JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


February 2009


View:

Show Author | Hide Author

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject

From

Date Sorted by Date, Most Recent First

Size

Re: Email is a wonderful medium

Lawrence Serewicz

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:37:41 +0000

211 lines

Re: Email is a wonderful medium

Roland Perry

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:41:16 +0000

40 lines

Re: Email is a wonderful medium

Chris Bayliss

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:09:51 +0000

157 lines

Re: Email is a wonderful medium

Lawrence Serewicz

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:04:44 +0000

179 lines

Re: Email is a wonderful medium

Andrew Charlesworth

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:44:31 +0000

129 lines

Re: Email is a wonderful medium

Lawrence Serewicz

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:27:43 +0000

295 lines

Re: Email is a wonderful medium

Tim Trent

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:04:04 +0000

181 lines

Re: Email is a wonderful medium

cathy brode

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:56:03 +0000

307 lines

Re: Email is a wonderful medium

Ben Plouviez

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:15:00 -0000

158 lines

Re: Email is a wonderful medium

Jethro R Binks

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:06:49 +0000

48 lines

Email is a wonderful medium

Tim Trent

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:51:22 +0000

154 lines

Re: census data question

chris pounder

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:51:28 -0000

71 lines

Re: census data question

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:14:52 +0000

139 lines

Re: census data question

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:07:11 -0000

774 lines

Re: census data question

Simon Howarth

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:06:56 -0000

907 lines

Re: census data question

Simon Howarth

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:00:57 -0000

101 lines

Re: census data question

Wiper, Carl

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:47:27 +0000

683 lines

Re: census data question

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:33:07 +0000

332 lines

Re: Is it personal data and should I release it?

Mark van Harmelen

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:40:08 +0000

169 lines

Re: census data question

Broadfoot, Kevin

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:20:04 -0000

179 lines

Re: census data question

Carter, Antoinette (Global IS)

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:12:00 -0000

117 lines

Re: census data question

Broadfoot, Kevin

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:59:25 -0000

158 lines

Re: Is it personal data and should I release it?

Donald Henderson

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:39:14 -0000

522 lines

census data question

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:32:29 +0000

41 lines

Is it personal data and should I release it?

Cotterill, Steve

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:25:20 -0000

315 lines

Re: Health questionnaires ?

Carter, Antoinette (Global IS)

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:35:21 -0000

117 lines

Re: Health questionnaires ?

Phil Bradshaw

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:28:02 +0000

32 lines

Re: Health questionnaires ?

Jon Dunster

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:07:25 +0000

41 lines

Re: When an SAR is not an SAR

Tim Trent

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:04:18 +0000

167 lines

Re: When an SAR is not an SAR

Tim Trent

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:51:33 +0000

617 lines

Re: When an SAR is not an SAR

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:49:48 -0000

281 lines

Re: When an SAR is not an SAR

Simon Richardson

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:03:08 +0000

223 lines

Re: When an SAR is not an SAR

Tim Trent

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:47:16 +0000

414 lines

Re: Section 11 rights at work

Bradshaw, Phillip

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:11:04 -0000

455 lines

Re: Section 11 rights at work

Peter Mead

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:54:16 -0000

551 lines

Re: Section 11 rights at work

Matthew Cooper

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:35:41 -0000

191 lines

Re: Section 11 rights at work

Bradshaw, Phillip

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:10:33 -0000

95 lines

Re: Section 11 rights at work

Roland Perry

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:25:56 +0000

40 lines

Re: Section 11 rights at work

Matthew Cooper

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:14:02 -0000

781 lines

Re: Section 11 rights at work

Paul Ticher

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:09:57 -0000

101 lines

Re: Section 11 rights at work

Bradshaw, Phillip

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:07:11 -0000

292 lines

Section 11 rights at work

Carter, Antoinette (Global IS)

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:39:51 -0000

155 lines

Re: Proofs supplied for a SAR by a Third Party

Giles, Kevin

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:33:49 -0000

157 lines

Re: Proofs supplied for a SAR by a Third Party

Carter, Antoinette (Global IS)

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:43:00 -0000

748 lines

Re: Proofs supplied for a SAR by a Third Party

Tim Trent

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:34:17 +0000

376 lines

Re: Proofs supplied for a SAR by a Third Party

Watts, Clare (C.)

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:24:31 -0000

405 lines

Re: Proofs supplied for a SAR by a Third Party

Tim Trent

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:00:02 +0000

162 lines

Proofs supplied for a SAR by a Third Party

Clare Watts

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:57:16 +0000

70 lines

Re: Information Commissioner changes tack on da ta sharing bill

Scourfield, Brenda

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:35:51 -0000

250 lines

Re: Information Commissioner changes tack on da ta sharing bill

Giles, Kevin

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:16:56 -0000

920 lines

Re: Information Commissioner changes tack on da ta sharing bill

Bailey, Trish

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:16:46 -0000

120 lines

Re: Information Commissioner changes tack on da ta sharing bill

Scourfield, Brenda

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:13:18 -0000

99 lines

Seminar on Sensitive Data: Perceptions and Implications - 6 March 2009 (afternoon only)

Peter Shepherd

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:16:57 -0000

410 lines

Re: Health questionnaires ?

Tim Trent

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:21:06 +0000

268 lines

Health questionnaires ?

Jon Dunster

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:27:46 +0000

43 lines

Re: Facebook U Turn

Marchini, Renzo

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:14:16 -0500

112 lines

Re: Facebook U Turn

Tim Trent

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:26:41 +0000

250 lines

Facebook U Turn

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:06:27 +0000

46 lines

Vacancy - Information Management Officer

Leoni, Rudi

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:39:49 +0000

69 lines

Re: Section 29 Exemptions

Chris Brogan

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:27:57 -0000

172 lines

Information Commissioner changes tack on data sharing bill

chris pounder

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:29:27 -0000

46 lines

Re: New FSA rules on fax machines.....

Pat Walshe

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:55:30 +0000

44 lines

Re: New FSA rules on fax machines.....

Pat Walshe

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:09:46 +0000

35 lines

New FSA rules on fax machines.....

Clare Watts

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:54:47 +0000

49 lines

Re: Paper submission deadline extended: MULTICONF-09

Tim Trent

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 16:31:54 +0000

136 lines

Re: Government standards for encrypted websites

Dr. Su Beesley

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 13:40:25 +0000

87 lines

Re: Government standards for encrypted websites

Tim Trent

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:33:05 +0000

247 lines

Re: Government standards for encrypted websites

Andrew Cormack

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:16:18 -0000

61 lines

Re: Government standards for encrypted websites

Tim Trent

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:11:46 +0000

579 lines

Re: Government standards for encrypted websites

Scourfield, Brenda

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:31:20 -0000

305 lines

Re: Government standards for encrypted websites

Simon Howarth

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:04:33 -0000

479 lines

Re: Government standards for encrypted websites

Tim Trent

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:38:16 +0000

524 lines

Re: Government standards for encrypted websites

Tim Trent

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:27:11 +0000

354 lines

Re: Mandatory Minimum Measures'

chris pounder

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:43:15 -0000

734 lines

Re: Mandatory Minimum Measures'

Simon Howarth

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:06:19 -0000

485 lines

Government standards for encrypted websites

Henley, Lee

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:51:24 -0000

188 lines

Re: When an SAR is not an SAR

Bradshaw, Phillip

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:07:24 -0000

259 lines

Re: When an SAR is not an SAR

Tim Trent

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:44:51 +0000

201 lines

Re: When an SAR is not an SAR

Tim Trent

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:41:26 +0000

271 lines

Mandatory Minimum Measures’

cathy brode

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:33:57 +0000

117 lines

Re: When an SAR is not an SAR

Simon Richardson

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:28:07 +0000

38 lines

Re: When an SAR is not an SAR

chris pounder

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:41:55 -0000

81 lines

Re: When an SAR is not an SAR

Simon Richardson

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:35:35 +0000

79 lines

Re: When an SAR is not an SAR

Pat Walshe

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:32:11 +0000

46 lines

Re: Information Commissioner's staff talk sense

Roland Perry

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:22:20 +0000

43 lines

Re: Information Commissioner's staff talk sense

Roland Perry

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:18:37 +0000

70 lines

Re: When an SAR is not an SAR

Jethro R Binks

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:10:57 +0000

41 lines

A Different kind of remote working

Clare Watts

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:26:52 +0000

81 lines

Re: When an SAR is not an SAR

Phil Bradshaw

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:01:16 +0000

69 lines

A different kind of remote working

Clare Watts

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:19:38 +0000

77 lines

A different kind of remote working

Clare Watts

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:18:20 +0000

77 lines

Re: When an SAR is not an SAR

Simon Richardson

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:53:02 +0000

63 lines

Re: Section 29 Exemptions

Simon Richardson

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:26:40 +0000

144 lines

[POSSIBLE SPAM] Government plans travel database

Robert (Bob) Waixel

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:10:19 +0000

115 lines

Re: Surveillance State

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 12:50:01 +0100

92 lines

Surveillance Society report

chris pounder

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 11:24:54 -0000

34 lines

Re: Surveillance State

Robert Streeter

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 17:39:19 +0000

32 lines

Surveillance State

Ibrahim Hasan

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 11:42:27 +0000

47 lines

Re: Reason for leaving - dismissal

Roland Perry

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 14:12:21 +0000

40 lines

Re: Reason for leaving - dismissal

Healy, Susan

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:41:48 -0000

53 lines

Re: Reason for leaving - dismissal

Roland Perry

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:11:05 +0000

37 lines

Re: Reason for leaving - dismissal

Tim Trent

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:24:05 +0000

206 lines

Re: Reason for leaving - dismissal

Roland Perry

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:11:17 +0000

51 lines

Re: Reason for leaving - dismissal

Bradshaw, Phillip

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 11:02:22 -0000

185 lines

Re: Reason for leaving - dismissal

Tim Trent

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:55:13 +0000

781 lines

Re: Reason for leaving - dismissal

Bradshaw, Phillip

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:39:48 -0000

469 lines

Re: Reason for leaving - dismissal

J.S.M.Whitaker

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:46:18 -0000

61 lines

Re: Reason for leaving - dismissal

Marchini, Renzo

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 02:23:42 -0500

440 lines

Re: Reason for leaving - dismissal

Tim Trent

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 18:25:43 +0000

213 lines

Reason for leaving - dismissal

Graeme Hawley

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 17:42:44 +0000

58 lines

Re: Information Commissioner's staff talk sense

Paul Ticher

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 17:39:24 -0000

63 lines

Re: Information Commissioner's staff talk sense

Bailey, Trish

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:22:35 -0000

171 lines

commercial use of the list

Tim Trent

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:54:47 +0000

156 lines

Re: Information Commissioner's staff talk sense

J.S.M.Whitaker

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:42:14 -0000

193 lines

40% off for Records Management conference

Hetty

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:34:06 +0000

121 lines

Re: Email SARs and the Junk Filter

Scourfield, Brenda

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:48:12 -0000

355 lines

FW: [data-protection] Information Commissioner's staff talk sense

Jane Bartlett

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:28:21 -0000

201 lines

Re: Email SARs and the Junk Filter

Bradshaw, Phillip

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:27:12 -0000

571 lines

Re: Email SARs and the Junk Filter

Tim Turner

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:18:26 -0000

377 lines

Re: UCU Requests for External Examiner Names and Institutions

David Hirst

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:15:47 +0000

98 lines

Email SARs and the Junk Filter

Tim Trent

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:08:10 +0000

125 lines

Re: Information Commissioner's staff talk sense

Paul Ticher

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:37:08 -0000

139 lines

Re: Information Commissioner's staff talk sense

Bradshaw, Phillip

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:29:01 -0000

92 lines

Re: Information Commissioner's staff talk sense

Tim Trent

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:19:17 +0000

237 lines

Re: When an SAR is not an SAR

Tim Trent

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:10:37 +0000

914 lines

Information Commissioner's staff talk sense

Paul Ticher

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:52:48 -0000

39 lines

Junk mail?

chris pounder

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:46:10 -0000

877 lines

Re: When an SAR is not an SAR

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:32:53 -0000

883 lines

When an SAR is not an SAR

Tim Trent

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:11:40 +0000

393 lines

CSA request - thanks

Sarah Wickham

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:57:29 +0000

141 lines

Re: Data protection issues when creating a new organisation

Donald Henderson

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:48:56 -0000

397 lines

Retention of spoilt Birth/Death/Marriage Certificates

Gill Wood

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:40:59 +0000

43 lines

Re: Data protection issues when creating a new organisation

Tim Turner

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:03:46 -0000

411 lines

Data protection issues when creating a new organisation

Lawrence Serewicz

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:51:32 +0000

157 lines

Re: Does anyone still remember the Crematorium?

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:23:25 -0000

668 lines

Re: Does anyone still remember the Crematorium?

Tim Trent

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:13:04 +0000

231 lines

Re: Does anyone still remember the Crematorium?

Tim Trent

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:09:36 +0000

237 lines

Re: Does anyone still remember the Crematorium?

Lawrence Serewicz

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:48:40 +0000

512 lines

Re: Does anyone still remember the Crematorium?

Tim Turner

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:45:37 -0000

634 lines

Re: Does anyone still remember the Crematorium?

Griffiths, Ian

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:41:56 -0000

697 lines

Privacy professional facing criminal charges

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:09:58 +0100

56 lines

Re: Does anyone still remember the Crematorium?

Tim Trent

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:40:39 +0000

259 lines

Resources

Henley, Lee

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:01:19 -0000

202 lines

Re: Does anyone still remember the Crematorium?

Griffiths, Ian

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:45:15 -0000

165 lines

Does anyone still remember the Crematorium?

Tim Trent

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:44:27 +0000

265 lines

DIGITAL LIVES RESEARCH CONFERENCE 2009

Lynn Young

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:38:55 +0000

118 lines

Section 29 Exemptions

Chris Brogan

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 13:54:22 -0000

477 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager