JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for COOT Archives


COOT Archives

COOT Archives


February 2009


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"Copy NCS residue range" does not seem to work (2 messages)
A problem about peptide link of special residues (5 messages)
Anyone got Coot to build on openSUSE? (1 message)
clicking with CA display (2 messages)
Coot background color (2 messages)
Coot Crash (1 message)
Coot crash (0.6-pre-1-revision-1834-10) (5 messages)
Coot crash issue (2 messages)
Coot crashing on Pentium 4 machines (1 message)
Coot GUI [was Re: [ccp4bb] Replacement for arp_waters?] (1 message)
coot0.6-pre-1 on FC10 (4 messages)
Dashed Lines (2 messages)
Enhancement Request: Ability to add residues into an empty slot in a chain (1 message)
Export residue density fit values to file (3 messages)
how to optimise the geometry in the coot (2 messages)
how to tell coot to use a specific http_proxy (2 messages)
Key-binding for changing active map/molecule color (4 messages)
map-mask-by-molecule (4 messages)
O other NCS chain (3 messages)
on the topic of secondary struct. assignments... (4 messages)
Open windows with startup script (2 messages)
OS X coot-0.6-pre-1-revision-1876 - minor bug (1 message)
OS X: coot-0.6-pre-1-revision-1847-1 (14 messages)
problem with os x coot (1 message)
pymol does not cartoon-ize my "helices" : coot helical restraints (6 messages)
python or scheme (4 messages)
python or scheme? (5 messages)
showing a ligand as ball and stick in electrostatic surface view of the protein (2 messages)
Stereo projection with Coot (4 messages)
sym operators and deriving multimers (2 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

COOT Home

COOT Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"Copy NCS residue range" does not seem to work

"Copy NCS residue range" does not seem to work

Ethan Merritt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:58:27 -0800

44 lines

Re: "Copy NCS residue range" does not seem to work

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:10:14 +0000

62 lines

New Thread

A problem about peptide link of special residues

A problem about peptide link of special residues

Feng Yu <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:30:40 +0000

26 lines

Re: A problem about peptide link of special residues

Garib Murshudov <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:58:42 +0000

49 lines

Re: A problem about peptide link of special residues

郁峰 <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:30:30 +0800

69 lines

Re: A problem about peptide link of special residues

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:22:23 +0000

35 lines

Re: A problem about peptide link of special residues

Garib Murshudov <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:06:49 +0000

45 lines

New Thread

Anyone got Coot to build on openSUSE?

Anyone got Coot to build on openSUSE?

Kevin Cowtan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:11:54 +0000

18 lines

New Thread

clicking with CA display

clicking with CA display

Phil Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:31:22 +0000

15 lines

Re: clicking with CA display

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:43:32 +0000

20 lines

New Thread

Coot background color

Coot background color

Walter Novak <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 21:10:56 -0500

2529 lines

Re: Coot background color

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 02:53:19 +0000

27 lines

New Thread

Coot Crash

Coot Crash

Abhinav Kumar <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:51:39 -0800

35 lines

New Thread

Coot crash (0.6-pre-1-revision-1834-10)

Coot crash (0.6-pre-1-revision-1834-10)

S. Shanmuga Sundara Raj <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:11:32 -0800

40 lines

Re: Coot crash (0.6-pre-1-revision-1834-10)

Jonathan Winger <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:53:16 -0800

70 lines

Re: Coot crash (0.6-pre-1-revision-1834-10)

William Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:58:57 -0800

102 lines

Re: Coot crash (0.6-pre-1-revision-1834-10)

S. Shanmuga Sundara Raj <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 14:40:30 -0800

72 lines

Re: Coot crash (0.6-pre-1-revision-1834-10)

William Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 15:19:23 -0800

167 lines

New Thread

Coot crash issue

Coot crash issue

Roger Rowlett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:17:58 -0500

67 lines

Re: Coot crash issue

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 23:05:12 +0000

58 lines

New Thread

Coot crashing on Pentium 4 machines

Coot crashing on Pentium 4 machines

Roger Rowlett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:16:12 -0500

45 lines

New Thread

Coot GUI [was Re: [ccp4bb] Replacement for arp_waters?]

Re: Coot GUI [was Re: [ccp4bb] Replacement for arp_waters?]

Donnie Berkholz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 20:31:13 -0800

69 lines

New Thread

coot0.6-pre-1 on FC10

coot0.6-pre-1 on FC10

David Schwefel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:37:05 +0000

45 lines

Re: coot0.6-pre-1 on FC10

William G. Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:59:14 -0800

53 lines

Re: coot0.6-pre-1 on FC10

Kay Diederichs <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:59:27 +0100

182 lines

Re: coot0.6-pre-1 on FC10

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:45:43 +0000

31 lines

New Thread

Dashed Lines

Re: Dashed Lines

Petra Lukacik <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:30:04 -0500

51 lines

Re: Dashed Lines

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:45:03 +0000

35 lines

New Thread

Enhancement Request: Ability to add residues into an empty slot in a chain

Re: Enhancement Request: Ability to add residues into an empty slot in a chain

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 00:34:10 +0000

33 lines

New Thread

Export residue density fit values to file

Export residue density fit values to file

Sander Nabuurs <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:35:25 +0000

23 lines

Re: Export residue density fit values to file

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:53:18 +0000

29 lines

Re: Export residue density fit values to file

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:42:59 +0000

69 lines

New Thread

how to optimise the geometry in the coot

how to optimise the geometry in the coot

Jhon Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:21:44 +0530

61 lines

Re: how to optimise the geometry in the coot

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:06:51 +0000

61 lines

New Thread

how to tell coot to use a specific http_proxy

how to tell coot to use a specific http_proxy

Christian Benda <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:04:11 +0000

23 lines

Re: how to tell coot to use a specific http_proxy

Bernhard Lohkamp <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:58:58 +0100

59 lines

New Thread

Key-binding for changing active map/molecule color

Key-binding for changing active map/molecule color

Victor Alves <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:44:53 +0000

85 lines

Re: Key-binding for changing active map/molecule color

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:08:44 +0000

64 lines

Re: Key-binding for changing active map/molecule color

Judit Debreczeni <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:04:11 +0000

53 lines

Re: Key-binding for changing active map/molecule color

Victor Alves <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:38:36 +0000

168 lines

New Thread

map-mask-by-molecule

map-mask-by-molecule

Karen Fleming <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:05:14 +0000

58 lines

Re: map-mask-by-molecule

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:24:03 +0000

64 lines

Re: map-mask-by-molecule

Bernhard Lohkamp <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:29:25 +0100

89 lines

Re: map-mask-by-molecule

Karen Fleming <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:01:47 -0500

228 lines

New Thread

O other NCS chain

O other NCS chain

Jianghai Zhu <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:02:14 -0500

25 lines

Re: O other NCS chain

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:33:04 +0000

31 lines

Re: O other NCS chain

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:59:52 +0000

39 lines

New Thread

on the topic of secondary struct. assignments...

on the topic of secondary struct. assignments...

Don Kerkow <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:32:26 -0800

24 lines

Re: on the topic of secondary struct. assignments...

Nathaniel Echols <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 17:26:20 -0800

35 lines

Re: on the topic of secondary struct. assignments...

Santosh Panjikar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 01:50:12 +0100

35 lines

Re: on the topic of secondary struct. assignments...

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:35:57 +0000

49 lines

New Thread

Open windows with startup script

Open windows with startup script

Meindert Lamers <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:57:47 -0800

29 lines

Re: Open windows with startup script

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:47:06 +0000

36 lines

New Thread

OS X coot-0.6-pre-1-revision-1876 - minor bug

OS X coot-0.6-pre-1-revision-1876 - minor bug

Scott Classen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:47:21 -0800

17 lines

New Thread

OS X: coot-0.6-pre-1-revision-1847-1

OS X: coot-0.6-pre-1-revision-1847-1

William Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:16:10 -0800

20 lines

Re: OS X: coot-0.6-pre-1-revision-1847-1

Engin Ozkan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 19:50:54 -0800

38 lines

Re: OS X: coot-0.6-pre-1-revision-1847-1

William G. Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 20:25:02 -0800

77 lines

Re: OS X: coot-0.6-pre-1-revision-1847-1

Engin Ozkan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 20:30:05 -0800

85 lines

Re: OS X: coot-0.6-pre-1-revision-1847-1

William G. Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 20:32:40 -0800

110 lines

Re: OS X: coot-0.6-pre-1-revision-1847-1

Engin Ozkan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 20:42:00 -0800

118 lines

Re: OS X: coot-0.6-pre-1-revision-1847-1

William G. Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 20:50:00 -0800

27 lines

Re: OS X: coot-0.6-pre-1-revision-1847-1

Engin Ozkan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 23:56:40 -0800

48 lines

Re: OS X: coot-0.6-pre-1-revision-1847-1

Felix Frolow <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:16:45 +0200

71 lines

Re: OS X: coot-0.6-pre-1-revision-1847-1

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 08:49:02 +0000

20 lines

Re: OS X: coot-0.6-pre-1-revision-1847-1

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:13:14 +0000

26 lines

Re: OS X: coot-0.6-pre-1-revision-1847-1

Engin Ozkan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 07:16:32 -0800

33 lines

Re: OS X: coot-0.6-pre-1-revision-1847-1

William G. Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 07:32:26 -0800

41 lines

Re: OS X: coot-0.6-pre-1-revision-1847-1

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 15:27:17 +0000

22 lines

New Thread

problem with os x coot

problem with os x coot

Jianghai Zhu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:41:30 -0500

18 lines

New Thread

pymol does not cartoon-ize my "helices" : coot helical restraints

pymol does not cartoon-ize my "helices" : coot helical restraints

hari jayaram <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 12:50:43 -0500

62 lines

Re: pymol does not cartoon-ize my "helices" : coot helical restraints

Chavas Leo <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 10:04:57 +0000

178 lines

Re: pymol does not cartoon-ize my "helices" : coot helical restraints

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 13:24:31 +0000

44 lines

Re: pymol does not cartoon-ize my "helices" : coot helical restraints

hari jayaram <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 10:38:47 -0500

121 lines

Re: pymol does not cartoon-ize my "helices" : coot helical restraints

Donnie Berkholz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 10:49:55 -0800

73 lines

Re: pymol does not cartoon-ize my "helices" : coot helical restraints

Lynn F. Ten Eyck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 14:10:34 -0800

57 lines

New Thread

python or scheme

python or scheme

Markus Dehnhardt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 20:06:13 +0000

60 lines

Re: python or scheme

Pete Meyer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:48:23 -0600

43 lines

Re: python or scheme

William G. Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:36:54 -0800

35 lines

Re: python or scheme

Ethan A Merritt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:17:23 -0800

84 lines

New Thread

python or scheme?

Re: python or scheme?

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:03:14 +0000

83 lines

Re: python or scheme?

Frank von Delft <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:35:42 +0000

101 lines

Re: python or scheme?

Alastair Fyfe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:07:03 -0800

94 lines

Re: python or scheme?

Judit Debreczeni <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:01:44 +0000

47 lines

Re: python or scheme?

Kevin Cowtan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:24:39 +0000

108 lines

New Thread

showing a ligand as ball and stick in electrostatic surface view of the protein

showing a ligand as ball and stick in electrostatic surface view of the protein

ANDY DODDS <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:03:11 +0000

16 lines

Re: showing a ligand as ball and stick in electrostatic surface view of the protein

Bernhard Lohkamp <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:17:23 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

Stereo projection with Coot

Stereo projection with Coot

Evan Kantrowitz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:37:05 +0000

13 lines

Re: Stereo projection with Coot

Schubert, Carsten [PRDUS] <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:53:03 -0500

36 lines

Re: Stereo projection with Coot

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:04:31 +0000

24 lines

Re: Stereo projection with Coot

Schubert, Carsten [PRDUS] <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:13:21 -0500

49 lines

New Thread

sym operators and deriving multimers

sym operators and deriving multimers

John Bruning <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 15:14:10 -0600

36 lines

Re: sym operators and deriving multimers

Roberto Steiner <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 09:32:00 +0000

35 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager