JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for FSL Archives


FSL Archives

FSL Archives


February 2009


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"standardised" fMRI tasks. (2 messages)
.nii volume to matlab format? (11 messages)
4th International Summer School in Biomedical Engineering - Brain connectivity and information transfer (1 message)
<No subject> (1 message)
a error when installing SGE in a exec hosts (10 messages)
About orthogonalization (2 messages)
Adding Covariates (3 messages)
Age X Sex Interaction (1 message)
ANN: MRI Scanner Technologist/Physicist, Reading UK (1 message)
Announcing the 2009 FSL & FreeSurfer Course : 12-16 June, San Francisco (2 messages)
Applying non-linear transforms from tbss_2_reg to other images (1 message)
Averaging of multiple B0 images (3 messages)
Averaging of multiple B0 images‏ (1 message)
Averaging two DTI runs (3 messages)
AW: [FSL] "standardised" fMRI tasks. (2 messages)
AW: [FSL] AW: [FSL] "standardised" fMRI tasks. (2 messages)
AW: [FSL] AW: [FSL] AW: [FSL] "standardised" fMRI tasks. (1 message)
Behavioural measures and BOLD correlations - Parametric modulation ? (4 messages)
Betsurf coordinate system (bug?) (7 messages)
Between Group Analysis - pre to post treatment (FLAME 1) (2 messages)
brain mask with BET -B (2 messages)
British Neuroscience Association Meeting: Deadline extended... (1 message)
Calculate SNR (2 messages)
Clarification on FEAT Group Comparison setup (7 messages)
Colour Bar Significance Values (1 message)
colour bars (1 message)
colour bars to indicate p and t values (2 messages)
Connectivity using FSL (6 messages)
Connectivity-based seed classification (4 messages)
convert 4d images to ascii (8 messages)
Convert SPM design matrix to FSL (1 message)
Correlation Questions (2 messages)
covariate within paired t-test; rank deficient problems (4 messages)
deproject error (4 messages)
DICOM to nifti + bvecs/bvals (1 message)
dti diffusion tensors template (2 messages)
DTI fieldmap (2 messages)
easythresh vs feat cluster thresholding (2 messages)
eddy current correction with spiral imaging (2 messages)
Effect size in TBSS (2 messages)
Error during third-level analysis (2 messages)
Faculty and Research Assistant Positions Available in Boston (1 message)
Fast GUI - Advanced Options : Standard to Input FLIRT transform field - ? (2 messages)
FAST without BET (7 messages)
faster options for melodic (2 messages)
FDT Registration error (6 messages)
FDT-bedpostx problems (16 messages)
FEAT results and ROI analysis (5 messages)
Feat version 5.92 versus 5.98 (2 messages)
Featquery - COPE v PE (6 messages)
Featquery - standard to native registration of mask images (2 messages)
feeds test failure on Ubuntu 8.04 (2 messages)
fill in holes? (3 messages)
FIRST segmentation (3 messages)
flirt (3 messages)
Flirt operation on a single voxel (4 messages)
flirt registration (4 messages)
FLIRT transform (2 messages)
flsview layout (6 messages)
FNIRT massive edge warp (4 messages)
FNIRT registration for high resolution images (3 messages)
fsl 4.0 deproject error (3 messages)
FSL <-> itk? (2 messages)
FSL course in San Francisco? (1 message)
fsl for ubuntu 8.10 (6 messages)
FSL in matlab (melodic) (4 messages)
fsl randomise: question about nonparametric cluster mass thresholding (10 messages)
FSL View overlay (2 messages)
FSL-VBM and similar diffusion analysis (1 message)
fslmaths -randn (2 messages)
fslmaths on 4D volume files (2 messages)
fslmeants and missing data (2 messages)
fslswapdim does not work properly (5 messages)
fslview bricon command-line option not working (5 messages)
FSLVIEW/FLIRT Error:: FslReadTimeSeries: voxel outside valid range (2 messages)
FUGUE parameters (5 messages)
GROUP MELODIC (3 messages)
handling 5D nifti files (2 messages)
Higher Level Analyses (2 messages)
image scaling (1 message)
Imaging Research Assistant Positions Available at NYU Child Study Center (1 message)
import ROI through text file (6 messages)
Incompatible Dimensions Exception (19 messages)
Incomplete 2x2x2-factorial design (1 message)
individual subject nuisance regressors (2 messages)
Installation problem with roundl (2 messages)
intensity normalization (2 messages)
Inverse transformation (1 message)
knee image and FLIRT (2 messages)
Masking (3 messages)
Masks from "cluster" program? (2 messages)
masks of Brodmann areas (5 messages)
MCFLIRT par file (4 messages)
Melodic Output - Further Group Analysis (1 message)
MELODIC post-stats/ (2 messages)
Melodic threshold values (4 messages)
melodic: IC number question (3 messages)
memory in FSL 4.1* (4 messages)
memory needs (4 messages)
mixed effects results in FSL -- conceptual problem (2 messages)
Mixed-effect Models (3 messages)
MNI subcortical structures atlas (2 messages)
mni->tlc, Lancaster transform (2 messages)
multi subject analysis with fixed effect (2 messages)
multiple t-tests (7 messages)
multiplying matrix for motion correction of Merged DW repetitions (2 messages)
Open Position for Post-doc at Stanford University (1 message)
Open Position for Research Assistant at Stanford University (1 message)
orientation (2 messages)
orthogonalization question (4 messages)
Orthogonalize EVs wrt Motion possible? (2 messages)
Overlay must have same dimension-- (6 messages)
overlay syntax (2 messages)
Percent signal change in standard space ROIs (2 messages)
percent signal change timecourse with featquery (5 messages)
Phase Unwrapping using fsl in linux (19 messages)
PhD Studentship (1 message)
Post hoc analysis of functional clusters (3 messages)
Post-doctoral position, high-field fMRI (1 message)
Postdoctoral Position Vacancy (1 message)
Postdoctoral Research Associate Position (1 message)
PPI setup (3 messages)
probabilistic tractography : why chose curvature threshold of 0.2? (1 message)
problem with patch for randomise_parallel? (5 messages)
problem with TBSS/tbss_3_postreg (6 messages)
Problems from a learner (4 messages)
probtrack NaN (2 messages)
Professional Research Assistant Position in laboratory of Dr. Marie T. Banich (1 message)
Professional Research Assistant Position in laboratory of Dr. Marie T. Banich (correction) (1 message)
programming language/tool/script that is compatible with fsl well under linux (10 messages)
Q: fslview -b range applied to multiple images at once? (4 messages)
Question about SIENA (2 messages)
Question about SIENA algorithm (1 message)
Question about the edge points motion quantification in SIENA (1 message)
Question for improving FIRST results (4 messages)
Queue not SGE but TORQUE (3 messages)
randomise (2 messages)
randomise and covariates (2 messages)
Re : [FSL] Colour Bar Significance Values (1 message)
Re : [FSL] colour bars (1 message)
Re : [FSL] FSL-VBM and similar diffusion analysis (1 message)
Re : [FSL] take a different mask in tbss / randomise (2 messages)
Re : [FSL] tbss_2_reg problem (3 messages)
registration (2 messages)
Repeated Measures ANOVA (3 messages)
Research Assistant Positions in Structural and Functional Neuroimaging (Boston) (1 message)
SENIOR POSTDOCTORAL POSITION (fMRI-DTI) ON ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AT TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN (1 message)
set output format (3 messages)
Siena basics (1 message)
SIENA Error (2 messages)
siena output (4 messages)
Siena register two structural images (2 messages)
Sienna register two structural images (2 messages)
significance questions (4 messages)
T1-weighted images and segmentation (6 messages)
take a different mask in tbss / randomise (1 message)
TBSS and FA statistic (5 messages)
TBSS for neonatal brain (8 messages)
tbss longitudinal (3 messages)
TBSS partial correlaion (1 message)
TBSS partial volume effects? (1 message)
tbss_2_reg problem (1 message)
tbss_3_preproc problem with best target (5 messages)
template for neonatal brain (2 messages)
temporal and spatial filtering - fslmaths -bptf -kernel (2 messages)
thresholding question (4 messages)
Transformation question (1 message)
ubuntu 8.04 dependencies problem (2 messages)
UCSD Postdoctoral Brain Imaging Fellowship Opportunity (1 message)
update on Incompatible Dimensions Exception error (3 messages)
using f test from first level analysis in second level analysis in FEAT (4 messages)
Vertex and Covariate analysis with first_utils (3 messages)
Warning in TBSS with confound regressor (5 messages)
Waypoints and termination masks; more questions (7 messages)
within subject correlations (4 messages)
wrong # args: should be "ecc_update_files w filename"? (2 messages)
zero filling dti images (3 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

FSL Home

FSL Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"standardised" fMRI tasks.

