submission deadline extended: MULTICONF-09 (1 message)
Privacy professional facing criminal charges (1 message)
Proofs supplied for a SAR by a Third Party (6 messages)
Reason for leaving - dismissal (12 messages)
Resources (1 message)
Retention of spoilt Birth/Death/Marriage Certificates (1 message)
Section 11 rights at work (9 messages)
Section 29 Exemptions (3 messages)
Seminar on Sensitive Data: Perceptions and Implications - 6 March 2009 (afternoon only) (1 message)
Surveillance Society report (1 message)
Surveillance State (3 messages)
UCU Requests for External Examiner Names and Institutions (1 message)
Vacancy - Information Management Officer (1 message)
When an SAR is not an SAR (18 messages)
[POSSIBLE SPAM] Government plans travel database (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Most Recent First

From

Date

Size

New Thread

40% off for Records Management conference

40% off for Records Management conference

Hetty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:34:06 +0000

121 lines

New Thread

A Different kind of remote working

A Different kind of remote working

Clare Watts <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:26:52 +0000

81 lines

A different kind of remote working

Clare Watts <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:19:38 +0000

77 lines

A different kind of remote working

Clare Watts <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:18:20 +0000

77 lines

New Thread

census data question

Re: census data question

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:51:28 -0000

71 lines

Re: census data question

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:14:52 +0000

139 lines

Re: census data question

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:07:11 -0000

774 lines

Re: census data question

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:06:56 -0000

907 lines

Re: census data question

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:00:57 -0000

101 lines

Re: census data question

Wiper, Carl <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:47:27 +0000

683 lines

Re: census data question

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:33:07 +0000

332 lines

Re: census data question

Broadfoot, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:20:04 -0000

179 lines

Re: census data question

Carter, Antoinette (Global IS) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:12:00 -0000

117 lines

Re: census data question

Broadfoot, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:59:25 -0000

158 lines

census data question

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:32:29 +0000

41 lines

New Thread

commercial use of the list

commercial use of the list

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:54:47 +0000

156 lines

New Thread

CSA request - thanks

CSA request - thanks

Sarah Wickham <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:57:29 +0000

141 lines

New Thread

Data protection issues when creating a new organisation

Re: Data protection issues when creating a new organisation

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:48:56 -0000

397 lines

Re: Data protection issues when creating a new organisation

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:03:46 -0000

411 lines

Data protection issues when creating a new organisation

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:51:32 +0000

157 lines

New Thread

DIGITAL LIVES RESEARCH CONFERENCE 2009

DIGITAL LIVES RESEARCH CONFERENCE 2009

Lynn Young <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:38:55 +0000

118 lines

New Thread

Does anyone still remember the Crematorium?

Re: Does anyone still remember the Crematorium?

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:23:25 -0000

668 lines

Re: Does anyone still remember the Crematorium?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:13:04 +0000

231 lines

Re: Does anyone still remember the Crematorium?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:09:36 +0000

237 lines

Re: Does anyone still remember the Crematorium?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:48:40 +0000

512 lines

Re: Does anyone still remember the Crematorium?

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:45:37 -0000

634 lines

Re: Does anyone still remember the Crematorium?

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:41:56 -0000

697 lines

Re: Does anyone still remember the Crematorium?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:40:39 +0000

259 lines

Re: Does anyone still remember the Crematorium?

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:45:15 -0000

165 lines

Does anyone still remember the Crematorium?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:44:27 +0000

265 lines

New Thread

Email is a wonderful medium

Re: Email is a wonderful medium

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:37:41 +0000

211 lines

Re: Email is a wonderful medium

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:41:16 +0000

40 lines

Re: Email is a wonderful medium

Chris Bayliss <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:09:51 +0000

157 lines

Re: Email is a wonderful medium

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:04:44 +0000

179 lines

Re: Email is a wonderful medium

Andrew Charlesworth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:44:31 +0000

129 lines

Re: Email is a wonderful medium

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:27:43 +0000

295 lines

Re: Email is a wonderful medium

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:04:04 +0000

181 lines

Re: Email is a wonderful medium

cathy brode <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:56:03 +0000

307 lines

Re: Email is a wonderful medium

Ben Plouviez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:15:00 -0000

158 lines

Re: Email is a wonderful medium

Jethro R Binks <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:06:49 +0000

48 lines

Email is a wonderful medium

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:51:22 +0000

154 lines

New Thread

Email SARs and the Junk Filter

Re: Email SARs and the Junk Filter

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:48:12 -0000

355 lines

Re: Email SARs and the Junk Filter

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:27:12 -0000

571 lines

Re: Email SARs and the Junk Filter

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:18:26 -0000

377 lines

Email SARs and the Junk Filter

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:08:10 +0000

125 lines

New Thread

Facebook U Turn

Re: Facebook U Turn

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:14:16 -0500

112 lines

Re: Facebook U Turn

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:26:41 +0000

250 lines

Facebook U Turn

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:06:27 +0000

46 lines

New Thread

FW: [data-protection] Information Commissioner's staff talk sense

FW: [data-protection] Information Commissioner's staff talk sense

Jane Bartlett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:28:21 -0000

201 lines

New Thread

Government standards for encrypted websites

Re: Government standards for encrypted websites

Dr. Su Beesley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 13:40:25 +0000

87 lines

Re: Government standards for encrypted websites

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:33:05 +0000

247 lines

Re: Government standards for encrypted websites

Andrew Cormack <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:16:18 -0000

61 lines

Re: Government standards for encrypted websites

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:11:46 +0000

579 lines

Re: Government standards for encrypted websites

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:31:20 -0000

305 lines

Re: Government standards for encrypted websites

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:04:33 -0000

479 lines

Re: Government standards for encrypted websites

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:38:16 +0000

524 lines

Re: Government standards for encrypted websites

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:27:11 +0000

354 lines

Government standards for encrypted websites

Henley, Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:51:24 -0000

188 lines

New Thread

Health questionnaires ?

Re: Health questionnaires ?

Carter, Antoinette (Global IS) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:35:21 -0000

117 lines

Re: Health questionnaires ?

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:28:02 +0000

32 lines

Re: Health questionnaires ?

Jon Dunster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:07:25 +0000

41 lines

Re: Health questionnaires ?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:21:06 +0000

268 lines

Health questionnaires ?

Jon Dunster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:27:46 +0000

43 lines

New Thread

Information Commissioner changes tack on da ta sharing bill

Re: Information Commissioner changes tack on da ta sharing bill

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:35:51 -0000

250 lines

Re: Information Commissioner changes tack on da ta sharing bill

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:16:46 -0000

120 lines

Re: Information Commissioner changes tack on da ta sharing bill

Giles, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:16:56 -0000

920 lines

Re: Information Commissioner changes tack on da ta sharing bill

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:13:18 -0000

99 lines

New Thread

Information Commissioner changes tack on data sharing bill

Information Commissioner changes tack on data sharing bill

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:29:27 -0000

46 lines

New Thread

Information Commissioner's staff talk sense

Re: Information Commissioner's staff talk sense

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:22:20 +0000

43 lines

Re: Information Commissioner's staff talk sense

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:18:37 +0000

70 lines

Re: Information Commissioner's staff talk sense

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 17:39:24 -0000

63 lines

Re: Information Commissioner's staff talk sense

Bailey, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:22:35 -0000

171 lines

Re: Information Commissioner's staff talk sense

J.S.M.Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:42:14 -0000

193 lines

Re: Information Commissioner's staff talk sense

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:37:08 -0000

139 lines

Re: Information Commissioner's staff talk sense

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:29:01 -0000

92 lines

Re: Information Commissioner's staff talk sense

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:19:17 +0000

237 lines

Information Commissioner's staff talk sense

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:52:48 -0000

39 lines

New Thread

Is it personal data and should I release it?

Re: Is it personal data and should I release it?

Mark van Harmelen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:40:08 +0000

169 lines

Re: Is it personal data and should I release it?

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:39:14 -0000

522 lines

Is it personal data and should I release it?

Cotterill, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:25:20 -0000

315 lines

New Thread

Junk mail?

Junk mail?

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:46:10 -0000

877 lines

New Thread

Mandatory Minimum Measures’

Mandatory Minimum Measures’

cathy brode <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:33:57 +0000

117 lines

New Thread

Mandatory Minimum Measures'

Re: Mandatory Minimum Measures'

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:43:15 -0000

734 lines

Re: Mandatory Minimum Measures'

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:06:19 -0000

485 lines

New Thread

New FSA rules on fax machines.....

Re: New FSA rules on fax machines.....

Pat Walshe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:55:30 +0000

44 lines

Re: New FSA rules on fax machines.....

Pat Walshe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:09:46 +0000

35 lines

New FSA rules on fax machines.....

Clare Watts <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:54:47 +0000

49 lines

New Thread

Paper submission deadline extended: MULTICONF-09

Re: Paper submission deadline extended: MULTICONF-09

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 16:31:54 +0000

136 lines

New Thread

Privacy professional facing criminal charges

Privacy professional facing criminal charges

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:09:58 +0100

56 lines

New Thread

Proofs supplied for a SAR by a Third Party

Re: Proofs supplied for a SAR by a Third Party

Giles, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:33:49 -0000

157 lines

Re: Proofs supplied for a SAR by a Third Party

Carter, Antoinette (Global IS) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:43:00 -0000

748 lines

Re: Proofs supplied for a SAR by a Third Party

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:34:17 +0000

376 lines

Re: Proofs supplied for a SAR by a Third Party

Watts, Clare (C.) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:24:31 -0000

405 lines

Re: Proofs supplied for a SAR by a Third Party

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:00:02 +0000

162 lines

Proofs supplied for a SAR by a Third Party

Clare Watts <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:57:16 +0000

70 lines

New Thread

Reason for leaving - dismissal

Re: Reason for leaving - dismissal

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 14:12:21 +0000

40 lines

Re: Reason for leaving - dismissal

Healy, Susan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:41:48 -0000

53 lines

Re: Reason for leaving - dismissal

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:11:05 +0000

37 lines

Re: Reason for leaving - dismissal

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:24:05 +0000

206 lines

Re: Reason for leaving - dismissal

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:11:17 +0000

51 lines

Re: Reason for leaving - dismissal

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 11:02:22 -0000

185 lines

Re: Reason for leaving - dismissal

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:55:13 +0000

781 lines

Re: Reason for leaving - dismissal

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:39:48 -0000

469 lines

Re: Reason for leaving - dismissal

J.S.M.Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:46:18 -0000

61 lines

Re: Reason for leaving - dismissal

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 02:23:42 -0500

440 lines

Re: Reason for leaving - dismissal

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 18:25:43 +0000

213 lines

Reason for leaving - dismissal

Graeme Hawley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 17:42:44 +0000

58 lines

New Thread

Resources

Resources

Henley, Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:01:19 -0000

202 lines

New Thread

Retention of spoilt Birth/Death/Marriage Certificates

Retention of spoilt Birth/Death/Marriage Certificates

Gill Wood <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:40:59 +0000

43 lines

New Thread

Section 11 rights at work

Re: Section 11 rights at work

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:11:04 -0000

455 lines

Re: Section 11 rights at work

Peter Mead <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:54:16 -0000

551 lines

Re: Section 11 rights at work

Matthew Cooper <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:35:41 -0000

191 lines

Re: Section 11 rights at work

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:10:33 -0000

95 lines

Re: Section 11 rights at work

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:25:56 +0000

40 lines

Re: Section 11 rights at work

Matthew Cooper <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:14:02 -0000

781 lines

Re: Section 11 rights at work

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:09:57 -0000

101 lines

Re: Section 11 rights at work

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:07:11 -0000

292 lines

Section 11 rights at work

Carter, Antoinette (Global IS) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:39:51 -0000

155 lines

New Thread

Section 29 Exemptions

Re: Section 29 Exemptions

Chris Brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:27:57 -0000

172 lines

Re: Section 29 Exemptions

Simon Richardson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:26:40 +0000

144 lines

Section 29 Exemptions

Chris Brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 13:54:22 -0000

477 lines

New Thread

Seminar on Sensitive Data: Perceptions and Implications - 6 March 2009 (afternoon only)

Seminar on Sensitive Data: Perceptions and Implications - 6 March 2009 (afternoon only)

Peter Shepherd <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:16:57 -0000

410 lines

New Thread

Surveillance Society report

Surveillance Society report

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 11:24:54 -0000

34 lines

New Thread

Surveillance State

Re: Surveillance State

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 12:50:01 +0100

92 lines

Re: Surveillance State

Robert Streeter <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 17:39:19 +0000

32 lines

Surveillance State

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 11:42:27 +0000

47 lines

New Thread

UCU Requests for External Examiner Names and Institutions

Re: UCU Requests for External Examiner Names and Institutions

David Hirst <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:15:47 +0000

98 lines

New Thread

Vacancy - Information Management Officer

Vacancy - Information Management Officer

Leoni, Rudi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:39:49 +0000

69 lines

New Thread

When an SAR is not an SAR

Re: When an SAR is not an SAR

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:04:18 +0000

167 lines

Re: When an SAR is not an SAR

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:49:48 -0000

281 lines

Re: When an SAR is not an SAR

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:51:33 +0000

617 lines

Re: When an SAR is not an SAR

Simon Richardson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:03:08 +0000

223 lines

Re: When an SAR is not an SAR

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:47:16 +0000

414 lines

Re: When an SAR is not an SAR

Bradshaw, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:07:24 -0000

259 lines

Re: When an SAR is not an SAR

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:44:51 +0000

201 lines

Re: When an SAR is not an SAR

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:41:26 +0000

271 lines

Re: When an SAR is not an SAR

Simon Richardson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:28:07 +0000

38 lines

Re: When an SAR is not an SAR

chris pounder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:41:55 -0000

81 lines

Re: When an SAR is not an SAR

Simon Richardson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:35:35 +0000

79 lines

Re: When an SAR is not an SAR

Pat Walshe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:32:11 +0000

46 lines

Re: When an SAR is not an SAR

Jethro R Binks <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:10:57 +0000

41 lines

Re: When an SAR is not an SAR

Phil Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:01:16 +0000

69 lines

Re: When an SAR is not an SAR

Simon Richardson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:53:02 +0000

63 lines

Re: When an SAR is not an SAR

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:10:37 +0000

914 lines

Re: When an SAR is not an SAR

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:32:53 -0000

883 lines

When an SAR is not an SAR

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:11:40 +0000

393 lines

New Thread

[POSSIBLE SPAM] Government plans travel database

[POSSIBLE SPAM] Government plans travel database

Robert (Bob) Waixel <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:10:19 +0000

115 lines

JISCMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager