|
|
Size
|
'Sticky Crystals' on ccp4-wiki
|
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 22:55:29 +0100 |
190 lines |
14th Annual Structural Biology Symposium, March 27th, 2009
|
Fri, 6 Feb 2009 15:03:05 -0600 |
220 lines |
Announcement: TotalCryst school in Grenoble, April 1 -3, 2009
|
Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:33:30 +0000 |
36 lines |
another truncate question
|
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:07:31 -0500 |
29 lines |
Re: another truncate question
|
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:19:29 -0800 |
56 lines |
ARP/wARP and computer platforms
|
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 19:21:43 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: ARP/wARP and computer platforms
|
Sat, 21 Feb 2009 19:42:35 +0000 |
88 lines |
Barely one week remains to apply for RapiData, the BNL Course on Synchrotron Data Collection and Structure Solving.
|
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 06:14:23 -0500 |
63 lines |
Beam time available @ the NIGMS beam line at the NSLS
|
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:19:12 -0500 |
33 lines |
Beamline scientist and post-doctoral position available at the EMBL-Grenoble
|
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:35:37 +0100 |
161 lines |
BEAMTIME AT SLS X06DA
|
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:09:08 +0100 |
190 lines |
Beamtime at SLS X06SA - deadline: 15th Feb
|
Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:39:37 +0100 |
46 lines |
bent helix
|
Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:18:56 -0600 |
32 lines |
Re: brute force molecular replacement
|
Sun, 1 Feb 2009 08:47:51 -0800 |
244 lines |
Re: brute force molecular replacement
|
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:10:26 +0200 |
95 lines |
Re: brute force molecular replacement
|
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:13:28 +0100 |
288 lines |
Re: brute force molecular replacement
|
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:39:54 +0000 |
44 lines |
Re: brute force molecular replacement
|
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:45:23 +0100 |
183 lines |
Re: Caution - 120 Hz LCDs: Not CRT killers yet...
|
Sun, 1 Feb 2009 11:54:23 -0800 |
136 lines |
Re: Caution - 120 Hz LCDs: Not CRT killers yet...
|
Sun, 1 Feb 2009 15:14:04 -0800 |
65 lines |
ccp4 6.1.0 with macbookpro
|
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 18:52:36 -0600 |
35 lines |
Re: ccp4 6.1.0 with macbookpro
|
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 08:57:20 -0800 |
51 lines |
ccp4 install script
|
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:44:46 +0100 |
48 lines |
ccp4-6.1.1 for OS X (fink)
|
Sat, 7 Feb 2009 20:16:38 -0800 |
19 lines |
Re: ccp4-6.1.1 for OS X (fink)
|
Sat, 7 Feb 2009 21:55:53 -0800 |
26 lines |
Re: CCP4BB Digest - 12 Feb 2009 to 13 Feb 2009 (#2009-45)
|
Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:45:29 -0800 |
47 lines |
Re: CCP4BB Digest - 12 Feb 2009 to 13 Feb 2009 (#2009-45)
|
Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:31:55 -0800 |
143 lines |
Re: CCP4BB Digest - 12 Feb 2009 to 13 Feb 2009 (#2009-45)
|
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:07:38 +0000 |
153 lines |
Re: CCP4BB Digest - 12 Feb 2009 to 13 Feb 2009 (#2009-45)
|
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:36:20 +0000 |
85 lines |
Re: CCP4BB Digest - 8 Feb 2009 to 9 Feb 2009 (#2009-41)
|
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 19:18:23 -0800 |
70 lines |
Re: ccp4bb] refinment of mir anomalous data in MLPHARE
|
Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:18:38 +0100 |
44 lines |
Centramate
|
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:22:47 -0800 |
93 lines |
Choosing MR solutions in the case of perfect twinning with P41212?
|
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 11:10:00 -0700 |
65 lines |
Re: Choosing MR solutions in the case of perfect twinning with P41212?
|
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 18:57:47 +0000 |
82 lines |
Re: Choosing MR solutions in the case of perfect twinning with P41212?
|
Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:21:00 +0900 |
99 lines |
Re: Choosing MR solutions in the case of perfect twinning with P41212?
|
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:33:05 +0000 |
95 lines |
comparing cofactor/substrate binding site(s)
|
Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:18:11 +0100 |
67 lines |
comparison of maps, intensities and other basics
|
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:34:21 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: comparison of maps, intensities and other basics
|
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 14:51:15 -0800 |
101 lines |
Re: comparison of maps, intensities and other basics
|
Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:54:55 +0100 |
132 lines |
comparison of maps, intensities and other basics
|
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:34:21 +0100 |
41 lines |
Coot
|
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:22:30 +0100 |
31 lines |
Re: Coot
|
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:26:39 +0100 |
53 lines |
Coot Problem! adding r-nucleotide in DNA
|
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:04:48 +0100 |
54 lines |
Re: Coot Problem! adding r-nucleotide in DNA
|
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:20:46 -0500 |
67 lines |
Re: Coot Problem! adding r-nucleotide in DNA
|
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:24:43 +0100 |
88 lines |
correlation length - reloaded
|
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 01:28:27 -0800 |
467 lines |
Re: correlation length - reloaded
|
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:41:29 -0800 |
18 lines |
Re: correlation length - reloaded
|
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 22:21:35 -0000 |
663 lines |
Could I improve an inconsecutive experimental map?
|
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:11:46 -0600 |
94 lines |
Re: Could I improve an inconsecutive experimental map?
|
Sat, 21 Feb 2009 12:01:46 +0100 |
65 lines |
Re: Could I improve an inconsecutive experimental map?
|
Sat, 21 Feb 2009 08:30:18 -0600 |
149 lines |
Re: Could I improve an inconsecutive experimental map?
|
Sat, 21 Feb 2009 08:32:29 -0600 |
133 lines |
Re: Could I improve an inconsecutive experimental map?
|
Sat, 21 Feb 2009 23:48:26 +0900 |
118 lines |
Re: Could I improve an inconsecutive experimental map?
|
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:40:26 +0100 |
183 lines |
Re: Could I improve an inconsecutive experimental map? - more about completeness
|
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:38:07 +0100 |
26 lines |
deadline for beamtime proposals during April/May 2009 for BM14/ESRF 20th Feb. 2009
|
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:04:20 +0100 |
571 lines |
Default anisotropic B-factor refinement in phenix.refine?!
|
Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:01:34 +0100 |
161 lines |
Re: Default anisotropic B-factor refinement in phenix.refine?!
|
Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:24:48 -0800 |
223 lines |
Detector pitch, roll, yaw
|
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:16:40 +0100 |
30 lines |
Re: Detector pitch, roll, yaw
|
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:47:36 +0100 |
51 lines |
Re: Detector pitch, roll, yaw
|
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:24:19 +0100 |
93 lines |
Re: difficult MAD dataset
|
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:47:32 +0000 |
106 lines |
Re: difficult MAD dataset
|
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:50:02 +0100 |
60 lines |
Re: difficult MAD dataset
|
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:46:00 +0000 |
76 lines |
Drug Discovery Informatics Workshop, Oxford July 2009, Bursary awards available
|
Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:22:33 +0100 |
23 lines |
dry shipper & FedEx
|
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:32:48 +0100 |
204 lines |
Re: dry shipper & FedEx
|
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:53:35 -0500 |
126 lines |
educational opportunity: Difference between SIRAS and SAD?
|
Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:32:27 -0700 |
36 lines |
Re: educational opportunity: Difference between SIRAS and SAD?
|
Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:14:48 -0800 |
56 lines |
Re: educational opportunity: Difference between SIRAS and SAD?
|
Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:30:19 +0100 |
71 lines |
Re: educational opportunity: Difference between SIRAS and SAD?
|
Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:54:00 -0000 |
81 lines |
EMBL Beamline Scientist position at the BM14 beamline (ESRF, Grenoble, France)
|
Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:15:34 +0100 |
188 lines |
EMBO Practical Course on High Throughput Protein Production and Crystallization - Oxford, 17-25 June 2009
|
Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:08:18 +0000 |
24 lines |
Engineering Associate Position in Robotics + Miniaturization, University of Limerick, Ireland
|
Sun, 22 Feb 2009 10:19:42 -0000 |
381 lines |
error message on installation of ccp4i on linux red hat enterprise 5.0
|
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:16:38 -0500 |
88 lines |
Re: error message on installation of ccp4i on linux red hat enterprise 5.0
|
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 22:03:53 +0100 |
27 lines |
Re: error message on installation of ccp4i on linux red hat enterprise 5.0
|
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:09:07 -0500 |
88 lines |
expression of single chain variable fragment
|
Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:31:44 -0800 |
22 lines |
Re: expression of single chain variable fragment
|
Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:33:59 -0500 |
107 lines |
fink update
|
Thu, 12 Feb 2009 02:15:27 +0530 |
270 lines |
Re: fink update
|
Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:55:04 -0800 |
495 lines |
fink update
|
Thu, 12 Feb 2009 05:04:46 +0530 |
394 lines |
Re: fink update
|
Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:02:39 -0800 |
16 lines |
First Announcement: 7th International NCCR Symposium on New Trends in Structural Biology
|
Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:05:41 +0100 |
54 lines |
First Announcement: 7th International NCCR Symposium on New Trends in Structural Biology
|
Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:52:55 -0000 |
85 lines |
Re: Fobs - Fobs
|
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:19:52 +0000 |
35 lines |
Getting a copy of ESCET
|
Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:39:49 +0000 |
30 lines |
Re: Getting a copy of ESCET
|
Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:41:27 +0100 |
26 lines |
Getting Molprobity to run using WinCoot
|
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:05:55 +0000 |
31 lines |
Re: Getting Molprobity to run using WinCoot
|
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:06:39 +0000 |
61 lines |
Re: Google marks CCP4 web site as a potential security threat
|
Sun, 1 Feb 2009 21:14:28 +0000 |
50 lines |
Hi prep column from GE
|
Fri, 6 Feb 2009 17:26:30 -0500 |
23 lines |
Re: Hi prep column from GE
|
Sat, 7 Feb 2009 11:22:26 +0100 |
21 lines |
HKL2000
|
Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:52:47 -0600 |
20 lines |
Re: HKL2000
|
Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:56:40 -0600 |
74 lines |
How to chemically modify the side chain of Glu?
|
Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:07:13 +0800 |
47 lines |
how to show double conformation in PyMol
|
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:10:26 -0500 |
41 lines |
Re: how to show double conformation in PyMol
|
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:55:20 -0500 |
33 lines |
If you need a Stereo 3D-capable LCD today...
|
Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:21:24 -0800 |
61 lines |
Importance of low order reflections?
|
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:22:17 -0500 |
23 lines |
Re: Importance of low order reflections?
|
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:51:55 +0100 |
148 lines |
Re: Importance of low order reflections?
|
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:58:56 -0800 |
61 lines |
Re: Importance of low order reflections?
|
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:28:52 -0500 |
53 lines |
Re: Importance of low order reflections?
|
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:10:01 -0800 |
209 lines |
Re: Importance of low order reflections?
|
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 23:37:47 +0100 |
107 lines |
Re: Importance of low order reflections?
|
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:47:18 -0500 |
343 lines |
In-house X-ray systems: what is your experience
|
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:49:50 +0100 |
31 lines |
Re: In-house X-ray systems: what is your experience
|
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:37:10 +0000 |
55 lines |
include or exclude overloads
|
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:42:58 -0800 |
138 lines |
Issue on MOSFLM 7.0.4 with image collected on NOIR detector
|
Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:08:47 -0700 |
12528 lines |
Re: Issue on MOSFLM 7.0.4 with image collected on NOIR detector
|
Thu, 12 Feb 2009 23:08:05 +0000 |
129 lines |
leela shetty sent you a Friend Request on Yaari
|
Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:10:09 -0500 |
55 lines |
Re: leela shetty sent you a Friend Request on Yaari
|
Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:56:58 +0100 |
32 lines |
Looking for a free program for calculating powder diffraction pattern
|
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:58:19 -0800 |
31 lines |
Re: Looking for a free program for calculating powder diffraction pattern
|
Tue, 17 Feb 2009 07:47:49 +0100 |
36 lines |
Looking for a free program for calculating powder diffraction pattern
|
Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:41:26 +0000 |
22 lines |
Marie Curie Fellowship
|
Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:16:20 +0200 |
48 lines |
Fwd: more about low order reflections
|
Sat, 21 Feb 2009 14:30:45 -0500 |
50 lines |
moving the cofactor in model
|
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:26:35 +0000 |
12 lines |
Re: moving the cofactor in model
|
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:16:14 +0530 |
39 lines |
Re: moving the cofactor in model
|
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:27:50 +0000 |
19 lines |
MX-beamtime at BESSY-Berlin, period: July/2009 - June/2010, Deadline March 1, 2009
|
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:48:11 +0100 |
220 lines |
native gel
|
Fri, 13 Feb 2009 03:30:18 +0000 |
32 lines |
Re: native gel
|
Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:38:43 -0500 |
80 lines |
Re: native gel
|
Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:57:02 +0000 |
99 lines |
Re: NCS application in Coot, was Re: [ccp4bb] CCP4BB Digest - 8 Feb 2009 to 9 Feb 2009 (#2009-41)
|
Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:32:00 +0100 |
71 lines |
Neutron Protein Crystallography Call for Proposals
|
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:33:44 -0700 |
108 lines |
Obtaining relationships between two cross rotation solutions?
|
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:47:58 -0700 |
45 lines |
Re: Obtaining relationships between two cross rotation solutions?
|
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:31:50 -0800 |
53 lines |
Re: Obtaining relationships between two cross rotation solutions?
|
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:56:50 -0800 |
56 lines |
Re: Obtaining relationships between two cross rotation solutions?
|
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 21:08:09 -0600 |
73 lines |
Re: Obtaining relationships between two cross rotation solutions?
|
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 09:59:38 +0000 |
74 lines |
Occupancy Refinement
|
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:56:44 -0500 |
43 lines |
Off topic: 182 kDa protein is too large to crystallize
|
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 01:49:10 -0800 |
36 lines |
Re: Off topic: 182 kDa protein is too large to crystallize
|
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:34:00 +0100 |
68 lines |
Re: Off topic: 182 kDa protein is too large to crystallize
|
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:26:40 +0000 |
58 lines |
Re: Off topic: 182 kDa protein is too large to crystallize
|
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:09:32 -0500 |
30 lines |
Off topic: Coot and shared libraries
|
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:37:18 +0000 |
93 lines |
Re: Off topic: Coot and shared libraries
|
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:47:41 +0100 |
92 lines |
Re: Off topic: Coot and shared libraries
|
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:57:50 +0000 |
61 lines |
Re: Off topic: Coot and shared libraries
|
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:43:06 -0500 |
82 lines |
Off topic: Crystal degredation with age
|
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 14:11:03 -0500 |
37 lines |
Re: Off topic: Crystal degredation with age
|
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 11:48:47 -0800 |
85 lines |
Re: Off topic: Crystal degredation with age
|
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:05:25 -0800 |
185 lines |
Re: Off topic: Crystal degredation with age
|
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 14:35:26 -0600 |
116 lines |
Re: Off topic: Crystal degredation with age
|
Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:37:00 +0200 |
307 lines |
Re: Off topic: Crystal degredation with age
|
Fri, 6 Feb 2009 14:13:33 +0000 |
24 lines |
Re: Off topic: Crystal degredation with age
|
Fri, 6 Feb 2009 11:06:48 -0500 |
56 lines |
Re: Off topic: Crystal degredation with age
|
Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:12:49 -0800 |
81 lines |
Re: Off topic: Crystal degredation with age
|
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 17:31:37 +0000 |
70 lines |
Off topic: Mammalian gene expression in E. coli
|
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:48:29 -0500 |
78 lines |
Re: Off topic: Mammalian gene expression in E. coli
|
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:00:38 -0500 |
50 lines |
Re: Off topic: Mammalian gene expression in E. coli
|
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:22:10 -0500 |
138 lines |
Re: Off topic: Mammalian gene expression in E. coli
|
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:17:50 +0000 |
157 lines |
Re: Off topic: Mammalian gene expression in E. coli
|
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:26:16 +0100 |
216 lines |
Re: Off topic: Mammalian gene expression in E. coli
|
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:43:44 -0800 |
58 lines |
Re: Off topic: Mammalian gene expression in E. coli
|
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:09:50 -0500 |
101 lines |
Re: Off topic: Mammalian gene expression in E. coli
|
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:47:59 -0500 |
66 lines |
Re: Off topic: Mammalian gene expression in E. coli
|
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:05:06 +0530 |
295 lines |
Re: Off topic: Mammalian gene expression in E. coli
|
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:48:57 -0500 |
167 lines |
Re: Off topic: Mammalian gene expression in E. coli
|
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:01:20 -0500 |
192 lines |
Re: Off topic: Mammalian gene expression in E. coli
|
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:02:14 -0600 |
329 lines |
Re: Off topic: Mammalian gene expression in E. coli
|
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:45:18 -0800 |
21 lines |
Re: Off topic: Mammalian gene expression in E. coli
|
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:30:34 -0600 |
91 lines |
Re: Off topic: Mammalian gene expression in E. coli
|
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:27:13 -0500 |
322 lines |
Re: Off topic: Mammalian gene expression in E. coli
|
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:52:34 -0500 |
187 lines |
Re: Off topic: Mammalian gene expression in E. coli
|
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:02:02 -0500 |
210 lines |
Re: Off topic: Mammalian gene expression in E. coli
|
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:25:21 +0100 |
344 lines |
Re: Off topic: Mammalian gene expression in E. coli
|
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:31:04 -0500 |
274 lines |
Re: Off topic: Mammalian gene expression in E. coli
|
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:07:04 -0500 |
1382 lines |
Re: Off topic: Mammalian gene expression in E. coli
|
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:17:44 -0500 |
1705 lines |
Re: Off topic: Mammalian gene expression in E. coli
|
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:23:43 -0500 |
372 lines |
Re: Off topic: Mammalian gene expression in E. coli
|
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:57:08 -0500 |
400 lines |
Re: Off topic: Mammalian gene expression in E. coli
|
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:24:52 -0500 |
509 lines |
Re: Off topic: Mammalian gene expression in E. coli
|
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:00:19 -0500 |
35 lines |
Re: Off topic: Mammalian gene expression in E. coli
|
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:45:49 -0800 |
46 lines |
off-topic detergent hydrolysis?
|
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:06:02 -0800 |
58 lines |
Re: off-topic detergent hydrolysis?
|
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:58:05 -0500 |
343 lines |
Re: off-topic detergent hydrolysis?
|
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 06:51:34 -0500 |
110 lines |
Re: off-topic detergent hydrolysis?
|
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:15:03 +0000 |
6289 lines |
Off-topic: ligand enrichment
|
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:09:27 +0800 |
66 lines |
Re: Off-topic: ligand enrichment
|
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:33:11 -0500 |
48 lines |
Re: Off-topic: ligand enrichment
|
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:44:27 +0100 |
144 lines |
Re: Off-topic: ligand enrichment
|
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:38:55 +0900 |
41 lines |
Off-topic: Open Source / Freeware Binding Curve Fitting Software
|
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:43:20 -0600 |
113 lines |
Re: Off-topic: Open Source / Freeware Binding Curve Fitting Software
|
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 17:02:44 -0000 |
63 lines |
Re: Off-topic: Open Source / Freeware Binding Curve Fitting Software
|
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:03:44 -0800 |
48 lines |
Offtopic-ish: Ubuntu Laptop
|
Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:47:18 -0500 |
40 lines |
Re: Offtopic-ish: Ubuntu Laptop
|
Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:01:28 -0800 |
62 lines |
Re: Offtopic-ish: Ubuntu Laptop
|
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:51:13 +0530 |
72 lines |
Re: Offtopic-ish: Ubuntu Laptop
|
Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:54:49 -0500 |
72 lines |
Re: Offtopic-ish: Ubuntu Laptop
|
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:36:14 +0100 |
79 lines |
Re: Offtopic-ish: Ubuntu Laptop
|
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:59:42 +0000 |
109 lines |
Open Post-Doc and technician positions
|
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:26:31 +0100 |
669 lines |
OT: VectorNTI alternatives - SUMMARY
|
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:43:12 +0100 |
488 lines |
PDB protein strucutrues as screen saver
|
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:22:04 +0100 |
43 lines |
Re: PDB protein strucutrues as screen saver
|
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:37:05 +0100 |
55 lines |
Re: PDB protein strucutrues as screen saver
|
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:44:50 -0500 |
50 lines |
Re: PDB protein strucutrues as screen saver
|
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:56:51 -0600 |
22 lines |
Re: PDB protein strucutrues as screen saver
|
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:51:48 -0800 |
44 lines |
Re: PDB protein strucutrues as screen saver
|
Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:35:42 +0530 |
68 lines |
Re: PDB protein strucutrues as screen saver
|
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:42:56 -0800 |
72 lines |
Re: PDB protein strucutrues as screen saver
|
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:30:25 -0800 |
88 lines |
Re: PDB protein strucutrues as screen saver
|
Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:51:36 +0100 |
221 lines |
Re: PDB protein strucutrues as screen saver
|
Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:05:53 +0100 |
136 lines |
PEG3350-based cryoprotectant
|
Sat, 14 Feb 2009 21:15:11 -0500 |
145 lines |
Re: PEG3350-based cryoprotectant
|
Sun, 15 Feb 2009 07:17:04 +0530 |
88 lines |
Re: PEG3350-based cryoprotectant
|
Sat, 14 Feb 2009 23:22:57 -0500 |
108 lines |
Re: PEG3350-based cryoprotectant
|
Sun, 15 Feb 2009 00:42:15 -0500 |
49 lines |
Re: PEG3350-based cryoprotectant
|
Sun, 15 Feb 2009 11:20:08 +0100 |
53 lines |
Re: PEG3350-based cryoprotectant
|
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:16:41 +0100 |
608 lines |
phaser brute rotation function: how to output .rlist?
|
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:52:20 -0800 |
27 lines |
Re: phaser brute rotation function: how to output .rlist?
|
Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:52:02 +0000 |
54 lines |
PhD studentship at the University of Exeter
|
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:20:44 +0000 |
94 lines |
PhD studentship in Edinburgh
|
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:39:39 +0000 |
46 lines |
PHENIX & BSS refinement
|
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:42:34 +0100 |
86 lines |
Re: PHENIX & BSS refinement
|
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:07:18 -0800 |
47 lines |
Re: PHENIX & BSS refinement
|
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 17:24:02 +0100 |
63 lines |
Re: PHENIX & BSS refinement
|
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 09:23:38 -0800 |
37 lines |
Re: PHENIX & BSS refinement
|
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 19:40:48 +0100 |
86 lines |
Re: PHENIX & BSS refinement
|
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:47:38 -0800 |
28 lines |
PHIDM AND FOMDM from DM
|
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 21:43:02 -0800 |
28 lines |
Re: PHIDM AND FOMDM from DM
|
Fri, 6 Feb 2009 08:51:52 +0000 |
88 lines |
Re: PHIDM AND FOMDM from DM
|
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:47:00 +0000 |
34 lines |
Poor diffraction of eukaryotic membrane protein crystals
|
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 17:08:01 +1300 |
204 lines |
Re: Poor diffraction of eukaryotic membrane protein crystals
|
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 23:21:06 -0800 |
486 lines |
Poor diffraction of eukaryotic membrane protein crystals
|
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 17:08:01 +1300 |
204 lines |
Re: Poor diffraction of eukaryotic membrane protein crystals
|
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 23:21:06 -0800 |
486 lines |
Post-doc position available
|
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:11:43 -0500 |
158 lines |
Post-doctoral Position at WEHI, Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
|
Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:03:14 +1100 |
120 lines |
Post-doctoral positions at Columbia University, New York
|
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 00:38:58 +0000 |
39 lines |
Postdoc position in neutron protein crystallography
|
Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:39:01 -0700 |
40 lines |
postdoctoral fellow in membrane protein structure
|
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:12:13 -0700 |
72 lines |
Postdoctoral Fellow, Membrane Protein Structural Biology
|
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 14:49:20 -0800 |
256 lines |
Postdoctoral Fellow, Membrane protein structure at the ESRF
|
Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:27:18 +0100 |
340 lines |
Postdoctoral position at EMBL Grenoble
|
Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:42:29 +0100 |
103 lines |
Postdoctoral Position in Structural Biology
|
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 08:51:44 -0600 |
109 lines |
Postdoctoral position ISMB Birkbeck
|
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:09:54 +0000 |
146 lines |
Postdoctoral position on calcium channels in Vancouver, Canada
|
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:25:27 -0800 |
110 lines |
Postdoctoral positions at CSHL
|
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:36:11 -0500 |
121 lines |
problem with ccp4 6.1.0 installation
|
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:38:16 -0800 |
40 lines |
Re: problem with ccp4 6.1.0 installation
|
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:57:07 +0000 |
64 lines |
Protein crystallization
|
Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:53:49 +0800 |
69 lines |
protein folds
|
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:20:14 +0100 |
47 lines |
Re: protein folds
|
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:07:39 +0000 |
39 lines |
Re: protein folds
|
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 20:45:35 +0100 |
105 lines |
Re: protein folds
|
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:08:10 -0800 |
48 lines |
Re: protein folds
|
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:48:55 -0500 |
56 lines |
Re: protein folds
|
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:04:26 -0600 |
70 lines |
Re: protein folds
|
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:26:15 -0500 |
86 lines |
Re: protein folds
|
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:27:55 -0500 |
75 lines |
Re: protein folds
|
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:25:13 -0800 |
39 lines |
Re: protein folds
|
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:22:08 -0700 |
47 lines |
Re: protein folds
|
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:38:03 -0500 |
64 lines |
Re: protein folds
|
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:19:03 +0000 |
95 lines |
Re: protein folds
|
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:04:49 -0500 |
64 lines |
Re: protein folds
|
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:44:16 -0800 |
20 lines |
protocol for harvesting proteins from bacterial periplasmic space
|
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:52:54 -0800 |
15 lines |
Re: protocol for harvesting proteins from bacterial periplasmic space
|
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 19:20:51 -0500 |
41 lines |
Re: protocol for harvesting proteins from bacterial periplasmic space
|
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 19:33:56 -0500 |
81 lines |
Re: protocol for harvesting proteins from bacterial periplasmic space
|
Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:28:35 +0100 |
42 lines |
Re: protocol for harvesting proteins from bacterial periplasmic space
|
Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:05:22 -0500 |
54 lines |
Purification with ligand
|
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:58:06 -0500 |
36 lines |
Re: Purification with ligand
|
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:50:55 -0800 |
139 lines |
Re: Purification with ligand
|
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:55:19 -0500 |
369 lines |
putting in methionines for SeMet crystals
|
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:01:49 +0000 |
45 lines |
Re: putting in methionines for SeMet crystals
|
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:18:14 +0000 |
45 lines |
Re: putting in methionines for SeMet crystals
|
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:27:46 -0800 |
210 lines |
Re: putting in methionines for SeMet crystals
|
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:13:52 +0900 |
53 lines |
PyMOL: How to relax geometry constraints for cartoon mode/
|
Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:05:09 -0700 |
26 lines |
Re: PyMOL: How to relax geometry constraints for cartoon mode/
|
Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:33:40 +0100 |
55 lines |
Questions about (possibly) twinned data
|
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:11:30 -0500 |
177 lines |
Re: Questions about (possibly) twinned data
|
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:15:20 -0600 |
91 lines |
Re: Questions about (possibly) twinned data
|
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:39:46 -0500 |
286 lines |
Questions regarding Peptidoglycan-binding protein
|
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:53:12 -0500 |
64 lines |
Re: Questions regarding Peptidoglycan-binding protein
|
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:56:47 -0500 |
261 lines |
Re: Questions regarding Peptidoglycan-binding protein
|
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:39:56 -0500 |
410 lines |
radiation damage
|
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:43:34 -0800 |
88 lines |
Re: radiation damage
|
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 21:49:07 +0100 |
32 lines |
Re: radiation damage
|
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:45:37 -0800 |
46 lines |
Rational design of ligands
|
Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:01:04 -0500 |
28 lines |
Refinement
|
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:29:09 +0000 |
23 lines |
Re: Refinement
|
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:38:59 +0100 |
56 lines |
Re: Refinement
|
Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:06:52 +0000 |
36 lines |
Refinement: Basic questions
|
Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:45:48 -0800 |
37 lines |
Re: Refinement: Basic questions
|
Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:12:45 +0100 |
88 lines |
refinment of mir anomalous data in MLPHARE
|
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 04:05:56 +0000 |
54 lines |
Re: refinment of mir anomalous data in MLPHARE
|
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:56:11 +0000 |
65 lines |
Refmac5 - high res (1.2A) refinement problem
|
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:25:21 +0100 |
43 lines |
Re: Refmac5 - high res (1.2A) refinement problem
|
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:17:35 +0100 |
63 lines |
Re: Refmac5 - high res (1.2A) refinement problem
|
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:55:39 -0600 |
77 lines |
Refmac5 and dual conformation of a dual conformation
|
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 08:43:12 -0800 |
50 lines |
Re: Refmac5 and dual conformation of a dual conformation
|
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:09:44 -0800 |
76 lines |
reifine metal with phenix
|
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:39:47 -0500 |
38 lines |
Re: reifine metal with phenix
|
Tue, 17 Feb 2009 02:20:39 +0100 |
63 lines |
Re: reifine metal with phenix
|
Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:07:10 -0800 |
41 lines |
removal of dimer
|
Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:47:28 +0000 |
25 lines |
Re: removal of dimer
|
Wed, 18 Feb 2009 03:47:05 +0530 |
36 lines |
Re: removal of dimer
|
Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:36:34 +0530 |
104 lines |
Research positions in Tromsoe, Norway
|
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:42:43 +0100 |
58 lines |
restraints in refmac
|
Sat, 7 Feb 2009 14:09:40 -0500 |
26 lines |
Re: restraints in refmac
|
Sat, 7 Feb 2009 20:53:25 +0000 |
19 lines |
Rigid body refinement as last refinement?
|
Fri, 6 Feb 2009 06:58:24 -0800 |
27 lines |
Re: Rigid body refinement as last refinement?
|
Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:39:07 -0500 |
59 lines |
Re: Rigid body refinement as last refinement?
|
Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:34:55 +0100 |
165 lines |
Re: Rigid body refinement as last refinement?
|
Fri, 6 Feb 2009 07:26:38 -0800 |
33 lines |
Re: Rigid body refinement as last refinement?
|
Fri, 6 Feb 2009 08:13:29 -0800 |
32 lines |
Re: Rigid body refinement as last refinement?
|
Fri, 6 Feb 2009 08:23:49 -0800 |
63 lines |
Re: Rigid body refinement as last refinement?
|
Fri, 6 Feb 2009 18:07:24 +0000 |
105 lines |
Re: Rigid body refinement as last refinement?
|
Sat, 7 Feb 2009 12:13:45 +0200 |
26 lines |
SCALA failed message
|
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:56:16 -0800 |
60 lines |
Re: SCALA failed message
|
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:51:16 +0000 |
141 lines |
Re: SCALA failed message
|
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 08:35:58 -0800 |
77 lines |
scaling a SAD data set
|
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:32:11 -0500 |
26 lines |
Re: scaling a SAD data set
|
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 08:24:05 -0800 |
34 lines |
Scientific Programmer Position - EMBL Hamburg
|
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 14:55:57 +0100 |
71 lines |
Scientific Programmer Position - EMBL Hamburg
|
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 14:55:57 +0100 |
71 lines |
screensaver
|
Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:34:46 -0500 |
47 lines |
Re: screensaver
|
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:39:21 -0500 |
27 lines |
Re: screensaver [ or better yet, an automatically generated RSS feed]
|
Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:09:10 -0700 |
76 lines |
Se oxidation
|
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:27:20 +0000 |
54 lines |
Re: Se oxidation
|
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:47:40 -0500 |
133 lines |
Re: Se oxidation
|
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:02:07 -0800 |
38 lines |
Re: Se oxidation
|
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:02:13 -0800 |
116 lines |
Re: Se oxidation
|
Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:05:49 +0100 |
438 lines |
Re: Se oxidation
|
Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:20:57 +0000 |
134 lines |
Re: Se oxidation
|
Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:16:44 +0000 |
164 lines |
Second CCP4 workshop in USA,1st announcement
|
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:36:47 -0600 |
62 lines |
SLS non-PX Beamlines: Call for Proposals will be launched on 8 February
|
Fri, 6 Feb 2009 14:13:37 +0100 |
29 lines |
Re: small lines in diffraction pattern
|
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:40:57 -0600 |
587 lines |
song CRT Multiscan E540 monitor for stereo view
|
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:29:20 -0500 |
36 lines |
Re: song CRT Multiscan E540 monitor for stereo view
|
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:47:22 +0100 |
52 lines |
Re: song CRT Multiscan E540 monitor for stereo view
|
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:50:43 -0500 |
43 lines |
static linking of ccp4 libs
|
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:26:23 +0100 |
13052 lines |
Re: static linking of ccp4 libs
|
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:42:54 +0000 |
84 lines |
Re: static linking of ccp4 libs
|
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:57:20 +0000 |
12219 lines |
SUMMARY: Poor diffraction of eukaryotic membrane protein crystals
|
Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:34:07 +1300 |
278 lines |
Re: SUMMARY: Poor diffraction of eukaryotic membrane protein crystals
|
Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:39:25 +1300 |
131 lines |
TeachSG workshop Expertise in Macromolecular Structure Refinement in Prague April 3-4
|
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 21:47:03 +0100 |
310 lines |
TeachSG workshop Expertise in Macromolecular Structure Refinement in Prague April 3-4
|
Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:53:39 +0100 |
317 lines |
Technician position available at IMP - Vienna, AUSTRIA
|
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:59:10 +0100 |
42 lines |
Re: temperature after 30 minutes using microscopes ?
|
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 17:30:50 -0500 |
209 lines |
TLS Create/Edit module error erases project folder
|
Fri, 6 Feb 2009 07:30:57 -0800 |
35 lines |
Re: TLS Create/Edit module error erases project folder
|
Sat, 7 Feb 2009 22:21:55 -0000 |
49 lines |
Re: TLS Create/Edit module error erases project folder
|
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:43:41 -0800 |
90 lines |
TLS refinement in Refmac gets stuck
|
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:31:09 +0100 |
199 lines |
Re: TLS refinement in Refmac gets stuck
|
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:12:10 -0000 |
151 lines |
Re: TLS refinement in Refmac gets stuck
|
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:16:20 +0100 |
208 lines |
Re: TLS refinement in Refmac gets stuck
|
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:21:19 +0000 |
207 lines |
Re: TLS refinement in Refmac gets stuck
|
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:48:16 +0000 |
240 lines |
Re: TLS refinement in Refmac gets stuck
|
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:09:43 +0000 |
278 lines |
To identify specific type of interaction
|
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 04:32:35 -0800 |
44 lines |
Re: To identify specific type of interaction
|
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:48:10 +0000 |
44 lines |
tutorial / pipeline for ligand fitting, refinement?
|
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 15:27:37 +0000 |
18 lines |
Re: tutorial / pipeline for ligand fitting, refinement?
|
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:55:53 -0600 |
109 lines |
Re: tutorial / pipeline for ligand fitting, refinement?
|
Sun, 8 Feb 2009 00:59:19 +0000 |
23 lines |
Re: tutorial / pipeline for ligand fitting, refinement?
|
Sat, 7 Feb 2009 20:23:43 -0500 |
41 lines |
Twin refinement - selecting FreeR
|
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:32:53 +0100 |
57 lines |
Re: Twin refinement - selecting FreeR
|
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:40:08 +0000 |
91 lines |
Re: Twin refinement - selecting FreeR
|
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:32:20 -0800 |
57 lines |
Re: Twin refinement - selecting FreeR Q for Garib..
|
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:38:03 +0000 |
90 lines |
unit cell flags in mtz files and refmac
|
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:52:41 -0800 |
171 lines |
Re: unit cell flags in mtz files and refmac
|
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:02:55 -0800 |
228 lines |
Re: unit cell flags in mtz files and refmac
|
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:38:53 +0100 |
139 lines |
unknown density for a small molecule
|
Tue, 10 Feb 2009 00:23:54 -0500 |
5301 lines |
Re: unknown density for a small molecule
|
Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:08:56 +0200 |
290 lines |
Re: unknown density for a small molecule
|
Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:02:32 +0100 |
152 lines |
Re: unknown density for a small molecule
|
Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:16:39 -0500 |
44 lines |
Re: unknown density for a small molecule
|
Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:23:51 +0100 |
123 lines |
Re: unknown density for a small molecule
|
Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:37:22 -0500 |
7175 lines |
Re: unknown density for a small molecule
|
Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:32:43 -0600 |
375 lines |
Re: unknown density for a small molecule
|
Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:26:42 +0000 |
95 lines |
unstable refinement
|
Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:36:18 -0600 |
47 lines |
Re: unstable refinement
|
Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:41:10 -0600 |
158 lines |
Re: unstable refinement
|
Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:45:18 -0800 |
39 lines |
Re: unstable refinement
|
Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:14:38 +0000 |
112 lines |
Re: unstable refinement
|
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:02:08 -0000 |
85 lines |
Re: unstable refinement
|
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:23:37 +0100 |
89 lines |
Re: unstable refinement
|
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:21:45 -0000 |
204 lines |
Re: unstable refinement
|
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:15:01 -0800 |
591 lines |
Re: unstable refinement
|
Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:59:43 +0000 |
51 lines |
updated XDS binaries available
|
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:26:46 +0100 |
127 lines |
UV-transmissible plate seals 96-well format
|
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:24:56 +0100 |
25 lines |
Re: UV-transmissible plate seals 96-well format
|
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:40:48 -0800 |
42 lines |
Van der Waals Interaction Distances
|
Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:48:22 -0500 |
44 lines |
Re: Van der Waals Interaction Distances
|
Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:27:31 -0500 |
56 lines |
Re: Van der Waals Interaction Distances
|
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:57:28 +0100 |
369 lines |
Re: Van der Waals Interaction Distances
|
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:12:41 -0500 |
77 lines |
What can a learning student should post in our forum- are any restrictions for discussing science[what is science?] with intellectuals :)
|
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 01:15:53 +0100 |
73 lines |
Re: What can a learning student should post in our forum- are any restrictions for discussing science[what is science?] with intellectuals :)
|
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:57:56 +0000 |
43 lines |
Wilson B-factor from truncate
|
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:55:36 -0500 |
40 lines |
Re: Wilson B-factor from truncate
|
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:19:10 +0000 |
63 lines |
Re: X-ray photon correlation length
|
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:45:24 +0100 |
93 lines |
Re: X-ray photon correlation length
|
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:38:48 -0800 |
109 lines |
Re: X-ray photon correlation length
|
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:19:12 +0100 |
72 lines |
Fwd: [ccp4bb] dry shipper & FedEx
|
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:01:05 +0000 |
229 lines |