"standardised" fMRI tasks.

Andrew Janke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:32:01 +1100

47 lines

Re: "standardised" fMRI tasks.

Alexander J. Shackman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:51:53 -0600

147 lines

New Thread

.nii volume to matlab format?

.nii volume to matlab format?

Shabnam Hakimi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 17:02:28 +0000

24 lines

Re: .nii volume to matlab format?

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 17:18:47 +0000

39 lines

Re: .nii volume to matlab format?

Shabnam Hakimi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:21:16 -0800

88 lines

Re: .nii volume to matlab format?

siamak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 23:39:41 +0000

17 lines

Re: .nii volume to matlab format?

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:56:29 -0600

32 lines

Re: .nii volume to matlab format?

Andrew Janke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:01:19 +1100

31 lines

Re: .nii volume to matlab format?

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:16:29 +0100

125 lines

Re: .nii volume to matlab format?

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:36:04 +0000

82 lines

Re: .nii volume to matlab format?

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:55:13 +0000

47 lines

Re: .nii volume to matlab format?

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:20:29 -0600

381 lines

Re: .nii volume to matlab format?

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:24:56 +0000

108 lines

New Thread

4th International Summer School in Biomedical Engineering - Brain connectivity and information transfer

4th International Summer School in Biomedical Engineering - Brain connectivity and information transfer

Ting-Shuo Yo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:28:59 +0100

37 lines

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

xuebai <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 03:26:46 +0000

57 lines

New Thread

a error when installing SGE in a exec hosts

a error when installing SGE in a exec hosts

liang wang <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 16:10:24 -0800

68 lines

Re: a error when installing SGE in a exec hosts

David Flitney <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 12:42:43 +0000

61 lines

Re: a error when installing SGE in a exec hosts

liang wang <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 07:34:22 -0800

160 lines

Re: a error when installing SGE in a exec hosts

Andrew Janke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:13:13 +1100

25 lines

Re: a error when installing SGE in a exec hosts

liang wang <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:18:26 -0800

215 lines

Re: a error when installing SGE in a exec hosts

Andrew Janke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:23:57 +1100

42 lines

Re: a error when installing SGE in a exec hosts

liang wang <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:34:53 -0800

145 lines

Re: a error when installing SGE in a exec hosts

liang wang <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:07:31 -0800

205 lines

Re: a error when installing SGE in a exec hosts

Andrew Janke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:15:56 +1100

38 lines

Re: a error when installing SGE in a exec hosts

liang wang <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:36:15 -0800

126 lines

New Thread

About orthogonalization

About orthogonalization

Ning Liu <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:22:57 +0000

33 lines

Re: About orthogonalization

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 09:05:42 +0000

58 lines

New Thread

Adding Covariates

Re: Adding Covariates

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 10:49:56 +0000

59 lines

Re: Adding Covariates

Vina Goghari <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:00:03 -0600

69 lines

Re: Adding Covariates

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 23:13:01 +0000

94 lines

New Thread

Age X Sex Interaction

Re: Age X Sex Interaction

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 10:49:04 +0000

37 lines

New Thread

ANN: MRI Scanner Technologist/Physicist, Reading UK

ANN: MRI Scanner Technologist/Physicist, Reading UK

Tom Johnstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:04:15 +0000

50 lines

New Thread

Announcing the 2009 FSL & FreeSurfer Course : 12-16 June, San Francisco

Announcing the 2009 FSL & FreeSurfer Course : 12-16 June, San Francisco

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:13:59 +0000

34 lines

Re: Announcing the 2009 FSL & FreeSurfer Course : 12-16 June, San Francisco

Donald Nixdorf <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:29:11 -0600

43 lines

New Thread

Applying non-linear transforms from tbss_2_reg to other images

Re: Applying non-linear transforms from tbss_2_reg to other images

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 10:47:41 +0000

45 lines

New Thread

Averaging of multiple B0 images

Averaging of multiple B0 images

Johnny Zhuang <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:54:15 +0000

37 lines

Re: Averaging of multiple B0 images

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:27:30 +0000

60 lines

Re: Averaging of multiple B0 images

Pablo Velasco <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:34:09 +0000

74 lines

New Thread

Averaging of multiple B0 images&#8207;

Averaging of multiple B0 images&#8207;

Johnny Zhuang <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:01:02 +0000

32 lines

New Thread

Averaging two DTI runs

Averaging two DTI runs

Deryk Beal <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:15:00 +0000

18 lines

Re: Averaging two DTI runs

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:32:12 +0100

85 lines

Re: Averaging two DTI runs

Scott Kolbe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:03:48 +1100

88 lines

New Thread

AW: [FSL] "standardised" fMRI tasks.

AW: [FSL] "standardised" fMRI tasks.

Andreas Bartsch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:08:23 +0100

162 lines

Re: AW: [FSL] "standardised" fMRI tasks.

Andrew Janke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:41:27 +1100

32 lines

New Thread

AW: [FSL] AW: [FSL] "standardised" fMRI tasks.

AW: [FSL] AW: [FSL] "standardised" fMRI tasks.

Andreas Bartsch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:12:27 +0100

49 lines

Re: AW: [FSL] AW: [FSL] "standardised" fMRI tasks.

Andrew Janke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:28:23 +1100

43 lines

New Thread

AW: [FSL] AW: [FSL] AW: [FSL] "standardised" fMRI tasks.

AW: [FSL] AW: [FSL] AW: [FSL] "standardised" fMRI tasks.

Andreas Bartsch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:48:53 +0100

63 lines

New Thread

Behavioural measures and BOLD correlations - Parametric modulation ?

Behavioural measures and BOLD correlations - Parametric modulation ?

Govinda Poudel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 22:53:02 +1300

59 lines

Re: Behavioural measures and BOLD correlations - Parametric modulation ?

Mark Woolrich <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:13:40 +0000

68 lines

Re: Behavioural measures and BOLD correlations - Parametric modulation ?

Govinda Poudel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:42:19 +1300

155 lines

Re: Behavioural measures and BOLD correlations - Parametric modulation ?

Jack Grinband <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 01:49:32 +0000

46 lines

New Thread

Betsurf coordinate system (bug?)

Re: Betsurf coordinate system (bug?)

Marc Lalancette <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:05:47 +0000

81 lines

Re: Betsurf coordinate system (bug?)

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:23:33 +0000

102 lines

Re: Betsurf coordinate system (bug?)

Marc Lalancette <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:19:55 +0000

114 lines

Re: Betsurf coordinate system (bug?)

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 17:43:08 +0000

154 lines

Re: Betsurf coordinate system (bug?)

Marc Lalancette <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:24:03 +0000

170 lines

Re: Betsurf coordinate system (bug?)

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:40:02 +0000

197 lines

Re: Betsurf coordinate system (bug?)

Marc Lalancette <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 18:39:38 +0000

240 lines

New Thread

Between Group Analysis - pre to post treatment (FLAME 1)

Between Group Analysis - pre to post treatment (FLAME 1)

Christopher Culbertson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 20:49:28 +0000

83 lines

Re: Between Group Analysis - pre to post treatment (FLAME 1)

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:48:06 +0000

144 lines

New Thread

brain mask with BET -B

brain mask with BET -B

Daniel Reich <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:32:19 +0000

18 lines

Re: brain mask with BET -B

孟春 <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:26:47 +0800

79 lines

New Thread

British Neuroscience Association Meeting: Deadline extended...

British Neuroscience Association Meeting: Deadline extended...

Ramnani N <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:42:18 -0000

595 lines

New Thread

Calculate SNR

Calculate SNR

Zarrar Shehzad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:38:18 -0800

19 lines

Re: Calculate SNR

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:33:23 +0000

43 lines

New Thread

Clarification on FEAT Group Comparison setup

Clarification on FEAT Group Comparison setup

Carlos Faraco <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:31:03 +0000

53 lines

Re: Clarification on FEAT Group Comparison setup

Mark Woolrich <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:57:24 +0000

119 lines

Re: Clarification on FEAT Group Comparison setup

Carlos Faraco <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:49:12 +0000

58 lines

Re: Clarification on FEAT Group Comparison setup

Carlos Faraco <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 18:27:58 +0000

32 lines

Re: Clarification on FEAT Group Comparison setup

Mark Woolrich <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:22:09 +0000

150 lines

Re: Clarification on FEAT Group Comparison setup

Carlos Faraco <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:42:14 +0000

40 lines

Re: Clarification on FEAT Group Comparison setup

Carlos Faraco <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:35:32 +0000

27 lines

New Thread

Colour Bar Significance Values

Colour Bar Significance Values

Ronan Joseph Kelly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:43:30 +0000

57 lines

New Thread

colour bars

colour bars

Silvia Juanes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:34:58 +0000

18 lines

New Thread

colour bars to indicate p and t values

colour bars to indicate p and t values

Silvia Juanes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:50:15 +0100

38 lines

Re: colour bars to indicate p and t values

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:51:17 +0000

36 lines

New Thread

Connectivity using FSL

Connectivity using FSL

William Sohn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:18:08 +0000

50 lines

Re: Connectivity using FSL

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:31:31 +0000

126 lines

Re: Connectivity using FSL

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:33:40 +0100

174 lines

Re: Connectivity using FSL

David V. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:45:24 -0500

75 lines

Re: Connectivity using FSL

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:49:27 +0000

233 lines

Re: Connectivity using FSL

Eugene Duff <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:53:52 +0000

156 lines

New Thread

Connectivity-based seed classification

Connectivity-based seed classification

Catherine Traynor <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:26:44 +0000

24 lines

Re: Connectivity-based seed classification

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 09:42:54 +0000

47 lines

Re: Connectivity-based seed classification

Catherine Traynor <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:09:15 +0000

56 lines

Re: Connectivity-based seed classification

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:49:49 +0000

74 lines

New Thread

convert 4d images to ascii

convert 4d images to ascii

Enzo Tagliazucchi <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 03:04:48 +0000

20 lines

Re: convert 4d images to ascii

Michael T Rubens <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 20:58:00 -0800

121 lines

Re: convert 4d images to ascii

David Gutman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 00:01:09 -0500

36 lines

Re: convert 4d images to ascii

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 22:03:46 +0000

54 lines

Re: convert 4d images to ascii

Enzo Tagliazucchi <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 00:52:42 +0000

20 lines

Re: convert 4d images to ascii

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 02:06:17 +0100

66 lines

Re: convert 4d images to ascii

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 07:41:41 +0000

44 lines

Re: convert 4d images to ascii

Enzo Tagliazucchi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 04:22:23 +0000

25 lines

New Thread

Convert SPM design matrix to FSL

Convert SPM design matrix to FSL

Jason Steffener <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:28:40 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

Correlation Questions

Correlation Questions

David Shirinyan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 22:56:20 +0000

61 lines

Re: Correlation Questions

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 17:02:41 +0000

88 lines

New Thread

covariate within paired t-test; rank deficient problems

covariate within paired t-test; rank deficient problems

Joe Galea <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 22:42:58 +0000

30 lines

Re: covariate within paired t-test; rank deficient problems

Eugene Duff <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 23:19:41 +0000

114 lines

Re: covariate within paired t-test; rank deficient problems

JOSEPH GALEA <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 18:34:07 -0500

76 lines

Re: covariate within paired t-test; rank deficient problems

Eugene Duff <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 23:44:49 +0000

198 lines

New Thread

deproject error

deproject error

Naama Barnea-Goraly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:37:38 -0800

53 lines

Re: deproject error

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 10:05:55 +0000

78 lines

Re: deproject error

Naama Barnea-Goraly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:13:06 -0800

108 lines

Re: deproject error

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:35:25 +0000

117 lines

New Thread

DICOM to nifti + bvecs/bvals

Re: DICOM to nifti + bvecs/bvals

Mi Jung Kim <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 22:00:05 +0000

13 lines

New Thread

dti diffusion tensors template

dti diffusion tensors template

Fabio Meneghini <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:55:28 +0000

17 lines

Re: dti diffusion tensors template

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:01:01 +0000

52 lines

New Thread

DTI fieldmap

DTI fieldmap

Jeremy Young <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:01:48 -0500

21 lines

Re: DTI fieldmap

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:54:49 -0600

38 lines

New Thread

easythresh vs feat cluster thresholding

Re: easythresh vs feat cluster thresholding

David Shirinyan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:48:30 +0000

21 lines

Re: easythresh vs feat cluster thresholding

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:00:42 +0000

47 lines

New Thread

eddy current correction with spiral imaging

eddy current correction with spiral imaging

Mazerolle, Erin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:37:30 -0500

130 lines

Re: eddy current correction with spiral imaging

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:42:33 +0000

42 lines

New Thread

Effect size in TBSS

Effect size in TBSS

Agnieszka Burzynska <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 17:20:26 +0100

30 lines

Re: Effect size in TBSS

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 17:28:21 +0000

59 lines

New Thread

Error during third-level analysis

Error during third-level analysis

Claudia Preuschhof <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 19:08:04 +0000

97 lines

Re: Error during third-level analysis

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:44:57 +0000

114 lines

New Thread

Faculty and Research Assistant Positions Available in Boston

Faculty and Research Assistant Positions Available in Boston

David Salat <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 17:23:19 -0500

83 lines

New Thread

Fast GUI - Advanced Options : Standard to Input FLIRT transform field - ?

Fast GUI - Advanced Options : Standard to Input FLIRT transform field - ?

Jayanth Kolar <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:38:29 -0600

33 lines

Re: Fast GUI - Advanced Options : Standard to Input FLIRT transform field - ?

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:10:53 +0000

57 lines

New Thread

FAST without BET

FAST without BET

Lucas Eggert <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:21:49 +0100

32 lines

Re: FAST without BET

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:35:21 +0000

60 lines

Re: FAST without BET

Lucas Eggert <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:07:35 +0100

82 lines

Re: FAST without BET

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:25:47 -0600

72 lines

Re: FAST without BET

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:28:52 +0000

93 lines

Re: FAST without BET

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:31:19 +0000

109 lines

Re: FAST without BET

Brian Patenaude <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:23:01 -0000

116 lines

New Thread

faster options for melodic

faster options for melodic

Michael T Rubens <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:22:53 -0800

53 lines

Re: faster options for melodic

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:42:40 +0000

56 lines

New Thread

FDT Registration error

FDT Registration error

Lindgren, Kristen, Ann <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 12:56:55 -0500

22 lines

Re: FDT Registration error

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 19:20:01 +0100

97 lines

Re: FDT Registration error

Lindgren, Kristen, Ann <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:43:58 -0500

88 lines

Re: FDT Registration error

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 14:22:27 -0600

94 lines

Re: FDT Registration error

Lindgren, Kristen, Ann <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 15:31:28 -0500

137 lines

Re: FDT Registration error

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 15:25:21 -0600

164 lines

New Thread

FDT-bedpostx problems

FDT-bedpostx problems

Rajeet Saluja <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:45:40 +0000

101 lines

Re: FDT-bedpostx problems

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:26:28 +0100

258 lines

Re: FDT-bedpostx problems

Rajeet Saluja <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:23:51 +0000

358 lines

Re: FDT-bedpostx problems

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:53:17 +0100

848 lines

Re: FDT-bedpostx problems

Rajeet Saluja <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:42:29 +0000

513 lines

Re: FDT-bedpostx problems

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 20:51:38 +0100

1019 lines

Re: FDT-bedpostx problems

Michael Hanke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 22:09:14 +0100

37 lines

Re: FDT-bedpostx problems

Michael Hanke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 22:12:38 +0100

31 lines

Re: FDT-bedpostx problems

Rajeet Saluja <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:25:21 +0000

56 lines

Re: FDT-bedpostx problems

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:50:03 -0600

69 lines

Re: FDT-bedpostx problems

Michael Hanke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:27:15 +0100

75 lines

Re: FDT-bedpostx problems

Rajeet Saluja <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:46:38 +0000

97 lines

Re: FDT-bedpostx problems

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:03:31 +0100

282 lines

Re: FDT-bedpostx problems

Rajeet Saluja <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:44:59 +0000

178 lines

Re: FDT-bedpostx problems

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:20:10 +0100

394 lines

Re: FDT-bedpostx problems

Rajeet Saluja <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:32:16 +0000

12 lines

New Thread

FEAT results and ROI analysis

Re: FEAT results and ROI analysis

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:29:19 +0000

134 lines

Re: FEAT results and ROI analysis

Lin Nga <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 22:26:03 +0000

244 lines

Re: FEAT results and ROI analysis

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:11:48 +0000

90 lines

Re: FEAT results and ROI analysis

Lin Nga <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 17:29:51 +0000

47 lines

Re: FEAT results and ROI analysis

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:24:31 +0000

77 lines

New Thread

Feat version 5.92 versus 5.98

Feat version 5.92 versus 5.98

John Herrington <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:15:22 +0000

20 lines

Re: Feat version 5.92 versus 5.98

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:31:31 +0000

45 lines

New Thread

Featquery - COPE v PE

Featquery - COPE v PE

Daniel Shaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:00:49 +0000

31 lines

Re: Featquery - COPE v PE

Nestor, Liam (Contractor) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:42:50 -0800

85 lines

Re: Featquery - COPE v PE

Daniel Shaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:47:44 +0000

311 lines

Re: Featquery - COPE v PE

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:53:11 +0000

153 lines

Re: Featquery - COPE v PE

Greg Burgess <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:27:31 +0000

182 lines

Re: Featquery - COPE v PE

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:17:02 +0000

205 lines

New Thread

Featquery - standard to native registration of mask images

Featquery - standard to native registration of mask images

Daniel Shaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 11:57:58 +0000

43 lines

Re: Featquery - standard to native registration of mask images

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 07:28:27 +0000

80 lines

New Thread

feeds test failure on Ubuntu 8.04

feeds test failure on Ubuntu 8.04

Silviu Podariu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:52:08 +0000

135 lines

Re: feeds test failure on Ubuntu 8.04

Michael Hanke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:07:59 +0100

143 lines

New Thread

fill in holes?

fill in holes?

Kyle Kern <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 00:36:09 +0000

18 lines

Re: fill in holes?

Dianne Patterson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:56:35 -0700

82 lines

Re: fill in holes?

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:34:59 +0000

89 lines

New Thread

FIRST segmentation

FIRST segmentation

siamak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 23:06:49 +0000

33 lines

Re: FIRST segmentation

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 08:42:21 +0000

55 lines

Re: FIRST segmentation

siamak <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:40:59 +0000

21 lines

New Thread

flirt

flirt

siamak <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 00:11:26 +0000

23 lines

Re: flirt

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 23:28:07 +0000

51 lines

Re: flirt

siamak <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:53:04 +0000

31 lines

New Thread

Flirt operation on a single voxel

Flirt operation on a single voxel

Xiuyuan Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 16:43:57 -0500

39 lines

Re: Flirt operation on a single voxel

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 22:13:28 +0000

34 lines

Re: Flirt operation on a single voxel

Hugh Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 00:30:00 +0000

24 lines

Re: Flirt operation on a single voxel

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:42:32 +0000

40 lines

New Thread

flirt registration

flirt registration

Siddharth Srivastava <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:00:56 -0800

42 lines

Re: flirt registration

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 10:07:09 +0000

46 lines

Re: flirt registration

Rolf Heckemann <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 10:41:49 +0000

68 lines

Re: flirt registration

Siddharth Srivastava <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 10:02:29 -0800

137 lines

New Thread

FLIRT transform

FLIRT transform

Joe Galea <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 20:27:33 +0000

27 lines

Re: FLIRT transform

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 10:03:22 +0000

57 lines

New Thread

flsview layout

flsview layout

Michael Rohan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:24:31 +0000

20 lines

Re: flsview layout

David Flitney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:09:44 +0000

31 lines

Re: flsview layout

John Colby <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:27:01 +0000

110 lines

Re: flsview layout

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:32:43 +0000

82 lines

Re: flsview layout

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:37:53 +0000

56 lines

Re: flsview layout

wolf zinke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:33:22 +0100

806 lines

New Thread

FNIRT massive edge warp

FNIRT massive edge warp

G. Homola <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 23:58:48 +0100

27 lines

Re: FNIRT massive edge warp

Jesper Andersson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:19:47 +0100

43 lines

Re: FNIRT massive edge warp

G. Homola <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:00:00 +0100

59 lines

Re: FNIRT massive edge warp

Jesper Andersson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:21:11 -0000

77 lines

New Thread

FNIRT registration for high resolution images

FNIRT registration for high resolution images

Jayanth Kolar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:32:16 -0600

94 lines

Re: FNIRT registration for high resolution images

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:20:38 -0600

114 lines

Re: FNIRT registration for high resolution images

Jesper Andersson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:09:17 -0000

123 lines

New Thread

fsl 4.0 deproject error

fsl 4.0 deproject error

SUBSCRIBE FSL Anonymous <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 00:31:33 +0000

159 lines

Re: fsl 4.0 deproject error

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:49:15 +0000

189 lines

Re: fsl 4.0 deproject error

SUBSCRIBE FSL Anonymous <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 21:31:11 +0000

29 lines

New Thread

FSL <-> itk?

FSL <-> itk?

Oliver Trebbe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 21:35:31 +0100

27 lines

Re: FSL <-> itk?

Martin Kavec <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 21:56:35 +0100

35 lines

New Thread

FSL course in San Francisco?

FSL course in San Francisco?

Estephan Moana <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:45:03 +0000

18 lines

New Thread

fsl for ubuntu 8.10

fsl for ubuntu 8.10

Kim Chi Nguyen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:27:10 -0800

152 lines

Re: fsl for ubuntu 8.10

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:43:58 -0600

276 lines

Re: fsl for ubuntu 8.10

Feng Xue <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:57:14 +0800

49 lines

Re: fsl for ubuntu 8.10

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 23:09:24 -0600

109 lines

Re: fsl for ubuntu 8.10

Michael Hanke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 06:26:19 +0100

28 lines

Re: fsl for ubuntu 8.10

Feng Xue <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:35:59 +0800

75 lines

New Thread

FSL in matlab (melodic)

FSL in matlab (melodic)

Michael T Rubens <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 02:34:41 -0800

102 lines

Re: FSL in matlab (melodic)

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:41:42 +0000

83 lines

Re: FSL in matlab (melodic)

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:46:53 +0000

101 lines

Re: FSL in matlab (melodic)

Michael T Rubens <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:51:52 -0800

241 lines

New Thread

fsl randomise: question about nonparametric cluster mass thresholding

fsl randomise: question about nonparametric cluster mass thresholding

Alexander J. Shackman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 12:28:14 -0600

108 lines

Re: fsl randomise: question about nonparametric cluster mass thresholding

Reza Salimi <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 18:57:29 +0000

198 lines

Re: fsl randomise: question about nonparametric cluster mass thresholding

Alexander J. Shackman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:30:35 -0600

112 lines

Re: fsl randomise: question about nonparametric cluster mass thresholding

Reza Salimi <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 20:16:46 +0000

199 lines

Re: fsl randomise: question about nonparametric cluster mass thresholding

Reza Salimi <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 20:19:42 +0000

252 lines

Re: fsl randomise: question about nonparametric cluster mass thresholding

Alexander J. Shackman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 14:39:17 -0600

288 lines

Re: fsl randomise: question about nonparametric cluster mass thresholding

Reza Salimi <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 20:54:24 +0000

337 lines

Re: fsl randomise: question about nonparametric cluster mass thresholding

Alexander J. Shackman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 14:57:21 -0600

405 lines

Re: fsl randomise: question about nonparametric cluster mass thresholding

Alexander J. Shackman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 16:21:57 -0600

475 lines

Re: fsl randomise: question about nonparametric cluster mass thresholding

Reza Salimi <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 22:38:56 +0000

542 lines

New Thread

FSL View overlay

FSL View overlay

Kelly Westlake <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 21:14:02 +0000

22 lines

Re: FSL View overlay

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:51:43 +0000

44 lines

New Thread

FSL-VBM and similar diffusion analysis

FSL-VBM and similar diffusion analysis

Silviu Podariu <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:22:11 +0000

43 lines

New Thread

fslmaths -randn

fslmaths -randn

Jeanette Mumford <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:37:54 -0800

48 lines

Re: fslmaths -randn

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:27:23 +0000

53 lines

New Thread

fslmaths on 4D volume files

fslmaths on 4D volume files

Anastasia A Ford <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:56:15 +0000

27 lines

Re: fslmaths on 4D volume files

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:06:53 -0600

39 lines

New Thread

fslmeants and missing data

fslmeants and missing data

Matthew Hoptman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:40:40 +0000

17 lines

Re: fslmeants and missing data

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:54:03 +0000

36 lines

New Thread

fslswapdim does not work properly

fslswapdim does not work properly

dfwang <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 18:26:31 +0800

22 lines

Re: fslswapdim does not work properly

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 11:01:56 +0000

35 lines

Re: fslswapdim does not work properly

dfwang <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:45:35 +0800

48 lines

Re: fslswapdim does not work properly

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:45:16 +0100

139 lines

Re: fslswapdim does not work properly

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:03:48 +0000

109 lines

New Thread

fslview bricon command-line option not working

fslview bricon command-line option not working

Rajeev Raizada <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:39:51 +0000

27 lines

Re: fslview bricon command-line option not working

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:59:26 +0000

45 lines

Re: fslview bricon command-line option not working

Rajeev Raizada <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:41:44 +0000

36 lines

Re: fslview bricon command-line option not working

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:51:46 +0000

53 lines

Re: fslview bricon command-line option not working

Rajeev Raizada <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:27:08 +0000

27 lines

New Thread

FSLVIEW/FLIRT Error:: FslReadTimeSeries: voxel outside valid range

FSLVIEW/FLIRT Error:: FslReadTimeSeries: voxel outside valid range

Chris Petkov <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:18:11 +0000

30 lines

Re: FSLVIEW/FLIRT Error:: FslReadTimeSeries: voxel outside valid range

David Flitney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:13:57 +0000

51 lines

New Thread

FUGUE parameters

FUGUE parameters

siamak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:24:02 +0000

26 lines

Re: FUGUE parameters

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:25:30 +0000

45 lines

Re: FUGUE parameters

siamak <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:57:18 +0000

18 lines

Re: FUGUE parameters

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 22:03:33 +0000

39 lines

Re: FUGUE parameters

siamak <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:11:08 +0000

17 lines

New Thread

GROUP MELODIC

GROUP MELODIC

Elisabeth Jonckers <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 09:29:11 +0000

60 lines

Re: GROUP MELODIC

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:54:11 +0000

111 lines

Re: GROUP MELODIC

Elisabeth Jonckers <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:15:50 +0000

31 lines

New Thread

handling 5D nifti files

handling 5D nifti files

Jee Eun Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:46:48 -0600

37 lines

Re: handling 5D nifti files

Souheil Inati <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:54:17 -0500

140 lines

New Thread

Higher Level Analyses

Higher Level Analyses

Vina Goghari <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:16:45 -0600

20 lines

Re: Higher Level Analyses

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:35:46 +0000

45 lines

New Thread

image scaling

Re: image scaling

Veronique Weser <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:55:43 -0800

423 lines

New Thread

Imaging Research Assistant Positions Available at NYU Child Study Center

Imaging Research Assistant Positions Available at NYU Child Study Center

Michael P. Milham <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 18:25:31 +0000

51 lines

New Thread

import ROI through text file

import ROI through text file

Michael Scheel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:32:07 -0800

16 lines

Re: import ROI through text file

Benny Liberg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 08:47:01 +0100

44 lines

Re: import ROI through text file

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 08:47:38 +0000

40 lines

Re: import ROI through text file

Michael Scheel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:22:51 -0800

49 lines

Re: import ROI through text file

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:29:39 -0600

117 lines

Re: import ROI through text file

Michael Scheel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:01:13 -0800

129 lines

New Thread

Incompatible Dimensions Exception

Incompatible Dimensions Exception

Cibu <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:08:16 -0500

192 lines

Re: Incompatible Dimensions Exception

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:19:27 +0100

128 lines

Re: Incompatible Dimensions Exception

Jürgen Hänggi <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:30:57 +0100

154 lines

Re: Incompatible Dimensions Exception

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 13:44:55 -0600

346 lines

Re: Incompatible Dimensions Exception

Cibu <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:20:13 -0500

413 lines

Re: Incompatible Dimensions Exception

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 23:05:04 +0100

156 lines

Re: Incompatible Dimensions Exception

Jürgen Hänggi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:22:24 +0100

281 lines

Re: Incompatible Dimensions Exception

Cibu Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:55:07 -0500

124 lines

Re: Incompatible Dimensions Exception

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:51:15 -0600

139 lines

Re: Incompatible Dimensions Exception

Cibu <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:13:55 -0500

152 lines

Re: Incompatible Dimensions Exception

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 20:19:35 +0100

375 lines

Re: Incompatible Dimensions Exception

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 23:39:41 +0000

176 lines

Re: Incompatible Dimensions Exception

Cibu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:20:09 -0500

691 lines

Re: Incompatible Dimensions Exception

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 17:59:56 +0100

629 lines

Re: Incompatible Dimensions Exception

Cibu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:51:39 -0500

192 lines

Re: Incompatible Dimensions Exception

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 18:15:49 +0000

97 lines

Re: Incompatible Dimensions Exception

Cibu <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:14:17 -0500

51 lines

Re: Incompatible Dimensions Exception

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 17:09:31 +0000

77 lines

Re: Incompatible Dimensions Exception

Cibu <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:58:20 -0500

92 lines

New Thread

Incomplete 2x2x2-factorial design

Re: Incomplete 2x2x2-factorial design

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:44:10 +0000

138 lines

New Thread

individual subject nuisance regressors

individual subject nuisance regressors

Todd Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:18:50 -0500

37 lines

Re: individual subject nuisance regressors

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:55:53 +0000

56 lines

New Thread

Installation problem with roundl

Installation problem with roundl

Rafael Marco de Lucas <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:01:34 +0100

37 lines

Re: Installation problem with roundl

David Flitney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:33:08 +0000

51 lines

New Thread

intensity normalization

intensity normalization

WangPing <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 10:30:27 +0800

66 lines

Re: intensity normalization

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 10:08:46 +0000

54 lines

New Thread

Inverse transformation

Inverse transformation

Erlend Hodneland <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:10:39 +0000

34 lines

New Thread

knee image and FLIRT

knee image and FLIRT

Mi Jung Kim <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 18:53:18 +0000

450 lines

Re: knee image and FLIRT

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:43:09 +0000

73 lines

New Thread

Masking

Masking

Lisa Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:33:49 +0000

47 lines

Re: Masking

Benny Liberg <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 10:46:39 +0100

127 lines

Re: Masking

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:59:01 +0000

88 lines

New Thread

Masks from "cluster" program?

Masks from "cluster" program?

Benny Liberg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 20:38:04 +0000

19 lines

Re: Masks from "cluster" program?

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:25:38 +0000

38 lines

New Thread

masks of Brodmann areas

masks of Brodmann areas

Silvia Juanes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 13:50:56 +0100

41 lines

Re: masks of Brodmann areas

Michael T Rubens <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:04:57 -0800

72 lines

Re: masks of Brodmann areas

Silvia Juanes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:38:14 +0100

85 lines

Re: masks of Brodmann areas

Benny Liberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:33:09 +0100

73 lines

Re: masks of Brodmann areas

Silvia Juanes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 17:40:51 +0000

18 lines

New Thread

MCFLIRT par file

MCFLIRT par file

Satrajit Ghosh <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 17:33:42 -0500

26 lines

Re: MCFLIRT par file

Xinian Zuo <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 18:57:24 +0000

10 lines

Re: MCFLIRT par file

Satrajit Ghosh <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 20:09:56 -0500

29 lines

Re: MCFLIRT par file

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:00:50 +0000

42 lines

New Thread

Melodic Output - Further Group Analysis

Melodic Output - Further Group Analysis

Eva Kenny <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:52:48 +0000

45 lines

New Thread

MELODIC post-stats/

MELODIC post-stats/

Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 21:16:48 +0000

29 lines

Re: MELODIC post-stats/

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:29:30 +0000

63 lines

New Thread

Melodic threshold values

Melodic threshold values

Gael Varoquaux <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:26:52 +0100

28 lines

Re: Melodic threshold values

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 19:13:28 +0000

72 lines

Re: Melodic threshold values

Gael Varoquaux <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:43:46 +0100

67 lines

Re: Melodic threshold values

Gael Varoquaux <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:50:27 +0100

80 lines

New Thread

melodic: IC number question

melodic: IC number question

孟春 <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:07:41 +0800

47 lines

Re: melodic: IC number question

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:13:40 +0000

46 lines

Re: melodic: IC number question

Xuelin Cui <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:34:26 +0300

111 lines

New Thread

memory in FSL 4.1*

memory in FSL 4.1*

Mareike Menz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:40:25 +0100

38 lines

Re: memory in FSL 4.1*

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:36:43 +0000

85 lines

Re: memory in FSL 4.1*

Mareike Menz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:50:00 +0100

64 lines

Re: memory in FSL 4.1*

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:57:20 +0000

145 lines

New Thread

memory needs

memory needs

Chuck Theobald <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:00:15 -0800

28 lines

Re: memory needs

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:12:47 +0000

56 lines

Re: memory needs

Chuck Theobald <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:01:07 -0800

82 lines

Re: memory needs

David Flitney <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:16:03 +0000

54 lines

New Thread

mixed effects results in FSL -- conceptual problem

mixed effects results in FSL -- conceptual problem

David V. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:28:36 -0500

274 lines

Re: mixed effects results in FSL -- conceptual problem

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:50:47 +0000

109 lines

New Thread

Mixed-effect Models

Mixed-effect Models

MCLAREN, Donald <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:39:54 -0600

78 lines

Re: Mixed-effect Models

Nestor, Liam (Contractor) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:00:53 -0800

91 lines

Re: Mixed-effect Models

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 08:45:24 +0000

125 lines

New Thread

MNI subcortical structures atlas

MNI subcortical structures atlas

siamak <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 21:54:15 +0000

20 lines

Re: MNI subcortical structures atlas

David Flitney <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 22:48:30 +0000

35 lines

New Thread

mni->tlc, Lancaster transform

mni->tlc, Lancaster transform

John Ostuni <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:55:14 +0000

33 lines

Re: mni->tlc, Lancaster transform

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 23:13:50 +0000

73 lines

New Thread

multi subject analysis with fixed effect

multi subject analysis with fixed effect

Yael Shani <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:44:08 +0200

27 lines

Re: multi subject analysis with fixed effect

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:01:02 +0000

41 lines

New Thread

multiple t-tests

multiple t-tests

Vishwadeep Ahluwalia <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:55:18 +0000

21 lines

Re: multiple t-tests

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:07:06 +0000

52 lines

Re: multiple t-tests

Vishwadeep Ahluwalia <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:40:47 +0000

10 lines

Re: multiple t-tests

Vishwadeep Ahluwalia <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:26:26 +0000

129 lines

Re: multiple t-tests

Vishwadeep Ahluwalia <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:38:19 +0000

15 lines

Re: multiple t-tests

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:30:48 +0000

34 lines

Re: multiple t-tests

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:32:57 +0000

36 lines

New Thread

multiplying matrix for motion correction of Merged DW repetitions

Re: multiplying matrix for motion correction of Merged DW repetitions

Siewmin Gan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 01:40:01 +0000

65 lines

Re: multiplying matrix for motion correction of Merged DW repetitions

Siddharth Srivastava <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:08:03 -0800

162 lines

New Thread

Open Position for Post-doc at Stanford University

Open Position for Post-doc at Stanford University

Lucina Uddin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:20:44 +0000

28 lines

New Thread

Open Position for Research Assistant at Stanford University

Open Position for Research Assistant at Stanford University

Lucina Uddin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:19:49 +0000

31 lines

New Thread

orientation

orientation

Michael Rohan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 00:23:50 +0000

47 lines

Re: orientation

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:01:47 +0000

70 lines

New Thread

orthogonalization question

orthogonalization question

Ning Liu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:00:22 +0000

805 lines

Re: orthogonalization question

Ning Liu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:50:04 +0000

273 lines

Re: orthogonalization question

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:59:27 +0000

795 lines

Re: orthogonalization question

Ning Liu <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:58:09 +0000

15 lines

New Thread

Orthogonalize EVs wrt Motion possible?

Orthogonalize EVs wrt Motion possible?

David Paulsen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:41:37 +0000

32 lines

Re: Orthogonalize EVs wrt Motion possible?

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:15:59 +0000

64 lines

New Thread

Overlay must have same dimension--

Overlay must have same dimension--

Harish Kumar Maheshwari <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:24:28 +0000

21 lines

Re: Overlay must have same dimension--

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 17:28:19 +0000

38 lines

Re: Overlay must have same dimension--

Harish kumar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 08:13:24 +0800

154 lines

Re: Overlay must have same dimension--

XL <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:12:15 +0000

95 lines

Re: Overlay must have same dimension--

David Flitney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:43:35 +0000

106 lines

Re: Overlay must have same dimension--

Harish kumar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:22:55 -0500

285 lines

New Thread

overlay syntax

overlay syntax

Agatha Lenartowicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:05:42 -0800

88 lines

Re: overlay syntax

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 17:24:13 +0000

61 lines

New Thread

Percent signal change in standard space ROIs

Percent signal change in standard space ROIs

Greg Burgess <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:17:26 +0000

35 lines

Re: Percent signal change in standard space ROIs

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:46:02 +0000

59 lines

New Thread

percent signal change timecourse with featquery

percent signal change timecourse with featquery

Lara Foland <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:25:52 +0000

17 lines

Re: percent signal change timecourse with featquery

David V. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:35:53 -0500

41 lines

Re: percent signal change timecourse with featquery

Arne Ekstrom <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:38:47 -0800

38 lines

Re: percent signal change timecourse with featquery

Arne Ekstrom <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:50:06 -0800

36 lines

Re: percent signal change timecourse with featquery

Benny Liberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:28:34 +0100

28 lines

New Thread

Phase Unwrapping using fsl in linux

Phase Unwrapping using fsl in linux

Danilo Maziero <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 14:52:47 +0000

20 lines

Re: Phase Unwrapping using fsl in linux

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:17:52 +0100

84 lines

Re: Phase Unwrapping using fsl in linux

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 15:34:57 +0000

62 lines

Re: Phase Unwrapping using fsl in linux

Danilo Maziero <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 15:46:13 +0000

34 lines

Re: Phase Unwrapping using fsl in linux

David Flitney <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 15:56:44 +0000

48 lines

Re: Phase Unwrapping using fsl in linux

Danilo Maziero <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:07:07 +0000

26 lines

Re: Phase Unwrapping using fsl in linux

David Flitney <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:16:21 +0000

45 lines

Re: Phase Unwrapping using fsl in linux

Danilo Maziero <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:24:30 +0000

16 lines

Re: Phase Unwrapping using fsl in linux

Michael Hanke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 17:25:57 +0100

41 lines

Re: Phase Unwrapping using fsl in linux

David Flitney <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:33:53 +0000

34 lines

Re: Phase Unwrapping using fsl in linux

Danilo Maziero <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:43:33 +0000

14 lines

Re: Phase Unwrapping using fsl in linux

Michael Hanke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 17:43:45 +0100

31 lines

Re: Phase Unwrapping using fsl in linux

Danilo Maziero <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 17:03:57 +0000

14 lines

Re: Phase Unwrapping using fsl in linux

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 17:17:38 +0000

40 lines

Re: Phase Unwrapping using fsl in linux

Danilo Maziero <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 17:27:24 +0000

28 lines

Re: Phase Unwrapping using fsl in linux

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 23:29:57 +0000

58 lines

Re: Phase Unwrapping using fsl in linux

Danilo Maziero <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 16:16:07 +0000

21 lines

Re: Phase Unwrapping using fsl in linux

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:10:05 +0000

38 lines

Re: Phase Unwrapping using fsl in linux

Danilo Maziero <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:32:11 +0000

16 lines

New Thread

PhD Studentship

PhD Studentship

Narender Ramnani <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 06:06:51 +0000

68 lines

New Thread

Post hoc analysis of functional clusters

Post hoc analysis of functional clusters

Michael Browning <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:31:02 +0000

50 lines

Re: Post hoc analysis of functional clusters

Tom Johnstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:56:28 +0000

61 lines

Re: Post hoc analysis of functional clusters

Alexander J. Shackman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:14:49 -0600

188 lines

New Thread

Post-doctoral position, high-field fMRI

Post-doctoral position, high-field fMRI

Denis Schluppeck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:05:14 +0000

233 lines

New Thread

Postdoctoral Position Vacancy

Postdoctoral Position Vacancy

Ramnani N <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:54:07 -0000

322 lines

New Thread

Postdoctoral Research Associate Position

Postdoctoral Research Associate Position

Greg Burgess <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 04:36:45 +0000

57 lines

New Thread

PPI setup

PPI setup

Elizabeth Selgrade <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:18:14 -0500

25 lines

PPI Setup

Liz Selgrade <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 21:24:54 +0000

31 lines

Re: PPI Setup

MCLAREN, Donald <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:22:17 -0600

64 lines

New Thread

probabilistic tractography : why chose curvature threshold of 0.2?

Re: probabilistic tractography : why chose curvature threshold of 0.2?

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:30:25 +0000

588 lines

New Thread

problem with patch for randomise_parallel?

Re: problem with patch for randomise_parallel?

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 14:25:09 +0100

465 lines

Re: problem with patch for randomise_parallel?

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:46:17 +0000

87 lines

Re: problem with patch for randomise_parallel?

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 15:06:38 +0100

346 lines

Re: problem with patch for randomise_parallel?

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 15:04:34 +0000

216 lines

Re: problem with patch for randomise_parallel?

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 18:00:10 +0100

252 lines

New Thread

problem with TBSS/tbss_3_postreg

problem with TBSS/tbss_3_postreg

Hanne Antila <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:53:19 +0000

425 lines

Re: problem with TBSS/tbss_3_postreg

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:35:57 +0000

445 lines

Re: problem with TBSS/tbss_3_postreg

Hanne Antila <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 08:45:57 +0200

515 lines

Re: problem with TBSS/tbss_3_postreg

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 09:03:19 +0000

533 lines

Re: problem with TBSS/tbss_3_postreg

Hanne Antila <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:53:24 +0200

560 lines

Re: problem with TBSS/tbss_3_postreg

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:34:10 +0000

587 lines

New Thread

Problems from a learner

Problems from a learner

SUBSCRIBE FSL Yan Shuai <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 03:26:04 +0000

28 lines

Re: Problems from a learner

Xuelin Cui <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 06:59:49 +0300

107 lines

Re: Problems from a learner

SUBSCRIBE FSL Yan Shuai <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:32:07 +0000

31 lines

Re: Problems from a learner

Jonathan Peelle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:29:42 +0000

22 lines

New Thread

probtrack NaN

probtrack NaN

Daniel Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:28:54 +0000

19 lines

Re: probtrack NaN

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:12:20 +0000

43 lines

New Thread

Professional Research Assistant Position in laboratory of Dr. Marie T. Banich

Professional Research Assistant Position in laboratory of Dr. Marie T. Banich

Greg Burgess <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 03:38:23 +0000

64 lines

New Thread

Professional Research Assistant Position in laboratory of Dr. Marie T. Banich (correction)

Re: Professional Research Assistant Position in laboratory of Dr. Marie T. Banich (correction)

Greg Burgess <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 03:44:33 +0000

75 lines

New Thread

programming language/tool/script that is compatible with fsl well under linux

programming language/tool/script that is compatible with fsl well under linux

WangPing <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 03:40:10 +0800

68 lines

Re: programming language/tool/script that is compatible with fsl well under linux

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:47:10 -0600

275 lines

Re: programming language/tool/script that is compatible with fsl well under linux

Eugene Duff <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 19:49:46 +0000

107 lines

Re: programming language/tool/script that is compatible with fsl well under linux

Oliver Trebbe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 20:53:03 +0100

57 lines

Re: programming language/tool/script that is compatible with fsl well under linux

WangPing <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 03:57:47 +0800

119 lines

Re: programming language/tool/script that is compatible with fsl well under linux

Junqian Gordon Xu <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:24:27 -0600

94 lines

Re: programming language/tool/script that is compatible with fsl well under linux

WangPing <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 04:28:02 +0800

138 lines

Re: programming language/tool/script that is compatible with fsl well under linux

Michael Hanke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 07:07:51 +0100

56 lines

Re: programming language/tool/script that is compatible with fsl well under linux

Gael Varoquaux <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 07:16:40 +0100

42 lines

Re: programming language/tool/script that is compatible with fsl well under linux

WangPing <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:36:57 +0800

105 lines

New Thread

Q: fslview -b range applied to multiple images at once?

Q: fslview -b range applied to multiple images at once?

Rajeev Raizada <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:49:21 +0000

27 lines

Re: Q: fslview -b range applied to multiple images at once?

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:46:43 -0600

49 lines

Re: Q: fslview -b range applied to multiple images at once?

David Flitney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:02:45 +0000

44 lines

Re: Q: fslview -b range applied to multiple images at once?

Rajeev Raizada <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:21:57 +0000

39 lines

New Thread

Question about SIENA

Question about SIENA

Chunfang Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:29:40 +0000

47 lines

Re: Question about SIENA

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 10:17:32 +0000

80 lines

New Thread

Question about SIENA algorithm

Question about SIENA algorithm

Chunfang Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:13:42 +0000

45 lines

New Thread

Question about the edge points motion quantification in SIENA

Question about the edge points motion quantification in SIENA

Chunfang Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:05:12 +0000

45 lines

New Thread

Question for improving FIRST results

Question for improving FIRST results

Michael Scheel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:51:24 -0800

21 lines

Re: Question for improving FIRST results

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:09:36 +0000

41 lines

Re: Question for improving FIRST results

Michael Scheel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:27:32 -0800

53 lines

Re: Question for improving FIRST results

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 09:03:14 +0000

76 lines

New Thread

Queue not SGE but TORQUE

Queue not SGE but TORQUE

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:25:25 +0100

75 lines

Re: Queue not SGE but TORQUE

Colm Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:02:25 +0000

526 lines

Re: Queue not SGE but TORQUE

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:41:51 +0100

209 lines

New Thread

randomise

randomise

Live Eikenes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:21:17 +0100

16 lines

Re: randomise

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:36:45 +0000

38 lines

New Thread

randomise and covariates

randomise and covariates

Colm Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:50:39 +0000

90 lines

Re: randomise and covariates

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:26:48 +0000

134 lines

New Thread

Re : [FSL] Colour Bar Significance Values

Re : [FSL] Colour Bar Significance Values

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:57:17 -0800

67 lines

New Thread

Re : [FSL] colour bars

Re : [FSL] colour bars

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 05:46:14 -0800

57 lines

New Thread

Re : [FSL] FSL-VBM and similar diffusion analysis

Re : [FSL] FSL-VBM and similar diffusion analysis

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:35:19 -0800

68 lines

New Thread

Re : [FSL] take a different mask in tbss / randomise

Re : [FSL] take a different mask in tbss / randomise

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 08:37:54 -0800

72 lines

Re: Re : [FSL] take a different mask in tbss / randomise

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 17:52:44 +0100

216 lines

New Thread

Re : [FSL] tbss_2_reg problem

Re : [FSL] tbss_2_reg problem

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 08:33:35 -0800

44 lines

Re: Re : [FSL] tbss_2_reg problem

Dinesh K. Shukla <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 20:01:53 -0800

67 lines

Re: Re : [FSL] tbss_2_reg problem

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 04:17:06 -0800

94 lines

New Thread

registration

registration

Siddharth Srivastava <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:51:19 -0800

35 lines

Re: registration

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:28:22 +0000

33 lines

New Thread

Repeated Measures ANOVA

Repeated Measures ANOVA

Amy Krain <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:09:27 +0000

37 lines

Re: Repeated Measures ANOVA

Elham Zareh <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:55:57 -0000

58 lines

Re: Repeated Measures ANOVA

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:49:31 +0000

64 lines

New Thread

Research Assistant Positions in Structural and Functional Neuroimaging (Boston)

Research Assistant Positions in Structural and Functional Neuroimaging (Boston)

Stephanie Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 09:32:47 -0500

42 lines

New Thread

SENIOR POSTDOCTORAL POSITION (fMRI-DTI) ON ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AT TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN

SENIOR POSTDOCTORAL POSITION (fMRI-DTI) ON ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AT TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN

Arun Bokde, PhD <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 18:51:28 +0100

50 lines

New Thread

set output format

set output format

WangPing <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:25:58 +0800

109 lines

Re: set output format

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:39:41 +0000

37 lines

Re: set output format

WangPing <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:42:52 +0800

76 lines

New Thread

Siena basics

Siena basics

SUBSCRIBE FSL Kim <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 20:38:16 +0000

19 lines

New Thread

SIENA Error

Re: SIENA Error

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 10:37:12 +0000

247 lines

Re: SIENA Error

Evangelou, Iordanis (NIH/NINDS) [E] <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 20:00:33 -0500

278 lines

New Thread

siena output

siena output

Michael Scheel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:27:58 -0800

56 lines

Re: siena output

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:50:27 +0000

79 lines

Re: siena output

Michael Scheel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:42:02 -0800

125 lines

Re: siena output

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:32:56 +0000

152 lines

New Thread

Siena register two structural images

Siena register two structural images

SUBSCRIBE FSL Kim <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:20:26 +0000

60 lines

Siena register two structural images

SUBSCRIBE FSL Kim <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:46:08 +0000

67 lines

New Thread

Sienna register two structural images

Sienna register two structural images

SUBSCRIBE FSL Kim <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 22:44:22 +0000

24 lines

Re: Sienna register two structural images

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:30:30 +0000

48 lines

New Thread

significance questions

significance questions

Sarah Master <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:49:56 +0000

50 lines

Re: significance questions

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:28:09 +0000

96 lines

Re: significance questions

Sarah Master <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 22:14:30 -0800

117 lines

Re: significance questions

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:42:37 +0000

150 lines

New Thread

T1-weighted images and segmentation

T1-weighted images and segmentation

Liam Nestor <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:15:11 +0000

34 lines

Re: T1-weighted images and segmentation

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:40:40 +0000

57 lines

Re: T1-weighted images and segmentation

Nestor, Liam (Contractor) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:23:22 -0800

90 lines

Re: T1-weighted images and segmentation

Brian Patenaude <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:06:44 -0000

114 lines

Re: T1-weighted images and segmentation

Nestor, Liam (Contractor) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:07:18 -0800

143 lines

Re: T1-weighted images and segmentation

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:50:54 +0000

175 lines

New Thread

take a different mask in tbss / randomise

take a different mask in tbss / randomise

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 11:46:35 +0100

71 lines

New Thread

TBSS and FA statistic

TBSS and FA statistic

Yuzheng HU <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:20:07 +0000

61 lines

Re: TBSS and FA statistic

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:36:16 +0000

112 lines

Re: TBSS and FA statistic

Yuzheng HU <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 10:50:02 +0000

522 lines

Re: TBSS and FA statistic

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:25:49 +0000

105 lines

Re: TBSS and FA statistic

Yuzheng HU <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 01:51:57 +0000

16 lines

New Thread

TBSS for neonatal brain

TBSS for neonatal brain

cathyliu <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:51:24 +0800

90 lines

Re: TBSS for neonatal brain

Peter Kochunov <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:35:02 -0600

157 lines

Re: TBSS for neonatal brain

Counsell, Serena J <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:15:38 -0000

72 lines

Re: TBSS for neonatal brain

Counsell, Serena J <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:20:07 -0000

173 lines

Re: TBSS for neonatal brain

cathyliu <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 22:35:12 +0800

222 lines

Re: TBSS for neonatal brain

Counsell, Serena J <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:52:50 -0000

435 lines

Re: TBSS for neonatal brain

cathyliu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:07:00 +0800

377 lines

Re: TBSS for neonatal brain

Counsell, Serena J <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:20:52 -0000

429 lines

New Thread

tbss longitudinal

tbss longitudinal

Eytan Raz <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:00:34 +0000

17 lines

Re: tbss longitudinal

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:51:02 +0000

43 lines

Re: tbss longitudinal

Arnold Skimminge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 21:17:27 +0000

54 lines

New Thread

TBSS partial correlaion

Re: TBSS partial correlaion

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 10:32:57 +0000

108 lines

New Thread

TBSS partial volume effects?

Re: TBSS partial volume effects?

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 10:45:55 +0000

98 lines

New Thread

tbss_2_reg problem

tbss_2_reg problem

Dinesh K. Shukla <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 22:07:06 -0800

20 lines

New Thread

tbss_3_preproc problem with best target

tbss_3_preproc problem with best target

Roderick McColl <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:44:23 -0600

47 lines

Re: tbss_3_preproc problem with best target

Roderick McColl <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:09:49 -0600

67 lines

Re: tbss_3_preproc problem with best target

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:57:17 +0000

84 lines

Re: tbss_3_preproc problem with best target

Roderick McColl <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:09:17 -0600

99 lines

Re: tbss_3_preproc problem with best target

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:29:46 +0000

107 lines

New Thread

template for neonatal brain

template for neonatal brain

cathyliu <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:20:03 +0800

79 lines

Re: template for neonatal brain

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:43:44 +0000

50 lines

New Thread

temporal and spatial filtering - fslmaths -bptf -kernel

temporal and spatial filtering - fslmaths -bptf -kernel

孟春 <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:15:28 +0800

88 lines

Re: temporal and spatial filtering - fslmaths -bptf -kernel

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:52:56 +0000

89 lines

New Thread

thresholding question

thresholding question

Markus Ploner <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 16:39:54 +0000

26 lines

Re: thresholding question

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:34:06 +0000

58 lines

Re: thresholding question

Markus Ploner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:50:09 -0000

82 lines

Re: thresholding question

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:58:52 +0000

103 lines

New Thread

Transformation question

Transformation question

Joe Galea <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 20:42:31 +0000

46 lines

New Thread

ubuntu 8.04 dependencies problem

ubuntu 8.04 dependencies problem

Enzo Tagliazucchi <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 17:59:41 +0000

26 lines

Re: ubuntu 8.04 dependencies problem

Michael Hanke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 20:49:19 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

UCSD Postdoctoral Brain Imaging Fellowship Opportunity

UCSD Postdoctoral Brain Imaging Fellowship Opportunity

Clelia Ahrens-Barbeau <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:23:49 +0000

32 lines

New Thread

update on Incompatible Dimensions Exception error

update on Incompatible Dimensions Exception error

Cibu <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:08:24 -0500

224 lines

Re: update on Incompatible Dimensions Exception error

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:09:35 +0000

234 lines

Re: update on Incompatible Dimensions Exception error

Cibu Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:42:43 -0500

135 lines

New Thread

using f test from first level analysis in second level analysis in FEAT

using f test from first level analysis in second level analysis in FEAT

Yael Shani <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:14:08 +0200

35 lines

Re: using f test from first level analysis in second level analysis in FEAT

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 09:00:50 +0000

39 lines

Re: using f test from first level analysis in second level analysis in FEAT

Yael Shani <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 20:27:55 +0200

97 lines

Re: using f test from first level analysis in second level analysis in FEAT

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:21:16 +0000

83 lines

New Thread

Vertex and Covariate analysis with first_utils

Vertex and Covariate analysis with first_utils

Quincy Rondei <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:21:02 +0100

76 lines

Re: Vertex and Covariate analysis with first_utils

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:22:38 +0000

62 lines

Re: Vertex and Covariate analysis with first_utils

Quincy Rondei <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 16:30:20 +0100

37 lines

New Thread

Warning in TBSS with confound regressor

Warning in TBSS with confound regressor

Yuzheng HU <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:27:13 +0000

59 lines

Re: Warning in TBSS with confound regressor

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:36:53 +0000

108 lines

Re: Warning in TBSS with confound regressor

Yuzheng HU <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:38:43 +0000

79 lines

Re: Warning in TBSS with confound regressor

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:17:12 +0000

104 lines

Re: Warning in TBSS with confound regressor

Yuzheng HU <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 02:39:29 +0000

123 lines

New Thread

Waypoints and termination masks; more questions

Waypoints and termination masks; more questions

Carlos Faraco <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:51:39 +0000

32 lines

Re: Waypoints and termination masks; more questions

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:00:30 +0000

53 lines

Re: Waypoints and termination masks; more questions

Carlos Faraco <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:49:52 +0000

60 lines

Re: Waypoints and termination masks; more questions

Carlos Faraco <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:47:52 +0000

17 lines

Re: Waypoints and termination masks; more questions

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:48:26 +0000

41 lines

Re: Waypoints and termination masks; more questions

Carlos Faraco <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:10:24 +0000

69 lines

Re: Waypoints and termination masks; more questions

liang wang <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:30:23 -0800

216 lines

New Thread

within subject correlations

within subject correlations

David Shirinyan <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 02:07:07 +0000

19 lines

Re: within subject correlations

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 10:56:29 +0000

61 lines

Re: within subject correlations

David Shirinyan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 05:45:20 +0000

18 lines

Re: within subject correlations

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:54:50 +0000

103 lines

New Thread

wrong # args: should be "ecc_update_files w filename"?

wrong # args: should be "ecc_update_files w filename"?

Rajeet Saluja <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 21:56:28 +0000

42 lines

Re: wrong # args: should be "ecc_update_files w filename"?

Rajeet Saluja <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:12:31 +0000

12 lines

New Thread

zero filling dti images

zero filling dti images

Silviu Podariu <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 20:45:06 +0000

71 lines

Re: zero filling dti images

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 15:03:38 -0600

81 lines

Re: zero filling dti images

Arne Ekstrom <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:08:55 -0800

85 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager